Overclock for Darky´s v10 RC6? - Galaxy S I9000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

I want to overclock my SGS, and I´m running Darky´s ROM v10, Gingebread 2.3.3
Wich kernel should I use? Thanks in advance :3

I recommend Talon Kernel ( http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1057705 ). It doesn't have a few usefull for me features (like swap or compcache) but work perfectly. It's very stable.

Gerdal said:
I recommend Talon Kernel ( http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1057705 ). It doesn't have a few usefull for me features (like swap or compcache) but work perfectly. It's very stable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sounds good, but any chances on overclocking over 1.2 GHz?

If u wish to do that i'd reccomend you to switch to a cm7 based rom and install tk-glitch kernel, that supports overclock up over to 1.5GHz
PD: si, soy el guzmanus de eol, el mundo es un pañuelo xD

I had Darky´s v10 RC6 and talon Kernel and it worked incredibly.
Regards.

Actually all ROMs based on Cyanogen's mod are very unstable. Actually they are only for ppl who know how to create workarounds (or repair) some of problems. I don't recommend these roms and kernels. Maybe in June/July these ROMs will be enough stable to daily usage
From what I know actually developers of Talon Kernel are working towards increased overclocking. They created patch that support overclocking to 1,3 GHz but it was deleted day after (probably it was bugged ). I think we should wait.
Btw... Is it worth to overclock CPU? Actually all apps and games can't fully utilize 1 GHz CPU.

Gerdal said:
Actually all ROMs based on Cyanogen's mod are very unstable. Actually they are only for ppl who know how to create workarounds (or repair) some of problems. I don't recommend these roms and kernels. Maybe in June/July these ROMs will be enough stable to daily usage
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is not true at all! I've been using CM7 for a week now OC'd at 1.5 without any issues. The only niggle was setting up the voltages for the OC, but other than that it's very stable and doesn't get the credit it deserves!
Also, the devs are very helpful and have their own Q&A thread if anything does for wrong (which for me it hasn't).
It's defiantly been stable enough for daily use IMHO since the 06/05Nightly build. & battery life isn't that bad either (~70% of stock) which I expect can only improve with releases esp as the devs admit the sleep code is a bit faulty.
I'm not saying everyone should jump on it, but I wouldn't just dismiss straight away. Give it a try & you may be pleasantly surprised
Anyway, shouldn't this be in the Q&A section and not development?

I used CM7 nightly build a few days ago and It wasn't working properly. I'm checking every week a new builds looking for "stable" version. I have problems with making a call to anyone, problems with mount external microsd card and more. I haven't tested OC because I don't need it. It's true that CM devs are very helpfull I'm still waiting for version which will be stable for me, and all features which I need will work properly. I have CM ROM on my old HTC G1, and this ROM was amazing so I still wait for stable build for SGS
Higadeb said:
Anyway, shouldn't this be in the Q&A section and not development?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. It should

Gerdal said:
I used CM7 nightly build a few days ago and It wasn't working properly. I'm checking every week a new builds looking for "stable" version. I have problems with making a call to anyone, problems with mount external microsd card and more. I haven't tested OC because I don't need it. It's true that CM devs are very helpfull I'm still waiting for version which will be stable for me, and all features which I need will work properly. I have CM ROM on my old HTC G1, and this ROM was amazing so I still wait for stable build for SGS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's curious. Did you check the Kernel wiper you're supposed to use each time you flash/upgrade? It supposedly gets rid of most issues. Anyway, I guess maybe I just got lucky with it working well for me then.

