A quick thought about the CM9 we have now... - Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

I was thinking, would it be possible to unpack CM9 and the Leaks we have available at the moment and inject the things that are working in the Leaks into CM9 that dont like the camera.apk etc or does it not work like that?
For me personally the camera was the only reason i didnt stick with CM9.. also would chainfires rooted kernel work with CM9 or is it built specifically for the Leak.
Sorry if it sounds dumb but you dont know unless you ask

I don't think you even have to worry about it, as the person who maintains CM9 for the Note is surely doing just this

joshnichols189 said:
I don't think you even have to worry about it, as the person who maintains CM9 for the Note is surely doing just this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed.. but just as a temporary fix? Something to tinker with... lol

I see where you are going haha. I don't have any idea how hard it would be, or I'd give you an actual answer sorry

Related

porting cm6 to droid x

has anyone ever talked about doing this?..i know team douche isnt working with the X but id love to see cm6 on the x...but i dont have the brain to pull it off..or even know if it could be pulled off?
Bumping...
Sent from my DROIDX using XDA App
bumping to and why?...ive seen one post about this and it was like 4 months ago...
I had cyanogen on my eris and i loved it. CM6 on the X would rock! Im sure it is a daunting task with the way the X is locked down. Someone has to figure it is a challenge worth undertaking at some point.
i think one of the main reasons they cant is because you cant flash custom kernels on the X..but i would die for some cm6 love on the X
Jaxon2319 said:
i think one of the main reasons they cant is because you cant flash custom kernels on the X..but i would die for some cm6 love on the X
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can't be done until bootloader is unlocked....search and read before pointless threads.
Just an FYI... Its in the works. Obviously we wont have everything CM6 has because of the kernel issues, but we will have a lot. And its being worked on right now. So, this thread isn't useless
Its just gonna be a while, so dont hold your breath.
LexusBrian400 said:
Just an FYI... Its in the works. Obviously we wont have everything CM6 has because of the kernel issues, but we will have a lot. And its being worked on right now. So, this thread isn't useless
Its just gonna be a while, so dont hold your breath.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
how do you know?
Did you really just question Beesely's word on potential in-progress developments?
Wow... lol.
LexusBrian400 said:
Just an FYI... Its in the works. Obviously we wont have everything CM6 has because of the kernel issues, but we will have a lot. And its being worked on right now. So, this thread isn't useless
Its just gonna be a while, so dont hold your breath.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lmao...still makes this a useless thread...lots of people are working on things....Google is working on Gingerbread ...still don't need a thread about it...lol
No worries and not fighting with ya...and don't really care to much...lol
I asked a question there was one other thread about this like 4 months ago....if you don't have an answer for the question then leave the thread....if this thread being here really bothers you that much then you have issues...its not pointless cause I want to know if anyone had any info on it
Sent from my DROIDX using XDA App
My point should of been that You could do some searching or research and get ur answer easily.
CM6 Roms are not possible for us right now because we can't load a custom kernel on our devices.
We should be able to eventually get a mostly all AOSP ROM on our phones, but it will never be truely built from source until we can load a custom made kernel and break the bootloader.
Most of the great stuff in CM Roms is reliant on Koushs and other teamsouche memnlbers custom kernels...so having a CM6 Rom on our Droid X without a custom kernel is kinda lame....cool still....but would be missing all the great stuff CM6 has to offer...hence why CM6 doesn't support our Droid X right now.
Shoulda just answered u in the first place....sorry bout that been having a bad week and shouldn't of been a dbag about it.
Cheers
acidbath5546 said:
Lmao...still makes this a useless thread...lots of people are working on things....Google is working on Gingerbread ...still don't need a thread about it...lol
No worries and not fighting with ya...and don't really care to much...lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What good is a forum if we cant talk about stuff thats developing? I agree, its gonna be kinda lame without the kernel mods, and it wont be official, but SUPPOSEDLY someone I talk to is doing what they can with what we are given to work with.
Heres to hope...
Cheers.
acidbath5546 said:
My point should of been that You could do some searching or research and get ur answer easily.
CM6 Roms are not possible for us right now because we can't load a custom kernel on our devices.
We should be able to eventually get a mostly all AOSP ROM on our phones, but it will never be truely built from source until we can load a custom made kernel and break the bootloader.
Most of the great stuff in CM Roms is reliant on Koushs and other teamsouche memnlbers custom kernels...so having a CM6 Rom on our Droid X without a custom kernel is kinda lame....cool still....but would be missing all the great stuff CM6 has to offer...hence why CM6 doesn't support our Droid X right now.
Shoulda just answered u in the first place....sorry bout that been having a bad week and shouldn't of been a dbag about it.
Cheers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ahh no problem...it happens to the best of us...i just want the little nick nacks that come with it...like on the pulldown bar with the power controls...
Jaxon2319 said:
ahh no problem...it happens to the best of us...i just want the little nick nacks that come with it...like on the pulldown bar with the power controls...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I hear ya...me too

[REQ} Voodoo for DL30

I don't think I"m the only one looking for this, but I"m sure it will happen at some point, till then I have DL09.
Cheers all!
Crap, wrong thread... I should have put this in Development?
General.
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Also they don't need a request for every thing just give some timeeeeeeeee patience is a virtue
jt is working on it
this is kinda ridiculous...might as well go for broke:
i request gingerbread with a 9000mhz voodoo45 kernel that runs on solar power
lmao nitsuj17
nitsuj17 said:
this is kinda ridiculous...might as well go for broke:
i request gingerbread with a 9000mhz voodoo45 kernel that runs on solar power
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, then want it themed by nitsuj17...cause he is the bomb.
nitsuj17 said:
this is kinda ridiculous...might as well go for broke:
i request gingerbread with a 9000mhz voodoo45 kernel that runs on solar power
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll have it to you yesterday
imnuts said:
I'll have it to you yesterday
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
we can always count on you
nitsuj17 said:
this is kinda ridiculous...might as well go for broke:
i request gingerbread with a 9000mhz voodoo45 kernel that runs on solar power
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Pssst, whatever, if we're going for broke, then I'm gonna be pissed if JT doesn't have a Honeycomb Superclean ROM, Voodoo OC'd to 1500 with solar and moonlight powered, so I don't even need a battery, ready by tomorrow..... I mean, come on, they've had the Honeycomb SDK for what, like 4 days now.......
Wasn't trying to upset people, if I could have deleted I would have....
Posted from Super Clean, DL09 Fascinate with Voodoo 5 kernel.
DarthCivicus said:
Wasn't trying to upset people, if I could have deleted I would have....
Posted from Super Clean, DL09 Fascinate with Voodoo 5 kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not just you though...
How would voodoo be ported to DL30? I am just curious on what differences there are? is it just the libs that would need to be changed or what? I am not trying to request it or anything, I am actually just curious. I know the devs will release it when they feel it is good to go to the masses.
Where's the setting to print money?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Daswolven said:
Where's the setting to print money?
Sent from my SCH-I500 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine builds me an island and then turns into a jet and f***ing flies me there.
DarthCivicus said:
Wasn't trying to upset people, if I could have deleted I would have....
Posted from Super Clean, DL09 Fascinate with Voodoo 5 kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The only problem is that waaay too many people are requesting EVERYTHING although its only been a few days since 2.2 was leaked/released. Hell one person was asking about Android 3.0.
Kaze105 said:
The only problem is that waaay too many people are requesting EVERYTHING although its only been a few days since 2.2 was leaked/released. Hell one person was asking about Android 3.0.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
requests, usually, are fine...the issue is when something new comes out...everyone wants the exact theme, enhancements, mods, etc they had on their previous setup...this simply isnt possible overnight or even really soon.
relative to other devices, the fascinate has a smaller amount of people that work on it some capacity...dev wise we have 5-6 people that build roms/kernels and look at what theyve put out already in a few short days.
theme wise we dont have the bgills, jsinlegacys, etc of the android world that truly know frameworks/apks inside out...its mostly a few of us that have a relatively good idea of what we're doing porting themes, and making some of our own (well alternate gb versions or something lol)...if i wanted to for example, i could prolly just do quick and messy ports of the frameworks of every theme ive done before in 2 days or something...but i tend to go beyond that with apps and such like others do here
so on my end at least (and i think i can speak for a few others) stuff will come out when its ready...now i understand that themes vacated by people no longer around like retrokid cause some anxiety as it seems no one is working on them...but if theyre popular enough people pick them up (i took on revolution)...so give it a few weeks guys
Is a voodoo port even possible on the .32 kernel before samsung releases the source? Since we only have a leak I imagine it will be a bit before official release of the .32 source for the fascinate. I'm loving DL30 so far but definitely notice some of the lag now that voodoo is gone. But as nitsuj17 said this should be expected anytime you upgrade to a new release. Gotta give our excellent devs some time to port.
prometheus1010 said:
Is a voodoo port even possible on the .32 kernel before samsung releases the source? Since we only have a leak I imagine it will be a bit before official release of the .32 source for the fascinate. I'm loving DL30 so far but definitely notice some of the lag now that voodoo is gone. But as nitsuj17 said this should be expected anytime you upgrade to a new release. Gotta give our excellent devs some time to port.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
jt is working on voodoo from what i gather...i wouldnt put it past him to get it to work...its apparently one of the few things *possible* is still really hard to do...without source
It's been discussed before. You can use a binary kernel to build a custom version using config.gz, provided it was included with the kernel build. Without that, it would be almost impossible.
Ultimately, having the source directly from Samsung is the best way to get a custom kernel.
I really can't wait for some of the 2.3 kernel stuff to start trickling down, since it has ext4 built-in natively. Then we won't need voodoo, it will just be that way already.

