Database Develop

[kernel][27/01/2012][ICS kernel based Paolo Kernel 2.6.35.14]

Hi Guys,
First of all I am not a real DEV. I see things, read things and learn from it. That's all.
I have patched Palao's kernel for my use on ICS ROM. Some guys can use it so thought to share with you.
I have not created this Kernel from scratch so haven't changed it's name. Giving full respect to it's DEV.
Change LOG:
Binod_Kernel_Paol_Sys_V1.zip
HTML:
Fixed WI-FI
Fixed Random Reboot
Few scripts for ROM stability
Downlaod: http://www.mediafire.com/?5p4790z44l36qg2
Report if you guys find some bugs. I'll try to resolve it.

Reserved
I think I can utilise it..

its for Cyanogenmod 9 (Android 4.0.3)[ALPHA3] by lupohirp?

sweetbinodray,
can you tell exactly what you used

hafidzduddin said:
its for Cyanogenmod 9 (Android 4.0.3)[ALPHA3] by lupohirp?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes....it's for LUPOHIRP ROM

Next job:
Import kgsl drivers and power manager from 3.0 kernel...
Quite good... keep it up...

What about cm7 nightlies?
Sent from my LG-P500 using Tapatalk

dnle71 said:
What about cm7 nightlies?
Sent from my LG-P500 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try flashing this... since not much has been changed...

_Arjen_ said:
sweetbinodray,
can you tell exactly what you used
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nothing much. Just changed the whole kernel folder. Only sys is from PAO.

What kernel source you use to build?
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA App

thachtunganh said:
What kernel source you use to build?
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
official CM7 kernel

Why use this instead of Franco's 2.35.14? Pros & cons?
Sent from my LG-P500 using Much Love

you rocks dude
but I think, franco kernel is better CMIIW

can you patch the battery improvement patches from fserve?

Whats the ICS thing about this kernel? Right.
Same question at that file explorer "ICS".
Right.
Stability fixes?
Right.
Franco is always better.
Greets!

You cant actually call this ICS Kernel...
The one which lupohirp will release with his next ICS Beta will be considered as an ICS Kernel due to backporting of many drivers to make ICS more stable...

RockR172 said:
You cant actually call this ICS Kernel...
The one which lupohirp will release with his next ICS Beta will be considered as an ICS Kernel due to backporting of many drivers to make ICS more stable...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats what I said. Bino can't port them, so this is just a BinoKernel
Wait, I'll make a script wich reboots the phone and call it "The ICS script by mDroidd"!
Vir Prudens non contra ventum mingit

RockR172 said:
You cant actually call this ICS Kernel...
The one which lupohirp will release with his next ICS Beta will be considered as an ICS Kernel due to backporting of many drivers to make ICS more stable...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The backport of Kgsl driver will be hard. I don't think that we just clone the free xperia kernel source then get the patch and patch our kernel source... we still need to modify, beside , the power manager is broken...

Guys you are going high. I haven't said that this is my kernel. I even haven't changed it's name. So just stop pissing someone. I patched it for my use. It's working great for me.For the ICS name, It's for ICS ROM that's why ICS kernel.
If you want go ahead and download if not then don't. keep everything very simple.

mDroidd said:
Wait, I'll make a script wich reboots the phone and call it "The ICS script by mDroidd"!
Vir Prudens non contra ventum mingit
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Stop overacting kid! You seem to be getting dax's habits..stop spamming!
Sent from my LG-P500 using Tapatalk

Just Inform

As we knows guys,our device not getting firmware update from official,and we cant get stable firm/OS/ROM till now
Just inform to you all,,
All we need is new KERNEL for step up on developments,not new ROM or anything else
Even we get new lib,new bin for ROM,we will alwats get stuck without new KERNEL
Sorry I just say,cant doing anything
But I suggest to all,think about port/backport KERNEL,not port ROM
For me,its very useless if we always think for new ROM without new KERNEL
so,this topic minds is
ALL WE NEED FOR MOVE OUT AND STEP UP IS "NEW KERNEL" VERSION
Thanks,
Please read the title,I dont have mind to offense anyone
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2

How, will, when, what will this update come from?
Sent from my A99 using xda app-developers app

I've tried so many times to port our kernel to higher version but always failed.. now I'm little bit busy with my job and preparing to get a college to continue my study.. for now,, i just developing android if i really have a free time.. and i will share if i succeed to port our kernel..
thanks for all support..

