MiniCm9 3.0.1 What u think of it? - XPERIA X8 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

As in the title write about what u think about that new rom...
And does anybody have any ideas to make the rom even smoother and faster and things like that?

One word : BADASS !
Sent from my E15i using XDA

It's amazing.We now have a (pretty much) fully working ICS rom, except for some tiny mini bugs, but they are to be sorted out...
I use Apex launcher, Ram manager and Advanced Task killer and it's going great...I also changed the settings in Performance nAa told us about, so now it's fast and smooth.

I have to say that the ics camera works better than gb roms camera...
Have u experienced camera crash on gb while takeing 1 - 3 pictures in a row?
With ics i havent had that issue yet... And with ram manager and cpu 120 - 729 run very well...

Vicky26 said:
It's amazing.We now have a (pretty much) fully working ICS rom, except for some tiny mini bugs, but they are to be sorted out...
I use Apex launcher, Ram manager and Advanced Task killer and it's going great...I also changed the settings in Performance nAa told us about, so now it's fast and smooth.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Amost everything same here Simply awesome ROM

pipi14 said:
I have to say that the ics camera works better than gb roms camera...
Have u experienced camera crash on gb while takeing 1 - 3 pictures in a row?
With ics i havent had that issue yet... And with ram manager and cpu 120 - 729 run very well...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes i had this issue!But the pics i took today were amazing... The rom is very fast as well- waaaaaay faster than the 3.0.0 version...

Vicky26 said:
Yes i had this issue!But the pics i took today were amazing... The rom is very fast as well- waaaaaay faster than the 3.0.0 version...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry for off-topic, but does the video recording work with some kind of 3rd party app ? I couldn't really find an answer, cause some people say it doesn't work at all and some other people say it works with an app.
Regards

ziemny said:
Sorry for off-topic, but does the video recording work with some kind of 3rd party app ? I couldn't really find an answer, cause some people say it doesn't work at all and some other people say it works with an app.
Regards
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nAa said this:
"Camcoder works actually. Video encoding is broken so the result isn't pretty."
So the cam is actually recording, but the issue is with the encoding...I haven't tried another app...

Is apex better than trebuchet?
The only issue I have is the autobrightness

amnher said:
Is apex better than trebuchet?
The only issue I have is the autobrightness
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using Nova Launcher (free on the market) and it's super smooth. Try it

thnks for comments guys...now i am gonna try it

Copilot doesnt work..

I had to switch back to Gingerbread, because for me (with and withouth every optimization possible) multitasking and opening different apps are really, really slow. I mean it's like 10 to 20 seconds to open any app after a while, and it's not a really good thing. BUT the rom works and there are just a few bugs, most of them don't even recognizable.
So nAa did a reaaaaally good job, but my opinion is that our low-mem device just can't handle the ICS normally. Remember to read: just my opinion.

Originally Posted by amnher
Is apex better than trebuchet?
The only issue I have is the autobrightness
I`m using launcher pro sense ui... It looks awsome... But yea u should try nova launcher...

Really, what ver do u use? Dont really know that have nAa fixed gps.. But i`m gona try mu ver of copilot i have CoPilot Live EU Full 9.1.0.161

And does anyone used pauls sound add on? I have and i even did take audio primari libs from latest pauls ics port.. And sound is better but does somebody know how to make it even more better?

naa has done a great work..He is one hell of a developer..cheers to him

pipi14 said:
Originally Posted by amnher
Is apex better than trebuchet?
The only issue I have is the autobrightness
I`m using launcher pro sense ui... It looks awsome... But yea u should try nova launcher...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using Apex, after trying many launchers.I tried Go Launcher Ex, it was ok but it started to lag after a while...The same with Launcher Pro Plus...
Then I installed Nova... it was slightly better than Trebuchet, but now I'm on Apex and it's amazing!it's fast, it's smooth, it has transparent drawer which I love...
The main suggestion though, is to have minimum widgets on screen, because widgets make everything slower.Like Facebook widgets and such.I only have a clock (Omega from Themes and Apps), and some contacts for instant phone calls.

pipi14 said:
And does anyone used pauls sound add on? I have and i even did take audio primari libs from latest pauls ics port.. And sound is better but does somebody know how to make it even more better?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
audio primari libs at which folder?
this location>>system\lib\hw\audio.primary.default????

The messaging app slows down the whole phone.. I think you have to use GoSms pro as a replacement

Related

[Q] your rom

Tell me please what rom you have on your phone now and what is better in it then in others?
I use CyanogenMod 7 latest nightlies with glitch kernel, whitch allows you to overclock up to 1.6Ghz. Anyway, I have most of the time my phone overclocked to 1.2Ghz. It's really fast even without overclock. I would recommend you replacing the default launcher (ADW) either with ADW EX or Launcher Pro or anything else, because the ADW App Drawer lags (unlike everything else). I didn't like the default camera app, so I downloaded and installed the MIUI one, which BTW supports touch to focus. Also the rom is highly customizable.
Ok, I heard good things about this rom, but i tried it and it wasn't that good, I think that MIUI is better, but I want to hear more opinions
i am using miui!
for me it feels smoother and faster than samsung roms. i rarly have fcs and it feel very different from any other galaxy rom! just try it and judge for yourself, i did try many roms!
I watched some MIUI videos, but for me it looks too iPhone-like. Maybe I'll give it a try some day. BTW MIUI is based on CyanogenMod, so if you experienced some bug, it will be most likely present in MIUI too. Only think I don't like on CM7 is that the button on stock headset doesn't work (AFAIK it did somewhere around build #12), so I have to always put my phone out my pocket, every time I wanna pause the music
Sorry for my bad English
I use SUPERAOSP AW-8.2. OC 1.4GHz very stable & very fast.
Sent from my Nexus S using XDA App
im using MIUI MCGv6, so far one of the best eyecandy for me. If you want great battery life and performance go for Darkyy's rom
Thank you, Im using MIUI right now, but I dont like it look, it fast and stable most of the time but the it looks too much like an iphone, I didn't tried superaosp, is it that good? or it sometimes unstable?
now using superAOSP, nice and fast, but I am trying to figure out why it drains the battery. I was on JUWE 4.3.1, fast and battery friendly.
And what about juwe's rom?
CM7, hands down. Idk why anyone uses Samsung ROMs. Yeah there may be a few bugs with CM7 but they get fixed every fews days.
I use Bezke's ROM. He is a Hungarian guy and his ROM's are fantasic and very stable. Absolutely recommended, helpful ROM maker.
What about juwe's rom?
i am currently using miui mcgv5.3. it is highly customizable rom and you can easly switch between themes. also it performs good. bettery life is acceptable has no lag issues.
but if want a rom that is best in everything then you can try darkyrom v10. it is really fast and also very stable.
SuperAOSP. Really fast! But I also like CM7, Miui and GalaxySense... no more samsung pleaaase

Should i move to cm9 already ?

Hey guys , i really like the CM9 ICS , but do you guys think it is time to move ???
CM7.1 is just a battery HOG for me , Sammy build roms are laggy...
every thing has its disadvantages and advantages
so what's the Advantages / disadvantages of cm9 ?
enigma575 said:
Hey guys , i really like the CM9 ICS , but do you guys think it is time to move ???
CM7.1 is just a battery HOG for me , Sammy build roms are laggy...
every thing has its disadvantages and advantages
so what's the Advantages / disadvantages of cm9 ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
do you think or know if CM9 will solve the battery hogging issue?
Not sure, but surley if it has battery hog issues , then iam not going to CM9 , waiting for an expert reply though
It's definitely better then CM7, and probably better then many other roms out there. At least try it out.
Cammighty said:
It's definitely better then CM7, and probably better then many other roms out there. At least try it out.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your opinion ! , but can you please give me more details ???
sound ? , BATTERY LIFE ! , colors , gaming performance , LAGGGGG ??
these are my priorities
!!!!!!!!!!àzzZ??
Sent from my PC36100 using xda premium
Try tOnecosmic's ICS Port!!!
It is amazing, good battery life, very smooth, works great as my daily Rom
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1398223
I DON'T recommend going to ICS just yet (unless you want to beta test), builds are still too early, they are unreliable for everyday use and it'll be a while until we get a stable and good performing rom, CM7 is much better right now, but it may change in the future though.
ICS launcher FC a lot, gallery app and browser are laggy, and if you use live wallpapers everything slows down a lot, also there are many app incompatibilities now. I tried to like ICS but it's still in alpha stages (don't believe all those RC1 or beta labels, it's really not ready)
CM7 is great but yes, it's a battery hog. You could use a samsung rom (a custom ODEXED rom or stock are fine) and a custom kernel, I use semaphore with thunderbolt and it's very good performing, it can't touch CM7 in RAM management (isn't as good in multitasking), but videos, games play nice and samsung has a few good apps (it's dialer has smart dialing and its a looker, it can play almost all videos even h264 720p 60fps, music app uses very little battery since it's HW accelerated and its browser is as smooth as the iphone's, it can't be touched by CM7's), and you can delete all other samsung bloatware.
parhelion69 said:
I DON'T recommend going to ICS just yet (unless you want to beta test), builds are still too early, they are unreliable for everyday use and it'll be a while until we get a stable and good performing rom, CM7 is much better right now, but it may change in the future though.
ICS launcher FC a lot, gallery app and browser are laggy, and if you use live wallpapers everything slows down a lot, also there are many app incompatibilities now. I tried to like ICS but it's still in alpha stages (don't believe all those RC1 or beta labels, it's really not ready)
CM7 is great but yes, it's a battery hog. You could use a samsung rom (a custom ODEXED rom or stock are fine) and a custom kernel, I use semaphore with thunderbolt and it's very good performing, it can't touch CM7 in RAM management (isn't as good in multitasking), but videos, games play nice and samsung has a few good apps (it's dialer has smart dialing and its a looker, it can play almost all videos even h264 720p 60fps, music app uses very little battery since it's HW accelerated and its browser is as smooth as the iphone's, it can't be touched by CM7's), and you can delete all other samsung bloatware.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for your reply !! , i used to be on almost every new ROM lately but i couldn't handle the Lag even with using Thunderbolt and stuff , it was veryyy laggy and not responsive , iam now on CM7.1 and i have to say it is waaaaaay faster than the sammy build roms , too bad i get some force closes often and i HATE how low the music is , the music player sucks alot of battery though
my best Samsung experience was on Hybrid roms , stable , fast.
btw not all CM9 builds are bad ! you can try search for the AndroidSoul's review of cm9 , it looks veryyyyy smooth !
any recommendations for now ?
KingBeike said:
Try tOnecosmic's ICS Port!!!
It is amazing, good battery life, very smooth, works great as my daily Rom
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1398223
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks so much man ! i have seen some videos for the onecosmic's port and it is veryy fast indeed !!!!
i wonder how long do you last with heavy usage / medium usage ?
what about standby ?? , iam so going to try this soon !
With heavy usage I can use my Phone one day, but this was the same with Gingerbread.
When I only have low or medium usage, the battery lasts 1 1/2 - 2 Days, very good for a non final release. But most i charge my phone every night.
enigma575 said:
Thanks for your reply !! , i used to be on almost every new ROM lately but i couldn't handle the Lag even with using Thunderbolt and stuff , it was veryyy laggy and not responsive , iam now on CM7.1 and i have to say it is waaaaaay faster than the sammy build roms , too bad i get some force closes often and i HATE how low the music is , the music player sucks alot of battery though
my best Samsung experience was on Hybrid roms , stable , fast.
btw not all CM9 builds are bad ! you can try search for the AndroidSoul's review of cm9 , it looks veryyyyy smooth !
any recommendations for now ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I didn't watch any videos, I flashed both versions myself and ICS isn't ready yet, got too many FC, lags heavily on some occasions and isn't as fast as CM7 (we're talking about the version for the i9000 right? )
It'll reach great performance levels in the future I'm sure, but saying that it's perfect for daily use or better than CM7 is just going a little too far.
And have you tried a high LMK for sammy roms? Like 80MB or higher, you won't be able to multitask much, but performance will be very good for games or heavy apps
parhelion69 said:
I didn't watch any videos, I flashed both versions myself and ICS isn't ready yet, got too many FC, lags heavily on some occasions and isn't as fast as CM7 (we're talking about the version for the i9000 right? )
It'll reach great performance levels in the future I'm sure, but saying that it's perfect for daily use or better than CM7 is just going a little too far.
And have you tried a high LMK for sammy roms? Like 80MB or higher, you won't be able to multitask much, but performance will be very good for games or heavy apps
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I guess iam going to skip flashing CM9 then ! , iam an average-heavy user
- well , i have never tried messing up with memory but i assure you i have had troubles multitasking , and very very very bad response time on almost any sammy rom , even with overclocking i don't really feel any difference
all what i used to flash on sammy roms was base rom + custom rom on top of it + some tweaks like thunderbolt script , overclocking wasn't even noticed
i also used to tweak the colors

[Q] Why Upgrade to ICS... debate..

