the forbidden kernal - Galaxy Note GT-N7000 Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

i know what is the forbidden kernal is called t*** kernal i know
but my question is why is it forbidden ???

due to non compliance to gpl
no code release

android is/should be open source, which means letting people know exact code is in there, re-used or not.
Like N said above.
Because not gpl, you dont know what's in there plus proper acknowledgement s not given where it is due, etc.
That is why this thread will be locked soon.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2

I dont know what is the name... can i know wht it is?

No
Sent from my Amazon Kindle Fire using Tapatalk 2

noteandfound said:
I dont know what is the name... can i know wht it is?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wikipedia
In Norse mythology, t*** . is a hammer-wielding god associated with thunder, lightning, storms, oak trees, strength, the protection of mankind, and also hallowing, healing and fertility
imdb
t*** (2011)
The powerful but arrogant warrior T*** is cast out of the fantastic realm of Asgard and sent to live amongst humans on Earth, where he soon becomes one of their finest defenders.

If you guys keep hinting at the name you are violating xda terms of service.

This Kernel is not worth the effort anyway... its really unstable for me.

asf58967 said:
If you guys keep hinting at the name you are violating xda terms of service.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't think this thread is in violation of xda . the op simply wanted to know why the kernel is banned here ..that's all . he didn't want to download it nor asked for any links . sharing links maybe a violation . but a simple name and explanation not so
at least that's how I have interpreted it .
if not here where is he supposed to ask such a simple question ? yahoo answers ????

itsrijo said:
I don't think this thread is in violation of xda . the op simply wanted to know why the kernel is banned here ..that's all . he didn't want to download it nor asked for any links . sharing links maybe a violation . but a simple name and explanation not so
at least that's how I have interpreted it .
if not here where is he supposed to ask such a simple question ? yahoo answers ????
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Although I know what you mean, any mention of non gpl compliant code is forbidden. I think this should be flagged to the mods. Any questions, it's best to pm someone who knows, it doesn't need to be public.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium

OP did you get your answer...any more infomation needed PM can be sent to me.
Thread Closed & Thank You

