Database Develop

Will our Galaxy Mini's/Pop's get Jelly Bean?

Hello everybody. I want to ask our developers, will we get Android 4.1? If not - why, if yes - when? Thanks for answers .

I m not a developer but i can say we can only get jb frm cm sources
Otherwise it is difficult to port aosp build
If sir maclaw and team successfully make working aosp ics for armv6 we can probabily get jb too

vishal007 said:
I m not a developer but i can say we can only get jb frm cm sources
Otherwise it is difficult to port aosp build
If sir maclaw and team successfully make working aosp ics for armv6 we can probabily get jb too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Best Regards

It is hard to get a stable ics as of now it is goin to take minimum 6 to 7 seven months before a bugfree ics and then only we can look forward to jb we muat have patience.
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda app-developers app

Well, when the sources are out, we'll see about that

Patience is a virtue moreover there isn't much difference in user looks
Just a few add ons here and there moreover I doubt about how will this device go on with jb.But anyways well see that expect stable jb for our device by early 2013.Many experimental build will start popping out soon

vishal007 said:
I m not a developer but i can say we can only get jb frm cm sources
Otherwise it is difficult to port aosp build
If sir maclaw and team successfully make working aosp ics for armv6 we can probabily get jb too
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
GOOD NEWS !
MACLAW SUCCESS MAKE AOSP WORKING FOR ARM V6 !!!!! :victory:

kagamineryuki said:
GOOD NEWS !
MACLAW SUCCESS MAKE AOSP WORKING FOR ARM V6 !!!!! :victory:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
congrats
but its only for gio till now may be ace too but maclaw didnt tell any news for mini/fit aosp
they r saying they dont hav device to work on :crying:

vishal007 said:
congrats
but its only for gio till now may be ace too but maclaw didnt tell any news for mini/fit aosp
they r saying they dont hav device to work on :crying:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
owww, that's why maclaw search for volunteer who have galaxy mini
btw thanks for information
sorry for my bad english

there won't be fully working ics/jb because no one willing to re-write damn codecs... y'all have fully working cm7, be happy with that, or buy yourself nexus s or one x, which have ics from the start. Peoples! Stop dreaming and expecting wonders from heavily outdated phone!

Maybe the devs will do something, if the rest of the people is willing to wait!

AOKP build with modified libstagefrighthw.so can play 720p @ ~10 (maybe more) fps, HQ youtube works ( as testers reported ). If AntiBillOS will give permissions camera will be working with 3rd party apps too. So... it's not so impossible after all.

Ok, so camera will work, but only ON HACKS. That's great, really. How about stability of os? :>

no ways thank god if you get ics for dialy use another cm10 project awaits macclaw

ajay8055 said:
no ways thank god if you get ics for dialy use another cm10 project awaits macclaw
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no, cm10 will be android 5.0... jellybean will be cm9.1 or something like that, since jellybean is just an update of ics...

yackovsky said:
no, cm10 will be android 5.0... jellybean will be cm9.1 or something like that, since jellybean is just an update of ics...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
might be if we get a stable ics we can get jelly bean to work..but we need something out of the ordinary

ajay8055 said:
no ways thank god if you get ics for dialy use another cm10 project awaits macclaw
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
From latest Marcin comments, GalaxyICS will drop Mini / Fit support.
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda app-developers app

yackovsky said:
there won't be fully working ics/jb because no one willing to re-write damn codecs... y'all have fully working cm7, be happy with that, or buy yourself nexus s or one x, which have ics from the start. Peoples! Stop dreaming and expecting wonders from heavily outdated phone!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yup, i agree with u. The only issue with cm9 (for me at least) is the lack of RAM, i dont care abt the "crappy camera" or "useless" FM.

all devices haing cm9 or aosp ics can run jellybean

goutamniwas said:
all devices haing cm9 or aosp ics can run jellybean
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ok, but the question is not if they can, because it's obvious that galaxy mini is able to run ics/jb, the question is: can it be runned smoothly on low end phone? and i'm only guessing that the answer is no, because of extremely low specs (compared to other phones nowaday) of galaxy mini

JB AOKP build?

When do we get a AOKP build based on 4.1.1 JB?
Anybody knows?

You mean this?

No.
AOKP = Android Open Kang Project
One of the most powerful custom roms I know.

No eta
Sent from my SGH-I727 using xda premium

afaik they are working on it but nothing done yet. check the official site:
www.aokp.co
whenever its released that will be the first place you will find it!

fpdragon said:
No.
AOKP = Android Open Kang Project
One of the most powerful custom roms I know.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That'll teach me to skim-read

Ported!

Posted: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1824273

Very nice but I have a GT-P7300 and not the GT-P7310
Any chance to fix the boot problems?

fpdragon said:
Very nice but I have a GT-P7300 and not the GT-P7310
Any chance to fix the boot problems?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
uploading for the P7300

P7300 build uploaded

on dev section i think we have illusion ROM and CM 10 Perview
maybe still unofficial but lets hope for this thing will be official

cebonk said:
on dev section i think we have illusion ROM and CM 10 Perview
maybe still unofficial but lets hope for this thing will be official
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Keep in mind CM ≠ AOKP, and without a fully working ROM Control...well, that's AOKP's essence. Romanbb and company are working on it. Patience is a virtue.

safariking said:
P7300 build uploaded
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
tried this.. i think uploaded the wrong rom.. it is actually kallt_kaffe's 08-08-2012 7310 build..

Kk's CM10 build was sweet. I also tried the aosp jb version and I like the rom too. I am actually waiting for the first of either one to get updated so that we have a fully functional and stable rom of jb. Right now both rooms have its shortcomings. But it's better than the stock honeycomb version.
Sent from my GT-P7310 using Tapatalk 2

Am I alone in wanting ICS/CM9?

The Jelly Bean ROM's are great, but for me there's just too many bugs.
We have the ICS source now and I'd love a stable CM9 build. Unfortunately it looks like attn1 may have moved on, and all the other devs seem to be just working on JB.

Dude your not alone...count me in for that...if i knw step by step guide to at least to compile an AOSP kernel I would do it now

i ll waiting too but however stable cm9 or cm 10 doesnt exisit by now
Be patient

No I'm waiting for CM9 o CM10 too for a valid porting of MIUI

Everyone is waiting for CM9 but we need a kernel to get everything working propably! Our devs are working on it but they have a life, too. Don't expect sb to do a one-man Jesus show here;D Be patient, we will get fully working CM9 when kernel boots up
And in the future you can post stuff like this in our famous OFF-Topic-thread Keeps the G-Sec clean

Raithmir said:
The Jelly Bean ROM's are great, but for me there's just too many bugs.
We have the ICS source now and I'd love a stable CM9 build. Unfortunately it looks like attn1 may have moved on, and all the other devs seem to be just working on JB.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It doesn't really matter much which ROM to make - ICS based or JB based CM. Because to make a proper and stable ROM, all you need is to make a stable AOSP\AOKP compatible kernel (and we still don't have one).
PS: AFAIK CM team wont add CM9 support for any more devices, i.e. if they will make a CM for our IncS it will be JB based CM10 and not CM9.

I thought that once we had sources, the kernel would be pretty easy, but then I don't know much about it. Who is working on the kernel?
I also thought that CM would only support a phone if source was available. Since we only have ICS source right now, that would rule out CM10 wouldn't it?
Sent from my Incredible S using Tapatalk 2

Raithmir said:
I thought that once we had sources, the kernel would be pretty easy, but then I don't know much about it. Who is working on the kernel?
I also thought that CM would only support a phone if source was available. Since we only have ICS source right now, that would rule out CM10 wouldn't it?
Sent from my Incredible S using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Many of the CM10 ROMs don't have manufacturer source for JB (only ICS) therefore it is safe to assume that our ICS kernel can be used with CM10.

If we want official support we need a maintainer
The maintainer for the 7x30 HTC devices like ours, dhd, desire s etc
Our maintainer, Kali- moved on to Sony devices iirc
If we ask nexx and nk111 (cm devs from desire s) nicely maybe they might build for us
Sent from my HTC Incredible S

I understand that attn1 is still our maintainer.

weaselEST said:
I understand that attn1 is still our maintainer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Orly? Anyone heard from him/her?
Sent from my HTC Incredible S

I sent him a tweet some time ago after he bought S3 and I wrote something like this: "So you're not the maintainer for IncS anymore". And he replied "What makes you think that" . He still owns a vivo and a vivos.
Sent from my Incredible S using xda premium

weaselEST said:
I sent him a tweet some time ago after he bought S3 and I wrote something like this: "So you're not the maintainer for IncS anymore". And he replied "What makes you think that" . He still owns a vivo and a vivos.
Sent from my Incredible S using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's good, hopefully he can compile CM10 soon and bring official support for CM9/10
I would be very grateful of that

I really want CM9 without any bug. Even now im usin CM7! i didt find any ICS AOSP rom. So im thinking about change my phone
Plz coock it...
Sent from my Incredible S using Tapatalk 2

[Q] Why not Port Roms?

Hi guys! Im curious why our monster device dont have too much ported roms though it is possible? is it because there is only few users? I want to learn how to port roms for our device. Im reading a tutorial here in XDA and have a porter friend from my past device. I asked him to port roms for our device like slimbean, carbonrom, Pac etc. Hope this device gets more attention from the rom makers

marshygeek said:
Hi guys! Im curious why our monster device dont have too much ported roms though it is possible? is it because there is only few users? I want to learn how to port roms for our device. Im reading a tutorial here in XDA and have a porter friend from my past device. I asked him to port roms for our device like slimbean, carbonrom, Pac etc. Hope this device gets more attention from the rom makers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I will help you as much as i can...will share links which i have read to port MIUI V5 for our device...
And the reason that our device does not has many roms is that it was not released globally like the S3 or S4...
It is actually local only to Korea...and still many have managed to get it...
And its good if we all work together as a team ... we sure will have many roms for our device too....:good:

Shrewdy said:
I will help you as much as i can...will share links which i have read to port MIUI V5 for our device...
And the reason that our device does not has many roms is that it was not released globally like the S3 or S4...
It is actually local only to Korea...and still many have managed to get it...
And its good if we all work together as a team ... we sure will have many roms for our device too....:good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's good news! I will talk to my friend who ports rom to my ex-device. and also let's ask for other members to participate.

This is the link that im reviewing http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1908008
We need Base CM10 or CM10.1 depending on what we will port. Do we have "Clean" CM10 or CM10.1 as base?

marshygeek said:
This is the link that im reviewing http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1908008
We need Base CM10 or CM10.1 depending on what we will port. Do we have "Clean" CM10 or CM10.1 as base?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup, even i am referring to the same guide...
Now as far as i know we do have a clean CM10 as base for SHV-E120L & SHV-E120S both...but we dont have a pure clean CM10.1 for either of the devices...
But we do have Mokee OS 4.2.2 for both of the above mentioned devices...and i even tried to take CM10.1 from Cyanogen mods website and take Mokee OS as base to port the latest to CM10.1 and have a running CM10.1 but i never succedded...
And i was also wondering if you know what is the difference between these 2 devices...
Thanks

Thats what i dont know. Im just a new user of this device. If we have clean CM10 then we can port 4.1.2 roms. but not 4.2.2. It's OK there are lot of nice 4.1.2 roms out there Can u give me the link of the clean CM10 for SHV e120L?

Shrewdy said:
Yup, even i am referring to the same guide...
Now as far as i know we do have a clean CM10 as base for SHV-E120L & SHV-E120S both...but we dont have a pure clean CM10.1 for either of the devices...
But we do have Mokee OS 4.2.2 for both of the above mentioned devices...and i even tried to take CM10.1 from Cyanogen mods website and take Mokee OS as base to port the latest to CM10.1 and have a running CM10.1 but i never succedded...
And i was also wondering if you know what is the difference between these 2 devices...
Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeas there is Mokee 4.2.2 and ive tried it. Its base on CM10.1. We must first know what did the porter used as a base to port Mokee 4.2.2.

marshygeek said:
Yeas there is Mokee 4.2.2 and ive tried it. Its base on CM10.1. We must first know what did the porter used as a base to port Mokee 4.2.2.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK, check these links
This link contains pure CM10 compiled by Socim:
http://d-h.st/users/Space/?fld_id=0#files
And this link contains a spread sheet which mentions most of the roms that exist for our devices...
https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AosAjYg4w51XdHkxNlRzWFk4UllTTHFNd1JpLW9TWHc&pli=1#gid=19
Hope this helps...:good:

Ok i will try using Socim's CM10 as base.

What about LiquidSmooth Rom ?