No spill overs from PA or AOPK?
Sent from my A99 using xda app-developers app

Tj_style was told me about kernel,,its very hard to port/backport kernel,so surely make new kernel is excellently hard
He said, our device is far from standard google architecture
Last time ago,,he planning to release Andro-id v3.3 RC4 with new baseband and kernel 2.6.35.14, unfortunately,his device getting brick and his development didn't complete yet,,new kernel still give issue on WiFi and GPS
Maybe we really need talk and ask help for hard kernel modder for this
As aben said,he also busy at this time and will help when he have free time
We can't step up if still on this
We need help from kernel modder/kernel devs
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2

We have to reconsider the bounty initiated by our good friend naynesh.
Happy Holidays everyone.
^_^

aeoi said:
We have to reconsider the bounty initiated by our good friend naynesh.
Happy Holidays everyone.
^_^
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats it
Sorry for donating,,I cant donate as you know Indonesian people minority does have Credit Card
So we must try ask for real dev for developing our device
Where is naynesh??I never meet him in this forum since he announce bounty will refund
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2

why not to just optimize current kernel with stable gingerbread rom?
want ics/jb features?
one of my friend's highly customized cm7 rom has it, not all, but most cool features. and ton of customization available. why not try it?
port it or build it from source.

ardX said:
why not to just optimize current kernel with stable gingerbread rom?
want ics/jb features?
one of my friend's highly customized cm7 rom has it, not all, but most cool features. and ton of customization available. why not try it?
port it or build it from source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whats kind ROM?
What about CyanMobile X?
Om,simple things is,,our 2.6.35.7 is far from stable,,CM7 with .35 doesnt have fully working default camera,,simple thing,but very important,and what about the others?WiFi SoD?ICV OCV?
Thats what I mean and force me downgrade my Mia to .32
About backport kernel fro 3.x.x or make new kernel,,how about your opinion om ardx?
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2

Arya_3RDNumber said:
Whats kind ROM?
What about CyanMobile X?
Om,simple things is,,our 2.6.35.7 is far from stable,,CM7 with .35 doesnt have fully working default camera,,simple thing,but very important,and what about the others?WiFi SoD?ICV OCV?
Thats what I mean and force me downgrade my Mia to .32
About backport kernel fro 3.x.x or make new kernel,,how about your opinion om ardx?
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
whatever, just try to develop it yourself, truth is, that fix was available in various commit on various github that develop this device or other
about backport, check other Recognized Developer that try it at other device, are they suceeded, yet? so...

Arya_3RDNumber said:
Tj_style was told me about kernel,,its very hard to port/backport kernel,so surely make new kernel is excellently hard
He said, our device is far from standard google architecture
Last time ago,,he planning to release Andro-id v3.3 RC4 with new baseband and kernel 2.6.35.14, unfortunately,his device getting brick and his development didn't complete yet,,new kernel still give issue on WiFi and GPS
Maybe we really need talk and ask help for hard kernel modder for this
As aben said,he also busy at this time and will help when he have free time
We can't step up if still on this
We need help from kernel modder/kernel devs
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If some one can request Tj style to provide his kernel source to aben or CK and they can try to work out issues.
Bcoz 2.6.35.14 will help us to have many more roms for our device.
I tried few roms to port but failed due to kernel
Aben
Can you take lead on this to provide us stable 2.6.35.14 kernel . we can also try same kernel with wifi and GPS issue.Tj style has shared his source on github
you need to just build it
Requesting you to please help and build 1 version of 35.14 kernel for all of us
Arya
Can you request TJ STYLE to provide his kernel
EDIT : I am trying to port Cyanmobile from sometime but failed to boot it up also tried AURORA ICS on .35 kernel booting but getting into bootloop don't know what to do

If I not wrong,,Cyanmobile X is GB 2.3.8
Dont know what is mean with "2.3.8" as we know higher version GB is 2.3.7
Maybe,thats which make it cant boot
I was request TJ from some days ago,but he dont reply my PM till now,,I dont know why,,maybe you can also PM him
35.14 can take backport kernel 3.x.x architecture
I also saw kernel 2.6.66.7 on galaxy ace 4.2.1 alpha
Seriously,we totally need new kernel for continue ROM projects
My suggest,,try to build Cyanmobile X friends
I think,you need build new source for Cyanmobile,it cant boot if just porting
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2

