Related
So, looks like someone got hold of the kernel for the Adam from NI, post from NIH's blog:
I like it when members are kind and willing to share…
Zero,
I’m a registered member of the Notion Ink Hacks community and a developer myself. I sometimes hang out in the IRC and watch Roebeet, Rothnic, Rayman, DJ_Steve, Dougie and yourself work on various projects and find myself astounded by the talent. One of the things that I would like to do as a token of my appreciation is leak the Kernel source and some additional goodies to you and the entire Notion Ink Community. You all have waited far too long for this.
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=R31YCFZ0
Enjoy!
Armin
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Source link
Cool story broatmeal (get it? bro-oatmeal? eh? eh? loooool!)
Big kernel sources
SamWhite said:
So, looks like someone got hold of the kernel for the Adam from NI, post from NIH's blog:
Source link
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That zip is 512 megs... kinda big for kernel sources... maybe they forgot to "make clean" before zipping? Or is there other source in there besides the kernel?
Also, shame this has to "leak"... hopefully there will be a proper Notion Ink source drop (in compliance with the GPL) when the code is more mature?
aorth said:
That zip is 512 megs... kinda big for kernel sources... maybe they forgot to "make clean" before zipping? Or is there other source in there besides the kernel?
Also, shame this has to "leak"... hopefully there will be a proper Notion Ink source drop (in compliance with the GPL) when the code is more mature?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's a GIT repository, so that why it's so big.
This kernel source take only 80 megs.
aorth said:
Also, shame this has to "leak"... hopefully there will be a proper Notion Ink source drop (in compliance with the GPL) when the code is more mature?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, NI aren't actually complying with the GPL by not releasing it at the moment so it's a shame this hasn't come through official channels.
Overheard on the twitter:
Tweet from dalingrin:
2.6.32 B&N source dropped today. I expect good things to come for the #nookcolor
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sweet!!!
colorado_al said:
Overheard on the twitter:
Sweet!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If its true, WOOOO!! I have been sending official requests to them, using the GPL licence for the basis of my request (pointing out that not publishing the source code for the already shipping compiled code, was a GPL violation, and violation of the Legal contract on their page...).. i would love to think all of our prodding would make it happen faster...
I checked, and the code listed here IS the new source code. I dont know if i helped, but i am glad it did not take the weeks predicted...
http://images.barnesandnoble.com/PResources/download/Nook/source-code/nookcolor-source-code.zip
Time for phire to fix the CM7 sleep bug baby!
akarol said:
Time for dalingrin to fix the CM7 sleep bug baby!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Looking forward to this.
dalingrin apparantly has finished finals and is on the case!
WOO! Awesome!
akarol said:
Time for phire to fix the CM7 sleep bug baby!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If by "fix" you mean use the fix after it's added to CM7, then yeah.
which kind of improvements and/or new functionalities could we expect from this source? I saw on development thread that dalingrin starded working on this, but at the moment the ROM is really unusable... how will this merged into CM7?
Thanks to all s here at xda!
Seeing as how the previous thread for cm was closed due to peoples *****ing. Thought i would start another that might actually be helpful.
First, I am not a good dev. And currently on the road so unable to assist until august. I want to thank faux123 as he seem to be our best bet so far.
Links:
This will be the new github organization to bring up CM7 for atrix. thanks to faux123
https://github.com/Atrix-Dev-Team
faux123's github:
https://github.com/faux123
https://github.com/faux123/android_device_motorola_olympus
cyanogenmod olympus branch:
https://github.com/CyanogenMod/android_device_motorola_olympus
DevZombi (samcripp) olympus product script:
https://github.com/DevZombi/olympus_product_script
my github: (i am watching all relevant repos)
https://github.com/drewis
Only developer questions please. A good rule of thumb. If you do not have a github or do not know how to use git do not post in this section. Thanks. And Good Luck. Thanks for the hard work so far everyone!
OK everyone, the other thread was closed completely counter productive. We do not like having to do that. Please keep this thread clean meaning no post that are not constructive. Aka "this is awesome" or "so much potential! ". Post will be deleted to keep it clean or thread closed if it goes path of the last one. So please keep it clean.
