[Q]Kernel 3.x - Galaxy Tab Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

I read this message:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=30139215&postcount=674
It's new kernel for Jelly bean... Kernel 3.x... I didn't understand difference between 2.x and 3.x... Which kernel is better? Especially for battery life...
And this new kernel is only for Jelly Bean? Or could I install on CM9 stable???
Thanks...

Mito125s said:
I read this message:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=30139215&postcount=674
It's new kernel for Jelly bean... Kernel 3.x... I didn't understand difference between 2.x and 3.x... Which kernel is better? Especially for battery life...
And this new kernel is only for Jelly Bean? Or could I install on CM9 stable???
Thanks...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In desktop environment, like Linux Ubuntu (Android is also a Linux), kernel 3 is being use long ago, but it's still in heavy development. The latest version is 3.5.

3.x is only rename 2. 6. 40, new stable kernel is relased in 60 - 80 days. .
Sent from my LG-P970 using xda app-developers app

No, Linux kernel 3.0 is not a rename of 2.6.40
I don't know where you get such info.
And yeah, android is using Linux kernel.
Sent from my GT-P1000 using xda app-developers app

Related

Kernel 2.6.35 port

From 4pda.com
Porting the kernel 2.6.35
Current status:
Works:
USB-Modem
Keyboard
Touchscreen
Backlighting
LCD backlight
Graphics - Full 3D hardware
Sound
Stick card
Internal memory
Headset
Poblemy with:
The system does not feel removing or inserting the stick
Pressing a button on the headset causes system to hang
The frequency and strength of the vibrator is not regulated
Aksilomer
Magnitomer
Luggage
WiFi
GSM
Not tested:
GPS
Bluetooth
Information
great, but too green
Do u mean Android 2.2
Sent from my GT540 using XDA App
mohnim said:
Do u mean Android 2.2
Sent from my GT540 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
kernel version != android version
aaa801 said:
kernel version != android version
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Looking at his question do you think he knows how to interpret '!='.....be a bit more clear
Sent from my GT540 using XDA App
sanmit said:
Looking at his question do you think he knows how to interpret '!='.....be a bit more clear
Sent from my GT540 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
kernel version is not equal to android version.
android 2.3 (gingerbread) from google is using 2.6.35 kernel version. but we can use 2.6.32 or 2.6.37 or other version.
so we can't say linux kernel 2.6.32 = android 2.2 (froyo)
ps: sorry, wrong quote
Sent from my Mi320
tj_style said:
kernel version is not equal to android version.
android 2.3 (gingerbread) from google is using 2.6.35 kernel version. but we can use 2.6.32 or 2.6.37 or other version.
so we can't say linux kernel 2.6.32 = android 2.2 (froyo)
ps: sorry, wrong quote
Sent from my Mi320
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
' != ' means not equal to.
Sent from my GT540 using XDA App
if being done by openswift but will probable be changed a bit for 2.3 aswell
sanmit said:
' != ' means not equal to.
Sent from my GT540 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats right, we have Android 2.2/2.3 running 2.6.29, and there native kernels are .32 (Froyo) and .35 (Gingerbread)
Jack
If the kernel is ported correly does that mean gingerbread Tom's would be Easter to port and have less problems?
not realy
it just means that some functions would work better and nativaly
such as wifi tethering
can you guide me or make a tut on the how to port 2.6.35 kernel? i am willing to port that kernel or feature of it on huawei u8230 which have already an unofficial kernel 2.6.32...thank you.
desalesouche said:
can you guide me or make a tut on the how to port 2.6.35 kernel? i am willing to port that kernel or feature of it on huawei u8230 which have already an unofficial kernel 2.6.32...thank you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please don't bump old threads.
You should search on XDAuniversity for a guide, or google it

Kernel

Im wondering why all the Android kernels are so old? For example: ive the newest Rom for the ace (thanks to wayland) but it just has a 2.6.y kernel. Even backtrack, blackbuntu or ue have old kernels (3.2.y-3.5.y) . So my question is : why does no one use the 3.7.y or 3.8 kernel ?
Sorry if this is a stupid question i dont know much about it
And sorry for bad english
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app
Wine tastes better the longer you keep it. Many of the kernels are unique in their own sense as well as stable. That's why we still use them !
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Our Ace has some hardware limitations and it is very difficult task to port 3.x kernel in our ace.
thanks so would it be possible to get kernel 3.8 rc2 to my backtrack?? cause wlan and eth drivers are not working for my lenovo ideapad y580 in the official kernel

Thunderzap Reloaded 4.1, Siri rc-4 or CoCore-E 3.9 ??

From all the recent experiences you guys have had, which one is the best, fastest and more stable kernel right now??
Sent from my GT-I9070 using Tapatalk
Odp: Thunderzap Reloaded 4.1 or CoCore-E 3.3 ??
Both were released today so its impossible to tell which one is better. Get Frapeti app and test both
Re: Thunderzap Reloaded 4.1 or CoCore-E 3.3 ??
Frankly I prefer CoCore-E 3.3 for performance.
But you can check both by universal kernel flasher and use as per your requirement.
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda premium
Re: Thunderzap Reloaded 4.1 or CoCore-E 3.3 ??
How to flash kernels
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda app-developers app
Re: Thunderzap Reloaded 4.1 or CoCore-E 3.3 ??
mannulko said:
How to flash kernels
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Download universal kernel flasher tool from xda and download any kernel you want to install.
Just select kernel flasher and press flash.
It will take only 5-10 seconds to flash.
Read tutorials before flashing.
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda premium
Re: Thunderzap Reloaded 4.1 or CoCore-E 3.3 ??
Im using Cocore-E 2.8 with chucky v6 rom and so far its the best combo ive used since upgrading to JB
Sent from my GT-I9070 using Tapatalk 2
AW: Thunderzap Reloaded 4.1 or CoCore-E 3.3 ??
I use cocore 2.9 nightly. Best balance battery and performance.
Testet cocore3.3 for two hours. 10% battery drain.
But this was my configuration. Feel free to test your own way.
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda app-developers app
Try them both and then decide.. There's no person that knows what you want better then yourself Besides, it aint going to hurt you
My PERSONAL preference goes to Cocore 3.3
Until next version of Siri Kernel comes out, i wanna really try it Then i'll see
Re: Thunderzap Reloaded 4.1 or CoCore-E 3.3 ??
I still didn't try CoCore E 3.3... I'm using ThunderZap 4.1 only because of TWRP
I will now give CoCore E 3.3 a try... as u people are telling that it results in much better performance!
Sent from my GT-I9070
CoCore-E 3.3 makes it better than Thunderzap 4.1 ( that suffers of lag)
---
Sorry for bad english
Re: Thunderzap Reloaded 4.1 or CoCore-E 3.3 ??
I dont know... I have experienced some lags on temple run 2 only after flashing cocore e 3.3.... this never happened on version 2.8...
Sent from my GT-I9070
Re: Thunderzap Reloaded 4.1 or CoCore-E 3.3 ??
I use thunderzap 4.1...
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda app-developers app
Re: Thunderzap Reloaded 4.1 or CoCore-E 3.3 ??
I use siri rc3 and tzkernel not good with cytus game. Touch point so slow:banghead:
Sent from my GT-I9070 using Tapatalk 2
I use SIRI rc3
Sami Kabir said:
I dont know... I have experienced some lags on temple run 2 only after flashing cocore e 3.3.... this never happened on version 2.8...
Sent from my GT-I9070
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Same here, with 2.8 never had lags, with 3.3 i've already had some, and some freezes (playing a video on mx player, it lagged so bad that i had to take the battery out to reboot the phone)
CoCore
CoCore 3.3 rulez. Tried all kernels, cocore is the best (Original Jelly Bean ROM)
Re: Thunderzap Reloaded 4.1, Siri rc-3 or CoCore-E 3.3 ??
Anyone tested CoCore E 3.9?
Cocore told that it increases battery life... but what about performance?
Sent using XDA Developer's app from an Android Device
Одг: Thunderzap Reloaded 4.1, Siri rc-3 or CoCore-E 3.3 ??
Sami Kabir said:
Anyone tested CoCore E 3.9?
Cocore told that it increases battery life... but what about performance?
Sent using XDA Developer's app from an Android Device
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is it soo hard to install and try it yourself?
Sent from Galaxy S Advance
Sami Kabir said:
Anyone tested CoCore E 3.9?
Cocore told that it increases battery life... but what about performance?
Sent using XDA Developer's app from an Android Device
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OMG! CoCOre told you!? how?? you have to teach us to talk to kernels!
I prefer cocore 3.3 (now testing 3.9)
i have been using thunderzep since 2.5 but it suffers much lag after some days of use (sometimes phone doesn't answered for minutes...) but now with cocore everything cool

[INFO]Which rom do you use on your mini

Purpose of this thread:
->Here you can post which rom you are currently using on your mini.
->You can even share your opininon about your favourite rom that you used on your mini It may help other members to know which rom is more popular for our mini
So let me start with the rom which i am using right now...
Touchwiz NatureUX v2 based on stock gb..
Smooth,fast,fluid
And my favourite rom is
-> New experience v9.9.1 rom by autoradio78
I request all other members to post which rom they are currently in
Oh yesterday i was ready to create a thread like that!II think thats a NOT best rom or comprarison thread so its ok.
My best rom is AOSP ics with no mods.
Yagami33 said:
think thats a NOT best rom or comprarison thread so its ok.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yagami33 said:
My best rom is AOSP ics with no mods.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry i just could not help it...
i am currently using cm9.2 by erikcas with no mods to scripts.i think that ics roms like cm9.2 or aosp and gb roms like stock-based or cm7 are best for mini since they are faster and smooth then cm10.1.
See signature
Phone: Samsung Galaxy Mini S5570
Android Version: 4.0.4
Rom: AOSP ICS Touchwiz v5 by A_U
Baseband: S5570XWKS2
Kernel: 2.6.37.6 Badass v1.9
Recovery: CWM v 4.0.0.5
Mods: Xposed Framework, Pure Audio, Mounts2SD, ODEX through universal odex script
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Gesendet von Tapatalk 4 beta
I am using andro-id....nothing beats stock....
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda premium
I use my custom build Mint OS (based on CM10 and CM10.1), no mods, no script + Badass Kernel.
My favourite ROM of all time is emanoN, the ROM saves my Mini from bootloops, soft brick and it's my first custom rom !
currently on my own modded stock xwktn .....was using cmt for a while....
F4uzan said:
I use my custom build Mint OS (based on CM10 and CM10.1), no mods, no script + Badass Kernel.
My favourite ROM of all time is emanoN, the ROM saves my Mini from bootloops, soft brick and it's my first custom rom !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My first one was official CM7.
BTW now I have FutureNext.
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda premium
hsay said:
currently on my own modded stock xwktn .....was using cmt for a while....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cmt??
Sent from my GT-S5670 using xda premium
goto c-modification.blogspot.com
Halo rom from jeeko was great
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda app-developers app
1)For 50+ apps i use stable CM7 with link2sd.
2)For best UI i use CM10.1 or 10.1 based roms.
3)Currently using Halo+Project(so far it is good for all low activity, heavy activity like multitaskin opening many apps will reboot)
Sent from my tass using xda.
Currently testing (looks promising)
AOSP 4.0.4 by Paul L.
Badass Kernel 1.9.2
PurePerformance 1.4
System odexed with Universal Odex Script
and using Link2SD
rghvdberg said:
Currently testing (looks promising)
AOSP 4.0.4 by Paul L.
Badass Kernel 1.9.2
PurePerformance 1.4
System odexed with Universal Odex Script
and using Link2SD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats a great combination
Btw can anyone suggest me a good stock based gb rom? Which one is the best?
Rajesh_m said:
Thats a great combination
Btw can anyone suggest me a good stock based gb rom? Which one is the best?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use New Experience Stock from autoradio
Sent from my GT-S5570
gustafivace said:
Use New Experience Stock from autoradio
Sent from my GT-S5570
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have tried it.. Really dont like the stock look any other suggestions? Anyone?
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda app-developers app
I use Minibean 2.0 by Spincervino
I think that is the best cm10.1 rom in galaxy mini with no bugs and problem.
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda app-developers app
48Rocky48 said:
I use Minibean 2.0 by Spincervino
I think that is the best cm10.1 rom in galaxy mini with no bugs and problem.
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its android 4.1.2 or 4.2.2???Benchmark scores?Please tell me because i want to try it thnx!
Yagami33 said:
Its android 4.1.2 or 4.2.2???Benchmark scores?Please tell me because i want to try it thnx!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its android 4.2.2 and for benchmark score I gonna post that in 10 hours( sleep)
But I installed 45+ app and no lag except for startup.
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda app-developers app

Which Kernel is the best for KitKat?

Hello. I tested many Roms and Kernels and i cant choose one. I'm using Cm11 but i think its kernel is slow. Semaphore? Mackay? CyanoCore? Meybe any other? Which Kernel you preffer?
kernel
I prefer Semaphore. Good kernel with many options, bigmem etc. CM 11 work fast on it.
I've used Mackay since... Well, a long time. The reason I prefer it over Semaphore is its capability to send MMS. I can't send them with Sema, though a good kernel it is otherwise.
Sent from my Nokia RinGo
Mackay. Latest version have CMA with 416mb RAM for users with 720p playback/record
how to enable 416MB?
ojojoj said:
how to enable 416MB?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Download the 0.607 mackay kernel version from here:
http://rootaxbox.no-ip.org/kasper_h/kernels/KK/
It is compatible with all roms based on cm :laugh:
dhidiy stock kernel with cma
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
which is the best app to control a i9000 kitkat kernel..?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
don2dare said:
which is the best app to control a i9000 kitkat kernel..?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
look at the apps listed in
[POLL][FAQ][Discussion] Kit Kat 4.4 / CM 11 for Galaxy S & S Plus [i9000][i9001] under 19000 current development , just test them, they are free in play store
Check this out! Links to useful Guides and " Banned " Documentaries ​
Mackay 0.608 with KK bigmem libs
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
baciany said:
Hello. I tested many Roms and Kernels and i cant choose one. I'm using Cm11 but i think its kernel is slow. Semaphore? Mackay? CyanoCore? Meybe any other? Which Kernel you preffer?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I recommend u Mackay Kernel 0.607 works best on CM11
Go for it
Read rules.There's no best kernel/rom.Test and see which fits you best.

Categories

Resources