Related
Reading around, I have found that the Galaxy Tab has the same amount of ram as the Galaxy S, however, when you read the available ram it says it has 444 mb (somewhere around there) compared to the 304 mb of the galaxy S (343 mb of you use the speedmod)
So my first question is if we can look at the Galaxy Tab, and just port over the code to allow more available ram to the Galaxy S?
My second question is that the Galaxy Tab supports Full 1080p HD playback. Since both the S and the Tab have the same GPU chip, I was wondering if we can also port that to the Galaxy S.
Now i know i know, 1080p playback on a phone is useless, but its not useless for ppl who have DLNA-capable TV's and for who-knows-when Samsung will get that microUSB to HDMI cable working.
UPDATE (11/7/10): Another thought came to mind last night. Reading through the Speedmod thread, there were certain amounts of ram before 720p recording and playback stopped working. Well, can we create some kind of script where we only had the allocated the ram of one of them? IDK how to really put this into words, but I don't think anyone will ever record 720p and watch a 720p video at the same time, so can we have it so that the ram is only open for one or the other, and it switches depending on whether you are recording 720p or watching it? Instead of having both of them take up ram, like have only one of them, at a time, taking up ram. Not sure of that really made sense :/
And port the large screen too.
Ya I agree I'd love a bigger screen.
10 billion dollars to have someone who can turn my screen into 5 inches.
Another 5 billion if they can do it without taking up extra space.
I'm sorry about that I just couldn't help myself
opcow said:
And port the large screen too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
michael.seltzer said:
Ya I agree I'd love a bigger screen.
10 billion dollars to have someone who can turn my screen into 5 inches.
Another 5 billion if they can do it without taking up extra space.
I'm sorry about that I just couldn't help myself
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whats even funnier is how your sarcasm doesn't even make sense because what I am suggesting is actually possible because the hardware is identical in both aspects, and since both devices run android, it should not be a hard port. Thats why I'm asking if an experienced developer or anyone with skill in programming to take a look in it.
If you aren't going to contribute an educated answer or a helpful one, please don't comment. I'm just someone asking a question, and sarcastic answers like this aren't necessary.
Ya sorry abou thatt. I see you question vut this has all already been discussed that the rest of the ram is used for system apps and stuff so you probably wouldnt want to change that.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
michael.seltzer said:
Ya sorry abou thatt. I see you question vut this has all already been discussed that the rest of the ram is used for system apps and stuff so you probably wouldnt want to change that.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah... but you're saying the Galaxy Tab doesn't have system apps....I'm pretty sure it does...
I'm pretty sure even the firmware are very similar because of the identical hardware, other than the screen and camera.
crazililazn said:
Yeah... but you're saying the Galaxy Tab doesn't have system apps....I'm pretty sure it does...
I'm pretty sure even the firmware are very similar because of the identical hardware, other than the screen and camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He says system apps because of the video playback. If you go to the i9000 developtment section youll see a kernel thread called speed mod. (This is what setirons kernel is based off of) in there youll see the that certain amount of memory is needed to playback videos in 720p.
Thats what i think hes talking about system apps.
Now if you want 1080p playback AND more ram youll see why its not currently possible
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
tytdfn said:
He says system apps because of the video playback. If you go to the i9000 developtment section youll see a kernel thread called speed mod. (This is what setirons kernel is based off of) in there youll see the that certain amount of memory is needed to playback videos in 720p.
Thats what i think hes talking about system apps.
Now if you want 1080p playback AND more ram youll see why its not currently possible
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah but you aren't getting my point. The Galaxy Tab has the same amount of ram as the Galaxy S.... So how can the Galaxy S use less ram for playing 1080p...
That is what I want ported.
crazililazn said:
Yeah but you aren't getting my point. The Galaxy Tab has the same amount of ram as the Galaxy S.... So how can the Galaxy S use less ram for playing 1080p...
