I'm currently using CM9 RC1 and I notice that there is a slight 1-1.5 second lag from the time I hit the power or home button to when the screen actually wakes up. I think I had this problem on stock as well.
I have an LG Optimus One and pressing either hardware buttons instantly turns on the screen. Is this a hardware issue or can it be fixed? It's not terribly annoying but I'd prefer it to be more responsive.
coolxal said:
I'm currently using CM9 RC1 and I notice that there is a slight 1-1.5 second lag from the time I hit the power or home button to when the screen actually wakes up. I think I had this problem on stock as well.
I have an LG Optimus One and pressing either hardware buttons instantly turns on the screen. Is this a hardware issue or can it be fixed? It's not terribly annoying but I'd prefer it to be more responsive.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since ICS Stunner Rom is using the CM9 Kernel I have the same feeling that the phone needs more time to wake up.
+1 same here
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Well if it's software related then I hope it gets updated soon.
coolxal said:
Well if it's software related then I hope it gets updated soon.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The wakeup lag has plagued Samsung phones. My SGS2 had it and so does my Note irrespective of rom or kernel. Samsung seems to think that it is acceptable. It annoys the hell out of me and if I wasn't so impressed with all the other aspects of my phone I'd jump ship to HTC. When will Samsung learn that the wakeup lag is not acceptable???
And before someone chimes in about deep sleep, think about this. Other brands obviously deep sleep and they don't have the lag. This is a Samsung issue that needs to be recognized and acknowledged by them and then fixed. Even their flagship S3 has it FFS.
coolxal said:
I'm currently using CM9 RC1 and I notice that there is a slight 1-1.5 second lag from the time I hit the power or home button to when the screen actually wakes up. I think I had this problem on stock as well.
I have an LG Optimus One and pressing either hardware buttons instantly turns on the screen. Is this a hardware issue or can it be fixed? It's not terribly annoying but I'd prefer it to be more responsive.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wrong Forum ?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1683
sahilarora2003 said:
Wrong Forum ?
http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=1683
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The OP is in the correct forum. You either didn't read or didn't understand his post. He has a Note that has wakeup lag like the rest of us, and he has an LG that has no wakeup lag.
Well that's seems to be an ics issue.. Galaxy nexus had it on stock but with a custom kernel oc able you could just set interactive governor with 512-720 mhz speed on the lower speed and lag was gone..
I recall this because nexus has pure aosp non samsung software at all
But this issue its fixed on jelly bean so the nexus with stock rom/kernel with no changes at all won't lag on wakeup
Maybe other oems sets their stock kernels with the lower clock a bit higher than 320 to avoid this at some battery cost..
Just my 2 cents
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
msedek said:
Well that's seems to be an ics issue.. Galaxy nexus had it on stock but with a custom kernel oc able you could just set interactive governor with 512-720 mhz speed on the lower speed and lag was gone..
I recall this because nexus has pure aosp non samsung software at all
But this issue its fixed on jelly bean so the nexus with stock rom/kernel with no changes at all won't lag on wakeup
Maybe other oems sets their stock kernels with the lower clock a bit higher than 320 to avoid this at some battery cost..
Just my 2 cents
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not an ICS issue because both my Galaxy S2 and my Galaxy Note had the problem on Gingerbread. I can't see how the lower clock speed can help because the phone is clocking a lot less than the lowest clock when asleep. The only time I've seen no lag on the S2 or Note is when the phone doesn't actually go into deep sleep. This can be confirmed with CPU Spy.
I've read that the Nexus doesn't have the lag with Jellybean. My last great hope for my Note is that Jellybean will fix the wakeup lag, but I won't believe it till I see it.
My S3 LTE comes with Jellybean but the lag is still there. AARRggghh!
Does anyone know when the next software update for the 4X will avail?
Features I think should be added:
Better battery consumption
Quick Voice
Notification LED for back light buttons
Made possible by my sexy LG Optimus 4X HD(aka P880)
theofficialpimp said:
Better battery consumption
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
current technology do not offer better batteries at all, so wishing that is like hoping we can advance the hardware, without new technology.
your best and current way of seeing a better battery life is using a OC app, and turn down top speed on all cpu's. and thats how LG sell you improved lifetime on batteries, and you hardly notice. secondly undervolt it and use a different governor too.
Seems there is new V10E for Benelux, Czech and Germany. Folks on Russian forums have successfully applied this update, but so far no info about any significant changes.
These updates are available at lg-phone-firmware.com/index.php?id_mod=15
theofficialpimp said:
Does anyone know when the next software update for the 4X will avail?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do use an OC app but just to set the min to 860. I don't want to change the max because overall this is a 1.5GHz phone and that's the main reason I bought it. I kinda see a improvement in bat life.
22% down in 1 hour use
Made possible by my sexy LG Optimus 4X HD(aka P880)
Having sold my Galaxy S3 and bought one of these there are two really annoying things,
1- You can't organize your app tray into alphabetical
2- They have removed the inbuilt battery % function.
I know I can use custom launchers, but I shouldn't have to and any advice on a decent app for battery % or maybe I am missing something
You mean percentage on battery icon?
You must tick Battery percentage in Power saver settings
smair82 said:
2- They have removed the inbuilt battery % function.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
@ndrius said:
You mean percentage on battery icon?
You must tick Battery percentage in Power saver settings
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fantastic thanks for that it confused me because it's normally under the display setting. now how to organize the app tray
theofficialpimp said:
Does anyone know when the next software update for the 4X will avail?
Features I think should be added:
Better battery consumption
Quick Voice
Notification LED for back light buttons
Made possible by my sexy LG Optimus 4X HD(aka P880)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use the app NoLed for notifications, it's a great tool
https://play.google.com/store/apps/...lt#?t=W251bGwsMSwyLDEsImNvbS5sZWQubm90aWZ5Il0.
Actually do use Touch LED notifications app but it drains battery cause its always running in the backgrounds and it's a third party app which I don't like
Made possible by my sexy LG Optimus 4X HD(aka P880)
According Russian forums so far known these changes in V10E:
you can turn off shutter sound in camera;
new sound for alarm clock;
new icon for stock browser;
improved overall and in games performance;
probably less RAM usage.
@ndrius said:
Seems there is new V10E for Benelux, Czech and Germany. Folks on Russian forums have successfully applied this update, but so far no info about any significant changes.
These updates are available at lg-phone-firmware.com/index.php?id_mod=15
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Seems this is only for T-Mobile branded devices? So i'd suppose this only "improves" the branding.
@ndrius said:
According Russian forums so far known these changes in V10E:
you can turn off shutter sound in camera;
new sound for alarm clock;
new icon for stock browser;
improved overall and in games performance;
probably less RAM usage.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In v10c (Indonesia) already have option to turn off shutter sound.
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
Did the V10E update, can confirm that the tegra 3 games run smoother. Seems like the phone is abit fast also.
zerovision said:
Did the V10E update, can confirm that the tegra 3 games run smoother. Seems like the phone is abit fast also.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
what country?
Yup, shutter can be off on 10b in Singapore.
Sent from my LG-P880
All Europe will get V10e update next month.
darryd said:
what country?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Netherlands
How bout US? I bought mine from Europe though
Made possible by my sexy LG Optimus 4X HD(aka P880)
be aware that updating the terminal to v10e you lose the root and the previous guide it does not work. personally tested.
theofficialpimp said:
How bout US? I bought mine from Europe though
Made possible by my sexy LG Optimus 4X HD(aka P880)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
All Done:good:
:fingers-crossed:
Please suggest a way to maximize battery life while sacrificing performance(not too much of course).
I tried out various roms, one is problemish over another.
Kernels as well.
I'm on my 3rd full charge on my 3rd day of phone purchase so the battery should have regulated a little.
I tried AOSP by cile and the experience is great but not the battery, overnight 7 hours I dropped 27% of battery.
(greenify on + underclock to 1000mhz + pm.sleep_mode = 1)
Do recommend me a combo best for battery life.
(one needs a stable platform to stand on before moving on to development right?)
Ararargi CM 20130707 + Iodak v6 Kernel.
Trickstermod: CPU Quiet: Userspace
Max CPU Clock:760Mhz
Min CPU Clock: 102Mhz
Scheudler: SIO
FSYNC: Disable
Intelligence Dimmer: Enable
Fast Charge: OFF
Multi Prozessor Engery Saving: Disable
Here my Under volt Values:
The charge insane Fast. In 10 Min 10-15%.
The Phone drain is 1% pro 3Min (less us)
2 % pro 3Min (heavy use)
LG 4X HD - Better than a Smartphone
KiD3991 said:
Please suggest a way to maximize battery life while sacrificing performance(not too much of course).
I tried out various roms, one is problemish over another.
Kernels as well.
I'm on my 3rd full charge on my 3rd day of phone purchase so the battery should have regulated a little.
I tried AOSP by cile and the experience is great but not the battery, overnight 7 hours I dropped 27% of battery.
(greenify on + underclock to 1000mhz + pm.sleep_mode = 1)
Do recommend me a combo best for battery life.
(one needs a stable platform to stand on before moving on to development right?)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Cm 10.1 and eternitys kernel, underclocked to 1,3ghz. Really good performance and battery, i do recommend using nova launcher to, because cms stock trebuchet launcher is kinda laggy
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
Nemeziz 56th said:
Ararargi CM 20130707 + Iodak v6 Kernel.
Trickstermod: CPU Quiet: Userspace
Max CPU Clock:760Mhz
Min CPU Clock: 102Mhz
Scheudler: SIO
FSYNC: Disable
Intelligence Dimmer: Enable
Fast Charge: OFF
Multi Prozessor Engery Saving: Disable
Here my Under volt Values:
The charge insane Fast. In 10 Min 10-15%.
The Phone drain is 1% pro 3Min (less us)
2 % pro 3Min (heavy use)
LG 4X HD - Better than a Smartphone
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
jonteftw1 said:
Cm 10.1 and eternitys kernel, underclocked to 1,3ghz. Really good performance and battery, i do recommend using nova launcher to, because cms stock trebuchet launcher is kinda laggy
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks you two.
I will test both out and compare! Then will report the best out of which.
I use SuperXE ROM with iodakv6 - heavily undervolted using TricksterMod.
Governor: Interactive
IO Scheduler: SIO or ROW
stock rom and iodak kernel. Using systemcleanup I converted maps, weather, lg keyboard etc to user apps and then greenify almost everything. Also a little undervolting and I see great battery life and performance.
Hi guys!! I was thinking about opening a thread where everyone can specify what's the better kernel setup, according to her/his own necessities, and share that configuration with all p880 community. Also, it can be submitted the relationship between the kernel and the ROM an user is running on the device, to compare performances and make each other more conscious about kernel tweaking. I think it's better to open it in general section, so everyone can write, without being scared by submitting something not related to developing.
This thread won't to be in any way a substitute of the "Battery life!" thread, so if anyone wants to post specifical results or screenshots about battery duration, please post them here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2478514
Said that, the idea is to post a message like this:
KERNEL: name of the kernel you are using
ROM: the name of the ROM you are running
SETTINGS: the kind of settings you applied to your kernel (example: Governor=interactive, Scheduler=Sio, Multicore Power Saving=2,CPUquiet=balanced, LP Core uV=-15 mV, MPU uC=+20, and so on)
GOOD: the benefits you experienced with your configuration (the more specific possible)
BAD: the badness you experienced with your configuration
Of course, if the thread begins to grow up, is recommended to read everything before posting a configuration too much similar to another which have been posted yet.
If you think this is a good idea, press thanks, if you want, and let's begin posting, otherwise report it to moderators, like @laufersteppenwolf, and they will close this thread as soon as possible
If someone like @JoinTheRealms is interested to, I'd appreciate very much to create a section dedicated to the scripts, as a second post of the thread, maintained and refreshed by the author.. Let me know, and take your own space here, if you think it's good for you!
So, I'm starting posting my own last configurations:
1)
KERNEL: iodak v9.95
ROM: Beanstalk 4.4.2
SETTINGS: Governor=interactive, Scheduler=Sio, CPU max speed undercloked to 1300 Mhz, CPU max screen off frequency=370 Mhz, Multicore Power Saving=1 ,CPUquiet=balanced, LP Core uV=-30 mV all frequencies, MPU uV=-75 mV all frequencies
GOOD: this configuration improve battery life, without decreasing overall smoothness - suggested to the users who don't mainly use the phone for hard gaming and want to find a compromise between battery durability and overall performance
BAD: some little lags, here and there, randomly happen - I suggest to apply underclock, before changing cpu freq voltage, because this configuration is good for 1300 Mhz undercloked device, but it may cause system freezes on some cpu variants, if you set cpu clock up to 1600-1700 Mhz (tested)
2)
KERNEL: iodak v10
ROM: Beanstalk 4.4.4
SETTINGS: Governor=interactive, Scheduler=Sio, CPU max speed undercloked to 1300 Mhz, CPU max screen off frequency=620 Mhz, Multicore Power Saving=1 ,CPUquiet=balanced, LP Core uV=-100 mV all frequencies, MPU uV=-100 mV all frequencies
This configuration is very battery friendly, more than the last one I was using on iodak v9.95. Nothing is slowing down, btw
@JoinTheRealms reserve a post to yourself, if you liked my idea to dedicate some space to scripts explaining
Sent from my LG-P880 - Beanstalk 4.4.2 - Iodak 9.95 kernel - using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Saved!
Lol, I'm using almost the same config.
Kernel: Iodak 9.9.5
Rom: Beanstalk 4.4.2
Settings: I haven't changed anything
Good: Very fluid and stable
Bad: battery life, Antutu 3D test score
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
Kernel: 9.95
Rom: CM11 official
Settings: Max Frequency 1150 Mhz Cpu governor:interactive
mpu undervolt -100 on every freq (cpu variant 2, some hangs while waking the smartphone and I need to tap on the screen sometimes, if I press the power button the device won't wake up anymore until I restart it).
Congestion: westwood
Cpu quiet: runnable
Cpu max screen off freq: 475 Mhz
Good: less heat, more battery life, smooth experience
Bad: If I put 1300 Mhz as max freq the battery life will decrease.. And without 1300 Mhz as max freq I feel like cutting this smartphone's cpu potential.
Still bad battery life even with these tweaks, still disappointed, but so far this is my best configuration with Cm11 official.
peppethustra said:
@JoinTheRealms reserve a post to yourself, if you liked my idea to dedicate some space to scripts explaining
Sent from my LG-P880 - Beanstalk 4.4.2 - Iodak 9.95 kernel - using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The scripts i posted earlier, really shouldn't be take too seriously, mainly because they are written for ubuntu and require input. But when i get some time ill modify my post and give some examples of init.d scripts, or more specifically, the commands inside them. That should be somewhat more helpful i guess
JoinTheRealms said:
The scripts i posted earlier, really shouldn't be take too seriously, mainly because they are written for ubuntu and require input. But when i get some time ill modify my post and give some examples of init.d scripts, or more specifically, the commands inside them. That should be somewhat more helpful i guess
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Take the time you need, the thread seems beginning to live, so we'll read your post for sure, when you will bring it to evolution!
Sent from my LG-P880 - Beanstalk 4.4.2 - Iodak 9.95 kernel - using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Kernel: Optimus Play v2.53
Rom: CM11 official
Settings: Max frequency 1200 Mhz (sometimes I tried to put it at 1100 Mhz or even lower, 1000 Mhz, resulting in better battery life)
Congestion: cubic (since there's no westwood implementation in this kernel)
Cpu quiet: not implemented (I think it's put on runnable or balanced as standard)
Cpu governor: interactive
Multi-core battery saving: 1
Gpu frequency scaling: on
Good: awesome perfomances, the games and all the apps are very smooth and compared to the earlier configuration with iodak v9.95, this is very much better, but be aware that I'm trying to have perfomances and battery life balanced, and on iodak v9.95 I undervolted the cpu of -100mv resulting in some cases of hangs and crashes. Battery life is still good, but a bit worse than the iodak configuration.
Bad: Battery life's not very good, it goes harder on deep sleep when the display's off, iodak v9.95 is the best with deep sleep; in fact it takes a while before entering that state, it usually stays on low frequencies but it still consumes the battery.
An other aspect I noticed is that even when the smartphone is on charge, when I'm using it, it doesn't charge much, if ever it looses energy, which is explained by the very good performances of this kernel.
A small bug present in this kernel, and not in iodak, you usually need to double press the power button to wake the smartphone, but it's much better than risking to have your smartphone crashed while waking it up.
Overall: A very good kernel for performances, I don't know if it's the best but it's very good, battery life's "good" if not using the smartphone, otherwise it drains quite fast, I think faster than the undervolted configuration with iodak.
If you're looking for smoothness with games and apps I'd suggest this kernel, if you prefer battery life I'd suggest iodak more, but I remind you the hang problems on it if you decide to undervolt up to -100mv.
I tested both kernels with the same Rom and apps and use more or less, so I'm quite positive it's a good test.
I hope it helps and you can give us tips or suggestions to improve this smartphone's battery life, without losing perfomance. I think this is the thread's goal.
and yeah, every LG Optimus 4x hd possessor's dream is to have a good battery life so well, let's help each other and get the best out from this device, it's not **** yet in my opinion, it just really has a bad battery usage.
@KrisJoe Very good review! I hope many people will follow your example..comparing user's kernel usage and customizations is the better way to help everyone to find the needed configuration, and to let them make whatever they want, with their phone, on the best possible way
Sent from my LG-P880 - Beanstalk 4.4.2 - Iodak 9.95 kernel - using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I just noticed something going back at iodak v9.95 to try peppe's configuration; on iodak v9.95 the temperature of the cpu is higher, there's a difference of at least 20° C more or less. Problem was that I went back to iodak because charging with optimus play v2.53 was a pain since instead of charging it wasn't. (Of course I mean while in use)
With iodak charging is flawless (I activated the fast charge option, which isn't present in Optimus Play).
Is it because of the fast charging option that's making the difference?
I'n trying the cpu undervolted by -75mv MPU and -30mv LPU, and it seems a bit laggier than the optimus play one, I can feel the difference just typing with the keyboard on the browser, but it's charging despite me using the smartphone.
What do you think it's the cause of the slow charge in optimus? And maybe more important thing, how is it possible that the cpu has a 20° C of difference between optimus and iodak but I keep the same frequency? I even undervolted with iodak, and in theory it should be the opposite situation, with iodak having lower temperature.
KrisJoe said:
I just noticed something going back at iodak v9.95 to try peppe's configuration; on iodak v9.95 the temperature of the cpu is higher, there's a difference of at least 20° C more or less. Problem was that I went back to iodak because charging with optimus play v2.53 was a pain since instead of charging it wasn't. (Of course I mean while in use)
With iodak charging is flawless (I activated the fast charge option, which isn't present in Optimus Play).
Is it because of the fast charging option that's making the difference?
I'n trying the cpu undervolted by -75mv MPU and -30mv LPU, and it seems a bit laggier than the optimus play one, I can feel the difference just typing with the keyboard on the browser, but it's charging despite me using the smartphone.
What do you think it's the cause of the slow charge in optimus? And maybe more important thing, how is it possible that the cpu has a 20° C of difference between optimus and iodak but I keep the same frequency? I even undervolted with iodak, and in theory it should be the opposite situation, with iodak having lower temperature.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So, talking about charging, on iodak's kernel you have to consider two situations: if you are charging through USB port, you may experiment slow charging and battery consumption even while charging, if you use the phone in the meanwhile (so, using fast charge solves the problem, but it is recommended to do not use it too many often, if you want your battery to have a longer life)..the problem doesn't exist if you charge the phone through AC adapter, so the phone should charge at a normal speed, even if you use it, whit no fast charge necessity.
Talking about my configuration, yes, you may have some little lags, here and there, 'cause this is a battery saving configuration, more than a gaming performance one..
Finally, temperature: maybe the difference between the kernels is due to a different overall cpu voltage, or the temperature is not really precisely shown, honestly I don' t know for sure
Sent from my LG-P880 - Beanstalk 4.4.2 - Iodak 9.95 kernel - using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I'm using the ac adapter and with optimus play charging was a bit hard and slower than with iodak. With -75mv it seems I don't have problems with waking up the smartphone and it seems a bit smoother, maybe a placebo effect, but I think that it could be the limit of undervolting with variant 2 cpus.
Now that I didn't use the smartphone for while the temperature is lower (49-51° C), the high temperature was due to the 1500 Mhz used at the beginning because I deleted cache and dalvik before installing iodak again (to avoid problems). Let's see how it behaves in these days, but I'm a bit confident iodak's config is better for battery saving, even though with antutu benchmark I did 13000 with iodak and, and 12800 with optimus play (with battery saving and performance balanced). It may be a wrong test but I still wanted to give it a try.
Yep, I tried to uV MPU frequencies at -100 mV, and it freezed my phone, after some seconds or minutes..so, I also think CPU variant 0x2 has this uV limit..maybe it's possible to uV a bit more single frequencies, without causing freezes, but I had not the time to try to individually uV any single frequency
Sent from my ME301T - Beanstalk 4.4.2 - Geass Kernel - using xda app-developers app
I was thinking that we should specify what runtime we're using, if Dalvik or ART because I actually felt some differencies. What about you? Do you feel any difference with using one or an other? Sorry for the off topic, but I thought we could talk about the runtime also since we'll looking for the best performance/battery life.
O.T.: Don't activate ART Runtime on the latest cm nightly (3rd of April 2014), it will force close some apps like uicall, dialer, ecc. I had to return to dalvik by installing an older version in which ART was working... quite unconvenient.
This is the best thread ever guys.
I am using iodak 9.95 in Zaiben RC8.
Max 1000 mzh, interactive, no undervolting, Multi core savings 2
The only bad thing is that if i want to wake a the device it doesn't wakes for the first time and I have to press twice the power button.
KrisJoe said:
I was thinking that we should specify what runtime we're using, if Dalvik or ART because I actually felt some differencies. What about you? Do you feel any difference with using one or an other? Sorry for the off topic, but I thought we could talk about the runtime also since we'll looking for the best performance/battery life.
O.T.: Don't activate ART Runtime on the latest cm nightly (3rd of April 2014), it will force close some apps like uicall, dialer, ecc. I had to return to dalvik by installing an older version in which ART was working... quite unconvenient.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, everyone is free to talk about ART or Dalvik, of course, it's related to Rom customization, using or not using it! Personally, I'm not using ART, considering it's on an early, experimental stage, and I have no time to switch between the two runtimes, if something should go wrong with ART (I need this phone as my really daily driver, and I haven't too much time to experiment, ATM).. But every single accurate review, also explaining how runtimes work, with a specifical kernel and a specifical Rom, is appreciated here!
Sent from my LG-P880 - Beanstalk 4.4.2 - Iodak 9.95 kernel - using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
XxXDarknessXxX said:
This is the best thread ever guys.
I am using iodak 9.95 in Zaiben RC8.
Max 1000 mzh, interactive, no undervolting, Multi core savings 2
The only bad thing is that if i want to wake a the device it doesn't wakes for the first time and I have to press twice the power button.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try multicore powersaving=1, and a little undervolt, you should have benefits in terms of smoothness, without losing battery
Sent from my LG-P880 - Beanstalk 4.4.2 - Iodak 9.95 kernel - using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
KERNEL: Iodak 9.5 (I know 9.95 is newest but I prefer 9.5 as I think it's performance/battery ratio is better.)
ROM: CM 03/30 nightly
SETTINGS(variant1): CPU max: 1500 lowest freq.: 620 screen off max: 475. GPU freq max: 564 mhz
MPU undervolted by -122 mV and LP core undervolted by -10mV but lowest freq. voltage is on default and max freq is on 1230 mV due to 564 mhz GPU freq. ART enabled and Multicore powersaving is set to 2.
GOOD: A lot smoother than 9.95 and with these undervolting I've done, it can survive heavy gaming without throttling.I can say this setup is the best for gaming if you've got variant 1.
BAD: Battery life is a bit worse compared to stock kernel.But with ART enabled it's difficult to notice the difference.Plus if you underclock to 1300 mhz your phone will still be smooth while giving you better battery life.
ottomanhero said:
KERNEL: Iodak 9.5 (I know 9.95 is newest but I prefer 9.5 as I think it's performance/battery ratio is better.)
ROM: CM 03/30 nightly
SETTINGS(variant1): CPU max: 1500 lowest freq.: 620 screen off max: 475. GPU freq max: 564 mhz
MPU undervolted by -122 mV and LP core undervolted by -10mV but lowest freq. voltage is on default and max freq is on 1230 mV due to 564 mhz GPU freq. ART enabled and Multicore powersaving is set to 2.
GOOD: A lot smoother than 9.95 and with these undervolting I've done, it can survive heavy gaming without throttling.I can say this setup is the best for gaming if you've got variant 1.
BAD: Battery life is a bit worse compared to stock kernel.But with ART enabled it's difficult to notice the difference.Plus if you underclock to 1300 mhz your phone will still be smooth while giving you better battery life.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have double press to wake bug with iodak 9.5 how did you solve it ?
CrazyWinner said:
I have double press to wake bug with iodak 9.5 how did you solve it ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I use volume rocker to wake the phone up as a workaround.Easy to reach it with your midfinger once you have the phone in your hand.Plus you get to press the power button less, extending it's life.
Edit : Incase you didn't know official CM and most of the custom ROMs have volume rocker wake option in settings > button or under some other category.