As said in the title, this for everyone who have troubles looking for a ROM of you choice.
First things first, the first post shall be putting ROMs under its base. (Eg. CM. Etc)
At the bottom of this post shall be ROMs grouped under speed
Second post shall group ROMs under stability
Third category (In 2nd post after Stability) shall group ROMs under popularity
-ALL GROUPINGS ARE MADE THROUGH COMMENTS OF EACH OT
START
Grouped By Base
CyanogenMod7 (CM7)
Spoiler
Official CM7
Boype's Modded CM7
Temasek's KANG
SEMC Debrand Engine
MIUI
Spoiler
MIUI v2.4.1 | v2.3.7 By Tantrums
MIUI v2.1a | Aroma
ShenduOS
Spoiler
Official ShenduOS
Mercurified
MokeeOS
Spoiler
CICI ROM
Stock Froyo
Spoiler
NOVA
Pays-ROM
Stock Gingerbread
Spoiler
Zues
Noa V5 Sense + SE
SUPRESSED ROM
Many more... adding time by time
Stock ICS
Spoiler
Nope. Not yet
CM9
Spoiler
Free Optimus Project | FOP CM9
PARANOIDANDROID | CM9HYBRID
AOKP
Spoiler
Unofficial AOKP
CM10
Spoiler
Not yet
[/QUOTE]
Grouped according to speed
Spoiler
EXTREMELY FAST
Zues v6.39
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fast
Above-Average
Normal
Below Average
Unacceptable
Grouped By Stability
Grouped by Popularity
TOP is most popular
Spoiler
Zues v6.39
Sent from my LG-P970 using xda premium
RESERVED
Sent from my LG-P970 using Tapatalk 2
No links? Btw, look into my noob how to... I already made a list of availible ROMs Stability is relativ, so ranking ROMs according to it, doesnt make sence, since it is different for almost every user, as you can see in all of the ROM threads. And why would you wanna rank them according to popularity? Everyone has to choose on his own, if he likes a ROM or not. So I think, this is just another obsolete post of you...
N00BY0815 said:
No links? Btw, look into my noob how to... I already made a list of availible ROMs Stability is relativ, so ranking ROMs according to it, doesnt make sence, since it is different for almost every user, as you can see in all of the ROM threads. And why would you wanna rank them according to popularity? Everyone has to choose on his own, if he likes a ROM or not. So I think, this is just another obsolete post of you...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nooby, By popularity
I mean by downloads
By stability, i see the consumer satisfaction (Number of reported problems)
Please get your thinking right. Always think positive.
Peace
Sent from my LG-P970 using Tapatalk 2
I also agree with nooby. This is ..... well just doesn't make any sense ! Users experience is different with almost everyone. What's stable for you could not be for me regardless of reported problems or whatever. And I think the best way to find popularity is simple...start a poll with a list of the roms and ask what rom everyone uses as a daily driver can't go buy downloads or post count or however you plan to figure that out.
There were already lists of ROMs and polls with ROMs.
Most of the ROMs get abandoned soon after release, so there's no point to install such ROM - no bugs will be corrected, no future improvements will be introduced.
I doubt you will be able to maintain this list...
Which is the Zues ROM? I don't know that one, but I know the Zeus ROM though
Enviado desde mi LG-P970 usando Tapatalk 2
Could you regularly upload roms which are not contained on xda? For example official Mokee OS, ShenduOS and other Asian roms and those which are contained on other forums.
That would give this thread some much needed depth, but in saying that it is also missing something. This thread has already been done by N00BY and needs something extra so ppl won't ask for it to be closed.
Maybe do some research into each rom and note changes or benefit/problems with each from in comparison to its base.
Sent from my LG-P970 using Tapatalk 2
I don't think there's any harm in having this thread. If he has the time, it's admirable that he wants to contribute to the community.
P.S Not taking sides or anything, but some people do go by popularity in choosing ROMs/customization (eg. no. of downloads of an app).
2c
Again, just looking for some THANKS, why don't stop being an Attention Hoe, this is again an useless topic. There is a Search bar and Developer Sub Forum, thats the reason for everything.
Mexickano said:
Again, just looking for some THANKS, why don't stop being an Attention Hoe, this is again an useless topic. There is a Search bar and Developer Sub Forum, thats the reason for everything.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You too are looking for attention. Many people thanks when they think its right. So you are also. Face the mirror and reflect on yourself before mentoring others. I want to help the community, not like you, flaming. If you notice. I have never flamed.
Sent from my LG-P970 using Tapatalk 2
Thread closed
XDA isn't a popularity contest site, it's a development site. What appeals to one may not appeal to the other, comparisons do nothing but cause problems. We have ROM listings, that's all we need.
Related
Closing thread down done with aokp.
Close thread please.
No fix's close thread.
Great!!!!! Downloading..
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA
You sure are on top of your game mate!
Thanks alot for your contribution to this community
YAYYY!! Jamie brings the awesome AOKP to note. with the latest builds, brilliant bro! thank you soo much!
I just wanted to flash your "CodenameAndroid"-ROM but now I'm seeing this ROM. So what's the difference between these two?
Igor02 said:
I just wanted to flash your "CodenameAndroid"-ROM but now I'm seeing this ROM. So what's the difference between these two?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
pretty much settings/user preferences/other things.
CNA has some things, AOKP has some things, they both have some things
and im trying to make CNA more tablet mode orientated since AOKP has more ability to switch between phone/tablet modes easier
Does this have all the bugs which the AOSP ROM has?
Sent from my Galaxy S!
download is VERY slow!!!!!!!!
aakaashjois said:
Does this have all the bugs which the AOSP ROM has?
Sent from my Galaxy S!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
*facepalm* way to make yourself look stupid on page 1 of the thread
please go back to the top of the OP and read the big read writing.
then read down a bit to where it says BUGS.
goofy584 said:
download is VERY slow!!!!!!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
its a godaddy server, its been good to me sofar
just clicked download, its fairly slow :\
im waiting on someone for a second host so i can have 2 different links for the roms.
Yeah Im downloading right. I just downloaded your CNA but this had to come out. Guess i might as well test both of them.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
what's the different with ics stunner B3
ericlovesure said:
what's the different with ics stunner B3
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ICS stunner is based on ICS Euphoria which is based on features from AOKP and CM9. You will have euphoria controls which are a mix of controls from Both
AOKP is the open kang project which is separate from cm9, with its own set of controls and features
Highly recommend you to check both roms out! Fabulous roms!
Super slow download :-(
sent from my gnote full of awesomeness
Can this be used in phone mode 320 DPI without soft keys?
aakaashjois said:
I have a Note too. I am just using my Galaxy S now. There are quite a few AOSP Roms for N7000. I didnt know which rom's bugs he meant when he said "Anything from AOSP"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bugs on x AOSP will be on y AOSP xD This is same base...
But there are a lot of 4.0 roms: AOSP, AOKP or other, and i think many users are lost, because more explications and differencies must be listing between these roms...
God damn pls stops these noob bashing.
It is incredibly. Many of you may not remember that they were sometimes noobs.
Congrats @ Jamie
aakaashjois said:
I have a Note too. I am just using my Galaxy S now. There are quite a few AOSP Roms for N7000. I didnt know which rom's bugs he meant when he said "Anything from AOSP"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No worries mate. Its all good, you are always good to ask questions if they confuse you The common bugs which all aosp and aokp roms share are the same because they are all based on Imilkas aosp v6 rom.
But I would recommend you to see the OP with the list of bugs mentioned there too and the aosp bug list as well.
And I recommend you trying the few roms for note, to see which one suits you according to your preference. cheers!
So, what are the differences between these ROM types? Any particular advantages to either of them?
Sent from my superior GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
Zamboney said:
So, what are the differences between these ROM types? Any particular advantages to either of them?
Sent from my superior GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nice article by a friend-
http://knowmydroid.com/blog/what-is-aokp-rom-how-is-it-different-from-cm9
Sounds like they are mostly cosmetical, although choice is good of course. Hopefully we'll have both!
Sent from my superior GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
May the KANG be with you guys!
^_^
AOSP means android open source project.. Any rom that derivates from that it's an AOSP rom...
AOKP team named their rom that way implying that they are "kanging" AOSP like many people kangs cm7/9/10
Kang means cook a rom based on other people's work so in a way every rom its a "kang" from AOSP, even TW roms as TW its just a "skin" but under the hood its just plain and simple Android.
If a developer doesn't modify the AOSP code they would be releasing Google's roms Wich its stock Android.
But there's differences between cooking and developing and that's why you see 2 sections in development the original Wich should be developers whom modify and support roms straight from AOSP being able of actually fix bugs and issues and the regular development Wich its people that uses kitchens and scrips to create roms.. No actually developing code..
So at the end AOKP its a rom based on AOSP, as cm10 and every single rom that derivates from AOSP, go and check development section in galaxy nexus forum and you will see what's development.. There's no less than 100 different rom's all coded from AOSP.. AOSP is the mother of every rom that exist
Tapatalking on my n7000
msedek said:
AOSP means android open source project.. Any rom that derivates from that it's an AOSP rom...
AOKP team named their rom that way implying that they are "kanging" AOSP like many people kangs cm7/9/10
Kang means cook a rom based on other people's work so in a way every rom its a "kang" from AOSP, even TW roms as TW its just a "skin" but under the hood its just plain and simple Android.
If a developer doesn't modify the AOSP code they would be releasing Google's roms Wich its stock Android.
But there's differences between cooking and developing and that's why you see 2 sections in development the original Wich should be developers whom modify and support roms straight from AOSP being able of actually fix bugs and issues and the regular development Wich its people that uses kitchens and scrips to create roms.. No actually developing code..
So at the end AOKP its a rom based on AOSP, as cm10 and every single rom that derivates from AOSP, go and check development section in galaxy nexus forum and you will see what's development.. There's no less than 100 different rom's all coded from AOSP.. AOSP is the mother of every rom that exist
Tapatalking on my n7000
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks a lot, that was really helpful!
doctorgallo said:
Thanks a lot, that was really helpful!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was reading different threads and found this one. Great explanation! Why is it that some features like wi-fi calling dont work on aosp?
Wipef
tytngasman said:
I was reading different threads and found this one. Great explanation! Why is it that some features like wi-fi calling dont work on aosp?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The AOSP roms are often unofficial and are made by our cool developers, so there are some features that don't work. But those are usually fixed sooner or later
Skickat från min HTC One via Tapatalk 2
Read this thread too, Will help
http://androidforums.com/triumph-all-things-root/541600-aokp-vs-aosp.html
dasunh said:
Read this thread too, Will help
http://androidforums.com/triumph-all-things-root/541600-aokp-vs-aosp.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanx
Skickat från min HTC One via Tapatalk 2
Hi guys, I just saw this video on youtube. What can you tell me more about this ROM? I think it is very good in the 1st views....could you know more details about this one?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9OpodlihxVw There is a link to the website but it is in a language that I don´t know....
Waiting for your feedback
it's the ravenous series (v5)....a great non-xda series. i had the verison 4.0 and they had emulated the Xperia theme extremely deep. gotta see to if any1 can give a full insight of the ROM.
Can this ROM could be put here in XDA so any XDA member could know that this ROM exists? And also...He say that has got OC 800-1300Htz..... How is this Rom performance....battery life, etc....All the things that all people like to know about a ROM
I'm working on bringing HTC sense look in my Rom So, this rom is a good start
The rom got OC because that rom it´s based on Zeus by huexxx....
ohhhh....I see.....I´ll wait for your HTC Sense look in your Rom
Using Ravenous for months now here, superb ROM.
