Guys port the cyanogen mod 9 Galaxy Y.
Here's a link to a topic.
The original rom is REALLY BUGGY itself...How do you suppose a port will do anything good? A port will add even more bugs to the build.So much that it would become unusable.Not trying to discourage you or anything. Just stating ...
Insert witty sentence here
it would be safer it we tried to port CM9 ourself
shadowsiul said:
it would be safer it we tried to port CM9 ourself
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont hink it wil b possible as cm7 is still miles away frm gettin onto our fones. GPU sources r also nt yet out(fu***** brodcom).
Theres a mini cm9 for the international gt s5830. And works really good. Almost no bugs as i installed it on my gf's ace
Maybe that one would be the right one to port.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
sebarg said:
Theres a mini cm9 for the international gt s5830. And works really good. Almost no bugs as i installed it on my gf's ace
Maybe that one would be the right one to port.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
5830 hv different board. Even GPU.
sebarg said:
Theres a mini cm9 for the international gt s5830. And works really good. Almost no bugs as i installed it on my gf's ace
Maybe that one would be the right one to port.
Sent from my GT-I9100 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
S5830I = Galaxy Young, but looks like Galaxy Ace S5830
S5830 =/= S5830I except for the look
at least it starts? what would need to change it to at least boot? I do not care problems, she boot is a start.
yoto111 said:
at least it starts? what would need to change it to at least boot? I do not care problems, she boot is a start.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't understand most of what devs do. I do understand some pieces of code, I know how to do some basic theming, and I can use search engines.
I also know that "she boot" is not a start. Why? Read post#2. It's written by a dev who actually knows more than your "at least it starts?" questions. We already have a CM7.2 that "she boot", but it's very buggy, and not for daily use. If you want it, and "do not care problems, she boot is a start", google it.
EDIT: Oh, forgot to mention why the "she boot" CM7.2 is full of bugs. It's ported from the Galaxy Y as well and even tho "at least it starts" the most crucial features don't work.
GermainZ said:
I don't understand most of what devs do. I do understand some pieces of code, I know how to do some basic theming, and I can use search engines.
I also know that "she boot" is not a start. Why? Read post#2. It's written by a dev who actually knows more than your "at least it starts?" questions. We already have a CM7.2 that "she boot", but it's very buggy, and not for daily use. If you want it, and "do not care problems, she boot is a start", google it.
EDIT: Oh, forgot to mention why the "she boot" CM7.2 is full of bugs. It's ported from the Galaxy Y as well and even tho "at least it starts" the most crucial features don't work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh I understand this is not exactly "a beginning" significant, but for me it is. I asked this question because I have not had time to test, but if any of you tested could say, so I asked the question. If at least boot, it means a lot to me, I'm already anxious for ace ics running on and can not wait for that to happen.
I understand little about ports, I read a lot but never tried that already do not use linux and do not have time for this, but sorry if you enterpretou bad what i said, it was not the intention.
yoto111 said:
oh I understand this is not exactly "a beginning" significant, but for me it is. I asked this question because I have not had time to test, but if any of you tested could say, so I asked the question. If at least boot, it means a lot to me, I'm already anxious for ace ics running on and can not wait for that to happen.
I understand little about ports, I read a lot but never tried that already do not use linux and do not have time for this, but sorry if you enterpretou bad what i said, it was not the intention.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM7.2 exists and is bootable on the S5830I. Try it if you want. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1770498
GermainZ said:
CM7.2 exists and is bootable on the S5830I. Try it if you want. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1770498
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so the cm7.2 came to our phone I installed it. I already know all the bugs, and also follow the topic seeing all fixes. But what i really hope is CM9, at least a version of it bootable.
yoto111 said:
so the cm7.2 came to our phone I installed it. I already know all the bugs, and also follow the topic seeing all fixes. But what i really hope is CM9, at least a version of it bootable.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The ROM in the OP will brick the S5830I if installed, so no one can test it unless it's ported, which is useless because:
1- It will even more buggy
2- CM9, even if ported correctly, will be extremely laggy, because the full GPU sources for the S5830I aren't available.
3- CM7 isn't ready yet. CM9 only requires more work.
Dude this is lyk imposible yet v dont have cm7,cm9 is far to go
N other thing is that this cm9 from wich ur portnng is itself bugly its useless to port a rom with bugs !!
rajrocks said:
Dude this is lyk imposible yet v dont have cm7,cm9 is far to go
N other thing is that this cm9 from wich ur portnng is itself bugly its useless to port a rom with bugs !!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that true but in theory could we use MaclawStudios/icsgalaxy source to build? i know that i am asking stupid question but i mean there are alot of these question out there.
shadowsiul said:
that true but in theory could we use MaclawStudios/icsgalaxy source to build? i know that i am asking stupid question but i mean there are alot of these question out there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ever read about the differances between S5830 and S5830i ? well Original device have Adreno200 which it has source code released and S5830i have Videocore IV that is made by broadcom even tho broadcom agreed to share some of its device's source code they denied to release VC IV's code without HW Acceleration its an piece of crap with 1ghz(with rafael's latest kernel) cpu and 300mb ram even Galaxy Y is better than this device because there are some ports that already getting done its cheaper if we compare this device to that...
GermainZ said:
The ROM in the OP will brick the S5830I if installed, so no one can test it unless it's ported, which is useless because:
1- It will even more buggy
2- CM9, even if ported correctly, will be extremely laggy, because the full GPU sources for the S5830I aren't available.
3- CM7 isn't ready yet. CM9 only requires more work.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have installed it with ClockworkMod Recovery V5.0.2.6 and it works fine, however, after booting it is stuck at "Updating Android - Starting apps".
But, IT WORKS !!!!!!
RubenStauttener said:
I have installed it with ClockworkMod Recovery V5.0.2.6 and it works fine, however, after booting it is stuck at "Updating Android - Starting apps".
But, IT WORKS !!!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You installed an unported Galaxy Y ROM on your phone and it worked? That's dumb. And I'm surprised it booted.
GermainZ said:
You installed an unported Galaxy Y ROM on your phone and it worked? That's dumb. And I'm surprised it booted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, me too, but actually it doesn't works, I only get/it's now stuck at an orange circle, witch can be moved with your finger like a laptop touchpad (after booting (without/no boot animation)).
Sent from my GT-S5830i using xda premium
RubenStauttener said:
Yeah, me too, but actually it doesn't works, I only get/it's now stuck at an orange circle, witch can be moved with your finger like a laptop touchpad (after booting (without/no boot animation)).
Sent from my GT-S5830i using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cool. Have fun with your new "Move the orange circle!" game
By the way, you seriously shouldn't flash Galaxy Y ROMs. Your keys may end up not getting recognized (in other words: no recovery/download mode for you anymore).
Related
Hello all,
The exams are coming. I have not acces to my computer anymore. So, the dev is suspend. You must to wait until 22 december. Sorry
This a port from the Hero with Android 4.0. But no touchscreen
So if anyone can help me, it will be very nice That's my "first" version.
THIS IS A ALPHA VERSION ! IF YOU WANT A BETA OR STABLE RELEASE, PLEASE WAIT !
Problems
Everything...
Working
- Calls
- Touchscreen
Thanks to
KeiranFTW for his kernel, Thank YOU !!!
I need some developers that want to help me, I have not much time anymore (school)
Downloads
Alpha 4:
http://vanweereld.be/buzz/buzz_vwmodbuild4_signed.zip
Alpha 2:
http://vanweereld.be/buzz/buzz_icsbuild2_signed.zip
Alpha 1:
http://vanweereld.be/buzz/ics.zip
If I forgot to say anything, ask it
Karting06
PS: Sorry for my bad english :/
Sooo fast.
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using xda premium
I hope arco68 can help us
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using xda premium
Did you fix anything or is this just an emulator dump?
It cann't boot, so I can fix anything.
First, I must to get it boot !
Karting06 said:
Hello all,
This a port from the SDK of Android (R14) with Android 4.0. But he doesn't boot...