Hi Folks, I'm currently running JW4 on Semaphore 2.7.4bmfr, bloatware removed, custom theme, UOT icons and effects, various hacks. This Rom is very fast (no lags), fast accurate GPS, I can multitask due to lots of free memory, everything simply works, it never, ever has SOD's or FC's. It looks good and has great battery life.
I'm been considering upgrading to ICS and have been reviewing all of the ROM's. I've discovered that all ICS Roms all seem to have many issues, and to get to this hassled state, requires lots of flashing, wipes and rewipes.
Hmmmm, my (genuine) question is, why should I upgrade to ICS? What does ICS provide over my current fast, stable, long lasting ROM?
It has to be something more than the way it looks (I mean the OS only exists to run your applications) Guess you might say, just try it and you'll see (which means you have no solid reply, it also means I have to spend hours and hours flashing one or more ICS Rom's before deciding, Damn! I need to go back to JW4 as ICS is too slow/buggy/dodgy battery etc. Hence the reason for this question.
Very good question, i've been wondering the same myself as i'm still running cm7.
Sent from my android shizzle!
You should stay on GB . To be honest, I only stay on ICS, because my titanium backups don't work on GB. But I think the difference isn't big.
--------------------------------
I guess it strongly depends on your favors and focus. I'm using ICS since the first days of onecosmics and teamhacksungs ICS roms. ICS has a bunch of goodies and gimmicks but nothing for that you'd say: You can't use a smartphone without it!.
You're not wrong by still using GB, definetly not!
nitrous² said:
I guess it strongly depends on your favors and focus. I'm using ICS since the first days of onecosmics and teamhacksungs ICS roms. ICS has a bunch of goodies and gimmicks but nothing for that you'd say: You can't use a smartphone without it!.
You're not wrong by still using GB, definetly not!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
totally agree.ICS can beat gingerbread in many ways
Face recognizition (i know gingerbread have this but its better on ics)
better UI speed (because of Ui now can use GPU)
and many things i cant remember now.
and about free ram..236 mb free..
now which is better?only better way of gingerbread is multitasking.and ics can beat in several ways.
sorry for my bad english.
with regards to speed, i would have to say that ICS has the edge; I have never had such a smooth experince while browsing and multitasking on GB as I do on ICS. I am currently using DK3 with Devil2 0.71 sio w/ ondemand gov w/ sampling down step @ 5.
nitrous² said:
I guess it strongly depends on your favors and focus. I'm using ICS since the first days of onecosmics and teamhacksungs ICS roms. ICS has a bunch of goodies and gimmicks but nothing for that you'd say: You can't use a smartphone without it!.
You're not wrong by still using GB, definetly not!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can't use a smartphone without it. Ever since I changed over to ics I can't go a day on gb, even with the bugs.
If you like my posts hit thanks
Rom: Dark knight 4
Kernel: Devil Kernel
Keep it ANDROID!!!!!!!!
What about battery life? Does the usage of gpu for ui decrease battery life? How much of a hassle is it to switch from jw5 to ics: can you use your titanium backups at least for user apps?
DocMarc73 said:
What about battery life? Does the usage of gpu for ui decrease battery life? How much of a hassle is it to switch from jw5 to ics: can you use your titanium backups at least for user apps?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I get at least 24 hours usage with ICS. Switching isn't too much hassle, backup with titanium, do a nandroid in CWM, wipe, install ics rom, boot, restore titanium backups.
If anything goes wrong or you want to go back: flash stock JW5, flash kernel with recovery, restore nandroid.
Ics has some features that take your device to a next level.The only think that I don't like is the battery drain.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
sebxtreme said:
Ics has some features that take your device to a next level.The only think that I don't like is the battery drain.
You forgot to mention that the camera is much worst in ICS
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
~UnderTaker~ said:
totally agree.ICS can beat gingerbread in many ways
Face recognizition (i know gingerbread have this but its better on ics)
better UI speed (because of Ui now can use GPU)
and many things i cant remember now.
and about free ram..236 mb free..
now which is better?only better way of gingerbread is multitasking.and ics can beat in several ways.
sorry for my bad english.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what rom is that?? is it slim ics
yahyoh said:
what rom is that?? is it slim ics
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ICSSGS RC4.2 + Devil2 XL kernel.
Im comparing Slim ICS with Darky 10.4.2
With ICS you get better UI experiences.. Smooth and fast..
Browsing is much, much better..
Easy customizable toggles
Easy screenshot
What I dont like:
Camera sucks(less features), cant silent
Battery drains faster
1 lockscreen
Cant join contacts
When ppl call in, picture gets truncated
Default Gallery cant play my AVI files
I will try other ICS roms and decide whether to stick with ICS..
Sure you can join contacts use contapps! I find it the best to sync and join contacts.
+ it has free sms to other contapps users
Tapatalk on S2 "where's the beef"
gila2 said:
Im comparing Slim ICS with Darky 10.4.2
With ICS you get better UI experiences.. Smooth and fast..
Browsing is much, much better..
Easy customizable toggles
Easy screenshot
What I dont like:
Camera sucks(less features), cant silent
Battery drains faster
1 lockscreen
Cant join contacts
When ppl call in, picture gets truncated
Default Gallery cant play my AVI files
I will try other ICS roms and decide whether to stick with ICS..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You don't know what you are saying.
I already used several releases of ICS (AOKP, AOSP, DK, MIUI) and the camera is great and you can silent. About drains, it happen, but depend the type of use. Why you need a different lockscreen? You can join contacts, i already done that. About contact pic, there is another method to override that, it calls HaxSync, by default google don't store high-res pic in contacts.
I'll stay on stock XXJW4.. Satisfies my needs and camera is awesome xD. And I can play several HD games that won't run on ICS
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA
Both have qualities and lacks... with GB and its roms come a superb battery-life, ICS lets you reach evening with a (not much) strong use, but nothing more.
I upgraded to ICS for curiosity, and the only thing i miss is ofc that feature. Wouldn't ever return to GB though: the rest is better on ICS, from UI to browsing
I could never think of going back to a GB rom...
First, with ICS, I finally have that feeling of maturity that the OS wasn't able to provide with previous release.
Second, hardware acceleration alone is worth the switch IMHO.
Third, RFS on Samsung's roms... can't stand it's performance degradation over time and lagfixes are just like Band-aid on an open fracture.
Fourth, kernel devs have pretty much all moved to developping ICS versions of their kernel leaving GB versions to lag behind.
Yes there are a few glitches here and there, but nothing that can prevent me from doing whatever I used to do on Eclair/Froyo/Gingerbread.
The biggest issue with ICS is with deep idle and that's only if you use your phone to listen to music... which is not my case. But then again, if you take some time to read carefully, it is possible to make work quite easilly.
As for the camera thing... you need to compare apples to apples!
As far as I can tell, the camera app used in each and every ICS builds out there is the AOSP camera whereas the camera app in Eclair/Froyo/Gingerbread roms is the one developped by Samsung... not the AOSP one.
Finally, with respect to battery life, i'm using team ICSSGS RC4.2 with Semaphore 1.0.0s kernel and, really, I can't really see any difference. I get the usual 24-30h of battery life I always had before.
There is a lot of truth in many of the posts for and against GB/ICS. I was extremely happy with Darky's ROM, but after seeing the amount of devs playing with ICS I finally took the plunge. ICS I have to say has not been smooth. Many things work well as has been mentioned already e.g. smooth UI etc. But for me few of the many ICS variants work 100% compared to the stabilty of DRom 10.4.2 or JW4 with Semaphore.
My vote for the best ICS variants are Slim ICS as it is stripped down and works and EXTRAOrdinary ICS which is an AOSP. However even with these, the battery life is not as good I have found with GB. Also using a bluetooth car receiver somehow keeps on FC ICS.
I believe the Semaphore Kernel is still the best although I am now trying Icy Glitch.
Watch this space........

Improve 2d performance?

Hi there.
Well I found a couple of threads on how to improve 3d graphics performance but nothing on 2d which is more important to me. So that's why Im asking you guys if anybody knows anything please do let me know even a tinny bit of help would be absolutely appreciated. Cheers !!!
Sent from ...... (guess)
does anybody have any idea ???
OC? or chainfire 3D?
Sent from my GT-P6200 using Tapatalk 2
cheers mate.
but I was thinking of something like tweaks or adreno libs or some sort of script or hardware acceleration or kernel stuff or... not chainfire or oc (overclocked to 980mhz, well it did make stuff a bit smoother but I can't keep it that high, phone will simply melt down, why should we even have to overclock, that just shows the weakness of the OS, 800mhz should be enough to process simple 2d stuff )
Something that could actually make a difference, I'm starting to get fed up with android, my ace originally runs at 800mhz but an iPhone 3gs runs at 600mhz and it doesn't lag as much (in fact it doesn't lag at all, it has less ram than ace)
thanks anyway
Find this line in build.prop
Debug.sf.hw=1
And change it to
#debug.sf.hw=1
already done that, dunno may be it makes things a bit smoother but I didn't notice it so much. thank you very much anyway
Sikorsky96 said:
cheers mate.
but I was thinking of something like tweaks or adreno libs or some sort of script or hardware acceleration or kernel stuff or... not chainfire or oc (overclocked to 980mhz, well it did make stuff a bit smoother but I can't keep it that high, phone will simply melt down, why should we even have to overclock, that just shows the weakness of the OS, 800mhz should be enough to process simple 2d stuff )
Something that could actually make a difference, I'm starting to get fed up with android, my ace originally runs at 800mhz but an iPhone 3gs runs at 600mhz and it doesn't lag as much (in fact it doesn't lag at all, it has less ram than ace)
thanks anyway
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hmm.. you know that iphone 3GS has a PoverVR GPU ? i think it is better than our ace's GPU (adreno200) .. and their CPU is CortexA8 ! it is just underclocked..
kevintangi said:
hmm.. you know that iphone 3GS has a PoverVR GPU ? i think it is better than our ace's GPU (adreno200) .. and their CPU is CortexA8 ! it is just underclocked..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
___________________________________
Yep, but still the hardware on our ace isn't as shi* as you think I mean come on its 2d, I am not even on about 3d. There is gotta be a way. I ran a benchmark (quadrant) on cm9 2d was like 65 fps and on cm7 its like 35. wtf. but the 3d (the 3D graphics) is as smooth as hell. what kinda thing is this that can process 3d but not 2d.
cheers!!!!
Sikorsky96 said:
___________________________________
Yep, but still the hardware on our ace isn't as shi* as you think I mean come on its 2d, I am not even on about 3d. There is gotta be a way. I ran a benchmark (quadrant) on cm9 2d was like 65 fps and on cm7 its like 35. wtf. but the 3d (the 3D graphics) is as smooth as hell. what kinda thing is this that can process 3d but not 2d.
cheers!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well.. if i may know.. why u need 2D that much ? i have no other ideas installed adrenaline engine ?
kevintangi said:
well.. if i may know.. why u need 2D that much ? i have no other ideas installed adrenaline engine ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
_________________________________________
Yep, but doesn't have any effect on 2d.
well I used to play games a lot I mean games like bia2 or nova even dead space, why can our ace process all these 3d stuff with no problem or with the least problems (i mean i wouldn't even expect ace to run dead space have you seen the graphics ??? ) but cant process simple 2d graphics.
I just wanna open up my app drawer and scroll between pages and have no lag i have tried different launchers (go, holo, qq ...) or the phone lags if I scroll down in the settings menu wtf there is literally nothing there but text and a black background.
_________________________________________
surely this is a software issue
Sikorsky96 said:
_________________________________________
Yep, but doesn't have any effect on 2d.
well I used to play games a lot I mean games like bia2 or nova even dead space, why can our ace process all these 3d stuff with no problem or with the least problems (i mean i wouldn't even expect ace to run dead space have you seen the graphics ??? ) but cant process simple 2d graphics.
I just wanna open up my app drawer and scroll between pages and have no lag i have tried different launchers (go, holo, qq ...) or the phone lags if I scroll down in the settings menu wtf there is literally nothing there but text and a black background.
_________________________________________
surely this is a software issue
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
umh, yea.. maybe software issue, btw this always happens in all roms ? mine doesnt seem so ? i think it is ur min CPU freq ? no ?
really, mine doesnt lag at all. some lags do occur when i run several apps at once (tapatalk, opera mini, sms, twitter) at the same time.
side_effect said:
Find this line in build.prop
Debug.sf.hw=1
And change it to
#debug.sf.hw=1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It won't change/do anything. Here is link to Android source code.
kevintangi said:
umh, yea.. maybe software issue, btw this always happens in all roms ? mine doesnt seem so ? i think it is ur min CPU freq ? no ?
really, mine doesnt lag at all. some lags do occur when i run several apps at once (tapatalk, opera mini, sms, twitter) at the same time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
____________________________
My governor is always set to performance. i've tried min 480 and 245 no dif.
performance doesn't really drain my battery and my phone doesn't get as hot as before, interactive works well too
well think about, cm9 65fps cm7 35fps. its definitely software issue our poor ace has good hardware but not the software it deserves.
what are your suggestions people ???? we gotta find a way.
For settings scroll lag, disable scrolling cache! It helps a lot!
galaxyace152 said:
For settings scroll lag, disable scrolling cache! It helps a lot!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
_______________________
cheers, but still not quite there. Have you tried cm9 ??? scroll down and you will see what I mean. It's the true meaning of smoothness (in terms of scrolling not ...
_______________________
by the way what is the build.prop code for scrolling cache ???
waiting waiting waiting .... 2 years later still waiting .... 10 years later still waiting .... 30 years later dead by that time
Sikorsky96 said:
waiting waiting waiting .... 2 years later still waiting .... 10 years later still waiting .... 30 years later dead by that time
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well, here's my opinion about "our-mighty" lag problem.
1. android bellow 3.0(1.5 - 2.3.7) is not using hardware to render UI, it use software rendering instead, so this explain why iPhone 3G(128MB ram, 434Mhz ArmV6, PowerVR MBX<==same GPU as nokia N95) UI scrolling is waaayyy smoother than SGA. even galaxy note is doesnt as smooth as iPhone 3g.(stock GB firmware)
2. android 3.0 & 4.0 is render UI with GPU, BUT some kind of thread-that-response-for touch is not on the TOP PRIORITY, this explain why ICS is lag...specially for our device, and ICS from maclaw is still have some graphical glitches.
3. wanna smooth UI?? try JB alpha.....i think there is no solution for LAG, at least at the moment......
123r4ka456 said:
well, here's my opinion about "our-mighty" lag problem.
1. android bellow 3.0(1.5 - 2.3.7) is not using hardware to render UI, it use software rendering instead, so this explain why iPhone 3G(128MB ram, 434Mhz ArmV6, PowerVR MBX<==same GPU as nokia N95) UI scrolling is waaayyy smoother than SGA. even galaxy note is doesnt as smooth as iPhone 3g.(stock GB firmware)
2. android 3.0 & 4.0 is render UI with GPU, BUT some kind of thread-that-response-for touch is not on the TOP PRIORITY, this explain why ICS is lag...specially for our device, and ICS from maclaw is still have some graphical glitches.
3. wanna smooth UI?? try JB alpha.....i think there is no solution for LAG, at least at the moment......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
___________________________________________
cheers, but :crying: :crying: :crying: :crying: ...
Does the JB alpha drain battry as fast as The ics ???? or its been fixed i was gonna try it but you know its alpha so thought may be later.
i'll give you a thank tomorrow i'm limited to 8 thanks a day What the actual Fuc*.
___________________________________________
And to all the devs out there is there anyway to do this, and is there a way to make this bloody useless OS to use hardware to render UI.
and is cm9 or 10 ever actually gonna be official for ace ??? i don't think so!!! is it???
Sikorsky96 said:
___________________________________________
cheers, but :crying: :crying: :crying: :crying: ...
Does the JB alpha drain battry as fast as The ics ???? or its been fixed i was gonna try it but you know its alpha so thought may be later.
i'll give you a thank tomorrow i'm limited to 8 thanks a day What the actual Fuc*.
___________________________________________
And to all the devs out there is there anyway to do this, and is there a way to make this bloody useless OS to use hardware to render UI.
and is cm9 or 10 ever actually gonna be official for ace ??? i don't think so!!! is it???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think android wasnt that bad......well, compared to BB OS, and symbian
ICS alpha is not for daily use, at least, it will show you smoother UI, and you can wait for next release.
dont bother to thanks me bro
always happy to help ppl.....

Lagness in general

Hi all guys, I want to ask everyone to help me understanding why I my device is a bit laggy. Ok, I don't have a nexus, but I have an amazing quad core processor, a tegra 3 chipset!!
And even if flash custom ROMs I have this lag feeling, and not only feeling sometimes. I will be more accurate.
1) When I install apps or uninstall apps, I have some lags, now OK the phone is doing a big task but it is a bit too laggy.
2) Switching between apps can be laggy some times, and not just with big apps.
3) I have noticed that even having not much apps working background, the phone give me this impression of lagness, I have 1gb ram and a quad core, I get angry if it start to run slowly only for some apps working background, I mean the hardware is powerfully enough.
After all I must say that I have tryed these ROMs.
Carbon, slimbean, liquid smooth, and CyanogenMod (that is a bit better on performance).
My favourite is slimbean because I feel it stable.
And I have tryed most of the kernels, like werewolf, optimous prime, and iodak at last, and I like this last one.
Can someone help me understand this? Thank you guys!
Ah, sorry for my not clear English :S
LoKKeR said:
Hi all guys, I want to ask everyone to help me understanding why I my device is a bit laggy. Ok, I don't have a nexus, but I have an amazing quad core processor, a tegra 3 chipset!!
And even if flash custom ROMs I have this lag feeling, and not only feeling sometimes. I will be more accurate.
1) When I install apps or uninstall apps, I have some lags, now OK the phone is doing a big task but it is a bit too laggy.
2) Switching between apps can be laggy some times, and not just with big apps.
3) I have noticed that even having not much apps working background, the phone give me this impression of lagness, I have 1gb ram and a quad core, I get angry if it start to run slowly only for some apps working background, I mean the hardware is powerfully enough.
After all I must say that I have tryed these ROMs.
Carbon, slimbean, liquid smooth, and CyanogenMod (that is a bit better on performance).
My favourite is slimbean because I feel it stable.
And I have tryed most of the kernels, like werewolf, optimous prime, and iodak at last, and I like this last one.
Can someone help me understand this? Thank you guys!
Ah, sorry for my not clear English :S
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I always felt that too, until I flashed kit kat and mokee kernel. You can try it out
If you're on stock, number 1. might be caused by MLT: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2187920
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
Nono i don't like anymore stock beucase is not best for performance. Anyway thank @Coolneng I will try it. There are compatibility issues for apps like GTA or something else? I have heard something.
LoKKeR said:
Nono i don't like anymore stock beucase is not best for performance. Anyway thank @Coolneng I will try it. There are compatibility issues for apps like GTA or something else? I have heard something.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have no idea, I don't play any games on phone ^^
I have tried kitkat and it is nice, but it's not much stable so I have chosen to return to stock (zaiben rom) with iodak kernel and I'm impressed, it is fast and smooth with this kernel.
Anyway I think that all Roms that we have are unstable in their way, so I prefer stock where all works.
LoKKeR said:
I have tried kitkat and it is nice, but it's not much stable so I have chosen to return to stock (zaiben rom) with iodak kernel and I'm impressed, it is fast and smooth with this kernel.
Anyway I think that all Roms that we have are unstable in their way, so I prefer stock where all works.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you're on a stock based ROM, I suggest you still check for that MLT apk
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
This rom doesn't have mlt.apk but have logservice.apk and if I delete it the Rom stop working
Kernel : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=50072951&postcount=2066 (Iodak v9.95)
Rom : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2481929
Try to do a full wipe of /system before install .
Trickster mod settings :
CPUQuiet : balanced
Multicore power saving : 1
CPU : Max 1.3 Ghz , Interactive
Try lagfix https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.grilledmonkey.lagfix&hl=en
I feel my phone more smoothly after i dezactivate all animations .

Categories

Resources