Database Develop

[Q] Implementing autofocus in video LG 2X

Hi I wanted to know why you can not implement the continuous fire in the video, any rom, which is stock or cm7 or even CM9.
I remember someone was working but then you have not heard more talk about anything and that version was not fully functional.
Can you tell me something?

I think it's because the Nvidia drivers that runs the camera are closed source and modding AF requires this sources to work properly.

tablighs said:
I think it's because the Nvidia drivers that runs the camera are closed source and modding AF requires this sources to work properly.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So if as you say would be enough to extrapolate from the sources of Lg Gingerbread stock rom to try to do this mod.
Even if I repeat someone had already tried to do it!

Motorola Triumph >< Huawei X6 n friends

Hello guys
Based on my investigation several time ago,,I was look up some ROM and development for Triumph n X6 from several forums
For now,,development of Moto Triumph stepping far from Huawei X6,,I was looked some new update ROM especially ICS ROM
I want asking to someone who know about development
What different Triumph from X6?just CDMA >< GSM or more??Is Motorola have individual brand build?
Is possible to get flash ROM based from Triumph??
I'm asking because I found Triumph have AOKP ICS developers
Since edowar who develop AOSP ICS gone,,X6 device development for AOSP ICS stuck at alpha5,,
Sorry if I like blaming or flaming developers,,but I just want to know if X6 can use Triumph ROM or not
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2

I don't agree with you. Triumph not stepping far from X6. Both features have the same progress, even triumph camera capturing still not work on ICS while ours already work.
Some devs... Tj and ardX still in progress for AOSP ICS for our device, we also have a step forward for camera. Zuk also available to port it, and I think he will definitely port it to any other rom for this ICS. But be patient, they're working on it. They work to make camera work perfect with video and not interfere with wifi functionality also. After that, here... will be more ICS roms port and mod... Zuk, elol and other porter will get additional spirit to port and may be me also .
X6 can use Triumph rom, but it will not get the signal and may be you can't use touch screen also. Need some touch to port it, but then the features still lack of camera. Camera is a must for me and for some of us. I can't use ICS if camera not work.

CacingKalung said:
I don't agree with you. Triumph not stepping far from X6. Both features have the same progress, even triumph camera capturing still not work on ICS while ours already work.
Some devs... Tj and ardX still in progress for AOSP ICS for our device, we also have a step forward for camera. Zuk also available to port it, and I think he will definitely port it to any other rom for this ICS. But be patient, they're working on it. They work to make camera work perfect with video and not interfere with wifi functionality also. After that, here... will be more ICS roms port and mod... Zuk, elol and other porter will get additional spirit to port and may be me also .
X6 can use Triumph rom, but it will not get the signal and may be you can't use touch screen also. Need some touch to port it, but then the features still lack of camera. Camera is a must for me and for some of us. I can't use ICS if camera not work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
whatabout u8800? zuk has some roms from there as well. and u8800 has ICS based on u8860 (huawei honor).
huawei honor's chipset is MSM8255T, mi410 is MSM8255. I've posted the link to the files, but the firmware is only in .app file.. no idea how to extract or turn it into .nb0 to extract the libs and stuff..

cheezzzz said:
whatabout u8800? zuk has some roms from there as well. and u8800 has ICS based on u8860 (huawei honor).
huawei honor's chipset is MSM8255T, mi410 is MSM8255. I've posted the link to the files, but the firmware is only in .app file.. no idea how to extract or turn it into .nb0 to extract the libs and stuff..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The features here meant for hardware related with the kernel. Any port need specific kernel to those device it self, including ours. Ofcourse we can use some library from identic device hardware, but kernel drive them.