So if anyone can help me, it will be very nice That's my "first" version.
Problems
Doesn't boot... He reboot everytime.
Downloads
First version
If I forgot to say anything, ask it
Karting06
PS: Sorry for my bad english :/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i will have a look at it and see if i can get it too boot up mate. give me 20mins and ill either come back with a logcat or with suggestions okayif i get it booted ill upload to you then you can re-upload it top your link mate
Okay ! Thanks for your help.
But now, I must to go sleeping, I will see it tomorrow !
Thank you
Karting06 said:
Okay ! Thanks for your help.
But now, I must to go sleeping, I will see it tomorrow !
Thank you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
u never put a bootimg with it thats why it not booting i have added boot img and waiting for it to flash now ill post results
Will take a look at your version!
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using XDA App
Paul1989 said:
u never put a bootimg with it thats why it not booting i have added boot img and waiting for it to flash now ill post results
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
waiting!!
Sounds interesting. Can't to here the results
I don't think this will work there seems to too much missing
[sito_web] said:
waiting!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nah I've tried all I can nothing's working and no1 here has boot img for 4.0 yet
i looked at android sdk, seems they not support v6 processor jet,
rolks said:
i looked at android sdk, seems they not support v6 processor jet,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just like gingerbread. The support was added later by HCDR.Jacob and other CM members.
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using XDA App
ZooMas said:
Just like gingerbread. The support was added later by HCDR.Jacob and other CM members.
Sent from my HTC Wildfire using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh ;(
Can Arco help us ? I will ask it in PM.
Please, don't say something as "waiting" (everyone wait...)
This will boot up and it will work.... BUT we will never be able to get it stable. we couldnt even get android 3.0 stable let alone 4.0. its just not possible. why would everyone want a slow ass arm6 wildfire. if you want 4.0 buy a arm7 device with faster processor. will boot like i said and will work but the lag on it wud be extream and not to mention there are NO dev's working on 3.0 so my opinion is they will turn their noses up at that aswell
NO OFFENCE INTENDED JUST BEING HONIST WITH YOU ALL
The emulator image is compiled for ARMv7, so it won't boot on this device no matter what. I'd rather wait for the actual sources, than wasting time on a dead end.
It's not even certain yet that ICS will be able to run properly on the Wildfire. There's been some talk about dropping support for low memory and non-GPU devices in CM9. It really depends on how GPU/memory intensive ICS will be. We'll know more when sources are released.
arco68 said:
The emulator image is compiled for ARMv7, so it won't boot on this device no matter what. I'd rather wait for the actual sources, than wasting time on a dead end.
It's not even certain yet that ICS will be able to run properly on the Wildfire. There's been some talk about dropping support for low memory and non-GPU devices in CM9. It really depends on how GPU/memory intensive ICS will be. We'll know more when sources are released.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have seen that.
So we must to wait !
arco68 said:
It's not even certain yet that ICS will be able to run properly on the Wildfire. There's been some talk about dropping support for low memory and non-GPU devices in CM9. It really depends on how GPU/memory intensive ICS will be. We'll know more when sources are released.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's such a downer. Well, I guess the writing's on the wall finally for this device. :|
i want to do a root & CWM for my SGM
also i want to install CM9
but i really don't know how...
and need all this things for this week...
can you help me please? (step by step)
read.. read.. and read.. all of these things can be found here..
YehiamBenShushan said:
i want to do a root & CWM for my SGM
also i want to install CM9
but i really don't know how...
and need all this things for this week...
can you help me please? (step by step)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
go to this thread and read the guide section there are also links for video tutorials if possible read the full thread http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1443907
can you give me (please) link for the most updated CWM ?
YehiamBenShushan said:
can you give me (please) link for the most updated CWM ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here u go...cwm touch recovery,read the instructions on the post...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1529863
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda premium
elixdragon said:
Here u go...cwm touch recovery,read the instructions on the post...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1529863
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if i have SGM i need to download.. "cwm-touch-5.0.2.8-mini.tar.md5"
or the standard one ?
BTW..
you have skype ?
can you help me on skype ?
YehiamBenShushan said:
if i have SGM i need to download.. "cwm-touch-5.0.2.8-mini.tar.md5"
or the standard one ?
BTW..
you have skype ?
can you help me on skype ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea...go for the latest one n yea i hv skype
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda premium
First you need to install CWM Recovery from here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1529863
Second you need to download CM9 from here:
http://galaxyics.com (Click DOWNLOAD, scroll down and click on Select below the Mini picture, then click on Releases, then click Download)
Then flash it through CWM.
You might know this already, but if you really want to install CM9 in a SGM, you need to have in mind that CM9 in SMG is not stable (yet). For example, if you want to install the CM9 of Squadzone, you should really read these two links:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=20495725&postcount=225
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=20703957&postcount=286
Of course, there are other versions of CM9 for Samsung Galaxy mini in the Dev. Forums, but I didn't try them.
About the CWM, I use the v4, because at the first time when I wanted to install CyanogenMod, the CWM v5 didn't install the ROM correctly (never passed from the bootscreen "android"). And the Backup/restore in CWM v5 didn't work it (at least in my Galaxy Mini). But the Restore function worked perfectly in CWM v4 and, until now, I hadn't problems installing other ROMs in my SGM.
I really recommend (for now) use CM7 RC 5.6 or (RC 5.3 - the one that I'm using it now). If you want CM9 only for the ICS Appearance, you can install a ICS theme with "Theme Chooser" from CM. There's also an ICS Launcher that works good.
Just Saying~
you need to have in mind that CM9 in SMG is not stable (yet)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From that link in my previous post I installed CM9 on my SGM and it is very usable to me.
I'm not using it constantly because it lacks some features that I found, and I'm used to, on squad's CM7, for example. But it's very good.
felipevsw said:
From that link in my previous post I installed CM9 on my SGM and it is very usable to me.
I'm not using it constantly because it lacks some features that I found, and I'm used to, on squad's CM7, for example. But it's very good.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice! which CPU governor did you use and with what Min and Max frequency? How did you do with the laggy visual effect? right now, would you prefer CM9 more than CM7 from squad's? I'm asking all these questions because I want to have CM9 in my SGM but somehow, the first and second time I installed that CM9 I went back to my CM7.2 RC 5.3 backup xD
Harp_River said:
Nice! which CPU governor did you use and with what Min and Max frequency? How did you do with the laggy visual effect? right now, would you prefer CM9 more than CM7 from squad's? I'm asking all these questions because I want to have CM9 in my SGM but somehow, the first and second time I installed that CM9 I went back to my CM7.2 RC 5.3 backup xD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I always use as Governor lilgV2 (or SmartassV2 when present) and I/O noop. On that ROM the laggy visual effect is hardly noticed, try it!
As I said before: I'm not using CM9 (yet) because it lacks some features that squad's CM7 has. But if you are not used to them, you will not note any difference.
You should try it and see for yourself.
Regarding CM9 Beta4, just read the thread in this section and the entire thread in the dev section before you fiddle with it and decide if it's worth it for you.
There's a lot of fiddling and some things are somewhat working while others, like camera, are just not working at all.
IMO, it's not for daily use and won't be for a long time but if you have a spare mini, give it a try and help with the development and bug reporting.
felipevsw said:
I always use as Governor lilgV2 (or SmartassV2 when present) and I/O noop. On that ROM the laggy visual effect is hardly noticed, try it!
As I said before: I'm not using CM9 (yet) because it lacks some features that squad's CM7 has. But if you are not used to them, you will not note any difference.
You should try it and see for yourself.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
haha maybe that's the reason. I'm also used to the features of squad's CM7. But I will try it again and see the results with your advices
Sent from my GT-S5570 using XDA
Jinxxed said:
Regarding CM9 Beta4, just read the thread in this section and the entire thread in the dev section before you fiddle with it and decide if it's worth it for you.
There's a lot of fiddling and some things are somewhat working while others, like camera, are just not working at all.
IMO, it's not for daily use and won't be for a long time but if you have a spare mini, give it a try and help with the development and bug reporting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's very right! I forgot to mention because I rarely use my phones' camera... But fot phone-like uses like SMS and calls it's ok. And smartphone uses like browse web, facebook app, gmail, maps, it's fine too.
Follow as per the steps given
The instructions are very clear to understand. You will not have any problem, if you follow all the instructions.
http://madteam.co/forum/general-77/(dev's)(broadcom)-open-dialogue-with-broadcom/
possible source for the gpu in the near future?
Possible cm7 in future
Open source will be never released,maybe new drivers
Well since broadcom is looking into the rom of the Y or Ace (not sure which one, because the topic was about ace, but was posted in Y Section) It is probably going to have full CPU and GPU Drivers
Qnrx said:
Well since broadcom is looking into the rom of the Y or Ace (not sure which one, because the topic was about ace, but was posted in Y Section) It is probably going to have full CPU and GPU Drivers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well let's hope so, so we can get CM7.2 on this baby? Also the broadcom guy just posted a new reply to that topic.
Any developers from here care to go over and offer what info they can to help speed this along or whatnot? He asks about the "Y" in his latest reply, if the sources are released will the devs be able to use them for CM7.2 for our S5380i?
Hi paradoxiumwind
you have to read a little more of Galaxy Ace "S5830" S5830 Young Galaxy and have the same CPU, same GPU, videocam IV .. totally the same drivers, the only thing that has more Galaxy Ace S5830 is a flash and other veicina screen 320 x 480 pixels, 3.5 inches ... I use Ace S5830 And talking with Broadcom to release some of the drivers that are essential, Broadcom seeks solutions to dismiss some of the drier gpu, to Mogo to create CyanogenMod, AOKP, AOSP ... and I understand for a lot more applications ... A full drivers for the GPU will come out a little later...
My nick on this forum is: AmirChe
Harley--TSI said:
Hi paradoxiumwind
you have to read a little more of Galaxy Ace "S5830" S5830 Young Galaxy and have the same CPU, same GPU, videocam IV .. totally the same drivers, the only thing that has more Galaxy Ace S5830 is a flash and other veicina screen 320 x 480 pixels, 3.5 inches ... I use Ace S5830 And talking with Broadcom to release some of the drivers that are essential, Broadcom seeks solutions to dismiss some of the drier gpu, to Mogo to create CyanogenMod, AOKP, AOSP ... and I understand for a lot more applications ... A full drivers for the GPU will come out a little later...
My nick on this forum is: AmirChe
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the explaination, so since they're basically the same hardware when they release the source for the "Y", we (I mean the devs) can use it for our i to get CM7.2?
paradoxiumwind said:
Thanks for the explaination, so since they're basically the same hardware when they release the source for the "Y", we (I mean the devs) can use it for our i to get CM7.2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes.
Yes, I think they will only need to be replaced LCS Density from 120 to 160. or in the extreme case, to update and to add some more oddatak .. The whole system is done everything works great, but we can not be installing, means You can not get to the entrance, squardzone tested and missing his only got one driver ... look at the dialogue I think there you have everything else you need
will we able to see ICS or JB?
now a question... I know, is too soon, but, will we be able to see Ice Cream Sandwich or Jelly Bean in our loved devices? I'd like to help...
gabboman said:
now a question... I know, is too soon, but, will we be able to see Ice Cream Sandwich or Jelly Bean in our loved devices? I'd like to help...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sure, but they will run like ass? Our phones are not powerful. I will be happy with CM7.2
paradoxiumwind said:
Sure, but they will run like ass? Our phones are not powerful. I will be happy with CM7.2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cm9 & cm10 works perfectly on 5830. I hv used it. No lags. Then y do u say it wont work on this fone?
Sent from my GT-S5830i using xda premium
domnic79 said:
Cm9 & cm10 works perfectly on 5830. I hv used it. No lags. Then y do u say it wont work on this fone?
Sent from my GT-S5830i using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And on paper our Gpu is powerful..If it works well then cm7 should be the first step.
Sent from my GALAXY ACE on Ace cream v1.2
domnic79 said:
Cm9 & cm10 works perfectly on 5830. I hv used it. No lags. Then y do u say it wont work on this fone?
Sent from my GT-S5830i using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
andy.acei said:
And on paper our Gpu is powerful..If it works well then cm7 should be the first step.
Sent from my GALAXY ACE on Ace cream v1.2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM9 & CM10 Work Perfectly on galaxy GIO too. And apart from a greater PPI value, galaxy gio is lesser in sepcs as compared to Ace-i. I also think (And Hope) CM9 & 10 should work like a charm on 5830i as well in the near future. :good:
saeed14i said:
CM9 & CM10 Work Perfectly on galaxy GIO too. And apart from a greater PPI value, galaxy gio is lesser in sepcs as compared to Ace-i. I also think (And Hope) CM9 & 10 should work like a charm on 5830i as well in the near future. :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Specs do not matter much to run CM9/10. But you need good specs to run it smoothly. Even HTC G1, the first android phone, has Jelly bean but it lags.
Availability of drivers for chipset matters the most.
system.img said:
Specs do not matter much to run CM9/10. But you need good specs to run it smoothly. Even HTC G1, the first android phone, has Jelly bean but it lags.
Availability of drivers for chipset matters the most.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You right mate, we should move like Galaxy Y users, but here is everybody ""waiting"" for a miracle, but if all of we don't do nothing the miracle will not happens...
For people thinking we are going to be running CM9/10 smoothly on our Ace, read this: https://plus.google.com/+CyanogenMod/posts/MRnnvs3oFUF
paradoxiumwind said:
For people thinking we are going to be running CM9/10 smoothly on our Ace, read this: https://plus.google.com/+CyanogenMod/posts/MRnnvs3oFUF
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This is old news.
It just means that they wont officially support snapdragon s1.
paradoxiumwind said:
For people thinking we are going to be running CM9/10 smoothly on our Ace, read this: https://plus.google.com/+CyanogenMod/posts/MRnnvs3oFUF
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It means cyanogen wont provide a official CM9 for our device. But developers here can make a port or tweak it to run in our device once all sources regarding the CPU/GPU/kernel are available. :beer:
Sent from my GT-S5830i using Tapatalk 2
schakusa said:
You right mate, we should move like Galaxy Y users, but here is everybody ""waiting"" for a miracle, but if all of we don't do nothing the miracle will not happens...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But i think if Galaxy Y can have the sources, we can get too, because we have the same hardware and bla bla bla.
InnerSanctum said:
But i think if Galaxy Y can have the sources, we can get too, because we have the same hardware and bla bla bla.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He think he meant that we should also support them as much as we can....so that broadcom really feels that there is an urgent need for the sources.
Sent from my GT-S5830i using Tapatalk 2
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1330150
Here, I found an amazing app which copy the PIE control.
Here is a video about this: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xvGiOQAMI3o
So, is there any developer here, who could port it for our little Mini? :fingers-crossed:
Instead of starting new thread you should've look around first, as it's already proved to be working... I'm using it right now...
Right. I wanted it faster than google could find for me. sorry.
Where the link for SGM?
abieofficial said:
Where the link for SGM?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here you go:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2131339
Enjoy
Press thanks if i helped you.
DeathMetal King said:
Here you go:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2131339
Enjoy
Press thanks if i helped you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you sir
I'll try to flash to Chocobread. Are is will work?
Sorry my bad english
abieofficial said:
Thank you sir
I'll try to flash to Chocobread. Are is will work?