Hmmm... I will check again Maybe I forgot about it this time

Gerdal said:
Hmmm... I will check again Maybe I forgot about it this time
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Those problems you talk about are mostly produced because of wrong bootloaders, specially if you come from a gingerbread ROM. Try flashing froyo bootloaders and then using CM7, it is awesomely stable

Related

[Q] cm7.1 kernel

The installed kernel on my phone now is grj22 which it came with the cm 7.1 so can I change the kernel with no problems bcoz the 3g is so slow with these and had some problems like force to close in some applications.
So which is the best solution 4 me, and how to solve it
CM...
maj85 said:
The installed kernel on my phone now is grj22 which it came with the cm 7.1 so can I change the kernel with no problems bcoz the 3g is so slow with these and had some problems like force to close in some applications.
So which is the best solution 4 me, and how to solve it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can check InterRaven's or Tiamat's kernel if they support CM7.1. If they do, you can flash it to replace CM's kernel.
However, I personally think the best solution is to wait for stable version of CM 7.1.
maj85 said:
The installed kernel on my phone now is grj22 which it came with the cm 7.1 so can I change the kernel with no problems bcoz the 3g is so slow with these and had some problems like force to close in some applications.
So which is the best solution 4 me, and how to solve it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've got very good results using an Intersect Reaven Kernel with CM 7.0. You could give it a go, and if it is not what you are expecting, just go back... so make a NandDroid backup in case you need it.
Good Luck!!
Moved to proper forum.
You need to know one thing first, GRJ22 is not the version of the kernel. It is actually the build number of the Android System.
I personally would recommend IR kernel, and set it to run using Smartass. Saves battery, while not comprising your user experience.
Sent from my Nexus One using Tapatalk

[Q] Recommend me a ROM please

Hi there.
I'm new here and new to the Android platform aswell. I recently bought a Galaxy Mini GT-5570B. I run Gingerbread 2.3.4 on a stock rom (JJKQ5). I just rooted it using this guide: (THANKS!!)
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1576202
Now, I'm looking to apply a ROM. I want the most stable one, which has only the very basic stuff. I want my phone to run as fast as possible with at least bugs or crashes. After reading a bit, I found out (correct me if I'm wrong) that CM7 is the best one to suit me.
However, I still don't know which to apply!
I found 3 topics that I think are the best, but I still don't know which of them is stable or the fastest.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1475504
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1572092
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1554099
Please, help me pick one or suggest another one you find working good.
Also, a very simple guide to apply it would be cool
As far as I understand, all I need to do is install ClockworkMod and just boot into it and install from SD, just like I applied my root. Is this correct?
Sorry for these nab questions, I know you probably heard it a few times (Tried searching for a similar topic, couldn't find anything that satisfies me).
Thanks for any help!
Egozy said:
Hi there.
I'm new here and new to the Android platform aswell. I recently bought a Galaxy Mini GT-5570B. I run Gingerbread 2.3.4 on a stock rom (JJKQ5). I just rooted it using this guide: (THANKS!!)
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1576202
Now, I'm looking to apply a ROM. I want the most stable one, which has only the very basic stuff. I want my phone to run as fast as possible with at least bugs or crashes. After reading a bit, I found out (correct me if I'm wrong) that CM7 is the best one to suit me.
However, I still don't know which to apply!
I found 3 topics that I think are the best, but I still don't know which of them is stable or the fastest.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1475504
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1572092
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1554099
Please, help me pick one or suggest another one you find working good.
Also, a very simple guide to apply it would be cool
As far as I understand, all I need to do is install ClockworkMod and just boot into it and install from SD, just like I applied my root. Is this correct?
Sorry for these nab questions, I know you probably heard it a few times (Tried searching for a similar topic, couldn't find anything that satisfies me).
Thanks for any help!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi. Yeah the people who are longer active here have heard these question a lot. But everybody here was a beginner so thats no problem.
You did some search yourself so you have already read the most.
All you have to do is flash cwm via odin. There is an older one 4.0.0.5 or a newer 5.x.x.x. I recommend you the older one.
After that you can use cwm and install custom roms. There are plenty you can choose of. As I used a mini my favorite was the cyanogenmod from mebitek. Try the last version or the one before.
Good luck.
Gesendet von meinem WT19i mit Tapatalk
i would recommend cm7.i think its stable,its fast,it offers a lot of customization you would love to.It has got tonnes of themeing options.Heres the latest unofficial stable nightly cm7.2.0 rc5.7 build.
http://www.mediafire.com/?ax5zfbawdgkdbis
[hotfix] www.mediafire.com/?0i9v2ysc3p5vls4
Hit Thanks if it helps!
Fast rom, benchark 2011
Hi there,
try rom - RAZRUI V6
Also flash Adrenaline boost and adrenaline engine
(adrenaline engine v2)
games run extremely smoothe, the home launcher is not the greatest... but i use ilauncher and makes it very nice!
spam
i recomande to you my rom http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=24919441#post24919441