That is what I want ported.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did someone took apart Galaxy S to confirm that it does indeed have everything identical ?
If not , for all we know it might have way more ram and or updated media hardware guts.
crazililazn said:
Yeah but you aren't getting my point. The Galaxy Tab has the same amount of ram as the Galaxy S.... So how can the Galaxy S use less ram for playing 1080p...
That is what I want ported.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm pretty sure somebody discovered the Galaxy Tab actually has 768 MB of RAM. It's just that Samsung didn't disclose that.
Disgustipated said:
I'm pretty sure somebody discovered the Galaxy Tab actually has 768 MB of RAM. It's just that Samsung didn't disclose that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, just searched through google and xda galaxy tab section and I can't find anything stating that.
crazililazn said:
Nope, just searched through google and xda galaxy tab section and I can't find anything stating that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not to mention from what I understand the hardware might br similar but is not close to identical. If the galaxy s phones were identical then roms would be interchangeable etc. But it isn't. I think ports of features would be nice, but I wouldn't get my hopes up if I were you. The ram issue has been worked on and from what I understand 340 I'd all they have been able to unlock.
I think the most important thing captivate devs could do right now is aosp because that will open a whole world of possibilities bit even that is amazingly difficult because of the way samsung built their system and all of the wonderful hooks and links.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
provoked said:
Not to mention from what I understand the hardware might br similar but is not close to identical. If the galaxy s phones were identical then roms would be interchangeable etc. But it isn't. I think ports of features would be nice, but I wouldn't get my hopes up if I were you.
I think the most important thing captivate devs could do right now is aosp because that will open a whole world of possibilities bit even that is amazingly difficult because of the way samsung built their system and all of the wonderful hooks and links.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The hardware is the same, other than the screen and camera. They both have a Hummingbird 1 ghz CPU and a SGX540 GPU chip, same amount of ram.
Btw, has anyone tried flashing a Galaxy tab rom on a Galaxy S? Since most of the hardware is the same, i would predict that the camera wouldnt work, and the screen MIGHT work, but the icons would be way larger than normal, but for everything else, it should work cuz the hardware is identical.
crazililazn said:
The hardware is the same, other than the screen and camera. They both have a Hummingbird 1 ghz CPU and a SGX540 GPU chip, same amount of ram.
Btw, has anyone tried flashing a Galaxy tab rom on a Galaxy S? Since most of the hardware is the same, i would predict that the camera wouldnt work, and the screen MIGHT work, but the icons would be way larger than normal, but for everything else, it should work cuz the hardware is identical.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Run a diff on the roms. I'm guessing there are a lot more differences than screen and camera.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
provoked said:
Run a diff on the roms. I'm guessing there are a lot more differences than screen and camera.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wait, can you type this again? I didn't get what you meant.
crazililazn said:
Wait, can you type this again? I didn't get what you meant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm no developer but I know you can take 2 sets of rom files and run scripts that compare differences. I don't how to do it. But I know the devs were using this to try to get diffs between aosp and the leaked froyo to try to fill in gaps.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
provoked said:
I'm no developer but I know you can take 2 sets of rom files and run scripts that compare differences. I don't how to do it. But I know the devs were using this to try to get diffs between aosp and the leaked froyo to try to fill in gaps.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is there a dev thread on this? I would like to read through it. Might be a good read :]
Don't know if there is a direct thread. I wish there was. I would like to get more in-depth with the captivate.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
provoked said:
Don't know if there is a direct thread. I wish there was. I would like to get more in-depth with the captivate.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmm, interesting. where did you read about this? in the galaxy tab section?
crazililazn said:
Hmm, interesting. where did you read about this? in the galaxy tab section?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Look for gdankos post "any brave volunteers" about aosp. Its definitely in there.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I897 using XDA App
Here's the catch: Vibrant ROMs are so large. With that thought in mind, I was thinking about how small we could get a ROM. How about everybody gives it a shot?
