Database Develop

[28-APRIL] [STOCK-KERNEL] guestekrnL Platin Hybrid v1.0 | 2.6.32.55 - CM7/v10E/v20Q

~ Ready for one more revolution? ~
guestekrnL Platin Hybrid v1.0​
Have you ever asked yourself, why the f*ck it is neccesary that we poor stock users have to use an old outdated linux kernel based on a much older kernel version than an up-to-date CM7 kernel? Well, we don't have to any longer
Stock v20Q kernel is based on linux v2.6.32.9
This kernel is based on linux v2.6.32.55
This is a difference of 46 revisions.
Specials:
First O2X Stock kernel completely based on latest CM7 kernel
Linux base thus is 2.6.32.55 instead of 2.6.32.9 like all other stock kernels
All features have been ported correctly, vibration, brightness setting, auto backlight, led buttons, WIFI tethering, USB tethering, GPS, USB Storage, everything is working
All features known from normal guestekrnL including the GuesteOC app are included and useable
Hybrid parts are taken from both v10E kernel and v20Q kernel
ultrasmooth
A CM7 kernel has never before been successfully ported to 100% stock P990/O2X compatibility.
I might even port other CM7 kernels like VorkKernel to stock in future.
Enjoy the first release.
And attention: Of course it is possible, that the kernel is instable or something does not work. So please report how it works for you.
Download: http://androtransfer.com/?developer=gueste&folder=guestekrnL Platin Hybrid
Make backups. I'm not responsible for any damages.

Ehheh... You're a crazy genius
Sent from DjangoManouche!

wow! this really is evolution! first you combined stock&cm7 hybrid! and now stock kernel&cm7 kernel hybrid! 2thumbsup hybrid master!

Wow, devs in the o2x are really talented. Every day there is something better and better. I will must get me another o2x for testing, currently have two of them, but it is not enough for all of candy`s coming every day.

Very good kernel!
First impression: Very smooth and seems stable, there are just a few little lags in scrolling and reaction time of softkeys.

you are the craziest Dev on Earth;-) but a Genius
Edit:
I Build my Rom now with the new kernl,and must say the same like Flix,have a little lags at scrolling,the Final and last betas are better

Testing kernel.
Rom.. .
Homero opti3D 1.4
Enviado desde mi LG-P990 usando Tapatalk 2

cojo11 said:
you are the craziest Dev on Earth;-) but a Genius
Edit:
I Build my Rom now with the new kernl,and must say the same like Flix,have a little lags at scrolling,the Final and last betas are better
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thx, I'll upload a smoother version soon!
This will be the last for today and maybe this weekend

Stefan Gündhör said:
Thx, I'll upload a smoother version soon!
This will be the last for today and maybe this weekend
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so the last for today will be the smoother version right?
Sent from my LG-P990 using Tapatalk 2

It's the best news I've had in a long time.
I have no words for you, just say you are amazing.
Installed and tested, all OK so far

Flix123 said:
Very good kernel!
First impression: Very smooth and seems stable, there are just a few little lags in scrolling and reaction time of softkeys.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
After few hours of using, my impression is exactly the same. Very smooth and stable. Battery consumption seems a little high, but it is hard to say without more using/testing.

This have all features of stock guestekrnl? gueste OC ?

On miui i have a problem, sd card error ... is it compatible with miui? I had restore a backup and all work fine Fyi

Wow really nice, soon a 3.0.x kernel on stock?
With so many talented dev on O2X, I'm really happy to have one.
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA

the screen stays frozen for a few seconds once every now and then and sometimes gets out of the keyboard when typing.
Enviado desde mi LG-P990 usando Tapatalk 2

Just got one article by droidphile about different parameters of kernel. Although written in context to Kernels developed for SGS-II but great for general reading too.I am going through the article and trying to get a primary knowledge of everything. Noobs like me may take a plunge. Great compilation by droidphile BTW. Thanks to him.
Link : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1369817

Now the big question.
HID devices such as Bluetooth mini keyboard work perfectly in CM7 ROM. In stock ROMs do not work.
You could research in this line?
I leave an interesting link http://groups.google.com/group/0xlab-devel/browse_thread/thread/e310043d73791d2a/c05e0d21291022e9
THX

Now I'm curious and interested to know.
Does the newer kernel v2.6.32.55 bring any significant improvements or new features over the older v2.6.32.9 kernel?
And is there any reason why LG did not update the kernel whereas for other brands (for example Samsung) they did?

wow,great baater life with the new kernel
Ok,in only write some SMS,have 1call und always a look on the Phone but,looks great.
Right Picture with the Gueste Final
Left the new Platin

Very nice what is your rom cojo11 ?