Sorry my bad english
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Choco bread is an old ROM, im not sure it will work on that, but it will definitely work on newer ROMS , even CM10 and 10.1
BTW why chocobread? There are so many other better ROMS. If you go to android development section you will find many better ROMs than chocobread. Hell, even cm10.1 works properly now (android development>>Bazinga ROM by The Alchemist)
DeathMetal King said:
Choco bread is an old ROM, im not sure it will work on that, but it will definitely work on newer ROMS , even CM10 and 10.1
BTW why chocobread? There are so many other better ROMS. If you go to android development section you will find many better ROMs than chocobread. Hell, even cm10.1 works properly now (android development>>Bazinga ROM by The Alchemist)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But, I don't know why I more like use gingerbread based rom. Because I'm afraid my mini get wrong when I not use gingerbread based rom. My mini vibrator and jack headset phone going wrong
I had use CM10.1 By Rohan in the past. My phone get wrong. I dunno what wrong with my flashing, but I believe I flashing the rom correctly...
abieofficial said:
But, I don't know why I more like use gingerbread based rom. Because I'm afraid my mini get wrong when I not use gingerbread based rom. My mini vibrator and jack headset phone going wrong
I had use CM10.1 By Rohan in the past. My phone get wrong. I dunno what wrong with my flashing, but I believe I flashing the rom correctly...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm sorry to hear that. If your phone is still under warranty, flash stock ROM and take it to SSC. (Actually even if it not under warranty, take it to SSC to determine the cause of your problems- it could be hardware related...for all you know, you could have purchased a defective model)
As for the correct method to flash a ROM-
1) Boot into Recovery.
2) Wipe data, Cache partiton.
3) Go to advanced>>wipe Dalvik cache
4) Install update from sd card>>choose update>>ROM.zip
5) After flash wipe data and cache partition.
6) Reboot.
That's all.
Hope this helped. Best of luck in fixing your phone:fingers-crossed::fingers-crossed:
CyAnO Plus Project
---Only on XDA---
Read before drawing conclusions!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, you read that right! With the project cyano plus we will try to port the cyanogen mod 10 on our device (GT-S5570I).
As you may know many devices have hardware libraries updated to support the cyanogen mod, many, but our...... we have always said: Why the Galaxy Mini because galaxy mini has the cyanogen mod and we don't? Why the galaxy mini has a different chipset from our although the indirect predecessor of our device?
So, why port bring a cyanogen mod on our device? Impossible?? So why not create a rom that has the same motto of cyanogen mod: to be an alternative to the stock rom! For now, the project is limited to a stock-based rom: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2171934
but with your help we can go a long way....
So..
If you want to collaborate to make yourself available answer to the post
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GOODLUCK!
I don't want hurt your heart & fingers.
But...
Wrong thread. Read XDA Rules, development thread is for RELEASED works, not discussion and any other type of that.
really looking forward to it! wish you luck in this project!
In fact need not porting. In fact need to build CM-10* for you device from source.
I build 4.2.2 for galaxy mini but this device have different board.
lol we even not hv a complete CM7
kissingmylove said:
lol we even not hv a complete CM7
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In fact, the project is to run the various CM
Jeeko said:
In fact, the project is to run the various CM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If u use stock,it just look like theming
The only way to get aosp is build fr source
I was using madteam CM7 but it has to much bugs. I hope that this project will be a success.
bogdan99999 said:
I was using madteam CM7 but it has to much bugs. I hope that this project will be a success.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i hope it too but without official driver from broadcom, it wont success
Galaxy Pop Plus'ımdan Tapatalk 2 ile gönderildi.
I would like to send them a mail to, but I don't exactly know how to formulate it. I mean, I can't send them e email like this " RELEASE THE DRIVER OR I WILL KILL YOU", I need to think to a "template".
bogdan99999 said:
I would like to send them a mail to, but I don't exactly know how to formulate it. I mean, I can't send them e email like this " RELEASE THE DRIVER OR I WILL KILL YOU", I need to think to a "template".
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Given the situation would be right.But unfortunately you have to try to be as friendly as possible! :silly:
Jeeko said:
Given the situation would be right.But unfortunately you have to try to be as friendly as possible! :silly:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And the email adress is ... .?
bogdan99999 said:
And the email adress is ... .?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Read this: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2210580
Q:
If you use the driver from galaxy Y and a rom that has almost no bugs will work ?
Till now no stable cm7
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda app-developers app