So, what are the differences between these ROM types? Any particular advantages to either of them?
Sent from my superior GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
Zamboney said:
So, what are the differences between these ROM types? Any particular advantages to either of them?
Sent from my superior GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice article by a friend-
http://knowmydroid.com/blog/what-is-aokp-rom-how-is-it-different-from-cm9
Sounds like they are mostly cosmetical, although choice is good of course. Hopefully we'll have both!
Sent from my superior GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
May the KANG be with you guys!
^_^
AOSP means android open source project.. Any rom that derivates from that it's an AOSP rom...
AOKP team named their rom that way implying that they are "kanging" AOSP like many people kangs cm7/9/10
Kang means cook a rom based on other people's work so in a way every rom its a "kang" from AOSP, even TW roms as TW its just a "skin" but under the hood its just plain and simple Android.
If a developer doesn't modify the AOSP code they would be releasing Google's roms Wich its stock Android.
But there's differences between cooking and developing and that's why you see 2 sections in development the original Wich should be developers whom modify and support roms straight from AOSP being able of actually fix bugs and issues and the regular development Wich its people that uses kitchens and scrips to create roms.. No actually developing code..
So at the end AOKP its a rom based on AOSP, as cm10 and every single rom that derivates from AOSP, go and check development section in galaxy nexus forum and you will see what's development.. There's no less than 100 different rom's all coded from AOSP.. AOSP is the mother of every rom that exist
Tapatalking on my n7000
msedek said:
AOSP means android open source project.. Any rom that derivates from that it's an AOSP rom...
AOKP team named their rom that way implying that they are "kanging" AOSP like many people kangs cm7/9/10
Kang means cook a rom based on other people's work so in a way every rom its a "kang" from AOSP, even TW roms as TW its just a "skin" but under the hood its just plain and simple Android.
If a developer doesn't modify the AOSP code they would be releasing Google's roms Wich its stock Android.
But there's differences between cooking and developing and that's why you see 2 sections in development the original Wich should be developers whom modify and support roms straight from AOSP being able of actually fix bugs and issues and the regular development Wich its people that uses kitchens and scrips to create roms.. No actually developing code..
So at the end AOKP its a rom based on AOSP, as cm10 and every single rom that derivates from AOSP, go and check development section in galaxy nexus forum and you will see what's development.. There's no less than 100 different rom's all coded from AOSP.. AOSP is the mother of every rom that exist
Tapatalking on my n7000
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks a lot, that was really helpful!
doctorgallo said:
Thanks a lot, that was really helpful!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was reading different threads and found this one. Great explanation! Why is it that some features like wi-fi calling dont work on aosp?
Wipef
tytngasman said:
I was reading different threads and found this one. Great explanation! Why is it that some features like wi-fi calling dont work on aosp?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The AOSP roms are often unofficial and are made by our cool developers, so there are some features that don't work. But those are usually fixed sooner or later
Skickat från min HTC One via Tapatalk 2
Read this thread too, Will help
http://androidforums.com/triumph-all-things-root/541600-aokp-vs-aosp.html
dasunh said:
Read this thread too, Will help
http://androidforums.com/triumph-all-things-root/541600-aokp-vs-aosp.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanx
Skickat från min HTC One via Tapatalk 2
Related
Closing thread down done with aokp.
Close thread please.
No fix's close thread.
Great!!!!! Downloading..
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA
You sure are on top of your game mate!
Thanks alot for your contribution to this community
YAYYY!! Jamie brings the awesome AOKP to note. with the latest builds, brilliant bro! thank you soo much!
I just wanted to flash your "CodenameAndroid"-ROM but now I'm seeing this ROM. So what's the difference between these two?
Igor02 said:
I just wanted to flash your "CodenameAndroid"-ROM but now I'm seeing this ROM. So what's the difference between these two?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
pretty much settings/user preferences/other things.
CNA has some things, AOKP has some things, they both have some things
and im trying to make CNA more tablet mode orientated since AOKP has more ability to switch between phone/tablet modes easier
Does this have all the bugs which the AOSP ROM has?
Sent from my Galaxy S!
download is VERY slow!!!!!!!!
aakaashjois said:
Does this have all the bugs which the AOSP ROM has?
Sent from my Galaxy S!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
*facepalm* way to make yourself look stupid on page 1 of the thread
please go back to the top of the OP and read the big read writing.
then read down a bit to where it says BUGS.
goofy584 said:
download is VERY slow!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its a godaddy server, its been good to me sofar
just clicked download, its fairly slow :\
im waiting on someone for a second host so i can have 2 different links for the roms.
Yeah Im downloading right. I just downloaded your CNA but this had to come out. Guess i might as well test both of them.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
what's the different with ics stunner B3
ericlovesure said:
what's the different with ics stunner B3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ICS stunner is based on ICS Euphoria which is based on features from AOKP and CM9. You will have euphoria controls which are a mix of controls from Both
AOKP is the open kang project which is separate from cm9, with its own set of controls and features
Highly recommend you to check both roms out! Fabulous roms!
Super slow download :-(
sent from my gnote full of awesomeness
Can this be used in phone mode 320 DPI without soft keys?
aakaashjois said:
I have a Note too. I am just using my Galaxy S now. There are quite a few AOSP Roms for N7000. I didnt know which rom's bugs he meant when he said "Anything from AOSP"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bugs on x AOSP will be on y AOSP xD This is same base...
But there are a lot of 4.0 roms: AOSP, AOKP or other, and i think many users are lost, because more explications and differencies must be listing between these roms...
God damn pls stops these noob bashing.
It is incredibly. Many of you may not remember that they were sometimes noobs.
Congrats @ Jamie
aakaashjois said:
I have a Note too. I am just using my Galaxy S now. There are quite a few AOSP Roms for N7000. I didnt know which rom's bugs he meant when he said "Anything from AOSP"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No worries mate. Its all good, you are always good to ask questions if they confuse you The common bugs which all aosp and aokp roms share are the same because they are all based on Imilkas aosp v6 rom.
But I would recommend you to see the OP with the list of bugs mentioned there too and the aosp bug list as well.
And I recommend you trying the few roms for note, to see which one suits you according to your preference. cheers!
Paraniod Roms?
Quick question ppl, im prbly going to get hammered for this lol.
What is the difference between all the paranoid roms on the note? I see like 3 different ones
Cheeers for your help!
Coder-R said:
Paraniod Roms?
Quick question ppl, im prbly going to get hammered for this lol.
What is the difference between all the paranoid roms on the note? I see like 3 different ones
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1373728
There doesn't exist any paranIOd ROM. Ppl if u wd wrt prprly. WD b hily apprctd. 0.02$
Paranoid on Belly Jean // HydraCore 3.1
this is the second thread for this question :what:
all u need to know is 0.5 for ICS PA. 2.1 for Jelly Bean PA.
if you wanted tried and tested reliability, go for the 0.5, bleeding edge at the cost of memory leakage, 2.1
theres one more, the Utaka PA release, built from source rather than ported from a different device. Can't comment on this, not used it yet
this can all be discovered by simply reading the first page of the thread, a task achieved in less time than opening two threads
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda app-developers app
Written pretty much covered it.
1. PA v0.5 by imilka is based on ICS and is quite stable
2. PA 2.1 also by imilka is based on JB and isn't as stable as 1.
Both of these are ports from a different device.
3. PA 2.1 by Utacka is based on JB and isn't as stable as 1.
This port is based off of the official Paranoid Rom for the Galaxy Note.
Feel free to correct me if I got anything wrong.
little-vince said:
Written pretty much covered it.
1. PA v0.5 by imilka is based on ICS and is quite stable
2. PA 2.1 also by imilka is based on JB and isn't as stable as 1.
Both of these are ports from a different device.