You got the point ArdX... I was tried with 3.0.xx months ago, but damn it's tooo many to change, it will took much time which I didn't have, so I dropped the project. I was thinking to modified .32 to make it faster, but l still like .35. May be later.
By the way, Vigo has .35 kernel officially. Any one has the source?
Sent from my bike using Tapatalk 2

CacingKalung said:
You got the point ArdX... I was tried with 3.0.xx months ago, but damn it's tooo many to change, it will took much time which I didn't have, so I dropped the project. I was thinking to modified .32 to make it faster, but l still like .35. May be later.
By the way, Vigo has .35 kernel officially. Any one has the source?
Sent from my bike using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup that's right.. I've did that too.. so many changes on kernel 3.x.x.. even sometimes my computer getting Hank if I want to see the different between our kernel and 3.x.x,,
I still try it sometimes in my free time..
Btw nice to see you again on CK.. :thumbup:

Arya_3RDNumber said:
Thats it
Sorry for donating,,I cant donate as you know Indonesian people minority does have Credit Card
So we must try ask for real dev for developing our device
Where is naynesh??I never meet him in this forum since he announce bounty will refund
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Friends I am here only, but remaining silent. Unfortunately while i was touring Delhi my dear MI 410 got broken and now i am stuck with galaxy ace s5830.
I think it is too late now. If we were able to raise the sum in time then randomblame would surely have helped us, he is a very good developer. Besides him i had asked to dzo, doomlord, lord clockan they also said that they are busy.
If you are still interested in the bounty idea, then i suggest you contact some developer (May be edowar) and ask him for help. As i have already informed that randomblame had turned down the proposal and tj_style did not reply, it is upto someone from you who has to take a lead. I can transfer the entire bounty amount to any senior member. Please advice before i start refunding by the next month for sure.
PS Thanks to everyone of this board particularly the devs/porters/modders/testers. I owe you more than what i can put in words.

abenagiel said:
Yup that's right.. I've did that too.. so many changes on kernel 3.x.x.. even sometimes my computer getting Hank if I want to see the different between our kernel and 3.x.x,,
I still try it sometimes in my free time..
Btw nice to see you again on CK.. :thumbup:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi Aben. I don't know, may be next week am going to dissapear again due to entering busy mode again.
Sent from my bike using Tapatalk 2

hi CK n aben. yeah, you have no life if doing that. lol
btw, can you two put your kernel source to the github? and device config maybe, GB based will be better. just want to try build cyanmobile. but cant test myself, so stable config+kernel can help me to fixing bug without device. hehe

@nayneshdev so,,are planning to repair your Mi-410?
Honestly,I dont have any idea for that,,since all devs get busy like CK,ardx,aben,and TJ
Also our friends like elol,zuk,and many,sory if I forget them dissapear from this forum
What about anyone guys?about this bounty
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2

Arya_3RDNumber said:
@nayneshdev so,,are planning to repair your Mi-410?
Honestly,I dont have any idea for that,,since all devs get busy like CK,ardx,aben,and TJ
Also our friends like elol,zuk,and many,sory if I forget them dissapear from this forum
What about anyone guys?about this bounty
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is a damage beyond repair, screen crushed, board broken into pieces even the sim crushed, a construction truck ran over it, i don't know how it got damaged that bad, previously it was touch enough to withstand many falls, must have been a very bad position.
Personally i think devs should concentrate on fixing the issues with the present kernel and tj_style for sure can fix the camera issue. So it would be better if someone asks to tj_style whether he is willing to do development if we provide him a device.

Hi ardx /aben/ CK
Tj style has shared his kernel 2.6.35.14 source on GIT Hub.
Can you guys built it for our device
Thanks in advance

Lets talk about CM10 and ICS - with POLL

Hi peeps!
So... moving away and not spam the other dev and general threads, I just wanted to open a new one where we can discuss about the differences between CM10 on old bootloader (cause the other roms are soooo 2011 ) and the new STOCK ICS great tuned roms on NEW BOOTLOADER
I was using DM v30b ICS for a long time and I was pretty satisfied! But after I saw the call bug fix on the official CM10, I didn't even think about it and replaced it
Not that the DMs version isnt fine, but I was remembering that the CM10 version on old bootloader was pretty awesome!
Im using the CM10 official and the only thing I would say against it is the battery life Everything else is awesome!
P.S. This thread is not for DEVs, cause I dont want to offend anyone with posts like "This ROM is much better than this".
Every dev here is FUK*n AWESOME and the jobs they do are amazing... Be honest... before our devs started to tune the phones, we would all be on some freakin apple ****s! (sorry for my language!).
Keep up that good job and ignore our post and threads, its just sharing opinions between consumers
PUT yOUR OPINIONS IN HERE RIGHT NOW !