CM10 or CM9?

Hey guys, I'm thinking of compiling a CM ROM from source next month (have to wait for data cap to reset) and was wondering what you guys would prefer, a significantly more stable CM9, or a more buggy (and more headaches for me) CM10 ROM? I personally would prefer to do a CM9 ROM since it would be easier to support and fix bugs on, since we already have relatively stable, working builds of AOSP ICS. CM10 would be great as well, but it would be much harder for me to support, since I would be the second dev for the Inc S to build a JB ROM from source for us. I just don't think I have the know-how to be the only one working on it, and the only one fixing bugs and whatnot, without any already working source code to view and compare.
So I could compile CM9.2 stable, and we would have the latest CM9 code using kaijura's IceColdSandwich as a reference. I would have an easier time supporting the ICS ROM since I would have working source code to compare and review. Also, it would be significantly more stable simply due to the fact that multiple devs for our device have already worked on it. I'm sure I'd be able to fix bugs and support it fairly easily, other devs are the best resource around
Or I could compile a CM10 ROM. I would have to take device proprietary files from nik's JB ROM's, which would mean my compiled ROM would share a lot of the same bugs our current JB ROM's already have. I could support and fix bugs in CM10, it would just take longer and be harder to do. Nothing's impossible though, so if that's what the community wants, then that's what I'll build!
So what do you guys think? CM10 or CM9?

It's your time and effort you do what Rom you want to do. Any Rom would be great!
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using Tapatalk 2

vizzy said:
It's your time and effort you do what Rom you want to do. Any Rom would be great!
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm torn between the two! On the one hand, I want a stable ROM which would be CM9, but I also love that JellyBean goodness. I've also seen some people here that simply want a stable CM9 that's up to date, and other's that want the latest CM10 despite bugs. That's the point of this thread

I would tell u is that first for cm9 when we get a stable awesome cm9 for sure it will be easy to get a cm10... btw are u going to build a kernel?

My vote goes towards CM9! been using codename for the past couple months and although i'm enjoying all the new features, i still find myself yearning for a rock solid & stable ASOP based build.
Sent from my Incredible S using Tapatalk 2

linezero said:
I would tell u is that first for cm9 when we get a stable awesome cm9 for sure it will be easy to get a cm10... btw are u going to build a kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I could give it a try, but if nik and others couldn't get a 3.0 kernel up and running for AOSP, then I'll have a damn hard time. I'd prefer to have someone else make the new kernel, I don't know much about compiling them. Till then, I would just use X-ICS4.0 for the kernel.

Make a CM9, CM10 would have in the end too much bugs and they would just chance again. I'm waiting for a stable cm9 anyway
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda app-developers app

Kernel 3, Cm10 got my vote
sent from my jellybean device

ZaySk said:
Hey guys, I'm thinking of compiling a CM ROM from source next month (have to wait for data cap to reset) and was wondering what you guys would prefer, a significantly more stable CM9, or a more buggy (and more headaches for me) CM10 ROM? I personally would prefer to do a CM9 ROM since it would be easier to support and fix bugs on, since we already have relatively stable, working builds of AOSP ICS. CM10 would be great as well, but it would be much harder for me to support, since I would be the second dev for the Inc S to build a JB ROM from source for us. I just don't think I have the know-how to be the only one working on it, and the only one fixing bugs and whatnot, without any already working source code to view and compare.
So I could compile CM9.2 stable, and we would have the latest CM9 code using kaijura's IceColdSandwich as a reference. I would have an easier time supporting the ICS ROM since I would have working source code to compare and review. Also, it would be significantly more stable simply due to the fact that multiple devs for our device have already worked on it. I'm sure I'd be able to fix bugs and support it fairly easily, other devs are the best resource around
Or I could compile a CM10 ROM. I would have to take device proprietary files from nik's JB ROM's, which would mean my compiled ROM would share a lot of the same bugs our current JB ROM's already have. I could support and fix bugs in CM10, it would just take longer and be harder to do. Nothing's impossible though, so if that's what the community wants, then that's what I'll build!
So what do you guys think? CM10 or CM9?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cm9 bro! because ics kernel source is out and bugs can be fixed!

