Database Develop

need some math help pls(urgent)

hey everyone i would be greatful to your'll if you could help me in math-geometry...this is slopes and lines
1:line through (-8,-2) and parallel to the line x = 5
2:Line through (-1,3) and parallel to the line 3x + 5y = 15
3:line through (8,0) and perpendicular to the line 3x + 4y = 12
pls give me the solution and the way of solving it
thanx

1st one is easy,...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Let me remember the rest.

djteotancolis said:
thanx for your help in math but i need to give a answer in number so what should i write?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK,... So the line they gave you was x=5. This is because x IS ALWAYS 5.
So on the line that I've put, the value for y is changing,... but ,... x IS ALWAYS ????
So,......

ddotpatel said:
OK,... So the line they gave you was x=5. This is because x IS ALWAYS 5.
So on the line that I've put, the value for y is changing,... but ,... x IS ALWAYS ????
So,......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats what given in the textbook

we need to find the solution and not the graph

Edit: Y = a(x-x0)+y0 as far as I remember
-------------------------------------
Sent via the XDA Tapatalk App

Im LEADING you to the answer!!!!!!
Answer what I just asked you!!!!!
x IS ALWAYS ???????
x= .........
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
x = -8

ddotpatel said:
Im LEADING you to the answer!!!!!!
Answer what I just asked you!!!!!
x IS ALWAYS ???????
x= .........
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
x = -8
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh ok thanx thats for the first one right?
sorry m just a bit tensed that i cant pay proper attention

2:Line through (-1,3) and parallel to the line 3x + 5y = 15
When x=0
3(0) + 5y = 15
5y=15
Y=3
So when x=0,.. y=3 ,...(0,3)
When y=0
3x + 5(0) = 15
3x=15
X=5
So when y=0,.. x=5,.. (5,0)
Plot both on graph, then join the two.

ddotpatel said:
2:Line through (-1,3) and parallel to the line 3x + 5y = 15
When x=0
3(0) + 5y = 15
5y=15
Y=3
So when x=0,.. y=3 ,...(0,3)
When y=0
3x + 5(0) = 15
3x=15
X=5
So when y=0,.. x=5,.. (5,0)
Plot both on graph, then join the two.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok but what solution should i write to the question? we arnt doin drawing of graphs just the writing works

In 2 and 3, first isolate y.
Then take the multiple of x, and use it as a in the function I wrote earlier. x0 and y0 are the coordinates you're given
-------------------------------------
Sent via the XDA Tapatalk App

Legend112 said:
In 2 and 3, first isolate y.
Then take the multiple of x, and use it as a in the function I wrote earlier. x0 and y0 are the coordinates you're given
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Isolate y,...
5y=15-3x
Y=3 - 3/5x
Is 3/5 the multiple of x to use?
y= 3/5(3/5 -...... WOAH this is getting confusing. Haven't done maths in 10 years!!!

I hate slope, always will. I'd help but, I hate it.

ddotpatel said:
Isolate y,...
5y=15-3x
Y=3 - 3/5x
Is 3/5 the multiple of x to use?
y= 3/5(3/5 -...... WOAH this is getting confusing. Haven't done maths in 10 years!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i know i'm sitting for two hrs now and these are the last two problems i'm stuck on i just dont get an answer....
thanx for your help and time

tapatalk can't qoute for some reason..
-------------------------------------
Sent via the XDA Tapatalk App

is 2:Line through (-1,3) and parallel to the line 3x + 5y = 15 the full question,... or is it asking for gradient and intersect???
Quick, i wana go sleep,... Its half 2 here!!!

ddotpatel said:
Isolate y,...
5y=15-3x
Y=3 - 3/5x
Is 3/5 the multiple of x to use?
y= 3/5(3/5 -...... WOAH this is getting confusing. Haven't done maths in 10 years!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes but -3/5
-------------------------------------
Sent via the XDA Tapatalk App

ddotpatel said:
is 2:Line through (-1,3) and parallel to the line 3x + 5y = 15 the full question,... or is it asking for gradient and intersect???
Quick, i wana go sleep,... Its half 2 here!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thats the whole question

Legend112 said:
Yeah the solution for 2 should be:
-3x/5+2.4
-------------------------------------
Sent via the XDA Tapatalk App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanx mate

Niiice,... I can leave you in Legend's capable hands then.
Gnyt!

[Q] Old timer needs help with algebraic equation

Guys, I've been approached by a young girl and she asked me to show her the answer to the root of 69 using only integers. My algebra computation unit (aka brain) is quite unused up to the point that A, L, G and E has completely rusted of the equation. I suppose the answer could be:
69 <3 i
but that is a little too cheeky. What do you think guys?

sakai4eva said:
Guys, I've been approached by a young girl and she asked me to show her the answer to the root of 69 using only integers. My algebra computation unit (aka brain) is quite unused up to the point that A, L, G and E has completely rusted of the equation. I suppose the answer could be:
69 <3 i
but that is a little too cheeky. What do you think guys?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
.... sqrt(69)....is "eight something" ("eight" is pronounced like "a.." errmm)
Here's the actual answer, though:
1. Find the closest perfect square -- 64, in this case. Subtract 64 from 69. The result is 5. Add two zeros after the result.
8.
√69
-64
-----
5|00
2. Double the number above the radical sign (exclude the period), and place the new number next to 500.
_8. _
√69
-64
-----
(16_) 5|00
3. Fill in the blank with a number, such that 16x times x is less than or equal to 500.
8.3
√69
-64
-----
(163) 5|00 (16x times x)
-489 <--163 times 3 = 489
-----
11|00
4. Repeat steps 2-3:
8.3_ √69
-64
-----
(163) 500
-489
-----
(166_) 11|00 <--double 83, and you get 166. remember, you exclude periods
__________________________________
8.30 √69
-64
-----
(163) 5|00
-489
-----
(1660) 11|00
- 0
------
1100|00
__________________________________
8.30_
√69
-64
-----
(163) 5|00
-489
-----
(1660) 11|00
- 0
------
(1660_) 1100|00
__________________________________
8.306
√69
-64
-----
(163) 5|00
-489
-----
(1660) 11|00
- 0
------
(16606) 1100|00
- 99636
----------
10364|00
__________________________________
8.306
√69
-64
-----
(163) 5|00
-489
-----
(1660) 11|00
- 0
------
(16606) 1100|00
- 99636
----------
(16612_) 10364|00
__________________________________
8.3066
√69
-64
-----
(163) 5|00
-489
-----
(1660) 11|00
- 0
------
(16606) 1100|00
- 99636
----------
(166126) 10364|00
- 996756
------------
39644
__________________________________
You can keep going, but the answer we have so far (8.3066) should be sufficient.
Using a calculator, we get: 8.3066238629180748525842627449075
*I learned this method from this site a while ago. ("Finding Square Roots Using an Algorithm)
EDIT: For some reason, when I submitted the post, the spacing I took a long time to create (to make the steps easier to follow) was erased. Now, everything's jumbled up. Sorry about that.

It's a joke post... GIS for 69 with safesearch off if you don't know what I mean...
and <3 is *heart*

sakai4eva said:
It's a joke post... GIS for 69 with safesearch off if you don't know what I mean...
and <3 is *heart*
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not stupid:
sumflipnol said:
.... sqrt(69)....is "eight something" ("eight" is pronounced like "ate" errmm)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I just wanted to do the actual computations...I suck at square roots, and my previous post is a good bookmark in the event that I need a refreshment of square root algorithms.

sumflipnol said:
I'm not stupid:
I just wanted to do the actual computations...I suck at square roots, and my previous post is a good bookmark in the event that I need a refreshment of square root algorithms.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ahahahaha...
I thought you fell into the trap... thanks for making my day with a serious answer to a stupid post.
And here's the fast way:
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=square+root+of+69

sakai4eva said:
ahahahaha...
I thought you fell into the trap... thanks for making my day with a serious answer to a stupid post.
And here's the fast way:
http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i=square+root+of+69
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Heheh. I suppose the grasshopper is learning the ways of the OT section.
Yeah, wolframalpha is my friend during my calculus classes. I even got the Android app for it.

sumflipnol said:
Heheh. I suppose the grasshopper is learning the ways of the OT section.
Yeah, wolframalpha is my friend during my calculus classes. I even got the Android app for it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
^Obligatory.
It's between me turning this place into a despicable image board and the llamas messing this place up

thx for the headaches

husam666 said:
thx for the headaches
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Obviously you need to widen your musical horizons... or at least club more

Old timer?

orb3000 said:
Old timer?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Refers to this posts for the reason why I wrote "old timer"
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=10668478&postcount=7

sakai4eva said:
^Obligatory.
It's between me turning this place into a despicable image board and the llamas messing this place up
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so we haz a new rival???