Related

{ROM}[Pure Gingerbread]OMGB 1.2.1{2.3.5}

OMGB = Pure Gingerbread AOSP. Minimal deviations from stock.
Current version 1.2.1 as of July 27
Check the thanks page for a full list of contributions.
This is for all you guys out there who want their phone slim, sleek, and fast.
2.3.5 Based.
Fast
Minimal deviations from stock
Three in one reboot mod
Extra Rom info in About Phone
Screen On/Off enabled by default
Ubuntu font
T3hh4xx0r Wallpapers
TMO Theme Changer
FM Radio
Stripped down God Mode for easy addons and nightlies downloads
Known Bugs
None?
Changelog found in rom under About OMGB
Downloads
Screenshots**
Thanks
Source
Twitter
IRC
#r2gb on Freenode or use our Webchat​Donate
*Also on Rom Manager under t3hh4xx0r
**Screenshots are from a personal setup and my not exactly reflect the rom
Coming up tonight. Huge thanks to Framework43 for getting this going for us, if youd like, you can donate to him here.
This is getting installed as soon as I get home tonight =D
Sent from my DROIDX using XDA App
i may be missing something here but where is the droid x version? this is posted under droid x but under the downloads there is no dx option,
runandhide05 said:
i may be missing something here but where is the droid x version? this is posted under droid x but under the downloads there is no dx option,
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's in the shadow folder, however there isn't a download yet.
The 'codename' for the Droid X is Cdma_Shadow.
Sent from my DROIDX using XDA App
infazzdar said:
It's in the shadow folder, however there isn't a download yet.
The 'codename' for the Droid X is Cdma_Shadow.
Sent from my DROIDX using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I knew the dx was aka shadow but there was nothing in the folder. That's why I was asking if I was missing something. Thanks buddy. Guess il just check back now and again to see when it goes up
Sent from my DROIDX using XDA Premium App
Yes this needs to be taken down if it isnt for Droid X, if it is, you should have a direct download link. Not a link to another site for downloads.
I think that's in the rules of the forums.
Relax Forum Police
shukero said:
Yes this needs to be taken down if it isnt for Droid X, if it is, you should have a direct download link. Not a link to another site for downloads.
I think that's in the rules of the forums.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He says in the next message it is coming up tonight. Man some peoples self worth. You might have to wait more than 3 seconds to get the latest out there.
"Coming up tonight. Huge thanks to Framework43 for getting this going for us, if youd like, you can donate to him here."
shukero said:
Yes this needs to be taken down if it isnt for Droid X, if it is, you should have a direct download link. Not a link to another site for downloads.
I think that's in the rules of the forums.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
a folder on a server isnt another site. you wanna handle 38 threads for me? update each one with a direct link every night?
jesus christ. everytime i get on this site i hate it more and more. never hear this kind crap on rootz
r2DoesInc said:
a folder on a server isnt another site. you wanna handle 38 threads for me? update each one with a direct link every night?
jesus christ. everytime i get on this site i hate it more and more. never hear this kind crap on rootz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ummm maybe because rootz doesn't have guidelines for posting... as for what you and the other guy said: I may have messed up the rule, but if you plan to bring something out, wait till it's actually out before you write a post saying " here it is" in the main post then under it saying "coming soon" that's misleading and hence why you get angry messages... Its like saying there is a ps3 here for free! Then saying well maybe tonight it'll be free. Of course you'll get backlash that's just common sense. Might I suggest that if you want to do this in the future put "coming soon" in the post title.
Now on to your direct download question. You should know by now that there are direct downloading (hosting sites) that allow you to have a list of several different files under 1 direct downloading page. IE 1 link then click on the file you want then instant download. No need for ftps or other miscellaneous things. And now for the several posts you have: that's what a developed does if they want to get stuff out to the masses. I've done much MUCH more than 27 threads in separate forums for much more popular things than android. Like for instance back in the old days when you had to El patches that were 150mb for counter-strike 7.5 beta.... aaahhh good old days.....
Sent from my DROIDX using XDA App
Builds up, I tweeted the md5
Sent from my SCH-I510 using XDA Premium App
r2DoesInc said:
Builds up, I tweeted the md5
Sent from my SCH-I510 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And it's down again.
r2DoesInc said:
a folder on a server isnt another site. you wanna handle 38 threads for me? update each one with a direct link every night?
jesus christ. everytime i get on this site i hate it more and more. never hear this kind crap on rootz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was not being ride for christ sake! I simply asked if I was missing something. A second post saying coming implies something else is coming, not the rom that u said was here. If u doing like people asking where a rom that u said was here is, then don't post that its here. That seems pretty simple.
Sent from my DROIDX using XDA Premium App
shukero said:
Ummm maybe because rootz doesn't have guidelines for posting... as for what you and the other guy said: I may have messed up the rule, but if you plan to bring something out, wait till it's actually out before you write a post saying " here it is" in the main post then under it saying "coming soon" that's misleading and hence why you get angry messages... Its like saying there is a ps3 here for free! Then saying well maybe tonight it'll be free. Of course you'll get backlash that's just common sense. Might I suggest that if you want to do this in the future put "coming soon" in the post title.
Now on to your direct download question. You should know by now that there are direct downloading (hosting sites) that allow you to have a list of several different files under 1 direct downloading page. IE 1 link then click on the file you want then instant download. No need for ftps or other miscellaneous things. And now for the several posts you have: that's what a developed does if they want to get stuff out to the masses. I've done much MUCH more than 27 threads in separate forums for much more popular things than android. Like for instance back in the old days when you had to El patches that were 150mb for counter-strike 7.5 beta.... aaahhh good old days.....
Sent from my DROIDX using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
How many phone sections are created before they're actually out or become useful?
Is it so hard the way he set it up? Last I heard he/they hadn't got a donation in a long ass time so how or why would one go through the hassle to change it...it's free work you're using!
Sent from my rooted cell phone using XDA Premium App
cricketsmoke said:
How many phone sections are created before they're actually out or become useful?