That's right, Official CM10 is Awesome since LG release their source code. But I will be honest, I tried the first Stock ICS v30a and I was not happy with it because of the speed...even if we have 2 cores. Then I return to cm10...but since we have official source code, the devs start making custom kernel which are really AWESOME, seriously. So, I'm now on cm10 (old bt) with Pidocchio kernel (old bt) for about 5-6 weeks...and it rocks. :good:
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda premium

django manouche x1.2 is good, it has ios 7 onboard

CM10 for new bootloader by pengus77
Flashed it yeastarday and the battery life is amazing.

I think cm 10 is pretty awesome, the only thing holding it back for me using it is the battery drain
And LG's official ICS was ***t if u need something thats stable ( i know it doesn't really belong here ) i think u need to back to GB like temasek's builds, but that's my meaning

pengus77 is doing a very nice job. and like marsgod took his fix to gerrit to be reviewed by cm team and they included into official repository, i think pengus77 job should too. in that way, no need to continue with the new bootloader cause is a waste of space and a mess for everybody to move there with nvflash. id we can continue using our gb bootloader and partition layout, that one we used during about 1 year, why not continue if it is working alright? my vote for cm10 official with those all changes commited into cm repository.

I'm using original locked and unrooted 30B in Italy even it is made for ESA region.
I think that this rom is near to be a definitive stable rom: very smooth and fast, no problems except for a battery drain still high (20 hours autonomy with 40% wifi); the camera could be better, too.
I'm very happy of it and I'm waiting for the same LG release for EU.
I never used overclocking or custom kernels even if I tested most of the custom roms available here on XDA. I must say that I never found a real advantage nor stability testing these roms, maybe now the time for them is near to be over.
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda app-developers app

CM10 for new bootloader by pengus77 for me
No bug, just perfect!

thanks for the opinions! I hope that the new ones here are gonna appreciate it!
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda app-developers app

I am still on Temasek's CM7 as I needed long battery and rock solid/stable operation... Waiting for our CM10 team to fix the battery drain (old boot loader) and I'll take the dive

I have a question about the call bug: when does it usually show up?
I have never experienced it, but at the same time none of my calls are ever longer than 5 minutes.
I'm still on a really early version of CM10, and I've never run into the call bug.
Only problem really is the WiFi drain. Has that been fixed? I haven't been keeping up with the latest nightlies.

deewhy said:
I have a question about the call bug: when does it usually show up?
I have never experienced it, but at the same time none of my calls are ever longer than 5 minutes.
I'm still on a really early version of CM10, and I've never run into the call bug.
Only problem really is the WiFi drain. Has that been fixed? I haven't been keeping up with the latest nightlies.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The call bug was said to be caused by a race condition - meaning it creeps up unexpectedly depending on the activity done with the phone in that timeframe.
As for wifi drain, flash the kernel tonyp compiled (containing pengus77's fix), onto any CM10 nightly that came out after the V30a sources dropped (basically December onwards).
You really should get a nightly from December onwards - a lot of things, not just the call bug, were fixed or improved along the way. I'm on 01/03 and having an improved experience over the SU660-based sources.

CM10 by arcee is very stable for me with self-compiled kernel of 24mb ramhack and patches from wkpark(including the lg twin boot logo fix). Very smooth and no BSODs and call bug. Just waiting for cm10.1 to be released by arcee.

