I'm loving my Nook Color with cm7, but...........The scroll stutter in the app drawer and inside menus is just horrible. Even at 1.2 ghz.
I'm thinking of looking for a new rom, anyone know which one is the smoothest/fastest??
Unless...That is one of you knows how to butter this puppy up! Haha
Thanks
I ran the latest CM7.2 KANG release for a while, I think it was one of the best that I have tried. I am using CM9 nightlies now though...if you want stability and speed, get the KANG CM7.2 from the Nook Color Developer Forum here. Make sure you do his V6 Supercharger suggestion, and anything else he suggests...
Keep in mind though, that for the money these are good machines...but consider them ghetto tablets at best
---------- Post added at 06:41 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:40 PM ----------
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1344873
That is the 7.2 rom I used before I decided to switch to nightly cm9 builds...
Definitely the new MiRaGe KANG build, with V6 Supercharger. Pretty much lag-free!
Sounds good to me, I will back up and flash the kang one. Well, I know it's only a 160 dollar device. But 1 ghz used to be very fast. The HTC Evo, it was fast to me. So I would hope the nook at 1.2 ghz would be at least close XD
I will give that rom a go! Thanks dudes
Holy CRAP! CM7.2 KANG is..........SO....MUCH....FASTER... Jeez! I had no idea the nook color would zoom like this! Thanks guys
Make sure to install V6 Supercharger if you haven't already. It gets even better!
Try Phiremod 7.2
This is a very good rom smooth and you don't need V6
I don't think you need V6 supercharger for MiRaGe either. I'd imagine any gains from it would be small. I'm going to try it out though and see what difference it does make.
Well, you don't need a custom ROM either! Give it a try.
I haven't tried any of the a kang stuff yet and have only been running and updating the regular CM7s.
The question I have is can I do a Kang install over CM 7.1 just like a regular update, i.e. copy zip file onto boot directory of SD, then boot into recovery mode?
I am using the triple boot microSD with CM7.2 MiRage on it. The V6 script does not seem to have any significant effect. The CM7.2 itself is pretty smooth.
Using the same setup on one of my cards. It did seem to increase scrolling speed for me in some apps. YMMV, of course. Agree about smoothness. This is also pretty close to the most stable setup I have now, which is a SD card devoted to a single boot devoted to mag666' latest kang.
I have used every ROM out there and can say, without a doubt, that CyanogenMod 7.2.0 RC1-encore-Kang is the fastest and best running ROM I have ever seen. Everything works as it should, great ROM.
A few tips I try to follow to keep my Nook Color running as fast as possible:
- Stick with CM7.2 (and not CM9).
- Use LauncherPro as your launcher.
- Overclock to 1200 MHz (you may want to undervolt as well to offset increased battery usage).
- Keep compcache disabled.
- Use 16bit transparency
- Disable surface dithering
- Disable 32bit framebuffer (Nook Tweaks)
I've used over a dozen launchers (ADX, ADX EX, GO Launcher, Zeam, Lightning, Regina, Trebuchet, Nova, etc), and I always go back to LauncherPro. Nothing else is as quick and smooth as it is.
Opera usually is the quickest browser (Mini or Mobile).
Instead of using a browser for everything, try to find a dedicated app for it (such as your favorite forum, social site, or news site).
BitingChaos said:
- Overclock to 1200 MHz (you may want to undervolt as well to offset increased battery usage).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I haven't a clue on what to set the voltages at and am hesitant because of all of the damage warnings I read about when messing with overclocked PC CPU voltages. I am assuming from Nook Tweaks, what are safe voltage ranges?
Crazy_Jew said:
I have used every ROM out there and can say, without a doubt, that CyanogenMod 7.2.0 RC1-encore-Kang is the fastest and best running ROM I have ever seen. Everything works as it should, great ROM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed
Moadim Le Simcha
Ok, I found the undervolt thread here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1443292&highlight=undervolt
CM 7.2 with the cpu at 1200 and the suggested voltage settings things seem to be working fine and am getting about a 8-10% battery drain per hour during websurfing and youtube viewing.