ROM TO USE: Deodexed KB1 (EDT)
My take at it: KB1 (113,126 KB)
I think thats the main point of the Loki rom by Brick... I think its around 110MB... Don't remember if its based off of KB1 tho
EDIT: Just checked and its 111MB, themed, and KB1 based
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Why does size matter anyway?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
what are the limits ?
smackdown85146 said:
Here's the catch: Vibrant ROMs are so large. With that thought in mind, I was thinking about how small we could get a ROM. How about everybody gives it a shot?
ROM TO USE: Deodexed KB1 (EDT)
My take at it: KB1 (113,126 KB)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i can go as small as 60mb
maybe smaller. this isnt a game u guys will want to play
jumaaneface said:
i can go as small as 60mb
maybe smaller. this isnt a game u guys will want to play
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can go to 4mb...
But it wont boot xD
Really, what is this thread doing here? LOL.
Does it really matter how small someone can make it?
jumaaneface said:
i can go as small as 60mb
maybe smaller. this isnt a game u guys will want to play
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd love to see a Vibrant ROM at around 60mb. What are you stripping out to get it that small?
MorphiusFaydal said:
I'd love to see a Vibrant ROM at around 60mb. What are you stripping out to get it that small?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I also would liketo know that. What's the lowest android can go while still maintaing functionality, like pure barebones
Sent from my side of town using a series of tubes
I just saved a bunch of money on my auto insurance!
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
shovelhead83 said:
I just saved a bunch of money on my auto insurance!
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Master™ said:
I can go to 4mb...
But it wont boot xD
Really, what is this thread doing here? LOL.
Does it really matter how small someone can make it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In a way, it does. I just want to see how small somebody can make it. Downloads can be a real hassle if the ROM is gigantic. I personally think this is fun and interesting
smackdown85146 said:
In a way, it does. I just want to see how small somebody can make it. Downloads can be a real hassle if the ROM is gigantic. I personally think this is fun and interesting
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? This is 2011 who is having bandwidth problems that even a 50% reduction in ROM size would affect?
pvspencer22 said:
Really? This is 2011 who is having bandwidth problems that even a 50% reduction in ROM size would affect?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
smackdown85146 said:
In a way, it does. I just want to see how small somebody can make it. Downloads can be a real hassle if the ROM is gigantic. I personally think this is fun and interesting
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Downloads- and I speak for a majority- aren't a hassle in terms of ROMs. The average user can download 200mbs in about 20 minutes. ROMs are less than that.
I hate when people enter threads like this and just quickly reply--what's the point.
When you get down to it, what is the point of having more then 1 alternative ROM. Isn't the whole idea of ROMing to customize, optimize and just plain have fun with an open platform?
So to all those that said, what's the point. The point of this is FOR FUN!
Raistline said:
...what is the point of having more then 1 alternative ROM. Isn't the whole idea of ROMing to customize, optimize and just plain have fun with an open platform?...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, if Master said he can make a 4MB ROM, its most likely not going to be customizable, nor optimized.
DannyDoan said:
Well, if Master said he can make a 4MB ROM, its most likely not going to be customizable, nor optimized.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That was a joke. The point is, the base kernel image is a "rom". everything you add to that adds a little more functionality (starting with hardware). It's all a matter of what you can live without, and not everyone feels the same way. I think you'd have to spell out what you consider to be "minimum functionality."
Otherwise, if you don't want any apps, or for your phone to react in any way what-so-ever when you press buttons or touch the screen, I think I could make you something
im on 80 meg rom got slimmed from original loiki by bricked .
Just a quick stat: Less than 60% of the US has broadband, so a small ROM for those folks is probably welcome ;->
(And if they're in an area without broadband, do you really think they have solid 3G?)
psz01 said:
Just a quick stat: Less than 60% of the US has broadband, so a small ROM for those folks is probably welcome ;->
(And if they're in an area without broadband, do you really think they have solid 3G?)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let's see that statistic cross-referenced against smartphone owners.
