Database Develop

Post your bench!

All day...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Suck it stock IncS.

3651 at that same frequency.
my loss of points was SD card because I'm using a class 2 16gb card, not the 8gb class 4 that came with it.

Different benchmarks as I took them a few weeks ago, but could be interesting for the sake of comparison anyways. The first picture was taken at stock clock speed using the Quadrant benchmark. The second was taken @ 1209MHz and the third @ 1401MHz I believe (I didn't take note so it may vary +- 100MHz). I wasn't brave enough to go any higher Although I know that the Tiamat kernel could allow you to go up to 2.0GHz which is just ridiculous. Setup shown in my signature.

ARHD 1.1.7 and Quadrant Advanced.

itsbeertimenow said:
All day...
Suck it stock IncS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was wondering what ROM you were using on that test?
Sent from my Incredible S using xda premium

AnTuTu
Quadrant

More recent

this competition may lead to some bricked devices..anyways will make a good paper weight...

Sent from my inspire 4g using cm7 n259

to all the benchmark freaks:
i tested several roms using antutu benchmark. when i compare my results with other IncS results i get less points (between 2600-2900). the main difference i saw are the points CPU integer (~740 , but others guys had ~1000) and CPU floatpoints (~320). tried on cleam roms and roms i tweaked with beater etc..
is it possible that i harmed my CPU with OC/UV in the past?
are my UV settings restored to default after flashing a new rom?

shiningarmor said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's not an incredible s, and if it is, congratulations you have the worlds fastest Incs.

itsbeertimenow said:
That's not an incredible s, and if it is, congratulations you have the worlds fastest Incs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All I know is that guy has an Incredible S phone and today isn't national trolling day, right? So this even is actually possible, but still very hard to believe. Even though he managed to overclock it's GPU then it's more reasonable...
So here's my benchmark http://www.upload.ee/image/1850697/2011-11-29_22-45-30.png -.-

shiningarmor said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
specifications please. thats really amazing bechmark !

highKo said:
to all the benchmark freaks:
i tested several roms using antutu benchmark. when i compare my results with other IncS results i get less points (between 2600-2900). the main difference i saw are the points CPU integer (~740 , but others guys had ~1000) and CPU floatpoints (~320). tried on cleam roms and roms i tweaked with beater etc..
is it possible that i harmed my CPU with OC/UV in the past?
are my UV settings restored to default after flashing a new rom?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
tried the new virtuous rom now, still same results :-/

highKo said:
tried the new virtuous rom now, still same results :-/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The uv/oc setting s are always restored to the kernel default once your phone is restarted unless you have your app set to "set on boot" which is never a good idea as bricks are made this way. And yes when you flash a new Rom it installs a new kernel and your setting s are set to the kernels default until you set up your oc app from wihtin your Rom.

I always failed on 1.5Ghz ~ 2.0Ghz. It was stop working and freeze. Anyone succeed?

keroro430 said:
I always failed on 1.5Ghz ~ 2.0Ghz. It was stop working and freeze. Anyone succeed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That bench was clocked at 1804 it tottally depends on which Rom your using and which kernel. That was cm nihtlies and I can't remember the kernel, all I remember was the title contained the words "lightning fast". I've used roms with kernels that won't let you surpass 1.1 ghz and I've used ones that let you o.c. to 2.1. Weather or not your phone locks up is a different story. It doesn't seem to matter if its sense or aosp as I've had both clocked over 1.8. Generally the phone will freeze if you have uncompatible settings and it tries to run more than 4 processes at once.

here's mine.
Cyanogenmod 7 Nightly + Lord Clockan's kernel also ICS theme really looks great.
This bench is at 1.6Ghz but normally it's set to ~1.2Ghz and get almost 3 days battery life.
Incredible S is an incredible phone!

Quadrant 1.1.7 Score, post your config and results!

Hello guys!
First post here and this is the first time I overclock my P990!
I'm currently using CM7 Nightly 156 + Vorkernel 2.6.32.41 with Ginger 2.3.5.
My best Score with quadrant was 3949 points @1408Mhz

Equinox_br said:
Hello guys!
First post here and this is the first time I overclock my P990!
I'm currently using CM7 Nightly 156 + Vorkernel 2.6.32.41 with Ginger 2.3.5.
My best Score with quadrant was 3949 points @1408Mhz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Before something changed I was able to get 3400 with 1Ghz and vorkkernel

So, this means that my score is bad?
What can I do to make it better?
Stock phone I was scoring like 2700, Volkernel 1Ghz like 2900 and now at 1.4Ghz with 3900.
Stock Galaxy S II scores something like 3200 if I remember.
Maybe you were running 1.1.6 version of Quadrant no?

that just score, and in benchmark, you will not see difference between 3000 and 3400 when you use it. the best combination is, when you feel a very big woow.
i got that feel with latest GO Launcher EX, and stock v10D with latest neoblaze [email protected] ext4, i removed cardock or what, and now i see a very very big difference with a very good standby time.
very fast scrolls in browser, gallery, and settings and launcher, install apps 5x faster, take shot 2x faster with camera, and the speed in browser is extremly fast. it boots much faster, you can try init.d tweaks for memory management.
and now... you can spend your time with make your homescreen, or skin nicer and nicer, and then share with us

With topogigi v1.7, OC at 1,4GHz got 4110 in quadrant!
At 1GHz was 3231
Edit with v1.9 +SP1 & HP kernel RC1 @1,4GHz "4416"

Custom kernels support "epeen enlargment".
Thats a different aproach to how sql database writes which doesnt make difference in speed in real use but makes a huge diference in benchmarks.
Where you see "sql hack" avoid it. No real advantage and it could be a potentcial data loss.
So there is a big part of the change

Wow...Reading this I feel like I still have to learn a lot about Android developments! hehe
In general I'm very satisfied with my phone, its fast, stable, never had an error.
I'll see if I can touch the 4000 score without increase processor speed, any tip?
I'm currently using CM7 Nightly 156 + Vorkernel 2.6.32.41 with Ginger 2.3.5.
Edit:
Guys, my 3g network was bad and I tried to restart my phone, when initializing he froze on LG logo (second one). I tried to replace the Kernel and had no success, so I had to reinstall CM7!! And the phone worked....I think that the problem was a Vorkernel update that I made by a program called Vorkernel update inside the OS!
Now I'm using the stock kernel from CM7 till get home at least. I ran Quadrant again and got 3143 point @1.0Ghz! That is a lot! hehe

Leaked GB 2.3.4
1.4ghz NeoBlaze ROM
Quadrant 1.1.7
2760 score. My phone is broken
Ah.. 3182 now, overclocking program wasn't working!
3658 run two...
3710 run 3.. nice.
Restored phone, went to Topogigi 1.9, 1.4ghz still, now getting around 4600... much better.

Topogigi 1.8 sp1
1,4Ghz
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Topogigi's 1.9...

justclimb said:
Topogigi's 1.9...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unable to download..:-( :-(
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA App

4260 with Topogigi's 1.9 and 1.4Ghz oc daemon!

indyjones83 said:
4260 with Topogigi's 1.9 and 1.4Ghz oc daemon!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
4586 for me ;-)

2541 At stock looks like a bad score to me :/
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA App

Striatum_bdr said:
4586 for me ;-)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While we're having a pissing contest...

Mungulz said:
While we're having a pissing contest...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeap, in Topogigi's thread a guy showed a nearly 5000 screenshot with some tweaks of his own..
It's probably good to remind that tweaking a ROM to have better scores in benchmarks doesn't mean a better user experience in practical use.
When you know which tests are made by the benchmark app, you can optimize the dedicated part of code in ROM to have better results, it dosn't mean the entire ROM will be snappier. The most famous is sqlite optimizations as all benchmarks use sqlite tests...
So it can give a good idea but it's not the Holy Bible...

2369 on stock rom for me. I wonder if my phone is not performing like it should. No custom kernels.

Soulj4h said:
2369 on stock rom for me. I wonder if my phone is not performing like it should. No custom kernels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine on stock 2350-2600
So dont worry
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA App

I'm thinking if I should install the neoblaze kernel on stock

You should, if you have spare batteries
Sent from my LG-P990 using Tapatalk

Benchmark scores on ICS

LG OPTIMUS 2X ICS 4.0.3 Alpha kang 15
Quadrant: 2503
Antutu: 5373
nenomark2: 27.7
Linpack: 47.166

my quadrant ended up at 2550
with gingerbread I had 4100, damn how i miss that overcloaking.
* Edit
Running ICS now with 1.4GHz and scored 3374 on quadrant

This is my O2X.
ICS Nova HD+ R7-17 Ironkrnl,32MB RAMhack
1312 MHz
----------------------------
AnTuTu : 6684
Quadrant : 3013
Linpack: 78.669
________________________
1500 MHz
----------------------------
AnTuTu : 7372
Quadrant : 3467
Linpack: 88.632
________________________

Quadrant 3152
Antutu 6377
Nova R7-17 + Ironkrnl, 1312 Mghz OC
Nearly double my old Captivate

zereke said:
my quadrant ended up at 2550
with gingerbread I had 4100, damn how i miss that overcloaking.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Quadrant app is updated with new score now...
It gives lesser than what it used to give earlier
Sent from my Optimus 2X using XDA

My score
ROM :ICS 4.0.3 Alpha kang 15
Kernal : Ironkrnl 48mb RAM Hack
CPU : 1.5Ghz
Quadrant : 3545
Antutu : 7003
Nenamark2 : 33.7fps
Linpack Mutli-thread : 83.9MFLOPS

Here my benchs as Screenshots
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA

world_of_ursus said:
Here my benchs as Screenshots View attachment 939209View attachment 939210View attachment 939211
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
A what clock speed?

almighty15 said:
A what clock speed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It must be 1,3 or 1,4 GHz. It would be too much for lower frequency.

greate scores guys. im thinking to overclock to. but im waried about battery life. is there difference in battery life? and what kernel to use for overclocking with ICS rom kangs from owain94

My bad... wrong section.
Sent from my LG-P999 using XDA

oleg1981 said:
greate scores guys. im thinking to overclock to. but im waried about battery life. is there difference in battery life? and what kernel to use for overclocking with ICS rom kangs from owain94
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've never noticed lower battery life after overclocking. Only when you use full power for longer time it drains battery faster.
About kernel for Kang you should use ironkrnl. Everything important you can find here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1517301

Afaik, overclocking it's actually just changing the maximum clock frequency, right? Which is only used according to CPU use. If your phone is on idle it will use the minimum configured CPU frequency, so it would not have an impact on battery drainage, only when you're doing CPU demanding tasks.
However, other than battery drainage, it will increase the temperature your CPU reaches when performing these tasks, which might lead to instability. As I've never come across an app or game that lagged, that is why I don't overclock, I don't see the point in risking CPU overheat.
Has anyone seen any difference while playing a game or using an app from regular clocked to an overclocked CPU?

what is the best overclock frequency i should tune for x8??

i'm using ginger dx v28> and i flashed overclocking after the Rom So What Is the best frequency to assign as i'm using setcpu 3.1 >

For Stock Kernel .

Set it to as high as you can without the phone rebooting itself the best frequency varies between phones as far as I know
Sent through my X8

love_story99000 said:
i'm using ginger dx v28> and i flashed overclocking after the Rom So What Is the best frequency to assign as i'm using setcpu 3.
I usually gets 710 with stock kernel as best with smartass governor. But u can always test in different clock.
Sung to you by a walkman.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Anything below 787 is stable for me (stock kernel) smartass/ondemand.
Sent from my X8 using xda premium

so ghost if i raised the frequency above 710 , in further way it will affect my processor or not ???

it's rebooting after it reach 787>but the question here does it affect on processor efficiency

and min Frequency stay as it is or it can be higher too ?????
and thanks all of u for ur replies

love_story99000 said:
it's rebooting after it reach 787>but the question here does it affect on processor efficiency
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No all It does is make ur CPU faster
Sent through my X8

OCing will always affect your processor. It's what it does.
Your oc value, in my experience, is dependent on the user (eg: smoothness/performance vs battery life). Stick with what works for you (but always mind you temp - just to be safe). I can oc above 710 but i rarely go above that cause it's more than enough for my daily/normal use, though i raise it when playong games.
Yes min frequency can be changed. There are a lot of ppl who know mre abt this than me, but (again) personally i prefer to set it at minimum and simply change governors when needed (i set it to on demand when watching videos).
Hope that helps.
Sent from my X8 using xda premium

cascabel said:
OCing will always affect your processor. It's what it does.
Your oc value, in my experience, is dependent on the user (eg: smoothness/performance vs battery life). Stick with what works for you (but always mind you temp - just to be safe). I can oc above 710 but i rarely go above that cause it's more than enough for my daily/normal use, though i raise it when playong games.
Yes min frequency can be changed. There are a lot of ppl who know mre abt this than me, but (again) personally i prefer to set it at minimum and simply change governors when needed (i set it to on demand when watching videos).
Hope that helps.
Sent from my X8 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what is governors and how to change it . i see it in option but i don't change any th

I'm not an expert in overclocking area... but as far as I know a governor is like a whole configuration pack for the CPU behavior: how it must act when the phone is sleeping, how it must act when it "wakes up", how and when it must jump from max to min values... I think that governors can be changed using the performance menu if you are using a cm7 based rom, but they can always be changed from the main screen on setCPU. The group of governors you can use depends from the kernel you have, I think. You can about some governors here: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=843406
For me the one who has better balance between battery length and cpu speed is smartass V2. Hope I have helped. Good luck!

Oc will affect the cpu life i guess and the battery consumption. Governor will manage the cpu and the battery usage. Eg.when the phone sleeps, wakes, etc. U can use smartass on stock kernel and smartass v02 on custom kernel. From what i read, smartass affect dsp manager.
Hope it helps.
Sung to you by a walkman.....

okai thanxs all i see governor icon in setcpu i wanna the rates of the option in governor to adjust it as i'm using stock kernel
powersave bias 0
ignore nice load 0
show differential 0
up threeshold 0
sampling rate 400000
or is there any other app for govenor only
plz reply me

Im not sure if i understand correctly.
In setcpu there are a couple if tabs. In yhe main tab is where we change freq and governors:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Now if you want to edit your a governor further you go to the governors tab:
Now the thing is the governor tab changes depending on the governor you set in the main tab. For example, smartass will let you edit more values the, lets say, ondemand.
Now when you're in the governors tab simply tap on the option you want to change, change the value, then hit apply.
Hope that helps.
Sent from my X8 using xda premium

i use
cpu: 748 mhz
gob: smartassV2
it goes well
in addition i have swap of 256mb
good luck =)

[Q] is it normal i can run cpu without problemsat 864MHz?

hi there !
as written in the topic i'm using gingerzaraki rom and i overclocked till 864MHz and it looks like normal, without any problems? i ask this because most of people don't run at that frequency

white_cat said:
hi there !
as written in the topic i'm using gingerzaraki rom and i overclocked till 864MHz and it looks like normal, without any problems? i ask this because most of people don't run at that frequency
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What a lucky guy!!!!
Absolutely it can decrease your x8's life due damages to chip set & overhead.(+high battery drain)
anyways overclocking more than 729 MHz is not recommended (by me)
& over clock to 864 just in benchmarking
Sent From My BEAST , I mean X8

white_cat said:
hi there !
as written in the topic i'm using gingerzaraki rom and i overclocked till 864MHz and it looks like normal, without any problems? i ask this because most of people don't run at that frequency
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's too much overclocking
But your CPU can handle that
Some device get rebooted on 787+:sly:
sent from.......
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

i guess i will scale at a lower frequency, i wouldnt like a burned phone but it seemed cool at 864

white_cat said:
i guess i will scale at a lower frequency, i wouldnt like a burned phone but it seemed cool at 864
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol! it will not burn that requires too much heat ...
But it will decrease life definitely
sent from.......

Firstly you can't burn phone with overclocking.
Seconldy, stability of cpu depends on the level of batery. For example: My phone runs 806mhz without any problem when batery is fully charged. When baterry level is about 60% my phone is much more unstable. So try to set this frequency when your battery level is low.

Are you sure its x8?
Lol
What have you done to your phone??:what:
:good: as long as you don't have any problem its ok

Do a big smile, because you are lucky. And this is normal, the 7x27 chips can handle 8-900 MHz without any problem, but the most x8 owner have low quality SoC with 600 MHz, the high quality chips marked and sold as 7x27T with 800MHz default clock (you can find it in low end galaxy models and other phones what equipped with 7x27 but the default clock is 800 MHz).
Wait while the battery level is only 10-15% and burn the phone with games/benchmarks. If the phone not freeze while the battery turn to empty, you can use this frequency (when the battery level is low, the cpu got lower voltage, this is normal, the difference not significant, only few mV but sometime this is enough to make the phone unstable).
Sent from my E15i using xda app-developers app

i used 864MHz when battery was at 7% and i did antutu benchmark score was about 3780...it's stable also with very low battery
anyway the score wasn't so good i guess because sdcard is really bad
i will post screenshot of battery and antutu as soon as i go again at low batter

white_cat said:
i used 864MHz when battery was at 7% and i did antutu benchmark score was about 3780...it's stable also with very low battery
anyway the score wasn't so good i guess because sdcard is really bad
i will post screenshot of battery and antutu as soon as i go again at low batter
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
:what:
This score is very good:thumbup:
Mine is only around 2500 without overclocking
sent from.......

I dont think theres any life drop on the cpu when overclocking too much - contrary to what people believe. Ive oced dozens of cpus and havent seen one burn and die from that. All modern chips will simply reset if they cant handle it.
My shakira can easily handle 800+ so its always running at these levels since i got it. And yea, its better at benchmarks like this
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app

nobodyAtall said:
I dont think theres any life drop on the cpu when overclocking too much - contrary to what people believe. Ive oced dozens of cpus and havent seen one burn and die from that. All modern chips will simply reset if they cant handle it.
My shakira can easily handle 800+ so its always running at these levels since i got it. And yea, its better at benchmarks like this
Sent from my Galaxy Nexus using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Soo
Shall we overclock at maximum possible value??

You men are lucky. I just insmod the overclock module and the system fails in seconds

xWhiskey said:
You men are lucky. I just insmod the overclock module and the system fails in seconds
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you are the only one whose system crashed just after using insmod command

Gogeta said:
I think you are the only one whose system crashed just after using insmod command
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Aye. My mother always said I was special.

xWhiskey said:
Aye. My mother always said I was special.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can you write in detail the steps you did? the module and insmod.
[cAs]

cascabel said:
can you write in detail the steps you did? the module and insmod.
[cAs]
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The ROM already had the module, but it wasn't provisioned for in hw_config because of possible instabilities. All I did was to insmod it via Terminal Emulator just to see if the overclock was possible, but the system crashed almost instantly. When the ROM was still fresh, it actually managed to work, but everything was extremely slow and laggy. My idea is either that the stock kernel or the ROM just don't do that well with overclocking, so I just abandoned the concept completely. Besides, I'm satisfied with the performance anyway. No need for perfectionism here