Hii all,
I am confused between cm, aokp, aosp and pac type rom.
Developers make the rom but they dont explain the advantage/disadvantage of these type of rom.
Can someone explain me what are these, there differences and advantages of each rom?
Thanks Gaurenteed..
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app
well cm means(cyanogen mod) they are devs share their sources and its good one.
aokp means(android open kang project) and also they are devs share their sources and sure its diffrent from cm.
aosp(android open source project) that type google it self make it and share their sources and its the clear android version without any changes just the original view that nexus devices have.
and pac means (paranoid +aopk + cm) that means this kind of roms have the whole those thing above together in one rom and its pretty awsome
and for me i used cm10.1 by biel and use scripts (this make the rom more smooth and more active ) so i used the script by slaid480 and it called(fly on mod) and everyghing work good for me
thats it
hope you understand
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app
nizar.nasani said:
well cm means(cyanogen mod) they are devs share their sources and its good one.
aokp means(android open kang project) and also they are devs share their sources and sure its diffrent from cm.
aosp(android open source project) that type google it self make it and share their sources and its the clear android version without any changes just the original view that nexus devices have.
and pac means (paranoid +aopk + cm) that means this kind of roms have the whole those thing above together in one rom and its pretty awsome
and for me i used cm10.1 by biel and use scripts (this make the rom more smooth and more active ) so i used the script by slaid480 and it called(fly on mod) and everyghing work good for me
thats it
hope you understand
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kangs are usually works by devs who carry on development of a released project (which was left by its original devs)
Sent From my GT-S5830.
Current Rom-The Ultimatum
Kernel-Fire OC Kernel
Audio Manager-BEATS
Hit Thanks you unthankful $*%$&. Its There For A Reason.
Unnamed.Ace.User said:
Kangs are usually works by devs who carry on development of a released project (which was left by its original devs)
Sent From my GT-S5830.
Current Rom-The Ultimatum
Kernel-Fire OC Kernel
Audio Manager-BEATS
Hit Thanks you unthankful $*%$&. Its There For A Reason.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Advantage?
Disadvantage of one over other?
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app
devm2024 said:
Advantage?
Disadvantage of one over other?
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have only used CM(7.2) till now...
But here is what i know/read and can sum up:
•AOSP-Best ones (performance wise). They are most stable since they are official. They are released only after extreme alpha and beta phases... but not as customizable as others.
•AOKP: They are modded versions of AOSP. Customizable. But I have read somewhere that they drain a lot of battery.
•CM: More fast. More Stable. They are the ones that give you unofficial releases of ICS, JB, etc.
•PAC: Its a hybrid. Cant guarantee battery life. But can be awesome if you put it to use in right way.
However, if you are new to flashing, I'd recommend CM 7.2 (further ones are not as stable as 7.2)... Rest can be used after you get hold of things.
But its up to you to decide.
Best Of Luck....
Plz hit thanks if you think this was helpful.
Sent from my GT-S3850
Cheers!
Xiao
Unnamed.Ace.User said:
I have only used CM(7.2) till now...
But here is what i know/read and can sum up:
•AOSP-Best ones (performance wise). They are most stable since they are official. They are released only after extreme alpha and beta phases... but not as customizable as others.
•AOKP: They are modded versions of AOSP. Customizable. But I have read somewhere that they drain a lot of battery.
•CM: More fast. More Stable. They are the ones that give you unofficial releases of ICS, JB, etc.
•PAC: Its a hybrid. Cant guarantee battery life. But can be awesome if you put it to use in right way.
However, if you are new to flashing, I'd recommend CM 7.2 (further ones are not as stable as 7.2)... Rest can be used after you get hold of things.
But its up to you to decide.
Best Of Luck....
Plz hit thanks if you think this was helpful.
Sent from my GT-S3850
Cheers!
Xiao
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Everyone have different experience with roms...i have same battery life with aokp and cm10.1,but i use aokp as its faster and smoother..aosp is smoother than cm and aokp,but its not customizable.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app
In simple words,
1) CM offers customisation and control but not as handy as aokp.
2) AOSP roms are the ones that offer no customisation at all unlike cm, aokp etc. They just give you the pure Android experience like your stock rom.
3) Paranoid Android is famously known for bringing tablet like ui on phones with customisation & controls much similar to cm.
4) PAC rom is an integration of all, i.e., aokp, cm and paranoid android.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Venomous Viper 119 said:
In simple words,
1) CM offers customisation and control but not as handy as aokp.
2) AOSP roms are the ones that offer no customisation at all unlike cm, aokp etc. They just give you the pure Android experience like your stock rom.
3) Paranoid Android is famously known for bringing tablet like ui on phones with customisation & controls much similar to cm.
4) PAC rom is an integration of all, i.e., aokp, cm and paranoid android.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That was informative
Sent from my GT-S3850
Cheers!
Xiao
Unnamed.Ace.User said:
That was informative
Sent from my GT-S3850
Cheers!
Xiao
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
thienthan6x1 said:
thank you you
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dont say it just hit it
how to know whic rom i am using whether its aosp,aokp,cm or pac
jesuinodsa said:
how to know whic rom i am using whether its aosp,aokp,cm or pac
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
settings --> about
Related
There are Only 2 Types of ROMS:
1) Stock Based
2) Cyanogenmod Based
so cant any1 create any new base ROM
Paranoid android
Aokp both also eist
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
CoolCatGetHome said:
Paranoid android
Aokp both also eist
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I kinf of get the op idea, and both paranoid and aokp are cm9/cm7/jelly bean based
Be a lot easier if libaries and other nececities were updated for ARMv6 past GB on AOSP.
Lewa, its cm based, but heavily modded.
kvrjsoni said:
There are Only 2 Types of ROMS:
1) Stock Based
2) Cyanogenmod Based
so cant any1 create any new base ROM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Waiting for you to make one from scratch
Sent from Ursa's claws.
I am a nood at developing
I can learn but due to lack of time i am unable to learn
But someday-someone will surely make a new base ROM
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
You seem to have took away other aftermarket ROMs like CyanMobile , GingerDX , AOKP and even Oxygen ROM
Sent from Ursa's claws.
speriance rom is one good ROM too.
Guys,
I tried the AOKP Schizoid rom, which has too many controls within and a odd setup for screen based buttons, and then i tried the unofficial CM10 preview which has issues of its own. I am still running the ICS rom that came out, with no camera working.
What is the best rom to flash via CWM.
Thanks !
If you want an AOSP based ROM you can grab the slim ROM from my CM10AOKP thread.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda premium
There is a camera fix you can flash for CM9. Its in the development forum.
What I will never understand is how CM ROMs always come out with broken cameras, yet someone else always manages to make a camera fix. Its almost like the folks at CM hate cameras, and maybe even break them on purpose.
sent from a secret underground bunker
mjben said:
Its almost like the folks at CM hate cameras, and maybe even break them on purpose.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was having a bad day till now, thanks
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using xda premium
-SGA- said:
If you want an AOSP based ROM you can grab the slim ROM from my CM10AOKP thread.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-T989 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks ! I did load it up, but the AOSP keyboard kept on crashing, along with no buttons for settings.....is that normal for your ROM ?
LMK ! Thanks !
slim rom is experimental and a work in progress at the moment.
CM have about 25 million users worldwide, and now Cm11 is taking a huge step forward by using this new easy way to upgrade the smartphone system. Omni Rom 4.4 is a new project, with great and promising fectures and developers. What is the best way to go? They will be nearly the same?
For me there is only CM I`m a big fan since CM 9 ...but i think you should test both and make your own decision what works better for you ...
sorry for this ,but in the end it is subjective where your own preferences are ...
Oliv3go said:
CM have about 25 million users worldwide, and now Cm11 is taking a huge step forward by using this new easy way to upgrade the smartphone system. Omni Rom 4.4 is a new project, with great and promising fectures and developers. What is the best way to go? They will be nearly the same?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This boils down to personal preference. They won't be the same - CM will have features that Omni doesn't, and vice versa.
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk
Thanks for your reply. Maybe is time to try the dual boot mod for i9000.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
To test both ? :good:
Oliv3go said:
Thanks for your reply. Maybe is time to try the dual boot mod for i9000.
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mackay ROM !!
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
Well, I'd try cm11, it works really smooth and the new cminstaler makes life easier to newbies
Enviado desde mi GT-I9000 mediante Tapatalk
Oh you tested the new installer??? I thought that pawitp don`t support our device with this ...
jorgecft said:
Well, I'd try cm11, it works really smooth and the new cminstaler makes life easier to newbies
Enviado desde mi GT-I9000 mediante Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
both are good
i think CM11 is a very good rom. i have Mackay KK 4.1.1 on my Galaxy i9000 and it is very very smooth and stable. I also test Mackay Omni rom alpha and i think it is also an interesting Rom.
freakymod2120 said:
Oh you tested the new installer??? I thought that pawitp don`t support our device with this ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use cm11 4.4.1 ..it's very nice the new system update. Works fine in every aspect
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Sorry i was wrong...you mean the cm updater in CM itself and not the cminstaller for bringing CM to your device with rooting first time and so on ....now it is clear...
Oliv3go said:
I use cm11 4.4.1 ..it's very nice the new system update. Works fine in every aspect
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think Omnirom will be great, they're focusing their attention on under-the-hood features of great interest:
Multiwindows,
Delta update,
Reworked DSP
OmniFile
and their development plan will make Omnirom an really appreciated rom
M0Rf30 said:
I think Omnirom will be great, they're focusing their attention on under-the-hood features of great interest:
Multiwindows,
Delta update,
Reworked DSP
OmniFile
and their development plan will make Omnirom an really appreciated rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Multi Windows!!!!? if that 's right then this will be the best ROM for i9000.
But omnirom is still in alpha mode with many issues pending to be solved.
CM nightly have very little minor bugs which can be ignored. I love it. I am using cyanAOSP 1.4.0 KitKat ROM based on CM11 and it is awesome.
this is my 100th post, and finally a senior member on XDA. yippie!!!!
I'm not sure that multi windows is going to be much use to us on a 4" screen..
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
I think that we will never see multi windows on i9000 anyway...
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda app-developers app
Good. It's a stupid idea IMO lol
Sent from my GT-I9000 using Tapatalk
my personal opinion (and wish) for every ROM/kernel developer would be to focus on power consumption. I have tried many ROM and read too many threads...Not a single ROM/kernel can reach stock ROM's deep sleep figures
aris_p said:
my personal opinion (and wish) for every ROM/kernel developer would be to focus on power consumption. I have tried many ROM and read too many threads...Not a single ROM/kernel can reach stock ROM's deep sleep figures
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is only so much you can do, especially since you're running firmware intended for stronger devices, with dual and quad cores being the norm for ICS/JB nowadays
Sent from my GT-P7510 using Tapatalk
I have modded the source of CM10.1 and added some KitKat features. Compiled with Linaro toolchain. And now debugging it.
Here's the link to the test ROMs.
Tester please test it. And developers please help me.
Screenshots in attachments
Builds are final for kernel and resources. Now will port KitKat specific apps
THIS ROM IS NOT FOR DAILY USE YET
Kernel source
Thanks to AndroidARMv6, CyanogenMod and Google
Test ROM 1
Initial Release
Test ROM 2
Changes:
fixed platlogo issue
updated kernel
Test ROM 3
Changes:
Changed a few res.
Updated kernel
Downloading and Testing!!!
rhar**** said:
Test ROM 2
Changes:
fixed platlogo issue
updated kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So it is not just a themed cm10.1! :thumbup::thumbup:
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
nomancoolboy said:
So it is not just a themed cm10.1! :thumbup::thumbup:
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup. I have changed the source files n debugging them
Its solid so far ..... Can you tell us what to test out for you ? Everything is working great
Thanks Bro
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
johnhale said:
Its solid so far ..... Can you tell us what to test out for you ? Everything is working great
Thanks Bro
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Test everything. And look for layout bugs more.
I will also test it later on today. I'm presently using your other ROM and I am quite pleased with it .
What is actually the difference between them? I got the impression both are based on cm10.1 with some KK additions?
Can anyone post simple screenshots please?
Thanks,
Marco Marinho
jaibar said:
I will also test it later on today. I'm presently using your other ROM and I am quite pleased with it .
What is actually the difference between them? I got the impression both are based on cm10.1 with some KK additions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This ROM is compiled from edited source, with features from KitKat. The older one was cm10.1 made to look like KitKat with some of its features
_MarcoMarinho_ said:
Can anyone post simple screenshots please?
Thanks,
Marco Marinho
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont have screenshots. Jus two of em. I'll upload them soon
EDIT: Uploaded
Congrats and salutations! Gone beyond cooking and actually into development. Welcome aboard.
As I said, I am using cm10.2. Has bluetooth problem (partly better but not really well-behaved in cm10.1) but it does run much nicer than cm10.1. Also prefer its notifications features. Of course, sources you backport might gain some more speed and smoothness for your hybrid as well. As far as I got with cm11 experimentals, bluetooth turned on and off like in the old days. Found KitKat too dependent on Chromium which is armv7 so lets out our devices. So maybe your approach is the way to go. Are you daring to touch ART (OK, your ROMs are a work of art)??
What are you doing about selinux? Old recoveries will flash the ROM?
Fix camera default exposure? Have everyone eating out of your hand
All the best. Watching this one!
Dovidhalevi said:
Congrats and salutations! Gone beyond cooking and actually into development. Welcome aboard.
As I said, I am using cm10.2. Has bluetooth problem (partly better but not really well-behaved in cm10.1) but it does run much nicer than cm10.1. Also prefer its notifications features. Of course, sources you backport might gain some more speed and smoothness for your hybrid as well. As far as I got with cm11 experimentals, bluetooth turned on and off like in the old days. Found KitKat too dependent on Chromium which is armv7 so lets out our devices. So maybe your approach is the way to go. Are you daring to touch ART (OK, your ROMs are a work of art)??
What are you doing about selinux? Old recoveries will flash the ROM?
Fix camera default exposure? Have everyone eating out of your hand
All the best. Watching this one!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just ported small features till now. selinux and all are from cm10.1. So will be compatible with old kernels too.
And camera exposure an things are secondary, as can use third party apps as of now.
And thanks for wishes
I tested the ROM and it seems having no problems but the cm10.1 ones. It looks just like a themed ROM. Good luck for next versions and I have a request . can you plz build a paranoid android ROM under 4.3.1? THX in advance
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda app-developers app
borchaniz said:
I tested the ROM and it seems having no problems but the cm10.1 ones. It looks just like a themed ROM. Good luck for next versions and I have a request . can you plz build a paranoid android ROM under 4.3.1? THX in advance
Sent from my LG-P500 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can try to. At least for Paranoid Android 4.2
rhar**** said:
I can try to. At least for Paranoid Android 4.2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wish you try
Sent from my LG-P500 using Tapatalk
Does anyone know how to change Resources according to theme of apps?
Like Holo dark background is activated when an app uses holo.dark theme and Holo light background when an app uses holo.light theme
I need it ASAP as i'm gonna compile another test build
Really amazing rom .!
Using it from 24 hours ..
Still no slow downs ..
Sent from my LG-P500 using Tapatalk
Was sick for past few days. But guys, don't worry. I'm all fine now with the last test build.
Link: https://www.mediafire.com/?pxjb3ylm0no0nqt
rhar**** said:
Was sick for past few days. But guys, don't worry. I'm all fine now with the last test build.
Link: https://www.mediafire.com/?pxjb3ylm0no0nqt
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Changelog please:what::what:
Sent from my LG-P500 using Tapatalk
Can somebody please explain the differences between carbon ROM & CM? All the 4.4 ROMs look/feel the same to me apart from the awful sounds in carbon ROM.
I appreciate all the hard work the devs put in to making the ROMs. Iv been using maclaws 4.4 since initial release & its perfect for my needs.
Sent from my GT-I8190 using xda app-developers app
omarblu said:
Can somebody please explain the differences between carbon ROM & CM? All the 4.4 ROMs look/feel the same to me apart from the awful sounds in carbon ROM.
I appreciate all the hard work the devs put in to making the ROMs. Iv been using maclaws 4.4 since initial release & its perfect for my needs.
Sent from my GT-I8190 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if its comparision sorry buddy cant help [forum rules] why cant u check out videos in youtube about carbon rom and cm
Yeah I've googled it. They "sound" very different but in practice they feel the same.
I'm only asking for the main differences between them.
Back in the days of 4.1 ROMs dmod etc all the ROMs were very different. Now they don't seem that way.
Sent from my GT-I8190 using xda app-developers app
I think that they are very different in the settings but their interface is the same cause they are all basedon the aosp project. If you want to see the differences search videos read the Rom posts or just download them and try them both....
Sent from my GT-I8190 using Tapatalk
omarblu said:
Can somebody please explain the differences between carbon ROM & CM? All the 4.4 ROMs look/feel the same to me apart from the awful sounds in carbon ROM.
I appreciate all the hard work the devs put in to making the ROMs. Iv been using maclaws 4.4 since initial release & its perfect for my needs.
Sent from my GT-I8190 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i can't compare them but i can tell you both are different from system as other roms are different from scripts, smoothness etc, etc. This is the same case if you want to know wich rom is better we can't help you with that but we can recommend you one
omarblu said:
Yeah I've googled it. They "sound" very different but in practice they feel the same.
I'm only asking for the main differences between them.
Back in the days of 4.1 ROMs dmod etc all the ROMs were very different. Now they don't seem that way.
Sent from my GT-I8190 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
you say back in 4.1 days you know these roms existed in those days its only last year ok ,dmod is by mr dariolob its just only mod name
but cm carbon aokp pac my favorite miui these are large communities for different devices officially they does not support our phone
but thanks to maclaw and thehacka1 we got them unofficially
but dmod is a classic rom for touchwiz lovers