Yeah. CM9 would be OK for me too. I can help with testing if needed.
But what would be those great JB features we would be missing out? Sry I haven't been following the differences between 4.0 and 4.1.

IncS community is desperate for at least one fully functional, bugless AOSP ROM, so my vote goes for CM9

CM9 bro..wishing for bugless one.. gud luck..
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda app-developers app

My 2 cents.
CM9. Kernel sources for ICS has been release by HTC and ANY AOSP rom that is stable would be very welcome in our community.
(I know there is gingerbread roms.. But.. Its ginger bread..)
Jelly Bean is nice and all,
But the odds of getting a stable AOSP rom are much higher with cm9.

CM9 I would say. I hope you can fix data problems for Vodafone NL users. We always have problems with data connection on AOSP ROMs.

CM9 would be great....!!
Its great to see devs are enthusiasticaly working on Roms..!!
You are the one dude...
Jst for info u might already aware of
This thread
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1914015
CM10 test build
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda app-developers app

my vote a CM9 ASOP rom and bugless
Sent from my Incredible S using xda premium

naathaanb96 said:
cm9 bro! because ics kernel source is out and bugs can be fixed!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Totally agree. I don't like much sense ROMs, CM9 with working camera and camcorder would be perfect!
Thanks ZaySk

CM9!!!!

ZaySk said:
Hey guys, I'm thinking of compiling a CM ROM from source next month (have to wait for data cap to reset) and was wondering what you guys would prefer, a significantly more stable CM9, or a more buggy (and more headaches for me) CM10 ROM? I personally would prefer to do a CM9 ROM since it would be easier to support and fix bugs on, since we already have relatively stable, working builds of AOSP ICS. CM10 would be great as well, but it would be much harder for me to support, since I would be the second dev for the Inc S to build a JB ROM from source for us. I just don't think I have the know-how to be the only one working on it, and the only one fixing bugs and whatnot, without any already working source code to view and compare.
So I could compile CM9.2 stable, and we would have the latest CM9 code using kaijura's IceColdSandwich as a reference. I would have an easier time supporting the ICS ROM since I would have working source code to compare and review. Also, it would be significantly more stable simply due to the fact that multiple devs for our device have already worked on it. I'm sure I'd be able to fix bugs and support it fairly easily, other devs are the best resource around
Or I could compile a CM10 ROM. I would have to take device proprietary files from nik's JB ROM's, which would mean my compiled ROM would share a lot of the same bugs our current JB ROM's already have. I could support and fix bugs in CM10, it would just take longer and be harder to do. Nothing's impossible though, so if that's what the community wants, then that's what I'll build!
So what do you guys think? CM10 or CM9?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My request would be neither CM9 nor CM 10.... it will be great if you can work on Kernel Version 3.... Becz that is the only roadblock for us for Jelly Bean and would open doors for may developers to come up with fresh and exciting jelly bean ROMs.....Why stay behind the world guys... lets target Jelly bean step by step.....who knows if you start working on kernel it may really turn out to be good.....Try for kernel bro......all the best.. try to compile it from source....

A rock solid cm9 would be great!
Sent from my Incredible S using xda app-developers app

[Dev] [JB/ICS] OC Engine for 2.6.39 Kernel

I got time today a little while to observe OC possibility, and attempted. I was in hurry and these days I dont much have time these days so I've not tested what I've writtten, but theoretically it should work without issues:
OC Engine For LG Optimus 2x For 2.6.39.x Kernel
*It's written for 1.2Ghz but it's easy to ramp up to 1.4/1.5 by observing codes.
Devs feel free to use ,
and rippers dont rip codes to represent it as yours.
Download
*See attached patch file

Wow thank you so much.....will have a look at it right away......

spica1234 said:
I got time today a little while to observe OC possibility, and attempted. I was in hurry and these days I dont much have time these days so I've not tested what I've writtten, but theoretically it should work without issues:
OC Engine For LG Optimus 2x For 2.6.39.x Kernel
*It's written for 1.2Ghz but it's easy to ramp up to 1.4/1.5 by observing codes.
Devs feel free to use ,
and rippers dont rip codes to represent it as yours.
Download
*See attached patch file
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this is another OC/UV patch
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1971350 (Please see attachments)
based on the "Overclocking the Toshiba AC100" work by gordan
- http://www.altechnative.net/2011/12/31/overclocking-the-toshiba-ac100/
and the TF101 OC by ibladesi
- https://github.com/ibladesi/TF101-HighOC-3P1
it works nicely with my SU660
harsh already applied simplified version of this OC/UV patch on his kernel
https://github.com/bhanvadia/lge-kernel-star/commit/ed65546739d458454f0c4d14902d970626046e06
https://github.com/bhanvadia/lge-kernel-star/commit/31cd7ea99b962386ba12e36fc99e3ac9dc858def
it needs two fixes
- https://github.com/bhanvadia/lge-kernel-star/commit/604d675b84aaa905a675109e52b4becebded9cff
- https://github.com/bhanvadia/lge-kernel-star/commit/4ade8a95ed07aa5ac08d1923f48192f91ced8d68

Thanks wkpark for all these references. I logged in xda after many days, I wasnt aware about yours and harsh's attempt about oc. Anyways but I am happy, about your references and yours and harsh's work . Actually your 2 refrences posted last are useful that's neccessory for oc, I made a long route instead as I din't get much time to observe other files.
Thank you anyways
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda app-developers app

Welcome back buddy.....
Old is gold.....have seen the two old buddies come back when there sadness with one good one gone....
But life is like that......good and bad
O2X with Magical ROM and supersonic kernels from my buddies

whank u spica any one compile a OC kernel all ready?

Take your time, but those can't wait, all of us in fact, must try Topogigis rom
Sent from the new smoothly LGP990

Thanks Spica
Subscribed :laugh:

CarloIT said:
Thanks Spica
Subscribed :laugh:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I logged in after many days and found wkpark has already made oc available in easy more effective ways and more robustly it has been written
Users are usually don't aware about the real heroes and those such persons are wkpark, harsh etc who has given very much contributions for lg optimus 2x.
So thanks deserving persons are wkpark and harsh as well that users must know
"Share, learn and enjoy" that's the key to OpenSource
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda app-developers app

wkpark said:
this is another OC/UV patch
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1971350 (Please see attachments)
based on the "Overclocking the Toshiba AC100" work by gordan
- http://www.altechnative.net/2011/12/31/overclocking-the-toshiba-ac100/
and the TF101 OC by ibladesi
- https://github.com/ibladesi/TF101-HighOC-3P1
it works nicely with my SU660
harsh already applied simplified version of this OC/UV patch on his kernel
https://github.com/bhanvadia/lge-kernel-star/commit/ed65546739d458454f0c4d14902d970626046e06
https://github.com/bhanvadia/lge-kernel-star/commit/31cd7ea99b962386ba12e36fc99e3ac9dc858def
it needs two fixes
- https://github.com/bhanvadia/lge-kernel-star/commit/604d675b84aaa905a675109e52b4becebded9cff
- https://github.com/bhanvadia/lge-kernel-star/commit/4ade8a95ed07aa5ac08d1923f48192f91ced8d68
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can u build one version for p990!

anjo88 said:
can u build one version for p990!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
commit in my github is for P990 itself.
But as Topo said, OC is flaky currently. Anything more than 1.2 GHz make phone hang. Need to find where did NVIDIA implemented code for making CPU stuck as half frequency if its OCed.

Harsh said:
commit in my github is for P990 itself.
But as Topo said, OC is flaky currently. Anything more than 1.2 GHz make phone hang. Need to find where did NVIDIA implemented code for making CPU stuck as half frequency if its OCed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
great can u share it so that people can test! i have all msot shure that audio bug is boatloader related so if some on can compile a cm10 from RC and apply the new bootloader for testing will be great!
Anda I'm saying that because 28e/g cm10 old bootloader call problems v228/e/g new bootloader at 10 not a sigle call problem!

anjo88 said:
great can u share it so that people can test! i have all msot shure that audio bug is boatloader related so if some on can compile a cm10 from RC and apply the new bootloader for testing will be great!
Anda I'm saying that because 28e/g cm10 old bootloader call problems v228/e/g new bootloader at 10 not a sigle call problem!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
bootloadr is not related with audio bug... and that will never be.
official leaked ics roms doesn't have audio bugs just because they are official p990 roms with the official p990 kernel from lg, i remind you that cm10 is using su660 kernel source, a not completely but strongly enough different phone.