Hi All
Can anybody tell me or have encounter such an issue where no more ROM flashing is possible if yes then after how Manny flashings.
Thanks
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA App
i flashed different croms,kernel around 40 times i think, still my sgs running buttery smooth and fast.
as long as your sgs is running,you can flash over and over again.
cheers
As often as you want. There are no limits for flash ROM. I have flashed my sgs maybe 150 times ...
To ask ... how often you can install linux on your PC?
daggi78 said:
As often as you want. There are no limits for flash ROM. I have flashed my sgs maybe 150 times ...
To ask ... how often you can install linux on your PC?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As far as i know, there is a symbolic limit to flash a device wich is not comparable to install a OS in a PC. That's because if you install linux/windows/whatever youre doing it on a hard drive, while when you flash a rom to a phone you do it over a EPROM memory. Please correct me if i'm wrong.
Yeah great guys..!!
Thanks a ton to build confidence in me --- so i can flash atlest 150 times as daggi78 has mentioned in his post.
Thanks
dk147in said:
Yeah great guys..!!
Thanks a ton to build confidence in me --- so i can flash atlest 150 times as daggi78 has mentioned in his post.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I must correct me.
fps249 is right. EPROMs can be rewritten up to 200 times, then they are consumed.
So i have to pull the break otherwise my phone is dead in a few weeks.
fps249 is right. EPROMs can be rewritten up to 200 times, then they are consumed.
So i have to pull the break otherwise my phone is dead in a few weeks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
fps249 is wrong!! then it was a damaged ROM from beginning
"the maximum number of rewrites are 1 million or more"
Source: Wikipedia @ EEPROM
Look at "Failure modes"
Ehomer said:
fps249 is wrong!! then it was a damaged ROM from beginning
"the maximum number of rewrites are 1 million or more"
Source: Wikipedia @ EEPROM
Look at "Failure modes"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you read what I wrote? I specifically said that there is a SYMBOLIC limit. By that, I mean that it's almost imposible for a person to reach that limit, but it doesn't mean it's not there. And i said that it's not the same flashing over an EPROM than installing an OS over a hard drive, wich is right.
Guys pleas don't get me confused, atleast 100 time i can flash my phone....sure...
dk147in said:
Guys pleas don't get me confused, atleast 100 time i can flash my phone....sure...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're right, sorry. Yes, you can flash at least 100 times.
Even 150 times!
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
It depends on the memory chip used, for example, a typical nand flash chip will have a data retention of 10 years and a 100 000 program/erase cycles.
Flashing is just one aspect of program/erase cycles you also have to take into account downloading and installing apps as this also counts toward the total. I'm not upto speed on the android file system but there are also what they call leveling algorithms that try and make sure that all memory cells within the flash are used evenly. If, for example, you read/write the same addresses over and over again they will wear out quicker than the rest leading to bad blocks.
Having said that, its more likely that your phone will die from other causes before it becomes a problem
No Limits
There is no limit as such...till your hardware is fine, you can continue flashing. I don't even remember the number of times i have flashed my device. Don;t worry on this one and have fun
5 lac times i think !
150 times?! it means you flash every 2 day durring a year... c'mon aren't phones meant to be used to call and message rather than flashing daily? what is the point of such practise?
ThanXXXXXXXXXXXX
thanks guyz for the gr88888 info.
"Thanks" button is your friend.
just wondering if flashing roms in a daily basis will damage my phone or not?, its true what some say that the internal memory has certain amount of flashing cycles before it dies ?
diegonnc said:
just wondering if flashing roms in a daily basis will damage my phone or not?, its true what some say that the internal memory has certain amount of flashing cycles before it dies ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hav flashed almost 100 times(probably more ) nothing happened till today.. No one reported till today!!
IMO,
The internal memory can take several flash cycles before it malfunctions.
By Several i mean your phone buttons[power/volume/home] can get damaged[due to pressing(2-3 times) while flashing] before your memory dies
My flash count will be ~500 as of now
Can someone tell me what the internal memory is made of?
EEPROM?
No
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
What ? EEPROM has such capacities at more than 100MB ?
I thought EEPROM only have small capacities like in Gameboy cartridges .
Herpderp iPad2.
No I don't care if you're anti-Apple.
It's some kind of a flash memory, like in USB Flash Drive I guess?
And yes it does have read/write limit!
Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk
KcLKcL said:
It's some kind of a flash memory, like in USB Flash Drive I guess?
And yes it does have read/write limit!
Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm willing to find that limit
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
I have flashed almost 80% custom roms present for Galaxy Ace till now. I did not face any problem. You should know in and out about how to flash roms and take backup of data, contacts, sms etc.
I don't think there is any problem.
Currently using Samsung Galaxy S-II port V.7.1 ROM by Rushash.
csifreeman said:
IMO,
The internal memory can take several flash cycles before it malfunctions.
By Several i mean your phone buttons[power/volume/home] can get damaged[due to pressing(2-3 times) while flashing] before your memory dies
My flash count will be ~500 as of now
Can someone tell me what the internal memory is made of?
EEPROM?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah i think its flash eeprom.
Sent from my Sony Tablet S using xda premium
so there is not really a clear expert answer on this, some say yes and some say no
You could potentially exceed the maximum number of writes, but you will always be able to read it in most circumstances unless you get a massive magnet it or crush your phone
On the datasheets the write limit is generally below the actual limit anyway.
Sent from Samsung Galaxy Ace
My Phone Bricked when i was downgrading from Gingerbread to Froyo ??
any help Please
Note:I post in this thread because I'm a nope to XDA
---------- Post added at 09:09 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:04 PM ----------
Add:
Screen Doesn't turn on , No Download Mode , No Recovery
Your battery is not flat by any chance?
NathanBookham said:
You could potentially exceed the maximum number of writes, but you will always be able to read it in most circumstances unless you get a massive magnet it or crush your phone
On the datasheets the write limit is generally below the actual limit anyway.
Sent from Samsung Galaxy Ace
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But I'm guessing it is a lot higher than 500?
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
karim-aly said:
My Phone Bricked when i was downgrading from Gingerbread to Froyo ??
any help Please
Note:I post in this thread because I'm a nope to XDA
---------- Post added at 09:09 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:04 PM ----------
Add:
Screen Doesn't turn on , No Download Mode , No Recovery
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You should follow chinoray's tut.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
so apparently as long as i know how to use odin and have a nice backup of my stock rom everything`s gonna be allright
I guess the rom is EEP-ROM. Assuming you flash 1 rom per day(after doing wipe data and cache), it takes approximately about 3 years for any signs of data corruption to appear. Even when data corruption does begin to appear, you probably wont notice it for a long time. So its nothing to worry about unless you flash more than one rom per day everyday without fail
scoffyburito said:
But I'm guessing it is a lot higher than 500?
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Something crazy like 250,000 writes!
Sent from Samsung Galaxy Ace
I think the correct term is really a flash memory (Flash EEPROM). at least i think that was the type used in S2 and others.
"Although flash memory is technically a type of EEPROM, the term "EEPROM" is generally used to refer specifically to non-flash EEPROM which is erasable in small blocks, typically bytes."
either way, i think samsung uses the SLC NAND flash who's life cycle is rated at 100k cycles
i flashed my Nexus a lot of times. no issues yet. but again everything has an expiry date so eventually flash memory will take a hit.
So I just order some of these exhibits for my family as they are not power users and the spec seem pretty decent considering they even have a dual core but this is the phone I ordered.
http://www.phonearena.com/phones/Samsung-Galaxy-Exhibit_id7690
Which looks different from the exhibits that you guys have here. Im trying to figure out where tonget info on rooting and recoveries for this new exhibit, could anyone help me out?
Joe333x said:
So I just order some of these exhibits for my family as they are not power users and the spec seem pretty decent considering they even have a dual core but this is the phone I ordered.
http://www.phonearena.com/phones/Samsung-Galaxy-Exhibit_id7690
Which looks different from the exhibits that you guys have here. Im trying to figure out where tonget info on rooting and recoveries for this new exhibit, could anyone help me out?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its the new t599 and there isn't anyone developing for it yet. To bad too its a nice phone.
schuylkillparanormal said:
Its the new t599 and there isn't anyone developing for it yet. To bad too its a nice phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wonder if the root method for your phone will work for this phone. Do you guys use odin on your devices?
Just incase anyone else looks here for the same info I was looking for. With the help of now knowing the model #. I was able to find some dev info in the S3 mini section.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2421743&highlight=root
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2407389
Joe333x said:
I wonder if the root for your phone will work for this phone. Do you guys use odin on your devices?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
T679 and t559 has different boot image along with the s3 mini its a long shot bit you can try that apk root tool for the samsung vibrate even superoneclick most likley not but you never know.
schuylkillparanormal said:
T679 and t559 has different boot image along with the s3 mini its a long shot bit you can try that apk root tool for the samsung vibrate even superoneclick most likley not but you never know.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Those two links I posted above are for the t599 just they are in the s3 mini forum. The t599 already has root and cwm working. Xda just sucks for making forums for things so people end up making threads in forums for other devices.
Joe333x said:
Those two links I posted above are for the t599 just they are in the s3 mini forum. The t599 already has root and cwm working.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good to know do they have any custom roms yet?
schuylkillparanormal said:
Good to know do they have any custom roms yet?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Reading through the thread the same person that got cwm working is building cm10 for it. Since these are devices are for my family though im just happy there is cwm for backups and root for deleting bloat for them.
Joe333x said:
Reading through the thread the same person that got cwm working is building cm10 for it. Since these are devices are for my family though im just happy there is cwm for backups and root for deleting bloat for them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hear you. I'm glad someone is developing for it.
Dual core processor and double the ram but kept the small 1500 mAh battery, that sucks
Sent from my SGH-T679 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
mwhitt said:
Dual core processor and double the ram but kept the small 1500 mAh battery, that sucks
Sent from my SGH-T679 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know what your thinking but it actualy gets good battery life.
mwhitt said:
Dual core processor and double the ram but kept the small 1500 mAh battery, that sucks
Sent from my SGH-T679 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thats the problem with battery technology. It hasnt advanced at all. The only way to make a battery with more power is to increase its size. The best battery life I have ever had is with my current device, the note 2. Its huge and powerful but because its so big they can put a large battery in it. Smaller devices how ever will always be stuck with small batteries. I wish that someone would say "ok phones are extremely powerful, now maybe we should look into making batteries able to hold more juice without making them larger. "
Joe333x said:
Thats the problem with battery technology. It hasnt advanced at all. The only way to make a battery with more power is to increase its size. The best battery life I have ever had is with my current device, the note 2. Its huge and powerful but because its so big they can put a large battery in it. Smaller devices how ever will always be stuck with small batteries. I wish that someone would say "ok phones are extremely powerful, now maybe we should look into making batteries able to hold more juice without making them larger. "
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They did in the moto x
schuylkillparanormal said:
Its the new t599 and there isn't anyone developing for it yet. To bad too its a nice phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You sure theres no developement I have cwm and cwm touch and source code. Cm hangs on logo so I am happy. I know the guy posted the links just spreading the news for people who may want this device. It's pretty nice though.
Unjustified Dev said:
You sure theres no developement I have cwm and cwm touch and source code. Cm hangs on logo so I am happy. I know the guy posted the links just spreading the news for people who may want this device. It's pretty nice though.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's cwm and root and there making cm10 in the s3 mini section.
schuylkillparanormal said:
There's cwm and root and there making cm10 in the s3 mini section.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm the person doing it LOL :laugh: