Any overclocking kernel for the lg thrill yet.....
Sent from my LG-P925 using XDA App
Not yet. Do you NEED one?
Sent from my LG-P925 using XDA App
Undervolt would be more needed right now, I don't think I need to squeeze anymore performance or battery life out of this thing. Once we get updated on GB and other things... then yeah overclock will be good. OC kernel right now would just make everyone complain even more about battery life.
Undervolt would be most excellent at this time
I'm not really worried about battery life my phone is plugged in 99% of the time because of my job just wondering if anything is out there that I missed or something on here
Sent from my LG-P925 using XDA App
lastdeadmouse said:
Not yet. Do you NEED one?
Sent from my LG-P925 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its not about u need it or not. Its all about you CAN or you CAN'T.
You can undervolt right now...use setCPU
Sent from my LG-P920 using xda premium
colbur87 said:
You can undervolt right now...use setCPU
Sent from my LG-P920 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
seeing as this is an LG THRILL 4G thread and your sig has a xoom and inspire, ill tell you something about the STOCK kernel..
you cant undervolt on this phone.. maby on the inspire.. and i remember that setcpu didnt really undervolt on my ARHD inspire but whatever..
as it stands... untill someone makes a custom OC or UV or both kernel for the thrill, we just have to wait.. the only custom kernel i know of that kinda works is for the O3D but even it isnt OC or UV enabled..
colbur87 said:
You can undervolt right now...use setCPU
Sent from my LG-P920 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so, again.. NO.. no you can't
I am assuming the Dev's are waiting for GB to get rolled out on this device before going ahead and messing around with an OC, UV kernel. Considering once that roll's out you would have to redo and remake a New Kernel which I would think would kinda defeat the purpose of making one at the moment considering GB "SHOULD" be out anytime now I think lol.
malickie said:
I am assuming the Dev's are waiting for GB to get rolled out on this device before going ahead and messing around with an OC, UV kernel. Considering once that roll's out you would have to redo and remake a New Kernel which I would think would kinda defeat the purpose of making one at the moment considering GB "SHOULD" be out anytime now I think lol.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
from what I've been reading on the Thrill development and O3D development forums, it has to do with the framework that LG uses..
the O3D and the Thrill uses a new tri- something system.. dual core + dual channel ram alternating between each other.. blah blah blah..
see.. the roms/ kernel that are out at the moment are basically the latest release of froyo that lg put out, with some mods done to the asthetics, and debranding or removing all the att apps that nobody really wants anyway.. no major re-programming has been done yet.. (devs are still figuring out this new system, or dont care to figure it out till a more familiar/popular release has come, namely Gingerbread or ICS..)
not to mention that the 3D aspect of the two phones requires its own kernel and as of yet, flashing another kernel on top of an existing one simply replaces the kernel.. the 3D needs the 2nd kernel to be flashed alongside the 2D kernel..
those two points are additionally preventing an OC or UV kernel since... well.. it would need to be re-written.. and since, as I have said.. the framework is still being figured out.. well... we'll just have to wait.. lol
at least thats what I have gathered from reading pretty much EVERY post in the two development sections..
The kernel source is available through LG. If someone wants to take the time to add in the ability to oc it can be done. I'm sure the same applies to UV (though I've never tried that on a kernel personally). I've looked into OCing the stock kernel a little bit and couldn't figure it out. Not quite as easy as it was on my Aria. The CPU tables were laid out real clear for that architecture. Not so much for the omap4 architecture. And I have as of yet not found anyone who's been able to help figure it out. I put it aside to concentrate on porting gb, which has been very slow rolling due to time constraints.
As for waiting for gingerbread, the kernel wont change since we already have the gingerbread kernel. Whether or not this kernel will be compatible with ICS I have no idea.
Sent from my LG-P925 using Tapatalk
Related
Now that the kernel source is available, won't we be able to overclock our mobiles?
Guess i got a little bit envious with all the overclocking that has being going on with other phones.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
A bit of using search never really hurt anyone before...
