Related
Can we port the Android 4.0 IceCream to Samsung S5570 Galaxy Mini
use SDK or AOSP?
Update: Its actualy but now we have CyanogenMOD9 (Android 4.0) for Samsung GT-S5570 Galaxy Mini ported by SQUADZONE
Every day the same question?
Never happy?
If it will be possible, will be possible
All the best :beer:
Inviato dal mio GT-S5570 usando Tapatalk
AntiBillOS said:
Can we port the Android 4.0 IceCream to Samsung S5570 Galaxy Mini
use SDK or AOSP?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wrong section, if have question go to general thread, this is dev thread..
SDK is armv7. I will compile AOSP when I figure out how to do it for armv6.
TheWhisp said:
SDK is armv7. I will compile AOSP when I figure out how to do it for armv6.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Сan we use old kern version(2.6.xx.x) on Android 4.0?
AntiBillOS said:
Сan we use old kern version(2.6.xx.x) on Android 4.0?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No
Inviato dal mio GT-S5570 usando Tapatalk
AntiBillOS said:
Сan we use old kern version(2.6.xx.x) on Android 4.0?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think Mini's 2.6.35.7 would do.
TheWhisp said:
I think Mini's 2.6.35.7 would do.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i think not, lib are different
I see on YouTube Android 4.0 ICS ported to LG GT540 (Arm v6)
here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V1_OpwI-Ybo&feature=related
and here http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=npOm6ObhT3g
why ??????
have on galaxy mini
It is possible to compile for armv5, and as far as I know armv5 is compatible with armv6. I don't have enough powerful PC to do that (it would take like 30-40h to compile on my PC). So maybe someone could do that.
kaizone said:
here
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V1_OpwI-Ybo&feature=related
and here http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&v=npOm6ObhT3g
why ??????
have on galaxy mini
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Because it's not easy....the source is not complete to just build a functional ROM, the libraries...but of course can be done.
And I could be wrong.
TheWhisp said:
It is possible to compile for armv5, and as far as I know armv5 is compatible with armv6. I don't have enough powerful PC to do that (it would take like 30-40h to compile on my PC). So maybe someone could do that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Btw I read u were working on a port...how is it going?
And what is the ram on ur PC? So then I'll decide if it is possible for me to take a dive into deep sea or not.
I tried to compile it, but got an error. But I guess boot.img compiled successfuly. So I took a system.img from Hero (hero is armv5 device) but unfortunately something was wrong with my updater-script and I couldn't flash it.
TheWhisp said:
I tried to compile it, but got an error. But I guess boot.img compiled successfuly. So I took a system.img from Hero (hero is armv5 device) but unfortunately something was wrong with my updater-script and I couldn't flash it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you tell as how to compile it?
TheWhisp said:
I tried to compile it, but got an error. But I guess boot.img compiled successfuly. So I took a system.img from Hero (hero is armv5 device) but unfortunately something was wrong with my updater-script and I couldn't flash it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe our developers can help! Y not ask them about these probs.?
My pc is for your disposal
I have my pc
16gb ram
amd phoenom 2 x4 processor 3.01ghz
1.5TB 7200 rpm hdd
windows 7 x64 enterprise
what is needed to be done send on my pc it is for the good of ICS samsung galaxy mini
prateek.maac said:
I have my pc
16gb ram
amd phoenom 2 x4 processor 3.01ghz
1.5TB 7200 rpm hdd
windows 7 x64 enterprise
what is needed to be done send on my pc it is for the good of ICS samsung galaxy mini
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First you need Linux Ubuntu)))
Not ubuntu specificly. You just need a linux distribution. I actually decided to start the porting this thursday. But since he has a better pc. He will do it faster.
Sent from my GT-S5570 using Tapatalk
Netas3k said:
Not ubuntu specificly. You just need a linux distribution. I actually decided to start the porting this thursday. But since he has a better pc. He will do it faster.
Sent from my GT-S5570 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you want to start development do it. Don't just give childish reasons.
And if not don't talk about it.
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda premium
Hi All,
i am not a developer and found this link which is having kernel 3.X.X.X drivers, so i thought they may be ICS drivers for Tegra 2 Ventana board, so can some one who is have knowledge on the Kernel please validate these drivers...
By using these drivers can we have H/W acceleration with ICS/JB...
Link:http://www.nvidia.com/content/devzone/linux-for-tegra.html
Cool thread : D
Sent from my LG-P990 using xda app-developers app
i dont know about that, but our board isnt a ventana board, it is a lg star board. ventana is a model of tegra 2
skylinegt77 said:
i dont know about that, but our board isnt a ventana board, it is a lg star board. ventana is a model of tegra 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
*Facepalm*
Optimus 2X uses Tegra 2 AP20H chip, and that is Ventana.
Sent from that Atrix.
Hi, unfortunately are the drivers for linux
tatperson said:
*Facepalm*
Optimus 2X uses Tegra 2 AP20H chip, and that is Ventana.
Sent from that Atrix.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thank you for your facepalm just before you confirm what i just said... loooool
tatperson said:
*Facepalm*
Optimus 2X uses Tegra 2 AP20H chip, and that is Ventana.
Sent from that Atrix.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, as far as I know, Android uses slightly modified Linux kernel. Starting from 3.X.X Linus T. started to include Android code into Linux. Anyway, conclusion is that provided code and binaries probably can be used to build fully-functional kernel for ICS, but it would be quite hard task and need a lot of effort. If LG will provide theirs plan to don't upgrade O2X, it looks reasonable to start such project, until that happened it can be waste of time.
skylinegt77 said:
thank you for your facepalm just before you confirm what i just said... loooool
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're welcome!
Sent from that Atrix.
frantic777 said:
Well, as far as I know, Android uses slightly modified Linux kernel. Starting from 3.X.X Linus T. started to include Android code into Linux. Anyway, conclusion is that provided code and binaries probably can be used to build fully-functional kernel for ICS, but it would be quite hard task and need a lot of effort. If LG will provide theirs plan to don't upgrade O2X, it looks reasonable to start such project, until that happened it can be waste of time.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So do you think it will be very hard for kernel developers to include these drives in the 3.X.X kernel ...
mj.vikram said:
So do you think it will be very hard for kernel developers to include these drives in the 3.X.X kernel ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Obviously, it may need to develop kind of adapters between provided drivers and interfaces required by ICS. Unfortunately, I'm not aware of details regarding interaction between android (dalvik) and kernel, but according to my understanding it is possible.
Hello!
I can work with source codes on windows?
Use wubi, fast and simple
Sent from my Nexus 4
WUBI
I tryed this, but isn't work.
WUBI? FAIL!!!
You will never set up a build environment using wubi.
Install linux properly if you want to code. If you can't setup linux then you are doomed. It's easier to install than windows.
You need case sensitive filesystem to work with android source (the ntfs not good for this work). If you too lazy to make a linux partion or use virtualbox for a linux install, better if you not want to play with the source...
Sent from my E15i using xda app-developers app
virtualbox uses too much resource imo. better if op makes a linux partition if he wants windows on his system. just an observation.
Just because i don't doesn't mean i can't.
Source Code
Ok! I install the Linux mint!
ssk73 said:
Ok! I install the Linux mint!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
u should probably go with linux ubuntu 12.04 LTS
its working good for me
Ubuntu
My pc is very bad, and don't start the ubuntu. Error: Bad graphics (or similar)
CtrlAltDelIrl said:
WUBI? FAIL!!!
You will never set up a build environment using wubi.
Install linux properly if you want to code. If you can't setup linux then you are doomed. It's easier to install than windows.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
linux is better than windows , especially on coding ~
Ubuntu is the best!
But if you have bad PC you can't start developing.
I have 1GB of RAM memory and 1,6Ghz Atom and i can't build properly.
I have to use buildbox server
Please donate me! The X8 is...old mobile. I want to buy new telephone (Sony Xperia J/U or Samsung Galaxy Nexus/SII)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How about you donate a phone to a real dev. You've got balls little boy.
