Hello.
First of all, I know we have a Gaming thread, but I think that's about general gaming on Nexus 4, recommendations, and techniques.
This thread is about only Temple Run 2. This game has clocked 5M+ downloads in first week so I think we should have one.
post your high score: with screenshot
I'll try to keep the first post updated with the username and score + screenshot of the number one player.
Let's keep it fun and game. Eh? No cheat codes please.
When you get your high score in the hall of fame you instantaneously have the bragging rights to show to your friends.
@moderators: I was not sure if this should be in Themes & Apps, so I posted it here because IMO its not an app I'm introducing so it shouldn't go there. Feel free to move it of you will
No hax ^^
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my Paranoid Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Wow, that's phenomenol!
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Incredible High Score, i still got a distance of max 6k.
Do you have some tips for us
gets easy once u get lvl 9
As im still waiting on my N4 I havent played this on android yet so I can not submit a high score. However I have played both the first and second on iOS and while enjoying the first one, the second is horrible and lagging like no other game I have ever played on iOS. I'm hoping that on android it will run much smoother. To put into perspective, my high score on the first one was ~18 mil, in TR2 I think I may have been able to break 1mil only once.
zakazak said:
gets easy once u get lvl 9
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True but I'm still level 8.
You need 1 million total distance and 500k total coins before you can even get to level 9. And that takes ages
I'm sure there's lots of people out there with higher scores though. I saw 36 mil on some iphone screenshot.
tatltael said:
True but I'm still level 8.
You need 1 million total distance and 500k total coins before you can even get to level 9. And that takes ages
I'm sure there's lots of people out there with higher scores though. I saw 36 mil on some iphone screenshot.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
THIS!!! Also I want to unlock and root my phone and backup with carbon but im nervous
Sent from my Nexus 4 using XDA Premium HD app
I'm getting there.
Swagged out of my Paranoid NeXusâ´
My friend got 5 billion
myorks1127 said:
My friend got 5 billion
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
......
Not possible....
myorks1127 said:
My friend got 5 billion
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Proof or gtfo.
AW: Temple Run 2 HighScore thread
Just completely smashed my previous record, which was around 8 million. Got almost 14 million now. Still need to get to level 9 though. It takes ages...
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Still need to get to level 9 . I probably could easily get a higher score but saving my gems for future much higher high-scores!
Sent from my Blenzderz 9000
I believe the score should be supplemented by the number of retries you used (i.e., SAVE ME via the Green Gems). I'll start. Here is my score with three retries/save-mes.
Here is my low score after 44 tries. Hmmmm....
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
anwedr said:
Here is my low score after 44 tries. Hmmmm....
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh, I meant, the SAVE me option. Lol. You cannot possibly afford 44 save mes cause it would have costed you 400 gems by then. Lol.
What's so special about level 9
Sent from my N4 ... @danntracey for android/football news!!
colobos said:
What's so special about level 9
Sent from my N4 ... @danntracey for android/football news!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+2 gem powerup.
Related
Quadrant reading on my SGS ..
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Can go higher ..
Yes, much higher and who uses quadrant any more?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
racerboy3801 said:
Yes, much higher and who uses quadrant any more?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol, I ran quadrant earlier for ****s and giggles. I forgot I have it installed, I just like the animations.
Sent from me.
No the max is over 9000...when you get there you can't even go outside women just throw themselves at you and you have to roll your massive junk around in a wheelbarrow
haloimplant said:
No the max is over 9000...when you get there you can't even go outside women just throw themselves at you and you have to roll your massive junk around in a wheelbarrow
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
LMFAO
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
Without the stagefright tweak you can go up to 1800 . Just need to run the test few times And hope for the best. Also you can go with the stagefright tweak to 2500
I just had to.
reminds me a bit on DPS posing in WoW,....
hamti007 said:
reminds me a bit on DPS posing in WoW,....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was a rogue, I just cared about crits^^
to be back on topic:
quadrant is not reliable
Tweaking is like DJing, more loops don't automatically make it a better song
theduckking said:
Tweaking is like DJing, more loops don't automatically make it a better song
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But lots of flange and delay does!
Besides this, what are the reliable ones?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Antutu and Neocore.
Sent from my GT-I9003 using XDA App
haloimplant said:
No the max is over 9000...when you get there you can't even go outside women just throw themselves at you and you have to roll your massive junk around in a wheelbarrow
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks... that made me laugh
greeny2010 said:
Besides this, what are the reliable ones?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Reliable ones? Benchmarks only test a specific workload.. You aren't testing how fast applications run, you are testing how fast the benchmark runs. There doesn't have to be a direct correlation
Auzy said:
Reliable ones? Benchmarks only test a specific workload.. You aren't testing how fast applications run, you are testing how fast the benchmark runs. There doesn't have to be a direct correlation
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If there had been no correlation then benchmarks wouldn't have been used at all, that's not accurate.
You can easily get over 3000 with an ext2 loopback ontop of ext4 plus an overclock. But that's beside the point.
What matters is how it feels and performs day to day, that's more personal opinion. Quadrant is virtually useless IMO.
If you want a "true" quadrant score for what the Galaxy S is capable of without cheating/overclocking, you're probably looking at between 1600-1800 depending on ROM and filesystem.
joegamal said:
If there had been no correlation then benchmarks wouldn't have been used at all, that's not accurate.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I never said there wasn't. But, benchmarks are useless unless you actually know what you are testing..
Case in point, you have 1 program that does lots of writing (barely any reading), and a benchmark program.
If you increase reading speed by 6%, but decrease writing speed by 5%, a benchmark which treats reading and writing equally will give you a better score. Unfortunately, your app will be slower though. Of course, an increase in both will lead to a faster score, but so can other circumstances.
Most benchmarks aren't useless to everyone. Only to MOST users. Developers on the other hand who understand the benchmark and what they are optimising for, maybe would find them more useful..
In-game benchmarks although are useful out of the box, because they test performance of a specific workload/benchmarks. Every time someone optimises their phone to run a generic benchmark though, a kitten dies.
Did anyone hear about this? Apparently the iPhone 5 beat the nexus 7 and gs3 in benchmarks
These were the scores
IPhone : 1601
Nexus 7 : 1591
Samsung galaxy s3 : 1560
I don't put much emphasis on benchmarks because I know the scores really don't tell u anything compared to actually using the phone for performance. However, I do think the only reason why iPhone won here is because the OS doesn't do very much multitasking so it may be a bit faster in that regard
Any thoughts?
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
Benchmarks aren't meant to be compared between different OS's. The iPhone has a lower screen resolution, an OS that works completely different than Android and FSM knows what else Apple did with it's internals.
http://www.androidauthority.com/iph...ch-benchmark-certain-conditions-apply-115393/
That's the link to the story
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
http://browser.primatelabs.com/android-benchmarks
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
I knew that benchmark scores were nothing, but wat do u think of this nonsense?
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
MRsf27 said:
I knew that benchmark scores were nothing, but wat do u think of this nonsense?
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think Apple fanboys are having a field day with the report of higher benchmark scores. I would love to see what the gs3 pulls with Jellybean running on it.
Sent from my SGH-I997 using Tapatalk 2
so, whats ur point?
i dont think benchmarks do any differences.. I THINK.
MRsf27 said:
I knew that benchmark scores were nothing, but wat do u think of this nonsense?
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're not listening. Results between devices with different screen resolutions aren't comparable. The iPhone has 294400 less pixels in it's screen, so it uses less processing power to display images for the test. Ergo the tests aren't comparable.
As you said yourself in the OP, benchmarks don't mean anything at all, to be honest.
The only true way of noticing the difference between devices is to own the devices and using them. No benchmark ever can create a score based on pure usability.
I'm a product of the system I was born to destroy!
The S3 score is wrong. S3 scored 1751 (i posted the link in my previous post).
LordManhattan said:
The S3 score is wrong. S3 scored 1751 (i posted the link in my previous post).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah apparently that benchmark score is with jellybean already running on the S3. Says so in the link that i provided as well.
"063_XOBX" look man, I really don't care about the benchmark scores; I just want to know what people think of this ludicrous article. I was reading the comments and its absurd. Some people really do care about these numbers. IMO, all this article and apple have in common is the number. the price for the iPhone 5 lol
Yeah, but then if you OC that iPhone 5, install a custom iOS build, tweaks, etc.... oh, ****. That's Android. My bad.
Ooooh right so comparing benchmarks of two devices using different os platforms. This is sick they should just take iPhone off benchmarking ,it's os uses less resources and it still has a small screen, soo WTF are they saying
Sent from my HTC Desire Z using xda premium
063_XOBX said:
Benchmarks aren't meant to be compared between different OS's. The iPhone has a lower screen resolution, an OS that works completely different than Android and FSM knows what else Apple did with it's internals.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup GS3 has 720p while iPhone has (560 something) so yea
Sent from my SGH-T959 using xda premium
There's a LOT of iPhone5/iOS6 threads about. We don't need another one, especially one that was started because of a fanboy article. So, I shall be closing this thread.
Besides, I have bacon soap. Your argument is invalid.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Hey fellow Nexus 4 owners, I heard a lot of rumors that the "Nexus 4 uses left-over parts" from the Optimus G. To that end, I want to find out the general quality of our CPUs.
Basically, when Qualcomm makes the APQ8064 chip that you see in our Nexus 4, there are 4 different "types" based on how it meets their quality standards. These are Slow, Nominal, Fast, and Faster. The main difference IIRC between these types is how stable each can handle undervolting. CPUs that are "Fast" for example come pre-configured at a lower nominal voltage than a "Nominal" type CPU, and more so than a "Slow" type. (Does this account for how some people's phones generate less heat? Maybe, maybe not. IIRC, there's like only a -100mV difference between Faster and Slow out of the box, however Faster CPUs should be able to handle lower voltages than Slow-type.)
To find out what binned CPU you have, I recommend the following:
YOU MUST BE ROOTED!
1) Install Terminal Emulator
2) Reboot your phone
3) Open Terminal Emulator, and type:
Code:
su
dmesg | grep PVS
A line should be outputted that tells you what type you have.
For example, mine is NOMINAL. http://i.imgur.com/MUXrs.png
Please post your results in the following poll! (This poll began on /r/Nexus4, so rather than recreating the poll using XDA's system, I'm hoping to just get more results from here.)
http://poll.pollcode.com/qars3c
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
I guess I got lucky, mine says "Fast"
timgt said:
I guess I got lucky, mine says "Fast"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
according to the poll, most people have fast..
faster would be "lucky" ^^
Yeah, the average so far seems to be "Fast." Please post in the poll whatever results you get! I would like to see a good sample size from this!
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
The CPU doesn't have anything to do with LG using leftover parts or not. It's Qualcomm that does the binning, not LG.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
red12355 said:
The CPU doesn't have anything to do with LG using leftover parts or not. It's Qualcomm that does the binning, not LG.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know.. read my post. I want to dispel that rumor.
Fast
Faster..
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda app-developers app
I got fast
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Fast
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
Yes *****es, I got faster variant.
View attachment 1571600
:d
shipped 15th december
Can you also post when you got your phone shipped? Maybe different shipping time means you got different model?
What does this actually mean?
Eric-1987 said:
What does this actually mean?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It means more people will cry and return their phone.
Nvm I'm retarded
Sent from my Nexus 4
ChongoDroid said:
Does this not work on PA? Not getting an output.. I'll try this on stock
Sent from my Nexus 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Reboot. I had the same problem, I was like oh I already have terminal emulator installed, I'll just type it. Still requires a reboot, then type it
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
Nexus 4 owners, (past and present), remember this thread? Well I don't know the range or any of that, I don't know what number means slow, nominal, fast, faster, fastest, so I'm not going to make a poll. Lets just began posting what we have so we can figure it all out.
If you didn't click the link I gave to the old thread:
1) You must be rooted
2) Type 'su' in terminal emulator.
3) Type 'dmesg | grep PVS
4 Post your findings!
Here's what I got:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Going into this thread I felt that I need more XP to level up in order to understand what you just asked everyone to do.
JK
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
PVS 3 here too
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
PVS 1 here
PVS 2, not so bad. It can handle 150mV UV.
PVS 3
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
PVS 1
Ran again and got PVS 4
Pvs 5. Returned in 0.457, if you guys want to bench lol
PVS 2 here
EDIT : 0.612 here. I have no luck in the silicon lottery my nexus 4 was nominal too
RussianBear said:
Pvs 5. Returned in 0.457, if you guys want to bench lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn thats got to be fastest. It must be a 1 to 5 scale; slow, nominal, fast, faster, fastest
BravoMotorola said:
Damn thats got to be fastest. It must be a 1 to 5 scale; slow, nominal, fast, faster, fastest
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wait for Franco's app to be updated for n5, then we'll know for sure.
level cleared!!
Soldier 2.0 said:
Going into this thread I felt that I need more XP to level up in order to understand what you just asked everyone to do.
JK
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
just to level you up
all CPU are nt the same, even if a very strenght process control there always be difference between two unit, the CPU are not matched pair
so there are some of them able to work on lower UV other no, some can handle overclocking better than other and so on
if you have a faster cpu PSV=4 you could have better perfomance in terms of overclocking or battery usage lowering voltage
for sure even in case of lower binning your N5 will fly...
stremax said:
just to level you up
all CPU are nt the same, even if a very strenght process control there always be difference between two unit, the CPU are not matched pair
so there are some of them able to work on lower UV other no, some can handle overclocking better than other and so on
if you have a faster cpu PSV=4 you could have better perfomance in terms of overclocking or battery usage lowering voltage
for sure even in case of lower binning your N5 will fly...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I'm pretty sure the difference isn't huge yet I think on the N4 the difference from 0-4 was big enough to cause concern. I had an N4 with a 0 (or 1 before 4.3) and its battery life wasn't as good as the one with a 3. I probably got on average 15-30 minutes more, and of course you can under volt a lot more on a better chip which can make a pretty big difference.
I couldn't get it to work... any suggestions? I am rooted.
http://i.imgur.com/JVMsKkA.png
Man, this sucks, I'm the slow kid. I got the PVS 2, returned .9xx. I checked it earlier, it's being a little strange though - sometimes the command works and logs all the information, sometimes it won't log anything at all. Hopefully when I check again later it'll give me a higher binning like the other guy. Probably not though. I did get fastest on my N4, so I guess you can't win them all.
UCLAKoolman said:
I couldn't get it to work... any suggestions? I am rooted.
http://i.imgur.com/JVMsKkA.png
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here. Exactly
PVS 4 here
Sent from my Nexus 5 using xda app-developers app
PVS:2
here
UCLAKoolman said:
I couldn't get it to work... any suggestions? I am rooted.
http://i.imgur.com/JVMsKkA.png
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that happened to me- i rebooted and all was good.
sent while running with scissors
UCLAKoolman said:
I couldn't get it to work... any suggestions? I am rooted.
http://i.imgur.com/JVMsKkA.png
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
crypticc said:
Same here. Exactly
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's being a bit finnicky. I rebooted and tried again, it's working again. Mine went from 0.9xx to 0.607 when I tried this time. Weird. Still PVS 2.
I bet there's a few people here who either know or suspect that they fall somewhere on the spectrum. Take the AQ Test and post your results:
http://aq.server8.org/
Here's mine:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I got 21
Sent from my Note 3 powered by Omega v12
Vocaloid fan? Check out this thread!
I'm average :/
Sent from my Nexus 7 using Tapatalk
24
Was a little higher than I thought it would be.
Yikes...scored a 23.
As the parent of an autistic child, I'd like to add that this test is bull**** and slightly offensive.
Excreted from my Nexus 5
[Guide] Headphone/Earphone Buying
jRi0T68 said:
As the parent of an autistic child, I'd like to add that this test is bull**** and slightly offensive.
Excreted from my Nexus 5
[Guide] Headphone/Earphone Buying
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
"Researchers at Cambridge University's Autism Research Centre developed this questionanaire to measure autistic traits in Adults".
http://www.autismresearchcentre.com/
"The mission of the ARC is to understand the biomedical causes of autism spectrum conditions, and develop new and validated methods for assessment and intervention. The ARC fosters collaboration between scientists in Cambridge University and outside, to accelerate this mission."
Seems to me the ARC are doing valuable and helpful work. If you have a problem with that take it up with them.
Proper autism diagnosis requires significantly more testing than an online questionnaire. My son spent countless hours with a neuropsychologist to get accurate answers. They may be doing valuable research, but this is not any form of a valid measure. Nothing aimed at you, Dirk. The offensive part is that whoever put that up online thinks a handful of questions answered by random people on the internet can tell them whether or not they fall somewhere on the spectrum. It demeans the struggle that is everyday life of someone with autism.
Edit:
It seems they acknowledge themselves that this is kinda bs.
" Our tests are posted on our website to enable free access to academic researchers. None of them are diagnostic: No single score on any of our tests or questionnaires indicates that an individual has an Autism Spectrum Condition (ASC). If you are concerned that you, or a friend or relative, may have ASC, please discuss these concerns with your GP or family doctor or ask the*National Autistic Society*(NAS) or equivalent charity in your country, for advice."
Excreted from my Nexus 5
[Guide] Headphone/Earphone Buying
I think we should not correlate the "autis" with addicted to games or smartphones
SeSachee said:
I think we should not correlate the "autis" with addicted to games or smartphones
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nobody here made that correlation...
What happens if you score a 50??!!!??
Gohan said:
Well, then you're Mark Manning.
Sent from my Nexus 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
REKT
"Most people with Asperger Syndrome or high functioning autism score about 35" Scored 35. Yay x)
I got 39 from one on wired. Com not surprising though since I've known I was an aspie for about 16 years. Can't tell by knowing me I remember a lot of conversations that I hear and from whom and repeat to others in social situations. I try to categorize in my head the social circle from which it came to use in other similar circles to be in context. Especially great for small talk and meating new people. I also try to watch reactions and facial expressions in movies do I can try to mimic in situations in similar context.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
24... :/
I got 22.
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
24 for me.
APeter001 said:
42, though I have scored 47 in a similar test before.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I used to score in the forties so I guess getting less aspie.. So in 2040 I should score normal.. Lol
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I747 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I scored 16, so I guess I'm normal then. Too bad lol
46.
No shock there, I've been diagnosed with Aspergers a number of times, as well as APD. *shrugs* People are boring, anyway.