So is it possible yet.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Been possible for last 3months. Just find a kernel with oc support and get setcpu. Frankly its not worth it as setcpu is a piece of **** app that make your system unstable. As other poster said. Do a damn search
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
ickyboo said:
Been possible for last 3months. Just find a kernel with oc support and get setcpu. Frankly its not worth it as setcpu is a piece of **** app that make your system unstable. As other poster said. Do a damn search
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But for froyo? Maybe is asking for it.
maybe someone with the tallents could have a look into this OC method they use for droid x and milestone using a kernel module, this would enable us to overclock any froyo kernel.
http://androidforums.com/droid-2-al...d-2-overclock-kernel-module-instructions.html
It would be nice to have it in the kernel. 100 to 1200 that the system controlling like it already do. No setcpu crap.
Sent from GT-I9000 Jpm OS kernel with z4mod
ickyboo said:
Been possible for last 3months. Just find a kernel with oc support and get setcpu. Frankly its not worth it as setcpu is a piece of **** app that make your system unstable. As other poster said. Do a damn search
Yes for froyo and don't be so damn rude Muppet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
also setcpu is not to blame for the problems, as it runs just well on galaxy i7500 for overclocking. i´m not sure what the problem wit it is on SGS, but i´m pretty its not setcpu´s fault
FadeFx said:
also setcpu is not to blame for the problems, as it runs just well on galaxy i7500 for overclocking. i´m not sure what the problem wit it is on SGS, but i´m pretty its not setcpu´s fault
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The problem is that SGS doesn't like different CPU governors! It will only work if you don't touch the governor settings! At least that is what I have found to work in the Eclair builds!
FadeFx said:
also setcpu is not to blame for the problems, as it runs just well on galaxy i7500 for overclocking. i´m not sure what the problem wit it is on SGS, but i´m pretty its not setcpu´s fault
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seems ignorance is bliss for some of our fellow xda folks. SetCPU is not even needed for those oc kernels unless you want to change scaling from default schema. It really don't contribute to the unstablity, just that the kernels seemed inefficient.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
OrionBG said:
The problem is that SGS doesn't like different CPU governors! It will only work if you don't touch the governor settings! At least that is what I have found to work in the Eclair builds!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. Don't install SetCPU and the kernel is reasonably stable, but crashes miserably when running cup intensive apps. We have to work harder developing a kernel which works well for our hardware.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Prankey said:
I agree. Don't install SetCPU and the kernel is reasonably stable, but crashes miserably when running cup intensive apps. We have to work harder developing a kernel which works well for our hardware.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
kernel was very much stable. It is just that hummingbird is bad for overclocking. Not all phones can be overclocked, sadly.
dupel said:
kernel was very much stable. It is just that hummingbird is bad for overclocking. Not all phones can be overclocked, sadly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can understand what you are suggesting, however why was it still unstable when I tried to disable 1.2GHz or 1.13GHz frequency keeping the original scaling and running at 1GHz or less??
Is that 0.2 bump really noticeable?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
carlocb said:
Is that 0.2 bump really noticeable?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think 20% is noticable difference. Especially when using that crap of a browser we have.
Prankey said:
I can understand what you are suggesting, however why was it still unstable when I tried to disable 1.2GHz or 1.13GHz frequency keeping the original scaling and running at 1GHz or less??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dont know which version you used.
1.13 was quite old. All recent versions were 1.2. Anyway, nevermind =)
Yeah, do want a OC'able kernel - the 1.2GHz kernels for Éclair were always stable enough for me if I didn't try to UV it.
Id be open to using a 1.2Ghz OC if its 100% stable and no wake-up bugs and ofcourse should not affect the life of my CPU that much and should not drain my battery more than 10% faster
This kernel is for AOSP Gingerbread roms for the Incredible only!
Do not flash with ROM Manager, it has been known to give very strange issues on this phone, boot into recovery and manually flash it.
Things I add from stock (I believe in a mostly vanilla kernel with smaller mods to improve battery life and, in some situations, performance)
-havs (hybrid adaptive voltage scaling)
-smartass cpu governor (capped at 384mhz while screen is off)
-smb329 enabled (fast charge)
-no debugging (for smaller kernel size)
Use kernel manager from the market to get this (unless you want to be stubborn and do it yourself)
Pulled -5 and -6, not working as expected
invisiblek 2.6.37.6-4:
-Updated to latest cm-kernel source (latest change was May 30th)
-smartass and havs settings grabbed from the popular .32 #28 kernel which should help us get some decent battery life
Download
ENJOY!
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
SOURCE:
All of my source is at: http://github.com/invisiblek/cm-kernel/2.6.37_cm-kernel
We need to thank cyanogen, slayher, toastcfh, koush, cuviper, chad0989, cayniarb, vinylfreak89, seanzer, conap, jamezelle, and im sure others for all their help with this
FAQ:
Q: Will this work with Froyo?
A: Maybe, but probably not. I would recommend a .32 kernel since they are more stable at this time.
Q: My led turns green at 90% what gives? Please Fix!!
A: It always does that, been addressed a million times. Live with it
Q: Why is my cpu governor <x> when i set it to <y>?
A: <x> is probably the default (most roms set this in the ramdisk although the kernel does have a default setting, the ramdisk usually trumps it) youll have to re-set your governor after a reboot
Q: How can I help?
A: You can start by grabbing the source code from here
Q: What is havs?
A: from kingxklick's thread:
Code:
Also, a little info on HAVS and AVS:
The purpose of HAVS is to minimize the power used by the CPU by determining
and setting the optimal voltage. At the same time, the maximum voltage by
which HAVS can scale to is fixed to a specified voltage depending on the
CPU frequency in order to prevent scaling to a higher voltage than what is
normally used at a specified voltage. The optimal voltage is actively determined
for each frequency and temperature. HAVS actively adjusts the CPU voltage as the
CPU frequency and temperature changes.
Q: What is smartass?
A: The smartass governer drops drops the max cpu frequency when your screen is off (currently set to max 384mhz). It is very effective in saving battery life. (juice plotter is a good one for monitoring your battery life)
Put me down
Not much help with kernels but I can test and feed back
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
Same here.. Teach me how yo build.. All set up for it.. Just don't understand it
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
Love to help. Currently running your#29 kernel along with omgb rom. Runs awesome but I know it can do more.
any theories as to why all the other kernels make touch input useless? I have an amoled incredible btw. Anything I can do to test or help develop something to work fully with 2.3.1 I'm all for it.
P.s. Anyone know anything about jit with gb? I never used it since I have used sense roms up to this point.
Sent from my Htc Incredible using Tapatalk
invisiblek said:
for now, check my github://github.com/invisiblek/cm-kernel
we need a dinc community developed kernel for gingerbread
anyone who wants to help, post up and lets get something going
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://github.com/slayher
I have a working kernel, with support for tethering, and mounting of both emmc and sdcards. Also my same changes were pushed to the CM/htc-kernel-incrediblec
Its not a .35 kernel, but it does have the gadget drivers backported.
slayher said:
http://github.com/slayher
I have a working kernel, with support for tethering, and mounting of both emmc and sdcards. Also my same changes were pushed to the CM/htc-kernel-incrediblec
Its not a .35 kernel, but it does have the gadget drivers backported.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Doesn't the current included one support this? Does your kernel work with pc usb mounting without gscript?
Also personally I am looking for a stable oc version. Anyone had luck so far with any of this?
Sent from my Htc Incredible using Tapatalk
This is good. I'll help.
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
networkmagician419 said:
Same here.. Teach me how yo build.. All set up for it.. Just don't understand it
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Best way to get set up is to join is on irc. Its much easier to communicate there
Sent from my dInc using XDA app
trunksta said:
Love to help. Currently running your#29 kernel along with omgb rom. Runs awesome but I know it can do more.
any theories as to why all the other kernels make touch input useless? I have an amoled incredible btw. Anything I can do to test or help develop something to work fully with 2.3.1 I'm all for it.
P.s. Anyone know anything about jit with gb? I never used it since I have used sense roms up to this point.
Sent from my Htc Incredible using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's because you probably have a 004f touch controller. If you try to register more than 3 points on it, it won't function.
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
trunksta said:
Doesn't the current included one support this? Does your kernel work with pc usb mounting without gscript?