Sent from my LG-P970 using xda premium
someone can create a MediaFire mirror for this rom?? the download speed is too low!!
it is a RIP
ok...i downloaded the ROM & flashed it.
basically it is just a themed rip of ZEUS (v6.1) and SUPRESSED (v2).
for Zeus, u can find it directly, for supressed stamps, a bit of using is needed.
it is unfortunate to see people using parts from xda ROMs and not even bother mentioning the names of people from whom he ripped it.
it is just excess baggage and burdened ROM with LP widgetlocker and the likes.
i don't mind people using our ROM rips as base, but not mentioning the credits is plain bad.
i have a plethora of credits in supressed ROM series, each mentioned properly for what they are thanked for.
giving credit doesn't categorize the work that u did as paltry. it merely means u are responsible.
achyut said:
ok...i downloaded the ROM & flashed it.
basically it is just a themed rip of ZEUS (v6.1) and SUPRESSED (v2).
for Zeus, u can find it directly, for supressed stamps, a bit of using is needed.
it is unfortunate to see people using parts from xda ROMs and not even bother mentioning the names of people from whom he ripped it.
it is just excess baggage and burdened ROM with LP widgetlocker and the likes.
i don't mind people using our ROM rips as base, but not mentioning the credits is plain bad.
i have a plethora of credits in supressed ROM series, each mentioned properly for what they are thanked for.
giving credit doesn't categorize the work that u did as paltry. it merely means u are responsible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i'm sorry to say but credits are given.... i see diffrent times he's pointing at xda and huexx.....
Any way i'll check the rom out
DiederikC said:
i'm sorry to say but credits are given.... i see diffrent times he's pointing at xda and huexx.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1st post??..the credits are ought to be in a legible and differentiated tab, which we don't have to search for.
achyut said:
1st post??..the credits are ought to be in a legible and differentiated tab, which we don't have to search for.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well it's mentioned next to what he uses
Hi
I must say I am a bit disconnected from the Android world since I get to university and I must ask how all have evolved. I'm looking for the newest most stable custom roms at the moment of this post. I think it would be a good idea to maintain a post like this to keep track of what roms have reached a stable, proven state without having to dig too much.
Cheers!
16bitboy said:
Hi
I must say I am a bit disconnected from the Android world since I get to university and I must ask how all have evolved. I'm looking for the newest most stable custom roms at the moment of this post. I think it would be a good idea to maintain a post like this to keep track of what roms have reached a stable, proven state without having to dig too much.
Cheers!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well there's the RC4 build (release candidate 4) of cyanogen mod 10.1 that's quite good. Its based on android 4.2.2.
Take note that you should ask questions in the questions section and ROM discussions are generally frowned upon so do venture into the development section to learn more about them.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk 2
ballsofsteel said:
Take note that you should ask questions in the questions section and ROM discussions are generally frowned upon so do venture into the development section to learn more about them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OOPS!! I forgot the Q&A section totally. I would like to move this post or delete it but I don't see how I should do it. The Edit/delete button just drives me to the edit section and I don't see any way of deleting the post.
No worries, a mod will lock or move this thread eventually
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk 2
I recommend roms with Mackay kernel, they are often stable and durable in battery but less powerful than Devil kernel. By the way, no one has moved or deleted this post yet =))
latest official samsung firmware tend to be the fastest most secure and stable ... try it maybe [ROOTED / 3FILE] XWJWB#_XEEJW2_XWJW1 by stock+
somator said:
latest official samsung firmware tend to be the fastest most secure and stable ... try it maybe [ROOTED / 3FILE] XWJWB#_XEEJW2_XWJW1 by stock+
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Latest official firmware for this phone is it 4.1 or 4.2?
Sent from my X10 using xda app-developers app
epulrevo said:
Latest official firmware for this phone is it 4.1 or 4.2?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that particular 2.3.6 (XWJWB_XEEJW2_XWJW1)
Hi Friends ,
I have galaxy s advanced from last six months and during that time i have installed different custom roms on my mobile , Many roms are ported and originally not made for S-Advanced and causes lots of problem. I tried nearly every available custom rom and finally i settled on one rom but i will not mention name of that rom now. I just want to know your experience about this roms and please suggest best rom for our most loved Galaxy S -advance. Please don't give your suggestion by just reading others post, give your suggestion only if you have tried it.
This Are links for different ROMS for our S-Advance
1. Unofficial CyanogenMod 10.1 : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2108362
2. Unofficial CyanogenMod 10 : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2248822
3. Unofficial AOKP 4.2.2 | Sources Built : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2369931
4. Paranoid Android 3.60 : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2246822
5. PAC 23.0.X | ParanoidAndroid + AOKP + CM10.1 | Source built : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2324100
6. HarshJelly ROM v2.0 - A pure touchwiz experience : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2342314
7. UNOFFICIAL CARBON ROM based on PAC 23.0 [BETA v2] | Ported : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2348906
8. MIUI v4 [BETA 5/5B - 19.08.2013] : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2197333
9. Pure Vanilla ★ Smoothness Refined ★ Solid Stable (25/6/13) : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2182697
10. AOKP 4.1.2 [Build 1] : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2363061
11. LightJB v1.2 - with a touch of S4 : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2244441
12. [ROM] [GALAXPERIA]_v2.0 : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2206406
13. Optimus Droid : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2201240
14. Windows Phone Project : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2210864
15. [CM10] SamNex : http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2362273
This is not a constructive post. Comparing ROM's and the dev's is not a good thing.
Not only is it not a good thing but it is prohibited here in XDA to compare roms. The mods will definitely close this thread soon.
To the OP, you should read the thread of the rom and search in general section there are already lots of threads like this. And all was shut down by forum mods but you can still read the reviews/comments.
My advice: Read, read and read. Even if you think you have read enough, just keep reading.
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda app-developers app
I think this thread can help s advance users in a way..
Everybody has there views. People use what works best, if this thread gives a little knowledge in that means. Then that's good.
Comparing ROMS n DEV's is totally diff thing. Few devs of not so popular ROM n modify to request immediately, n devs of best ROM r hidden God. So I feel it's not the point here. It can b a little helpful thread n that's what this forum is bout, increasing knowledge, atleast I feel so.
Rest moderators knows the best..
:thumbup:
Sent from my GT-I9070 using Tapatalk 2
You can start giving your review first then. Share to us what you find out after trying them all out.
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda app-developers app
Sorry if anybody hurt,
Sorry if anybody hurt because of this post. I have tested all this 15 roms. I am not hardcore android develper, i am basically wed deveopler but i wanted to try every available rom for my device and wanted to stay in touch with this new development. I am tracking nearly all in I9070 section for long time and keep testing everything. I bricked my phone more than 10 times but i learned a lot. But i know many testers visit this site , try 1 or 2 popular roms and when this roms not works upto there expectation or keep crashing they stop testing and return to stock . I just wanted to give those many persons like me this available options and want there reviews on this different roms. I have given links to all roms so they can download them. Many ROMs are very good but not popular or neglected. So please post your reviews only after testing them.
There is no point of comparing devs or ROMs. People use what is best. Xperia z ultra is far superior dan GS4. But that doesn't mean that GS4 is bad. This is just a kind of review. I am very satisfied with Light JB 1.2 except few minor bugs.
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda app-developers app
Please REMOVE my poll from this post.
I request administrator to remove poll from this post. I put it in the post but as per XDA rule i cant remove it so please remove the poll from this post . Thank you.
androiddoctor said:
I request administrator to remove poll from this post. I put it in the post but as per XDA rule i cant remove it so please remove the poll from this post . Thank you.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just to know that mods do not like comparing threads. Do not think so that those users that commended here atacking you. Look all over xda, those kind of threads are being locked.
It would be World war 3 if someone posted Android vs iOS.
P.S. To argument my words: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1965037
Послато са GT-I9070 користећи Тапаталк 4
shut_down said:
Just to know that mods do not like comparing threads. Do not think so that those users that commended here atacking you. Look all over xda, those kind of threads are being locked.
It would be World war 3 if someone posted Android vs iOS.
P.S. To argument my words: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1965037
Послато са GT-I9070 користећи Тапаталк 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dear Sir,
I never wanted to criticize any rom , i just wanted to help other visitors and testers to find available roms and i want them to test this roms . All roms listed above are very nice but some of them are vastly neglected , i thought this post might help those roms to become popular and which might lead us to perfect rom for our beloved galaxy S-advanced. Many developers stopped there development and or concentrating other project just because there rom is not popular. I never thought this will hurt others . Putting that poll along with this post is my biggest mistake
androiddoctor said:
Dear Sir,
I never wanted to criticize any rom , i just wanted to help other visitors and testers to find available roms and i want them to test this roms . All roms listed above are very nice but some of them are vastly neglected , i thought this post might help those roms to become popular and which might lead us to perfect rom for our beloved galaxy S-advanced. Many developers stopped there development and or concentrating other project just because there rom is not popular. I never thought this will hurt others . Putting that poll along with this post is my biggest mistake
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Calm down. I just told you what mods are up to. :angel:
Hey...is the stable build of the cyanogenmod available yet? Cant wait to flash it.iv used jellymod before and it was nice except the performance was a little less compared to stock.can anyone tell when the cyanogenmod will be done?
Sent from my GT-I9070 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
bloodalvin784 said:
Hey...is the stable build of the cyanogenmod available yet? Cant wait to flash it.iv used jellymod before and it was nice except the performance was a little less compared to stock.can anyone tell when the cyanogenmod will be done?
Sent from my GT-I9070 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM rule: No ETA's. With that being said, current nightly of cm10.1 is good and can be used as daily driver if you don't mind:
1. Wifi tether and wifi direct not working.
2. Blurry image and video hangs on latest youtube (the app fault not the rom, you have to use older version of youtube and it works fine).
3. Camera bug in instagram (but just take the pic first and later edit in instagram and post. I always do that anyway so it doesn't matter at all).
4. Battery issue (can't charge offline).
5. GPS (you hve to calibrate it first then it works just fine).
Choice is yours. :good:
I tried it once...was too laggy and the antutu score came down to 4500 from 7000.I'm now using stock with cocore 7.6 antutu score has gone upto 9200.which one do u suggest? Custom rom or keep using stock?
Sent from my GT-I9070 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Hey Friend If You Are Looking For Stable ROM you should Stick To Custom ROM,
For Our Galaxy S Advanced There Is No Official Custom ROM, All ROMS come with Some Bugs.
If You Want New Feature In Your Device You Have To Compromise With Stability.
Some Stock Firmware Based ROM are More Stable Like Galexperia But Don't Come With Much Extra Feature.
CM10.0 Is Now Very Much Developed and stable.
Diegio working hard on CM10.1 and I M Sure He Will Release Final Version Very Soon. Untill now 21/06 is more stable than others according to me.
Thanks bro
Sent from my GT-I9070 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
androiddoctor said:
....He Will Release Final Version Very Soon. ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you wanna say STABLE not FINAL.
R_a_z_v_a_n said:
I think you wanna say STABLE not FINAL.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Right.
androiddoctor said:
Hey Friend If You Are Looking For Stable ROM you should Stick To Custom ROM,
For Our Galaxy S Advanced There Is No Official Custom ROM, All ROMS come with Some Bugs.
If You Want New Feature In Your Device You Have To Compromise With Stability.
Some Stock Firmware Based ROM are More Stable Like Galexperia But Don't Come With Much Extra Feature.
CM10.0 Is Now Very Much Developed and stable.
Diegio working hard on CM10.1 and I M Sure He Will Release Final Version Very Soon. Untill now 21/06 is more stable than others according to me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you tried 27/08 build onwards? So much better than 21/06.
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda app-developers app
My personal opinion is harsh jelly v2.1
Sent from my GT-I9070 using xda app-developers app