Sorry if this had been discussed somewhere else but what kernels, roms, or settings using set cpu or voltage control or whatever should i use to get the 2000+ quadrant score ive been dreaming of... The best i got was 1895.. Im on RYAN OCLF and i overlocked it to 1.2 ghz... Im on stock 2.2 and on the voodoo kernel.. Please post your scores and combinations so i can try them all :-D
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
My best: 2520
Deodexed JVK 2.3.3, CF-Root-XX_OXA_JVK-v3.1-CWM3RFS
Tweaks: RAM,SD,I/O,Kernel,VM,Media,Touchscreen
/system ext4/dbdata ext4/data ext4/cache ext4
no OC/UV
And if you are dreaming of quadrant score, then you are in trouble
Dont want to sound like a noob but i really dont get what u wrote here can u bare with me and explain?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Basically to get a better score as you have now is to install gingerbread(stock is fine, doesnt have to be deodexed) rom + CF root kernel. Enable its tweaks in the Tweak app. Convert to ext4. Thats it. Before you do , you know the drill. Backup, unlagfix, and you have been warned, when you mess up its on you
The corresponding links to these parts are in my signature first row I think
Please. Quad scores are pointless.
For example : a drag car can hit 250 MPH in 6 seconds, but its not very useful for taking the kids to school.
The only value of quad etc scores is to measure the effect of changes/ mods to your own device. If quad scores were important we would all own LG optimus 2s, wouldn't we?
The real test is how long you can run dungeon defenders before your phone melts!
Oh btw my best quad score was 2300 ish running MIUI RC4 overclocked and undervolted. I could have increased the score by forcing the CPU to run at 1.3 ghz all the time, changing the governor settings, closing all apps and services and blasting nitrous oxide through the air intake but I didn't bother.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Overlocked and undervolted to how much ?
I got the idea but it's nice to have the highest score among my friends
You can easily get over 3000 with an ext2 loopback ontop of ext4 plus an overclock. But that's beside the point.
What matters is how it feels and performs day to day, that's more personal opinion. Quadrant is virtually useless IMO.
If you want a "true" quadrant score for what the Galaxy S is capable of without cheating/overclocking, you're probably looking at between 1600-1800 depending on ROM and filesystem.
If you are doing this just to impress your friends...well I don't know who that reflects badly upon, you, your friends, or both. Seriously, give it up, or just resort to comparing d!ck size.
These 2000+ quadrant scores are obtained by abusing the way the thing is tested; changing the file system and setting a loop fools the program into thinking the phone is faster than it is. There are people who've hit quadrant scores of 5000+ just by messing with this filesystem thing, with no real performance difference.
In short: Don't bother with it.
Quadrant Score isnt representatove point performance
This My HTC HD2 with my build adreno2D3D driver project but its just little boost on real graphic performance and with quadrant it will show this so not only I/O partically error benchmark
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
How many examples do we need that Quadrant is not very accurate/useful
Related
For those who have turned their phone into a pocket super computer by following easy instructions from this thread:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=749495
Simple methods to root and lag fix your phone to achieved this
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
The question is:
"What apps are you guys running to push your phone to the limits?
Simple, running Quadrant ... all day long. Just for the kick of it
For me this is the best free up grade ever. Feel like a new phone!
Any apps that use to run a bit slow just fly! Notably the new 1.3.1 facebook and layar.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
I just listen to the MP3 player for 8.5hrs a day all that speed & power & I do squat with it, but its nice to have a fluid phone with zero lag.
I just enjoy a lag free phone.
I put stuff on my home pages, and scroll left and right a lot.
Anybody know any more pretty widgets I can add?
im getting around 2700, with the new lagfix and overclocking cpu
This question really reminds me of computer overclocking community when we had high-scores of benchmark programs and people asked us what we do with our pc.
I just do email-check, surf, watch video clips while I'm outside, Remote Desktop, SSH, keep sliding my homescreens & app drawer(lol), play games and a lot more of things.
And sure, now I'm happy that I picked the right smartphone from mobile store. Feel like it's getting better and better and I think it's not I9000's limit yet, let's think about Froyo with this kind of fix and there maybe another fix or something that would make us more happy. It's worth every penny thanks to people who made these things happen.
All this even before Froyo 2.2 is out. Simply Amazing.
I'm just having a grand old time flying by screens and giggling like a little girl
WTF i only scored 877
not even a 1000!
The lag fix is great...I can only really get up to 1800, but hey...I'm not about to complain now, am I?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
dont get it i get a 3173 on quadrant check, how the hell did i get that high without overclocking?
what kernel are you using?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Deleted...
alenova said:
dont get it i get a 3173 on quadrant check, how the hell did i get that high without overclocking?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Guess you smoke the right stuff!
with 2.3.4 Quadrant scores are touching 1800-2000 with stock...
I use music player + MusixFX eq effects to pimp my sound all the time
I'm with 2.3.4 with CF root and i got this score, not bad
I'm on 2.3.4 too.
And with the right Rom and Kernel you can get this. 3707
Rom and Kernel used in my signature, but sorry you can't get it here.
elita said:
I'm with 2.3.4 with CF root and i got this score, not bad
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes I recently switched to 2.3.4 and installed CF root (enabled ext4) and have the same score!
Just got everything set up after running the manual nooter and did some linpack and quadrant tests to see if there is any improvement over the old Eclair based rom. Here they are for those who care.
Used set CPU to run in performance mode for these tests.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
The linpack mflops looks great. I get 11 on a tweaked out 2.6.29 @800mhz
The quadrant isn't amazing but I think its at least an improvement over the stock 2.6.29 kernel. I get 1800-1900 running my latest test kernel @ 800mhz on Gingerbread(quadrant typically scores less in Gingerbread than Froyo unlike other benchmarks)
Looks like 2.6.32 has some potential.
Holy crap....
This is going to be great once we get kernel source and can undervolt/overlcock this sucka
Performance in general is pretty impressive. I dont know how they managed but at 800MHZ it feels just as smooth as CM7 at 1100. I am REALLY looking forward to getting this overclocked.
Flash is smoother for me in 1.2 than its ever been with any rom regardless of clock speed.
notinterested said:
Performance in general is pretty impressive. I dont know how they managed but at 800MHZ it feels just as smooth as CM7 at 1100. I am REALLY looking forward to getting this overclocked.
Flash is smoother for me in 1.2 than its ever been with any rom regardless of clock speed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is a post somewhere else that includes an APK for the 1.2 Flash so that CM7 users can replace their current install. Apparently it was optimized specifically for the Nook Color and runs better than the Falsh that's available on the market.
dsf3g said:
There is a post somewhere else that includes an APK for the 1.2 Flash so that CM7 users can replace their current install. Apparently it was optimized specifically for the Nook Color and runs better than the Falsh that's available on the market.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My understanding is that it's only true for youtube for some reason, but not for other stuff. I think dal explained it in some thread.
s52m3 said:
My understanding is that it's only true for youtube for some reason, but not for other stuff. I think dal explained it in some thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is true for any site that is optimized for flash on mobile. Youtube is so it is easy to use as an example. However any site can be optimised, it is just a matter of if it is or not. Not sure where i read it either maybe the cm7 user thread?
Masterface7 said:
It is true for any site that is optimized for flash on mobile. Youtube is so it is easy to use as an example. However any site can be optimised, it is just a matter of if it is or not. Not sure where i read it either maybe the cm7 user thread?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is what I've been saying. Unfortunately, the flash B&N uses is worse on videos that are not optimized for mobile. But it performs great on those videos that are for mobile. "Mobile" videos only have 40% CPU usage @ 600mhz. Thats pretty impressive for flash, just wish it applied to all videos.
dalingrin said:
This is what I've been saying. Unfortunately, the flash B&N uses is worse on videos that are not optimized for mobile. But it performs great on those videos that are for mobile. "Mobile" videos only have 40% CPU usage @ 600mhz. Thats pretty impressive for flash, just wish it applied to all videos.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have found the exact opposite to be true. I go to a site that has videos not optimized for mobile and on CM7 they are simply not watchable. With the 1.2 flash its not perfect but certainly better than it is in CM7. Which is surprising because when im on CM7 i run 1100MHZ compared to the 800 with the 1.2 flash.
Anyone else have linpack scores on 1.2 they can post?
Linpack score sux
davidukfl said:
Just got everything set up after running the manual nooter and did some linpack and quadrant tests to see if there is any improvement over the old Eclair based rom. Here they are for those who care.
Used set CPU to run in performance mode for these tests.
LINKPACK
score is 6.056 mflops, in 13.84 seconds, normal resolution 5.68, set cpu 925 mhz max/min running cyanogen 7.0.3 will all processes closed.
QUADRANT STANDARD
score is avg roughly 900 and i'm getting anywhere from 3 to 38 fps.
i've owned n1, m.droid, evo and now dinc that all ran cyanogen and never saw such low scores. i don't know if this nook color is just a little premature or that i'm putting too much emphasis on these scores but i believe there's a 2 ghz tablet around the corner with more horsepower. what do you think?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why did you bump this just to scatter crap?
Running CM7 and OC, I'm hitting quad scores of 2400-3000
Try messing with the NC more before you write it off.
I also agree...
If you are getting scores that low, then something is wrong, wrong, wrong.
I am operating on the CM 7.0.3 and have the thing OC'd at 1300.
I get consistent scores in the 2500 - 2900 range...
