Database Develop

[Q]choose of rom

Hi. I'm currently using MIUI rom.
But its battery drain can't be help. Thought of using cm7 kang.
But the outlook of cm7 bores me as im used too have it on my optimus one..
Which rom do you guys recommend? Sorry for my engrish.....
Sent from my Optimus 2X using Tapatalk

OK i think it CM7 is out of the picture. I am on CM7 at the moment and I do like MIUI but it is very integrated and sensitive. Have you tried vandonkas kernel on miui? http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1427646 or check my thread for other alternatives http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1460147

CM7/KANG (by Temasek) is my last choice... and my best one (IMHO) - Battery life with custom Kernel "CherryPicks" (I didn't try the stock one) is very nice.
A well balanced performance/batterylife one, with all CM7 options, spare parts and so on...
Hope this helps (a bit )

Try MIUI or CM7 with Vadonka's kernel. Should give pretty good battery life

Thanks for the replies.
I'm using back swiftextreme kernel back because its more lag free.
Do you guys recommend me the v20o stock with horse power kernel? :B
Sent from my Optimus 2X using Tapatalk

I don't use Stock roms anymore, even wiith v20L/O, but read some posts and impressions seems pretty good. With HP Kernel you can expect good performance, but no sure about the BatteryLife...
and if you need continuous improvements/battery balance, the custom ROMs and Kernels will give more choice - in my humble experience...

The battery life is indeed excellent with spica's or fps kernels! Three days and even more have been reported. If you use the phone a lot spica's sr1 or sr2 is very good, and the the pre-12 seems to be even better.

The problem with the stock ROMs it's the slowly fluency a pair of days later.
MIUI with vadonka's kernels has a battery save impressive and with a great fluency all the time.
The people speak very well about spica's kernels, it can be a good choise.

http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1410662
this is a great ROM...with HP and either ICS or Swish...
infact the SR2 and the RC-11R both works great....i have 2days and 18hrs now and still left with 41% battery perf.....good work Carburano

can we use vandonkas or spica's or fps kernels with stock 20l ?

freemannnn said:
can we use vandonkas or spica's or fps kernels with stock 20l ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
spica / fps = yes
vandonkas only if you want bootloop (CM only)

so with stock 20l or stock 20o which one do u suggest for stability no lags and good battery life.

freemannnn said:
so with stock 20l or stock 20o which one do u suggest for stability no lags and good battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the v20o is leaked version, i.e. not final / beta. but its working fine.
l/m is very good and stable.
i personally use the o leaked version with fps kernel

[Q] What Kernel are you using with what Rom and why?

As the title suggests I would like to know what kernel people are using with what Rom and why.
Do you use the same Kernel with every Rom you flash?

EwOkie said:
As the title suggests I would like to know what kernel people are using with what Rom and why.
Do you use the same Kernel with every Rom you flash?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well im on stock 2.2.1 froyo with CF-ROOT kernel. got this phone as present lats week. haven`t flash it yet xD but ,as anyone here, i just love flashing

I am using cm9 nightlies - based on 4.0.4 because of its stability, good battery life and performance, settings + twics - tw launcher, weather widget and some other things from sgs3, atm with devil3 .79 kernel, with stock ram (378mb, if needed, i can increase it up to 403mb), stable oc up to 1400mhz (with semaphore 1140max., 1200 -> bootloop), also gpu is oc-able ... but if u dont want to oc, semaphore kernel is better for u

I'm reinstalling right now the miui speed ics by lucainno, with devil3 kernel. I really love this rom expecially for the layout, which is different from any other rom! The speed is great and battery life as well. And the kernel is simply... awesome! For its customization

Hi, I'm using ics 4.0.4 cna by franzy with the midnight kernel. I had the devil before but i got a bootloop. With the last midnight the phone is smooth, no lags, good battery life, no bugs until now !

Saurom jw5 + semaphore + ext4 works for me.. very smooth ops. Sticking to 2.3.6 for the fm radio
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA

I'm running the CM9 nightlies as well, with a Semaphore kernel. Very stable and good batteri life, although I'm thinking about comparing with a devil3 kernel. Right now, with the battery life I'm having the most important thing for me is the stability, though.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium

SGS I9000 on CM9; batterylife; kernelversion

Dear all,
Last week I installed CM9 on my SGS GT-I9000. I am very very happy about it as the device works very well and fast :laugh:
So, that's great!
The only issue I have with CM9 is the short batterylife. I installed CPU-Spy and this app showed that my phone turns into deep sleep when the phone is on stand-by. I also shut down the background processes, put the screen on low light etc.
When I put my telephone on stand by modus, It lasts +- 20 hours which is okay (I think). But when I start using my phone ('whatsapp' some now and than, checking news, nothing special) the battery runs empty in a very short period of time.
What can I do about this issue? I read some threads about changing de kernel version? Which kernel would be the right one? What does it do?
Or is it also an option to switch to CM7? Does CM7 use less battery?
I would really like to hear some of your advices on this :fingers-crossed:
Kind regards,
Jurjen

Stock fws have the best battery life. If you want an other kernel, flash Devil or Semaphore ICS.

dark_knight35 said:
Stock fws have the best battery life. If you want an other kernel, flash Devil or Semaphore ICS.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for that. I'm only interested in replacing the kernel if that kernel will improve batterylife Do you think it will?
My current kernel is 3.0.8-g54d09f2 [email protected] #1
Where can I find the Devil or Semaphore kernel?
Kind regards,
Jurjen

Just try them an then choose what's better for you.
You will find them quickly if you look in the I9000 android development forum. Make sure you get the ICS kernels (do not confuse with JB or GB kernels)

Once you switched the kernel, you're not done yet. You may set kernel parameters as governor or scheduler for example to get better battery life.
Sent from my Gameboy Color

Need a good non-oc kernel

Basically I have the SGSII JB ROM v10.1 installed and it has an oc-kernel.
I just want a good non-oc-kernel that will give me a good battery life and good performance.
Can somebody recommend me a non-oc-kernel?
Ive look at battery extender 1.6, would this be ok?
Thanks

Almost All the kernels from the stock roms has OC..as per as i know..
Try to Extract Kernel From Original Firmware..

There's Battery Extender 1.5.1 for STOCK roms
batteryExtender1.5.1.zip: 04/08/2012
Fsync was activated for some reason so woops. I deactivated... also some other small changes. Battery driver is the same.
This time NONOC and OC.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=1240667&d=1344058245
download link is for non-oc battery extender 1.5.1
There's Firekernel for CM7
https://dl.dropbox.com/u/1664131/firekernel-09.10.12.zip
That's the latest firekernel as far as I know.

Why are most kernels OC when this is said to damage the phone?

Weeeman said:
Why are most kernels OC when this is said to damage the phone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I read somewhere 921mhz OC is stable for ace...

[poll] what is the best kernel for the official ics ?

hey guys ,, i have finished all my work on viperx but im having difficulties for finding a suitable kernel to use without getting big battery drain ,,please select wisely ONLY according to battery life :angel:

I just tried Noobys kernel apart from stock one, I sometimes get excelent battery life, using almost 5hours of wifi, like 48 hours, but some days i cant get through the day, I think is related to my installed apps..
I wish i had tried more kernels to help you decide which one to use in your ROM, because im actually using Nemesis 2, but happens that i find both (rom+kernel) very stable for everyday use, and want to keep it like that.

rrgrrg said:
hey guys ,, i have finished all my work on viperx but im having difficulties for finding a suitable kernel to use without getting big battery drain ,,please select wisely ONLY according to battery life :angel:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
IMO, The most important thing to chose a kernel is first it should stable, then good battery life. For include in your ROM I suggest you use the kernel that stable for everyone. As you know, every device has it own limitation, how high it can handle the clock, how low it can handle the voltage.
Why?
Some user dont know what custom kernel is, and what the advantages and disadvantages if using custom kernel. Some user usually flash and use the ROM as it is. If they flash the ROM and the ROM doesnt stable for them, mostlikely they will say something like "The ROM is not stable, I got SOD" or "This ROM is sucks, often reboot by itself". Yes, they will blame the ROM, whereas actually it because their device cant handle the UV or OC kernel.
Also you can write suggestion to use custom kernel to gain more battery life/performance in your ROM's thread.
The users can easily to flash other kernel that they like after they flash the ROM.
Well, this is just my thought. The decisions is up to you
----------------
as for the poll, I choose ZGK v0.1-beta, coz:
- 200/500/700/1000/1100 (OC not too high so it save, 200 as min clock good battery in deep sleep)
- stock voltage (no SOD)
- stable for my old P970, and battery drain is good enough

t0g3 said:
IMO, The most important thing to chose a kernel is first it should stable, then good battery life. For include in your ROM I suggest you use the kernel that stable for everyone. As you know, every device has it own limitation, how high it can handle the clock, howlow it can handle the voltage.
Why?
Some user dont know what custom kernel is, and what the advantages and disadvantages if using custom kernel. Some user usually flash and use the ROM as it is. If they flash the ROM and the ROM doesnt stable for them, mostlikely they will say something like "The ROM is not stable, I got SOD" or "This ROM is sucks, often reboot by itself". Yes, they will blame the ROM, whereas actually it because their device cant handle the UV or OC kernel.
Also you can write suggestion to use custom kernel to gain more battery life/performance in your ROM's thread.
The users can easily to flash other kernel that they like after they flash the ROM.
Well, this is just my thought. The decisions is up to you
----------------
as for the poll, I choose ZGK v0.1-beta, coz:
- 200/500/700/1000/1100 (OC not too high so it save, 200 as min clock good battery in deep sleep)
- stock voltage (no SOD)
- stable for my old P970, and battery drain is good enough
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that is what im thinking of , but i need the best out of the kernel ,, hellmanor will help me out on this and with god's will i will release my rom next week probably :victory:

I was using Hellmanor's kernel for some days (Toccata 0.3) and the very was excellent!!! No problem with stability, always go in deep sleep.
Right now Im testing Adagio 0.1a hv
Sent from my LG-P970 using Tapatalk 2

is the viper ROM included any v30c stuff? or only v30b
this time plz release only after thorough testing with all fixes..
Sent from my LG-P970 using xda premium

srikanth_kande said:
is the viper ROM included any v30c stuff? or only v30b
this time plz release only after thorough testing with all fixes..
Sent from my LG-P970 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
currently my rom is based on marvel d ,, i hope N00BY release a deoxeded v30c repack

removed

i think this week i will release my rom ,, it will be using Heuxxx Kernel :good: if he agrees ,if not i will use adaigo stable Hv :fingers-crossed: