Related
Hi guys,
What is better to go for? Galnet MIUI or the official one?
Thx.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
No answer?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Up.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
official MIUI i think
Galnet is more tweaked and themed. Not much of an difference.
I like galnets better. More themes and tweaks.
I used to prefer the Galnet version, but there's too much going on now and since it split from the MCG versions I've had way more issues (from clean installs) than with the MIUI.us build, which just seems more stable. Ideally Galnet would be working with the Chinese devs, but this doesn't seem possible. As a result, the ROM feels increasingly like there are being changes tacked on. It has improved immeasurably over time, and a lot of fixes have actually come from Galnet himself, but for a daily ROM, it's a little too bleeding edge for me now.
Currently on stock, odexed JVQ and to be honest, the Samsung software has got so much better I might stick with this for my battery and sanity! Until the flash bug comes again!
My vote goes for galnet, because it is a very stable rom would be also my all day rom if there wasn't the battery drain.
Galnet Miui is good but consumes battery heavily.
Official MiUi. But both suffer from heavy battery drain which makes it impossible to use it for day to day use.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Even i want to know which one is better? Commonsense says Galnet should be better since it is over and top of what is provided by MIUI. The commonsense was defied in some of the earlier release.
Bigger is Issue the MIUI vs Samsung ROM - MIUI User Interface vs Samsung ROM Stability, Speed & Battery.
Flasholics Paradox!
Thx for all the answers. You guys make me want to go for last Samsung ROM with ANDROiD 2.3.4 I'm actually on CyanogenMod nightlies.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
I've mostly used Stock, DarkyROM and MIUI.
Never had battery life better than I've had with Galnet (well GingerReal was pretty close) and overall I am very happy with Galnet.
That being said, Darky is a very nice product and a very nice community of people at the boards. The releases are pretty steady and the past versions allow for some better selection in actual working versions than some other ROMs.
go for Galnet MIUI.. Much more features, Nicer looking, Battery life has been FIXED no more battery drain.
Galnet is better than official. IMO
azzledazzle said:
go for Galnet MIUI.. Much more features, Nicer looking, Battery life has been FIXED no more battery drain.
Galnet is better than official. IMO
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
azzledazzle said:
go for Galnet MIUI.. Much more features, Nicer looking, Battery life has been FIXED no more battery drain.
Galnet is better than official. IMO
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Hands-On Premium App
I want swype keyboard for my galnet miui rom on sgs i9000 help please..tnx
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
azzledazzle said:
go for Galnet MIUI.. Much more features, Nicer looking, Battery life has been FIXED no more battery drain.
Galnet is better than official. IMO
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
_____+1______
I've tried CM7 & MIUI but there battery life suck... Can someone suggest a good rom-kernel combo for extended battery life?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
Hybrid 10.1 seem like one f the smoothist and nice to look at rom's I've tried.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
miggio said:
Hybrid 10.1 seem like one f the smoothist and nice to look at rom's I've tried.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I asked about the one with the best battery life, not the one that "nice to look at".
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
Hi,
During the time I tried plenty of kernels and roms, I was very impressed by the galaxy EE kernel for the battery life. With normal usage (phone, sms, download, games) but without 3g, my battery lasted around 4 days.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1137595
About the rom, I did not test myself, but heared a lot of positive feedback for GingerReal2, which is very stable and smooth http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1155623
If the rom is very responsive and does not have plenty of candy and shiny fireworks, this would mean you can tune your cpu with lower speed, which will lower the battery consumption (which is possible with galaxian kernel)
I hope it helped you ;-)
Have fun !
P.S. I am surprised that you have bad battery life with CM7, because it is a very good one for that point if I remember well... Did you try to tweak the system when you installed it ?
I have had cyanogenmod 7 and miui and try a lot of kernels!
Cm7 is very good also with stock kernel, but I think that Cyanofortomorrow v1.2 is very good! You can dwl it with stock kernel or with platypus kernel.
Miui is very nice but battery life is not the best! I have a mintberry rom with glitch kernel v13.
The best kernel in my opinion are glith kernel V13 HL (smartassv2, sleep governov powersave) and platipus neo 18 didle (deep idle). For less battery drain it's very important understand wich modem phone is better for your geographic area and operator.
Did anyone get their hands on the Android 4.0.4
http://www.engadget.com/2012/02/08/android-404-rom-leaks-for-galaxy-nexus-lte/
Can we expect better battery life and how long will it take for the first i9000 4.0.4 roms then?
Thanks
waiting eagerly..... for a better battery backup and smoothness through this 4.0.4
yess
...yess that would be nice , a better battery life..... *dreaming of*
Did any of the Rom developers see this thread and might starting to port 4.0.4?
They knew it long befor us. Ill bet theyre already working on it
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
still source not released
Battery life ofcourse I want it.
Only problem I find with the ICS rom is battery life. It's hardly alive for 4 hours with heavy usage ...
I get 12hours of heavy usage on cm9
Anyone wants 4.0.4 stock ??? Can port that. Tweet me if u want so @GoyalBhuvan
I do!
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
Me too! (10 char)
I found no problem with ICS 4.0.3, especially battery life.
Only problem I'm having in 4.0.3 is the super fast battery drain, other than that its pretty much stable. So I can't wait to see what 4.0.4 brings to us.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
Bhuvan why donot you port it
the porting based on nexus s...we still waiting for 4.0.4
Is it just me or somebody else there who preferes CM7 over ICS and feels CM7 is better, for the time being, than ICS, performancewise and customizationwise.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
CM7 is certainly more customizable for now, but if you're talking about performance and stability, both CM7 and CM9 are still not as good as some of the stock Froyo 2.2.1 roms, mainly due to free ram. With more free ram, the processor doesn't need to constantly close and reopen processes. Nonetheless, I prefer ICS over froyo and CM7 simply because of the many subtle yet important improvements, such as the keyboard and spellcheck, smoother game performance(eg: runs GTA3 with no lags), and the improved user interface.
ICS' only weakness in my point of view is the lousy multitasking, due to low ram on our galaxy s. I can't even open the browser and a simple game like angry birds at the same time without one of them being closed. Multitasking was slightly better on gingerbread and much better on Froyo.
CM7 in my opinion, is not faster than CM9, though it is currently more stable and has fewer bugs. But the huge community support that ICS has currently makes it better for me.
To check the multitasking I opened some apps and without killing them I checked the running processes. They are not shown there but in the cached running processes they are shown. Why?.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
mashray said:
To check the multitasking I opened some apps and without killing them I checked the running processes. They are not shown there but in the cached running processes they are shown. Why?.
Edit: cached backround processes
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
Cm9 is still in development phase... Cm7 is stable and being developed since long time. Once cm9 is fully developed we can compare them...
Sent from my MB525
ManDOT said:
Cm9 is still in development phase... Cm7 is stable and being developed since long time. Once cm9 is fully developed we can compare them...
Sent from my MB525
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, thats why wrote "for the time being" and definitely I'm not comparing them. I'm just asking the users opinion to choose.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
CM7 was nice, but right now I'm just lovin ICS.It looks and feels way better.
CM9 all the way. I'm just surprised how good it is for alpha. Better than 2.3 roms, imo.
dheeraj11 said:
CM7 was nice, but right now I'm just lovin ICS.It looks and feels way better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yep!!
yes
yes cm7 is much faster and stable than ics
Please remember that cm9 is still an ALPHA build.Sure it is not yet as custom able as cm7...but it will be. But back to the question tho , cm9 defo for me.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
And isn't the battery drain slower in CM7 than in ICS roms.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
mashray said:
And isn't the battery drain slower in CM7 than in ICS roms.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, it is... Battery backup of cm7 is better than cm9 that's why I'm back to cm7.
Sent from my MB525
I have never tested cm7. I think if you want to use a custom ROM, you should take ICS.
There isn't only cm9, you can also use something like AOKP (or BLUE LIGHTENING, a AOKP based ROM from BHuvan goyal), it is nearly bug free and very customizable!
If you like the stock ROMs, stay there!
Can Anybody make a Froyo Rom (CM6) or port one, for Example Froyo Pro, with OC Kernel
And with some ported things like new adreno libs?
Is it possible?
Sikorsky96 wants it too
Thanks for the answers
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
I'm pretty sure the Galaxy Ace originally shipped with Froyo, so I guess its theoretically possible, but the issue is, why would you? Downgrading the software on your phone doesn't make sense to me when GB, ICS (And hopefully soon JB) all run nicely on the Ace...
Obviously, if its possible but not in much demand, then a developer probably wont go out and do it, however, why don't you go and give it a go?
Oh man froyo is just perfect for gaming. Would love to see froyo running on my phone. And by the my phone already came with Ginger bread which I don't like so haven't had froyo on my ace ever. It would be awesome dud
To be honest froyo seems smoother to me than gingerbread. Always hated gingerbread. And ics wasn't made for ace in the first place. And its too buggy. It drained battery from 100% to 18 in less than an hour wtf.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
I wanted to make one , but I need to make a Froyo device config.....or rather a Froyo kernel .
Besides , the CM6 sources are heavily outdated , because their manifest still points to android.git.kernel.org
"Friends forever." - Ventus
Only battery life is good on froyo.Nothing else.games like angry birds lack,poor memory management,low api level which means less compatible apps.
Sikorsky96 said:
Oh man froyo is just perfect for gaming. Would love to see froyo running on my phone. And by the my phone already came with Ginger bread which I don't like so haven't had froyo on my ace ever. It would be awesome dud
To be honest froyo seems smoother to me than gingerbread. Always hated gingerbread. And ics wasn't made for ace in the first place. And its too buggy. It drained battery from 100% to 18 in less than an hour wtf.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In froyo, 3d games used to lag like hell. And the camera didnt have 480p option too!
In gb, everything is faster according to me.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk 2
Anyways, having cm6 would just add up to our forums flexibility you know having it wouldn't harm. And by the way I used to have a LG optimus gt540 I could run games without any lag on froyo but as soon as I installed Gingerbread I could no longer experience that smoothness so I had to go back to froyo. May be that's just that phone Gingerbread isn't that shi* now that I think about it
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Then can i request someone to make a cool froxo rom? (cm6)
It would be awesome with an OC Kernel and with some cm7 ported tweaks like adreno libs
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Mentafagyi said:
Then can i request someone to make a cool froxo rom? (cm6)
It would be awesome with an OC Kernel and with some cm7 ported tweaks like adreno libs
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
_________________________________________
Yep, add me to the list of people who would request for this.
Sikorsky96 said:
Oh man froyo is just perfect for gaming. Would love to see froyo running on my phone. And by the my phone already came with Ginger bread which I don't like so haven't had froyo on my ace ever. It would be awesome dud
To be honest froyo seems smoother to me than gingerbread. Always hated gingerbread. And ics wasn't made for ace in the first place. And its too buggy. It drained battery from 100% to 18 in less than an hour wtf.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess you never heard of Adrenaline Engine... Neither of any script
GB is much faster and better than Froyo.
And btw, ICS can be made for our device but samsung developers didn't even do anything to make it possible becauase, if they want us to get ICS, we need to buy one of their new phones...
Lol
Say no to Froyo.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
just for fun i downgraded from GB to froyo last month and i need to say it lagggggggggggggged like hell battery was not quite upto the mark to say goodbye to GB either.. with latest firmwares samsung did a fine job to make stock roms run faster.:silly:
Tovagulet said:
I guess you never heard of Adrenaline Engine... Neither of any script
GB is much faster and better than Froyo.
And btw, ICS can be made for our device but samsung developers didn't even do anything to make it possible becauase, if they want us to get ICS, we need to buy one of their new phones...
Lol
Say no to Froyo.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
_________________________________________
lol . It's just business, what do you expect. what would you do if you were them???
Anyways running ICS OR JB on our ace is absolutely possible but its like running win 7 or 8 on a pentium 2 pc with 128mb Graphics and 256mb ram .
and bro, I've had this phone for less than two month. since I bought it I have flashed nearly a billion roms and tweaks and patches and ...., they don't make a lot of difference, when you can't run better shoes won't do anything.