Jug6ernaut
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk
jug6ernaut said:
OK everyone, the other thread was closed completely counter productive. We do not like having to do that. Please keep this thread clean meaning no post that are not constructive. Aka "this is awesome" or "so much potential! ". Post will be deleted to keep it clean or thread closed if it goes path of the last one. So please keep it clean.
Jug6ernaut
Sent from my Xoom using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree, nice to know that a thread can get hundreds of views without being ruined in the first few posts. Thanks for being on top of this thread Jug.
Second link (Product script) is not the web page I'm looking for (404).
AWD_Maniac said:
Second link (Product script) is not the web page I'm looking for (404).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the 2nd link is deprecated, i have started making changes to them. I will have a vendor repo for motorola on my github shortly.
Sent from my Transformer TF101 using Tapatalk
Samuel and everyone that helped thanks so much for the work on the build files, I have been struggling through it off and on when i had time... looks like extract-files.sh needs some work still but GREAT WORK AND THANK YOU
yeah my extract file requieres tons of love. today im going to begin a large effort to get it done correct. base on the latest.
i have to goals
compile aosp
compile cm7
so hopefully we can gather all this wefforts into one and speed it up. anyone that wants to pull/commit to my github feel free to do so. let me know by twitter so i can get the request quick and everyone can be up to date.
samcripp said:
yeah my extract file requieres tons of love. today im going to begin a large effort to get it done correct. base on the latest.
i have to goals
compile aosp
compile cm7
so hopefully we can gather all this wefforts into one and speed it up. anyone that wants to pull/commit to my github feel free to do so. let me know by twitter so i can get the request quick and everyone can be up to date.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We should start a github organization for this, so people can participate and add stuff without doing pull request all the time... massive pull requests get old fast
EDIT: DOH! Didn't know github organization cost $25 a month... thought it was free My bad...
faux123 said:
We should start a github organization for this, so people can participate and add stuff without doing pull request all the time... massive pull requests get old fast
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
agreed. ill read about it later and we can organize it and get it together.
samcripp said:
yeah my extract file requieres tons of love. today im going to begin a large effort to get it done correct. base on the latest.
i have to goals
compile aosp
compile cm7
so hopefully we can gather all this wefforts into one and speed it up. anyone that wants to pull/commit to my github feel free to do so. let me know by twitter so i can get the request quick and everyone can be up to date.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well i will help where i can, currently i do not have a ton of time for atrix but, I probably can work a little each day, I ran the extract-files.sh and through up the build files and gave it a make just to get an idea of where its at... we should compile a list of things that need to be done so we can work and check things off as we go , like I said though thanks everyone for the start ... your much further than I was *I am more on the AOSP route but hay it all works the same
Please update OP with this link:
https://github.com/Atrix-Dev-Team
This will be the new github organization to bring up CM7 for atrix.
faux123 said:
Please update OP with this link:
https://github.com/Atrix-Dev-Team
This will be the new github organization to bring up CM7 for atrix.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice way to organize it all. Everyone is doing great on the effort. Why aren't you a recognized developer?
Package complete: /home/paul/motorola/system/out/target/product/olympus/update-cm-7.1.0-RC1-Olympus-1-signed.zip
4dcba3ef0da71b18c80cddf6142deda0 update-cm-7.1.0-RC1-Olympus-1-signed.zip
Remember, this is devs only for now until beta
OMG
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1186402
only serious folks!
Great work guys
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App
Congrats and can't wait. I don't have what it takes to alpha test :-(
Edit: When the source is released aren't you gonna somewhat have to start over?
Sent via the power of a unicorn's horn.
I'm getting:
Code:
make: *** No rule to make target 'vendor//olympus/proprietary/lib/libaudio.so', needed by 'out/target/product/olympus/obj/lib/libaudio.so'. Stop.
I'm stumped... though I'm tired. It's probably something blatantly obvious.
XGX5309 said:
I'm getting:
Code:
make: *** No rule to make target 'vendor//olympus/proprietary/lib/libaudio.so', needed by 'out/target/product/olympus/obj/lib/libaudio.so'. Stop.