Also personally I am looking for a stable oc version. Anyone had luck so far with any of this?
Sent from my Htc Incredible using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes, this is the kernel I am using with the CM7 build for the DINC. CM7 mounts and tethers with out gscript.
http://github.com/slayher
I have a working kernel, with support for tethering, and mounting of both emmc and sdcards. Also my same changes were pushed to the CM/htc-kernel-incrediblec
Its not a .35 kernel, but it does have the gadget drivers backported.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Doesn't the current included one support this? Does your kernel work with pc usb mounting without gscript?
Also personally I am looking for a stable oc version. Anyone had luck so far with any of this?
Sent from my Htc Incredible using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's his kernel that is supplied with the cm7 builds.
Sent from my "girlfriend"... According to my wife.
Thanks for bringing this out to the full community! Hopefully we can get the ball moving a bit better on development now.
Also great to see pretty much every active kernel dev for the Inc posting in here, and a lot of other people interested in getting this going.
I'll keep pitching in however I can.
I also greatly appreciate all you kernel devs hard work and I look forward to the development of this kernel...I am a willing tester just waiting for a build to come out so I can report on it
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
Would gladly love to test
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
i see lots of devs i recognize here. this could be very interesting. and trustworthy ones too. i'll test.
invisiblek said:
Best way to get set up is to join is on irc. Its much easier to communicate there
Sent from my dInc using XDA app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe I should know this and I missed the memo... What server and channel...
what irc channel? this would be a big step to get going on the Dinc.
This is exciting .. cloning now
#incredible on irc.andirc.net
please update your tree too, ive done some more work this morning
use arch/arm/mach-msm/invisiblek_incredible_defconfig as your .config
im down to one compile time error -- woot!
This had probably been covered many times previously but due to the kernels being updated so often, I feel the need to discuss it.
The fact that I've tried loads of rims and now mixing it up trying kernels is just a coincidence :-D
So what do people think at the moment?
Im currently on ultimate 5.5 with the latest voodoo sound fix kernel.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Does mooned have anything to contribute?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
MarkyG82 said:
mooned
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol. 'Noone'
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
MarkyG82 said:
This had probably been covered many times previously but due to the kernels being updated so often, I feel the need to discuss it.
The fact that I've tried loads of rims and now mixing it up trying kernels is just a coincidence :-D
So what do people think at the moment?
Im currently on ultimate 5.5 with the latest voodoo sound fix kernel.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its a matter of preference that's why you won''t get many people to answer you.
If you want Top performance but feel adventurous and can live with slight niggles, then you can use Advanced Voodoo 666 1.2 where you can OC it to 1280hz. Its like being on the edge without falling over
Otherwise, if you want stable and performance balance, then head to Speedmod's Kernel
If you want extreme performance with sacrifice over battery life or stability, head to Super Optimized OC/UV Kernel
A detailed Guide by Tricky103 is available here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=10218039&postcount=23798
All the best!
Since it's not so much a hassle to flash new Kernels now
+1 for rajuki
Hey folks,
P-Funk asked me to take a look at the kernel source for the Zio and see what I could make of it.
I won't lie to you, its not pretty. However, determination usually prevails, and so I present you with a kernel, currently beta, with minimal support (I don't have a Zio).
Use at your own risk! I, nor anyone else is responsible for damage done from, or to your device. Your device may become unstable. Your cat may marry your dog, and your gerbil may elope with your daughter or son. This is not my fault.
Features
2.6.32.9 source built
overclocked to 748mhz
lowmemkiller driver patches and tweaks
Boots at stock 600mhz speed. You must use setcpu to overclock.
sdcard read speed tweak
init.d support
smartass and interactive governors.
bfq i/o scheduler added and set as default.
kernel is pre-rooted, and will start usb debugging by default.
swap support
Download URL:
http://www.multiupload.com/2GQA0JD1VS
How to install:
Download file, place on sdcard, boot clockwrok recovery and flash.
Please note: I am trying to upload source to a mercurial repo, but it is having issues. I have a trouble ticket in with bitbucket. The source is too big to upload to github for free. If I do not hear back from them, I will tarball the source and upload it that way.
