I usually get 10-20 fps in CSPortable,
My rom is Zeus v1 and my quadrant score is 2000.
Is there anything to do with this problem?
I've already tried chainfire3d with PowerVR plugin but no improvement.
ohadz said:
I usually get 10-20 fps in CSPortable,
My rom is Zeus v1 and my quadrant score is 2000.
Is there anything to do with this problem?
I've already tried chainfire3d with PowerVR plugin but no improvement.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
problem? sgs2 gets 20-25 fps so if you get anything more than 10-12 it is more than ok. I get around 20+ average on my o3d. So maybe it is a bug with phone builts as lower end phones get higher numbers (droids,sgs1).
20N is just a little slower then CM7+Nova11c.
on 20N i get around 2100 quadrant score and on CM7+Nova11c i get 2900 quadrant...
you can try it on CM7 but i also play the game and i got around 20fps
timvdhoorn said:
20N is just a little slower then CM7+Nova11c.
on 20N i get around 2100 quadrant score and on CM7+Nova11c i get 2900 quadrant...
you can try it on CM7 but i also play the game and i got around 20fps
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
quadrant is the most useless benchmark of all. It shows pbone on stock roms to be slower than it was under froyo while just by using it for a few secs it is clear that gb it is a lot snappier than froyo. All in all there are numerous benchmarks out there that do a decent job instead of quadrant which is lame. just take a look at how much I/O score counts on the overall final and you will get what I mean...
jimakos29 said:
quadrant is the most useless benchmark of all. It shows pbone on stock roms to be slower than it was under froyo while just by using it for a few secs it is clear that gb it is a lot snappier than froyo. All in all there are numerous benchmarks out there that do a decent job instead of quadrant which is lame. just take a look at how much I/O score counts on the overall final and you will get what I mean...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do you mean?
What are the bechmarks that you recommend instead of Quadrant?
Just for be able to post new thread. Sorry.
---------- Post added at 03:15 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:44 PM ----------
Just for be able to post new thread. Sorry.
Related
What does this say about my phone
Sent from my HERO200 using XDA App
That you took the screenshot at 11:08 p.m.? Are we playing "I Spy"? ....I give up.
I just mean...
I saw a post and people are getting scores in the 20s and 30s and mine was 3.... is there something I can do to make my phone faster
Sent from my HTC Hero with Froyo...
Vandelay007 said:
I just mean...
I saw a post and people are getting scores in the 20s and 30s and mine was 3.... is there something I can do to make my phone faster
Sent from my HTC Hero with Froyo...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you are confusing FPS (Frames Per Second that Neocore gives you) with MFLOPS (Million Floating-Point Operations Per Second). Your Hero can get as high as maybe 5.4 MFLOPS, at least that is the fastest I have seen.
All of these are arbitrary measurements that probably mean very little. it is easy to get caught up in it. I run CM6 and consistently get 4.7 MFLOPS at the stock 691 overclocking. If you hero can tolerate faster processor speeds, it will go higher.
Here, read this.....http://bugclub.org/beginners/math/mflops.html
smolck said:
I think you are confusing FPS (Frames Per Second that Neocore gives you) with MFLOPS (Million Floating-Point Operations Per Second). Your Hero can get as high as maybe 5.4 MFLOPS, at least that is the fastest I have seen.
All of these are arbitrary measurements that probably mean very little. it is easy to get caught up in it. I run CM6 and consistently get 4.7 MFLOPS at the stock 691 overclocking. If you hero can tolerate faster processor speeds, it will go higher.
Here, read this.....http://bugclub.org/beginners/math/mflops.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cool.. very educational..... lol
I just got about 22 fps
Sent from my HTC Hero with Froyo...