Locklear308 said:
Holy CRAP! CM7.2 KANG is..........SO....MUCH....FASTER... Jeez! I had no idea the nook color would zoom like this! Thanks guys
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hoping my impression will be as good as yours. Generally love the way I've got things setup on my older version of CM7 but it just feels notably slower than both our 1st gen iPad and even my Samsung Epic. Got an extra Sandisk card enroute and hope to try it out this weekend.
CM7 Mirage CM 7.2 - RC1 4/17/12 build
I'm EXTREMELY impressed with the performance of the new 4/17 release. I was debating on selling the nook color due to sluggish performance.
Now after installing the CM7 Mirage CM 7.2 - RC1 4/17/12 build, and following the instructions by BitingChaos listed below.. my nook color turned into a speed demon!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=24681708&postcount=14
"A few tips I try to follow to keep my Nook Color running as fast as possible:
- Stick with CM7.2 (and not CM9).
- Use LauncherPro as your launcher.
- Overclock to 1200 MHz (you may want to undervolt as well to offset increased battery usage).
- Keep compcache disabled.
- Use 16bit transparency
- Disable surface dithering
- Disable 32bit framebuffer (Nook Tweaks)
I've used over a dozen launchers (ADX, ADX EX, GO Launcher, Zeam, Lightning, Regina, Trebuchet, Nova, etc), and I always go back to LauncherPro. Nothing else is as quick and smooth as it is.
Opera usually is the quickest browser (Mini or Mobile).
Instead of using a browser for everything, try to find a dedicated app for it (such as your favorite forum, social site, or news site)."
Although quadrant scores aren't everything, I'll let the picture speak for itself
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Related
So I've been experimenting with CM7, the tablet tweaks and all that... but I was beginning to get fed up with it all, including my nigh-addiction to tweaking everything until it was almost-perfect, breaking it then starting all over. So I went back to my daily driver, good ol' Honeycomb V4 2nd Edition and threw Dalingrin's latest kernel on there, then popped off a quadrant just to see what was up...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
So, yeah. I'm ridiculously excited for whatever the day we get actual Honeycomb source code.
Viva la Nook Color.
I'm currently running the latest phiremod and I've been getting scores between1700 and 1900 so its not just Honeycomb getting those high scores. I was close to selling this and getting something else but this latest RC4 changed my mind.
I think quadrant just spits out random numbers. My nook breaks 2k and my phone hits lik 1.7k. I run them at the same time, watch my phone blow through all the processor and io tests before my nook, then watch it triple the fps of my nook on the graphics tests, but then the nook gets a higher score? Not to mention the hardware in my phone (except for the screen) is superior in every way to my nook. This is repeatable. Quadrant is not great imho.
But i still think my nook is boss :-D
See, a lot of people talk about how Uunreliable Quadrant is as a benchmark, but among all my Andrid experience ive found it to be really accurate at portraying how well my devices are running! At least between my Nook Color, Droid X and OG Droid.
I'm not saying that this is a ridiculus Quadrant, not in comparison to CM7 or a phone or anything... I just think 1700 is pretty damn good for what's only supposed to be a PREVIEW of honeycomb. I think Honeycomb is great; like i said, i use the Preview as my daily driver despite its inherent flaws. What I've managed to achieve merely says to me that someday, when we have the Honeycomb source, things are going to be beastly on this OS.
I like that idea.
I am amazed that people still use the Honeycomb SDK port. I mean its neat but I couldn't use it as a daily driver.
In terms of Quadrant, it has known issues with Gingerbread causing it to score lower than it should. In addition, the ease that you can spoof the score shows that it isn't the most reliable benchmark.
That said, I can't wait for Ice Cream source to drop.
so is the HC worth useing daily? I'm currently using froyo but if I can find something I can use this class 10 SD card on as a daily I'd switch.
ieAnd said:
So I've been experimenting with CM7, the tablet tweaks and all that... but I was beginning to get fed up with it all, including my nigh-addiction to tweaking everything until it was almost-perfect, breaking it then starting all over. So I went back to my daily driver, good ol' Honeycomb V4 2nd Edition and threw Dalingrin's latest kernel on there, then popped off a quadrant just to see what was up...
