Hello All,
So I have been checking the change logs for both the Carbon and CM10.1 ROM for improvements for the touchscreen issues. I know verygreen is working diligently to get this issue resolved. I am unaware of does the Carbon ROM by killersloth have the touchscreen issues as well or only CM 10.1 ROM by verygreen?
I do not want to flash either ROM until I know the touchscreen sensitivity is the same as stock rom because I will be flashing whichever ROM on my mother's tablet and she will have a fit if there is any problems.
I know things like this take time, I just want to know about the Carbon rom.
Thanks,
TAB
I have had some of those issues. I don't think they have been reported too much in the CarbonRom thread though. I do believe that killersloth has incorporated Verygreen's fix into the Rom. I've only had issues using a web browser and that didn't happen too much. I don't remember it happening in the current rom, but I've only been running it for a day.
Sent from my KFTT using Tapatalk 2
dmullens said:
I have had some of those issues. I don't think they have been reported too much in the CarbonRom thread though. I do believe that killersloth has incorporated Verygreen's fix into the Rom. I've only had issues using a web browser and that didn't happen too much. I don't remember it happening in the current rom, but I've only been running it for a day.
Sent from my KFTT using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So just so I understand you have ran multiple versions of the Carbon ROM but the latest build (7/7) you are not experiencing any more touchscreen issues?
theamazingbeat said:
So just so I understand you have ran multiple versions of the Carbon ROM but the latest build (7/7) you are not experiencing any more touchscreen issues?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been running Carbon since B1. I'm using the latest build and I have not _noticed_ any issues. For me the issue was intermittent, so I can't tell you that you won't have issues, or that there aren't any issues, just that I have not noticed them.
Related
Hi to all,
some days ago I flashed my I9001 from Stock Rom 2.3.6 to CM9 rc4 with Kernel 3.0.62.
Now I have some issues with spontaneously reboots or mobile goes off. Do you encounter same problems? What can I do? Thanks for your help guys.
one2web said:
Hi to all,
some days ago I flashed my I9001 from Stock Rom 2.3.6 to CM9 rc4 with Kernel 3.0.62.
Now I have some issues with spontaneously reboots or mobile goes off. Do you encounter same problems? What can I do? Thanks for your help guys.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you over clocked played with Theda kernel settings
sent from my 4.2.2 i9000
kevtrysmoddin said:
Have you over clocked played with Theda kernel settings
sent from my 4.2.2 i9000
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no i haven't done anything.
one2web said:
no i haven't done anything.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It sounds like an unstable system have you tried another ROM with full wipes?
It may be your best option
sent from my 4.2.2 i9000
kevtrysmoddin said:
It sounds like an unstable system have you tried another ROM with full wipes?
It may be your best option
sent from my 4.2.2 i9000
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
of course I did a full wipe.
CM9 rc3 seems to be stable although wifi connection seems to be a bit weak.
Will flash again CM9rc4 these days to exclude the flashing was maybe improper.
one2web said:
of course I did a full wipe.
CM9 rc3 seems to be stable although wifi connection seems to be a bit weak.
Will flash again CM9rc4 these days to exclude the flashing was maybe improper.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have u tried jellybean yet?
Sent from my GT-I9000 using XDA Premium HD app
I had the same problem.
However, Doomsday provided a modified and updated kernel some days ago. I've been using that one for a while and I don't remember having many problems since. This is the post http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=37952778&postcount=3555 Hope it helps!
Also, MIsterLemons has just released an updated kernel based on arco's sources which you can find here http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=38059967&postcount=3575, I haven't tested that one (I rather like doomsday's additions) but his kernel might just fix your issues as well without diverging from arco's builds.
EDIT: it appears I had been lucky. I've just had 2 random shutdowns in 5 minutes using Doomsday's kernel...
Any help would be greatly appreciated.Hello all thank you for you time. I'm running cm10.1 unofficial nightly build 05.22.13 on my touchpad with the latest adobe flash apk and Firefox app from Googleplay.
The issue that I'm having is my display would go to sleep as configure per my display setting while I'm streaming flash content at full screen. Not sure why this is happening and not sure if this is just my device. I didn't have this issue with cm9. Only notice this with cm10 and now 10.1. Theodd thing is that this issue is also happening with my nook color and nexus 7 with cm10.1
My current work around is setting display to time out 30 mins and touch the display every now and then.
Any help would be greatly appreciated
Thanks again
I did a quick search and found this app for you. I haven't tried it, but its worth a try.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=it.android.keepscreenon
nickster1 said:
I did a quick search and found this app for you. I haven't tried it, but its worth a try.
Thank you. I went back to cm9 for stability but will keep this app in the back pocket . I was just curious to know if I was the only one experiencing this flash problem or its the same for everyone else. If its just me I wonder wat I did wrong with the install
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
imanobe said:
nickster1 said:
I did a quick search and found this app for you. I haven't tried it, but its worth a try.
Thank you. I went back to cm9 for stability but will keep this app in the back pocket . I was just curious to know if I was the only one experiencing this flash problem or its the same for everyone else. If its just me I wonder wat I did wrong with the install
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Flash is being phased out and anything past 4.1 either doesnt work or partially works.
Sent from my TouchPad using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
gradular said:
imanobe said:
Flash is being phased out and anything past 4.1 either doesnt work or partially works.
Sent from my TouchPad using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Flash is phased out but that doesn't mean you can't get it to work well. Its working great for me on my phone and tablet. Both running 4.2.2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
nickster1 said:
gradular said:
Flash is phased out but that doesn't mean you can't get it to work well. Its working great for me on my phone and tablet. Both running 4.2.2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I,ve been flasing custom roms since the touchpad and nook color was out so i'm curious to know what I did wrong with these installs. I've had this issue happened to me with multiple devices. Nexus 7 nook color and my touchpad . All install were done with complete wipe of device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
imanobe said:
nickster1 said:
I did a quick search and found this app for you. I haven't tried it, but its worth a try.
Thank you. I went back to cm9 for stability but will keep this app in the back pocket . I was just curious to know if I was the only one experiencing this flash problem or its the same for everyone else. If its just me I wonder wat I did wrong with the install
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Flash has never worked well on 4.1+ ROMs on the Touchpad in my experience. Flash isn't supported on 4.1+ but on other devices its still smooth so its a Touchpad Android issue not a Flash issue.
If you want Flash stay with CM9. I went back to CM9 after being on CM10 a while because I wanted stable Flash and couldn't really think of any new CM10 features that I needed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
spunker88 said:
imanobe said:
Flash has never worked well on 4.1+ ROMs on the Touchpad in my experience. Flash isn't supported on 4.1+ but on other devices its still smooth so its a Touchpad Android issue not a Flash issue.
If you want Flash stay with CM9. I went back to CM9 after being on CM10 a while because I wanted stable Flash and couldn't really think of any new CM10 features that I needed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First and foremost thank you for your input. It is true that flash is no longer supported on 4.1 + but it can and should be stable once installed. One example I can provide is with my nexus seven. With stock rom and latest flash APk installed it runs Smoth no problem but when it is rooted and custom rom installed display issue occurs. There must be some config in the rom where display would remain awake when certain apps are running at full screen. Also its hard to see that its a touch pad issue because this is happening to other devices that I've installed custom 4.1+ rom. I'm currently back with cm9. For stability until cm 10.1 is more stable will switch.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
imanobe said:
spunker88 said:
First and foremost thank you for your input. It is true that flash is no longer supported on 4.1 + but it can and should be stable once installed. One example I can provide is with my nexus seven. With stock rom and latest flash APk installed it runs Smoth no problem but when it is rooted and custom rom installed display issue occurs. There must be some config in the rom where display would remain awake when certain apps are running at full screen. Also its hard to see that its a touch pad issue because this is happening to other devices that I've installed custom 4.1+ rom. I'm currently back with cm9. For stability until cm 10.1 is more stable will switch.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Samsung probably built in some code to be more flash-compitable.
Sent from my TouchPad using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Flash runs smooth on my Droid3 with CM10.1 even though the rom is far from stable. Also runs well on the Razr with stock 4.1.2 update. Its just on the Touchpad that 4.1+ have issues with flash in my experience.
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using Tapatalk HD
Hi everyone,
I recently installed android on my friend's Touch Pad. Which ROM do you recommend as the most stable/usable ROM? (While being new and hopefully rather current as - like Android 4.1 or 4.2). My friend is definitely not familiar with flashing or anything like that, but she knows how to use android. As I will be moving out of the state at the end of this week, I want to leave her with a good ROM that will be nice and stable and easy for her to use. What do you all suggest? Thanks!
Tough one just have to flash them all and test I would go for cm10 night lies because they'll constantly update it and all you have to do is go into settings and update it.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda app-developers app
[email protected] said:
Tough one just have to flash them all and test I would go for cm10 night lies because they'll constantly update it and all you have to do is go into settings and update it.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, I'm trying a couple. I had a 4.2.2 mashup of CM, AOKP, and PA. It was a bit buggy, and probably too confusing for my friend. She does really like the PIE controls though so I'm trying to get a stable one with those. If not I'll just go for the CM10 nightlies probably. Thank you sir!
for me, the most stable roms are the standard CM9 nightlies.
they benchmark higher than any of the 4.2.2 builds, and has working bluetooth and no UI issues as noted on the CM10 and CM10.1 builds.
every few weeks I backup my HP touchpad and install some of the latest roms and always come back to CM9. it just works better, and best of all, it has a better UI (while the tablet UI mod helps with CM10 and 10.1, it does not fix all of the issues. and for CM10.1 there is no 120dpi so you are stuck with everything being oversized for the screen
while with cm9 all you need is the CWM flashable 120dpi patch which still works with the latest nightly builds and takes care of any market place issues.
Overall for everyday use, CM9 is still the way to go.
I attached the 120dpi patch that I use. It only works on CM9
screenshot of 120DPI http://i.imgur.com/qnJ1BKM.jpg
dag1337 said:
Hi everyone,
I recently installed android on my friend's Touch Pad. Which ROM do you recommend as the most stable/usable ROM? (While being new and hopefully rather current as - like Android 4.1 or 4.2). My friend is definitely not familiar with flashing or anything like that, but she knows how to use android. As I will be moving out of the state at the end of this week, I want to leave her with a good ROM that will be nice and stable and easy for her to use. What do you all suggest? Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've used both CM9 & CM10 and found them to be very stable.
I downloaded. And installed the LCD density trick. Fonts are too small for me. How can I undo it?
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using Tapatalk 2
ccheung said:
I downloaded. And installed the LCD density trick. Fonts are too small for me. How can I undo it?
Sent from my cm_tenderloin using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you are on CM10 and the 120dpi is too small, to undo it flash the 160dpi file
the CWM dpi patches are the only ones that have worked for me, I have tried android 4.1 and 4.2 and the only recommendations for adjusting the dpi is using apps from the market place and all of the recommended ones for me have not worked, most causes the rom to not boot fully.
The main thing holding me back from going to anything higher than CM9, is the lack of stable bluetooth support, the new android 4.1+ UI that is just a more screen space wasting version of the cellphone UI (not tablet optimized at all), and the issue with no 120DPI mod working with it.
Have been using CM9 for a long time with no complaints other than battery life. I think there may be some kernels that are better, but I like when the battery runs out and my kids have to put it down. A timer of sorts. I have not found a combination that can compare to WebOS for battery life. But, Android has all the latest stuff now for the kids, so, Android it is. I still use WebOS, though, when I can.
CM10.1 nightlies by milaq have been very stable for me. I experienced random crashing of the default browser in CM9 nightlies but none in CM10.1.
Obviously the missing Bluetooth in CM10.1 may be an issue for some but I haven't really used BT for anything.
Iipe said:
CM10.1 nightlies by milaq have been very stable for me. I experienced random crashing of the default browser in CM9 nightlies but none in CM10.1.
Obviously the missing Bluetooth in CM10.1 may be an issue for some but I haven't really used BT for anything.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I forgot to mention that no more random reboots for me with CM10.1. They were daily with CM9.
Try milaq's new cm10.2 nigtly! It's even more stable and faster!
Zippo2000 said:
Try milaq's new cm10.2 nigtly! It's even more stable and faster!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i beg to differ. I would go with shumash 4.2.2. ROM
I am currently running ancient cm10.1 20130604 nightly for last several months. I tried to upgrade a few times to 4.3 but had stability issues and went back to this ROM, which is more stable than others though power loss in sleep is still a concern along with BT.
Any recommendation on a more stable ROM? The Kitkat build looks juicy but my kid uses this tablet mainly and he gets upset if the battery dies too quickly or the system crashes
Thanks for any comments.
By the way, any way to see the partition sizes? I think I increased the system partition to 512MB before installing 4.3 but don't remember now.
Found Partition in Play store. Worked like a charm. I only have 393MB in /system and /data 3527MB. I guess going back to 10.1 restored the partition table as well.
I'd say just grab the latest version of 10.1 (2014-01-13). There's not too much of an advantage for 10.2 or 11. The cm11 3.0 kernel version is also close, but things like mic and camera are still broken.
scy1192 said:
I'd say just grab the latest version of 10.1 (2014-01-13). There's not too much of an advantage for 10.2 or 11. The cm11 3.0 kernel version is also close, but things like mic and camera are still broken.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is bluetooth suppost to be working in that version? I can't seem to get it to turn on...
Update from CM9
Hi @scy1192,
I'm using CM 9 should i format to update to CM10.1 or just a flash?
Does the battery lasts long compared to CM 9?
Prasanna_bng said:
Hi @scy1192,
I'm using CM 9 should i format to update to CM10.1 or just a flash?
Does the battery lasts long compared to CM 9?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'd say flash it and if you have any problems, do a factory reset. No use getting rid of all your data if it's not harming anything, but then again there might be some odd thing that breaks when upgrading.
As for battery, I personally found it better on CM10.1 than CM9.
Thanks
scy1192 said:
I'd say flash it and if you have any problems, do a factory reset. No use getting rid of all your data if it's not harming anything, but then again there might be some odd thing that breaks when upgrading.
As for battery, I personally found it better on CM10.1 than CM9.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks scy1192. I'll try it tonight.
I'm using cm11 by milaq. Its very stable and I use it as my work tablet
Sent from my TouchPad using xda app-developers app
How do you think 10.1's battery life? The wifi can wake up by itself after sleep? (it cannot in CM9)
frostysnowman said:
I'm using cm11 by milaq. Its very stable and I use it as my work tablet
Sent from my TouchPad using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Using Flintmans nondata cm11, runs fine but BT support isn't complete yet, keyboards work though
rexian said:
I am currently running ancient cm10.1 20130604 nightly for last several months. I tried to upgrade a few times to 4.3 but had stability issues and went back to this ROM, which is more stable than others though power loss in sleep is still a concern along with BT.
Any recommendation on a more stable ROM? The Kitkat build looks juicy but my kid uses this tablet mainly and he gets upset if the battery dies too quickly or the system crashes
Thanks for any comments.
By the way, any way to see the partition sizes? I think I increased the system partition to 512MB before installing 4.3 but don't remember now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am using http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2450358, no problems for me
stable rom
HI
I'm using CM11 Milaq and its very stable. There's still some things that aren't working. Like camera,Netflix version 3.x..etc. Buts its a very stable build. The best build I ever had installed that was really stable and ever thing worked, was evervolv CM10.2. This ROM was really good and stable I don't remember ever having any problems with it at all.
Hello,
I´ve been thinking about that: Which one is better: Ressurection or NightOwn? And why?
I did a try and both seems like same! (same bugs, same layout - material design, etc...)
Maybe LL Roms could make custom roms a little bit hard to do core/visual changes, or it is just a my mistake?
You should try it first , then you can compare which is better ! Btw i prefer using nightowl for battery life [emoji106]
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
mtmello said:
Hello,
I´ve been thinking about that: Which one is better: Ressurection or NightOwn? And why?
I did a try and both seems like same! (same bugs, same layout - material design, etc...)
Maybe LL Roms could make custom roms a little bit hard to do core/visual changes, or it is just a my mistake?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the same confusion! What bugs did you face?
They have similar issues. In latest versions there are proximity sensor issues during call, also users complain about 1080p recording not working, overheating, battery drain, etc. All bugs and solutions are in the original threads. You guys should try both of them and compare. It all depends of what you expect. Both are beta versions so bugs are expected. I have used both and I like Bauner's version a bit more, for no specific reason. I had to return to more stable rom, because I'm currently using N7000 as main phone and I need it to be stable as much is possible.
i tried both and smilar. but nightowl better battery life and smoothness. but you must try and see which one.
super_operater said:
I had to return to more stable rom, because I'm currently using N7000 as main phone and I need it to be stable as much is possible.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
/OT What rom did you return to? Tx
backstreetboy said:
/OT What rom did you return to? Tx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Currently I'm on SlimKat (4.4.4), after using NightOwl beta 9.0.1. Still facing some bugs on Lollipop roms and I find this one quite stable for now.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using XDA Free mobile app
I sugest you go and get lanchon's kernel with the trimfix and the FP bug fix, it's the only truly stable kernel avaliable for the n7000.
Aldo, it supots trim, that helps a lot with the phone's responsiveness
blackomegatm said:
I sugest you go and get lanchon's kernel with the trimfix and the FP bug fix, it's the only truly stable kernel avaliable for the n7000.
Aldo, it supots trim, that helps a lot with the phone's responsiveness
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I used B9.0.1 from the beginning no one reboot yet.. very stable, good battery drain.
I was try NightOwl 12.1 beta2, a little lag, now i flash Ressurection with Nightowl 12.1 kernel and gapps in nightowl 12.1 now my note running smooth, i will test battery life!
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk