Database Develop

How come...

How come the Kaiser's Hero port runs faster than Hero runs on my phone?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8xVYcFZiYgE
Seriously, what did they do to make it that responsive?

ivanmmj said:
How come the Kaiser's Hero port runs faster than Hero runs on my phone?
Seriously, what did they do to make it that responsive?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe it has something to do with the fast that the Tilt has 256mb of RAM while the G1 has only 192. But that's my guess.
CORRECTED DUE TO MIS-READ AND MISUNDERSTOOD INFORMATION.

Most likely the reason above. ANyone know the specs of the processor?

alritewhadeva said:
Most likely the reason above. ANyone know the specs of the processor?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
G1:
Processor Qualcomm® MSM7201A™, 528 MHz
Tilt:
Qualcomm MSM7200, 400Mhz processor
Ref: http://www.htc.com/us/support_select_product.aspx
I actually stand corrected.
Here are the ACTUAL specs...
G1:
CPU: 32 bit Qualcomm MSM7201A
CPU Clock: 528 MHz
CPU Core: ARM1136EJ-S
Instruction set: ARMv6
Level 1 cache: No information
Level 2 cache: No information
Memory, Storage capacity
RAM type: mobile DDR SDRAM
RAM capacity: 192 MiB
ROM type: Flash EEPROM
ROM capacity: 256 MiB
Tilt:
32 bit Qualcomm MSM7200
400 MHz
ARM1136EJ-S
ARMv6
No information
No information
SDRAM
128 MiB , 101.38MiB accessible
Flash EEPROM
256 MiB, 124.66MiB accessible
Not supported
124.66 MiB
Not supported
So it seems that I was mistaken in my previous and premature post above and it seems that the G1 has more RAM.
Perhaps it's because Hero at this time requires data to be read off the SDCARD which is slower then build in memory?
ref: http://pdadb.net/index.php?m=pdacomparer&id1=861&id2=1908

Binary100100 said:
G1:
Processor Qualcomm® MSM7201A™, 528 MHz
Tilt:
Qualcomm MSM7200, 400Mhz processor
Ref: http://www.htc.com/us/support_select_product.aspx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but isnt it running on top of the native windows mobile system?

No, they're running it completely off the SDCard.
As far as running on top of WM, it doesn't, it just kicks WM out of RAM and takes over.

Kernal 2.6.38 from Huawei

Any use of this?
http://www.huaweidevice.com/worldwi...=toDownloadFile&flay=software&softid=NDU5NTk=
Sent from my U9000 using XDA

that's not for u9000 but for u8815.

chrillefr said:
Any use of this?
http://www.huaweidevice.com/worldwi...=toDownloadFile&flay=software&softid=NDU5NTk=
Sent from my U9000 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know, but there are wizards around this place making magic out of nothing ...
Sent from my U9000 using XDA

chrillefr said:
I know, but there are wizards around this place making magic out of nothing ...
Sent from my U9000 using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Still, very close in hardware:
Datasheet+Views: 9268 views since addition of datasheet (March 04, 2012)
Datasheet-State: Preliminary specifications
Releaseate: March, 2012
Project-Codename: Huawei U8815
Browse all devices under Huawei U8815 codename
Dimensions: 63 x 122.5 x 10.5 millimetres
Mass: 140 grams (battery included)
Software_Environment
Embedded_Operating_System: Google Android 2.3.6
Browse devices running this OS
Microprocessor,;Chipset
CPU+Clock: 1000 MHz
CPU: Qualcomm MSM7227A
Browse devices based on this microprocessor
Memory,;Storage;capacity
RAM-capacity: 512 MiB (accessible: 393 MiB)
ROM-capacity: 3.7 GiB (accessible: 2.4 GiB)
Display
Display:Type: Supported
Displayiagonal: 4 "
Display-Resolution: 480 x 800
Sound
Microphone(s): stereo
Loudspeaker(s): mono
Audio:Output: 3.5mm
Cellular;Phone
Cellular;Networks: GSM850, GSM900, GSM1800, GSM1900, UMTS900 (B8), UMTS2100 (B1)
Cellular-Data-Links: GPRS, EDGE, UMTS, HSDPA, HSUPA
Call-Alert: 64 -chord melody
Vibrating_Alert: Supported
Speakerphone-: Supported
Control_Peripherals
Positioning_Device: Multi-touch screen
Primary+Keyboard: Not supported
Directional-Pad: Not supported
Scroll_Wheel: Not supported
Interfaces
Expansion_Slots: microSD, microSDHC, TransFlash
USB: USB 2.0 client, 480Mbit/s
micro-USB
Bluetooth: Bluetooth 2.1 + EDR
Wireless_LAN: 802.11b, 802.11g, 802.11n
Infrared_Gate: Not supported
Multimedia;Telecommunication
Analog_Radio;Receiver: FM radio (76-90MHz) with RDS
Digital+Media-Broadcast+Tuner: Not supported
Satellite;Navigation
Built-in;GPS;module: Supported
Complementary_GPS_Services: Assisted GPS, QuickGPS, Geotagging
Built-in+Digital_Camera
Main+Camera: 5 MP
Autofocus-(AF): Supported
Optical_Zoom: 1 x
Macro:Mode: Supported
Built-in_Flash: mobile light (LED)
Additionaletails
Built-in_accelerometer: Supported
Battery: removable
Battery;Capacity: 1500 mAh

A little wiki help: post the CPU/GPU for our devices

I'd like the wikipedia pages to be correct for our devices, but I recently learned that what I figured was the definitive source, the Sony WhitePages for each device is actually wrong for the LT30p. Which makes me suspect on the accuracy for the other Blue devices. Based on the specs of the snapdragon SOCs I believe I already know the real answers, but would like proof.
I already have the T (LT30p), so I am asking if someone with a V (LT25i) , TX (LT29i), a TL (LT30at) and if anyone actually possesses it the elusive LTE version of the T (LT30a) could attach a screenshot for their device from the first screen of CPU Indentifier
Thanks!

LT30p
Here is the screenshot for a LT30p Xperia T

http://www.gsmarena.com/sony_xperia_t_lte-5015.php

heres mine an Xperia TL(att) running xperiment 3.5
Here is a screenshot of my xperia tl running xperiment 3.5

Xperia TX (LT29i)

Ok, here's my Xperia T
I didn't know that Xperia T could have two different CPU (Snapdragon 8960 and 8260)or maybe MIUI is ****ing with me :V

... and my lt30a...

http://www-support-downloads.sonymobile.com/lt30/whitepaper_EN_lt30p_xperia_t.pdf
In White Paper from Sony site we have this info: 1.5 GHz Qualcomm Krait MSM8960 Dual Core
It was changed sometime ago, in previous version was MSM8260A

Well, the only notable difference between 8260 and 8960 is LTE support.

Gasai Yuno said:
Well, the only notable difference between 8260 and 8960 is LTE support.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
8260A in the LT30p to be exact. Confusing naming scheme, the 8260 is the older (non-Krait) SoC used in the xperia s.
Sent from my LT30p using XDA Premium 4 mobile app

Gasai Yuno said:
Well, the only notable difference between 8260 and 8960 is LTE support.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So my Xperia T has LTE support? What's the point of the TL then?

MSM8260 45 nm ARMv7 1.7 GHz Dual-core Scorpion L2: 512 KB Adreno 220 Single-channel 500 MHz ISM/333 MHz LPDDR2 GSM (GPRS, EDGE), W-CDMA/UMTS (HSDPA, HSUPA, HSPA+), MBMS
MSM8960 28 nm ARMv7 1.7 GHz Dual-core Krait L0: 4KB+4KB, L1: 16KB+16KB, L2: 1 MB Adreno 225 (WUXGA/1080p) Dual-channel 500 MHz LPDDR2 BT 4.0, 802.11a/b/g/n (2.4/5 GHz), World Mode (LTE FDD/TDD CAT3, SVLTE-DB, TD-SCDMA, Rel9 DC-HSPA+, GSM/GPRS/EDGE, EGAL, 1× Adv., 1× EV-DO Rev. A/B)
read this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snapdragon_(system_on_chip)

RpRAUC said:
MSM826045 nmARMv7 1.7 GHz Dual-core ScorpionL2: 512 KBAdreno 220Single-channel 500 MHz ISM/333 MHz LPDDR2GSM (GPRS, EDGE), W-CDMA/UMTS (HSDPA, HSUPA, HSPA+), MBMS
MSM896028 nmARMv7 1.7 GHz Dual-core KraitL0: 4KB+4KB, L1: 16KB+16KB, L2: 1 MBAdreno 225 (WUXGA/1080p)Dual-channel 500 MHz LPDDR2BT 4.0, 802.11a/b/g/n (2.4/5 GHz), World Mode (LTE FDD/TDD CAT3, SVLTE-DB, TD-SCDMA, Rel9 DC-HSPA+, GSM/GPRS/EDGE, EGAL, 1× Adv., 1× EV-DO Rev. A/B)
read this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snapdragon_(system_on_chip)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wrong, there's quite a big difference between MSM8260 and MSM8260a that can be found in Xperia T. The first one is S3 series and second one S4 series... And a lot more, try to google a bit...