T.C.P said:
so we haz a new rival???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wahahahaha...
ahahaha...
ahah...
ha...
Ahem...
No. I wouldn't put llamas on the same level as I am, that they can be my "rivals" so to speak. You don't see the cook fighting with the cattle, do you?

orb3000 said:
Old timer?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

husam666 said:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ahahahaha....
GET OFF MY LAWN!
/hopefully not too obscure

Need help with this math problem.

So here's the problem.
Jones invested $18,000 in two accounts. One account pays 6% simple interest and the other pays 8% interest. Her total interest for the year was 1290. how much did she have in each account?
I know the answer because i looked for a solution and here it is.
6% account has x dollars 8% account has 18000-x dollars Interest = Principle * Rate * Time Interest from 6% account = x(0.06)(1) = 0.06x Interest from 8% account = (18000 -x)(0.08)(1) = 0.08(18000 - x) Total interest: 0.06x + 0.08(18000 - x) = 1290 0.06x + 1440 - 0.08x = 1290 -1440 -1440 -0.02x = -150 x = 7500 6% account has 7500 which earns 450 interest 8% account has 18000-7500 or 10500 dollars which earns 840 interest checks out to give a total of 1290 interest.
What i need to know is why was the 8% used to multiply on (18,000-x) instead of 6%?

I think the equation should read:
0.06x + 0.08y = $1290
Since the two variable represent different accounts. In this equation x would equal the amount in the account receiving 6% interest and y would equal the amount in the account receiving 8% interest. You substitute "18000 - x" because that is what y equals:
y= 18000 - x
So using substitution the equation would be:
0.06x - 0.08(18000 - x) = 1290
Now you only have 1 variable and it makes it much easier to solve the problem.

My real question is why was the 8% used to multiply with the 18,000 instead of the 6%?
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

You could have had it set up this way:
X=18000-y
You could have multiplied that by the 6%, but as you would work it out you'd have to get rid if the negatives at the end.
The equation would be:
.06(18000-y)-.08y=1290
Sent from 234 Elm Street

slow_DC4 said:
You could have had it set up this way:
X=18000-y
You could have multiplied that by the 6%, but as you would work it out you'd have to get rid if the negatives at the end.
The equation would be:
.06(18000-y)-.08y=1290
Sent from 234 Elm Street
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This would give me a different answer.

$7500 in the 6% account would earn you $450
$10500 in the 8% account would earn you $840
The question could read: what is the bank account that would give you 6% interest 1.6 yeah!

iynfynity said:
This would give me a different answer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, second equation should be
.06(18000-y)+.08y=1290
Sent from 234 Elm Street

OMG maths reached XDA , i'll kill myself , as i'm very stupid in maths
i can't even look at the numbers

If this is boring boring anyone. Try this.
If you have 1 $ which doubles (1 - 2 - 4 - 8 - 16) everyday, how long will it take to make you a billionaire.
Find out yourself and be surprised.
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA Premium App

4silvertooth said:
If this is boring boring anyone. Try this.
If you have 1 $ which doubles (1 - 2 - 4 - 8 - 16) everyday, how long will it take to make you a billionaire.
Find out yourself and be surprised.
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'll do this in java later.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App

iynfynity said:
I'll do this in java later.
Sent from my SGH-T959 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
While you are at it try this amazingly simple junior school equation and tell me the value of X
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

MikeChannon said:
While you are at it try this amazingly simple junior school equation and tell me the value of X
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
X=i?
Sent from 234 Elm Street

Get "alpham plus" and it will show the work for you!
Sent from my DROID2 using XDA App

4silvertooth said:
If this is boring boring anyone. Try this.
If you have 1 $ which doubles (1 - 2 - 4 - 8 - 16) everyday, how long will it take to make you a billionaire.
Find out yourself and be surprised.
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That depends on who you talk to, as some areas of the world consider 1000 millions to be 1 billion in which case it would be 31 finally equating to
1,073,741,824
But if you go for a million millions = 1 billion it would be 41 with a final of
1,099,511,627,776
I feel sick and my brain hurts.

MikeChannon said:
While you are at it try this amazingly simple junior school equation and tell me the value of X
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
-1?
sent from nowhere.

checkbox111 said:
That depends on who you talk to, as some areas of the world consider 1000 millions to be 1 billion in which case it would be 31 finally equating to
1,073,741,824
But if you go for a million millions = 1 billion it would be 41 with a final of
1,099,511,627,776
I feel sick and my brain hurts.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
31 is also my answer when it's 1,000,000,000. How do you show this in an equation? I solved mine in Java.

iynfynity said:
31 is also my answer when it's 1,000,000,000. How do you show this in an equation? I solved mine in Java.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Geometric Sequencing
S = (first term)*(1 - r^n)/(1-r)
In this case the first term is 1, the ratio, r, is 2 (the amount of
$'s doubles every day) and n (the number of terms) is 31.

checkbox111 said:
Geometric Sequencing
S = (first term)*(1 - r^n)/(1-r)
In this case the first term is 1, the ratio, r, is 2 (the amount of
$'s doubles every day) and n (the number of terms) is 31.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So now get a bussiness which doubles your money, and get rich fast.
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA Premium App

4silvertooth said:
So now get a bussiness which doubles your money, and get rich fast.
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes! but first learn to spell

checkbox111 said:
Yes! but first learn to spell
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just an extra s. U s. Just remove the ass (s) after you(u) to get it right.
Sent from my LG-P500 using XDA Premium App

.9999999999 = 1?

Someone explain that to me
Sent from my PG86100 using xda app-developers app

Well it will only equal one if you are rounding up to the nearest whole number! Other wise it obviously is itself.
sent from my dx2 w/paranoid android

Uhh, no? 0.999999 is 0.999999 not 1...
Sent from my premium potato

Go into the calculator, type in .9999999999 (ten 9's) and hit equals. My friend was telling me about how it equals 1, he learned it in pre-calc today or something
Sent from my PG86100 using xda app-developers app

Its close enough for government work

Yes, there's some skewed logic that makes .999 repeating equal 1. I'll have to look in my calc book and find it.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk 2

{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

beneath-a-burning-turtle said:
Go into the calculator, type in .9999999999 (ten 9's) and hit equals. My friend was telling me about how it equals 1, he learned it in pre-calc today or something
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
says "nope"

beneath-a-burning-turtle said:
Go into the calculator, type in .9999999999 (ten 9's) and hit equals. My friend was telling me about how it equals 1, he learned it in pre-calc today or something
Sent from my PG86100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Or better yet.
58008 = Boobs.
Somebody explain the math for that.

Here's the mathematical proof.
That's the version that makes the most sense to me but there's tons more here
---------- Post added at 03:59 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:57 PM ----------
063_XOBX said:
Or better yet.
58008 = Boobs.
Somebody explain the math for that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
0.1134

beneath-a-burning-turtle said:
Go into the calculator, type in .9999999999 (ten 9's) and hit equals. My friend was telling me about how it equals 1, he learned it in pre-calc today or something
Sent from my PG86100 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually its nine 9's

And here's another explanation.

m1l4droid said:
Guys, I'm happy for you, and Ima let you finish, but .9999...=1 is only approximate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you even read the two links I provided?

Is 0.9999999999 = 1?
No. The clue is in the question.
Mathematicians make assumptions, and this is a classic case of that. They're saying, "It's so close to 1 that we may as well call it that." I'd love to see the mathematician that agrees with the thread title working for NASA and calculating safety measures for rockets. (Actually I wouldn't because it would mean people would likely die!)

It's because your calculator wants to output numbers beginning with a whole integer. 0.999 instead of .999. So it cuts off the last digit and rounds with it. 9 is greater than 5 and so it rounds up. Then carries the addition over to make it 1.
Does that make sense without having to go into great detail? Once you get into advanced mathematics, you need to learn how all the different types of calculators are programmed to operate. Cause you learn you can't trust them because of problems like the one you are using. So you learn some don't follow order of operation, some round off the last digit, some cut it off.
It's why I always liked programming my formulas and theorems in cpp and getting the answers that way with the libraries that we made in my group.

Archer said:
Is 0.9999999999 = 1?
No. The clue is in the question.
Mathematicians make assumptions, and this is a classic case of that. They're saying, "It's so close to 1 that we may as well call it that." I'd love to see the mathematician that agrees with the thread title working for NASA and calculating safety measures for rockets. (Actually I wouldn't because it would mean people would likely die!)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. 0.999... or .9999 repeating is equal to 1.

veeman said:
No. 0.999... or .9999 repeating is equal to 1.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ummmmmmm..........................
No.jpg

707 + 707 = 1414

1>0.999999999, but the approximation is close.
It depends on what you're working on. If you were building a part for an aircraft and needed accuracy to be +/- .0001, it's the same. However, if I ordered to trade to $0.999999999 x 10^15 for $1.00 x 10^15, you'd be getting ripped off.

