Hi there!
I'm new to the Optimus 2x rom stuff. I used a Galaxy Spica before, which I rooted and installed some nice roms on.
On my LG it seems that the custom-roms I chose so far make no difference in speed compared to the stock rom.
Quadrantscore: ~2200 with WIUI 2.5.25 Stable (GB) and ETaNa STOCK_LITE 2.6.32 which is (according to Quadrant) below the O2X.
In some rom-threads I see scores of about 4000-6000 how do I reach that? Did I do something wrong?
greetings, and thanks for your tips
reijin
//PS.: I'm aware, that those scores are not a prefect representation of how the overall experience with a Rom is, but I'd like to know. At least the new Rom feels way better then the original stock rom.
Yeah it's a bit strange. I'm using cm7 on mine, the general performance is really nice and fast no complaints from me but running quadrant benchmark I get scores of around 2200-2300. My friends o2x hits scores closer to 3000 on the same rom. Both using temasek's kernel too.
Sent from my MB860 using xda app-developers app
I only have experience with ICS ROMs and kernels, but I can testify I've consistently had quadrant scores >4000. It's a complicated mix of the hardware you have (no two o2x's are the same), whether your kernel allows overclock, how optimized the io is, etc.
Sent from my LG-SU660 using xda premium
try to use antutu benchmark and see your score. and you're using stock lite which is 1.0ghz the clock. if you want to get higher score try HOC lite, and use OC/UV programs to control your clock cpu. i use pimp my cpu profile i set:
- daily freq: 216-1015MHZ.
- bench freq (like antutu,quardrant, necore, vellamo, and so on): 216-1418MHZ.
- and so on, what ever profile you want
You used spica and you don't know this basics?
Spica's angry anboys can tell you.
I can say that high quadrant scores can be resulted when IO rate is very high. You can cheat quadrant at it will think IO rate is high but it won't make phone a formula 1.
Use app2ad or something that uses ext partition and then run quadrant.
I am afraid y used spica and didn't know it.
Sent from LG 2X using Tapatalk 3 Beta
With CM9 Harsh kernel i have in Quadrant 3200 points
Related
Hi guys!
can you post your SGS configuration and tell us how do you score with Quadrant Benchmark?
mine is that:
SGS i9000m
kernel speedmod 13c - rom ZeroGingerMIUI with no OC Lagfix ---> 1800
kernel speedmod 13c - rom ZeroGingerMIUI with 1.2ghz OC Lagfix---> 2100
kernel super optimized - rom ZeroGingerMIUI with 1.2ghz OC Lagfix--->2350
kernel hacked Supercurio for GingerBread - rom Ultibread v1.4 Lagfix(no system) --->2000
yes, i'm a bench_maniac!
Stock I9000 XXJVK --> ~awesome scoreon my user experience benchmark.
Awesome... no words to describe!
Quadrant doesn't reflect real life performance at all. I used to get 2200+ with a lagfix on 2.1 but it was no where close to the real life performance of what I experience now on 2.3.3 JVK with no lagfix where Quadrant score is just 1020 .
Nice
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
quadrant doesn't reflect the actual user performance/experience because in the past i've had high quadrant scores but poor user experience.
but as the versions change (i.e eclair>froyo>gingerbread) i get lower scores but better user performance.
Agree my user experience benchmark is also off the scale .
Quadrant crap as always .
Why dont you post all these benchmark quadrant posts in the same place if you want to compare size.
jje
1200 on miui
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Mine is scoring "awesome" too in user experience!
I personally think this thread should be removed I'm afraid.. For starters, there are a billion other quadrant threads, and nobody has F***king bothered, as mentioned to collate the values into a table. Also, nothing is worse than breeding a culture of people who believe that Quadrant accurately measures the mobile performance for all workloads.
Auzy said:
I personally think this thread should be removed I'm afraid.. For starters, there are a billion other quadrant threads, and nobody has F***king bothered, as mentioned to collate the values into a table. Also, nothing is worse than breeding a culture of people who believe that Quadrant accurately measures the mobile performance for all workloads.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree with Ausy that this kind of thread is not of much practical use. I run Quadrant weekly, but only to compare my phone to itself as a diagnostic. If the Q score changes radically, I try to find out why. I also use it to compare ROMs.
However, I don't see that the benchmark scores of two different phones will tell you anything of much value when you compare them.