Lego
What clock frequencies are you guys using. I am running at 1ghz 59vsel and the battery life isn't as good as 550 mhz (I know it shouldn't be). What frequencies and vsels are you guys using and what's the battery life like.
Also what roms are you guys using. I'm on cyanogenmod7. I was on cronos gingerbread for a while but it doesmt seem to go on standby. Anyone help?
Sent from my Milestone using XDA App
I'm running Bugless Beast (GPA 15 Beta) with a 1.25 ghz low voltage kernel + comp cache enabled. It's rare for me to need to plug in the phone more than once a day to charge. Just google Peter Alfonso. He not only develops the ROMs but the kernels as well. He's doing AOSP Gingerbread builds that I find to be superior to CM7.
Isn't Bugless Beast only for Droid? Because I think he might be asking about Milestone.
skadude66 said:
Isn't Bugless Beast only for Droid? Because I think he might be asking about Milestone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You might be right.
Derp. Disregard my lack of reading comprehension skills.
M1d said:
You might be right.
Derp. Disregard my lack of reading comprehension skills.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sucks, I heard that Peter Alfonso's kernels are pretty beast at battery life.
chevyNo1 5.2, gb, best rom I have used, had bb for a while, cm6.2, droid mod. run at 900mhz, battery is good
Latest build of miui rom is very good. Good battery life. 1000 MHz with smartass governer.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my Milestone using Tapatalk
Thanks for the help so far guys. I've found gingerbread roms rtather slow when it comes to gaming (probably because gingerbread has not been released officially to any sgx530 phones). The new froyo uk update is so damn fast. Its ultra smooth at 550mhz. Has anyone made a custom rom based on the new official 2.2 milestone update?
Sent from my Milestone using XDA App
And where can I find the latest version of miui. The one I can see on google has that can't use wifi and mobile data at the same time
Sent from my Milestone using XDA App
choudu1 said:
And where can I find the latest version of miui. The one I can see on google has that can't use wifi and mobile data at the same time
Sent from my Milestone using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forums.miuiandroid.com/showthread.php?6030-MIUI-1.5.6-Milestone-Deodexed-(Chinese)
http://forums.miuiandroid.com/showthread.php?6048-MIUI-1.5.6-Milestone-English-Pack-1b
Thanks
Sent from my Milestone using XDA App
Whats the gaming and 3d performance like on miui? I want to play dungeon hunter and modern combat 2 on my milestone
Sent from my Milestone using XDA App
Right now I'm running on 1GHz with 66vsel, but still battery life isn't good enough. I tried 59vsel like @choudu1, but phone is unstable and restarts every now and then.
I'm not sure if I need any more power since almost every game I've played runs smoothly and the phone is quite stable. The only games I can't run on decent framerate are Soul Reaver and Tekken 3 via PSX emulator psx4droid.
Running CM7 from 14.06 without problems.
Clocks:
800Mhz vsel 52
700Mhz vsel 44
600Mhz vsel 42
400Mhz vsel 35
250Mhz vsel 25
interactive governor
My battery can stand for two days with (my) normal use(few calls, few sms, some games, some internet using wi-fi, but not often). With heavy use it can stand for (almost) one day.
All day...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Suck it stock IncS.
3651 at that same frequency.
my loss of points was SD card because I'm using a class 2 16gb card, not the 8gb class 4 that came with it.
Different benchmarks as I took them a few weeks ago, but could be interesting for the sake of comparison anyways. The first picture was taken at stock clock speed using the Quadrant benchmark. The second was taken @ 1209MHz and the third @ 1401MHz I believe (I didn't take note so it may vary +- 100MHz). I wasn't brave enough to go any higher Although I know that the Tiamat kernel could allow you to go up to 2.0GHz which is just ridiculous. Setup shown in my signature.
ARHD 1.1.7 and Quadrant Advanced.
itsbeertimenow said:
All day...
Suck it stock IncS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was wondering what ROM you were using on that test?
Sent from my Incredible S using xda premium
AnTuTu
Quadrant
More recent
this competition may lead to some bricked devices..anyways will make a good paper weight...
Sent from my inspire 4g using cm7 n259
to all the benchmark freaks:
i tested several roms using antutu benchmark. when i compare my results with other IncS results i get less points (between 2600-2900). the main difference i saw are the points CPU integer (~740 , but others guys had ~1000) and CPU floatpoints (~320). tried on cleam roms and roms i tweaked with beater etc..
is it possible that i harmed my CPU with OC/UV in the past?
are my UV settings restored to default after flashing a new rom?
shiningarmor said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not an incredible s, and if it is, congratulations you have the worlds fastest Incs.
itsbeertimenow said:
That's not an incredible s, and if it is, congratulations you have the worlds fastest Incs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All I know is that guy has an Incredible S phone and today isn't national trolling day, right? So this even is actually possible, but still very hard to believe. Even though he managed to overclock it's GPU then it's more reasonable...
