Database Develop

Protecting new Devs

Its not the first time I have seen devs run off xda-developers the worst by a cross social networking and xda organised campaign. Though recently I have seen a new developer who without help managed to download freely provided source by arco and build a ROM. Now this dev did not distribute this ROM and did not claim any credit for the 'source' but gave full credit and explained where he got it from. The resulting flaming resulted in that dev leaving after making a grand total of only 3 posts. Its about time moderators protected these devs from contrived flaming.

macsbac said:
Its not the first time I have seen devs run off xda-developers the worst by a cross social networking and xda organised campaign. Though recently I have seen a new developer who without help managed to download freely provided source by arco and build a ROM. Now this dev did not distribute this ROM and did not claim any credit for the 'source' but gave full credit and explained where he got it from. The resulting flaming resulted in that dev leaving after making a grand total of only 3 posts. Its about time moderators protected these devs from contrived flaming.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree, I'm glad your with me on this one

Team Canjica - a team of members (not devs) who develop for Galaxy S Advance I9070

I sent an e-mail to team dealing XDA Portal for pointing why our beloved members of the Team Canjica its not already RD.
Waiting for an answer and I'll post it soon will.
This is what i write to :
Subject:
Team Canjica - a team of members (not devs) who develop for Galaxy S Advance I9070
Body:
Why there is no article about Canjica Team, the team that develops from long time ROMs for our phones Galaxy S Advance GT I9070 , or other phones who have novathor chipset like Codina, Janice, Hudson and others?
I think it is a great injustice that team members to disclose sources on github (https://github.com/TeamCanjica) and other users, like Maclaw (actually New Maclaw), who is banned one time, receive laurels, especially considering the fact that not disclose the sources and the remaining activity as it should be in Open Source projects.
Please take this into consideration so that team members are on the threshold of giving up, because of injustice, software development and the fact that you not even consider to be promoted to the stage RD (Recognized Developer).
Regards,
Razvan
Proud Senior Member of XDA community
PS: Waiting for a reply to this post whatever will be.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Let's send PM's to moderators and / or administrators to see/receive an official response from them.

I was thinking of doing the same actually. I'll send each of the forum moderators a mail.
Even if they shoot our requests down, at least they'll know what is going on.
---------- Post added at 06:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:01 PM ----------
I was thinking of doing the same actually. I'll send each of the forum moderators a mail.
Even if they shoot our requests down, at least they'll know what is going on.

I was wondering... This refusal of rd status sounds pretty ridiculous to me. After all the whole team canjica has done a great deal for our device, right? So what could be the reason to deny them the rd status? Maybe they're short on resources and can't afford to give all these privileges to all the members of the team? Maybe that's why they put so much stress on individual work?
Such a blunt "no" has to hide something behind. If we could understand what that is maybe we could find at the very least a compromise of sort. Like a rd account shared by the whole team, maybe?
Just asking.
Sent. That's it.

arkadeep94 said:
I was thinking of doing the same actually. I'll send each of the forum moderators a mail.
Even if they shoot our requests down, at least they'll know what is going on.
---------- Post added at 06:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:01 PM ----------
I was thinking of doing the same actually. I'll send each of the forum moderators a mail.
Even if they shoot our requests down, at least they'll know what is going on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Send it to one, not all mods, otherwise it may seem like you're spamming.. And RAZVAN great mail but I suggest you remove the "not devs" part from the thread name because they are as "dev" as any other RD in this forum. We want XDA to know they ARE devs who are not getting the credit and facilities they deserve to contribute better
Sent from my GT-I9070 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app

ManiacShri said:
... And RAZVAN great mail but I suggest you remove the "not devs" part from the thread name because they are as "dev" as any other RD in this forum...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Of course they are devs, OUR DEVS, but they are not recognized by the XDA like developers.

R_a_z_v_a_n said:
I sent an e-mail to team dealing XDA Portal for pointing why our beloved members of the Team Canjica its not already RD.
Waiting for an answer and I'll post it soon will.
This is what i write to :
Let's send PM's to moderators and / or administrators to see/receive an official response from them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
Users must apply to become a Recognized Developer through filling in the RD Application Form available here >>> http://www.xda-developers.com/recognized-developer-program/. These applications are then processed by the Developer Committee who use this portal post of minimum requirements for being an RD as the assessment criteria.

arkadeep94 said:
I was thinking of doing the same actually. I'll send each of the forum moderators a mail.
Even if they shoot our requests down, at least they'll know what is going on.
---------- Post added at 06:03 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:01 PM ----------
I was thinking of doing the same actually. I'll send each of the forum moderators a mail.
Even if they shoot our requests down, at least they'll know what is going on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No you won't. If I or any of the other forum moderators get our inboxes spammed the user responsible for this will be dealt with accordingly. If you must e-mail someone, only email 1 of us, not all of us. Though to be honest my above post says all you need to know.

ygtenos said:
I was wondering... This refusal of rd status sounds pretty ridiculous to me. After all the whole team canjica has done a great deal for our device, right? So what could be the reason to deny them the rd status? Maybe they're short on resources and can't afford to give all these privileges to all the members of the team? Maybe that's why they put so much stress on individual work?
Such a blunt "no" has to hide something behind. If we could understand what that is maybe we could find at the very least a compromise of sort. Like a rd account shared by the whole team, maybe?
Just asking.
Sent. That's it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
The minimum requirements for being a Recognized Developer can be found here >>> http://www.xda-developers.com/recognized-developer-program/rd-minimum-requirements/. If a user does not meet the high standards we have come to expect from RD's then the Developer Committee will not grant them the RD status.
And whilst you can have a team account, team account's will not be granted RD status as the RD program is to recognize individuals for their work.