Hello
I recently acquired a nook color and i am going to install cynogen mod 7.1 and google apps from clock work recovery method, but i want to overclcok to 1.2 or 1.3 ghz, i understand that cynogen mod has an overclock facility built in, the part i am not sure about is to reach 1.2 ghz or 1.3 ghz do i have to use dalingrin overclock kernel to achieve these speeds, or is it possible in cynogen mod 7.1 without the kernel.
Any info would be appreciated.
Regards
Mark
Dal's kernel has been included in there for a while now. If you use 7.1 stable to later nighlies you are definitely safe.
ok, thats great, thanks for the reply, appreciated.
Regards
Mark
It appears the GPU may run best at 1200, even thou the CPU can do up to 1300.
It certainly seems to be true that going past 1200 can slow down graphic intensive operations. I am guessing that's probably because the graphics processor has to run at a ratio of the CPU and going past 1200 ends up with a lower graphics frequency.
But depending on the type of applications used there can be benefit in going higher and most Nooks seem to be capable of 1350. This can be seen in two different benchmarks. Quadrant gives significantly higher scores at 1350 than 1200 whilst the graphically more intensive Nenamark is slower at 1350 then 1200.
I ended up using 1200 anyway as it feels fast and probably also helps with battery life.
Check the voltage settings as well as these can normally be lowered a bit to help again with battery life. I use the one's originally quoted by Dal and don't have any stability issues. ( 09.25 / 1.05 / 1.2 / 1.275 / 1.325)
I did a comparison of 1200 and 1350 MHz with the Sunspider JavaScript bench. 1350 is faster but frankly I have a hard time telling the difference between even stock clock and 1350 in actual practical usage.
The most obvious speed boost I've found is running 16bit color. Big difference in browser scrolling performance.
Is overclocking it fully safe?
GuTsaV said:
Is overclocking it fully safe?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From the standpoint that breathing in a metropolitan area is not fully safe, no it is not.
I use the stepper built-in to 7.1 stable and have never given it a second thought.
Try nook color tweaks.
Sent from my [R3] BLURR3D DROID BIONIC using XDA App.
GuTsaV said:
Is overclocking it fully safe?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have run at 1200 / 1350 for the last 4 months and it has been stable and I have not seen any real detectable difference in battery performance or in how warm the device gets. The governor means that a lot of the time the Nook is running at lower clock speed anyway.
I don't recollect seeing any reports of damage on this forum to the Nook through over-clocking. Increasing voltages from the stock values on the other hand is probably not a good idea. There may possibly be longer term effects from overclocking but I'd guess the effect on lifetime is small enough that most people will have changed their device before it is significant.
GuTsaV said:
Is overclocking it fully safe?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Being that Nooks CPU is underclocked by default. It is very safe.
---------------------------------
Sent from my LG Optimus V using Tapatalk
Hey guys,
Posted under general questions and to my surprise not one reply in a week. So, I'm curious to know somethings about overclocking these tablets. What settings are you using? Have you had any issues with overheating and shutting down?What settings are recommended for web browsing, gaming etc? Let's talk linpack and benchmark testing. Where do you rank and how did you get there? Let's talk SetCPU benchmark scores, what kind of results can you squeeze out out of your device? How does someone pull off 41916.7 MFLOPS?! (Nexus) I'll start......
GT-7310 Running 3.2 / Motley Kernal / SetCPU
SetCPU Scores
Long Bench @ 178ms / Native @ 621.5ms
Linpack Scores
Single thread @ 42.4 MFLOPS / Multi thread @ 83.2 MFLOPS
Obtained running 1504MHz max / 216MHz min
Note: I have overheated and shutdown at 1504 web browsing. At 1400MHz I have had no issues. I see some scores are through the roof. I'm not to familiar with Overclocking and just would like to hear what you guys have to say. Thanks in advance. I may of posted this in the wrong area and I apologize. I would like this to be a thread on the topic rather than a Q & A.
Well I personally run my tab @1200Mhz with -25mV on the 1000&1200 steps, but anyhow, due to the interactive governor the most used setps are 216, 456 and 1200. I don't undervolt the lower test for stability reasons as I mostly work on the tablet so I don't want to test yet how low uV can go, don't have the time to test it right now. (Even though I'm pretty sure -25mV even on lower steps is still largely stable)
As for the set CPU test I tried them out on 1504Mhz: 150 and 595ms. I once pushed the tab to 1600Mhz but it ended up in an immediate freeze so I will skip on trying that again.
