hello, after using this aokp rom after a week, most message that i have sent cant received by recipient. please help
Sent from my GT-P1000 using XDA
Just throw AOPK away and install CyanogenMod 9.
What reasons would you give that cm9 is better than AOPK?
Regarding messages ~ Do you have the correct modem installed?
Awology said:
What reasons would you give that cm9 is better than AOPK?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's simple. AOPK have weird numbering like Build 38, Build 40 and what so ever. CyanogenMod even released Release Candidate One. We have constantly updating nightly builds and I think this summer we will have stable ICS for Galaxy Tab, when AOPK can further live long with another Build 65 or Build 79 and its ROM Settings section. I'm just saying.
Your reasoning is number based? Cm9 release nightly builds and UPDATES~
Where AOKP releases Build numbers which are less frequent but there seems to be a lot more features integrated. I installed Cm9 for a few days before moving over to AOKP which seems to offer more.
One thing that defiantly stood out in Cm9 was the boot loader, which is far superior to the pony one AOKP has, but that was easy to replace.
Winudert said:
That's simple. AOPK have weird numbering like Build 38, Build 40 and what so ever. CyanogenMod even released Release Candidate One. We have constantly updating nightly builds and I think this summer we will have stable ICS for Galaxy Tab, when AOPK can further live long with another Build 65 or Build 79 and its ROM Settings section. I'm just saying.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Awology said:
Your reasoning is number based? Cm9 release nightly builds and UPDATES~
Where AOKP releases Build numbers which are less frequent but there seems to be a lot more features integrated. I installed Cm9 for a few days before moving over to AOKP which seems to offer more.
One thing that defiantly stood out in Cm9 was the boot loader, which is far superior to the pony one AOKP has, but that was easy to replace.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dudes, how exactly would this help the problem at hand -- no messaging after install? If he is having the wrong modem installed, it won't help migrating from AOKP to CM9.
We are lucky enough to have choices of CM9, AOKP, GUMMY and AOKP SGT7 (Which I believe better than AOKP official build AND still have the mods from CM9 kernel). I am sure any of them is better than the Value Pack released by SAMSUNG. Do we need to argue on which is better?
Awology said:
Your reasoning is number based? Cm9 release nightly builds and UPDATES~
Where AOKP releases Build numbers which are less frequent but there seems to be a lot more features integrated. I installed Cm9 for a few days before moving over to AOKP which seems to offer more.
One thing that defiantly stood out in Cm9 was the boot loader, which is far superior to the pony one AOKP has, but that was easy to replace.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It wasn't bootloader, it is boot animation.
And it wasn't a pony, it was a pink unicorn. Hehe.
Sent from my GT-P1000 using xda app-developers app
Related
Hi all,
I would like to find a proper CM9 Kang, meaning a build that is as close as possible to the CM9 source, with no or very little additions.
Does such a thing still exist?
Owain's build, excellent though it might be, is no longer a kang. Too many extra's...
Temasek isn't kanging for CM9, unfortunately.
Any propositions?
tia,
Tommmii.
How about the original CM9?
http://rootzwiki.com/topic/18090-cyanogenmod9-for-o2x-and-g2x-selfkang3/
not a bad idea, but there are many many improvements submitted to the git since selfkang3 rendering it definitely outdated.
Tommmii said:
Owain's build, excellent though it might be, is no longer a kang. Too many extra's...
Temasek isn't kanging for CM9, unfortunately.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not so many "extras" that it would be "overkill". So where is the problem?
I guess you could use a KANG from Owain, before he added so many things and changed to an Unofficial build intead, try looking at build 30-35 perhaps?
I´m not familiar with any other kang´s other than the original kang´s.
But, Owain´s Builds aren´t that much different from the original CM9, I would give it a try.
Thanks Myller!
I´m now running owain´s latest build, and there´s not much difference (well there are, stability wise from the selfkang3).
donkeyaner said:
Not so many "extras" that it would be "overkill". So where is the problem?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll quote the dev, Owain94, himself :
also i think i should change the name this is not really a cm9 kang anymore...
still based in the big parts on cm9 but changed way to much
Anyway, there'll be an official ICS from LG soon, followed by official CM9 nightlies.
Tommmii said:
I'll quote the dev, Owain94, himself :
also i think i should change the name this is not really a cm9 kang anymore...
still based in the big parts on cm9 but changed way to much
Anyway, there'll be an official ICS from LG soon, followed by official CM9 nightlies.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately I don't see an ICS release from LG coming any time soon... Yes, they told that it would happen in Q2 this year, but they seem to dodge any question from costumers regarding that question.
I sincerely believe that we won't see any release from LG before Q3 2012...
You can use euroskank builds too, there are only some cherry picks
http://fitsnugly.euroskank.com/skankwich/?id=p990
jgoliveira said:
I sincerely believe that we won't see any release from LG before Q3 2012...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but...I believe in Santa Claus, fairies, unicorns, LG software updates and mermaids.
Hey does anyone remember how we got added to the cm builds last year? Sort of feeling like were out of the loop cm wise as we used to have our own stables and nightlies.
sent from app
Say what?
They went down due to server relocation and now 7.2-RC3 is the latest. http://get.cm/?device=vivo
There isn't much point to have nightlies to release nowadays for CM7 as there isn't much to update. You can see gingerbread updates here:
http://review.cyanogenmod.com/#/q/status:open+branch:gingerbread,n,z
kaijura said:
Say what?
They went down due to server relocation and now 7.2-RC3 is the latest. http://get.cm/?device=vivo
There isn't much point to have nightlies to release nowadays for CM7 as there isn't much to update. You can see gingerbread updates here:
http://review.cyanogenmod.com/#/q/status:open+branch:gingerbread,n,z
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was thinking more of cm9 ics nightlies would be awesome.
Sent from my Incredible S using xda premium
In CM9's case we likely aren't going to get any updates until the official 3.0 kernel sources are out for one of the msm7x30's. HTC has 90 days to release it after they provide official OTA update. I believe the teams will prefer's USA/WWE RUU's, not the China stuff we have right now.
Desire S and Desire HD are closest cousins to us. When the kernel sources are out, they will likely work on coding with the proprietary camera files that comes with official sense 3.6 to make it compatible with CM9 / AOSP.
Most of the CM9 devices on there right now already have their official ICS kernel source available and stuff's already worked on/being touched up on. Samsung's ahead of the game at this point.
That is why there are Playground and IceCold for now, you can picture them as 'hacked' roms to use GB files/code to make it work with ICS.
Hi All
Now Cyanogen Team said they will stop working on CM9 and they release Stable version but when I went to check the Nightly ROM I found they still working on it.
Stable mean no bugs and Nightly under upgrading to become stable.
Why they release stable ROM.
Who will explain this?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
mgra99 said:
Why they release stable ROM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as i understand... When the Nightlies become better and better the developers start a feature freeze. This means no new functions or crazy experiments - just bughunting! This is made in the RC (Release Candidate) builds. If everyone is satisfied with the RC builds, it is getting stable status.
The work on new nightlies is parallel to this process, i think!
mgra99 said:
Who will explain this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Explain what? Explain the new nightlies?
No developer would throw ICS out of the window, just because JB hit the market. Look, there are still cm7-nightlies on cyanogen build machines!
Rush
You should keep in mind that some newer version might not work well even when the development has finished due to hardware limitations.So people might want to have the maximum working version on their devices. Hipothetically if Jelly bean won't work well on our devices, then atleast we'll have a bug free ICS rom.
Hey guys, I'm thinking of compiling a CM ROM from source next month (have to wait for data cap to reset) and was wondering what you guys would prefer, a significantly more stable CM9, or a more buggy (and more headaches for me) CM10 ROM? I personally would prefer to do a CM9 ROM since it would be easier to support and fix bugs on, since we already have relatively stable, working builds of AOSP ICS. CM10 would be great as well, but it would be much harder for me to support, since I would be the second dev for the Inc S to build a JB ROM from source for us. I just don't think I have the know-how to be the only one working on it, and the only one fixing bugs and whatnot, without any already working source code to view and compare.
So I could compile CM9.2 stable, and we would have the latest CM9 code using kaijura's IceColdSandwich as a reference. I would have an easier time supporting the ICS ROM since I would have working source code to compare and review. Also, it would be significantly more stable simply due to the fact that multiple devs for our device have already worked on it. I'm sure I'd be able to fix bugs and support it fairly easily, other devs are the best resource around
Or I could compile a CM10 ROM. I would have to take device proprietary files from nik's JB ROM's, which would mean my compiled ROM would share a lot of the same bugs our current JB ROM's already have. I could support and fix bugs in CM10, it would just take longer and be harder to do. Nothing's impossible though, so if that's what the community wants, then that's what I'll build!
So what do you guys think? CM10 or CM9?
It's your time and effort you do what Rom you want to do. Any Rom would be great!
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using Tapatalk 2
vizzy said:
It's your time and effort you do what Rom you want to do. Any Rom would be great!
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm torn between the two! On the one hand, I want a stable ROM which would be CM9, but I also love that JellyBean goodness. I've also seen some people here that simply want a stable CM9 that's up to date, and other's that want the latest CM10 despite bugs. That's the point of this thread
I would tell u is that first for cm9 when we get a stable awesome cm9 for sure it will be easy to get a cm10... btw are u going to build a kernel?
My vote goes towards CM9! been using codename for the past couple months and although i'm enjoying all the new features, i still find myself yearning for a rock solid & stable ASOP based build.
Sent from my Incredible S using Tapatalk 2
linezero said:
I would tell u is that first for cm9 when we get a stable awesome cm9 for sure it will be easy to get a cm10... btw are u going to build a kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I could give it a try, but if nik and others couldn't get a 3.0 kernel up and running for AOSP, then I'll have a damn hard time. I'd prefer to have someone else make the new kernel, I don't know much about compiling them. Till then, I would just use X-ICS4.0 for the kernel.
Make a CM9, CM10 would have in the end too much bugs and they would just chance again. I'm waiting for a stable cm9 anyway
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda app-developers app
Kernel 3, Cm10 got my vote
sent from my jellybean device
ZaySk said:
Hey guys, I'm thinking of compiling a CM ROM from source next month (have to wait for data cap to reset) and was wondering what you guys would prefer, a significantly more stable CM9, or a more buggy (and more headaches for me) CM10 ROM? I personally would prefer to do a CM9 ROM since it would be easier to support and fix bugs on, since we already have relatively stable, working builds of AOSP ICS. CM10 would be great as well, but it would be much harder for me to support, since I would be the second dev for the Inc S to build a JB ROM from source for us. I just don't think I have the know-how to be the only one working on it, and the only one fixing bugs and whatnot, without any already working source code to view and compare.
So I could compile CM9.2 stable, and we would have the latest CM9 code using kaijura's IceColdSandwich as a reference. I would have an easier time supporting the ICS ROM since I would have working source code to compare and review. Also, it would be significantly more stable simply due to the fact that multiple devs for our device have already worked on it. I'm sure I'd be able to fix bugs and support it fairly easily, other devs are the best resource around
Or I could compile a CM10 ROM. I would have to take device proprietary files from nik's JB ROM's, which would mean my compiled ROM would share a lot of the same bugs our current JB ROM's already have. I could support and fix bugs in CM10, it would just take longer and be harder to do. Nothing's impossible though, so if that's what the community wants, then that's what I'll build!
So what do you guys think? CM10 or CM9?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cm9 bro! because ics kernel source is out and bugs can be fixed!
Yeah. CM9 would be OK for me too. I can help with testing if needed.
But what would be those great JB features we would be missing out? Sry I haven't been following the differences between 4.0 and 4.1.
IncS community is desperate for at least one fully functional, bugless AOSP ROM, so my vote goes for CM9
CM9 bro..wishing for bugless one.. gud luck..
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda app-developers app
My 2 cents.
CM9. Kernel sources for ICS has been release by HTC and ANY AOSP rom that is stable would be very welcome in our community.
(I know there is gingerbread roms.. But.. Its ginger bread..)
Jelly Bean is nice and all,
But the odds of getting a stable AOSP rom are much higher with cm9.
CM9 I would say. I hope you can fix data problems for Vodafone NL users. We always have problems with data connection on AOSP ROMs.
CM9 would be great....!!
Its great to see devs are enthusiasticaly working on Roms..!!
You are the one dude...
Jst for info u might already aware of
This thread
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1914015
CM10 test build
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda app-developers app
my vote a CM9 ASOP rom and bugless
Sent from my Incredible S using xda premium
naathaanb96 said:
cm9 bro! because ics kernel source is out and bugs can be fixed!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Totally agree. I don't like much sense ROMs, CM9 with working camera and camcorder would be perfect!
Thanks ZaySk
CM9!!!!
ZaySk said:
Hey guys, I'm thinking of compiling a CM ROM from source next month (have to wait for data cap to reset) and was wondering what you guys would prefer, a significantly more stable CM9, or a more buggy (and more headaches for me) CM10 ROM? I personally would prefer to do a CM9 ROM since it would be easier to support and fix bugs on, since we already have relatively stable, working builds of AOSP ICS. CM10 would be great as well, but it would be much harder for me to support, since I would be the second dev for the Inc S to build a JB ROM from source for us. I just don't think I have the know-how to be the only one working on it, and the only one fixing bugs and whatnot, without any already working source code to view and compare.
So I could compile CM9.2 stable, and we would have the latest CM9 code using kaijura's IceColdSandwich as a reference. I would have an easier time supporting the ICS ROM since I would have working source code to compare and review. Also, it would be significantly more stable simply due to the fact that multiple devs for our device have already worked on it. I'm sure I'd be able to fix bugs and support it fairly easily, other devs are the best resource around
Or I could compile a CM10 ROM. I would have to take device proprietary files from nik's JB ROM's, which would mean my compiled ROM would share a lot of the same bugs our current JB ROM's already have. I could support and fix bugs in CM10, it would just take longer and be harder to do. Nothing's impossible though, so if that's what the community wants, then that's what I'll build!
So what do you guys think? CM10 or CM9?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My request would be neither CM9 nor CM 10.... it will be great if you can work on Kernel Version 3.... Becz that is the only roadblock for us for Jelly Bean and would open doors for may developers to come up with fresh and exciting jelly bean ROMs.....Why stay behind the world guys... lets target Jelly bean step by step.....who knows if you start working on kernel it may really turn out to be good.....Try for kernel bro......all the best.. try to compile it from source....
A rock solid cm9 would be great!
Sent from my Incredible S using xda app-developers app
hey guys, do not know much about the CyanogenMod roms, I wonder what the difference between the versions and nightly snapshot?
Sorry for my bad English.
elderap said:
hey guys, do not know much about the CyanogenMod roms, I wonder what the difference between the versions and nightly snapshot?
Sorry for my bad English.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Snapshot is a stable point where almost everything worked 100%. A couple of bugs that most people will miss and a few that is annoying but doesn't make it unstable.
The nightlies are not so well tested and receive commits from the main CM branch. They include the latest bugfixes and features but it might not be as stable.
elderap said:
hey guys, do not know much about the CyanogenMod roms, I wonder what the difference between the versions and nightly snapshot?
Sorry for my bad English.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First correct me if I'm wrong, other ppl like xonar_ definitly know more about it.
CM 7 is GB
CM 9 is ICS
CM 10 is JB
nighlys are done everyday and not much tested, I heard there are done automaticaly by a build robot
M snapshots are more tested and seem to come out every month
RC is tested a lot and the CM ppl think it is stable, if they find errors in it there will be another RC that corrects the errors, if not it will be declared stable
SaschaKH said:
First correct me if I'm wrong, other ppl like xonar_ definitly know more about it.
CM 7 is GB
CM 9 is ICS
CM 10 is JB
nighlys are done everyday and not much tested, I heard there are done automaticaly by a build robot
M snapshots are more tested and seem to come out every month
RC is tested a lot and the CM ppl think it is stable, if they find errors in it there will be another RC that corrects the errors, if not it will be declared stable
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Everything is correct except nightly. Nightlys are only built when there are commits. Everyday means that the dev of the phone for CM has done a commit. That's why this week its everyday.
Sent from my LG-P970 using Tapatalk 2
SoulExertz said:
Everything is correct except nightly. Nightlys are only built when there are commits. Everyday means that the dev of the phone for CM has done a commit. That's why this week its everyday.
Sent from my LG-P970 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not just the develeoper of the phone. We also receive commits from the main CM10 branch. If you look at the device specific and kernel commits then you'll see that new nightlys are sometimes being released without there being any changes too them. CM10 still has bugs on the main branch and those bugs can be fixed by any person at CM not just our awesome phone developer rmcc.
Sent from my LG-P970
In this case, they are automatically released, this is why a later version "nightly" can not contain an adjustment that had been made in the last version (as in the case of video recording in our CM10 that worked in past releases and the latest does not work), leaving only when another snapshot version is that everything was done correctly should not it contain?
Snapshot or Release Candidates
Thanks for you wonderful explanation guys, but this might be a noobish question, if I were to choose or you are, would you pick snapshot or RC's?
Thanks! :good:
StanceMitchell said:
Thanks for you wonderful explanation guys, but this might be a noobish question, if I were to choose or you are, would you pick snapshot or RC's?
Thanks! :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Depends on how close to the RC the snapshot is....
A snapshot from the day after a RC should be almost identical to the RC, plus (hopefully) fixes.
A snapshot far after a release could be introducing a bunch of new features (and bugs to go with them).
I'd be more interested in reading snapshot changelogs, relative to the last release or release candidate.