Even Mr.Harsh Should be given some credit...He is the one who brought Dual boot to sgsa..
When Dual boot was brought in galaxy s , it was displayed in the portal

I think that is enough to know. For the momment.
I reported this thread, and Jonny responded immediately to my request and made known the way to go to become a recognized developer.
Thanks Jonny!

R_a_z_v_a_n said:
I sent an e-mail to team dealing XDA Portal for pointing why our beloved members of the Team Canjica its not already RD.
Waiting for an answer and I'll post it soon will.
This is what i write to :
Let's send PM's to moderators and / or administrators to see/receive an official response from them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why send a complaint about a person for RD status to the portal team??? They have absolute zip to do with the applications for RD. You are wasting your time.
Any no, it is not for users to go about PM'ing or e-mailing anyone and everyone trying to get a user RD status, that is for ONLY the user involved and the Developer Committee. Please stop this frankly ridiculous behavior and let the user involved contact the DC account.

Jonny said:
Why send a complaint about a person for RD status to the portal team??? They have absolute zip to do with the applications for RD. You are wasting your time.
Any no, it is not for users to go about PM'ing or e-mailing anyone and everyone trying to get a user RD status, that is for ONLY the user involved and the Developer Committee. Please stop this frankly ridiculous behavior and let the user involved contact the DC account.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh please ,
There is more in it then RD title , DC committee or anyone of the admin who is happy to solve the issues we have . Name them instead of replying like a automated messages.
Don't jump into conclusions so fast ,try to know more about it .
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk

Also 1 last point before this thread gets put to sleep.
With reference to the Maclaw part of the PM, I've noticed a lot of invalid reports going through the RP system about Maclaw over the last few days so let me clear up a few of the points that seem to be getting mis-interpreted.
1. They do not have to provide the ROM source. CyanogenMod and other AOSP ROM's are Open-Sourced under the Apache 2.0 License which states source code does not have to be published. It is the developers choice whether or not to publish ROM source.
2. The only thing that for which the source code needs to be published for is the Linux kernel as this is under the GNU General Public License (GPL) v2.
3. I'm well aware of the entire history behind Maclaw - I was the moderator who dealt with it last time around so please, no more RP's detailing the history of Maclaw
Thread closed.

percy_g2 said:
Oh please ,
There is more in it then RD title , DC committee or anyone of the admin who is happy to solve the issues we have . Name them instead of replying like a automated messages.
Don't jump into conclusions so fast ,try to know more about it .
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
True, however, it is the Developer Committee alone that deals with RD applications, rejections and complaints regarding this. No other usergroup interferes as a matter of principle - not even the admins. The DC are fully capable of handling these sorts of things as there are developers from all major platforms that form the DC.
Ok, I'm closing this thread. If you have anymore concerns about this then feel free to drop me a PM.

Need the help for the main developer of CM for L90 (Quarx)

Hello our friends abroad.
Just sorry for my english.
Used Google translator.​
To confirm the veracity of this post, you can ask about this very Quarx​
To develop a new Сyanogenmod based on Android M it is necessary to collect a certain amount to the acquisition for LG L90 developer.
We consider the purchase of a new device, but in any case it is necessary to talk about the amount of not less than 10 000 rubles.
The development will be engaged Quarx, author CM 11-12.1. Continue to update the CM is also possible, but the conditions were not discussed.
The device will remain in Quarx as payment for development. Start developing - off the release date of a new version of the CM.
As the author would be pleased at the expense of financial support for his work and the constant support of 12.1
For more information about CM: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/CyanogenMod​**** Purse out on the development of CM ****
Regarding http://vk.com/wall-67828971_73142
Payment can be made at:
Yandex money
- "410012810651169"
Qiwi
- "+380991580348"
At this time that was collected:
Total: 5 458.58 rub.
Left to collect: 4 541.42 rub.
Links to our developer "Quarx2k", which is engaged in the development and support of 11-12.1 cm at the moment.
Quarx
Quarx2k site where you can see his work.
http://quarx2k.ru/
Payment to:
Truhan Kirill Sergeyevich
In comments to the payment be sure to specify your login on 4pda or XDA and the comment "tax on the phone!" Also, please write me in private message the amount, that you transfered, and i will post it on 4pda and here. The country should know its heroes.
respkirya (4PDA)
respkirya (XDA)
If you do not find yourself in this list, but made the payment - please contact http://vk.com/ukrainian_drift
All reports will be kept here http://vk.com/topic-67828971_32404538
P.S. The author of this post respkirya, I'm just posted, because i have amount of posted messages to create thread.