Quoting your own link;
MSM8260A 28 nm LP ARMv7 Up to 1.5 GHz dual-core Krait L0: 4 KB + 4 KB, L1: 16 KB + 16 KB, L2: 1 MB Adreno 225 (WUXGA/1080p) Dual-channel 500 MHz LPDDR2 Bluetooth 4.0, 802.11n
(2.4/5 GHz), GSM (GPRS, EDGE), UMTS (DC-HSPA+, TD-SCDMA)
http://www.qualcomm.com/snapdragon/processors/s4/specs
Because we're talking about MSM8260A, not MSM8260.
http://system-on-a-chip.findthebest.com/l/291/Qualcomm-Snapdragon-MSM8260A
http://system-on-a-chip.findthebest.com/l/286/Qualcomm-Snapdragon-MSM8960

Gasai Yuno said:
Quoting your own link;
MSM8260A 28 nm LP ARMv7 Up to 1.5 GHz dual-core Krait L0: 4 KB + 4 KB, L1: 16 KB + 16 KB, L2: 1 MB Adreno 225 (WUXGA/1080p) Dual-channel 500 MHz LPDDR2 Bluetooth 4.0, 802.11n
(2.4/5 GHz), GSM (GPRS, EDGE), UMTS (DC-HSPA+, TD-SCDMA)
http://www.qualcomm.com/snapdragon/processors/s4/specs
Because we're talking about MSM8260A, not MSM8260.
http://system-on-a-chip.findthebest.com/l/291/Qualcomm-Snapdragon-MSM8260A
http://system-on-a-chip.findthebest.com/l/286/Qualcomm-Snapdragon-MSM8960
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yep, and for the record, here is the Qualcomm Snapdragon S1/S2/S3/S4 comparison chart straight from the horses mouth: http://www.qualcomm.com/sites/default/files/common/products-services/snapdragon_specs_9-12.pdf

Krauser Kahn said:
So my Xperia T has LTE support? What's the point of the TL then?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The TL is the AT&T branded version.
According to the Sony whitepaper (which doesn't seem to be always right), it was limited in the LTE bands it could access, but I have a feeling this was just a result of its baseband flash and nothing to do with the actual hardware.

[Review] Note 4 SM-910C & SM-910S

Galaxy Note 4 SM-910C(Exynos) and Galaxy Note 4 SM-910S(Snap Dragon)​
The Samsung Galaxy Note 4 is at last official and the following thing we're holding up for is the official release date.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Quick Review:
The display does not shock us as various leaks had officially uncovered that Galaxy Note 4 would accompany a 5.7inch Super AMOLED displays screen which upholds QHD resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
As we had said before it supports 515ppi. The presentation certainly seems rich and brilliant however the QHD determination does not appear to be the main real motivation to buy for Note 4.
Outline :
Weighing 6.2 ounces, the Note 4 is heavier than the 5.9-ounce Note 3. The extra robustness is at any rate part of the way because of the Note 4′s metal edge, however the back is still a delicate touch plastic. Samsung selected an all-plastic chassis on the Note 3. The Note 4 is likewise somewhat taller and thicker than its ancestor (6.04 x 3.09 x 0.33 inches vs. 6 x 3.1 x 0.3 inches).
Cameras:
The Note 4 steps up the back camera's resolution from 13 MP to 16 MP, however that’s not the only improvement. Samsung added in optical image stabilization (OIS), which is incredible at capturing shots enduring as you zoom in. The organization claims you'll have the capacity to zoom up to 8x and still get a sharp pic.
Samsung has made its phablet more selfie-friendly, boosting the front camera's megapixel number from 2 MP on the Note 3 to 3.7 MP on the Note 4, while conveying a 90-degree wide-edge lens. You can go significantly more extensive than that, however you'll have to enter an extraordinary mode.
Spen:
Not at all like alternate telephones, Samsung's Galaxy Note family likewise offers a stylus, or S Pen, which has additionally been enhanced on the Galaxy Note 4. The new S Pen offers consumers a "significantly more credible pen experience," as per Samsung, and can even copy composition on paper with a wellspring or calligraphy pen.
Battery:
That battery is pretty much the same size as Note 3, however Samsung says it will charge to 50 percent in 30 minutes because of Qualcomm's Quickcharge engineering. That said, I'm concerned the denser screen will lead the Galaxy Note 4 to have shorter general battery life than the enduring Galaxy Note 3.
Here is my View post your views and thoughts below.

i
because of ARMv8 & 64-Bit processors
+
Octa-Cores that work simultaneously
+
(i m not sure) better RAM bandwidth!
I prefer Exynos

Not very sure with which version I'll go for, but I seem to like Exynos, due to the HMP and lower clocked companion cores for battery life too
Also I'm to some extent familiar with the architecture of Exynos chips, so maybe it'll come in help while practicing development, but maybe I can learn about the Snapdragons too, the main thing I like about Krait architecture is the per core voltage control and dynamic body voltage adjustment on hardware level.

Is the Exynos better then the Snapdragon ?
Sent from my SM-N900

Where is the review ?

SamLayer said:
Is the Exynos better then the Snapdragon ?
Sent from my SM-N900
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
SD is much better when compared to exynos
Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk

bala_gamer said:
Where is the review ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Above in the OP lol.
Sent from my GT-N7100 using Tapatalk

This time the Exynos 5433 is much powerful and faster as compared to Snapdragon 805 variant. The exynos is capable of running all the eight cores simultaneously unlike the previous version in Note 3. Morever Exynos's LTE modem is of Cat 6 category whereas that of Snapdragon is Cat 4. Exynos is equipped with a 64 bit processor whereas the SD with 32 bit. Exynos also marks higher on the Antutu Benchmark. Therefore 910c is the killer variant this time!
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk

MoonSTRuK said:
This time the Exynos 5433 is much powerful and faster as compared to Snapdragon 805 variant. The exynos is capable of running all the eight cores simultaneously unlike the previous version in Note 3. Morever Exynos's LTE modem is of Cat 6 category whereas that of Snapdragon is Cat 4. Exynos is equipped with a 64 bit processor whereas the SD with 32 bit. Exynos also marks higher on the Antutu Benchmark. Therefore 910c is the killer variant this time!
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, the Exynos has Cat4. while the Snapdragon has Cat6. Also, people are quite skeptical of the Exynos being 64 bit, in spite of the superior performance.

My bad! Yes you are right. ....Exynos is actually Cat 4.....I got confused between C and S. Thanks for the correction
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk

MoonSTRuK said:
My bad! Yes you are right. ....Exynos is actually Cat 4.....I got confused between C and S. Thanks for the correction
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem, Samsung has a nag for playing with the specs of a single version, so it's bound to get confusing. Here are the 2 possible specs at the moment:
1.
CPU: Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 (SM-N910S), Quad-core 2.7 GHz Krait 450, 32 bit.
GPU: Adreno 420
LTE: Cat6
2.
CPU: Exynos 5433 (SM-N910C), Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 1.9GHz quad-core Cortex-A57 (Possibly 64 bit, most likely 32 bit).
GPU: Mali-T760
LTE: Cat4

Dat Noob said:
No problem, Samsung has a nag for playing with the specs of a single version, so it's bound to get confusing. Here are the 2 possible specs at the moment:
1.
CPU: Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 (SM-N910S), Quad-core 2.7 GHz Krait 450, 32 bit.
GPU: Adreno 420
LTE: Cat6
2.
CPU: Exynos 5433 (SM-N910C), Quad-core 1.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 1.9GHz quad-core Cortex-A57 (Possibly 64 bit, most likely 32 bit).
GPU: Mali-T760
LTE: Cat4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exynos5 (Exynos5433) - 32-bit. Series Exynos6 & Exynos7 - 64-bit

Pako7 said:
Exynos5 (Exynos5433) - 32-bit. Series Exynos6 & Exynos7 - 64-bit
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How do we know which one is 64 bit among the exynos versions? What model would it be? I read the Antutu's benchmark tests a couple of days ago before the launching of Note 4. It compared the Exynos and the Snapdragon versions. Exynos was found to be superior. I wonder if same results would be maintained after the official launch?
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
---------- Post added at 02:43 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:41 PM ----------
Or note 4 would not have a 64 bit version at all?
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk

MoonSTRuK said:
How do we know which one is 64 bit among the exynos versions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
from source code in vger.kernel.org

Pako7 said:
Exynos5 (Exynos5433) - 32-bit. Series Exynos6 & Exynos7 - 64-bit
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I thought the same, but it seems that it is really 64 bit. Some information in Geekbench showed an internal "version" code for A57 cores. Maybe Samsung decided to not tell anything about it's 64 bit design because the S805 is still 32bit and they don't want to bother the users that buy the Qualcomm version. Hav read an interesting article about that. Will search for the link

SaschaHa said:
I thought the same, but it seems that it is really 64 bit. Some information in Geekbench showed an internal "version" code for A57 cores.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I already know about GB
Maybe Samsung decided to not tell anything about it's 64 bit design because the S805 is still 32bit and they don't want to bother the users that buy the Qualcomm version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think so too

1st Review out from Russia of SM-910C model (Exynos)
http://translate.google.com/transla...dbox=0&usg=ALkJrhhH_KG0kFV6aV7xO0DNHZMnsDIABQ
OIS in action vs GS5:
Improved low light photos, samples in the article. Dynamic range looks good.
GN4 vs GN3:
GN4 vs GS5:
NOTE: The benchmark scores look little less than what we have seen. Nothing to worry. I am sure the Geekbench test he ran is for this result: http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/811052
This is the lowest number in the Geekbench database, and rest all others are much higher.
http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekbench3/search?dir=desc&q=universal5433&sort=score

I don't get it guys... Which one comes with 4G?
I want to buy this phone by pre order at some online store in indonesia, 8.999.000 in rupiah
In the specification tab, they doesn't mentioned 4G.. Only 3G with hexa core(i think its exynos)
Which series comes with 4G?
Thanks

ciklek said:
I don't get it guys... Which one comes with 4G?
I want to buy this phone by pre order at some online store in indonesia, 8.999.000 in rupiah
In the specification tab, they doesn't mentioned 4G.. Only 3G with hexa core(i think its exynos)
Which series comes with 4G?
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Almost all the versions come with 4G. I think just the N910H doesn't.
There is no hexacore model, take care.

Lodix said:
Almost all the versions come with 4G. I think just the N910H doesn't.
There is no hexacore model, take care.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ohh sorry, i meant octa core. 1.9 GHz Octa Core Processor (1.9 GHz Quad + 1.3 GHz Quad core) and 2.5G (GSM/GPRS/EDGE) : 850/900/1800/1900 MHz | 3G (HSPA+ 42Mbps): 850/900/1900/2100 MHz
Really? so the note 4 mentioned above is N910H version? There's no specific processor mentioned, just like that one above...

Enable ANT+

I'm looking to know if is possible to enable ant+ on Droid Turbo, actually I don't know if the wireless chips is ant+ compatible of if there is a ROM with ant+ already enalbed.
Thanks

ntnmst said:
I'm looking to know if is possible to enable ant+ on Droid Turbo, actually I don't know if the wireless chips is ant+ compatible of if there is a ROM with ant+ already enalbed.
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this page says the Snapdragon 805 is ANT+.
https://www.quora.com/Which-is-faster-the-Mediatek-MT6595-octa-core-or-the-Snapdragon-805-Quad-core
Qualcomm Snapdragon 805 is a 32-bit ARMv7A based SoC made using 28nm HPm process technology.
It is a quad-core SoC with 4x Krait 450 processors clocked at upto 2.7GHz. Krait 450 is a bug-free update of Krait 400 which is based on ARM Cortex-A15.
Adreno 420 GPU
Cat. 6 LTE
802.11ac, Bluetooth 4.1 LE, ANT+
Upto 4K HD (3840 x 2160) display controller
Upto 55MP image signal processor
H.265 4K video record & playback
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Motorola Quarks have Snapdragon 805. The Droid Turbo is a Quark.
But I don't know whether any custom ROMs for Quarks like CM12.1 or Resurrection Remix have that feature.
CM12 did NOT support ANT+, but I don't know about current 12.1. Here's the request:
http://forum.cyanogenmod.org/topic/104511-missing-ant-support/

ChazzMatt said:
this page says the Snapdragon 805 is ANT+.
https://www.quora.com/Which-is-faster-the-Mediatek-MT6595-octa-core-or-the-Snapdragon-805-Quad-core
Motorola Quarks have Snapdragon 805. The Droid Turbo is a Quark.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think is not so easy... wireless chip is different from SoC
http://forum.xda-developers.com/hardware-hacking/hardware/ref-devices-ant-hardware-t2879990
and to understand if is possible to enable ant+ the first thing is to know the chip model & vendor
https://github.com/ant-wireless/ANT_in_Android
I do some search on the net, but without success

ntnmst said:
I think is not so easy... wireless chip is different from SoC
http://forum.xda-developers.com/hardware-hacking/hardware/ref-devices-ant-hardware-t2879990
and to understand if is possible to enable ant+ the first thing is to know the chip model & vendor
https://github.com/ant-wireless/ANT_in_Android
I do some search on the net, but without success
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM12 did NOT support ANT+, but I don't know about current 12.1. Here's the request from last February :
http://forum.cyanogenmod.org/topic/104511-missing-ant-support/