I don't have linpack but tried running GLBench 2.1 Egypt and the score was pretty embarrasing
Thanks for sharing. Since my post I have flashed aokp-34 galaxiansoup with v-3 of the Motley Kernal. Running 1400 on 216 no undervolting and am seeing a tiny increase in numbers. I'm still stumped on these linpack scores. This thing runs great. No complaints whatsoever. Anyone want to chime in on the best bench testing app or what the stock numbers on these 7310's are?
everyone will tell you that benchmark scores aren't very representative!
run the test 5 times and each time you will get a slightly different score.
i don't really care about benchmarking, as long as i feel that my tab runs smooth (which i think it does) im pretty happy. im normally at 1,4ghz and everything is smooth and stable!
Thanks for sharing. I couldn't agree more. My tab runs great at the same speed settings as yours. I just don't understand the numbers and how certain device's have like 100 times my mflops......I'm a numbers guy by nature, I like to see it on paper....but I am content with my device. Just always looking to make it cleaner and faster.....you know the addiction I'm sure.
Are you happy with this kernel? I found it stuttering and laggy...
zooster said:
Are you happy with this kernel? I found it stuttering and laggy...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I've not ran into any issues. Totally impressed and content with v3 motley. If there is a better kernel out there I'd love to hear about. I have yet to look, no need.
Been running a few custom profiles via Setcpu peaking @1.5GHz on B37 for a few weeks now. Other than a force close or two and an occasional browser freeze, which is normal with these roms, this thing is running pretty snappy. Gotta watch the temp though.
Sent from my GT-P7310 using xda premium
I sure hope that you've set up your profiles so that your tab overclocks to 1.5Ghz only occasionally, it's a thing that you HW can handle it, but will it on the long term?
Also, I regret that you can't overclock the bus frequency to get an overall performance boost (the GPU could really use it..) as on the Galaxy S
Yeah, I'm only pushing 1.5 on occasion, per profile. I normally run 1.4 all day everyday for the last 3 months with heavy use and no issues. Just gotta watch the temp. I've had mine to 113 degrees which kinda scared me.
Sent from my GT-P7310 using xda premium
Hi there!
I'm have been trying several different ROMS and tweaks to improve my general AnTuTu Score. Although I have a general idea what affects what score there's still one mystery to me - the 3D score.
I've been getting values from 1.000 to sometimes 1.800 and everything in between those two.
I can't seem to get consistent values here. I got the highest values on CM 10 stable (something like 1.900 3D score, up to 9 FPS in the "ogre fighting" benchmark part) and now on JB 4.2.1 (Fishears and CyanAOSP 0.7.5 and 0.6.5) the highest I got was 1.600 with 7 FPS max at the ogre fighting scene.
It's just mind boggling that I cant seem to find out how to raise this score.
Does anyone know WHAT exactly affects this score? I mean which tweaks do you guys run to improve this? Does the 3D score fluctuate as much for others too?
AW: [Q] How can you affect the AnTuTu 3D Score?
My values are from 1400 to 2200 and i have also no idea why.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using xda app-developers app
It's kinda strange that no one seems to know... ;D
But it seems that Live OC as in Semaphore or Devil Kernel speeds up GPU too and therefore increases the 3D score too. (as opposed to normal OC of just the CPU)
Hey, i think i have a big problem.
Im using a new ROM (this one http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2622069) and i changed my Max CPU freq to 729Mhz and Min freq. to 122Mhz using ONDEMAND. So i decided to run a benchmark test using Quadrant Standard Edition and i got around 800 points i was kinda shocked because i saw many screenshots from other Mini Users with 2000+ points using an old ROM in this post -> http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1437030.
I dont know what i have done to get so low score, i only have facebook and skype installed and greenify. I think my phone is faster then before but with this Benchmark Score i think my phone is in a pretty bad condition
Any suggestion?
erasem said:
Hey, i think i have a big problem.
Im using a new ROM (this one http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2622069) and i changed my Max CPU freq to 729Mhz and Min freq. to 122Mhz using ONDEMAND. So i decided to run a benchmark test using Quadrant Standard Edition and i got around 800 points i was kinda shocked because i saw many screenshots from other Mini Users with 2000+ points using an old ROM in this post -> http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1437030.
I dont know what i have done to get so low score, i only have facebook and skype installed and greenify. I think my phone is faster then before but with this Benchmark Score i think my phone is in a pretty bad condition
Any suggestion?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, what you're running is a Jelly Bean, which is NOT officially supported by Galaxy Mini's hardware.
Also, if you think your phone is already fast, then DON'T believe benchmark. I never choose benchmark for testing phone's smoothness, instead I use the ROM around 1 week, then see how does it responds. If it's faster, then I would say the ROM is good.