Is it so hard the way he set it up? Last I heard he/they hadn't got a donation in a long ass time so how or why would one go through the hassle to change it...it's free work you're using!
Sent from my rooted cell phone using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know its free work, I'm not complaining about the work (mostly because there is no work done yet, and I haven't tried it out), All I'm saying is that there are rules and I thought that one of them was no 3rd party dl link; meaning no one can say "here's the download" then take someone to a 3rd party site so that you have to click on additional links for the download. That's both misleading & under-minded.
Same thing I was complaining about with his "here is a new rom" then right under it there was an additional post stating "well.... coming soonish...." If you don't mislead people you won't get 1/2 as many angry posters as there normally are when this kind of crap happens. Read rules & don't mislead people, that's all Im saying.
shukero said:
I know its free work, I'm not complaining about the work (mostly because there is no work done yet, and I haven't tried it out), All I'm saying is that there are rules and I thought that one of them was no 3rd party dl link; meaning no one can say "here's the download" then take someone to a 3rd party site so that you have to click on additional links for the download. That's both misleading & under-minded.
Same thing I was complaining about with his "here is a new rom" then right under it there was an additional post stating "well.... coming soonish...." If you don't mislead people you won't get 1/2 as many angry posters as there normally are when this kind of crap happens. Read rules & don't mislead people, that's all Im saying.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Linking to downloads that REQUIRE REGISTRATION is against the rules. Direct downloads (or nearly direct, in this case) are not.
XDA doesn't host large files like roms. How would any dev post anything without an external site?? How, exactly, do you classify MediaFire, et al.?
If you have a question about said rules or think someone is breaking them, how about PMing someone who knows them (read: moderator) before pissing off a major developer.
r2, I'll implore you to stick around. Please, PM me if you need anything. I also mod in TB if you run into this kind of junk over there.
mrkite38 said:
Linking to downloads that REQUIRE REGISTRATION is against the rules. Direct downloads (or nearly direct, in this case) are not.
XDA doesn't host large files like roms. How would any dev post anything without an external site?? How, exactly, do you classify MediaFire, et al.?
If you have a question about said rules or think someone is breaking them, how about PMing someone who knows them (read: moderator) before pissing off a major developer.
r2, I'll implore you to stick around. Please, PM me if you need anything. I also mod in TB if you run into this kind of junk over there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thank you, but its been building for a while. there were 5 pages on rootz before i got a build up, 5 pages of discussion and friendly FAQ. even after the builds got messed up, not a single person got rude.
it hasnt just been here, though the guys here are what finally pushed me over the line. ive been dealing with this quite a lot here, and have been slowing down my post rate for a while. Maybe if xda can clean it act up ill be back, but i dont see it happening in the forseeable future.
all my work is still available, i just wont be posting it here.
mrkite38 said:
Linking to downloads that REQUIRE REGISTRATION is against the rules. Direct downloads (or nearly direct, in this case) are not.
XDA doesn't host large files like roms. How would any dev post anything without an external site?? How, exactly, do you classify MediaFire, et al.?
If you have a question about said rules or think someone is breaking them, how about PMing someone who knows them (read: moderator) before pissing off a major developer.
r2, I'll implore you to stick around. Please, PM me if you need anything. I also mod in TB if you run into this kind of junk over there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for jumping in quickly and appropriately!
R2, I don't use my X much,but I may have to check this out. Thanks for all the work you put in. Actually, I just flashed the MR2.5 radio on my Bolt, and plan to check out your work there as well. Keep on devvin!
mrkite38 said:
Linking to downloads that REQUIRE REGISTRATION is against the rules. Direct downloads (or nearly direct, in this case) are not.
XDA doesn't host large files like roms. How would any dev post anything without an external site?? How, exactly, do you classify MediaFire, et al.?
If you have a question about said rules or think someone is breaking them, how about PMing someone who knows them (read: moderator) before pissing off a major developer.
r2, I'll implore you to stick around. Please, PM me if you need anything. I also mod in TB if you run into this kind of junk over there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the clearification; but I wasn't referring to "3rd party websites" as sites like megaupload, megashare, etc, etc. I should of phrased it differently, what I should have used was "personal websites" because most of them usually require some kind of login. In this case no; so thanks again for clarifying.
As for pissing off the dev, that's a 2 edged sword, as I get why other people besides me are angry. It really is misleading to have a post in a section dedicated to ROM development/release and tell everyone "here it is" then post again saying coming soon. I don't really mind if it is coming soon, but it would have been nice to have him put something like "Coming soon" in the post title. Droid X doesn't have much development on XDA at all anymore. And since this is the second of 2 in the last month (and 1 rom before that in the last like 5) people are bound to freak out! Then to see something like what happened here, that will quickly turn into something like "wtf is this?"
We both had problems and now both problems are out in the open. We can both learn from it.
shukero said:
Thanks for the clearification; but I wasn't referring to "3rd party websites" as sites like megaupload, megashare, etc, etc. I should of phrased it differently, what I should have used was "personal websites" because most of them usually require some kind of login. In this case no; so thanks again for clarifying.
As for pissing off the dev, that's a 2 edged sword, as I get why other people besides me are angry. It really is misleading to have a post in a section dedicated to ROM development/release and tell everyone "here it is" then post again saying coming soon. I don't really mind if it is coming soon, but it would have been nice to have him put something like "Coming soon" in the post title. Droid X doesn't have much development on XDA at all anymore. And since this is the second of 2 in the last month (and 1 rom before that in the last like 5) people are bound to freak out! Then to see something like what happened here, that will quickly turn into something like "wtf is this?"
We both had problems and now both problems are out in the open. We can both learn from it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well now it has even less development on xda. Congratulations! You alienated another developer!
Sent from my SCH-I510 using XDA Premium App

Planning on Making an Android site

Hey guys,
Well I am planning on making a site for Android, and i need some help.
First thing I need help with finding a domain. For some reason most domains that I've tried are already taken.
So i need someone more creative than me.
The site will have news and reviews of android and android devices.
Thats all i've thought of right now.
The domain has to be a .com , and maybe have "android" somewhere in there .. ?
So help here
any help ?
maazali said:
Hey guys,
Well I am planning on making a site for Android, and i need some help.
First thing I need help with finding a domain. For some reason most domains that I've tried are already taken.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well. there is a reason for that ... and its that there is already a million stupid ass android review websites..
no offense intended ... but really ? why do you want to make this site? are you going to be footing the entire bill in terms of server space/ maintenance ?
While i do wish you luck in your endeavour.... Unless you have somthing really unique to offer , you website will become another speck on a already huge pile..
And you are already on one of the best resources for android reviews
just my thoughts on it ...
Good luck Yo!
I know, but it will hopefully offer something unique.
and remember this. When facebook started myspace had millions of members. If facebook founders had thought like you, then there would be no facebook. But hey facebook is now leading in social networking.
So XDA, I respect it a lot, and will always do, but if no one comes up with competition us (consumers, guests, viewers) won't get better content
Anyways, I am sure this wasn't the point of the thread here x.x
Gonzo__ said:
Well. there is a reason for that ... and its that there is already a million stupid ass android review websites..
no offense intended ... but really ? why do you want to make this site? are you going to be footing the entire bill in terms of server space/ maintenance ?
While i do wish you luck in your endeavour.... Unless you have somthing really unique to offer , you website will become another speck on a already huge pile..
And you are already on one of the best resources for android reviews
just my thoughts on it ...
Good luck Yo!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i quote ...
every morning U can read an "andorid news" ( the same ) on 123904723 sites
qballe said:
i quote ...
every morning U can read an "andorid news" ( the same ) on 123904723 sites
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am simply asking for suggestions on domain names.
An10101droid.com
Its not cool but getting topic on track.
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA Premium App
letsandroid.com
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA Premium App
ithinkandroid.com
androlife.com
colldroid.com
AndroidSupplyCo.com
iAndroid.com
SupremeAndroid.com
HTCxAndroid.com
Androidistheillest.com
Domain name ideas .