I'm stumped... though I'm tired. It's probably something blatantly obvious.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
git pull
new fixes are there, now we have new bugs
with the current buzz of DrawSomething, I thought I would check it out but it doesn't seem to fit within the screen resolution of the galaxy mini.
does anyone know if it is possible to resize/change something in the APK file to get it to fit?
thanks in advance
as far as I know you can't, because it's not compatible with our "legacy"devices
as for editing the apk to fit your need you must get a permission from the developer to do that; or you will be kicked in the a**(just kidding)
It is possible if you get it from other sources, its difficult because of the size issue - but still fun!
As for resizing it, I've thought about it, maybe try it today
abdovar said:
as far as I know you can't, because it's not compatible with our "legacy"devices
as for editing the apk to fit your need you must get a permission from the developer to do that; or you will be kicked in the a**(just kidding)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
haha okay
AndyFox2011 said:
It is possible if you get it from other sources, its difficult because of the size issue - but still fun!
As for resizing it, I've thought about it, maybe try it today
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes please. I would really appreciate it
jaymino said:
haha okay
yes please. I would really appreciate it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right, I have a few complications here.... I decompiled it and there is a lack of files! I don't know if I can reaize it as there appears to be no images/xml's to resize!
Sent from my GT-S5570 using XDA
AndyFox2011 said:
Right, I have a few complications here.... I decompiled it and there is a lack of files! I don't know if I can reaize it as there appears to be no images/xml's to resize!
Sent from my GT-S5570 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks for trying though.
Much appreciated
When you say you decompiled it, do you mean you unzipped the APK file? Or are there more steps to it?
jaymino said:
thanks for trying though.
Much appreciated
When you say you decompiled it, do you mean you unzipped the APK file? Or are there more steps to it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I used apktool to decompile it
Sent from my GT-S5570 using XDA
abdovar said:
as far as I know you can't, because it's not compatible with our "legacy"devices
as for editing the apk to fit your need you must get a permission from the developer to do that; or you will be kicked in the a**(just kidding)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not if it's floss you don't, you don't need to ask permission even if they say so as long as it's under a correct license and you can't mix licences even under V2 of the GNU public license.
You might wonder how MIUI can be proprietary, well they can't and are not any more.
You can take anything and change it in any way without asking permission as long as you redistribute it under the same version of GNU licence.
AND YOU CAN DO SO IN ANY WAY YOU PLEASE.
When someone says that you can't, it just means they don't have a clue about the licence, the code or the intentions of the floss community, give them the finger and be done with them.
Jinxxed said:
Not if it's floss you don't, you don't need to ask permission even if they say so as long as it's under a correct license and you can't mix licences even under V2 of the GNU public license.
You might wonder how MIUI can be proprietary, well they can't and are not any more.
You can take anything and change it in any way without asking permission as long as you redistribute it under the same version of GNU licence.
AND YOU CAN DO SO IN ANY WAY YOU PLEASE.
When someone says that you can't, it just means they don't have a clue about the licence, the code or the intentions of the floss community, give them the finger and be done with them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cheers for that! That is the best explanation I have seen on XDA for ages!
Sent from my GT-S5570 using XDA
I have played a similar online game from the android market. I dont remember the game name but.
Jinxxed said:
Not if it's floss you don't, you don't need to ask permission even if they say so as long as it's under a correct license and you can't mix licences even under V2 of the GNU public license.
You might wonder how MIUI can be proprietary, well they can't and are not any more.
You can take anything and change it in any way without asking permission as long as you redistribute it under the same version of GNU licence.
AND YOU CAN DO SO IN ANY WAY YOU PLEASE.
When someone says that you can't, it just means they don't have a clue about the licence, the code or the intentions of the floss community, give them the finger and be done with them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seriously buddy, u should try becoming a lawyer. You'll make a good one lol
Btw thanks for providing some clarity on licensing
AndyFox2011 said:
I used apktool to decompile it
Sent from my GT-S5570 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for telling me about apktool.
I decompiled it and looked around the directory structure and opened some ascii text files... nothing more really.
