Database Develop

[Q] Ask Another Custom ROM for SGM?

Hi everyone
Anyone know how many custom ROM with good quality+stable for SGM S5570 ?
All I know only CM7(tried a lot and its satisfying enough) and some unoficial version of it(still not tried yet).
Someone know any better than CM7?

andro-id by same develoepr as CM 7.1 (tj_style).
parasmi's (Hope I got the spelling correct) emanoN rom - which is simple stripped down version of the stock ROM.

miui rom for galaxy mini
Can someone port miui rom on galaxy mini?

genieass said:
andro-id by same develoepr as CM 7.1 (tj_style).
parasmi's (Hope I got the spelling correct) emanoN rom - which is simple stripped down version of the stock ROM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok. I will try it. Is it a web or keyword?

nanotechx said:
Can someone port miui rom on galaxy mini?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Never tried. Besides isn't it for Samsung Galaxy S and S II? If there any info about MIUI released for SGM please tell me.

muhardo said:
Never tried. Besides isn't it for Samsung Galaxy S and S II? If there any info about MIUI released for SGM please tell me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Porting MIUI to the mini is almost impossible because MIUI is made for ARMv7 processors and the mini has an ARMv6, also I think MIUI is closed source, which means that you'll need to reverse engineer it first before porting it

Akath19 said:
Porting MIUI to the mini is almost impossible because MIUI is made for ARMv7 processors and the mini has an ARMv6, also I think MIUI is closed source, which means that you'll need to reverse engineer it first before porting it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
For those interested, here is some more info:-
http://technode.com/2011/04/14/rumo...ho/?utm_source=twitterfeed&utm_medium=twitter
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=951533
http://forums.miui.us/showthread.ph...-the-source-code-for-MIUI-interesting-article

I have tried all of SGM unofficial ROM. And I love minimodX ROM by r33p. Now, im still using this rom.
I just take the benefit from install unoffc. Rom, easy to root and can make internal memory freely. And i choose minimodX because have no bug.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1200563
Sent from my GT-S5570 using XDA App

thank's for your suggestion...
i will try it

Akath19 said:
Porting MIUI to the mini is almost impossible because MIUI is made for ARMv7 processors and the mini has an ARMv6, also I think MIUI is closed source, which means that you'll need to reverse engineer it first before porting it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That makes sense why I never heard any MIUI released for Galaxy Mini. But I heard (or rather misheard) its about to released for SGA. Is it true?

muhardo said:
That makes sense why I never heard any MIUI released for Galaxy Mini. But I heard (or rather misheard) its about to released for SGA. Is it true?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If that's true, we will try to porting to SGM, but if it's fake, we dont know we can port it, because MIUI rom is compile for arm7 not arm6, and we have to try port MIUI from SGS, some apk we have modify to mdpi support, but not working, need recompile library that support for SGM

Nuswan rom
Now, u can trying this ROM...
_______________________________________________
news: CM7 and ICS will be avaliable soon.
Just hoping..

CM9 till month same issues?

Hey guys,
I already tested the novaHD and some other ICS CM9 roms for our p990
But i see no Progress, but why.?
Same issues all the time Media Acceleration Video etc. Not working.
I googled and did not find any Information
Why is there no Progress?
No drivers?
Greetings from Germany.

No drivers. Its not the devs fault.
sent from my wii remote

The developers are doing a awesome work with ics. We should be glad that cm9 is working as good as it does despite lack of drivers.
Sent from my LG-P990 using Tapatalk

Looks like CM9 support has been dropped: http://review.cyanogenmod.com/#/c/16278/1/vendorsetup.sh
For how long who knows.

Ahh, then it depends on LG ?
sry that it sounded like i criticized the devs, it was not so meant.
For other devices (working) ics roms are available, because the drivers were released from the Manufacturers?
Thx 4 your answers

It is not entirely LG's fault for this, nvidia hasn't release the proper ICS binaries for this processor if i'm not wrong.
And somehow none of these devices having this processor has released ICS yet.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tegra

Read Ricardo Cerqueira google+ post, around the date of ICS Kang release. You will find lot of information and nothing have change.