3. PA 2.1 by Utacka is based on JB and isn't as stable as 1.
This port is based off of the official Paranoid Rom for the Galaxy Note.
Feel free to correct me if I got anything wrong.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine is not based of the official n7000 one, in fact nothing is ported from the official n7000 one, its the first PA rom built from source.
Skickat från min GT-N7000 via Tapatalk 2
So, are there differences between imilka's and Utacka's JB PA in terms of features/functions that work or don't work? (I'm guessing they would be the same since they're both CM10 based, but I'm not sure, hence the question)
Or, is the difference just in terms of optimisations/tweaks/battery life/look etc.?
Thanks,
Rich
richlum said:
So, are there differences between imilka's and Utacka's JB PA in terms of features/functions that work or don't work? (I'm guessing they would be the same since they're both CM10 based, but I'm not sure, hence the question)
Or, is the difference just in terms of optimisations/tweaks/battery life/look etc.?
Thanks,
Rich
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
imilkas latest pa is ported to official preview #5 so it do not include latest cm merges since then basicly. Mine is straight from source and I build mine everynight and always include the latest. Also next nightly will include new lib drivers from note 2 JB and make it more buttery, look at my thread in few hours. stay tuned.
Skickat från min GT-N7000 via Tapatalk 2
Just wondering why we have 2 different development forums? Seems they both have similar content but I have to go from one to the other and I'm not sure there's any reason for having both? Anyone else think this is annoying?
We have 2 one for AOSP based Roms and one for touch wiz roms. The one for touchwiz is Roms that are based on the phones original firmware. The other are based on stock android.
Sent from my SPH-L720 using xda premium
Read the stickies in each one. It explains it well.
killakarl said:
We have 2 one for AOSP based Roms and one for touch wiz roms. The one for touchwiz is Roms that are based on the phones original firmware. The other are based on stock android.
Sent from my SPH-L720 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not true. Read the stickies. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2257061
Sent from my Sprint Galaxy S4 using Tapatalk 2
Hmm now I feel dumb...been here forever and this is the first time I've seen those touchwiz and aosp separated in different forums. Thanks for letting me know!
killakarl said:
We have 2 one for AOSP based Roms and one for touch wiz roms. The one for touchwiz is Roms that are based on the phones original firmware. The other are based on stock android.
Sent from my SPH-L720 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NO this is very wrong! Read the sticky in Original development. Only ROMs created from ground up like CM and AOKP are original. Any clone or cherry picked ROM does not belong in Original Development.
kennyglass123 said:
NO this is very wrong! Read the sticky in Original development. Only ROMs created from ground up like CM and AOKP are original. Any clone or cherry picked ROM does not belong in Original Development.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So what your saying is we have a second development forum for 2 roms. All other AOSP roms are clones of them aren't they?
cruise350 said:
So what your saying is we have a second development forum for 2 roms. All other AOSP roms are clones of them aren't they?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Also for kernels, ROMs with custom kernels, ROMs built from the ground up. Definitey not for someone who just follows CM's instructions on how to build from their source and they change one thing. That is not original. The huge misconception that one is for TW makes no sense on Google devices...then nothing should go in Android Development? The Original Development section was created to reward developers and teams who have created or modified 100's of lines of code and put a lot of original work into their release.
So I want to slide to AOSP ROM already.. but the list is too long and my time is too short..
Could any one please report and share some of your experience with the AOSP ROMs?
Which is the most stable? and is it ready for daily use?
Compare it to the stock..
I don't care about features / android version or anything else.. just AOSP and most stable..
Your help would be extra appreciated.
Jordan.
Pabx is the only aosp. The others are based on Cm.
It's also incredibly stable & definitely recommended
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk 4
fards said:
Pabx is the only aosp. The others are based on Cm.
It's also incredibly stable & definitely recommended
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for that recommending!
Apologies for confusing I guess I can't tell the difference between AOSP and CM (and others if there are more..)
I meant a clean version of the Android with nothing related to Sony.. no UI, no touchwiz and no sense..
Clean like the nexus..
With the quick settings on the notification bar..
Any kinds of those..
Hope thats more clear..
fards said:
Pabx is the only aosp. The others are based on Cm.
It's also incredibly stable & definitely recommended
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
would you say CM and Pabx AOSP are around the same smoothness?
Personally I prefer the work that pabx has done on his aosp kernel, than what free xperia have done with CM one.
CM is nice for all the extra bits, but aosp is stripped back and basic and a chunk more responsive. I put a lightly modified version of his kernel in his thread that allows undervolting, so it's also fairly decent battery wise.
Best to try all the major ones out and see which you prefer.
FWIW sonys stock roms (Once you take out the usual extra bloat apps) are pretty close to aosp roms, they don't tend to change massive amounts from the qualcomm code.
Out of the major oems I'd say they run closest to the true android experience.
Like fards I'd recommend Pabx 4.3 ROM though it is quite bone stock AOSP. A stable CM ROM that is still quite light would be CyanX 7.0. I use it personally as my daily driver. Pretty stable and fast with good battery.
Sent from my C6603 using Tapatalk 4
Member since 2011 and you still don't understand "No questions in General section"???
Thank you all for recommending..
And Rashkae, sorry if it ain't in the right place, I found it more suitable to General as a discussion and not as "How do I..." question..
The forum didn't have any discuss for ROMs and opinions of each so I thought why not raise it up myself..
mcjordan92 said:
So I want to slide to AOSP ROM already.. but the list is too long and my time is too short..
Could any one please report and share some of your experience with the AOSP ROMs?
Which is the most stable? and is it ready for daily use?
Compare it to the stock..
I don't care about features / android version or anything else.. just AOSP and most stable..
Your help would be extra appreciated.
Jordan.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I love AOSP and paired with Gravity Box(xposed) it gets all the extra bits of CM.
But i still give CM based ROMs an upper hand due to features like per app dpi, PA pie, general all in one packaging and still maintaining performance.
Here are a few ROMs I like
Carbon - Loads of features, extremely fast and battery friendly(except for the latest version)
Mokee - Smooth, all usefull features.
CyanX - Stable and basic CM features and a custom kernel.
PAC - Has all the features u could think of, though a bit buggy.
Jelly bam- True all in one ROM just like PAC
Commotio/Vanir - The best ROM i've tried till now, Sooo fast, stable and great devs
A few more that I've tried : Asylum , CM 10.2 , AOKP, etc ( select yuga in device)
YouTube these ROM (check Nexus 4 videos) before you try them it has the same features irrespective of the device.
Wow thats like a database for XZ
That's extremely helpful! Thank you so much
Sent from my Xperia Z.
This is question for developers and porters.Why no one is porting new builds of liquidsmooth rom since it is for me best rom for our phone.I am still flashing old demetris build...
dimi89 said:
This is question for developers and porters.Why no one is porting new builds of liquidsmooth rom since it is for me best rom for our phone.I am still flashing old demetris build...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry to ask for this, I know I should install and test for myself the rom,
But I just would like to know how is the battery life on this rom?
What about the power button? Does it work properly? Because I had this issue on android 4.3 based rom's.
And the camera? Clear images and sharper?
Thanks in advance!
Best Regards from Brazil
By the way, in my opinion android 4.2.2 is the most stable atm
Rafael Cardoso said:
Sorry to ask for this, I know I should install and test for myself the rom,
But I just would like to know how is the battery life on this rom?
What about the power button? Does it work properly? Because I had this issue on android 4.3 based rom's.
And the camera? Clear images and sharper?
Thanks in advance!
Best Regards from Brazil
By the way, in my opinion android 4.2.2 is the most stable atm
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Build that we currently have ported by Demetris is 4.2.2 and for me it is the best custom rom out there.Camera and battery are great even with stock app and stock kernel.Alwayse switching between MIUI and LiquidSmooth.Flash it and test is for couple of days yourself and see if you are satisfied.
Greetings from Serbia
what bugs does it have?
Sent from my AOSP 4.3 Xperia S via Tapatalk
Ben36 said:
what bugs does it have?
Sent from my AOSP 4.3 Xperia S via Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Test it or read the last few posts of the rom thread.
Not that hard, is it?
Sent from my 4X HD via XDA Premium
it's also not hard for the devs to just put them in the OP but they all seem scared to admit there are bugs on this forum
Sent from my AOSP 4.3 Xperia S via Tapatalk
dimi89 said:
Build that we currently have ported by Demetris is 4.2.2 and for me it is the best custom rom out there.Camera and battery are great even with stock app and stock kernel.Alwayse switching between MIUI and LiquidSmooth.Flash it and test is for couple of days yourself and see if you are satisfied.
Greetings from Serbia
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@dimi89 Dimi! Thank you again! You have already answered me on another post, and again here, with the same education and niceness
Thanks, I flashed LiquidSmooth rom and until this moment, no problems at all.. everything ok with iodak kernel v8 10.1..
Greetings from Brazil
Ben36 said:
it's also not hard for the devs to just put them in the OP but they all seem scared to admit there are bugs on this forum
Sent from my AOSP 4.3 Xperia S via Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's even easier for YOU to test it yourself. Backup your current setup and flash it. Most of the mentioned bugs aren't even for everybody and it is actually quite hard for the devs to make a full list of bugs which occur for every single user.
If you don't agree with that it's your fault. The devs are doing an awesome job here and they do it because they want to.
Sent from my 4X HD via XDA Premium
In my honest opinion, bugs should be on the OP if they are known bugs. It's a matter of structure and information. But that's just me
From what I understood, carbon is a "fork" from Liquid and I think it's a compilation from source and not a port, right? If so, is it possible to compile Liquid from source as well ?
This question is for someone who knows or a developer
MidnightDevil said:
In my honest opinion, bugs should be on the OP if they are known bugs. It's a matter of structure and information. But that's just me
From what I understood, carbon is a "fork" from Liquid and I think it's a compilation from source and not a port, right? If so, is it possible to compile Liquid from source as well ?
This question is for someone who knows or a developer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They stated that Carbon rom doesnt have anything to do with liquid team.Also if you look at title on older liquid builds by demetris you will see it says "Official" so i think it is possible to compile from source.Asked demetris long time ago about liquid future for our phone but still no answer.
dimi89 said:
They stated that Carbon rom doesnt have anything to do with liquid team.Also if you look at title on older liquid builds by demetris you will see it says "Official" so i think it is possible to compile from source.Asked demetris long time ago about liquid future for our phone but still no answer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, they stated the following:
CarbonRom is an aftermarket firmware based on the Android Open Source Project. The team is composed of former members of Team Liquid who have forked the code in an attempt to bring greater speed, better coding, and full authorship to code. We are in no way affiliated with Liquid0624. The rom was forked at Liquid beta 3.2.1 and has since undergone major code changes and modifications.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They "forked" the code, although it was changed a LOT, a fork is a fork
Anyway, I'm gonna have a look later on see if Liquid can be compiled for our p880.
Thanks dimi :good:
MidnightDevil said:
No, they stated the following:
They "forked" the code, although it was changed a LOT, a fork is a fork
Anyway, I'm gonna have a look later on see if Liquid can be compiled for our p880.
Thanks dimi :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No,THANK you man Someone sayed that all 4.2 builds are much better then 4.3 roms builds and i agree on that.
Far as I understood the source is published.
Will see what I can do during the weekend
https://github.com/LiquidSmooth/android
And yeah, I agree, I'm pretty happy with CM10. 1.3. Although I do miss the privacy features from 4.3.
Mods can lock and delete this since demerits answered our prayers and ported new version.
Sent from my microwave.