pidocchio said:
official leaked ics roms doesn't have audio bugs just because they are official p990 roms with the official p990 kernel from lg, i remind you that cm10 is using su660 kernel source, a not completely but strongly enough different phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you read a bit more, you'll find out that the original P990 ICS leak with untouched kernel is also suffering from the same bug. Nothing to do with CM10 or SU660...
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda app-developers app

pidocchio said:
bootloadr is not related with audio bug... and that will never be.
official leaked ics roms doesn't have audio bugs just because they are official p990 roms with the official p990 kernel from lg, i remind you that cm10 is using su660 kernel source, a not completely but strongly enough different phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you read a bit more, you'll find out that the original P990 ICS leak with untouched kernel is also suffering from the same bug. Nothing to do with CM10 or SU660...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think that the new bootloader and related thing have better compatibility with ics then the old gb bootloader, for sure..
I'm using the leaked ics from the beginning and i don't have a single call bug

Buccio said:
I think that the new bootloader and related thing have better compatibility with ics then the old gb bootloader, for sure..
I'm using the leaked ics from the beginning and i don't have a single call bug
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
why dont adapt cm10 with new bootloader and then we know wheter the in call audio bug is still present or not....sorry for oot

godh3ll said:
why dont adapt cm10 with new bootloader and then we know wheter the in call audio bug is still present or not....sorry for oot
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree, someone with kind heart and capable should build cm10 with new bootloader/layout partition.

aldyu said:
Agree, someone with kind heart and capable should build cm10 with new bootloader/layout partition.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+11111

godh3ll said:
why dont adapt cm10 with new bootloader and then we know wheter the in call audio bug is still present or not....sorry for oot
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know audio bug is really an annoying bug.
I don't know whether audio bug is related to boot loader or not.
And about boot loader, I won't say its impossible w/o sources but we don't have boot loader sources, neither sources of old nor new:/
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda app-developers app

don't care about OC on JB, need ramhack...CM10 have tiny free ram

SGS+ I9001 Question

Hi everyone in this forum,
Just a quick question, a friend of mine owns a SGS+ I9001 and he's running stock rom, I wanted to install a custom rom for him, (I know I'm not supposed to ask these kind of questions) which rom do you recommend me, it needs to be as stable, fast and battery friendly as possible, I hope you could help me, thank you very much before hand!
Have a nice one!

thecrab93 said:
Hi everyone in this forum,
Just a quick question, a friend of mine owns a SGS+ I9001 and he's running stock rom, I wanted to install a custom rom for him, (I know I'm not supposed to ask these kind of questions) which rom do you recommend me, it needs to be as stable, fast and battery friendly as possible, I hope you could help me, thank you very much before hand!
Have a nice one!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All CM9 based roms are stable. Also the CM10 based roms are stable but they might have some bugs.

temeritas said:
All CM9 based roms are stable. Also the CM10 based roms are stable but they might have some bugs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you very much, do you recommend me any in particular and if so, why? Thanks again.

thecrab93 said:
Thank you very much, do you recommend me any in particular and if so, why? Thanks again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using Ivendor's CM10 alpha 6 now. It works very well. But you should read in the SGS+ section what rom is the best for yourself. For myself Ivendor's CM10 is the best because I have now JB working on my phone like on a nexus device.

I agree that ivendor's Kernel are one of the most snappier ever so far.

Thank you guys, thank you very much, just another question, is ivendors CM10 stable enough for a person that knows very little about android to use as a daily driver? Thanks again!

thecrab93 said:
Thank you guys, thank you very much, just another question, is ivendors CM10 stable enough for a person that knows very little about android to use as a daily driver? Thanks again!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NO, it's not perfectly stable, because it's an ALPHA release, however most of us use it as a daily ROM. One or two random reboots in one month, some minor freezes - I think it's worth it, the performance is outstanding, especially with some 3.x.x. kernels. Anyway, wait for RC version, if you want stock rom - like stability.

You could also try one of the CM9 releases. They've been around longer and are probably more stable than the CM10 ones.
I'm using arco's release (can be found http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1650615) which has only very few quirks left. The only ones I run into sometimes are a problem with the compass (something strange is going on with the magnetic field sensor) and GMail / Facebook occasionally display only a white screen (which can be fixed by killing and restarting the app) (which can be mapped onto long-pressing the back button).
There's also ivendor's release, which has some other fixes but hasn't been updated for quite some time. There's also a number of remixes, an AOSP release by broodplank, AOKP, and MIUI.
Basicly, there's a list here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1901212
The JB's are bound to have some bugs, don't flash them if you don't plan on updating as well. ICS is probably rather stable and most GB releases are probably stable as well.
Fastest: probably AOSP (so brood's release) and JB (project butter and all)
Most battery-friendly: GB
Stable: anything but JB

temeritas said:
I'm using Ivendor's CM10 alpha 6 now. It works very well. But you should read in the SGS+ section what rom is the best for yourself. For myself Ivendor's CM10 is the best because I have now JB working on my phone like on a nexus device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mikroos said:
I agree that ivendor's Kernel are one of the most snappier ever so far.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Jacol82 said:
NO, it's not perfectly stable, because it's an ALPHA release, however most of us use it as a daily ROM. One or two random reboots in one month, some minor freezes - I think it's worth it, the performance is outstanding, especially with some 3.x.x. kernels. Anyway, wait for RC version, if you want stock rom - like stability.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Marshian said:
You could also try one of the CM9 releases. They've been around longer and are probably more stable than the CM10 ones.
I'm using arco's release (can be found http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1650615) which has only very few quirks left. The only ones I run into sometimes are a problem with the compass (something strange is going on with the magnetic field sensor) and GMail / Facebook occasionally display only a white screen (which can be fixed by killing and restarting the app) (which can be mapped onto long-pressing the back button).
There's also ivendor's release, which has some other fixes but hasn't been updated for quite some time. There's also a number of remixes, an AOSP release by broodplank, AOKP, and MIUI.
Basicly, there's a list here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1901212
The JB's are bound to have some bugs, don't flash them if you don't plan on updating as well. ICS is probably rather stable and most GB releases are probably stable as well.
Fastest: probably AOSP (so brood's release) and JB (project butter and all)
Most battery-friendly: GB
Stable: anything but JB
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok guys, thanks so much, I think I'll stick with arco's cm9 release so my friend can try it for a while and see if it's ok, thanks again

Kowalski kernel for SU660 - CM10.1 Nightly

A member from tinhte.vn (a Vietnamese smartphone website) built a version of Kowalski kernel specifically for SU660.
Pls come to this site: http://www.tinhte.vn/threads/lg-opt...p-rom-root-fix-loi-update-ics-cm10-1.1292092/ - (I think this the best site ever for SU660)
and search for: minhhang129
or you can download here http://www.mediafire.com/?qlrkn9a2yjbiu7p
BIG THANKS TO MINHHANG129 FROM VIETNAM
"Words from Minhhang129 to pengus77: thank you - you are of great help to SU660 community"
This file should be flashed after you flash standard official cm10.1 nightly (which you have to remove the P990 assert as aragorn7's guide here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1850967).
The kernel works fine - just remember to come to setting/performance/processor and change minimum cpu freq to 216
WARNING: YOUR PHONE MAY BRICK - YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED

Re: Kowalsky kernel for SU660 - for CM10.1 Nightly
su660ics said:
A member from tinhte.vn (a Vietnamese smartphone website) built a version of Kowalsky kernel specifically for SU660.
Pls come to this site: http://www.tinhte.vn/threads/lg-opt...p-rom-root-fix-loi-update-ics-cm10-1.1292092/ - (I think the this the best site ever for SU660)
and search for: minhhang129
or you can download here http://www.mediafire.com/?qlrkn9a2yjbiu7p
BIG THANKS TO MINHHANG129 FROM VIETNAM
This file should be flashed after you flash standard official cm10.1 nightly (which you have to remove the P990 assert as aragorn7's guide here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1850967).
The kernel works fine - just remember to come to setting/performance/processor and change minimum cpu freq to 216
WARNING: YOUR PHONE MAY BRICK - YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks man will try this soon.
what build of kowalsky?
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda premium