What about?:
Kernel drivers from nvidia (3.1 linux based)
http://developer.nvidia.com/linux-tegra

Stevemeister said:
Whats about:
Kernel drivers from nvidia (3.1 linux based)
http://developer.nvidia.com/linux-tegra
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think that is for Linux.
Sent from my LG-P990 using Tapatalk

Stevemeister said:
What about?:
Kernel drivers from nvidia (3.1 linux based)
http://developer.nvidia.com/linux-tegra
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats for linux, doesnt help. it was already discussed bunch of times.
wait for nvidia/lg if it ever happens

Stevemeister said:
What about?:
Kernel drivers from nvidia (3.1 linux based)
[/QUOTE
Linux
LG=Lies Good
Inviato dal mio LG-P990 usando Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

lugi93 said:
thats for linux, doesnt help. it was already discussed bunch of times.
wait for nvidia/lg if it ever happens
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Happy I'm not having a p990

Thx 4 all your answers.
I Read some Threads --> Google TEGRA 2 ICS or P990 ICS Drivers
And i got one question :
Does nVidia not give the drivers to LG
or is LG not allowed to give us the drivers ?
or nVidia doesnt have any ?

Well, there is no Tegra2 phone with an official ICS ROM at the moment. Make of that what you will.

a500 has ics, and kernel source was released last week.

dabl8 said:
a500 has ics, and kernel source was released last week.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is not the same tegra 2. One is Harmony and the other is Ventana.
Inviato dal mio LG-P990 con Tapatalk 2

That doesn't even make sense. Harmony and Ventana are development boards, not chip types.
Phones have an AP20H, tablets have a T20.

ICS Drivers for Tegra 2...

Hi All,
i am not a developer and found this link which is having kernel 3.X.X.X drivers, so i thought they may be ICS drivers for Tegra 2 Ventana board, so can some one who is have knowledge on the Kernel please validate these drivers...
By using these drivers can we have H/W acceleration with ICS/JB...
Link:http://www.nvidia.com/content/devzone/linux-for-tegra.html

Cool thread : D
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda app-developers app

i dont know about that, but our board isnt a ventana board, it is a lg star board. ventana is a model of tegra 2

skylinegt77 said:
i dont know about that, but our board isnt a ventana board, it is a lg star board. ventana is a model of tegra 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
*Facepalm*
Optimus 2X uses Tegra 2 AP20H chip, and that is Ventana.
Sent from that Atrix.

Hi, unfortunately are the drivers for linux

tatperson said:
*Facepalm*
Optimus 2X uses Tegra 2 AP20H chip, and that is Ventana.
Sent from that Atrix.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thank you for your facepalm just before you confirm what i just said... loooool

tatperson said:
*Facepalm*
Optimus 2X uses Tegra 2 AP20H chip, and that is Ventana.
Sent from that Atrix.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, as far as I know, Android uses slightly modified Linux kernel. Starting from 3.X.X Linus T. started to include Android code into Linux. Anyway, conclusion is that provided code and binaries probably can be used to build fully-functional kernel for ICS, but it would be quite hard task and need a lot of effort. If LG will provide theirs plan to don't upgrade O2X, it looks reasonable to start such project, until that happened it can be waste of time.

skylinegt77 said:
thank you for your facepalm just before you confirm what i just said... loooool
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're welcome!
Sent from that Atrix.

frantic777 said:
Well, as far as I know, Android uses slightly modified Linux kernel. Starting from 3.X.X Linus T. started to include Android code into Linux. Anyway, conclusion is that provided code and binaries probably can be used to build fully-functional kernel for ICS, but it would be quite hard task and need a lot of effort. If LG will provide theirs plan to don't upgrade O2X, it looks reasonable to start such project, until that happened it can be waste of time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So do you think it will be very hard for kernel developers to include these drives in the 3.X.X kernel ...

mj.vikram said:
So do you think it will be very hard for kernel developers to include these drives in the 3.X.X kernel ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Obviously, it may need to develop kind of adapters between provided drivers and interfaces required by ICS. Unfortunately, I'm not aware of details regarding interaction between android (dalvik) and kernel, but according to my understanding it is possible.

[DEV's][BROADCOM] OPEN DIALOGUE WITH BROADCOM - MADTeam Forum

http://madteam.co/forum/general-77/(dev's)(broadcom)-open-dialogue-with-broadcom/
possible source for the gpu in the near future?

Possible cm7 in future
Open source will be never released,maybe new drivers

Well since broadcom is looking into the rom of the Y or Ace (not sure which one, because the topic was about ace, but was posted in Y Section) It is probably going to have full CPU and GPU Drivers

Qnrx said:
Well since broadcom is looking into the rom of the Y or Ace (not sure which one, because the topic was about ace, but was posted in Y Section) It is probably going to have full CPU and GPU Drivers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well let's hope so, so we can get CM7.2 on this baby? Also the broadcom guy just posted a new reply to that topic.
Any developers from here care to go over and offer what info they can to help speed this along or whatnot? He asks about the "Y" in his latest reply, if the sources are released will the devs be able to use them for CM7.2 for our S5380i?

Hi paradoxiumwind
you have to read a little more of Galaxy Ace "S5830" S5830 Young Galaxy and have the same CPU, same GPU, videocam IV .. totally the same drivers, the only thing that has more Galaxy Ace S5830 is a flash and other veicina screen 320 x 480 pixels, 3.5 inches ... I use Ace S5830 And talking with Broadcom to release some of the drivers that are essential, Broadcom seeks solutions to dismiss some of the drier gpu, to Mogo to create CyanogenMod, AOKP, AOSP ... and I understand for a lot more applications ... A full drivers for the GPU will come out a little later...
My nick on this forum is: AmirChe

Harley--TSI said:
Hi paradoxiumwind
you have to read a little more of Galaxy Ace "S5830" S5830 Young Galaxy and have the same CPU, same GPU, videocam IV .. totally the same drivers, the only thing that has more Galaxy Ace S5830 is a flash and other veicina screen 320 x 480 pixels, 3.5 inches ... I use Ace S5830 And talking with Broadcom to release some of the drivers that are essential, Broadcom seeks solutions to dismiss some of the drier gpu, to Mogo to create CyanogenMod, AOKP, AOSP ... and I understand for a lot more applications ... A full drivers for the GPU will come out a little later...
My nick on this forum is: AmirChe
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the explaination, so since they're basically the same hardware when they release the source for the "Y", we (I mean the devs) can use it for our i to get CM7.2?

paradoxiumwind said:
Thanks for the explaination, so since they're basically the same hardware when they release the source for the "Y", we (I mean the devs) can use it for our i to get CM7.2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes.

Yes, I think they will only need to be replaced LCS Density from 120 to 160. or in the extreme case, to update and to add some more oddatak .. The whole system is done everything works great, but we can not be installing, means You can not get to the entrance, squardzone tested and missing his only got one driver ... look at the dialogue I think there you have everything else you need

will we able to see ICS or JB?
now a question... I know, is too soon, but, will we be able to see Ice Cream Sandwich or Jelly Bean in our loved devices? I'd like to help...

gabboman said:
now a question... I know, is too soon, but, will we be able to see Ice Cream Sandwich or Jelly Bean in our loved devices? I'd like to help...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure, but they will run like ass? Our phones are not powerful. I will be happy with CM7.2

paradoxiumwind said:
Sure, but they will run like ass? Our phones are not powerful. I will be happy with CM7.2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cm9 & cm10 works perfectly on 5830. I hv used it. No lags. Then y do u say it wont work on this fone?
Sent from my GT-S5830i using xda premium