[ NO overlocked ] i use it work perfect tree it and feedback Last releas V2 thanks i now also here
Vote sonyHD Tonight gamerz edition release
Sent from my GT-S5570 using XDA
I recommend CyanogenMod 7. It's the best Custom ROM out there for Android.
Try the official one & nightly builds.
Very content about Chocobread. Stable, fast, compatible with adrenaline boost, builtin app2sd and the owner will release a completely new update to it in a few weeks probably.
Thanks for all the comments, I installed official CyanogenMod 7.2RC1 and I'm very happy with it!
for the best performance try this rom:http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1593047
Its very fast, smooth....camera working and the best one for games.
Vote
Vote and Recommend Andro-id v3.3.1 by Tj-Style latest Andro-id ROM for galaxy mini , it's stable , Oveclock 864mhz , Cool Amination , etc . But need replace PATCHED Camera.apk VIA Root Explorer , Than ur Camera still can work notmally . ANYWAY !!! THUMBS UP for TJ_Style 's WORK
I recommend you cyanogenmod7 by mebitek stable and fast
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda premium
kenjilucas19 said:
I recommend you cyanogenmod7 by mebitek stable and fast
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, that's my pick also, there are two builds from pure CM based on Mebitek's (The galaxymini and the nightly (I guess weekly now ;-) )
I installed the latest weekly on top of the Galaxymini (that hasn't been updated since march 18) using the deodexed version without wiping data and it's working great. You may try the odexed version for space and maybe bit more speed but believe me, this is the smoothest ROM I've tried (Used squadzone's, chocobread, emanon, more, etc.) but this one hasn't crashed a single time. I use Overclock to 729 + slaidyboost and WOW, great ROM. Battery is not that bad as it can last as much as stock (maybe even a bit more).
Andro-ID v3.2+Squad's kernel
KoperKiller said:
Andro-ID v3.2+Squad's kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Andro-id 3.3.1 is out too..try that too its great
tisazalay said:
Yes, that's my pick also, there are two builds from pure CM based on Mebitek's (The galaxymini and the nightly (I guess weekly now ;-) )
I installed the latest weekly on top of the Galaxymini (that hasn't been updated since march 18) using the deodexed version without wiping data and it's working great. You may try the odexed version for space and maybe bit more speed but believe me, this is the smoothest ROM I've tried (Used squadzone's, chocobread, emanon, more, etc.) but this one hasn't crashed a single time. I use Overclock to 729 + slaidyboost and WOW, great ROM. Battery is not that bad as it can last as much as stock (maybe even a bit more).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
have you tried cm7 by kittenlinux based on mebitek's build? it should be good, because kitten merge it with the lastest update from cm source..
I wanna try it, but until now, I don't find any good review from it
i already use all of custom ROM.
and the best is stock ROM ! lol
tisazalay said:
Yes, that's my pick also, there are two builds from pure CM based on Mebitek's (The galaxymini and the nightly (I guess weekly now ;-) )
I installed the latest weekly on top of the Galaxymini (that hasn't been updated since march 18) using the deodexed version without wiping data and it's working great. You may try the odexed version for space and maybe bit more speed but believe me, this is the smoothest ROM I've tried (Used squadzone's, chocobread, emanon, more, etc.) but this one hasn't crashed a single time. I use Overclock to 729 + slaidyboost and WOW, great ROM. Battery is not that bad as it can last as much as stock (maybe even a bit more).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you tried sony hd rom i think it has a great ui
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda premium

[28-APRIL] [STOCK-KERNEL] guestekrnL Platin Hybrid v1.0 | 2.6.32.55 - CM7/v10E/v20Q

~ Ready for one more revolution? ~
guestekrnL Platin Hybrid v1.0​
Have you ever asked yourself, why the f*ck it is neccesary that we poor stock users have to use an old outdated linux kernel based on a much older kernel version than an up-to-date CM7 kernel? Well, we don't have to any longer
Stock v20Q kernel is based on linux v2.6.32.9
This kernel is based on linux v2.6.32.55
This is a difference of 46 revisions.
Specials:
First O2X Stock kernel completely based on latest CM7 kernel
Linux base thus is 2.6.32.55 instead of 2.6.32.9 like all other stock kernels
All features have been ported correctly, vibration, brightness setting, auto backlight, led buttons, WIFI tethering, USB tethering, GPS, USB Storage, everything is working
All features known from normal guestekrnL including the GuesteOC app are included and useable
Hybrid parts are taken from both v10E kernel and v20Q kernel
ultrasmooth
A CM7 kernel has never before been successfully ported to 100% stock P990/O2X compatibility.
I might even port other CM7 kernels like VorkKernel to stock in future.
Enjoy the first release.
And attention: Of course it is possible, that the kernel is instable or something does not work. So please report how it works for you.
Download: http://androtransfer.com/?developer=gueste&folder=guestekrnL Platin Hybrid
Make backups. I'm not responsible for any damages.
Ehheh... You're a crazy genius
Sent from DjangoManouche!
wow! this really is evolution! first you combined stock&cm7 hybrid! and now stock kernel&cm7 kernel hybrid! 2thumbsup hybrid master!
Wow, devs in the o2x are really talented. Every day there is something better and better. I will must get me another o2x for testing, currently have two of them, but it is not enough for all of candy`s coming every day.
Very good kernel!
First impression: Very smooth and seems stable, there are just a few little lags in scrolling and reaction time of softkeys.
you are the craziest Dev on Earth;-) but a Genius
Edit:
I Build my Rom now with the new kernl,and must say the same like Flix,have a little lags at scrolling,the Final and last betas are better
Testing kernel.
Rom.. .
Homero opti3D 1.4
Enviado desde mi LG-P990 usando Tapatalk 2
cojo11 said:
you are the craziest Dev on Earth;-) but a Genius
Edit:
I Build my Rom now with the new kernl,and must say the same like Flix,have a little lags at scrolling,the Final and last betas are better
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thx, I'll upload a smoother version soon!
This will be the last for today and maybe this weekend
Stefan Gündhör said:
Thx, I'll upload a smoother version soon!
This will be the last for today and maybe this weekend
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so the last for today will be the smoother version right?
Sent from my LG-P990 using Tapatalk 2
It's the best news I've had in a long time.
I have no words for you, just say you are amazing.
Installed and tested, all OK so far
Flix123 said:
Very good kernel!
First impression: Very smooth and seems stable, there are just a few little lags in scrolling and reaction time of softkeys.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
After few hours of using, my impression is exactly the same. Very smooth and stable. Battery consumption seems a little high, but it is hard to say without more using/testing.
This have all features of stock guestekrnl? gueste OC ?
On miui i have a problem, sd card error ... is it compatible with miui? I had restore a backup and all work fine Fyi
Wow really nice, soon a 3.0.x kernel on stock?
With so many talented dev on O2X, I'm really happy to have one.
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA
the screen stays frozen for a few seconds once every now and then and sometimes gets out of the keyboard when typing.
Enviado desde mi LG-P990 usando Tapatalk 2
Just got one article by droidphile about different parameters of kernel. Although written in context to Kernels developed for SGS-II but great for general reading too.I am going through the article and trying to get a primary knowledge of everything. Noobs like me may take a plunge. Great compilation by droidphile BTW. Thanks to him.
Link : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1369817
Now the big question.
HID devices such as Bluetooth mini keyboard work perfectly in CM7 ROM. In stock ROMs do not work.
You could research in this line?
I leave an interesting link http://groups.google.com/group/0xlab-devel/browse_thread/thread/e310043d73791d2a/c05e0d21291022e9
THX
Now I'm curious and interested to know.
Does the newer kernel v2.6.32.55 bring any significant improvements or new features over the older v2.6.32.9 kernel?
And is there any reason why LG did not update the kernel whereas for other brands (for example Samsung) they did?
wow,great baater life with the new kernel
Ok,in only write some SMS,have 1call und always a look on the Phone but,looks great.
Right Picture with the Gueste Final
Left the new Platin
Very nice what is your rom cojo11 ?

SGS+ I9001 Question

Hi everyone in this forum,
Just a quick question, a friend of mine owns a SGS+ I9001 and he's running stock rom, I wanted to install a custom rom for him, (I know I'm not supposed to ask these kind of questions) which rom do you recommend me, it needs to be as stable, fast and battery friendly as possible, I hope you could help me, thank you very much before hand!
Have a nice one!
thecrab93 said:
Hi everyone in this forum,
Just a quick question, a friend of mine owns a SGS+ I9001 and he's running stock rom, I wanted to install a custom rom for him, (I know I'm not supposed to ask these kind of questions) which rom do you recommend me, it needs to be as stable, fast and battery friendly as possible, I hope you could help me, thank you very much before hand!
Have a nice one!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All CM9 based roms are stable. Also the CM10 based roms are stable but they might have some bugs.
temeritas said:
All CM9 based roms are stable. Also the CM10 based roms are stable but they might have some bugs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you very much, do you recommend me any in particular and if so, why? Thanks again.
thecrab93 said:
Thank you very much, do you recommend me any in particular and if so, why? Thanks again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using Ivendor's CM10 alpha 6 now. It works very well. But you should read in the SGS+ section what rom is the best for yourself. For myself Ivendor's CM10 is the best because I have now JB working on my phone like on a nexus device.
I agree that ivendor's Kernel are one of the most snappier ever so far.
Thank you guys, thank you very much, just another question, is ivendors CM10 stable enough for a person that knows very little about android to use as a daily driver? Thanks again!
thecrab93 said:
Thank you guys, thank you very much, just another question, is ivendors CM10 stable enough for a person that knows very little about android to use as a daily driver? Thanks again!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NO, it's not perfectly stable, because it's an ALPHA release, however most of us use it as a daily ROM. One or two random reboots in one month, some minor freezes - I think it's worth it, the performance is outstanding, especially with some 3.x.x. kernels. Anyway, wait for RC version, if you want stock rom - like stability.
You could also try one of the CM9 releases. They've been around longer and are probably more stable than the CM10 ones.
I'm using arco's release (can be found http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1650615) which has only very few quirks left. The only ones I run into sometimes are a problem with the compass (something strange is going on with the magnetic field sensor) and GMail / Facebook occasionally display only a white screen (which can be fixed by killing and restarting the app) (which can be mapped onto long-pressing the back button).
There's also ivendor's release, which has some other fixes but hasn't been updated for quite some time. There's also a number of remixes, an AOSP release by broodplank, AOKP, and MIUI.
Basicly, there's a list here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1901212
The JB's are bound to have some bugs, don't flash them if you don't plan on updating as well. ICS is probably rather stable and most GB releases are probably stable as well.
Fastest: probably AOSP (so brood's release) and JB (project butter and all)
Most battery-friendly: GB
Stable: anything but JB
temeritas said:
I'm using Ivendor's CM10 alpha 6 now. It works very well. But you should read in the SGS+ section what rom is the best for yourself. For myself Ivendor's CM10 is the best because I have now JB working on my phone like on a nexus device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mikroos said:
I agree that ivendor's Kernel are one of the most snappier ever so far.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Jacol82 said:
NO, it's not perfectly stable, because it's an ALPHA release, however most of us use it as a daily ROM. One or two random reboots in one month, some minor freezes - I think it's worth it, the performance is outstanding, especially with some 3.x.x. kernels. Anyway, wait for RC version, if you want stock rom - like stability.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Marshian said:
You could also try one of the CM9 releases. They've been around longer and are probably more stable than the CM10 ones.
I'm using arco's release (can be found http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1650615) which has only very few quirks left. The only ones I run into sometimes are a problem with the compass (something strange is going on with the magnetic field sensor) and GMail / Facebook occasionally display only a white screen (which can be fixed by killing and restarting the app) (which can be mapped onto long-pressing the back button).
There's also ivendor's release, which has some other fixes but hasn't been updated for quite some time. There's also a number of remixes, an AOSP release by broodplank, AOKP, and MIUI.
Basicly, there's a list here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1901212
The JB's are bound to have some bugs, don't flash them if you don't plan on updating as well. ICS is probably rather stable and most GB releases are probably stable as well.
Fastest: probably AOSP (so brood's release) and JB (project butter and all)
Most battery-friendly: GB
Stable: anything but JB
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok guys, thanks so much, I think I'll stick with arco's cm9 release so my friend can try it for a while and see if it's ok, thanks again