Thanks:
Every single soul in IRC #openzio who broke their phones testing stuff for me
Thanks. Testing now.
Sent from my Zio using XDA Premium App
Much respect m8.
*looks at donate link*
Wink wink.
Sent from my Zio using XDA App
OK I flashed the Kernel and I am stuck at the Kyocera splash screen. Dont understand why its not booting up.
For those that cannot boot this, SPz0 has a more stable version that he will be releasing with his rom.
729mhz seems to be the most stable clockspeed for this device.
for those that are wondering, the smartass governor eliminates the need for a "screen off" profile by automatically capping the CPU speed when the screen is off/phone goes to sleep.
More info.
Smartass will also cap the max frequency when sleeping to 352Mhz (or if your min frequency is higher than 352 – why?! – it will cap it to your min frequency). Lets take for example the 528/176 kernel, it will sleep at 352/176. No need for sleep profiles any more!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In other words, SetCPU would only be needed to OC (or use the Overclock widget, whatever floats your cookies).
So this kernel is ready to use or wait? A little confused from your post.
ZIO 2.2 ROOTED
ADW Launcher EX
Gingerbread Theme
z3r0t0l0rEnCe said:
So this kernel is ready to use or wait? A little confused from your post.
ZIO 2.2 ROOTED
ADW Launcher EX
Gingerbread Theme
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No this one is unstable but there is one working and being tested as we speak, it should be released soon.
Would this work on a sprint device?
Fate43 said:
OK I flashed the Kernel and I am stuck at the Kyocera splash screen. Dont understand why its not booting up.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I flashed it with no problems. Did you clear your caches (dalvik, etc) with ClockworkMod prior to flashing?
Sent from my Zio using XDA Premium App
pomeroythomas said:
I flashed it with no problems. Did you clear your caches (dalvik, etc) with ClockworkMod prior to flashing?
Sent from my Zio using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would this work the Sprint version? Is the overclock stable on your device?
Androidboy35961 said:
Would this work the Sprint version? Is the overclock stable on your device?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No...
Androidboy35961 said:
Would this work on a sprint device?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No...
Sent from my Zio using XDA App
Spz0 said:
No...
No...
Sent from my Zio using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sprint users don't get no love at all...lol
Sprint got the short end of the stick!
Sent from my Zio using XDA Premium App
Trying out swap, seems to be neutral on this device.
748 Freezes and causes random reboots for me.
Great job man, and much thanks from all of us Zio owners for your time and effort, thanks Adrynalyne!
Any reason anyone can think of why or what in the kernel would cause 2d graphics to choke out so bad? I was scoring 110-120 prior to OCing, and now 2d is scoring 70 if I'm lucky. Any thoughts or ideas?
I thought this device could run at 800mhz??? I thought wrong. Cheap cpu they are using.
Androidboy35961 said:
I thought this device could run at 800mhz??? I thought wrong. Cheap cpu they are using.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why on earth are you such an ungrateful douchebag?
Why not contribute something constructive instead of showing people how douchey you can be...
OnTopic:
749Mhz ran flawless for me. It seems to be random on who 749mhz freezes with.
@sinisin: did you flash 749oc with the openzio rom?
My ROM has Adrynalyne's stable 729Mhz overclock for those interested.
Hey Adrynalyne:
Think I could grab an 800Mhz OC from you at some point? I really wanna push the boundaries of this cpu.
Just a straight step from 748 to 800Mhz would be sufficient.
I want to see if I can get it to run stable @ 800Mhz.
I think that would need some voltage tweaks to reach 800mhz
Sent from my Zio using XDA Premium App
Androidboy35961 said:
Sprint users don't get no love at all...lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All the cool kids have cricket
Cricket users are lucky to have any development, my roommates told me there wouldn't be any Dev's interested in the ZIO. I think the main issue you're encountering is any Dev who has the droid options available on sprint, is not going to choose the ZIO for their personal phone or development. You're best bet is to start reading like crazy and head the development of the sprint side of things yourself or upgrade to a phone that has active development.
Can Anybody make a Froyo Rom (CM6) or port one, for Example Froyo Pro, with OC Kernel
And with some ported things like new adreno libs?