This is question for developers and porters.Why no one is porting new builds of liquidsmooth rom since it is for me best rom for our phone.I am still flashing old demetris build...

dimi89 said:
This is question for developers and porters.Why no one is porting new builds of liquidsmooth rom since it is for me best rom for our phone.I am still flashing old demetris build...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry to ask for this, I know I should install and test for myself the rom,
But I just would like to know how is the battery life on this rom?
What about the power button? Does it work properly? Because I had this issue on android 4.3 based rom's.
And the camera? Clear images and sharper?
Thanks in advance!
Best Regards from Brazil
By the way, in my opinion android 4.2.2 is the most stable atm

Rafael Cardoso said:
Sorry to ask for this, I know I should install and test for myself the rom,
But I just would like to know how is the battery life on this rom?
What about the power button? Does it work properly? Because I had this issue on android 4.3 based rom's.
And the camera? Clear images and sharper?
Thanks in advance!
Best Regards from Brazil
By the way, in my opinion android 4.2.2 is the most stable atm
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Build that we currently have ported by Demetris is 4.2.2 and for me it is the best custom rom out there.Camera and battery are great even with stock app and stock kernel.Alwayse switching between MIUI and LiquidSmooth.Flash it and test is for couple of days yourself and see if you are satisfied.
Greetings from Serbia

what bugs does it have?
Sent from my AOSP 4.3 Xperia S via Tapatalk

Ben36 said:
what bugs does it have?
Sent from my AOSP 4.3 Xperia S via Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Test it or read the last few posts of the rom thread.
Not that hard, is it?
Sent from my 4X HD via XDA Premium

it's also not hard for the devs to just put them in the OP but they all seem scared to admit there are bugs on this forum
Sent from my AOSP 4.3 Xperia S via Tapatalk

dimi89 said:
Build that we currently have ported by Demetris is 4.2.2 and for me it is the best custom rom out there.Camera and battery are great even with stock app and stock kernel.Alwayse switching between MIUI and LiquidSmooth.Flash it and test is for couple of days yourself and see if you are satisfied.
Greetings from Serbia
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@dimi89 Dimi! Thank you again! You have already answered me on another post, and again here, with the same education and niceness
Thanks, I flashed LiquidSmooth rom and until this moment, no problems at all.. everything ok with iodak kernel v8 10.1..
Greetings from Brazil

Ben36 said:
it's also not hard for the devs to just put them in the OP but they all seem scared to admit there are bugs on this forum
Sent from my AOSP 4.3 Xperia S via Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's even easier for YOU to test it yourself. Backup your current setup and flash it. Most of the mentioned bugs aren't even for everybody and it is actually quite hard for the devs to make a full list of bugs which occur for every single user.
If you don't agree with that it's your fault. The devs are doing an awesome job here and they do it because they want to.
Sent from my 4X HD via XDA Premium

In my honest opinion, bugs should be on the OP if they are known bugs. It's a matter of structure and information. But that's just me
From what I understood, carbon is a "fork" from Liquid and I think it's a compilation from source and not a port, right? If so, is it possible to compile Liquid from source as well ?
This question is for someone who knows or a developer

MidnightDevil said:
In my honest opinion, bugs should be on the OP if they are known bugs. It's a matter of structure and information. But that's just me
From what I understood, carbon is a "fork" from Liquid and I think it's a compilation from source and not a port, right? If so, is it possible to compile Liquid from source as well ?
This question is for someone who knows or a developer
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They stated that Carbon rom doesnt have anything to do with liquid team.Also if you look at title on older liquid builds by demetris you will see it says "Official" so i think it is possible to compile from source.Asked demetris long time ago about liquid future for our phone but still no answer.

dimi89 said:
They stated that Carbon rom doesnt have anything to do with liquid team.Also if you look at title on older liquid builds by demetris you will see it says "Official" so i think it is possible to compile from source.Asked demetris long time ago about liquid future for our phone but still no answer.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, they stated the following:
CarbonRom is an aftermarket firmware based on the Android Open Source Project. The team is composed of former members of Team Liquid who have forked the code in an attempt to bring greater speed, better coding, and full authorship to code. We are in no way affiliated with Liquid0624. The rom was forked at Liquid beta 3.2.1 and has since undergone major code changes and modifications.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They "forked" the code, although it was changed a LOT, a fork is a fork
Anyway, I'm gonna have a look later on see if Liquid can be compiled for our p880.
Thanks dimi :good:

MidnightDevil said:
No, they stated the following:
They "forked" the code, although it was changed a LOT, a fork is a fork
Anyway, I'm gonna have a look later on see if Liquid can be compiled for our p880.
Thanks dimi :good:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No,THANK you man Someone sayed that all 4.2 builds are much better then 4.3 roms builds and i agree on that.

Far as I understood the source is published.
Will see what I can do during the weekend
https://github.com/LiquidSmooth/android
And yeah, I agree, I'm pretty happy with CM10. 1.3. Although I do miss the privacy features from 4.3.

Mods can lock and delete this since demerits answered our prayers and ported new version.
Sent from my microwave.