Related
Hello everybody. I want to ask our developers, will we get Android 4.1? If not - why, if yes - when? Thanks for answers .
I m not a developer but i can say we can only get jb frm cm sources
Otherwise it is difficult to port aosp build
If sir maclaw and team successfully make working aosp ics for armv6 we can probabily get jb too
vishal007 said:
I m not a developer but i can say we can only get jb frm cm sources
Otherwise it is difficult to port aosp build
If sir maclaw and team successfully make working aosp ics for armv6 we can probabily get jb too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Best Regards
It is hard to get a stable ics as of now it is goin to take minimum 6 to 7 seven months before a bugfree ics and then only we can look forward to jb we muat have patience.
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda app-developers app
Well, when the sources are out, we'll see about that
Patience is a virtue moreover there isn't much difference in user looks
Just a few add ons here and there moreover I doubt about how will this device go on with jb.But anyways well see that expect stable jb for our device by early 2013.Many experimental build will start popping out soon
vishal007 said:
I m not a developer but i can say we can only get jb frm cm sources
Otherwise it is difficult to port aosp build
If sir maclaw and team successfully make working aosp ics for armv6 we can probabily get jb too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GOOD NEWS !
MACLAW SUCCESS MAKE AOSP WORKING FOR ARM V6 !!!!! :victory:
kagamineryuki said:
GOOD NEWS !
MACLAW SUCCESS MAKE AOSP WORKING FOR ARM V6 !!!!! :victory:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
congrats
but its only for gio till now may be ace too but maclaw didnt tell any news for mini/fit aosp
they r saying they dont hav device to work on :crying:
vishal007 said:
congrats
but its only for gio till now may be ace too but maclaw didnt tell any news for mini/fit aosp
they r saying they dont hav device to work on :crying:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
owww, that's why maclaw search for volunteer who have galaxy mini
btw thanks for information
sorry for my bad english
there won't be fully working ics/jb because no one willing to re-write damn codecs... y'all have fully working cm7, be happy with that, or buy yourself nexus s or one x, which have ics from the start. Peoples! Stop dreaming and expecting wonders from heavily outdated phone!
Maybe the devs will do something, if the rest of the people is willing to wait!
AOKP build with modified libstagefrighthw.so can play 720p @ ~10 (maybe more) fps, HQ youtube works ( as testers reported ). If AntiBillOS will give permissions camera will be working with 3rd party apps too. So... it's not so impossible after all.
Ok, so camera will work, but only ON HACKS. That's great, really. How about stability of os? :>
no ways thank god if you get ics for dialy use another cm10 project awaits macclaw
ajay8055 said:
no ways thank god if you get ics for dialy use another cm10 project awaits macclaw
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no, cm10 will be android 5.0... jellybean will be cm9.1 or something like that, since jellybean is just an update of ics...
yackovsky said:
no, cm10 will be android 5.0... jellybean will be cm9.1 or something like that, since jellybean is just an update of ics...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
might be if we get a stable ics we can get jelly bean to work..but we need something out of the ordinary
ajay8055 said:
no ways thank god if you get ics for dialy use another cm10 project awaits macclaw
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From latest Marcin comments, GalaxyICS will drop Mini / Fit support.
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda app-developers app
yackovsky said:
there won't be fully working ics/jb because no one willing to re-write damn codecs... y'all have fully working cm7, be happy with that, or buy yourself nexus s or one x, which have ics from the start. Peoples! Stop dreaming and expecting wonders from heavily outdated phone!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yup, i agree with u. The only issue with cm9 (for me at least) is the lack of RAM, i dont care abt the "crappy camera" or "useless" FM.
all devices haing cm9 or aosp ics can run jellybean
goutamniwas said:
all devices haing cm9 or aosp ics can run jellybean
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok, but the question is not if they can, because it's obvious that galaxy mini is able to run ics/jb, the question is: can it be runned smoothly on low end phone? and i'm only guessing that the answer is no, because of extremely low specs (compared to other phones nowaday) of galaxy mini
Hi guyz, please help me i searched everywhere but i cant find the latest CM9, it's nightly i think, can someone post me a link plz i am very desperate...
sorry for bad english,bla bla
MSGR said:
Hi guyz, please help me i searched everywhere but i cant find the latest CM9, it's nightly i think, can someone post me a link plz i am very desperate...
sorry for bad english,bla bla
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
CM9 Nightly is no more available for Mini. The download links/site has been taken down.
so there is no way to have the latest CM9? so sad
Wow... I still don't get it why you guys want to use buggy to extreme rom... well, if you really want to, there's cm10 far better than cm9, but still not perfect
Their brains are washed out with their custom ROM God, the Maclaw
MSGR said:
so there is no way to have the latest CM9? so sad
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Nope, but still there are few ROMs based on ICS in the development section.
just use this CM10. it is now almost perfect :good:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1793511
OK i will try CM10 i only want to test CM9 'cause i think there are a less bugs so thank you for give me an advice peace
Oh, You could test AOKP that build by TheWhisp also. It is now temporary stop since he focus on CM10.
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda app-developers app
Hi guys! I am quite excited about temasek's work, I reckon that everyone on i9300 do the same
So my question is if any talented dev/porter/kanger might port this great ROM to our i9305?
Hbohd said:
Hi guys! I am quite excited about temasek's work, I reckon that everyone on i9300 do the same
So my question is if any talented dev/porter/kanger might port this great ROM to our i9305?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Link?
Flockrock said:
Link?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Usual place .
http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1566
Flockrock said:
Link?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry, I forgot about that :/
Here is of course the link --> CLICK
To my mind, our device is lacking at least ONE cm kanger, it would be nicer if we had such person..
Hbohd said:
Sorry, I forgot about that :/
Here is of course the link --> CLICK
To my mind, our device is lacking at least ONE cm kanger, it would be nicer if we had such person..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I would love to have that famous temasek kernel in our i9305 plus cm rom.
santos.jeff said:
I would love to have that famous temasek kernel in our i9305 plus cm rom.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've tried porting his kernel many times, always same result - random reboots, freezes, phone stucks... Unfortunately I am not able to find out what's the cause of these problems, I thought I made everything well :/
I even tried yesterday, many, many different settings.. And I was disappointed again
Hy all.
I've been watching this board for quite a long time but in the end I decide to ask for advice from someone that knows.
I'm searching for ideal rom that has working device parts like tv-out. I kinda dount I'll find any 4.3 tom with this feature if not pease suggest me some other latest build. I tried sevral latest rom on CM base (CM 10.1, 10.2 Slim beam 4.2.2 4.3, C-rom v4) but with no luck, thus many of those are very buggy in basic operatios. Currently using updated Helly Bean 4.3.
Thanks
CM currently doesn't have DeviceParts working. And because a lot of 4.3 roms draw from CM sources, none of them will have that feature fully working.
Odd though, CM10.1 and Slim 4.2.2 should have it working
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk HD
Soryuu said:
CM currently doesn't have DeviceParts working. And because a lot of 4.3 roms draw from CM sources, none of them will have that feature fully working.
Odd though, CM10.1 and Slim 4.2.2 should have it working
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for respond Soryuu, I see your point but I was unable to make DeviceParts working on Cm 10.1 and slim 4.2.2. though I really like every rom I tried (might be cause I'm still new ith those ).
I'm lost...
But when i`m using CM 10.1.2 stable the deviceparts worked as well ... what was your prob???
elektroda said:
Thanks for respond Soryuu, I see your point but I was unable to make DeviceParts working on Cm 10.1 and slim 4.2.2. though I really like every rom I tried (might be cause I'm still new ith those ).
I'm lost...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
freakymod2120 said:
But when i`m using CM 10.1.2 stable the deviceparts worked as well ... what was your prob???
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
When I connect phone with tv with cable, I just can't enable tv.out setting under menu, it stays gray. Cable is fine, I've been using it with my very old rom (2.2) before and decide to refresh my rom, that is why I asked in the first place.
Am I missing something or?
Okay i think you should report it here ...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2039755&page=569
elektroda said:
When I connect phone with tv with cable, I just can't enable tv.out setting under menu, it stays gray. Cable is fine, I've been using it with my very old rom (2.2) before and decide to refresh my rom, that is why I asked in the first place.
Am I missing something or?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
freakymod2120 said:
Okay i think you should report it here ...
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2039755&page=569
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I probabl should, but I don't bave privilegies to post in dev section. Othervise I would share my experience and report qute few bugs with different roms which could help solving them.
elektroda said:
I probabl should, but I don't bave privilegies to post in dev section. Othervise I would share my experience and report qute few bugs with different roms which could help solving them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just keep posting and helping others in the Q and A section, you'll get to your ten posts in no time don't spam though, that doesn't go down well...
But once you do have ten posts, as freakymod said report this in the dev thread and see if someone knows what's going on.
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk HD
Ah okay sorry i haven`t that you have <10 postings ,sorry...
Maybe you can describe the bug or missing function and i post it in teh dev thread for you ...
elektroda said:
I probabl should, but I don't bave privilegies to post in dev section. Othervise I would share my experience and report qute few bugs with different roms which could help solving them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright, thank you both. I'll probably do that. Freaky I'll send you PM so that way we could rool things up a bit.
Cheers
Okay no prob i wait for the PM ...:good:
elektroda said:
Alright, thank you both. I'll probably do that. Freaky I'll send you PM so that way we could rool things up a bit.