domnic79 said:
Cm9 & cm10 works perfectly on 5830. I hv used it. No lags. Then y do u say it wont work on this fone?
Sent from my GT-S5830i using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And on paper our Gpu is powerful..If it works well then cm7 should be the first step.
Sent from my GALAXY ACE on Ace cream v1.2

domnic79 said:
Cm9 & cm10 works perfectly on 5830. I hv used it. No lags. Then y do u say it wont work on this fone?
Sent from my GT-S5830i using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
andy.acei said:
And on paper our Gpu is powerful..If it works well then cm7 should be the first step.
Sent from my GALAXY ACE on Ace cream v1.2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM9 & CM10 Work Perfectly on galaxy GIO too. And apart from a greater PPI value, galaxy gio is lesser in sepcs as compared to Ace-i. I also think (And Hope) CM9 & 10 should work like a charm on 5830i as well in the near future. :good:

saeed14i said:
CM9 & CM10 Work Perfectly on galaxy GIO too. And apart from a greater PPI value, galaxy gio is lesser in sepcs as compared to Ace-i. I also think (And Hope) CM9 & 10 should work like a charm on 5830i as well in the near future. :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Specs do not matter much to run CM9/10. But you need good specs to run it smoothly. Even HTC G1, the first android phone, has Jelly bean but it lags.
Availability of drivers for chipset matters the most.

system.img said:
Specs do not matter much to run CM9/10. But you need good specs to run it smoothly. Even HTC G1, the first android phone, has Jelly bean but it lags.
Availability of drivers for chipset matters the most.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You right mate, we should move like Galaxy Y users, but here is everybody ""waiting"" for a miracle, but if all of we don't do nothing the miracle will not happens...

For people thinking we are going to be running CM9/10 smoothly on our Ace, read this: https://plus.google.com/+CyanogenMod/posts/MRnnvs3oFUF

paradoxiumwind said:
For people thinking we are going to be running CM9/10 smoothly on our Ace, read this: https://plus.google.com/+CyanogenMod/posts/MRnnvs3oFUF
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is old news.
It just means that they wont officially support snapdragon s1.

paradoxiumwind said:
For people thinking we are going to be running CM9/10 smoothly on our Ace, read this: https://plus.google.com/+CyanogenMod/posts/MRnnvs3oFUF
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It means cyanogen wont provide a official CM9 for our device. But developers here can make a port or tweak it to run in our device once all sources regarding the CPU/GPU/kernel are available. :beer:
Sent from my GT-S5830i using Tapatalk 2

schakusa said:
You right mate, we should move like Galaxy Y users, but here is everybody ""waiting"" for a miracle, but if all of we don't do nothing the miracle will not happens...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But i think if Galaxy Y can have the sources, we can get too, because we have the same hardware and bla bla bla.

InnerSanctum said:
But i think if Galaxy Y can have the sources, we can get too, because we have the same hardware and bla bla bla.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He think he meant that we should also support them as much as we can....so that broadcom really feels that there is an urgent need for the sources.
Sent from my GT-S5830i using Tapatalk 2

JB for HTC Desire C, I need some help

Hey guys I did everything and I can't port this rom to our device, can anyone try porting this rom? http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2056634

Impossible, all our dev's are trying too make a MIUI, CM9 or Ubuntu ROM.
Atm u can flash the Revolution ROM or the Nameless ROM.
Revolution:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2139305
Nameless:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1812583
Best regards

Sony make.belive said:
Ubuntu ROM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have they released the source for that??

tqbfjotld said:
Have they released the source for that??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, but we are waiting for this...

Sony make.belive said:
No, but we are waiting for this...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It would be awesome to have a full linux distro on your phone

tqbfjotld said:
It would be awesome to have a full linux distro on your phone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The closest you can do is just run the .img through terminal emu

Why is everyone so concerned with jb and ubuntu, did we forget this device has a 600MHz processer and half a gig of ram?
Wouldn't everyone prefer a functional device than a pretty paper weight?
Sent from my HTC Desire C using xda premium

I think you're underestimating it.

I'm interested if we can make an ubuntu touch lite or something later.