Seems that kholk is the only developer who pushed out a 3.4 kernel, while everybody else tends to stick with 3.1.
Just out of curiosity, is there a reason why we aren't using his 3.4 kernel? Bugs and major issues perhaps?
csfrank271 said:
Seems that kholk is the only developer who pushed out a 3.4 kernel, while everybody else tends to stick with 3.1.
Just out of curiosity, is there a reason why we aren't using his 3.4 kernel? Bugs and major issues perhaps?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
go read what kernel is , what is does, how it works and then read the features per version and u will understand why.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Linux_kernel
if there isnt any big difference then there is no reason to go to that version.
kholk abandoned development of eprj due to the amount of bugs and instabilty with 3.4...
The only big difference in kernel development would happen if they released source for tegra code
Rudjgaard said:
kholk abandoned development of eprj due to the amount of bugs and instabilty with 3.4...
The only big difference in kernel development would happen if they released source for tegra code
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i haven't heard those news. he abandoned HOX development, our device is still on his "to-dev" list
Yeah poor hox, if you take a look on their general and q/a sections you'll only find : devs stop support for hox and no kitkat tht
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
---------- Post added at 09:06 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:06 PM ----------
*threads, so i wanna thank all devs for 4x hd out there.
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
Related
I've managed to compile an over clock kernel based on the Galaxy S3's overclock code.
I'm working on ironing out the bugs and will post the kernel and source then but for now here are some antutu benchmarks.
Are you sure you edited the code correctly? 1728MHz and only 7400 antutu seems a bit low to me.
I thought stock score was already around 7100 or so
Sent from my LT26i using xda app-developers app
Yeah stock is 7100. That's the other screen shot. I'm looking at the code. I think some of the voltages are a bit wrong which is why I haven't released the code or kernel yet.
tilal6991 said:
Yeah stock is 7100. That's the other screen shot. I'm looking at the code. I think some of the voltages are a bit wrong which is why I haven't released the code or kernel yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh ok I haven't looked at the code yet, but I'm going to release an overclock kernel too
Sent from my ASUS Transformer Pad TF300T using xda app-developers app
Looking forward to this
trojan92 said:
Looking forward to this
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1 Me too
Hi,
I've closed the thread as placeholders are not allowed in any development forums and to save from lots of "I can't wait" and "+1" posts. Please PM myself or one of the other mods when you're ready to release your kernel and we will re-open the thread. Alternatively if you wish this to be a discussion thread then we can move it to the General section for discussion to continue.
Thanks
AvRS
So, after the shipwreck of Galaxy S4, when we can expect a 4.2.2 Samsung Base custom ROM with all features of the new S4 from our beloved developers??
yes please .. i have the jb 4.1.2 on my G note but after taking a look the jb 4.2.2 it is awesome ...
We are waiting
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda app-developers app
gam3r20 said:
We are waiting
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same here, waiting for the Boom news
---------- Post added at 03:54 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:37 PM ----------
gam3r20 said:
We are waiting
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
same here, waiting for the Boom news
Is this a Joke. Waiting for What. :silly: You guys need to straighten up a little. We just received 4.1.2 not even a month or so. You guys want 4.2.2. Don't be so Jealous. Nobody (Samsung) will come here and answer you here. So stop posting such obligations. If you are very much interested try 4.2.2 from development thread based on CM10.1, AOSPA and AOKP. Now dont ask what they are just search in google.
Cheers and have fun
Galaxtus said:
Is this a Joke. Waiting for What. :silly: You guys need to straighten up a little. We just received 4.1.2 not even a month or so. You guys want 4.2.2. Don't be so Jealous. Nobody (Samsung) will come here and answer you here. So stop posting such obligations. If you are very much interested try 4.2.2 from development thread based on CM10.1, AOSPA and AOKP. Now dont ask what they are just search in google.
Cheers and have fun
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
4.1.2 Samsung Base Custom Roms had released much earlier than the official (when S3 arrived). That's why i start this topic... I have try this ROMS and they are very cool. But the Samsung Base ROM is something other...
dewadgKernel Features
dewadgKernel is based on faux123's enhanced stock kernel. Of course you'll find all the things from faux's ehanced stock kernel and here with more features.
Linux kernel version 3.4.53
Based on faux123's enhanced stock kernel
Clockspeed from 192 MHz and up to 1,7 GHz
CPU supports slow, nominal, fast, and faster
Battery life extender
FIOPS I/O scheduler
SIO I/O scheduler
Voltage control
Gamma control
Fast charge support
Read-ahead buffer size increased to 2048 KB
Low wifi signal is able to be seen
Intelli-Thermal driver from faux123's kernel for better thermal throttling
Wifi fix (included on enhanced stock kernel by faux123)
More optimized
v1.0
You'll find what's inside it, I forgot.
v1.1
You'll find what's inside it, I forgot.
v1.2
Updated the Linux kernel to kernel 3.4.50
v1.3 | Updated
Updated the Linux kernel to kernel 3.4.51
Intelli-Thermal driver from faux123 for better thermal throttling (config it with FauxClock)
---
Compiled with Google GCC 4.7
v1.4
Updated the Linux kernel to kernel 3.4.53
Downloads
v1.0
v1.1
v1.2
v1.3
v1.4
The previous version has been removed. The repo is also removed and dewadgKernel is continued by the current version (previously MFX). But I am planning to build a stock kernel with only necessary features such as fixes. Thanks
Thanks to
Google, CyanogenMod, arco68, hurtsky, faux123, Edoko, showp1984, anarkia1976, mathkid95, motley and many people for helps and sources
All the XDA Developers members who give a lot of informations
Google and DooMLoRD for the toolchain
You, if you tested it or using it
Source
Re: [Kernel][CM10.1] dewadgKernel, stock CM10.1 kernel with some features
Sweet! What are the odds we can get this with color calibration? I always use cm. I prefer stock kernel. Just wish it had color customization like my gnex had
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
Re: [Kernel][CM10.1] dewadgKernel, stock CM10.1 kernel with some features
Cool sob! Nice to see Indonesian devs join the party
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Smallsmx3 said:
Sweet! What are the odds we can get this with color calibration? I always use cm. I prefer stock kernel. Just wish it had color customization like my gnex had
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you, actually I've never tried to compile stock kernel. And I always use CM since in my Galaxy W before XD. I will add it if I can, I'll try
wathefak said:
Cool sob! Nice to see Indonesian devs join the party
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Glad to see an Indonesian in this thread too
R: [Kernel][CM10.1] dewadgKernel, stock CM10.1 kernel with some features
Inviato dal mio Nexus 4 con Tapatalk 2
Can use with cm10 roms only?
Re: [Kernel][CM10.1] dewadgKernel, stock CM10.1 kernel with some features
noky76 said:
Inviato dal mio Nexus 4 con Tapatalk 2
Can use with cm10 roms only?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, it should work with all AOSP ROMs.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using xda premium
Thank you for explaining
dewadg please link to your kernel source.
This is required to comply with GPL.
Andy said:
dewadg please link to your kernel source.
This is required to comply with GPL.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay, but I need time. I downloaded the source by zip file and still have some problem to use Github. Thanks anyway
dewadg said:
Okay, but I need time. I downloaded the source by zip file and still have some problem to use Github. Thanks anyway
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Take your time. But it needs to be posted.
Andy said:
Take your time. But it needs to be posted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've posted it, but the source isn't uploaded yet. It failed everytime I try to upload it
Updated
dewadg said:
Updated
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is it meant to work on any device?
I have samsung galaxy grand duos, with cm 10.1
can i use your kernel?
DBZo07 said:
is it meant to work on any device?
I have samsung galaxy grand duos, with cm 10.1
can i use your kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No.
Sent from my Nexus 4 using Tapatalk 2
DBZo07 said:
is it meant to work on any device?
I have samsung galaxy grand duos, with cm 10.1
can i use your kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol how did you come across this kernel randomly?
DBZo07 said:
is it meant to work on any device?
I have samsung galaxy grand duos, with cm 10.1
can i use your kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What do you mean? It's under Nexus 4 Android Development section. Of course it's only for Nexus 4
dewadg said:
What do you mean? It's under Nexus 4 Android Development section. Of course it's only for Nexus 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oppsss...
Previous reply was short and sweet... I was already answered.
Thanks anyways
---------- Post added at 12:06 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:03 PM ----------
ceejay830731 said:
lol how did you come across this kernel randomly?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol.. My bad... Dint looked at section..
Sorry guys...
DBZo07 said:
Oppsss...
Previous reply was short and sweet... I was already answered.
Thanks anyways
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Don't be offended. I was just telling you so you won't repeat this again. If it is for Galaxy Grand, I will post it under its dev thread (If there).
dewadg said:
Don't be offended. I was just telling you so you won't repeat this again. If it is for Galaxy Grand, I will post it under its dev thread (If there).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok bro..hope we come across randomly...
Nice meeting you guys, sorry... Enjoy...
Hello people!
Why do not we try to build from source CM10.1 HTC explorer long has it
Then our device is just great, especially if you fix Wi-Fi, and it will be very soon!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2129779
Thank you for your attention
saider said:
Hello people!
Why do not we try to build from source CM10.1 HTC explorer long has it
Then our device is just great, especially if you fix Wi-Fi, and it will be very soon!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2129779
Thank you for your attention
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lets wait for the wifi fix then we will do whatever we want
Sent from my HTC Desire C using xda app-developers app
saider said:
Hello people!
Why do not we try to build from source CM10.1 HTC explorer long has it
Then our device is just great, especially if you fix Wi-Fi, and it will be very soon!
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2129779
Thank you for your attention
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i work on it actualy, but i dont have a tester for build and test the build!
But for the moment i have many exam for school :s for 10 day last soo i will compile and test the build my self after my exam! but for the moment if a tester will build, im I am ready to work with him to build, try and resolve bug
We need it and no wi-fi:cyclops:
for811 said:
i work on it actualy, but i dont have a tester for build and test the build!
But for the moment i have many exam for school :s for 10 day last soo i will compile and test the build my self after my exam! but for the moment if a tester will build, im I am ready to work with him to build, try and resolve bug
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can test
Sent from my HTC Desire C using xda premium
---------- Post added at 09:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:30 PM ----------
Shad0wPanda said:
I can test
Sent from my HTC Desire C using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And I can try to build
Sent from my HTC Desire C using xda premium
Shad0wPanda said:
I can test
Sent from my HTC Desire C using xda premium
---------- Post added at 09:31 PM ---------- Previous post was at 09:30 PM ----------
And I can try to build
Sent from my HTC Desire C using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i work actually on it, but if you want, the link of the device and kernel tree: My Github
for811 said:
i work actually on it, but if you want, the link of the device and kernel tree: My Github
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We'll as I only have a weak processor I can help but I'm new to source compiling so give me some guidance and ill try and ill be you tester. XD
Sent from my HTC Desire C using xda premium
I only can say good luck with your rom, will test when you release it :3
There is a development of the 10.1?
saider said:
There is a development of the 10.1?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There was but Jotha closed it as it wasnt making any progress.
Also is anybody building CM10.1 at the moment as i would but
1. 40gb usage limit
2.intel core 2 duo 2.33ghz
Shad0wPanda said:
There was but Jotha closed it as it wasnt making any progress.
Also is anybody building CM10.1 at the moment as i would but
1. 40gb usage limit
2.intel core 2 duo 2.33ghz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wait it out, there is a trio trying to build it for Desire C, trust me just give it some time and it shall come
And i'm building PAC on 1GHZ :')
i need a tester for test a new port rom pm me tester!
penguin449 said:
Wait it out, there is a trio trying to build it for Desire C, trust me just give it some time and it shall come
And i'm building PAC on 1GHZ :')
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ah but do you have unlimited usage?
Sent from my HTC Desire C using xda premium
for811 said:
i need a tester for test a new port rom pm me tester!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
deleted
saider said:
deleted
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
guys if you want i can try building cm10.1 or any custom aftermarket distributions based on android 4.1
speed_bot said:
guys if you want i can try building cm10.1 or any custom aftermarket distributions based on android 4.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And we can test your builds .
speed_bot said:
guys if you want i can try building cm10.1 or any custom aftermarket distributions based on android 4.1
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you try making jellybam
sent from CM10'd Desire C
Phenziox said:
Can you try making jellybam
sent from CM10'd Desire C
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
give me their link(github) i will make it.
https://github.com/iGio90 that's the developers github, if that's what you mean
Phenziox said:
https://github.com/iGio90 that's the developers github, if that's what you mean
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I dont think they have a branch for 4.1.2 there. I can only see bam6 in his git (https://github.com/iGio90/platform_manifest) and i think that is 4.2.2.
is there one, or is vanir kernel good enough for battery and performance?
xxlocalxx said:
is there one, or is vanir kernel good enough for battery and performance?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Try and see..
Look at the other threads and you will find the answer of your question..
which threads
can i use any kernel who is based on cm 10.2?
with stock cm my home button isnt working, i enabled it on menu
Look in anykernel thread. There are actually all kernel that you can use. Flash one of them and you can look which one is the best for you.
The best for me is iodak kernel
xxlocalxx said:
is there one, or is vanir kernel good enough for battery and performance?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not a DEVELOPMENT question, so why the hell have you posted it in here? Are you too lazy to actually bother reading the rules and guidelines?
Questions go in the Q&A forums - not really surprising!
xxlocalxx said:
is there one, or is vanir kernel good enough for battery and performance?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you already request a kernel for vanir in Development Section, than build your kernel by own !
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
---------- Post added at 06:54 PM ---------- Previous post was at 06:54 PM ----------
SimonTS said:
Not a DEVELOPMENT question, so why the hell have you posted it in here? Are you too lazy to actually bother reading the rules and guidelines?
Questions go in the Q&A forums - not really surprising!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
We do not allow best ROM/Kernel threads on XDA. Your view of good battery and performance may be different to someone else. head over to the development section ,try some out and see which best suits your needs.
Thread closed