You can't code, you can't install linux but you want us to donate you a phone!!
Go out and play - come back when you grow up.
kovacslaszlo13 said:
Ubuntu is the best!
But if you have bad PC you can't start developing.
I have 1GB of RAM memory and 1,6Ghz Atom and i can't build properly.
I have to use buildbox server
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine is intel pentium3 700Mhz with 1GB ram... awful
Sent from my E15i using xda premium
syahazu said:
Mine is intel pentium3 700Mhz with 1GB ram... awful
Sent from my E15i using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And build is work or not?Or just slow?
For me it's unusable
CtrlAltDelIrl said:
Quote:
Please donate me! The X8 is...old mobile. I want to buy new telephone (Sony Xperia J/U or Samsung Galaxy Nexus/SII)
How about you donate a phone to a real dev. You've got balls little boy.
You can't code, you can't install linux but you want us to donate you a phone!!
Go out and play - come back when you grow up.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bro you say big truth!
kovacslaszlo13 said:
And build is work or not?Or just slow?
For me it's unusable
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The kernel compiling working without any problem, just need extreme big patience on a 700MHz p3 machine (and on 1,6GHz atom too, looks like the atom is two times faster if we see the clocks, but the reality... due the sh!t design and the in-order execution pipelines the old p3 sometime faster than the atom... )
The rom compiling is another business, for compile gb need at least 1,5-2 gb ram, for 4.0+ you need at least 3+ gb ram to prevent lot of compiling errors due the low ram.
And while the kernel compiling not need any special packages, just an arm compiler (now checked, the latest codesourcery 4.7.2 runs on ubuntu 8, fedora 6, and lot of old distro), the rom compiling need lot of packages what require newer disto (I can suggest use at least ubuntu 10+/debian 6+/suse 10+/fedora 15+)
pilu1978 said:
The kernel compiling working without any problem, just need extreme big patience on a 700MHz p3 machine (and on 1,6GHz atom too, looks like the atom is two times faster if we see the clocks, but the reality... due the sh!t design and the in-order execution pipelines the old p3 sometime faster than the atom... )
The rom compiling is another business, for compile gb need at least 1,5-2 gb ram, for 4.0+ you need at least 3+ gb ram to prevent lot of compiling errors due the low ram.
And while the kernel compiling not need any special packages, just an arm compiler (now checked, the latest codesourcery 4.7.2 runs on ubuntu 8, fedora 6, and lot of old distro), the rom compiling need lot of packages what require newer disto (I can suggest use at least ubuntu 10+/debian 6+/suse 10+/fedora 15+)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are good in kernel compileing?
Because i want to learn it!
And i can use good buildmachine with ssh
I started with debian 2.1 near 15 years ago, so I have few linux experience...
Sent from my E15i using xda app-developers app
kovacslaszlo13 said:
You are good in kernel compileing?
Because i want to learn it!
And i can use good buildmachine with ssh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
iirc, pilu is a programmer (am i right?). and he's worked on some projects in the past. if you get him to teach you, you're a lucky man.
you can also alsk sgt.meow or ferneoh for tips.
Just because i don't doesn't mean i can't.
cascabel said:
iirc, pilu is a programmer (am i right?). and he's worked on some projects in the past. if you get him to teach you, you're a lucky man.
you can also alsk sgt.meow or ferneoh for tips.
Just because i don't doesn't mean i can't.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry i'm new in X8 forums (i have SK17i) so i just see that he is hungarian :victory:
But i don't know anything
Sorry again for my question
@cascabel: you are right. But my target platform is x86 and windows, not arm and android. Now my 99% of arm/android works related to my new toy: a dragonboard s4 plus developer board...
Sent from my E15i using xda app-developers app
I want to learn and build custom rom using ubuntu 13.04 but i dont want to install ubuntu in my laptop. can i use virtual machine ( VirtualBox or VMware) to set up build environment and compile the rom? My Laptop Specs is intel core i5-2430m with 6gb ddr3 ram.. is these specs suitable to use virtual machine for compiling rom from sources?
assassin0408 said:
I want to learn and build custom rom using ubuntu 13.04 but i dont want to install ubuntu in my laptop. can i use virtual machine ( VirtualBox or VMware) to set up build environment and compile the rom? My Laptop Specs is intel core i5-2430m with 6gb ddr3 ram.. is these specs suitable to use virtual machine for compiling rom from sources?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes you can with these specs. Make sure to have a good connection because you will have to download approx 30gb of packages
Sent from my GT-I9070 using Tapatalk 4 Beta
done set up building environement and now sync repo of aokp.. after done compiling sources can i virtually run the rom before install in my phone?
Fix camera?
https://forum.xda-developers.com/chef-central/android/guide-porting-64bit-mtk-roms-mt6735-t3563807
I think that wont work, because our kernel or rom base is on 32bits o something like that, but i'm not sure, @vampirefo can confirm this if he want to
I believe these files listed are already ported into the build.
I had my doubts that this would make any change for our device, but i put the files into a patch install and tried it.
still No camera ..! sorry .
unless the files also needed to have permissions applied.
New rom compatible with Blu R1HD?
https://forum.xda-developers.com/android/development/nougat-unofficial-t3567653
menphis said:
New rom compatible with Blu R1HD?
https://forum.xda-developers.com/android/development/nougat-unofficial-t3567653
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not directly, would need to be "ported" and tweaked. That post says its for same processor and is tagged as "Coolpad 3"
Be careful testing with it. It comes from a general thread not any device specific thread so who know what to really is.
mrmazak said:
Not directly, would need to be "ported" and tweaked. That post says its for same processor and is tagged as "Coolpad 3"
Be careful testing with it. It comes from a general thread not any device specific thread so who know what to really is.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks friend.
Can the library work for R1HD camera in nougat?
menphis said:
Thanks friend.
Can the library work for R1HD camera in nougat?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do not know. It would have to be tested.
If there was a way to know what camera module the r1-hd has and then compare it to the one for cool-pad 3 lite has.
Other than being able to do that it is left to trial and error.
Is already there and is not working I think is something with the boot img I mean the kernel part
Id really like to see the camera working. I dont mind my R1s camera not working really because i dont use it, But if it were working the Rom would receive unofficial build status instead of the "beta" and "discontinued" its been getting.
I have Nougat on my R1 solely thanks to Mrmazak
10033859 said:
Id really like to see the camera working. I dont mind my R1s camera not working really because i dont use it, But if it were working the Rom would receive unofficial build status instead of the "beta" and "discontinued" its been getting.
I have Nougat on my R1 solely thanks to Mrmazak
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, unless you switch phones or Blu releases an update camera won't be fixed.
To be honest camera isn't very good in any built rom for Blu devices, I have several roms I built for Blu Life Max, camera works but it isn't very good, pink haze on back camera, front camera is ok, still not as good as stock rom, or ported stock rom from another device.
Sent from my NXA8QC116 using Tapatalk
---------- Post added at 08:45 PM ---------- Previous post was at 08:41 PM ----------
menphis said:
Fix camera?
https://forum.xda-developers.com/chef-central/android/guide-porting-64bit-mtk-roms-mt6735-t3563807
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
64bit won't work on 32bit, nor will 32bit work on 64bit, no way around that.
A 32bit kernel can only use 32bit binaries, 64bit kernel can only use 64bit binaries.
Sent from my NXA8QC116 using Tapatalk
vampirefo said:
Well, unless you switch phones or Blu releases an update camera won't be fixed.
To be honest camera isn't very good in any built rom for Blu devices, I have several roms I built for Blu Life Max, camera works but it isn't very good, pink haze on back camera, front camera is ok, still not as good as stock rom, or ported stock rom from another device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah you got a point. The camera was never very good on Cyanogen or Lineage. Or even for that matter on the BLU rom itself... When i need the camera i just use my other S6 Active.
vampirefo said:
A 32bit kernel can only use 32bit binaries, 64bit kernel can only use 64bit binaries.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The compat layer (see CONFIG_COMPAT) in the kernel allows for 32 or 64-bit userland with 64-bit kernel and is supported by Android. The tinno 64-bit config has this enabled.
mumbel said:
The compat layer (see CONFIG_COMPAT) in the kernel allows for 32 or 64-bit userland with 64-bit kernel and is supported by Android. The tinno 64-bit config has this enabled.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that means nothing, no matter.
good luck compiling a 64bit kernel out of 32bit source.
perhaps R1HD Plus, kernel source might be of some use to you all, the phone is advertised as 64bit, I think it's really going to be 32bit, but won't know til someone gets one.
vampirefo said:
that means nothing, no matter.
good luck compiling a 64bit kernel out of 32bit source.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You didn't know you could run 32-bit binaries in a 64-bit kernel, and now you're saying you can't compile 64-bit kernels out of 32-bit source, whatever you think you mean by that. The point of me mentioning the tinno config is there is a 32-bit config and 64-bit config for the same soc and surprise, it uses the same source. There is minor difference in the config choosing arch/arm and arch/arm64, but it still compiles and the source is there to do it.
mumbel said:
You didn't know you could run 32-bit binaries in a 64-bit kernel, and now you're saying you can't compile 64-bit kernels out of 32-bit source, whatever you think you mean by that. The point of me mentioning the tinno config is there is a 32-bit config and 64-bit config for the same soc and surprise, it uses the same source. There is minor difference in the config choosing arch/arm and arch/arm64, but it still compiles and the source is there to do it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can't help you learn the difference, you will get there on your own.
A 64bit kernel can't run 32bit binaries, nor can a 32bit kernel run 64bit binaries.
You are confusing Linux kernel with Android kernel.
Android kernel 64bit uses a 64bit toolchain Android kernel 32bit uses a 32 bit toolchain neither kernel could possibly run any binaries compiled with the other toolchain.
But, instead of me trying to teach you the difference, go ahead and fix the camera with the 64bit binaries, no better teacher than hands on, get your hands dirty.
Sent from my LIFE X8 using Tapatalk
did anybody seen this thead https://forum.xda-developers.com/k3-note/orig-development/rom-custom-nougat-roms-k-3-note-t3513466
liviu_anc said:
did anybody seen this thead https://forum.xda-developers.com/k3-note/orig-development/rom-custom-nougat-roms-k-3-note-t3513466
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's written there is 100% correct, that's why camera will never ever work, unless Blu releases an update.
That's the main reason I got rid of the phone, other phones don't have the same limitations that R1HD has.
My Life Max doesn't have the problem, hopefully the new R1HD plus doesn't either.
Sent from my Life_Max using Tapatalk
vampirefo said:
What's written there is 100% correct, that's why camera will never ever work, unless Blu releases an update.
That's the main reason I got rid of the phone, other phones don't have the same limitations that R1HD has.
My Life Max doesn't have the problem, hopefully the new R1HD plus doesn't either.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I hope to the new r1 hd it doesn't have this kind of problems is having a different processor anyway I read something like the new r1 hd plus has a 64 bit processor
liviu_anc said:
I hope to the new r1 hd it doesn't have this kind of problems is having a different processor anyway I read something like the new r1 hd plus has a 64 bit processor
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think that was just another lie Blu told, I am betting it's 32 bit.
If 32 bit and camera doesn't use junk libaries like R1HD, the phone can run many custom roms.
Most likely run same roms my Life Max can.
Should know soon enough a lot of people ordered the phone.
Whether is 64 bit or 32 bit.
Sent from my Life_Max using Tapatalk
vampirefo said:
I think that was just another lie Blu told, I am betting it's 32 bit.
If 32 bit and camera doesn't use junk libaries like R1HD, the phone can run many custom roms.
Most likely run same roms my Life Max can.
Should know soon enough a lot of people ordered the phone.
Whether is 64 bit or 32 bit.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When I will get to us I will order straight that phone who knows probably is having a 64 I didn't seen one in real life so I don't know yet just let's hope is a 64
like they say here https://www.mediatek.com/products/smartphones/mt6737