Lets talk about CM10 and ICS - with POLL

Hi peeps!
So... moving away and not spam the other dev and general threads, I just wanted to open a new one where we can discuss about the differences between CM10 on old bootloader (cause the other roms are soooo 2011 ) and the new STOCK ICS great tuned roms on NEW BOOTLOADER
I was using DM v30b ICS for a long time and I was pretty satisfied! But after I saw the call bug fix on the official CM10, I didn't even think about it and replaced it
Not that the DMs version isnt fine, but I was remembering that the CM10 version on old bootloader was pretty awesome!
Im using the CM10 official and the only thing I would say against it is the battery life Everything else is awesome!
P.S. This thread is not for DEVs, cause I dont want to offend anyone with posts like "This ROM is much better than this".
Every dev here is FUK*n AWESOME and the jobs they do are amazing... Be honest... before our devs started to tune the phones, we would all be on some freakin apple ****s! (sorry for my language!).
Keep up that good job and ignore our post and threads, its just sharing opinions between consumers
PUT yOUR OPINIONS IN HERE RIGHT NOW !
That's right, Official CM10 is Awesome since LG release their source code. But I will be honest, I tried the first Stock ICS v30a and I was not happy with it because of the speed...even if we have 2 cores. Then I return to cm10...but since we have official source code, the devs start making custom kernel which are really AWESOME, seriously. So, I'm now on cm10 (old bt) with Pidocchio kernel (old bt) for about 5-6 weeks...and it rocks. :good:
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda premium
django manouche x1.2 is good, it has ios 7 onboard
CM10 for new bootloader by pengus77
Flashed it yeastarday and the battery life is amazing.
I think cm 10 is pretty awesome, the only thing holding it back for me using it is the battery drain
And LG's official ICS was ***t if u need something thats stable ( i know it doesn't really belong here ) i think u need to back to GB like temasek's builds, but that's my meaning
pengus77 is doing a very nice job. and like marsgod took his fix to gerrit to be reviewed by cm team and they included into official repository, i think pengus77 job should too. in that way, no need to continue with the new bootloader cause is a waste of space and a mess for everybody to move there with nvflash. id we can continue using our gb bootloader and partition layout, that one we used during about 1 year, why not continue if it is working alright? my vote for cm10 official with those all changes commited into cm repository.
I'm using original locked and unrooted 30B in Italy even it is made for ESA region.
I think that this rom is near to be a definitive stable rom: very smooth and fast, no problems except for a battery drain still high (20 hours autonomy with 40% wifi); the camera could be better, too.
I'm very happy of it and I'm waiting for the same LG release for EU.
I never used overclocking or custom kernels even if I tested most of the custom roms available here on XDA. I must say that I never found a real advantage nor stability testing these roms, maybe now the time for them is near to be over.
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda app-developers app
CM10 for new bootloader by pengus77 for me
No bug, just perfect!
thanks for the opinions! I hope that the new ones here are gonna appreciate it!
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda app-developers app
I am still on Temasek's CM7 as I needed long battery and rock solid/stable operation... Waiting for our CM10 team to fix the battery drain (old boot loader) and I'll take the dive
I have a question about the call bug: when does it usually show up?
I have never experienced it, but at the same time none of my calls are ever longer than 5 minutes.
I'm still on a really early version of CM10, and I've never run into the call bug.
Only problem really is the WiFi drain. Has that been fixed? I haven't been keeping up with the latest nightlies.
deewhy said:
I have a question about the call bug: when does it usually show up?
I have never experienced it, but at the same time none of my calls are ever longer than 5 minutes.
I'm still on a really early version of CM10, and I've never run into the call bug.
Only problem really is the WiFi drain. Has that been fixed? I haven't been keeping up with the latest nightlies.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The call bug was said to be caused by a race condition - meaning it creeps up unexpectedly depending on the activity done with the phone in that timeframe.
As for wifi drain, flash the kernel tonyp compiled (containing pengus77's fix), onto any CM10 nightly that came out after the V30a sources dropped (basically December onwards).
You really should get a nightly from December onwards - a lot of things, not just the call bug, were fixed or improved along the way. I'm on 01/03 and having an improved experience over the SU660-based sources.
CM10 by arcee is very stable for me with self-compiled kernel of 24mb ramhack and patches from wkpark(including the lg twin boot logo fix). Very smooth and no BSODs and call bug. Just waiting for cm10.1 to be released by arcee.
aldyu said:
CM10 by arcee is very stable for me with self-compiled kernel of 24mb ramhack and patches from wkpark(including the lg twin boot logo fix). Very smooth and no BSODs and call bug. Just waiting for cm10.1 to be released by arcee.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sound pretty good to me, why dont you share the kernel with US consumers
any news about rhe arm kernel from nicholas?
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda app-developers app
machoman1337 said:
The call bug was said to be caused by a race condition - meaning it creeps up unexpectedly depending on the activity done with the phone in that timeframe.
As for wifi drain, flash the kernel tonyp compiled (containing pengus77's fix), onto any CM10 nightly that came out after the V30a sources dropped (basically December onwards).
You really should get a nightly from December onwards - a lot of things, not just the call bug, were fixed or improved along the way. I'm on 01/03 and having an improved experience over the SU660-based sources.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just to clarify, I flash the ROM first and then flash the kernel afterwards? Do I need to re-flash the kernel every time I flash a new nightly?
deewhy said:
Just to clarify, I flash the ROM first and then flash the kernel afterwards? Do I need to re-flash the kernel every time I flash a new nightly?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes and yes (since a new nightly will overwrite whatever kernel you have).
machoman1337 said:
Yes and yes (since a new nightly will overwrite whatever kernel you have).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks!
And just one last question:
So the callbug is fixed on the newest nightlies, but the WiFi fix has not been submitted/merged yet? So if I want the WiFi fix I still have to flash the kernel tonyp compiled, which I'm assuming is this: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=36032539&postcount=661 ?
just like that bro
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda app-developers app
just try CM10 by pengus77,it's freaking awesome.Nice power saving and no call bug.

Categories

Resources