Cheers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First of all, this is NOT a request to developers to leave everything and start making AOSP ROMs. I am just curious why we have almost none or at least not fully functioning AOSP ROMs. The ones I tried, SpaceCaker's AOSP GB and the 2 AOSP ROMs from Maclaw, were great. Don't get me wrong, I like the CyanogenMod ROMs, just curious why AOSP gets overlooked. Are they harder to build than other ROMs or are people really not into them? Appreciate any input.
Also, if anyone knows of any AOSP builds besides the three mentioned (SpaceCaker's AOSP Gingerbread, Maclaw's AOSP ICS and Jellybean), I would be grateful if you would share them. Cheers!
I agree with you...there aren't much aosp ROM for our Ace although there are the best ROM that works smoother...but on the other hand there has much less function compared to CMs ROM...so maybe people want CM more..
What do you want more? I mean we have one aosp for gb, ics and jb.
If a developer would make another aosp rom, it would be more or less the same rom.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app
blugonjic said:
First of all, this is NOT a request to developers to leave everything and start making AOSP ROMs. I am just curious why we have almost none or at least not fully functioning AOSP ROMs. The ones I tried, SpaceCaker's AOSP GB and the 2 AOSP ROMs from Maclaw, were great. Don't get me wrong, I like the CyanogenMod ROMs, just curious why AOSP gets overlooked. Are they harder to build than other ROMs or are people really not into them? Appreciate any input.
Also, if anyone knows of any AOSP builds besides the three mentioned (SpaceCaker's AOSP Gingerbread, Maclaw's AOSP ICS and Jellybean), I would be grateful if you would share them. Cheers!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
buddy you can try AOSP ics of olddroid its also fast stable and offers descent battery life
here it is http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2196926
good luck:good::good:
Blackbox421 said:
What do you want more? I mean we have one aosp for gb, ics and jb.
If a developer would make another aosp rom, it would be more or less the same rom.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is not a matter of "want". As I stated in my thread, this is not a request. I was just being curious, to be honest. Maybe, I was not clear. I also meant that AOSP ROMs are not used as base ROMs. Maybe, CM is more favorable towards that. Anyway, thanks for the input, valid point you made,
aditya rathee said:
buddy you can try AOSP ics of olddroid its also fast stable and offers descent battery life
here it is http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2196926
good luck:good::good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the suggestion, appreciate it. There is no download link in the thread though. If you have one you can PM me. Seems something is fishy about that thread.
Aditya please give me its link
Thanks sir
blugonjic said:
Thanks for the suggestion, appreciate it. There is no download link in the thread though. If you have one you can PM me. Seems something is fishy about that thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i will see what i can do
blugonjic said:
Thanks for the suggestion, appreciate it. There is no download link in the thread though. If you have one you can PM me. Seems something is fishy about that thread.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
here it is buddy
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2196926&page=7
in the first post of mr viper its written AOSP 4.0.4 rc1 in red colour click it and download the file
good luck :good::laugh::good::good:
aditya rathee said:
here it is buddy
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2196926&page=7
in the first post of mr viper its written AOSP 4.0.4 rc1 in red colour click it and download the file
good luck :good::laugh::good::good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This link doesn't work As OD said he deleted the rc1 so can anyone reupload?? Please.
The Wolverine1800 said:
This link doesn't work As OD said he deleted the rc1 so can anyone reupload?? Please.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
did you trued what i said i mean clicked on red written aosp rc1 in mr viper's post cos i downloaded the rom from there
aditya rathee said:
did you trued what i said i mean clicked on red written aosp rc1 in mr viper's post cos i downloaded the rom from there
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup, we tried. It leads to some dummy site sadly
aditya rathee said:
did you trued what i said i mean clicked on red written aosp rc1 in mr viper's post cos i downloaded the rom from there
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I tried and it doesn't work.Please reupload
The Wolverine1800 said:
Yeah I tried and it doesn't work.Please reupload
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok let me try
---------- Post added at 09:41 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:40 AM ----------
blugonjic said:
Yup, we tried. It leads to some dummy site sadly
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
when i click it in my pc idm opens and we can download it
i would upload it if olddroid allows me i will ask to tem about this matter
it is because aosp is based purely on armv7+ devices and not armv6
and cm is adapted to support ore types of sockets and such
wich is why its easier to build cm then aosp
Sent from my S500 using xda app-developers app
SpaceCaker said:
it is because aosp is based purely on armv7+ devices and not armv6
and cm is adapted to support ore types of sockets and such
wich is why its easier to build cm then aosp
Sent from my S500 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks a lot! That was the answer I was looking for. Makes sense why we have so little AOSP then. And btw, your GB AOSP is one
of my favorite ROMs. Cheers!
If someone needs OldDroid AOSP ICS RC1, PM me.