Coming over from fascinate forums and just wondering how the benchmarks test change when we actually get some froyo. I know they don't matter but it helps show the overall boost in performance so anybody with linpack or quadrant if u don't care please post ur results. Thanks n advance. Don't flame me, this will give u cappy users a chance to brag
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Quadrant scores stay pretty close to the same, mid 900's to low 1000's, linpack clocks in between 13.5 and 15
As has been mentioned in many other threads, Quadrant scores are biased toward Snapdragon processors.
These benchmarks really don't mean anything from one phone to another, but within the same phone model it does give an idea of improvement..
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
1842 Quadrant Score after OCLF on Froyo which is great compared to 900 before the fix
This is with RyanZA’s EXT2 Lagfix.
Full Quadrant: 1867 (Saw 67 FPS at one point) This is substantially lower than the 2.1 EXT4 Lagfix, but still twice as high as the stock score of 957. I know Quadrant really doesn’t mean anything.
Benchmark PI: 1445 MS
Linpak:
MFLOPS: 13.809
Time: 6.07 Seconds
Norm Res: 5.68
Precision: 2.22044
The "Billabond1 real life use" benchmark shows performance to be as good or better than 2.1. I went from cognition 2.1 w/ voodoo lagfix to cognition 2.2 w/ oclf. I would say that the performance is about the same, good, and the features in 2.2 make it totally worth the update.
On a fresh install of 2.2 I got 995 on my quadrant score.
When I finished rooting and putting on RyanZA's OCLF, my quadrant went up to 2105.
Never did a linpack
Is it normal to get only 905 points from quadrant with darky's9 and speedmod? Before updating from darky's 8 i did get 1245points.
jere92 said:
Is it normal to get only 905 points from quadrant with darky's9 and speedmod? Before updating from darky's 8 i did get 1245points.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant is rubbish, people can make themselves get quadrant scores of 3000 + so dont rely on that.. if your phone responds quick and it feels quick in your hand, thats all that matters.
azzledazzle said:
Quadrant is rubbish, people can make themselves get quadrant scores of 3000 + so dont rely on that.. if your phone responds quick and it feels quick in your hand, thats all that matters.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly, I had a 2000+ score with my old JPO+lagfix, now, i'm at ~1000 with my custom ROM, but the phone is so smoother, and it run without lagfix!
jere92 said:
Is it normal to get only 905 points from quadrant with darky's9 and speedmod? Before updating from darky's 8 i did get 1245points.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I had the same issue after the first 2 times booting up, but it solved itself after 2 more boots and now i am getting 1600 again.
Chris
azzledazzle said:
Quadrant is rubbish, people can make themselves get quadrant scores of 3000 + so dont rely on that.. if your phone responds quick and it feels quick in your hand, thats all that matters.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Quadrant scores are totally irrelevant. Insanity ROM has over 2000 but I have found Darky's is the smoothest out of them all IMO
if your phone is fast and responsive why care about quadrant?
it's nice and smooth, no problem i were just worried about if i did something wrong.
Quadrant is rubbish, is not relevant, if you make 2 or 3 tests consecutive there will be different results, so... if you're like how is your phone moving that means you obtain the best results.
I still don't understand why people stick to their quadrant scores. Of course it is fun, but if you can do stuff with your phone and no annoyance like lag or whatsoever. Who cares whether quadrant score is 100 or 200?>
finally gone from stock rom to gingerdx 014 YAY!
Ran a quadrant advanced benchmark and noticed I dont get anything displayed when it goes through the first two 3D benchmarks aside from the FPS and frame numbers at the bottom. (the corridor one with stairs and I forget what the 2nd one is).. Then I get the DNA strand 3rd bench test which shows up fine and it displays a result of 1124 ???
Is it missing out the display of these for a reason?! Hopefully not to artificially bump up the quadrant score?!? surely not?
Anyone else noticed this?? Or is my gingerdx install a bit fubar?!
Installed from stock 2.1 using CWM after doing a full wipe and dalvik wipe..
Black screen in 3d tests except DNA is normal on all Gingerbread roms(like GDX).
But that bug does not affect on scores.
Don't worry.
PS:
I'm not sure but, The newest version of quadrant from the market can work normal without bug.
Scores will be the same.
Thanks for that.. I was only joking about the scores.. I will download the latest version and try that. I thought I may have done something wrong and wondered why mine wasnt displaying the tests
lancemark said:
PS:
I'm not sure but, The newest version of quadrant from the market can work normal without bug.
Scores will be the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right, 3D work with quadrant 1,17 but the score is smaller! I use the advanced version.
With odl quadrand I get a score about 1100. With new quadrant I only get around 950
blue4you said:
Right, 3D work with quadrant 1,17 but the score is smaller! I use the advanced version.
With odl quadrand I get a score about 1100. With new quadrant I only get around 950
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've noticed the same thing. I get 1100 in the old one, 892 in the new.
mine is around 2600 what about yours ?
mine is around 3400 with a sbf clean cm7 install ovc 1.2ghz an some other tweaks i dont wana list em all lol
2200 :/
/10char
my original droid scores a 1500 1.25ghz cm7 did alot to that phone lol
jellman said:
mine is around 3400 with a sbf clean cm7 install ovc 1.2ghz an some other tweaks i dont wana list em all lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't do anything on my phone yet. Just rooted it and removed all unused apps.lol , i'll do it soon anyway
I wish D3 had more RAM :/
jellman said:
my original droid scores a 1500 1.25ghz cm7 did alot to that phone lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh hey original droid. that was long time ago haha. anyway it's still good right ?
DoubleYouPee said:
2200 :/
/10char
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
have you rooted it yet ? i just rooted it and installed Darkdroid Rom
it works really well and makes my D3 faster.
junparin said:
have you rooted it yet ? i just rooted it and installed Darkdroid Rom
it works really well and makes my D3 faster.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes i'm rooted and on MAVrom.. is the score really that bad?
Mine gets around 3300 on cm7 with the OC to 1.2
Sent from my ics XT862 using xda premium
Sent from my XT862 using xda premium
junparin said:
Oh hey original droid. that was long time ago haha. anyway it's still good right ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yea dude i love that phone
I'm at 2350 on the stock Bell 2.3.6 firmware.
Rooted and debloated but no overclock.
single core
This may be a stupid question not sure im pretty well versed in android anyway quadrant standard only shows one core on system info anyone know why? Is this normal?
Mine is 2332 running SteelDroid 4.0 with not a lot of debloat done to it.
marx1369 said:
This may be a stupid question not sure im pretty well versed in android anyway quadrant standard only shows one core on system info anyone know why? Is this normal?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've noticed that as well
Sent from my XT860 using xda premium
Quadrant is pretty garbage imo. I keep seeing videos on youtube of 2 phones starting quadrant at the same time, 1 phone finishing 5-10 seconds ahead of the other but still losing the benchmark #'s with most results (fps in the testing) appearing the same. If it was decent the faster phone would always get the higher benchmark, 2 phones render 1k frames, phone 1 in 10 seconds, phone 2 in 20, fps on phone 1 must be higher... etc etc I'd try maybe smartbench or glbenchmark
Willis111 said:
Quadrant is pretty garbage imo. I keep seeing videos on youtube of 2 phones starting quadrant at the same time, 1 phone finishing 5-10 seconds ahead of the other but still losing the benchmark #'s with most results (fps in the testing) appearing the same. If it was decent the faster phone would always get the higher benchmark, 2 phones render 1k frames, phone 1 in 10 seconds, phone 2 in 20, fps on phone 1 must be higher... etc etc I'd try maybe smartbench or glbenchmark
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've started using antutu benchmark since it breaks the score down and allows you to run custom tests
Sent from my XT860 using xda premium
If you're looking for other benchmark apps with other numbers I found this thread where a user posted a list of benchmarks on an optimus 3d (basically same hardware as our phone) after installing an optimus 2x performance tweak. Good for the list of benchmarks and numbers for you to compare, thread is here