aldyu said:
CM10 by arcee is very stable for me with self-compiled kernel of 24mb ramhack and patches from wkpark(including the lg twin boot logo fix). Very smooth and no BSODs and call bug. Just waiting for cm10.1 to be released by arcee.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sound pretty good to me, why dont you share the kernel with US consumers

any news about rhe arm kernel from nicholas?
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda app-developers app

machoman1337 said:
The call bug was said to be caused by a race condition - meaning it creeps up unexpectedly depending on the activity done with the phone in that timeframe.
As for wifi drain, flash the kernel tonyp compiled (containing pengus77's fix), onto any CM10 nightly that came out after the V30a sources dropped (basically December onwards).
You really should get a nightly from December onwards - a lot of things, not just the call bug, were fixed or improved along the way. I'm on 01/03 and having an improved experience over the SU660-based sources.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just to clarify, I flash the ROM first and then flash the kernel afterwards? Do I need to re-flash the kernel every time I flash a new nightly?

deewhy said:
Just to clarify, I flash the ROM first and then flash the kernel afterwards? Do I need to re-flash the kernel every time I flash a new nightly?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes and yes (since a new nightly will overwrite whatever kernel you have).

machoman1337 said:
Yes and yes (since a new nightly will overwrite whatever kernel you have).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks!
And just one last question:
So the callbug is fixed on the newest nightlies, but the WiFi fix has not been submitted/merged yet? So if I want the WiFi fix I still have to flash the kernel tonyp compiled, which I'm assuming is this: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=36032539&postcount=661 ?

just like that bro
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda app-developers app

just try CM10 by pengus77,it's freaking awesome.Nice power saving and no call bug.

Kowalski kernel for SU660 - CM10.1 Nightly

A member from tinhte.vn (a Vietnamese smartphone website) built a version of Kowalski kernel specifically for SU660.
Pls come to this site: http://www.tinhte.vn/threads/lg-opt...p-rom-root-fix-loi-update-ics-cm10-1.1292092/ - (I think this the best site ever for SU660)
and search for: minhhang129
or you can download here http://www.mediafire.com/?qlrkn9a2yjbiu7p
BIG THANKS TO MINHHANG129 FROM VIETNAM
"Words from Minhhang129 to pengus77: thank you - you are of great help to SU660 community"
This file should be flashed after you flash standard official cm10.1 nightly (which you have to remove the P990 assert as aragorn7's guide here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1850967).
The kernel works fine - just remember to come to setting/performance/processor and change minimum cpu freq to 216
WARNING: YOUR PHONE MAY BRICK - YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED

Re: Kowalsky kernel for SU660 - for CM10.1 Nightly
su660ics said:
A member from tinhte.vn (a Vietnamese smartphone website) built a version of Kowalsky kernel specifically for SU660.
Pls come to this site: http://www.tinhte.vn/threads/lg-opt...p-rom-root-fix-loi-update-ics-cm10-1.1292092/ - (I think the this the best site ever for SU660)
and search for: minhhang129
or you can download here http://www.mediafire.com/?qlrkn9a2yjbiu7p
BIG THANKS TO MINHHANG129 FROM VIETNAM
This file should be flashed after you flash standard official cm10.1 nightly (which you have to remove the P990 assert as aragorn7's guide here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1850967).
The kernel works fine - just remember to come to setting/performance/processor and change minimum cpu freq to 216
WARNING: YOUR PHONE MAY BRICK - YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks man will try this soon.
what build of kowalsky?
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda premium

Uhm, really ? Would be nice to have had a heads up at least before building this... i'm actively developing this kernel and i don't find it really fair to just pick it up and compile it as-is.
BTW it's kowalski, not kowalsky...
Tell the guy who ported it to the SU660 to send me pull requests on github with his fixes please, so i can build SU660 versions directly from my source and keep it in sync with the P990 one

pengus77 said:
Uhm, really ? Would be nice to have had a heads up at least before building this... i'm actively developing this kernel and i don't find it really fair to just pick it up and compile it as-is.
BTW it's kowalski, not kowalsky...
Tell the guy who ported it to the SU660 to send me pull requests on github with his fixes please, so i can build SU660 versions directly from my source and keep it in sync with the P990 one
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi pengus77, sorry if you feel it inconvenient. This guy minhhang129 only compiled a version - which serves as temp because since CM team upgrade to CM10.1 , the wkpark kernel seemed not work anymore.
This guy's english is no as good, and so is mine. And I actually am a casual user who dont know about technical matters, things about github and fixes prove too much for me - thats why this version only works like a waiting version for SU660 user who really want a working kernel (though with some acceptable bugs) for old bootloader CM10.1 Nightly and only so
We are looking forward to hearing from your kernel for SU660 and thank you.
P/S: I have changed the name

su660ics said:
Hi pengus77, sorry if you feel it inconvenient. This guy minhhang129 only compiled a version - which serves as temp because since CM team upgrade to CM10.1 , the wkpark kernel seemed not work anymore.
This guy's english is no as good, and so is mine. And I actually am a casual user who dont know about technical matters, things about github and fixes prove too much for me - thats why this version only works like a waiting version for SU660 user who really want a working kernel (though with some acceptable bugs) for old bootloader CM10.1 Nightly and only so
We are looking forward to hearing from your kernel for SU660 and thank you.
P/S: I have changed the name
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First, unless someone can get that guy 'minhhang129' to work with Pengus77, we won't be enjoying this kernel's full feature (it comes with OC but not really working)
Second, why is it only for CM10.1? :/
I'm not really fond of using that ROM so I think I will just stick to using PA + wkpark's kernel
last, just want to thank Pengus77 for his concern and I blame TS for the misspelled Kowalski hahah
Sent from my LG-SU660 using xda premium

genemini said:
First, unless someone can get that guy 'minhhang129' to work with Pengus77, we won't be enjoying this kernel's full feature (it comes with OC but not really working)
Second, why is it only for CM10.1? :/
I'm not really fond of using that ROM so I think I will just stick to using PA + wkpark's kernel
last, just want to thank Pengus77 for his concern and I blame TS for the misspelled Kowalski hahah
Sent from my LG-SU660 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
, I dont really compile it out this kowalski kernel so dont blame me hehe minhhang must know this but me dont
This kernel allow OC actually, I am using max processor freq at 1200 which you can max it at 1456. It's a pity but as I said minhhang's english is not so good and I only know him online so cant work out. Can I ask you one thing: is paranoid good??? I really want to try it , hehe, but does everything work right now? eg. video decoder etc

Trying the PA 2.5. it boots forever
Can you show me how to install PA, it seems goods

yup, it's very smoooooth!
I'm currently on build4 and never had issue, video playback is fine too(I'm using MX Player), games are all working well too.
I actually tried build5 but some apps and games are not working for me so i revert back to build4
its worth a try! heheh

genemini said:
yup, it's very smoooooth!
I'm currently on build4 and never had issue, video playback is fine too(I'm using MX Player), games are all working well too.
I actually tried build5 but some apps and games are not working for me so i revert back to build4
its worth a try! heheh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've just tried it and see a lot of potential in there, especially the nav - bar. Very cool. But version 2.3 is without project butter I think. I am using CM10.1 for long and when use 2.3 version I still see version 2.3 not as smooth as cm10.1 nightly. Maybe just my feeling. I just back off to CM10.1
If pengus77 can build a version of his famous kernel for SU660 which can run PA 2.6 - I think I will stick with this Paranoid Android - It's very cool
Tks anyway and pray for a new kernel for PA 2.6

you can use wkpark's fix and kernel for PA 2.6 too.
just download PA ROM 2.6 (whichever build u like) then rename it to 'cm-10-20130106-NIGHTLY-p990'

someone can make a kernel for the new bootloader??

genemini said:
you can use wkpark's fix and kernel for PA 2.6 too.
just download PA ROM 2.6 (whichever build u like) then rename it to 'cm-10-20130106-NIGHTLY-p990'
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks it works great. No call bug till now, no bsod - great rom

Kowalsky kernel for SU660 with new bootloader any one have..??

deleted

v30c Kernel Compiled with Linaro

Hi Guys,
I have managed to compile our ICS kernel with Linaro 4.7 and make it bootable after too much trouble.....
The kernel is compiled with o3 optimization
Toolchain used from made by Christopher83
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2098133
The kernel is tested with Nooby's v30b repack....
The kernel is build from original source i.e it has the first LED not working issue during Boot....
I would like to hear if there's any improvements or its just the same....
It was learning experience for me build a kernel .....
I do not guarantee of providing timely improvements or etc
I do not have a github etc...
can someone help me with that....i want to start it from zero ....with original source and will put patches on it...
I am attaching the patch as a zip file,..is a normal zip file with all the code necessary to compile the kernel with linaro,,,
it also has code of rmcc patch

O3 and linaro equals hard to debug bugs and no performance improvements.

Can you make one kernel for ligux rom?
Enviado desde mi Optimus Black

dflt said:
O3 and linaro equals hard to debug bugs and no performance improvements.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The O3 flag would not give much improvement over the O2 flag as the optimizations that are brought in are only applicable in a few places and the kernel isn't that computation heavy. I still want to see a O2 and Os comparison, but I don't have time to waste on things like that these days.
As for different tool chains. I have seen a benchmark sometime ago with different kernels compiled with different toolchains. The difference was marginal and seemed to differ with kernels as well as toolchains (Some toolchains just like and dislike some kernels) . Overall Code Sourcery's toolchain did best on average I think.

Post a source, otherwise this thread will be closed. You can use my guide to learn how to do that.

eagleeyetom said:
Post a source, otherwise this thread will be closed. You can use my guide to learn how to do that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was actually waiting for user replies ..but it seems no one is using my kernel...
Also i am actually busy for some time....will be providing the source either in a zip or setup a git by following your guide

AW: v30c Kernel Compiled with Linaro
eagleeyetom said:
Post a source, otherwise this thread will be closed. You can use my guide to learn how to do that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just give him some time it's always hard, when you are new to a subject... and hey, if you provide some benchmarks and further improvements, why should noone wanna use it?
Sent from my LG-P970 using xda app-developers app

Hi guys i have provided the patch to compile kernel with linaro in my OP....
regarding performance i didn't observe anything...
2days ago i officially updated my phone from 2.2 to 4.0 v30c because i wanted all my apps preserved.....
and today i experience sdcard unmount....i didnt experience it with my kernel and nooby v30b repack...maybe because i had i freshly installed...not sure....
i have not yet tried my kernel with v30c....because i have yet to patch the bootlaoader and install cwm...as per another threads to do this,,,maybe i will plan to
do this this weekend,,,,

Oh ...i got my phone reset when did reboot in recovery without any recovery with anreboot...and lost all my phone data....all efforts gone to wain...now i have to root and install apps again
Also my ICS version show 30C-SEA and i am from India...

I flashed official v30c and experienc ed sd card unmount. ..then installed v30b unlocked loader ...then installed my kernel and have been testing it....no sd unmount and also frontkey leds works according to settings done.....
Those who still have unmount problem can try my kernel in OP if you are using v20 bootloader. ..and those who use unlocked v30 unlocked bootloader dont use the Kernel attached in OP otherwise bootloop..just reply to me and I will attach the new one....
Sent from my LG-P970 using xda app-developers app

Have some view in attached file but no feedback
Thanks for your work, but I think everybody here need a optimize kernel, because, you know, the stock kernel isn't enough good

no14me said:
Have some view in attached file but no feedback
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What u want to say???
no14me said:
Thanks for your work, but I think everybody here need a optimize kernel, because, you know, the stock kernel isn't enough good
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think there's any kernel fully optimized yet..
I asked only for those who get sd unmount to try my kernel. ..no one is forced to use it....
Sent from my LG-P970 using xda app-developers app

rajeshmk2012 said:
What u want to say???
I don't think there's any kernel fully optimized yet..
I asked only for those who get sd unmount to try my kernel. ..no one is forced to use it....
Sent from my LG-P970 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just give a try with French v30C's kernel. They fixed ondemand gov. and there isn't any sd unmounting. I'm using it since it went out and hadn't any problems.
Enviado desde mi LG-P970 usando Tapatalk 2

rajeshmk2012 said:
What u want to say???
I don't think there's any kernel fully optimized yet..
I asked only for those who get sd unmount to try my kernel. ..no one is forced to use it....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see a attached file have some download, but no one give the feedback that with your kernel is the sd fixed or not. Because I don't have that issue.
About the optimization, just is my suggestion
diazao said:
Just give a try with French v30C's kernel. They fixed ondemand gov. and there isn't any sd unmounting. I'm using it since it went out and hadn't any problems.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1.

I just got sd unmount with my kernel after a week's use....
I will wait for v30d sources
Sent from my LG-P970 using xda app-developers app

Hi,
wer can i find the Adagio Kernel? the link in the first post seem to doesn't work
thanks

I dont want to interrupt your hard work but look here, may find something interesting (google translator needed) :-
http://lg-p970-shuajibao.shuajizhijia.net/
There are monthly updated ROMs and Kernels, you might be interested in.
Due to very little internet package I cant test them. If you find any ROM/Kernel useful please inform us all.