Database Develop

Warranty Woes - help please!!

recently my camera failed and the x1 went back to Sony, I've now had an email saying the phone is unrepairable and I have to pay £10 to have it returned unfixed.
I called them up and they say the mainboard is bent and not covered under warranty. The case is perfect, the screen is perfect and the phone has never been dropped etc.. They said this can happen even when the phone is in a pocket or bag but classed as accidental damage so not covered. They also said it's not a replacement part and I would need to buy a whole new phone, even if I was happy to pay for repair myself.
Is this right? Do they have to prove it was dropped? Is there no way of getting this fixed even if it costs me? Who can I complain to about this?
Thanks for any advice you can give..........

What country do you live in? And has this issue happened within 6 months?
If in the UK, you may be covered by 'The Sale of Goods Act 1979' if you believe the phone was not of satisfactory quality (plus a few others reasons). However as far as I know, this would protect you from the seller, not SE.
Put simply, goods are expected to last a reasonable amount of time within normal usage (which i would argue means keeping within your pocket). If it breaks within 6 months, it is the sellers responsibility to prove that it was fit for use at the time it was sold (very hard for them to do if others are working fine). After 6 months you have another 5.5 years (4.5 years in Scotland) where you are still protected but it your responsibility to prove the goods were unfit at the time of sale.
Might be worth a shot. Info can be found on the website for BBCs Watchdog TV program: http://www.bbc.co.uk/watchdog/consumer_advice/consumer_law_sale_of_goods_emp.shtml

thanks for that, unfortunately i've had it for about 9 months so SOGA won't be easy for me to prove. I just cant get how they say it has been damaged by me, there's no signs of dropping, the phone is absolutely mint! I'm very mad indeed

the same thing has just happened to me with vodafone in the uk.
phone was sent back to the service centre as some of the keys on the right-hand side of the keyboard were working intermittantly which i believe is a common issue.
the phone was returned to me with a blurry picture of what may or may not be the inside of my phone saying that the phone had been damaged and was not covered by warranty. my phone has never been dropped and has been very well take care of. :-(

I have asked that they escalate my complaint and I'll be getting a call back tomorrow but I don't hold out too much hope. Not quite sure what too do after that but I wont stop there, considering the cost of the phone originally it's taking the p***

sounds shocking. Good luck mate and what country are you in?

I have just picked my phone up from an o2 store after sending it off for repair, the keys only worked intermittently (as previously posted) along with a few other issues. I received t.he handset back with a "Beyond Economical Repair" diagnosis, claiming that i had somehow bent and cracked the motherboard due to physical damage. I had to instead claim from o2 insurance costing me £25. I think in the future its much better to contact Sony Ericsson directly.

I'm in the UK and today had a call back from the escalations team who just confirmed what I was told yesterday, basically bent board, not our problem, buy a new one. They will send it back for free though which I'm supposed to be grateful for.
I'm now going to take it to their director of support, when you look at the 1000+ posts about the cracks and another 2 replies in this thread about the 'bent mainboard' the manufacture of this phone is questionable to say the least and goes a long way to prove the sale of goods act 'unfit for purpose' rule. I'm happy to take this to civil court if needs be........I'm a principals man and I'm seriously pi**ed...

Can you send it back to Sony? Sony repaired my damaged screen/cracked casing for free in about 7 days

i think it depends on country, in my they even charge me changin the case, becouse "they didnt get any input about cracks in case". i show them xda thread with numeros complaining and no luck, had to pay...

I recently sent the phone back to change the keyboard and upgrading of firmware. I had to wait 3 weeks for a keyboard cos they went out of stock for it.
They even changed my cover that had some scratches without even me asking. Also the D-pad was changed cos of some peeling.
I thought that they gave me a reburbished set so I checked the IMEI, its ok. They even offered me an extended warranty program where I pay around 70SGD and it covers even accessories like headphones and such for a one-to-one exchange scheme.
This is SE Singapore Support.

Problem with HTC Support (and the N1 phone) - Need advise

Has anyone been able to dispute a repair charge and does anyone know if there would be charges if the power button was not working?
I just want to share my story and am wondering if investing $400 of repair charges on top of a $530 phone is worth it.
4/7/10 - Purchased N1 (Compatible with 3G on AT&T U.S.) from Google Webstore.
6/7/10 - Begin having 3G data & phone signal loss in New Orleans. Contacted AT&T and was told they were having tower issues in the area. Spent one week using 2G instead.
6/13/10 - Went to AT&T store to check on service. Got a brand new SIM card that worked on another phone. At this point, carrier issue has been ruled out
6/14/10 - Phoned N1 support, performed a master reset and then got transferred to HTC for warranty support. It was either replacement or repair. Chose replacement option.
6/17/10 - Received replacement phone and shipped my original phone back to them the very next day.
6/23/10 - Received email for a $196(!) repair quotation. Phoned into HTC support and was told that it was a customer induced motherboard damage. I asked for more details on the damage & charge, and customer service said that they need information from the "warehouse" and get back to me. Never heard back from CS.
7/10/10 - New replacement phone shut off by itself and could not be powered back on.
7/11/10 - Called N1 support and performed master reset which did not work. Got transferred to HTC support but a case cannot be opened because the previous case was still outstanding. The customer serivce rep confirmed that the case notes stated that I had called for more information, and they were supposed to get back to me. I was told that I need to talk to a supervisor for further support and they do not work on weekends.
7/12/10 - Called HTC support and spoke to a supervisor. Basically she told me that my options are
my options are either to pay the $196 and close the case or wait up to 48 hours to get the details back from the "warehouse". Either way, no replacement can be processed until the previous case is closed. I was told that there is no way to:
1. Get the open case closed temporarily so a replacement for my current issue can be dealt with.
2. No other person beyond the supervisor(s) I can talk to.
3. No way to escalate to the wareshouse to speed up 48 hours needed on getting the previous repair details.
4. No one can do anything else for a customer who is going through an exception situation.
5. No clear instructions on how to dispute a repair quotation.
All customer service reps sounded pleasant but HTC has procedures that do not support customer satisfaction. Here are somethings that I find completely unsatisfying. Neither phones have been rooted, tempered with, dropped, or water damage on neither device.
1. First let's talk about 2 defective phones.
2. Sending repair quote to customers demanding payment without more information is unacceptable.
3. Blaming customer for self-induced damange while there is a known 3G issue for the N1.
4. Not getting back to customer on repair details is also unacceptable.
5. Not being able to open more than one case is absurd. In my situation, we're dealing with 2 different issues but for some reason, one is related to the other in the system.
6. Where is the repair charge dispute process documentation?
7. The is no exception to the "normal" escalation process is a huge gap. Basically I was told that after the supervisor level, it goes to the "warehouse". No one can talk to the wareshouse without going through the 48 hour escalation process.
8. Tell customer that damage maybe water related when the battery has no record of such.

You studiously do not deny self induced damage.did you break it? We're not here to play guessing games.
Sent from my Nexus One using XDA App

Hi
I faced a similar situation as you. My power button went wonky and I sent it in to HTC for servicing. It was a very tiring ordeal for me.
The HTC support (in Singapore) kept insisting that my motherboard needed a replacement and they wanted to charge me for it as I had an unlocked bootloader and was unable to claim warranty.
I kept arguing with their phone support that I just wanted my power button fixed and I was skeptical that that required a motherboard replacement. They kept insisting that I needed to replace my motherboard in order fix the power button.
As I was getting nowhere with phone support( I spent 3 days arguing with them) I made a trip down to their service center to try to speak to the engineer actually servicing my phone.
Had a similar argument with the CSO there who repeated the same BS to me and finally said she will go inside and have the engineer come out to explain further. So I waited. After several minutes (of which i believe she was informing him that there was an angry customer outside), she emerged alone and said they will wave the charges for the button repair.
Do you know what disgusts me the most about this entire ordeal?
When i finally received my phone back from them, they repaired my power button but my boot loader remained unlocked!
They did not need to replace my motherboard!
IMO, HTC simply wanted to replace the motherboard cos I had an unlocked bootloader. What better way to make easy money then to milk me with an unnecessary but expensive repair simply cos I voided my warranty. It' s unethical and personally, HTC has lost any future business from me.
It ironic as I bought my phone from Google.

caysman said:
You studiously do not deny self induced damage.did you break it? We're not here to play guessing games.
Sent from my Nexus One using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm putting my money on an unlocked bootloader

No I have not unlocked or rooted neither phones. My replacement N1 received the Froyo push. I did not even install it myself. Seriously there was no tempering, dropping, or water damage on neither device.
I would agree that HTC is passing repair charges to customers because it makes good business sense. It'll be highly unlikely that I am going to purchase another HTC phone.

TangBiz said:
All customer service reps sounded pleasant but HTC has procedures that do not support customer satisfaction.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Exactly my thought. I've had my phone repaired for almost a whole month now and I still have no hope of getting it back.
The customer service is nice but they are absolutely useless. Everything regarding the actual status of the phone has to be initiated by the escalation team or warehouse, and I highly doubt that they give a **** of the customers.

TangBiz said:
No I have not unlocked or rooted neither phones. My replacement N1 received the Froyo push. I did not even install it myself. Seriously there was no tempering, dropping, or water damage on neither device.
I would agree that HTC is passing repair charges to customers because it makes good business sense. It'll be highly unlikely that I am going to purchase another HTC phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Has this been resolved?
If you haven't unlocked the bootloader, then there's no reason to charge you for the repair. Definitely talk to a supervisor and don't be afraid to insist that the phone if fully covered under warranty and they need to replace the unit or repair it.

I guess HTC support is 50/50, i've read that many HTC sends over a new phone the next day i guess it depends on certain malfunctions they do that. You should find out on what malfucntions do they send phones right away, and claim that as the problem.

KidTech said:
I guess HTC support is 50/50, i've read that many HTC sends over a new phone the next day i guess it depends on certain malfunctions they do that. You should find out on what malfucntions do they send phones right away, and claim that as the problem.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm getting my rooted/unlocked phone repaired for free. So yeah, it really is 50/50!

My headphone jack started wigging out and thinking there was a headset plugged in when there wasn't. I also explained that I started to see dust coming in underneath the screen in the bottom left corner.
I opted for a replacement. I got it the next day. New one is great. Bootloader was unlocked and no charge was issued.
I would be livid. How old was the original phone with the "broken motherboard"? April? Well all hardware defects are covered up to 1 year. If the phone casing shows no physical signs of abuse yet the motherboard is broken... then that is a ringer that it is a manufacture defect.... especially if you'd had the phone for 2 months.
If there are no signs of physical damage and the water sticker is clean then you have full entitlement to your warranty. This includes motherboard replacements.

Does anyone have the Nexus One Warranty term in pdf or could scan for me?

apparently, google has pulled the pdf in regards to the warranty term but i need it for insurance claim... however, it was not found anywhere... does anyone happen to save a copy when it was available? Thanks much for the help!
here is the original URL... http://www.google.com/googlephone/nexusone-warranty.pdf
and a part of the warranty terms...
Nexus One Warranty Information
Returns and warranty: Warranty
How long does the warranty cover the phone?
Your warranty coverage depends on where you live:
European Union: the warranty coverage extends twenty-four (24) months from the date of original purchase.
All other locations (including the United States): the warranty coverage extends twelve (12) months from the date of original purchase
What kind of things are NOT covered by the warranty?
The warranty does not cover physical damage to the surface of your Nexus One, including but not limited to cracks or scratches on the screen or camera lens. The warranty also does not provide coverage for issues related to third-party applications you've installed. What kind of things can void the warranty coverage?
Here are a few examples of actions that void the warranty coverage:
rough handling of the device
exposure of the device to extreme conditions
tampering with the device, including removal or defacing of the serial number, IMEI number, or water indicator
unauthorized opening or repair of the device
tampering with or short-circuiting the battery
unlocking the bootloader using the fastboot program
For a complete list, refer to the warranty card included with your Nexus One and also available below. How does the warranty process work?
HTC offers two options for the warranty process:
Device swap: The device swap is the quickest way to get a working phone again. A new device will be sent to you, together with a box for returning the defective device. You should remove the SIM card, the battery, and the microSD card from the defective phone, insert them into the new device, and return the defective phone in the box provided.
If you have engraved your phone with a personal message, the device that you receive will not include the engraving, and the engraving on the defective device will not be sent back to you. If you want to keep your engraving, you can opt for the express repair option.
Express repair: With this option, you send the defective device to the HTC service center. HTC will perform the repair and send you back your device, including the original engraving.
How can I initiate a warranty repair?
The first step is to request a ticket number by calling HTC, the number for which can be found in the Service & Repair section of the HTC website. An HTC representative will guide you through the process and either (a) arrange for the delivery of the swap device or (b) send you shipping instructions to an email address you provide (if you prefer the express repair model).
What happens if I send my device for warranty repair, and it turns out the defect is not covered by the warranty?
If the HTC service center detects that the device is not covered by the warranty, an HTC representative will contact you to determine what to do next. You can choose to pay for the repairs (the HTC representative will provide you a quote), or you can opt to have HTC send you back the device, in which case your credit card will be charged the round-trip shipping fees, as well as an examination fee of $28.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Is this the pdf you are looking for: tinyurl.com/8x65qmh
It looks like a generic HTC warranty, though.
Edit: XDA forums won't let me post a link yet (8 post rule...), so you'll have to copy paste that.

e.coli said:
Is this the pdf you are looking for: tinyurl.com/8x65qmh
It looks like a generic HTC warranty, though.
Edit: XDA forums won't let me post a link yet (8 post rule...), so you'll have to copy paste that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks a lot! that was very helpful!

Glad to be of help!

eMMC Class Action Lawsuit

I'm surprised this hasn't been posted yet, but didn't find it in a forum search. There is a class action lawsuit that has been filed regarding the Note 4 eMMC failure. Here's the link for more info and to inquire about your claim:
http://www.classlawdc.com/2017/04/25/investigation-samsung-galaxy-note-4-mmc_read-failed-defect/

I posted that in the eMMC Read Fail topic about a month ago but for sure it needs to be out in the open like this! Its good to note that at the moment its only being looked into by these Lawyers in the US. I contacted them but they said they were not working with anyone in Canada at the moment, So I'm SOL for this

I live in Canada as well and I have filed an official complaint with the BBB Better Business Bureau against Samsung Electronics Canada. If you are interested in following the same approach make sure you file a complaint not a review because you can't do both, and a complaint if accepted by the BBB is forwarded to Samsung Electronics Canada from the BBB on your behalf to seek a resolution. Samsung only after being contacted by the BBB is now trying to work out a resolution with me to fix my Note 4 but I have been asking Samsung at many different levels and occasions to do that with no success only being quoted "Out of Warranty Policy". At least now they are trying to resolve my problem. It shouldn't have taken this much time and frustration as it has since I have been without a working Note 4 since the day in mid May when an OTA android update issued from my carrier triggered an instant unrecoverable hardware malfunction in my phone. As well I also sent a note to CBC Marketplace informing them of a possible story concerning Note 4 owners having this problem and letting them know that there was a lawsuit launched in the US concerning the very same issue and wondering if they could help inform other Canadians and provide awareness of the issue so ALL Canadian Note 4 owners with problem-ed devices could be heard so loudly that Samsung Electronics Canada would listen. I encourage any other Canadian Note 4 owners to do the same. The Galaxy Note 4 when it was working was truly a remarkable device and it is sad that it died way too soon.

But this issue plagues the Note 2 as well. Though I reckon that model is a bit older. I wonder how long my phone will last, I already have random reboots and the sound sometimes stutters if I play music with Spotify (SM-n910c.) GPS can be also spotty from time to time.
Quality 700$+ phone.

Canada
Just sent in my BBB complaint as well to Sam Canada. Did you hear back from them? I was quoted a $400+ repair bill (which I declined). Frankly I’m not keen on finding a used eMMC/motherboard and repairing it myself, only to have the issue happen all over again.

how do i know if this will affect my Note 4? or does it affect all note 4? My phone was made and pruchased in 2017 so i still have warranty.

https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/22154208/BETURE_et_al_v_SAMSUNG_ELECTRONICS_AMERICA
class action lawsuit status

My N910F has unfortunately developed all the signs and symptoms of the widely reported of eMMC failure a couple of weeks ago. As it is still under Samsung's UK 2 year warranty, my faulty phone to be picked up and sent for inspection to one of their approved repair centres (A NOVO) . Subsequently, the phone back was sent back quickly to me unrepaired and with an attached (standard looking template) letter stating that your engineer has tested my device and found that it is not working because "it has been subjected to SEVERE physical damage internally" and that physical damage is not covered by the manufacturer's warranty.
As I am 100% satisfied that my phone is in pristine physical condition and has been very well looked after with 2 covering cases all the time as well as a screen protector and has never been subjected to drops, liquid exposure or any other physical damage, I have asked Samsung to send me the detailed engineer report as to the nature of the fault found. I am intending on getting an independent assessment of the phone and will aim to produce an independent report on the fault with a view on taking this further with trading standards or other consumer protection agencies. Samsung have been extremely evasive and very uncooperative and have asked me to contact the service centre directly to discuss the issue with their 'engineer'. I cannot in reality understand how this would help resolve my problem as their engineers will very likey just perpetuate the same lies that they had come up with previously in their letter to me.
I will try and get in touch with the service centre and see what they would come up with but I am not holding much hope and was looking to see if anyone who might have been in a similar position might have any suggestions as how to proceed with trying to get Samsung to take responsibility. Needles to say, no more Samsung for me in any way in the future.

lewis.james.750983 said:
https://www.pacermonitor.com/public/case/22154208/BETURE_et_al_v_SAMSUNG_ELECTRONICS_AMERICA
class action lawsuit status
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Status for dummies update? I can't find a place toto buy brand new motherboards anywhere and used ones are $50 with no guarantees if they're not going to have the same issue...all while I'm stuck using my slowass Note 2 and refuse to goto a 5 or higher since they don't have removable batteries.

Samsung keeps letting innocent customers down with its faulty hardware...
immabum said:
Just sent in my BBB complaint as well to Sam Canada. Did you hear back from them? I was quoted a $400+ repair bill (which I declined). Frankly I’m not keen on finding a used eMMC/motherboard and repairing it myself, only to have the issue happen all over again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I did eventually get an offer via email routed through the BBB from Samsung Canada and they offered a one-time out of warranty repair for my device. (Don't get too excited there's more to the story.) I repeatedly being very polite asked them to contact me directly by phone because I had some concerns about there offer and all I asked was for a phone conversation for the "Senior Computer Service for Canada Rep" to reassure me that my device would be repaired without cost to me but they would never even consider my request and simply reply back with an abrupt somewhat ignorant responses like I was asking for something like the moon. Long story short I had a slight sign of Liquid Damage on my devices LD sticker and I was being incredibly honest that this had occurred over a several month period having to chill my device in the freezer on a regular basis to get it to boot this caused condensation which was shown on one corner of the LD sticker. This would not have happened if Samsung Canada had offered the repair 4 months prior when I initially started having problems with the device. So through no fault of my own trying to use a failing product Samsung Canada found a way to WEASEL out by using my own jerry-rigged hardship with their faulty hardware against me. If I had sent my phone into an authorized repair center and they found LD on my phone I would have had to pay for shipping costs to and from the center as well as an assessment fee and my device would be held ransom until I paid up. Goodness knows how much that would have cost me. I will hang on to my busted device in case the class action in the US is won and might extend therefore into Canada. I could even sell my Note 4 on eBay for parts because everything else besides the motherboard is absolutely pristine.
Samsung Canada had a perfect chance to help a polite loyal customer but they chose not to. I have had the same sort of things happen with Apple products in the past and "Oh Boy" did they treat me differently, with dignity and respect and they went out of their way to help me but Samsung Canada did the exact opposite. I think this is done because they know its a genuine hardware defect and if they help their customers out it would be the same as admitting they are guilty of selling poorly designed products and then be on the hook a open up a large amount of liability for the company.
Either way though us poor customers who have been burned by this company will not simply lie down and be quiet the internet is a great place to expose companies when they screw up a product and leave customers hanging.
I hope someone else has better luck dealing with Samsung than I did. The strange thing is for a brief moment when they first said they would fix my device I actually thought they were going to come thru but the end result stung much more when they didn't. Samsung Canada you blew it!!!!!!

Aiadi said:
My N910F has unfortunately developed all the signs and symptoms of the widely reported of eMMC failure a couple of weeks ago. As it is still under Samsung's UK 2 year warranty, my faulty phone to be picked up and sent for inspection to one of their approved repair centres (A NOVO) . Subsequently, the phone back was sent back quickly to me unrepaired and with an attached (standard looking template) letter stating that your engineer has tested my device and found that it is not working because "it has been subjected to SEVERE physical damage internally" and that physical damage is not covered by the manufacturer's warranty.
As I am 100% satisfied that my phone is in pristine physical condition and has been very well looked after with 2 covering cases all the time as well as a screen protector and has never been subjected to drops, liquid exposure or any other physical damage, I have asked Samsung to send me the detailed engineer report as to the nature of the fault found. I am intending on getting an independent assessment of the phone and will aim to produce an independent report on the fault with a view on taking this further with trading standards or other consumer protection agencies. Samsung have been extremely evasive and very uncooperative and have asked me to contact the service centre directly to discuss the issue with their 'engineer'. I cannot in reality understand how this would help resolve my problem as their engineers will very likey just perpetuate the same lies that they had come up with previously in their letter to me.
I will try and get in touch with the service centre and see what they would come up with but I am not holding much hope and was looking to see if anyone who might have been in a similar position might have any suggestions as how to proceed with trying to get Samsung to take responsibility. Needles to say, no more Samsung for me in any way in the future.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
An update on my situation: After all the hassle that I have had from Samsung and their customer service, I contacted Amazon UK from whom I purchased the phone. They have very kindly offered to take my phone for repair through their approved repair centre which has managed to identify the fault with the printed circuit board and replaced the faulty circuit board with the phone returned to me today in full working order again and without any charges incurred by myself. Needless to say "Shamesung" offered no explanation as to how Amazon's repair centre has been able to do what their own engineers could not manage and could not explain the lies on their engineer's report about my phone being subjected to severe physical/liquid damage when Amazon's report clearly identified motherboard failure and replacement.
I cannot praise Amazon highly enough for the steps they have taken to solve my problem and although I am happy to have my phone back, I have decided not to purchase any other product manufactured by Shamesung whatsoever and will do my best to dissuade anyone I know from making the same mistake.

immabum said:
Just sent in my BBB complaint as well to Sam Canada. Did you hear back from them? I was quoted a $400+ repair bill (which I declined). Frankly I’m not keen on finding a used eMMC/motherboard and repairing it myself, only to have the issue happen all over again.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just wanted to comment, that it was a pain in the ass, but I did report through the BBB in Canada -and I got the repair done for free. In my complaint to the BBB, I mentioned the fact that it wasn't an isolated issue and made reference to the class action law suit in the US. Samsung asked for a lot of documentation, had my phone at one of their stores and refused to ship it to their service center. Then they cancelled the repair offer because of it sitting at THEIR own store, the one I paid a $35 shipping fee. Their customer service guy Robert emailed me saying that he would take care of it, but in the end didn't and stopped replying to my emails. I sent in my phone anyways seeing as it was a lemon. 3 months after this process was started, I finally got my phone back -fixed. I ended up giving it to my dad anyways *he had no ideas the pain I went through haha* Hope you guys get your repairs done for free as well!

Aiadi
Good you got it sorted. I just became aware of this problem, so I'll keep an eye on it.
It's worth for UK members to keep in mind the "Fit for purpose clause" that is still valid if the device is out of warranty. An extract below:
"Six months or more
If a fault develops after the first six months, the burden is on you to prove that the product was faulty at the time of delivery.
In practice, this may require some form of expert report, opinion or evidence of similar problems across the product range.
Find out more about how to return a faulty item and claim a refund, repair or replacement from a retailer.
You have six years to take a claim to the small claims court for faulty goods in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, and five years in Scotland.
This doesn't mean that a product has to last six years - just that you have this length of time in which to make a claim if a retailer refuses to repair or replace a faulty product. "
https://www.which.co.uk/consumer-rights/regulation/consumer-rights-act
Sent from my [device_name] using XDA-Developers Legacy app

Wadadli said:
Aiadi
Good you got it sorted. I just became aware of this problem, so I'll keep an eye on it.
It's worth for UK members to keep in mind the "Fit for purpose clause" that is still valid if the device is out of warranty. An extract below:
"Six months or more
If a fault develops after the first six months, the burden is on you to prove that the product was faulty at the time of delivery.
In practice, this may require some form of expert report, opinion or evidence of similar problems across the product range.
Find out more about how to return a faulty item and claim a refund, repair or replacement from a retailer.
You have six years to take a claim to the small claims court for faulty goods in England, Wales and Northern Ireland, and five years in Scotland.
This doesn't mean that a product has to last six years - just that you have this length of time in which to make a claim if a retailer refuses to repair or replace a faulty product. "
https://www.which.co.uk/consumer-rights/regulation/consumer-rights-act
Sent from my [device_name] using XDA-Developers Legacy app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Many thanks indeed Wadadli. I know there is quite a bit of customer protection but the difficulty was to establish what the fault was with the phone with the situation being "my word against Samsung's". I hope no one else falls into this.

wkustu said:
I'm surprised this hasn't been posted yet, but didn't find it in a forum search. There is a class action lawsuit that has been filed regarding the Note 4 eMMC failure. Here's the link for more info and to inquire about your claim:
http://www.classlawdc.com/2017/04/25/investigation-samsung-galaxy-note-4-mmc_read-failed-defect/
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I contacted this Law Firm mentioning I am having same issue and they asked me if I can submit the details using below form. You can add this to thread if anyone else wants to contact them.
https://forms.office.com/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx?id=M1Awu4pX0ky56HfvNeJmB2eE_TkEyrJIjTBCKPN74zBUOEdNSVRDNkhXRFpTNzBRTTNMWkM5SUtNMi4u
---------- Post added at 03:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:55 PM ----------
My AT&T Note 4 first failed in Jan 2017 after Security Patch OTA update and I started getting eMMC Read Failed errors, frequent reboots etc. I contacted Samsung but they gave the same warranty BS. After several back on forth on twitter they agreed to have a look at it for free and provide quote with repair. I sent in the device and I never got contacted by them and device was returned to me after a weeks time with a letter showing screen issue and replacement charge of $70. I raised this with them saying I never got call and again they asked me to send the device back and this was repeated two more times. Fourth time I called them and they agreed to repair it for free. I also sent email to Samsung President Office (did receive call back from them). This time they replaced PBA, Scratched screen and body. Finally I have my Note 4 working without any issues but I lost about an year. Glad I had a backup device.

Vaibhavpbhosale said:
I contacted this Law Firm mentioning I am having same issue and they asked me if I can submit the details using below form. You can add this to thread if anyone else wants to contact them.
https://forms.office.com/Pages/ResponsePage.aspx?id=M1Awu4pX0ky56HfvNeJmB2eE_TkEyrJIjTBCKPN74zBUOEdNSVRDNkhXRFpTNzBRTTNMWkM5SUtNMi4u
---------- Post added at 03:21 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:55 PM ----------
My AT&T Note 4 first failed in Jan 2017 after Security Patch OTA update and I started getting eMMC Read Failed errors, frequent reboots etc. I contacted Samsung but they gave the same warranty BS. After several back on forth on twitter they agreed to have a look at it for free and provide quote with repair. I sent in the device and I never got contacted by them and device was returned to me after a weeks time with a letter showing screen issue and replacement charge of $70. I raised this with them saying I never got call and again they asked me to send the device back and this was repeated two more times. Fourth time I called them and they agreed to repair it for free. I also sent email to Samsung President Office (did receive call back from them). This time they replaced PBA, Scratched screen and body. Finally I have my Note 4 working without any issues but I lost about an year. Glad I had a backup device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Care to share Samsung CEO's email with us as I would like to email them a piece of my mind?

Sure here u go Officeofpresident (at) sea dot samsung dot com

Vaibhavpbhosale said:
Sure here u go Officeofpresident (at) sea dot samsung dot com
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Many thanks indeed. Email sent.....

Aiadi said:
Many thanks indeed. Email sent.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any answer?
Enviado desde mi SM-T580 mediante Tapatalk

Qualcomm s805 so hot when run, easy die nand like lg g4. Exynos version is better.

eMMC Failure.... What to do next?

My N910F has unfortunately developed all the signs and symptoms of the widely reported of eMMC failure a couple of weeks ago. As it is still under Samsung's UK 2 year warranty, my faulty phone to be picked up and sent for inspection to one of their approved repair centres (A NOVO) . Subsequently, the phone back was sent back quickly to me unrepaired and with an attached (standard looking template) letter stating that your engineer has tested my device and found that it is not working because "it has been subjected to SEVERE physical damage internally" and that physical damage is not covered by the manufacturer's warranty.
As I am 100% satisfied that my phone is in pristine physical condition and has been very well looked after with 2 covering cases all the time as well as a screen protector and has never been subjected to drops, liquid exposure or any other physical damage, I have asked Samsung to send me the detailed engineer report as to the nature of the fault found. I am intending on getting an independent assessment of the phone and will aim to produce an independent report on the fault with a view on taking this further with trading standards or other consumer protection agencies. Samsung have been extremely evasive and very uncooperative and have asked me to contact the service centre directly to discuss the issue with their 'engineer'. I cannot in reality understand how this would help resolve my problem as their engineers will very likey just perpetuate the same lies that they had come up with previously in their letter to me.
I will try and get in touch with the service centre and see what they would come up with but I am not holding much hope and was looking to see if anyone who might have been in a similar position might have any suggestions as how to proceed with trying to get Samsung to take responsibility. Needles to say, no more Samsung for me in any way in the future.

there's a dedicated thread on this, no? why open another one??

Thread closed.
In the interest of keeping this topic in one place, please post any information or questions here