CacingKalung said:
The features here meant for hardware related with the kernel. Any port need specific kernel to those device it self, including ours. Ofcourse we can use some library from identic device hardware, but kernel drive them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so does this mean to get a working ICS rom lets say aurora ICS which is derived from U8860, we need to rebuild our kernel that will function on our devices? because kernels are device specific right?
if that's the case how do people port across different OS ie SE mini pro running eclair with an unofficial GB port? is it because the kernel remains the same?

cheezzzz said:
so does this mean to get a working ICS rom lets say aurora ICS which is derived from U8860, we need to rebuild our kernel that will function on our devices? because kernels are device specific right?
if that's the case how do people port across different OS ie SE mini pro running eclair with an unofficial GB port? is it because the kernel remains the same?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Correct me if I'm wrong....
Kernel need to build to work on specific device and specific android version, what ever kernel version is, that's so far what I know. Some drivers integrated in kernel, one of them is touch driver which related with touch panel hardware type.
To port rom from another device, we "just" pull the framework of the source rom and push it to the our android version which the framework will work. Of course with some additional "touch" to make it perfect.
To develop a rom from another device, not just port but we have to customize (made change and build from source) our device kernel to work with a destination android version. Also build from source for some libraries and drivers because of related things.
What things should be customize in kernel or libraries... well... I'm not a dev.

Owh I'm sorry mate,,actually I just looking for development team for Motorola,,they have development team focus on ICS build
Sorry if I mistake because I don't know much about this,,our device have many developers to port/make ROM and modified something
But so far I looked,,our device doesn't have development team like Triumph,,sorry if I wrong
I just want to know,how much important development team works/personal developer for ROM build
Cz I think it would be better if our device have development team
Once again mate,sorry if I wrong and asking fool
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2

Arya_3RDNumber said:
Owh I'm sorry mate,,actually I just looking for development team for Motorola,,they have development team focus on ICS build
Sorry if I mistake because I don't know much about this,,our device have many developers to port/make ROM and modified something
But so far I looked,,our device doesn't have development team like Triumph,,sorry if I wrong
I just want to know,how much important development team works/personal developer for ROM build
Cz I think it would be better if our device have development team
Once again mate,sorry if I wrong and asking fool
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're not asking fool... I agree with you if it will be great if we have devs team to work and focus on ICS... but we can't push devs, since they also have their real work in real world . But what we have now are Tj and ardX are still on the path of developing ICS for our device. So for now, they are already a team.

CacingKalung said:
You're not asking fool... I agree with you if it will be great if we have devs team to work and focus on ICS... but we can't push devs, since they also have their real work in real world . But what we have now are Tj and ardX are still on the path of developing ICS for our device. So for now, they are already a team.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes mate,,,absolutly great since I know some device with lower quality than our device got ICS ROM (Before using CSL,I'm Galaxy Ace user and I look at SGA forums,they have Both ICS AOSP&AOKP Build n some ICS ROM Ported)
It's mean if ICS running on our device,absolutly more perfects than the other device
Ardx said,,he still resync repo,,I also asking about this on andro-id forum
Bro Ardx was told me it's repo AOKP
It means he fully rebuild this ICS project,am I right?
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2

Arya (quite Indian Name) ... there is one team, what CK mention already who is working on ICS and that is of TJ and adrX, there is another team for our device, that is of ZUK and Whyzee, they worked together for many GB ROMS . May be after getting custom kernel for ICS from Napstar and after getting ICS ROM from adrX, they can port other ICS ROM too. Even elol may team up with them.
Also we can expect MIUI ICS from CK and FR. for FCKR software they already worked together ...

vivekb said:
Arya (quite Indian Name) ... there is one team, what CK mention already who is working on ICS and that is of TJ and adrX, there is another team for our device, that is of ZUK and Whyzee, they worked together for many GB ROMS . May be after getting custom kernel for ICS from Napstar and after getting ICS ROM from adrX, they can port other ICS ROM too. Even elol may team up with them.
Also we can expect MIUI ICS from CK and FR. for FCKR software they already worked together ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes mate,,,most important is "together",,I just want to know(sorry maybe I really2 fool) how much best dev team / personal dev.
Now I know althought we haven't real dev team,at least we have people who cares with they great works to develop our device,,
Sadly I can't doing anything to develop our device,,because I have many limitation mate,,maybe next time I just can be tester
Sent from my CSL-MI410 using Tapatalk 2

[Q] Camera on ics

hi all.
there are two ics roms for our galaxy mini,but the camera doesn't work in either of them,
in maclaw rom the camera libs are for galaxy gio;
can someone fix the libraries and allow us to use camera also on ics?
is it possible?

in maclaw beta7 also include libs for mini,fit..not only gio
meccaandroid said:
hi all.
there are two ics roms for our galaxy mini,but the camera doesn't work in either of them,
in maclaw rom the camera libs are for galaxy gio;
can someone fix the libraries and allow us to use camera also on ics?
is it possible?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
maclaw said camera prob on mini bcauze code or smethng similar..i dont remember.
i hve try put libs from gb to cm9..its also not working..easy way just wait maclaw fix that..