Bring back the darkynote thread!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Please unlock it
Dont silence Darky!!!! This is total crap!
They can take their lying and bad attitude and stay on their own site
Didn't even notice that, why was it locked/removed?
Swyped from my finger, to your face on my Samsung Galaxy Note, using Tapatalk!
RavenY2K3 said:
Didn't even notice that, why was it locked/removed?
Swyped from my finger, to your face on my Samsung Galaxy Note, using Tapatalk!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They had nothing to download in their thread, just a link to their own site. A violation of XDA rules. And in their own site Darky himself lied in a thread and called CheckRom an exact copy of DarkyRom. And when confronted with that they just deleted my useraccount, so they can lie but not take critics for it - so I think their childish behaviour can stay on their own site
I dont care about your beef. I just like their ROM, its the best period. You guys should squash that.
mkoger said:
I dont care about your beef. I just like their ROM, its the best period. You guys should squash that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you like their bugridden rom just go to their decitaded site for their Roms and download it there - not so hard
I do, every day. And, im waiting on the new 3.0 with ICS release. It would just be nice to get more users involved like before. (not bug ridden for me btw)
mkoger said:
Please unlock it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
IT WAS REMOVED?
I put it to xda atention that there whas no download in there thread. Xda is not a search engine ore start page. We want to see downloads and not ad threads.
Closed
If the thread violated XDA rules, then it is closed. Case closed.

can developer steal a rom from another developer?

just a subj... is it possible the some developer just take a rom which weas made by someone else and announce as his one achivement? (sulerly, some minor ganages could be done in the rom)
how to identify the thief?
alex_awful said:
just a subj... is it possible the some developer just take a rom which weas made by someone else and announce as his one achivement? (sulerly, some minor ganages could be done in the rom)
how to identify the thief?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not really stealing i guess as long as you put out credits of the people who created it, or by asking permission from the developers.
centrax said:
It's not really stealing i guess as long as you put out credits of the people who created it, or by asking permission from the developers.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if the "owner" has not been aware about any usage of his rom, is it faire to thread the rom? "credits" are given when a team were worked out the rom, or when you take the result of someone's job and just say "hey, i take it" ?
in my opinion, it is situational and depends on the context.
A =/= B =/= C
But they could share similarities that most people would agree something was done morally wrong. I guess you could share with us the situation then we can give a better opinion?
kaijura said:
I guess you could share with us the situation then we can give a better opinion?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i just wondering is there a sort of "widly known gentelmen agreement" about such situations. and the second matter is to get an idea how both parties (both developers) can get "a profitable solution" for both (= peace)
In my opinion, the developers community should be honest for it members. And other users have to proud for the achievments of this community. All team's results would be better, than results of each developer. That's why they should be together ^.^
PS sorry for bad english, I hope you understand my meaning
NikkyNine said:
That's why they should be together ^.^
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
all should be together with all ... sounds impossible
the problem is HOW can others results be used for making app / rom etc?
what is allowed to do and what is forbidden (ethically)?
alex_awful said:
all should be together with all ... sounds impossible
the problem is HOW can others results be used for making app / rom etc?
what is allowed to do and what is forbidden (ethically)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
To work together - allowed, to use with proper credits - allowed. To edit build.prop and post as own rom - not. I think so.
NikkyNine said:
To work together - allowed, to use with proper credits - allowed. To edit build.prop and post as own rom - not. I think so.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that is what i intended to clarify
alex_awful said:
just a subj... is it possible the some developer just take a rom which weas made by someone else and announce as his one achivement? (sulerly, some minor ganages could be done in the rom)
how to identify the thief?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you suspect something, you can always go and compare files.
Technically you can do whatever you want since android is open source.
Ethically it isbetter to consult with rom owners about using parts of a rom and credit them offcourse
Sent from my GT-P7100 using XDA Premium HD app
Psyloid said:
Ethically it isbetter to consult with rom owners about using parts of a rom and credit them offcourse
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if someone did not done it (consult) before he take a part of rom, what will happen? does it mean that othe other community will declare a boycott against him? or just say "you'd better stop doing it"?
Of course you're all talking about the Rom owners, Google... Right? Or perhaps HTC? I would be very surprised if any Rom posted in our dev thread have asked Linus Torvalds personally if they could post a derivation of his operating system here.
You don't see too many credits to those 3 either...
It's public domain, nobody here has built a Rom entirely from scratch all have borrowed from the community and the source, and if they offer even one piece of code that's new, I say good on them, they are contributing to the community, and the community will take from and build on that too.
But let's cut to the chase, why are you asking the question? You're planning to contribute? Or are you here to point the finger at someone for stealing your creation?
alex_awful said:
if someone did not done it (consult) before he take a part of rom, what will happen? does it mean that othe other community will declare a boycott against him? or just say "you'd better stop doing it"?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They come to your house and stab you in the back.
Lol !!!
Sent from my GT-P7100 using XDA Premium HD appu
alex_awful said:
if someone did not done it (consult) before he take a part of rom, what will happen? does it mean that othe other community will declare a boycott against him? or just say "you'd better stop doing it"?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Like everyone has stated, being a open source code and that no one in here is making profit from the roms, (on this site at least i can not speak for the world) it is really a null point of theft everything is free you can not steal something that is owned by the public. As well if you plan on taking something from a rom I would strongly suggest that you ask, and give proper credit were it is due. personally if i worked on a project and someone was using my development with no permission or credit i would publicly humiliate them in anyway possible so that the ass who "stole"
my work would never be able to call it his own again. As well the XDA community is great group of people who if you steal anything from another rom with no permission will find out and ostracize you for your pathetic attempt to pass of someone else's blood sweat and tears as your own.
Nuff said lol

Cataclysm

Folks - I've read great things about the Cataclyst ROM but found the official thread on it had been closed by an XDA moderator. If I install it and run into issues, would there be some people supporting it and what thread?
Thx
sam008 said:
Folks - I've read great things about the Cataclyst ROM but found the official thread on it had been closed by an XDA moderator. If I install it and run into issues, would there be some people supporting it and what thread?
Thx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. Hence the closed thread. The dev left XDA.
ouch so i guess no further versions of his rom then?
sam008 said:
ouch so i guess no further versions of his rom then?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't want to sound like a douche... But re-read my last post.
*IF* he's releasing still, it's not on XDA and directing people via post to anywhere off-site is at least frowned upon (if not prohibited).
Yoinx said:
*IF* he's releasing still, it's not on XDA and directing people via post to anywhere off-site is at least frowned upon (if not prohibited).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe we should let @atl4ntis know that we love to see him back in whatever XDA thread or XDA (sub)forum. Not only for his work, but also because he is a helpfull and nice person.
Possibly his XDA account is still active.
We could mention him in our posts so he knows we do not forget. At this moment we have to respect his decision because he is hurt.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
NLBeev said:
Maybe we should let @atl4ntis know that we love to see him back in whatever XDA thread or XDA (sub)forum. Not only for his work, but also because he is a helpfull and nice person.
Possibly his XDA account is still active.
We could mention him in our posts so he knows we do not forget. At this moment we have to respect his decision because he is hurt.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The mention might work unless like most of the more senior members he has mention notifications turned off.
Can anybody please tell me what happened?
His rom is perfect as it's stock with just enough amount of customization.
Sad that he left.
jk0l said:
Can anybody please tell me what happened?
His rom is perfect as it's stock with just enough amount of customization.
Sad that he left.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As I understand it there was a dispute with another dev and that lead to a dispute about whether or not his rom was original work. XDA moved it to the non original section and he decided to abandon the project.
Sent from my Nexus 6 using XDA Labs
TonikJDK said:
As I understand it there was a dispute with another dev and that lead to a dispute about whether or not his rom was original work. XDA moved it to the non original section and he decided to abandon the project.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Here in the Netherlands @atl4ntis was popular. The Dutch press praised him for his 'cataclysm mod'.
The bulk of the problem was that he claimed his work was all original, yet refused to provide evidence to back his claims. Before anyone starts in on the "Apache license doesn't require sources" line, I know he was within his rights to refuse to show his sources. However, if you don't show sources, how can you reasonably expect anyone to believe your work is original?
The XDA staff made the right call here. If you refuse to prove your work is original, your work doesn't get to be located in the Original Android Development forum. In any event, this will be a moot point going forward as all new devices will only have one development section. That said, the mods and/or admin should be going through all device forums that have both an Android Development and Original Android Development subforum, and merging the two subforums into one.
sam008 said:
Folks - I've read great things about the Cataclyst ROM but found the official thread on it had been closed by an XDA moderator. If I install it and run into issues, would there be some people supporting it and what thread?
Thx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can go here; we'll be glad to help.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/android/general/info-cataclysm-mod-dead-t3307703
sam008 said:
... If I install it and run into issues, would there be some people supporting it and what thread...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
=http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=3307703

Categories

Resources