How about you let Quarx handle his own affairs?

toastgodsupreme said:
How about you let Quarx handle his own affairs?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are you talking about?

So, no reaction? This is the crowdfunding some of you were asking to create

..

..

Can you share only the front flash fix please and also the link that you share is not working thanks in advance

Delete

Download link not working enlace de descarga no funciona revisa por favor.

Delete

this fix was not you that did, and you were not allowed to use it. the real developer name is @Bode327
@MikeChannon

gabrielunm said:
Add IT in xlm file of camera.
system/cameradate/camera-feacture-v8.xml
Or use IT magisk module
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1YYGa2S2UlcQekO6JZSLq9XScBH4W1KDQ/view?usp=drivesdk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Man, you did not solve any problem, you are using third party material to gain advantage, In your YouTube video where you explain downgrade from oreo to nougat. the script and the rom that you are using are mine, because the error 11 I left on purpose. Be a man and take or give credit to devs.

[email protected] said:
this fix was not you that did, and you were not allowed to use it. the real developer name is @Bode327
@MikeChannon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's true who did was Bode327.

First of all, the MAGISK module that you have published as your own was created by me, according to the rules, to be able to promote and use, you should have given credits and thanks to me!

Whois the Developer for Rom Optimized Oreo V6 for J7p?

Mod Edit
May I remind everyone of the XDA RULES
12. Sharing
XDA-Developers is based on the principle of sharing to transmit knowledge. This is the cornerstone of our site. Our members and developers freely share their experience, knowledge, and finished works with the rest of the community to promote growth within the developer community, and to encourage those still learning to become better. There are those, however, who take advantage of this model and try to make personal gains from the hard work of others.
In order to preserve the delicate balance between sharing for the good of the community and blatant self-promotion, regular members and developers alike must understand (and agree) to the following:
12.1. Give credits where due - Credits and acknowledgements for using and releasing work which is based on someone else's work are an absolute must. Works reported to have no credits will be taken down until proper acknowledgements are added by the member in question;
12.2. Courtesy - While most of the work released on our site falls under the umbrella of open source, that is not the only license model being used by developers on xda-developers. In order to prevent problems, we ask that if you decide to base your work on someone else's that you check the license model being used (as it might not be as permissive as one may think);
12.3. Re-releasing other's works as your own is forbidden. The code that you release into the wild must have something beyond minor aesthetic changes that makes it better than the last. As this can be subjective, kang reports will be reviewed on a case by case basis. If you feel that your code has been kanged, please contact the Dev Relations team (listed below) if you cannot solve the issue amicably via PM. Please understand that you will be asked to provide evidence to substantiate your claim;
12.4. Developers can issue take down requests (by contacting the Dev Relations team) under the following circumstances:
- in-process builds start showing up on forums when the developer is not yet ready to release the work;
- cases in which another developer is too aggressively soliciting donations or misrepresenting the work (kanging);
- unofficial builds where an official build is already available;
In summary, we want people to have access to work and knowledge alike. Sharing is good and courtesy and ethics go a long way.
Developers with questions, comments, complaints, or concerns about our rules (or anything!) should send a PM to our Dev Relations team (efrant or sykopompos) or to a Moderator. We are here to help!
Please read these carefully.
malybru
Senior Moderator

NiCaARRecho said:
Whois the Developer for Rom Optimized Oreo V6 for J7p?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes
Sent from my on7xelte using XDA Labs

HI

I work as a publisher to post exclusive things for free​If I have an apple and you have an apple, we both have one apple, and if I give you my apple and you give me yours, we each have an apple and nothing changes But if I had an idea and you had an idea and I gave you my idea and I took your idea from you, then each of us has two ideas. This is the rule by which I live.​

Greetings and welcome to XDA. Please take a moment to review the Forum Rules. XDA thrives on the sharing of ideas; however, we must be respectful of each others' work. Therefore, I would like to point out some specific items:
12.1. Give credits where due - Credits and acknowledgements for using and releasing work which is based on someone else's work are an absolute must. Works reported to have no credits will be taken down until proper acknowledgements are added by the member in question;
12.2. Courtesy - While most of the work released on our site falls under the umbrella of open source, that is not the only license model being used by developers on xda-developers. In order to prevent problems, we ask that if you decide to base your work on someone else's that you check the license model being used (as it might not be as permissive as one may think);
12.3. Re-releasing other's works as your own is forbidden. The code that you release into the wild must have something beyond minor aesthetic changes that makes it better than the last. As this can be subjective, kang reports will be reviewed on a case by case basis. If you feel that your code has been kanged, please contact the Dev Relations team (listed below) if you cannot solve the issue amicably via PM. Please understand that you will be asked to provide evidence to substantiate your claim;
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As a rule of thumb, it's always good form to ask permission before you use someone else's idea or work. If you take my idea without asking, I'm not going to be particularly happy about it, even if you gave me one of yours.
Additionally, please review the XDA GPL Policy. Compliance with all forum rules and policies is mandatory and non-negotiable.