Camera issue is hard to solve, because it's need a libraries from ARM (or Qualcom), if you want they release libraries soon, read this thread and sign in the petition
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1663109

[Q] dual boot I9305

Hi all,
I've heard of the SiyahKernel for the I9300 which has dual boot functionality.
Does anybody know if this works on the I9305? Or is there a dual boot kernel available which is made for the I9305 in special?
Reason why I want to have dual boot:
I'm a huge Ubuntu fan. And what I've understood from what I've read is that it's CM(10?) based. So I'd like to use that as second rom. (I know, there isn't a version for the I9305 available right now, but I'll give it a try to port it from I9300 to the I9305.)
Thanks in advance.

As far as I was aware there is no dual boot yet for our device
Sent from my GT-I9305 using xda app-developers app

If their is then its in Development .
jje

Does it take much time to make a kernel which supports dual boot ?
Does anybody know how to port a kernel from I9300 to the I9305 ? Is it hard work to do that ?
And why does the 1GB extra and LTE support make such a difference for ROMS on the device ?
Thanks in advance.

Its not so much the difference as developers actually wanting to work on the phone . Nobody pays them its their choice what to develop . jje

tloader11 said:
Does it take much time to make a kernel which supports dual boot ?
Does anybody know how to port a kernel from I9300 to the I9305 ? Is it hard work to do that ?
And why does the 1GB extra and LTE support make such a difference for ROMS on the device ?
Thanks in advance.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1. Thats not REALLY hard, however you have to know what to do. Looking and comparing sources is good point to start. Take a look at gokhan or googy commits about dual boot for example.. Personally, I havent been interested in it, but I might look into it, why not
2. Apart from these, we have other radio, and that causes so much trouble with ROM differences..

Hbohd said:
1. Thats not REALLY hard, however you have to know what to do. Looking and comparing sources is good point to start. Take a look at gokhan or googy commits about dual boot for example.. Personally, I havent been interested in it, but I might look into it, why not
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool ! That would be awesome
Hbohd said:
2. Apart from these, we have other radio, and that causes so much trouble with ROM differences..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's cool that we have radio, but.... why do we need it ? seriously... we all have a mobile network subscription these days
Couldn't we just drop that in the beta/alpha versions, and add it in later then ? ;s

tloader11 said:
Cool ! That would be awesome
It's cool that we have radio, but.... why do we need it ? seriously... we all have a mobile network subscription these days
Couldn't we just drop that in the beta/alpha versions, and add it in later then ? ;s
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I mean, another radio, like baseband, ril etc. I wasn't talking about normal FM radio (we haven't even got one in i9305).
However, taking only these proper files (like ril + modem) from our ROMs and take them to i9300 ROMs might work, I tried some time ago doing same thing with temasek's cm10.1 and it worked.. Unfortunately I wasn't able to compile fully stable and well working kernel (based on temasek's sources) therefore I do not use it now ;p

Hbohd said:
I mean, another radio, like baseband, ril etc. I wasn't talking about normal FM radio (we haven't even got one in i9305).
However, taking only these proper files (like ril + modem) from our ROMs and take them to i9300 ROMs might work, I tried some time ago doing same thing with temasek's cm10.1 and it worked.. Unfortunately I wasn't able to compile fully stable and well working kernel (based on temasek's sources) therefore I do not use it now ;p
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ahh, stupid mistake >< sorry for that!
Would still be nice of you could look at the dual boot feature for our device !

Ported nexus 7 android l to tarb t210

i successflly ported it i will upload the rom 15hours from now
but people should help me get the rom booting becasue it is stucked at boot logo im new at roms please cooperate ill give full credits to people who helps :angel::angel:

THANK YOU!!! That's amazing!!

it will never gonna work
diffrent hardware
no compatible kernel

its not a port yet, since its not booting m8 :/
Verstuurd van mijn SM-G900F

safariking said:
it will never gonna work
diffrent hardware
no compatible kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You never know, it could.

hey
i dont know thats why im asking for help

i will upload this yet
i will upload this but i need to ask permission from gr8nole cause im using his nolekat for base rom

Congrats on getting a stock ROM partially working! Safariking, I think you should support this newbie and not just say it won't work. How did you think we got custom ROMs?

aaronjasper49 said:
i successflly ported it i will upload the rom 15hours from now
but people should help me get the rom booting becasue it is stucked at boot logo im new at roms please cooperate ill give full credits to people who helps :angel::angel:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well my advice is get use to logcats(google troubleshooting them, maybe even research a few ported manifactured roms to different devices and kernel porting will also be a big part of a build like this) , if you can get it to a working state these areas will be where most of the problems will be show whats conflicting, But without a kernel built/ported for the rom and hardware confliction issues your gonna have issues logcat may not be able to solve. Its not impossible but its far from easy porting from a different manifactured device but it does happen, htc roms have been brought to samsung for a few devices tho very few if any ever 100% function and it can be very time consuming for even a pro builder. would be nice for a custom factory rom from another branded device on our device!. I i wish you luck and will keep my fingers crossed and will check it out once its posted :good:

Lincoln99 said:
You never know, it could.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do know, it won't
Different screens, different SOCs, different everything. There is no way to get fully working. Ever.
LoopingCreeper said:
Congrats on getting a stock ROM partially working! Safariking, I think you should support this newbie and not just say it won't work. How did you think we got custom ROMs?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are talking about 2 completely different things here. Our custom Roms are stock based with some modifications. These are no ports.
Sent from my SM-T210 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app

Mm... I see what you mean.
Still, we could get a Nexus 7-like Lollipop ROM when Cyanogen releases CyanogenMod12. Or 13. Cannot remember.. :silly:

btw using a Touchwiz based rom to port a AOSP rom is completely useless that will never ever boot.
if you port something do it from a similair device with the same hardware and uif you port aosp you need a aosp base! if you port a touchwiz based rom use a touchwiz based rom Easy!

Mate not to crush your dream or effort but what the other devs are tell you if true including my self. Educated your self more, all the tutorials and guides regarding porting, building custom rom and more can be find on xda.
As for Lollipop we would have to wait till a compatible / similar device has it before it can be ported.
On that note hope that clear up some stuff for you and understand things better.

So the galaxy tab 2 has official support from cyanogenmod which I think it will be getting cm 12 which the device hardware and specs are not much different someone can port that over to our tab 3.
Or if the tab 4 gets official Samsung android l update you devs can port it to our tab 3??

aaronjasper49 said:
i successflly ported it i will upload the rom 15hours from now
but people should help me get the rom booting becasue it is stucked at boot logo im new at roms please cooperate ill give full credits to people who helps :angel::angel:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you replace the nexus 7 libs with the tab 3 7.0 libs? Found in /system/lib

DevMyAndroid said:
Did you replace the nexus 7 libs with the tab 3 7.0 libs? Found in /system/lib
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i forgot but i will look at the rom if i did
and i wont flash it because i dont have a data cable to reflash the stock rom i will probably start working on december

aaronjasper49 said:
i forgot but i will look at the rom if i did
and i wont flash it because i dont have a data cable to reflash the stock rom i will probably start working on december
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Upload the rom so i can check/replace the lib files

The only ROM that varies from stock is gr8nole's CM11 ROM. All other are touchwiz
If we had a stable CM ROM i feel this device would be very smooth and probably run some high end games smoothly

DevMyAndroid said:
Upload the rom so i can check/replace the lib files
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok i will edit this if can upload it

i dont think you need Gr8noles permission. just credit him in op for base rom.