i dont understand, why so many ics roms based on an alpha?[rant]

already about 5 ics roms not counting the cm9 alpha, why??
they all have the same bugs
they all have the same things working
super ics kangorama?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1360567
koush's + launcher pro added..
nexus mv ics?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1364411
koush's + glados kernel + v6 supercharger
ultimate ics?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1363765
koush's + some extra wall papers + file explorer
all these things are just a completely alpha ics build with some hacks thrown in.. why?? why not just make a post in the ics thread (either by kwiboo or koush) saying "hey guys use launcher pro if you feel its buggy" or "here is link to glados kernel" instead of making "New ultimate sweet fast ICS rom" when all you are doing is downloading one of the actual source built ics roms and opening it with 7zip and dropping in a new boot.img in there then asking for donations :/
/rant
It is no different than the numerous GB/CM based ROMs. Who cares?
Bounced off a tower to a forum near you!
I think that He ( OP ) won't be happy until they say Beta.. its alpha for a reason. so many bugs much more than beta. just sit happy with GB and give it time. I rushed it and lost the ability for Google Wallet, nothing can fix what went wrong with my phone.
xjreyes said:
I think that He ( OP ) won't be happy until they say Beta.. its alpha for a reason. so many bugs much more than beta. just sit happy with GB and give it time. I rushed it and lost the ability for Google Wallet, nothing can fix what went wrong with my phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What happened? I had wallet set up and ready to go, tried it at rite aid and wouldn't go through...
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
these people couldn't be taking part in a hobby for them, could they be just trying to learn the ins and outs of android, heck they couldn't even be kids learning to code and all are getting excited to show off what they complied.
Last time I checked you were not required to flash every rom in the Dev section. So lets take a step back I don't like miui nothing wrong with it but should I be complied to start a thread asking why we have topics about when I don't care for it.
icecoldbong said:
/rant
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You said it....
Chill out. We have to get AOSP working bug-free in the first place, then they'll start looking different. Even CM9 doesnt have any CMsettings or anything special. We're sorry that something that we're beating Google at (ICS release for NS) currently is not to your standards.
In due time.....in due time.
I see where the OP is coming from, but I disagree. The fact that the devs work hard to bring the OS to our devices is pretty appreciated. They pretty much do Google's work for free by modifying the code.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
icecoldbong said:
already about 5 ics roms not counting the cm9 alpha, why??
they all have the same bugs
they all have the same things working
super ics kangorama?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1360567
koush's + launcher pro added..
nexus mv ics?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1364411
koush's + glados kernel + v6 supercharger
ultimate ics?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1363765
koush's + some extra wall papers + file explorer
all these things are just a completely alpha ics build with some hacks thrown in.. why?? why not just make a post in the ics thread (either by kwiboo or koush) saying "hey guys use launcher pro if you feel its buggy" or "here is link to glados kernel" instead of making "New ultimate sweet fast ICS rom" when all you are doing is downloading one of the actual source built ics roms and opening it with 7zip and dropping in a new boot.img in there then asking for donations :/
/rant
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you missed these two.. http://goo.gl/bdy4w and http://fitsnugly.euroskank.com/sammich/crespo/
i can probably find you a few more if you would like more variety
simms22 said:
you missed these two.. http://goo.gl/bdy4w and http://fitsnugly.euroskank.com/sammich/crespo/
i can probably find you a few more if you would like more variety
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol im not mad that they are all buggy, im mad that people are "deving" with a buggy base and just adding to it. why not be a little patient, if you cant create it/build it from source, wait til the base you will be using to 7zip and copypaste into your rom becomes stable. dont use an alpha build to promote your name
icecoldbong said:
lol im not mad that they are all buggy, im mad that people are "deving" with a buggy base and just adding to it. why not be a little patient, if you cant create it/build it from source, wait til the base you will be using to 7zip and copypaste into your rom becomes stable. dont use an alpha build to promote your name
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think you quite understand how it works currently. There is no buggy base. They're attempting to adapt AOSP source code to compile and execute correctly on the Nexus S. This is way more complicated than you think. Almost all "bugs" you see are byproducts of tinkering with configurations, compile-ations, etc, in an attempt to get it working properly.
To put things in perspective, ICS development for the Nexus S is light years ahead of all other devices. For that reason alone, we should be grateful. Others are still struggling to either boot, or get somewhere AFTER boot.
If you don't like the way it's done, then wait for the official ROM. You have a choice, after all.
nickmv said:
I don't think you quite understand how it works currently. There is no buggy base. They're attempting to adapt AOSP source code to compile and execute correctly on the Nexus S. This is way more complicated than you think. Almost all "bugs" you see are byproducts of tinkering with configurations, compile-ations, etc, in an attempt to get it working properly.
If you don't like the way it's done, then wait for the official ROM. You have a choice, after all.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yes, two roms are getting built from the source on xda; kwiboo and koush. then all the others.
both kwiboo and koush thread is full of bug reports of people using a different rom like brainmaster, ultimate ics, kangorama ics, etc.
all this does is add confusion from the rom chef adding things to the original rom developers work
what im suggesting/ranting is that if a rom chefs should be a little more patient in making more spinoff roms that don't really add much besides to confusion for noob users
Your argument makes a LOT more sense now. I agree, if people are posting bugs in Koush/Kwiboo sections when running brainmaster or other tweaked versions, then that's bad.
Your original argument didn't really point this out.
Not much can be done about that, aside from aggressive moderation. Tweakers will be tweakers.
nickmv said:
Your argument makes a LOT more sense now. I agree, if people are posting bugs in Koush/Kwiboo sections when running brainmaster or other tweaked versions, then that's bad.
Your original argument didn't really point this out.
Not much can be done about that, aside from aggressive moderation. Tweakers will be tweakers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most of the bugs posted are not even valid. One in particular is known issue even on the GNexus.
The biggest issue I see is code optimization at this point.
One thing I think no one has mentioned is ICS may never be super fast on the NS. I will be much faster on dual core hardware
Bounced off a tower to a forum near you!
RonnieRuff said:
One thing I think no one has mentioned is ICS may never be super fast on the NS. I will be much faster on dual core hardware
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is one thing that has been bothering me as well. Every single one of these ROMs are not truly as smooth as Gingerbread. In no way do they even reach the fluidity found in Gingerbread ROMS. The hardware acceleration helps, but even then you can still feel the difference between the two Android releases. I have yet to hear a proper explanation as to why this is happening and I was hoping that the fix for this would be Google releasing the official Ice Cream Sandwich update.
Is it is code optimization as you say? Or is there more to it than that? I want to believe that hardware doesn't play a significant role here.
Eclair~ said:
This is one thing that has been bothering me as well. Every single one of these ROMs are not truly as smooth as Gingerbread. In no way do they even reach the fluidity found in Gingerbread ROMS. The hardware acceleration helps, but even then you can still feel the difference between the two Android releases. I have yet to hear a proper explanation as to why this is happening and I was hoping that the fix for this would be Google releasing the official Ice Cream Sandwich update.
Is it is code optimization as you say? Or is there more to it than that? I want to believe that hardware doesn't play a significant role here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agree 100% no released rom before ota is even out is worth running.. I ran koush or w/e and it worked but felt like I was holding a brick.. ruff! Brainmasters straight looks like android donut.. but so does cyanogens.. no disrespect to any of the above.. but htcclay is god..
Edit: wasn't brainmaster it was some one else.. sorry
Sent from my iPhone 4S using Siri
BLEEDCOLORYOU said:
Agree 100% no released rom before ota is even out is worth running.. I ran koush or w/e and it worked but felt like I was holding a brick.. ruff! Brainmasters straight looks like android donut.. but so does cyanogens.. no disrespect to any of the above.. but htcclay is god..
Edit: wasn't brainmaster it was some one else.. sorry
Sent from my iPhone 4S using Siri
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Strange, I've found that Koush's latest (CM9 Alpha 11) is plenty fast, not significantly slower than GB. Definitely Kwiboo v2 was slow as molasses, but then again it came out days ago (a long time when it comes to how fast things are moving). BM v5 is pretty fast but buggy. Also, it seems that adding franco kernel to any of these also speeds things up significantly, but I haven't tried it with CM9 Alpha 11 yet.
oakamil said:
Strange, I've found that Koush's latest (CM9 Alpha 11) is plenty fast, not significantly slower than GB. Definitely Kwiboo v2 was slow as molasses, but then again it came out days ago (a long time when it comes to how fast things are moving). BM v5 is pretty fast but buggy. Also, it seems that adding franco kernel to any of these also speeds things up significantly, but I haven't tried it with CM9 Alpha 11 yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I found kwiboo's to be a lot more stable than koush's. although koush's had more functionality.. my bluetooth didnt work, and i got many errors.
Understand that we are using old binaries. ICS will run just as good as gingerbread, if not, better. These will make a world of difference
RonnieRuff said:
One thing I think no one has mentioned is ICS may never be super fast on the NS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd kind of disagree with this. In its current early state here on the NS, I've gotten it running butter smooth and highly responsive, on a 1.1 OC/UV kernel. This is WITHOUT tweaks to filesystem, etc. If certain apps would just display properly when GPU Rendering is turned on, and some battery stuff worked out, I'd be 100% content.
Now granted, I've seen it running on the SGS2 and Galaxy Nexus and they're clearly speedier, but in my experience, my apps run just as fast as they did in GB.
On a side note....wanna see slow? It's been ported to the T-Mobile G1! HA! The first, original android phone!
I agree. there was actually a recent article on android police about this. There is no problem with people making their own roms but don't clog up the development section with "roms" that really all they do is bundle some easily downloadable market apps and some wallpapers and call it a new rom.
What the SGS2 xda forum actually did was split the dev section into 2 . One for original dev work and one for spin offs.