boborone said:
It's because your calculator wants to output numbers beginning with a whole integer. 0.999 instead of .999. So it cuts off the last digit and rounds with it. 9 is greater than 5 and so it rounds up. Then carries the addition over to make it 1.
Does that make sense without having to go into great detail? Once you get into advanced mathematics, you need to learn how all the different types of calculators are programmed to operate. Cause you learn you can't trust them because of problems like the one you are using. So you learn some don't follow order of operation, some round off the last digit, some cut it off.
It's why I always liked programming my formulas and theorems in cpp and getting the answers that way with the libraries that we made in my group.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
An easy test to figure out if your calculator rounds the last digit or cuts it off is to do 10÷6. Is the last digit a 6 or a 7. If it's 6, it cuts off, 7 it rounds off.

Divide by zero... brainstorm with zero and infinity calculations

What happens when you divide a number by 0? Since this is a dev forum, we know some maths what is your theory?
I especially love this one:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_fallacy#Division_by_zero
Funny facts about them: (legend a = any number (including ∞), f = finite number)
a * 0 = 0;
∞ / f = ∞;
1 / ∞ ~ 0;
∞ * a = ∞;
2 * a = a; (theory above)
Anything else, you post it

0 = nothing
when you divide something by nothing
you open up the time/space warp hole

Sorry just posted what you had done in the url. Look before you leap!
Any CPU will throw an interrupt/exception if you try it.

This happens.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}

Re: Divide by zero
stephj said:
From another thread we have:
x²-x² = x²-x²
On the left side: Take out x as a common factor.
x(x-x) = x²-x²
Treat the right side as the difference of two squares.
x(x-x) = (x+x)(x-x)
Cancel out the (x-x) on both sides of the equation.
x(x-x) = (x+x)(x-x)
x = (x+x)
x = 2x
1 = 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wtf!!!
Sent from my X8 using xda app-developers app

stephj said:
From another thread we have:
x²-x² = x²-x²
On the left side: Take out x as a common factor.
x(x-x) = x²-x²
Treat the right side as the difference of two squares.
x(x-x) = (x+x)(x-x)
Cancel out the (x-x) on both sides of the equation.
x(x-x) = (x+x)(x-x)
x = (x+x)
x = 2x
1 = 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ummm, that's flawed logic
x = 2x
0 = x
So x = 2x would be correct
0 = 2 * 0

R: Divide by zero
GT-I9100
Latest dori

Re: Divide by zero
I can't upload any photos:banghead:
Sent from my X8 using xda app-developers app

Re: Divide by zero
Gogeta said:
I can't upload any photos:banghead:
Sent from my X8 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use imgur mushroom.
To OP.

You'd have to ask Chuck Norris since he's the only one that can do it

When you divide by zero, you blend a blender inside of another blender.

Re: Divide by zero
*le enjoying popcorn*
+ my 2000th post:thumbup:
Sent from my X8 using xda app-developers app

Gogeta said:
*le enjoying popcorn*
Sent from my X8 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The reason I made this thread, found it on other forums, why not here too?

Re: Divide by zero
vlt96 said:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_fallacy#Division_by_zero
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wut! That's cool. Anyway division by zero equals to infinity since zero fits infinite times into whatever number you pick. For negative numbers it's negative (-)infinity.
Sent from my premium leather sofa

Re: Divide by zero
master5hake said:
You'd have to ask Chuck Norris since he's the only one that can do it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bruce Lee.

Ichigo said:
Bruce Lee.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The only person to have beaten Chuck Norris and lived to tell about it??
---------- Post added at 05:47 PM ---------- Previous post was at 05:39 PM ----------
ArmorD said:
Wut! That's cool. Anyway division by zero equals to infinity since zero fits infinite times into whatever number you pick. For negative numbers it's negative (-)infinity.
Sent from my premium leather sofa
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not really sure if division by zero equals infinity. I think the limit of a/b as b approaches zero is infinity. Thus a/0 cannot be defined.

Re: Divide by zero
Divide by zero is called "UNDEFINED"
Sorry for my bad English.
Sent from my Nexus 4.

Re: Divide by zero
Stop with the memes!

I'm in advanced math. My friend who is boss at math says dividing by 0 is like getting nothing, and nothing is the same thing as 0.

Re: Divide by zero
Then youd think youd have something to say ...lol
Sent from my SCH-I605 using xda app-developers app