So, yeah. I'm ridiculously excited for whatever the day we get actual Honeycomb source code.
Viva la Nook Color.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
just installed Honeycomb V4 2nd Edition on my nook, what other updates or tings should I update if there are any out there?
Thanks
Yeah, I'm shocked at myself really! Especially considering how much of a perfectionist I am when it comes to GUI smoothness; I've almost switched to WP7 countless times purely because of how smooth Metro UI is.
I think one of the advantages of the Honeycomb Preview is that I CAN'T tweak it any further. It's static, therefore I can focus on actually using it rather than trying to tweak it all the time. Plus, when applications do actually run they run very well. And Honeycomb is beautiful even when jittery. Matias Duarte should win awards. I'm glad we took him from Palm.
As to what you should do? You should hunt down Dalingrin's 1100MHz OC kernel, and then that's about all you can do as far as I can tell. Enjoy the Honeycomb Preview.
I've been using Deeper-Blue's original SDCard HCv4 as my daily driver for about a month ... minimal bugs, works great!
Tried HC v4 2nd on SDCard instead of eMMC ... got a lot of force closes, esp. with the google browser.
Also tried CM7 RC4 with Mad-Murdock's tablet tweaks ... almost makes me want to switch, esp. with great video support ... but I like the tablet email and other HC features too much
Just got everything set up after running the manual nooter and did some linpack and quadrant tests to see if there is any improvement over the old Eclair based rom. Here they are for those who care.
Used set CPU to run in performance mode for these tests.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
The linpack mflops looks great. I get 11 on a tweaked out 2.6.29 @800mhz
The quadrant isn't amazing but I think its at least an improvement over the stock 2.6.29 kernel. I get 1800-1900 running my latest test kernel @ 800mhz on Gingerbread(quadrant typically scores less in Gingerbread than Froyo unlike other benchmarks)
Looks like 2.6.32 has some potential.
Holy crap....
This is going to be great once we get kernel source and can undervolt/overlcock this sucka
Performance in general is pretty impressive. I dont know how they managed but at 800MHZ it feels just as smooth as CM7 at 1100. I am REALLY looking forward to getting this overclocked.
Flash is smoother for me in 1.2 than its ever been with any rom regardless of clock speed.
notinterested said:
Performance in general is pretty impressive. I dont know how they managed but at 800MHZ it feels just as smooth as CM7 at 1100. I am REALLY looking forward to getting this overclocked.
Flash is smoother for me in 1.2 than its ever been with any rom regardless of clock speed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is a post somewhere else that includes an APK for the 1.2 Flash so that CM7 users can replace their current install. Apparently it was optimized specifically for the Nook Color and runs better than the Falsh that's available on the market.
dsf3g said:
There is a post somewhere else that includes an APK for the 1.2 Flash so that CM7 users can replace their current install. Apparently it was optimized specifically for the Nook Color and runs better than the Falsh that's available on the market.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My understanding is that it's only true for youtube for some reason, but not for other stuff. I think dal explained it in some thread.
s52m3 said:
My understanding is that it's only true for youtube for some reason, but not for other stuff. I think dal explained it in some thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is true for any site that is optimized for flash on mobile. Youtube is so it is easy to use as an example. However any site can be optimised, it is just a matter of if it is or not. Not sure where i read it either maybe the cm7 user thread?
Masterface7 said:
It is true for any site that is optimized for flash on mobile. Youtube is so it is easy to use as an example. However any site can be optimised, it is just a matter of if it is or not. Not sure where i read it either maybe the cm7 user thread?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is what I've been saying. Unfortunately, the flash B&N uses is worse on videos that are not optimized for mobile. But it performs great on those videos that are for mobile. "Mobile" videos only have 40% CPU usage @ 600mhz. Thats pretty impressive for flash, just wish it applied to all videos.
dalingrin said:
This is what I've been saying. Unfortunately, the flash B&N uses is worse on videos that are not optimized for mobile. But it performs great on those videos that are for mobile. "Mobile" videos only have 40% CPU usage @ 600mhz. Thats pretty impressive for flash, just wish it applied to all videos.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have found the exact opposite to be true. I go to a site that has videos not optimized for mobile and on CM7 they are simply not watchable. With the 1.2 flash its not perfect but certainly better than it is in CM7. Which is surprising because when im on CM7 i run 1100MHZ compared to the 800 with the 1.2 flash.
Anyone else have linpack scores on 1.2 they can post?
Linpack score sux
davidukfl said:
Just got everything set up after running the manual nooter and did some linpack and quadrant tests to see if there is any improvement over the old Eclair based rom. Here they are for those who care.
Used set CPU to run in performance mode for these tests.
LINKPACK
score is 6.056 mflops, in 13.84 seconds, normal resolution 5.68, set cpu 925 mhz max/min running cyanogen 7.0.3 will all processes closed.
QUADRANT STANDARD
score is avg roughly 900 and i'm getting anywhere from 3 to 38 fps.
i've owned n1, m.droid, evo and now dinc that all ran cyanogen and never saw such low scores. i don't know if this nook color is just a little premature or that i'm putting too much emphasis on these scores but i believe there's a 2 ghz tablet around the corner with more horsepower. what do you think?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why did you bump this just to scatter crap?
Running CM7 and OC, I'm hitting quad scores of 2400-3000
Try messing with the NC more before you write it off.
I also agree...
If you are getting scores that low, then something is wrong, wrong, wrong.
I am operating on the CM 7.0.3 and have the thing OC'd at 1300.
I get consistent scores in the 2500 - 2900 range...
Lego
Yeah, i'm back, and this time i'm bringing Immortality-CM with me. Better performance, and maybe better battery life than its little froyo brother. As always:
I (NOR TEAM WHISKEY) WILL NOT BE HELD RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY DAMAGE CAUSED TO YOUR PHONE BEFORE, DURING, OR AFTER FLASHING THIS. PLEASE READ ALL NOTES AND WARNINGS, FOLLOW DIRECTIONS, MAKE A NANDROID, HAVE ODIN READY, AND FLASH AT YOUR OWN RISK!!!
Features:
Voodoo Sound v10
Voodoo Color
Safely boots to 1ghz
OCable to 1.4ghz
User configurable UV
BFQ scheduler(set to default)
Smartass governor option available
Full sound dock support
LIPPOL94's kernel cleaning script integrated into flash package
SetCPU's 400/100 screen off profile safe to use, but not recommended.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
NOTES:
1. The cleaning script is integrated into the flash package, so it will clean before the kernel actually flashes, once its done and you reboot, it will take a little while longer to reboot since the dalvik-cache is wiped.
2. It is safe to use a screen off profile with 400/100 setting, but i do not recommend it.
3. The splash screen is the same skull from my froyo kernel, but it has "CM" on it. If you dont like skulls or my splash in general, plz use another kernel. And NO, i won't change or make another version of it, so plz don't ask.
4. My beta tester, Skitz, has reported low quad scores with this. If you are a person concerned with benchmark scores, then this isnt for you. Quads don't make the kernel, the performance does.
5. I am running OMFGB so i know this will work on that and regular CM7, i hear that CM7 kernels also work on MIUI, but i have not personally tested it on it.
Known issues:
1. May hang on kernel splash for a while, if it exceeds more than 3 mins, pull battery and put it back in and boot normally.
2. You may have to re-enter Gmail credentials, i think this is because of the cleaning script, but i'll look into fixing it.
All my kernels will be hosted from Google Code, so you can download here
Credits:
My beautiful fiance
drhonk
ttabbal
Krylon360
ECOTOX
TeamHacksung
CyanogenMOD
supercurio
Skitz
romman
Lippol94
coolbho3k
xan
Anyone else i forgot, let me know.
reserved for me
Yes, yes, but does it run on the HP Touchpad?
LOL, anyway... more kernel choices are always good. Thanks for properly sharing the source as well, if someone really wants to change the boot logo, that's a good way.
lotherius said:
Yes, yes, but does it run on the HP Touchpad?
LOL, anyway... more kernel choices are always good. Thanks for properly sharing the source as well, if someone really wants to change the boot logo, that's a good way.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the source on my google code page is for the froyo version of Immortality, if anyone wants the source of the CM version i'll get it to them
I am about to throw this on miui le4 ill let you know if i run into problems. Thanks!
wow, was wondering if there would be one for cm7......thanks bro for this
Thanks for this kernel!
Can anyone explain why in Gingerbread, our phones only charge up to 4180's mvs and not 4240's as in froyo? I feel like my battery is not getting fully charged.... Is that a kernel thing?
anybody who can tell me what is OMFGB?
thanks
啊喔鹅咦呜鱼 said:
anybody who can tell me what is OMFGB?
thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=omfgb
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
啊喔鹅咦呜鱼 said:
anybody who can tell me what is OMFGB?
thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its romann's new AOSP project, its on rootzwiki:
http://rootzwiki.com/showthread.php?3745-AOSP-Custom-Gingerbread-OMFGB-1.3.1-Vibrant-Nightlies&
I didn't pay attention to rootzwiki for a long time.
so...
stevedrz said:
Can anyone explain why in Gingerbread, our phones only charge up to 4180's mvs and not 4240's as in froyo? I feel like my battery is not getting fully charged.... Is that a kernel thing?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Might be this issue: http://existz.darkirc.info/git/?p=k...ff;h=140ae0b9df10ea7259586ddba28b599c7339fc28
(so see if it is in the TalonMTD 0.0.3 release)
IDisposable said:
Might be this issue: http://existz.darkirc.info/git/?p=k...ff;h=140ae0b9df10ea7259586ddba28b599c7339fc28
(so see if it is in the TalonMTD 0.0.3 release)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No dice, same as all other gb kernels. it went as high as 4186 then dropped down a few mv, and charging completed. In froyo I'd get to 4240's.
Could it just be the way the mv is measured in froyo vs gingerbread, or maybe the calculation against it?
What does the Max 8998 do in the source code?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Hi Mr. Apocalypse,
I'm on MIUI and I just flashed your kernel. Here's to hoping I do get better battery life It's the only downside I see with using MIUI but it's just simply a great ROM that I don't mind the battery that much anymore... but better battery life would be awesome
Thanks
cezzarmicu said:
Hi Mr. Apocalypse,
I'm on MIUI and I just flashed your kernel. Here's to hoping I do get better battery life It's the only downside I see with using MIUI but it's just simply a great ROM that I don't mind the battery that much anymore... but better battery life would be awesome
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know how good the battery will be on MIUI, but i'm on OMFGB and the battery is excellent
Mr. Apocalypse said:
I don't know how good the battery will be on MIUI, but i'm on OMFGB and the battery is excellent
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
By excellent, on the stock battery how many hours, with what kins of use?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
I just switched over to immortality from glitch v12. So far, I am really impressed. Everything runs very smoothly and without any real lagging.
There is one thing however that is really really odd....when playing videos, when the video finishes buffering and is about to begin playing, I get the, "cannot play ths video" message, and it closes. As far as I know, this shouldn't have anything to do with your kernel...but videos worked fine before flashing over to immortality...so I'm stumped, any ideas?
Either way, great work. Top notch job, as always!
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Wow seems great anyone use this with biffmod?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
PhilUSAF21 said:
Wow seems great anyone use this with biffmod?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think Biffmod is a CM7 variant, so it should work.
Hello guys!
First post here and this is the first time I overclock my P990!
I'm currently using CM7 Nightly 156 + Vorkernel 2.6.32.41 with Ginger 2.3.5.
My best Score with quadrant was 3949 points @1408Mhz
Equinox_br said:
Hello guys!
First post here and this is the first time I overclock my P990!
I'm currently using CM7 Nightly 156 + Vorkernel 2.6.32.41 with Ginger 2.3.5.
My best Score with quadrant was 3949 points @1408Mhz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Before something changed I was able to get 3400 with 1Ghz and vorkkernel
So, this means that my score is bad?
What can I do to make it better?
Stock phone I was scoring like 2700, Volkernel 1Ghz like 2900 and now at 1.4Ghz with 3900.
Stock Galaxy S II scores something like 3200 if I remember.
Maybe you were running 1.1.6 version of Quadrant no?
that just score, and in benchmark, you will not see difference between 3000 and 3400 when you use it. the best combination is, when you feel a very big woow.
i got that feel with latest GO Launcher EX, and stock v10D with latest neoblaze [email protected] ext4, i removed cardock or what, and now i see a very very big difference with a very good standby time.
very fast scrolls in browser, gallery, and settings and launcher, install apps 5x faster, take shot 2x faster with camera, and the speed in browser is extremly fast. it boots much faster, you can try init.d tweaks for memory management.
and now... you can spend your time with make your homescreen, or skin nicer and nicer, and then share with us
With topogigi v1.7, OC at 1,4GHz got 4110 in quadrant!
At 1GHz was 3231
Edit with v1.9 +SP1 & HP kernel RC1 @1,4GHz "4416"
Custom kernels support "epeen enlargment".
Thats a different aproach to how sql database writes which doesnt make difference in speed in real use but makes a huge diference in benchmarks.
Where you see "sql hack" avoid it. No real advantage and it could be a potentcial data loss.
So there is a big part of the change
Wow...Reading this I feel like I still have to learn a lot about Android developments! hehe
In general I'm very satisfied with my phone, its fast, stable, never had an error.
I'll see if I can touch the 4000 score without increase processor speed, any tip?
I'm currently using CM7 Nightly 156 + Vorkernel 2.6.32.41 with Ginger 2.3.5.
Edit:
Guys, my 3g network was bad and I tried to restart my phone, when initializing he froze on LG logo (second one). I tried to replace the Kernel and had no success, so I had to reinstall CM7!! And the phone worked....I think that the problem was a Vorkernel update that I made by a program called Vorkernel update inside the OS!
Now I'm using the stock kernel from CM7 till get home at least. I ran Quadrant again and got 3143 point @1.0Ghz! That is a lot! hehe
Leaked GB 2.3.4
1.4ghz NeoBlaze ROM
Quadrant 1.1.7
2760 score. My phone is broken
Ah.. 3182 now, overclocking program wasn't working!
3658 run two...
3710 run 3.. nice.
Restored phone, went to Topogigi 1.9, 1.4ghz still, now getting around 4600... much better.
Topogigi 1.8 sp1
1,4Ghz
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Topogigi's 1.9...
justclimb said:
Topogigi's 1.9...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unable to download..:-( :-(
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA App
4260 with Topogigi's 1.9 and 1.4Ghz oc daemon!
indyjones83 said:
4260 with Topogigi's 1.9 and 1.4Ghz oc daemon!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
4586 for me ;-)
2541 At stock looks like a bad score to me :/
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA App
Striatum_bdr said:
4586 for me ;-)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While we're having a pissing contest...
Mungulz said:
While we're having a pissing contest...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeap, in Topogigi's thread a guy showed a nearly 5000 screenshot with some tweaks of his own..
It's probably good to remind that tweaking a ROM to have better scores in benchmarks doesn't mean a better user experience in practical use.
When you know which tests are made by the benchmark app, you can optimize the dedicated part of code in ROM to have better results, it dosn't mean the entire ROM will be snappier. The most famous is sqlite optimizations as all benchmarks use sqlite tests...
So it can give a good idea but it's not the Holy Bible...
2369 on stock rom for me. I wonder if my phone is not performing like it should. No custom kernels.
Soulj4h said:
2369 on stock rom for me. I wonder if my phone is not performing like it should. No custom kernels.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine on stock 2350-2600
So dont worry
Sent from my LG-P990 using XDA App
I'm thinking if I should install the neoblaze kernel on stock
You should, if you have spare batteries
Sent from my LG-P990 using Tapatalk
Hi guys, was wondering about what makes you decide to leave stock and stick to cm, or why you're staying in stock rather than cm10.1?
I've been thinking which ROM to go for, thinking about the cons and pros for each..
for stock, great kernel support from doomlord, better cam( i think ? ), more mods available( better sound from zeroinfinity).
for cm10.1, loads of customization, super smooth( carbon rom for now ).
What additional feature else to add?
Please list down what ROM you're using + the reason why you're sticking with ( stock / cm10.1 ) ? Would like to see different users' opinion.
If u want to preserve warranty, go for stock
If you want performance and daily updates , go for cm 10.1
If you wanna customise your device to d core, go for miui v5.
Aosp, paranoid android and pacman roms are also worth it
Sent from my C6602 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
stock - I find cm/aosp roms are ugly and lack features available
Richy99 said:
stock - I find cm/aosp roms are ugly and lack features available
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
xIceCream said:
Hi guys, was wondering about what makes you decide to leave stock and stick to cm, or why you're staying in stock rather than cm10.1?
I've been thinking which ROM to go for, thinking about the cons and pros for each..
for stock, great kernel support from doomlord, better cam( i think ? ), more mods available( better sound from zeroinfinity).
for cm10.1, loads of customization, super smooth( carbon rom for now ).
What additional feature else to add?
Please list down what ROM you're using + the reason why you're sticking with ( stock / cm10.1 ) ? Would like to see different users' opinion.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SEARCH
SEARCH
SEARCH
Sent via my Nexus7 | WiFi.32GB
pjgowtham said:
If you want performance and daily updates , go for cm 10.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually, there is a noticeable drop in performance while running CM10.1 vs stock. Whether this is related to the build I'm running being a debug build vs release/optimised or if there's a more efficient graphics driver in stock ROMs I don't know, but I get 5600 in Quadrant running CM10.1 vs roughly 7800 in stock. Pretty large difference.
The most likely reason for this is what I mentioned above, that a debug build is not at all as optimised (as that takes a lot more time for compilation) as stable builds. But still worth mentioning as one is most likely to be running userdebug nightlies at this stage. If this is the case then we will most likely see improved results when the CM10.1 stable gets the new FXP kernel that's been pushed to the nightly builds.
DreadPirateDan said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
good now run along, the cm roms I have used previously lack the fm radio player, hdmi out just to name 2 things missing
Richy99 said:
good now run along, the cm roms I have used previously lack the fm radio player, hdmi out just to name 2 things missing
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Both are in CM10.1 for XZ...
Rekoil said:
Actually, there is a noticeable drop in performance while running CM10.1 vs stock. Whether this is related to the build I'm running being a debug build vs release/optimised or if there's a more efficient graphics driver in stock ROMs I don't know, but I get 5600 in Quadrant running CM10.1 vs roughly 7800 in stock. Pretty large difference.
The most likely reason for this is what I mentioned above, that a debug build is not at all as optimised (as that takes a lot more time for compilation) as stable builds. But still worth mentioning as one is most likely to be running userdebug nightlies at this stage. If this is the case then we will most likely see improved results when the CM10.1 stable gets the new FXP kernel that's been pushed to the nightly builds.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will find the next person who uses quadrant as a form of measurement for performance.
Or any benchmarking tool
Benchmarks aside, I have been testing gaming on the latest cm nightly. Nova and including modern combat 4 runs smoothly. Don't put your
hopes only on benchmarks.
Rchard said:
Benchmarks aside, I have been testing gaming on the latest cm nightly. Nova and including modern combat 4 runs smoothly. Don't put your
hopes only on benchmarks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Was about to type in my last post that I wasn't complaining about the performance, not at all, because it is stellar. Just saying that I've seen better performance on Sony ROMs.
Rekoil said:
Was about to type in my last post that I wasn't complaining about the performance, not at all, because it is stellar. Just saying that I've seen better performance on Sony ROMs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Never said u r complaining. This just came from my point of view. But I agree that on Sonys ROM benchmarks r better. Its difficult to ditch cm, I have always liked aosp but might end up testing Sony's.
Sent from my C6603 using xda app-developers app
How about this....I can send pictures via MMS on Stock Sony firmware no issues (APN is the same as what I use for CM10.1) but I cannot send anything with CM10.1....
I would much prefer to use CM10.1 as well but unless I can find a fix (and yes, I do know how to search )