[Q] CM9 ICS Q&A Galaxy Note

I`am real excited about this rom and i think others are too so i can imagine people having questions.
Don`t want to clutter up the dev section so i took the liberty to create this thread so people can exchange and share all kind of CM9 related stuff if you want
Will it have all of the S-pen functionality and the Samsung S- apps? Like S-memo?
Samsung hasn't developed the S pen ability on ICS yet, so it will take a while .
I'm not touching a ROM unless it's official.
Maybe I've grown up, but flashing ****ty buggy ROMs is not for me anymore.
bharat4ever said:
Samsung hasn't developed the S pen ability on ICS yet, so it will take a while .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is that insider info
bharat4ever said:
Samsung hasn't developed the S pen ability on ICS yet, so it will take a while .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But the S-Pen SDK is available. Don't know if that helps, but... Yeah..
Sent from my iPad GT-N7000 using xda premium
Any luck changing DPI? I could daily this fine if I could just get things to not be so jumbo. Tried 2 programs from market and both (even after new superuser install) wont keep settings.
ericshmerick said:
I'm not touching a ROM unless it's official.
Maybe I've grown up, but flashing ****ty buggy ROMs is not for me anymore.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When I flashed CM7 on my nexus one, it was far from ****ty and buggy. I'd call it official in its own way; rather refined, actually, with better performance and many more features than my previous "official" ROM. I don't know anything about CM9 yet, though.

[Q] Android 4.2.2 for x8?

More like a rage, than a question, but... why is there no one trying to port 4.2.2 for ours x8?
Many lower spec phones have a port, wich to be fair, do have bugs, but at least have it. What happened to the x8 dev scene? Many thanks to nAa for keeping x8 alive, but is there no one else that can scratch the surface of 4.2.2? Plus with the .32 kernel aren't things supposed to be fair easily in porting?
I see nAa wrote 4.1.0 is coming, but... i sure would want 4.2.2 for my baby
gocegi said:
More like a rage, than a question, but... why is there no one trying to port 4.2.2 for ours x8?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is a developer forum, if you want it, try to make it, if you can't, then don't complain about it.
Go back to eclair if you are not satisfied with the development so far.
gocegi said:
More like a rage, than a question, but... why is there no one trying to port 4.2.2 for ours x8?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Many users can't get 4.0 even
see boot animation without rebooting
gocegi said:
More like a rage, than a question, but... why is there no one trying to port 4.2.2 for ours x8?
Many lower spec phones have a port, wich to be fair, do have bugs, but at least have it. What happened to the x8 dev scene? Many thanks to nAa for keeping x8 alive, but is there no one else that can scratch the surface of 4.2.2? Plus with the .32 kernel aren't things supposed to be fair easily in porting?
I see nAa wrote 4.1.0 is coming, but... i sure would want 4.2.2 for my baby
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I must admit that I am working on that but I'd prefer you to be patient in this area
For experience of 4.2.2 we need many requirements, ex:
unlocked BL
A new kernel (for bugless roms)
Enough knowledge for cooking kernel(we need to partition internal memory{for heavy 4.2.2} which was not necessary on gb)
Jtag tools (cooking kernel is a sensitive progress & hard bricks is so regular)
& just some developers have the knowledge & tools for cooking
#& I'm pretty sure if a recognized developer cook that kernel there will be a lot of roms for working on it
Sent from my E15a using Tapatalk 2
gocegi said:
Many lower spec phones have a port, wich to be fair, do have bugs, but at least have it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Which phone you are talking about
see boot animation without rebooting
Gogeta said:
Which phone you are talking about
see boot animation without rebooting
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can't you tell when someone talks BS? There are no devices lower spec'd than ours running 4.2.2
CtrlAltDelIrl said:
Can't you tell when someone talks BS? There are no devices lower spec'd than ours running 4.2.2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How funny, the guy that trolls everyone about not using the search button, failed to use it. The only BS talking comes from you my friend by playing smartass and looking dumb at the end.
Here educate yourself lil bit, and "use the search button"
LG p350 Me, cyanogenmod 10.1
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2054438
guys lets not start a flame war here.
@op
learn to wait.
naa himself said that he is working to release android version 4.x for our device..
so it's possible that we might get 4.2..
Well I must say I'm surprised that they've got it working on such a POS phone..
I don't think the experience would be up to much though with so little ram and microsoft's (LG) cheapo hardware ideology..
CtrlAltDelIrl said:
Well I must say I'm surprised that they've got it working on such a POS phone..
I don't think the experience would be up to much though with so little ram and microsoft's (LG) cheapo hardware ideology..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Judging from changelog, development seems a tad easier over the fence. Kernel version is up to 2.6.35.

Categories

Resources