There seemed to be a load of some kind of Assembly Language files
Maybe it's hidden somewhere? I may have a look at it again tomorrow...
Sent from my GT-S5570 using XDA App
Once again oneplus has violated the GNU GPLv2! But this time I will not be watching! I want to act, I'm fed up with the lack of source code!
I wrote issues in kernel repos (linux) for Oneplus 5
Link issues: https://github.com/OnePlusOSS/android_kernel_oneplus_msm8998/issues/8
In the next few hours I will contact Torvalds!
ErnyTech said:
Once again oneplus has violated the GNU GPLv2! But this time I will not be watching! I want to act, I'm fed up with the lack of source code!
I wrote issues in kernel repos (linux) for Oneplus 5
Link issues: https://github.com/OnePlusOSS/android_kernel_oneplus_msm8998/issues/8
In the next few hours I will contact Torvalds!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are the sources not there?
fjsferreira said:
Are the sources not there?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not updated
4.5.7 might not have required kernel changes...
---------- Post added at 08:06 AM ---------- Previous post was at 08:03 AM ----------
Also the owner of the kernel has a few days to post it.. Usually after the update has completely rolled out.
Two things.
First might want to have a look at what Linus has said before about it, before he hurts your feelings.
Second. Good luck really doing anything. As OnePlus is out of China nothing anyone can do will make a difference.
I am not saying it is right, just giving you a heads up.
https://github.com/OnePlusOSS/andro...mmit/ce3b536e35278f2971627c51fd5b263ab6b5b934
Gesendet von meinem Moto G 2014 LTE mit Tapatalk
I was told by a kernel developer the company/person has 30 days from the full roll out of the update to update the kernel source. I think you need to learn about GPL licensing. One+ has done a great job at releasing source even though some commits are squashed together.
Orion116 said:
I was told by a kernel developer the company/person has 30 days from the full roll out of the update to update the kernel source. I think you need to learn about GPL licensing. One+ has done a great job at releasing source even though some commits are squashed together.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh god
ErnyTech said:
Oh good
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But xaiomi never release source code , let act against them?
amar2cool99 said:
But xaiomi never release source code , let act against them?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Xiaomo release kernel source
ErnyTech said:
Xiaomo release kernel source
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No they released only once 5.1.1 (i think that was also leaked) for Redmi note 3, after that they never updated them.
Orion116 said:
I was told by a kernel developer the company/person has 30 days from the full roll out of the update to update the kernel source. I think you need to learn about GPL licensing. One+ has done a great job at releasing source even though some commits are squashed together.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He is wrong. The gpl doesn't allow for any lapse between release and source posting. It has to be made available the same time the kernel is released. As we know not everyone follows it.
amar2cool99 said:
No they released only once 5.1.1 (i think that was also leaked) for Redmi note 3, after that they never updated them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
they are crazy..
Thread cleaned,
Flaming other users is not allowed on XDA.
zelendel said:
He is wrong. The gpl doesn't allow for any lapse between release and source posting. It has to be made available the same time the kernel is released. As we know not everyone follows it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The GPL license does not have a specified time for release. The most common interpretation is immediately but that is not explicitly stated anywhere. So my answer is still correct. Also my friend works for an OEM.
Orion116 said:
The GPL license does not have a specified time for release. The most common interpretation is immediately but that is not explicitly stated anywhere. So my answer is still correct. Also my friend works for an OEM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Saying he works for an oem doesn't mean a lot. Many oem violate the gpl every day.
It is stated that it has to be made available upon request. Which means at any time after the kernel is released. Doesn't matter if it is 30 days or 30 seconds. It has to be made available.
ErnyTech said:
Once again oneplus has violated the GNU GPLv2! But this time I will not be watching! I want to act, I'm fed up with the lack of source code!
I wrote issues in kernel repos (linux) for Oneplus 5
Link issues: https://github.com/OnePlusOSS/android_kernel_oneplus_msm8998/issues/8
In the next few hours I will contact Torvalds!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You must be fun at parties.
Sent from my ONEPLUS A5000 using Tapatalk
im fun all the time