Uhm, really ? Would be nice to have had a heads up at least before building this... i'm actively developing this kernel and i don't find it really fair to just pick it up and compile it as-is.
BTW it's kowalski, not kowalsky...
Tell the guy who ported it to the SU660 to send me pull requests on github with his fixes please, so i can build SU660 versions directly from my source and keep it in sync with the P990 one

pengus77 said:
Uhm, really ? Would be nice to have had a heads up at least before building this... i'm actively developing this kernel and i don't find it really fair to just pick it up and compile it as-is.
BTW it's kowalski, not kowalsky...
Tell the guy who ported it to the SU660 to send me pull requests on github with his fixes please, so i can build SU660 versions directly from my source and keep it in sync with the P990 one
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi pengus77, sorry if you feel it inconvenient. This guy minhhang129 only compiled a version - which serves as temp because since CM team upgrade to CM10.1 , the wkpark kernel seemed not work anymore.
This guy's english is no as good, and so is mine. And I actually am a casual user who dont know about technical matters, things about github and fixes prove too much for me - thats why this version only works like a waiting version for SU660 user who really want a working kernel (though with some acceptable bugs) for old bootloader CM10.1 Nightly and only so
We are looking forward to hearing from your kernel for SU660 and thank you.
P/S: I have changed the name

su660ics said:
Hi pengus77, sorry if you feel it inconvenient. This guy minhhang129 only compiled a version - which serves as temp because since CM team upgrade to CM10.1 , the wkpark kernel seemed not work anymore.
This guy's english is no as good, and so is mine. And I actually am a casual user who dont know about technical matters, things about github and fixes prove too much for me - thats why this version only works like a waiting version for SU660 user who really want a working kernel (though with some acceptable bugs) for old bootloader CM10.1 Nightly and only so
We are looking forward to hearing from your kernel for SU660 and thank you.
P/S: I have changed the name
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First, unless someone can get that guy 'minhhang129' to work with Pengus77, we won't be enjoying this kernel's full feature (it comes with OC but not really working)
Second, why is it only for CM10.1? :/
I'm not really fond of using that ROM so I think I will just stick to using PA + wkpark's kernel
last, just want to thank Pengus77 for his concern and I blame TS for the misspelled Kowalski hahah
Sent from my LG-SU660 using xda premium

genemini said:
First, unless someone can get that guy 'minhhang129' to work with Pengus77, we won't be enjoying this kernel's full feature (it comes with OC but not really working)
Second, why is it only for CM10.1? :/
I'm not really fond of using that ROM so I think I will just stick to using PA + wkpark's kernel
last, just want to thank Pengus77 for his concern and I blame TS for the misspelled Kowalski hahah
Sent from my LG-SU660 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
, I dont really compile it out this kowalski kernel so dont blame me hehe minhhang must know this but me dont
This kernel allow OC actually, I am using max processor freq at 1200 which you can max it at 1456. It's a pity but as I said minhhang's english is not so good and I only know him online so cant work out. Can I ask you one thing: is paranoid good??? I really want to try it , hehe, but does everything work right now? eg. video decoder etc

Trying the PA 2.5. it boots forever
Can you show me how to install PA, it seems goods

yup, it's very smoooooth!
I'm currently on build4 and never had issue, video playback is fine too(I'm using MX Player), games are all working well too.
I actually tried build5 but some apps and games are not working for me so i revert back to build4
its worth a try! heheh

genemini said:
yup, it's very smoooooth!
I'm currently on build4 and never had issue, video playback is fine too(I'm using MX Player), games are all working well too.
I actually tried build5 but some apps and games are not working for me so i revert back to build4
its worth a try! heheh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've just tried it and see a lot of potential in there, especially the nav - bar. Very cool. But version 2.3 is without project butter I think. I am using CM10.1 for long and when use 2.3 version I still see version 2.3 not as smooth as cm10.1 nightly. Maybe just my feeling. I just back off to CM10.1
If pengus77 can build a version of his famous kernel for SU660 which can run PA 2.6 - I think I will stick with this Paranoid Android - It's very cool
Tks anyway and pray for a new kernel for PA 2.6

you can use wkpark's fix and kernel for PA 2.6 too.
just download PA ROM 2.6 (whichever build u like) then rename it to 'cm-10-20130106-NIGHTLY-p990'

someone can make a kernel for the new bootloader??

genemini said:
you can use wkpark's fix and kernel for PA 2.6 too.
just download PA ROM 2.6 (whichever build u like) then rename it to 'cm-10-20130106-NIGHTLY-p990'
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks it works great. No call bug till now, no bsod - great rom

Kowalsky kernel for SU660 with new bootloader any one have..??

deleted