I know it's an energy saver but how does it work? I am also a bit worried that it needs massive amount of permissions.
wtx1033 said:
I know it's an energy saver but how does it work? I am also a bit worried that it needs massive amount of permissions.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you're talking about maclaw parts apk that came in cm10.2, it sets your kernel to ondemand governor to save the battery.
mauam said:
If you're talking about maclaw parts apk that came in cm10.2, it sets your kernel to ondemand governor to save the battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes that's the app I'm talking about and thanks for the explanation.
Any idea why it needs this many permissions?
Sent from my GT-I8190 using Tapatalk
wtx1033 said:
Yes that's the app I'm talking about and thanks for the explanation.
Any idea why it needs this many permissions?
Sent from my GT-I8190 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have the same question @New Macław.
Also, I can't find it in the privacy section (where you can block apps permissions).
snifer1981 said:
I have the same question @New Macław.
Also, I can't find it in the privacy section (where you can block apps permissions).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bud,
You can wait sitting till Maclaw reply:laugh: Anyway, if don't trust the app, you can always delete it Have a nice day.
Related
how to increase battery life in cm9.
& how can i fix deep sleep.
plz help.
thanks in advance
Who knows....contact Maclaw.
He doesn't fix it so there is nothing you can do.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk 2
I guess it is a basic glitch of battery in CM9 Base itself. Devs are not to be blamed. Try to use something like droid wall to monitor apps which basically give a trick to you everyday and access net from your phone. If possible also try to use batteryextender xda edition from the XDA forums.
Lets see if these help your battery save.
badjaguar007 said:
I guess it is a basic glitch of battery in CM9 Base itself. Devs are not to be blamed. Try to use something like droid wall to monitor apps which basically give a trick to you everyday and access net from your phone. If possible also try to use batteryextender xda edition from the XDA forums.
Lets see if these help your battery save.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. I don't think so. CM9 for other devices do not have this bug.
galaxyace152 said:
No. I don't think so. CM9 for other devices do not have this bug.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Please ask CM9 and CM10 questions here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1742844
SMillerNL said:
Please ask CM9 and CM10 questions here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1742844
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why should I ask? I do not have any questions..!?
Sent from my GT-S5830 using Tapatalk 2
For CM9, Just Flash OOM Priority Changer for battery life. Not that much effect though...
And, flash adrenaline engine for deep sleep
I don't really know if they work. but that's what some users say.
xD
masterex567 said:
For CM9, Just Flash OOM Priority Changer for battery life. Not that much effect though...
And, flash adrenaline engine for deep sleep
I don't really know if they work. but that's what some users say.
xD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OOM Priority Changer doesn't have anything to do with battery. I think its for better Multitasking or switching apps.
Shadow xD said:
OOM Priority Changer doesn't have anything to do with battery. I think its for better Multitasking or switching apps.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh..Ok.
Misunderstood it's use. Coz, i heard people in the forums saying it's good for battery life.
Thanks for the correction though.
Do you guys think a modified framework-res could cause a bettery drain?
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
I doubt it, It depends on what you mean by modified ? If it is simple icon / colour changes then no, If it is something that increases the amount of power needed (like modifying auto brightness values or whatever is hidden inside the framework) then yes.
The best way for identifying battery drain is better battery stats, It gives you in-depth info of wakelocks, times, amount of power used, name of app etc etc. Its a really useful app !
Ot wasnt anything major. Just the lock scrren text 'swipe to unlock'
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
yeah and check loggs for errors, if the modification is not big free and triggering a recurring error it could cause drain.
also a modified framework, could have malware, who knows
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2
baz77 said:
yeah and check loggs for errors, if the modification is not big free and triggering a recurring error it could cause drain.
also a modified framework, could have malware, who knows
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ok thanks. It wont have malware. I made the mod myself
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
maskerwsk said:
Do you guys think a modified framework-res could cause a bettery drain?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sorry for OT: the "battety brain" in thread title is an eye-catcher...
p107r0 said:
sorry for OT: the "battety brain" in thread title is an eye-catcher...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
lol
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 2
Hi I realise this is (probably?) a kernel dependent option but it would be nice to have an app that changed mdnie settings depending on user actions.
For example if the user viewed a video it could change to video/natural then back to UI/dynamic when playback ceased.
Is there such thing as this ? It would be a nice addition to NXTweaks and other similar apps if not.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
This could be great. But AFAIK, its really hard to detect what kind of action the user is performing due to the fact that too many permissions would be required, and too much trouble to merge it in the kernel.
You probably will never see it around
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 4
projeto56 said:
This could be great. But AFAIK, its really hard to detect what kind of action the user is performing due to the fact that too many permissions would be required, and too much trouble to merge it in the kernel.
You probably will never see it around
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe Toggle Switch Widget?
Up, cause I'm looking for something like this and can't find anything...
sanefirst said:
Maybe Toggle Switch Widget?
Up, cause I'm looking for something like this and can't find anything...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But that wouldn't be automagically. Ypu would have to switch everytime
projeto56 said:
But that wouldn't be automagically. Ypu would have to switch everytime
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, but it will still be better than going to Settings=>My Device=>Display=>Screen Mode=>select... save...
I did some checking in the /sys folders on my Z1 and found this file called "fake_battery" and a value of -22..
What is this parameter related file doing actually for our Z1 phones?
I created an init.d script that echoed an 0 command on that fake_battery file and rapid battery drain issues after full charge did disappear..
EDIT: If someone wants to try this init.d script just for confirm that this isn't any placebo effect - I can upload it here!
Sent from my C6903 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Destroyedbeauty said:
I did some checking in the /sys folders on my Z1 and found this file called "fake_battery" and a value of -22..
What is this parameter related file doing actually for our Z1 phones?
I created an init.d script that echoed an 0 command on that fake_battery file and rapid battery drain issues after full charge did disappear..
EDIT: If someone wants to try this init.d script just for confirm that this isn't any placebo effect - I can upload it here!
Sent from my C6903 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No such file - what have you been playing around with
harfot said:
No such file - what have you been playing around with
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Found this on advanced stock kernel.. Should then be on stock also.. Very confusing, but I've not played with anything because this is inside the kernel / driver related folders and I am not into kernel hacking..
Sure u looked in the right folder?
Sent from my SGP311 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Destroyedbeauty said:
Found this on advanced stock kernel.. Should then be on stock also.. Very confusing, but I've not played with anything because this is inside the kernel / driver related folders and I am not into kernel hacking..
Sure u looked in the right folder?
Sent from my SGP311 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Found it, but maybe this https://github.com/openwebos/nyx-modules/blob/master/src/rockhopper/battery/emulator/fake_battery.c gives a clue
harfot said:
Found it, but maybe this https://github.com/openwebos/nyx-modules/blob/master/src/rockhopper/battery/emulator/fake_battery.c gives a clue
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any clue or suggestion why it is echoed -22 as pre-configured? What does this file even do?
Your link didn't make anything more clear on this one..
In no expert but maybe there are a set of commands used by android with non stock or "fake" batterys...that's what I understood from the link harfot provided...again I'm no expert just my 2 cents haha
Sent from my C6903 using Tapatalk
Destroyedbeauty said:
Any clue or suggestion why it is echoed -22 as pre-configured? What does this file even do?
Your link didn't make anything more clear on this one..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cippi21 said:
In no expert but maybe there are a set of commands used by android with non stock or "fake" batterys...that's what I understood from the link harfot provided...again I'm no expert just my 2 cents haha
Sent from my C6903 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you are quite right - almost every (not to say all) manufacturers use a higher Amps level for charging their own (known) batteries opposed to unknown (fake) batteries which for security reasons are charged at a lower level.
harfot said:
I think you are quite right - almost every (not to say all) manufacturers use a higher Amps level for charging their own (known) batteries opposed to unknown (fake) batteries which for security reasons are charged at a lower level.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, using an ' echo 0 ' command on the fakebattery file solved my rapid battery drain behaviour, so maybe something was causing misreadings of the actual battery gauge level with pre-configured "-22" value. Before, my drain started to act normal when at 75-78% procentage left, now it is normal drain..
Destroyedbeauty said:
Well, using an ' echo 0 ' command on the fakebattery file solved my rapid battery drain behaviour, so maybe something was causing misreadings of the actual battery gauge level with pre-configured "-22" value. Before, my drain started to act normal when at 75-78% procentage left, now it is normal drain..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Rebooting changes value back to "-22" (without any scripts) but "0" value don't seem to change when connecting to USB or Sony charger (don't have any other supply at hand right now).
harfot said:
Rebooting changes value back to "-22" (without any scripts) but "0" value don't seem to change when connecting to USB or Sony charger (don't have any other supply at hand right now).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Use init.d script and it will stay at 0 forever!
Sent from my SGP311 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Destroyedbeauty said:
Use init.d script and it will stay at 0 forever!
Sent from my SGP311 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Tried it with an iPhone supply - value returns to "-22"
harfot said:
Tried it with an iPhone supply - value returns to "-22"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have u gived the script proper permissions?
Destroyedbeauty said:
Have u gived the script proper permissions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not using script at the moment - curious to find out whether other values would show up.
So, I've looking at squeezing more juice out of my battery lately. One of the things I was trying was switching to Conservative governor. I really don't mind lag, after all, while trying to get the most battery life a little lag is expected if not inevitable. But when using SetCPU to try to change the sampling rate it won't allow me to change it below 200000. Has anyone found a method to change it or does any one have any other ideas???
Sent from my SM-G900F using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Lol, no input guys??? What is everyone using for their governor then???
Sent from my SM-G900F using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
I used rom toolbox lite
jgz32610 said:
I used rom toolbox lite
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I know you can use rom toolbox, but can you change the sampling rate to anything less than 200000 on Conservative?
So you mean to tell me that everyone in this forum claiming to get over 24 hours of battery life has not touched any of the cpu settings????? I find that hard to believe. Someone must have some info on this.
cerobles1 said:
So you mean to tell me that everyone in this forum claiming to get over 24 hours of battery life has not touched any of the cpu settings????? I find that hard to believe. Someone must have some info on this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not really that hard... My phone with bluetooth on, no wifi, and using only LTE throughout the day until I got home with 10% left.
Stock ROM
Rooted
xPosed
That's it.
Kenichi
Kenichi said:
Not really that hard... My phone with bluetooth on, no wifi, and using only LTE throughout the day until I got home with 10% left.
Stock ROM
Rooted
xPosed
That's it.
Kenichi
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What xposed modules are u using? And are they related to battery saving? TIA.
cerobles1 said:
What xposed modules are u using? And are they related to battery saving? TIA.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No. If anything, it should hurt my battery life.
Kenichi