So here's my benchmark http://www.upload.ee/image/1850697/2011-11-29_22-45-30.png -.-
shiningarmor said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
specifications please. thats really amazing bechmark !
highKo said:
to all the benchmark freaks:
i tested several roms using antutu benchmark. when i compare my results with other IncS results i get less points (between 2600-2900). the main difference i saw are the points CPU integer (~740 , but others guys had ~1000) and CPU floatpoints (~320). tried on cleam roms and roms i tweaked with beater etc..
is it possible that i harmed my CPU with OC/UV in the past?
are my UV settings restored to default after flashing a new rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
tried the new virtuous rom now, still same results :-/
highKo said:
tried the new virtuous rom now, still same results :-/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The uv/oc setting s are always restored to the kernel default once your phone is restarted unless you have your app set to "set on boot" which is never a good idea as bricks are made this way. And yes when you flash a new Rom it installs a new kernel and your setting s are set to the kernels default until you set up your oc app from wihtin your Rom.
I always failed on 1.5Ghz ~ 2.0Ghz. It was stop working and freeze. Anyone succeed?
keroro430 said:
I always failed on 1.5Ghz ~ 2.0Ghz. It was stop working and freeze. Anyone succeed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That bench was clocked at 1804 it tottally depends on which Rom your using and which kernel. That was cm nihtlies and I can't remember the kernel, all I remember was the title contained the words "lightning fast". I've used roms with kernels that won't let you surpass 1.1 ghz and I've used ones that let you o.c. to 2.1. Weather or not your phone locks up is a different story. It doesn't seem to matter if its sense or aosp as I've had both clocked over 1.8. Generally the phone will freeze if you have uncompatible settings and it tries to run more than 4 processes at once.
here's mine.
Cyanogenmod 7 Nightly + Lord Clockan's kernel also ICS theme really looks great.
This bench is at 1.6Ghz but normally it's set to ~1.2Ghz and get almost 3 days battery life.
Incredible S is an incredible phone!
LG OPTIMUS 2X ICS 4.0.3 Alpha kang 15
Quadrant: 2503
Antutu: 5373
nenomark2: 27.7
Linpack: 47.166
my quadrant ended up at 2550
with gingerbread I had 4100, damn how i miss that overcloaking.
* Edit
Running ICS now with 1.4GHz and scored 3374 on quadrant
This is my O2X.
ICS Nova HD+ R7-17 Ironkrnl,32MB RAMhack
1312 MHz
----------------------------
AnTuTu : 6684
Quadrant : 3013
Linpack: 78.669
________________________
1500 MHz
----------------------------
AnTuTu : 7372
Quadrant : 3467
Linpack: 88.632
________________________
Quadrant 3152
Antutu 6377
Nova R7-17 + Ironkrnl, 1312 Mghz OC
Nearly double my old Captivate
zereke said:
my quadrant ended up at 2550
with gingerbread I had 4100, damn how i miss that overcloaking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant app is updated with new score now...
It gives lesser than what it used to give earlier
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA
My score
ROM :ICS 4.0.3 Alpha kang 15
Kernal : Ironkrnl 48mb RAM Hack
CPU : 1.5Ghz
Quadrant : 3545
Antutu : 7003
Nenamark2 : 33.7fps
Linpack Mutli-thread : 83.9MFLOPS
Here my benchs as Screenshots
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA
world_of_ursus said:
Here my benchs as Screenshots View attachment 939209View attachment 939210View attachment 939211
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A what clock speed?
almighty15 said:
A what clock speed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It must be 1,3 or 1,4 GHz. It would be too much for lower frequency.
greate scores guys. im thinking to overclock to. but im waried about battery life. is there difference in battery life? and what kernel to use for overclocking with ICS rom kangs from owain94
My bad... wrong section.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA
oleg1981 said:
greate scores guys. im thinking to overclock to. but im waried about battery life. is there difference in battery life? and what kernel to use for overclocking with ICS rom kangs from owain94
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've never noticed lower battery life after overclocking. Only when you use full power for longer time it drains battery faster.
About kernel for Kang you should use ironkrnl. Everything important you can find here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1517301
Afaik, overclocking it's actually just changing the maximum clock frequency, right? Which is only used according to CPU use. If your phone is on idle it will use the minimum configured CPU frequency, so it would not have an impact on battery drainage, only when you're doing CPU demanding tasks.
However, other than battery drainage, it will increase the temperature your CPU reaches when performing these tasks, which might lead to instability. As I've never come across an app or game that lagged, that is why I don't overclock, I don't see the point in risking CPU overheat.
Has anyone seen any difference while playing a game or using an app from regular clocked to an overclocked CPU?