Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
They're pretty reliable I guess, they just can't be translated to real life performance
http://briefmobile.com/cyanogen-demonstrates-quadrants-flaws
Not so, with GB and lag fix kernel and modified prop I had over 2300, but rest of the UX was bad even games were jumpy, now i have less than 1000 with Quadrant and butter smooth UX (user experrience) and better and more stable framerate in games than ever
Let's say on PC you have great score with PC Mark and 3D Mark but you can't play 3D Tetris...
Quadrant Advanced is better in terms that it gives you separate score chart for different parts of test.
Its a benchmark that does not reflect the usability or response of the SGS .
Highest score on Eclair then with each upgrade score gets lower and phone gets faster more responsive and less laggy .
jje
Quadrant results are useful if the ONLY thing you want to run on your phone is quadrant, because that's what it tests. It's similar to how on PC's, some games prefer different video cards. It also comes down to space/speed of algorithms..
The best thing to do, is to uninstall Quadrant, and test the ROM's yourself
Related
Hi everyone,
I have question. My result in Quadrant Standard is something about 800. A lot of people have higher result that's mine. There is any method to do SGS faster and get better results or where is problem in my phone ??
if you want higher quadrant scores you need to do a lagfix. the market has one called one click lag fix but it roots your phone. imo quadrant scores arent indicative of real world phone speed. if it feels fast, it is fast. go to the development section and read up on why this pone lags and all the different lag fixes available. but basically samsung uses a slow file system which causes 'lag' but i guess its all relative to what you are used to.
Everything is ok now. Thanks for your help
So a few news sites are showing off the Quadrant score of the Nexus S running CM7: http://www.talkandroid.com/27099-nexus-s-scores-high-on-quadrant-benchmarks-running-cyanogenmod-7/
One thing I noticed is that the CPU Score is 5372. When I run Quadrant Advanced on my i9000 the CPU Score is only 1371. What has changed in CM7 that gives the Hummingbird processor so much more computational power and how do we get it on the SGS?
Think those guys just know what they are doing when it comes to Android unlike Samsung :/ lol
I'd be interested to see how the stock Nexus S firmware does in the same benchmark. I don't care about the overall Quadrant score, just the cpu part. I wish we could have CM on SGS
Hi guys!
can you post your SGS configuration and tell us how do you score with Quadrant Benchmark?
mine is that:
SGS i9000m
kernel speedmod 13c - rom ZeroGingerMIUI with no OC Lagfix ---> 1800
kernel speedmod 13c - rom ZeroGingerMIUI with 1.2ghz OC Lagfix---> 2100
kernel super optimized - rom ZeroGingerMIUI with 1.2ghz OC Lagfix--->2350
kernel hacked Supercurio for GingerBread - rom Ultibread v1.4 Lagfix(no system) --->2000
yes, i'm a bench_maniac!
Stock I9000 XXJVK --> ~awesome scoreon my user experience benchmark.
Awesome... no words to describe!
Quadrant doesn't reflect real life performance at all. I used to get 2200+ with a lagfix on 2.1 but it was no where close to the real life performance of what I experience now on 2.3.3 JVK with no lagfix where Quadrant score is just 1020 .
Nice
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
quadrant doesn't reflect the actual user performance/experience because in the past i've had high quadrant scores but poor user experience.
but as the versions change (i.e eclair>froyo>gingerbread) i get lower scores but better user performance.
Agree my user experience benchmark is also off the scale .
Quadrant crap as always .
Why dont you post all these benchmark quadrant posts in the same place if you want to compare size.
jje
1200 on miui
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Mine is scoring "awesome" too in user experience!
I personally think this thread should be removed I'm afraid.. For starters, there are a billion other quadrant threads, and nobody has F***king bothered, as mentioned to collate the values into a table. Also, nothing is worse than breeding a culture of people who believe that Quadrant accurately measures the mobile performance for all workloads.
Auzy said:
I personally think this thread should be removed I'm afraid.. For starters, there are a billion other quadrant threads, and nobody has F***king bothered, as mentioned to collate the values into a table. Also, nothing is worse than breeding a culture of people who believe that Quadrant accurately measures the mobile performance for all workloads.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with Ausy that this kind of thread is not of much practical use. I run Quadrant weekly, but only to compare my phone to itself as a diagnostic. If the Q score changes radically, I try to find out why. I also use it to compare ROMs.
However, I don't see that the benchmark scores of two different phones will tell you anything of much value when you compare them.
Hi, i went down quite a lot of pages and did not find any antutu score tests on galaxy s.
I was just wondering whats the best ones in what rom's and what kernels. I tried to google i9000 antutu best scores but seems there was not really that many hits and best scores i found was like 4k what sound quite a lot but not sure how legit those are when there was no pics.
I mean my friend got a galaxy note and it get a bit over 7k point and then reading more the damn old sucker galaxy s2 best with pic proof is like 8k.
Was just wondering how my fine old faithful galaxy s can do. I got a decent gingerbread rom and i get a bit over 3k without OC. Can't remember how much more i got with ICS OC'd to 1,4ghz. it was over 3k too tough but not remembering how much above.
Would be nice if you can post your roms that score over 3k and what roms + kernels you are using and how much OC you done. I mean the i9000 is not the fastest phone by far at this point but would be intressed to see if people got how high antutu scores.
Nowadays benchmark doesnt mean anything. There's many ways to cheat, and even if those score were honest it doesn't matter much. What does matter is real life performance
Oh antutu score can be fixed too these days? I mean i now the quadrant score has been always a bit question mark and i heard lots of cheating in it. Well i was just wondering the honest score. I'm trying to find a decent fast rom and the better score in benchmarks the less processor power it uses on stuff and that means a bit better battery life too.. well not always.
I'm just trying to get all out of my sgs before sgs3 comes out.. i must say i just love t his phone.. when i had a fast rom where it worked stable at 1.4ghz it was as fast as iphone 4s in same internet pages on stock browser.
But if people could post the LEGIT non cheated scores it would be better than the cheating ones lol
an0nym0us_ said:
Nowadays benchmark doesnt mean anything. There's many ways to cheat, and even if those score were honest it doesn't matter much. What does matter is real life performance
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1. SGS with Froyo and EXT2 lagfix got a much higher score in Quadrant, but with ICS the experience is much better.
So the real question is what ROMs have given the best real life performance for you?
For me, it's 3827( on Antutu ) ;D with TiramiSlim RC2.0
I am pretty new to OC so I cant figure out how to do it for 1.5 or 1.6 GHz.
Even when undervolting A1 kernel it is so unstable and cant pass antutu benchmark without crash and reset.
My best values are attached. Its A1 kernel, performance and cfq at 1.4ghz
I hope you will give me advice how to do better cpu benchmark values.
http://oi47.tinypic.com/2ia4ug7.jpg
You need a kernel that supports it. Look for one that is specific to your device.
God promised men that he'd put beautiful women in all corners of the world. Then he laughed and laughed and made the world round
My experience with undervolting is that the gain, battery wise, is nominal, hence I don't care UV.
I remember I got ~7300 in Antutu running CM10 @1500 with interactive governor. But benchmark
isn't everything, and I'm most happy with stock ICS with A1's 1.8.3c @1400 (interactive). I would
prefer running it @1500, but it tends to get a wee bit warm when doing this.
Of course I use kernel designed for my device.
In game overclocking for high performance are numbers important. Every 20pts in antutu benchmark (3d section) does matter in ingame fps (in my case shadowgun deadzone) and you can See it. So nobody has better score? :'(
I believe this is around the highest I got. No, you can't get too much higher. I am quite frustrated at this devices development - the xoom gets much better development and optimisation.... It is all about optimisation.