Is it possible?
Sikorsky96 wants it too
Thanks for the answers
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
I'm pretty sure the Galaxy Ace originally shipped with Froyo, so I guess its theoretically possible, but the issue is, why would you? Downgrading the software on your phone doesn't make sense to me when GB, ICS (And hopefully soon JB) all run nicely on the Ace...
Obviously, if its possible but not in much demand, then a developer probably wont go out and do it, however, why don't you go and give it a go?
Oh man froyo is just perfect for gaming. Would love to see froyo running on my phone. And by the my phone already came with Ginger bread which I don't like so haven't had froyo on my ace ever. It would be awesome dud
To be honest froyo seems smoother to me than gingerbread. Always hated gingerbread. And ics wasn't made for ace in the first place. And its too buggy. It drained battery from 100% to 18 in less than an hour wtf.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
I wanted to make one , but I need to make a Froyo device config.....or rather a Froyo kernel .
Besides , the CM6 sources are heavily outdated , because their manifest still points to android.git.kernel.org
"Friends forever." - Ventus
Only battery life is good on froyo.Nothing else.games like angry birds lack,poor memory management,low api level which means less compatible apps.
Sikorsky96 said:
Oh man froyo is just perfect for gaming. Would love to see froyo running on my phone. And by the my phone already came with Ginger bread which I don't like so haven't had froyo on my ace ever. It would be awesome dud
To be honest froyo seems smoother to me than gingerbread. Always hated gingerbread. And ics wasn't made for ace in the first place. And its too buggy. It drained battery from 100% to 18 in less than an hour wtf.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In froyo, 3d games used to lag like hell. And the camera didnt have 480p option too!
In gb, everything is faster according to me.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk 2
Anyways, having cm6 would just add up to our forums flexibility you know having it wouldn't harm. And by the way I used to have a LG optimus gt540 I could run games without any lag on froyo but as soon as I installed Gingerbread I could no longer experience that smoothness so I had to go back to froyo. May be that's just that phone Gingerbread isn't that shi* now that I think about it
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Then can i request someone to make a cool froxo rom? (cm6)
It would be awesome with an OC Kernel and with some cm7 ported tweaks like adreno libs
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Mentafagyi said:
Then can i request someone to make a cool froxo rom? (cm6)
It would be awesome with an OC Kernel and with some cm7 ported tweaks like adreno libs
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
_________________________________________
Yep, add me to the list of people who would request for this.
Sikorsky96 said:
Oh man froyo is just perfect for gaming. Would love to see froyo running on my phone. And by the my phone already came with Ginger bread which I don't like so haven't had froyo on my ace ever. It would be awesome dud
To be honest froyo seems smoother to me than gingerbread. Always hated gingerbread. And ics wasn't made for ace in the first place. And its too buggy. It drained battery from 100% to 18 in less than an hour wtf.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess you never heard of Adrenaline Engine... Neither of any script
GB is much faster and better than Froyo.
And btw, ICS can be made for our device but samsung developers didn't even do anything to make it possible becauase, if they want us to get ICS, we need to buy one of their new phones...
Lol
Say no to Froyo.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
just for fun i downgraded from GB to froyo last month and i need to say it lagggggggggggggged like hell battery was not quite upto the mark to say goodbye to GB either.. with latest firmwares samsung did a fine job to make stock roms run faster.:silly:
Tovagulet said:
I guess you never heard of Adrenaline Engine... Neither of any script
GB is much faster and better than Froyo.
And btw, ICS can be made for our device but samsung developers didn't even do anything to make it possible becauase, if they want us to get ICS, we need to buy one of their new phones...
Lol
Say no to Froyo.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
_________________________________________
lol . It's just business, what do you expect. what would you do if you were them???
Anyways running ICS OR JB on our ace is absolutely possible but its like running win 7 or 8 on a pentium 2 pc with 128mb Graphics and 256mb ram .
and bro, I've had this phone for less than two month. since I bought it I have flashed nearly a billion roms and tweaks and patches and ...., they don't make a lot of difference, when you can't run better shoes won't do anything.