[Q] cifs module - Asus Transformer TF701

Hello,
Does anyone have cifs module for the TF701?

jenowa said:
Hello,
Does anyone have cifs module for the TF701?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Needs to be compiled into the kernel normally as insmod adding cifs.ko stopped working since android 4.2 due to the way google made changes. We don't have kernel sources for 4.3 yet.

sbdags said:
Needs to be compiled into the kernel normally as insmod adding cifs.ko stopped working since android 4.2 due to the way google made changes. We don't have kernel sources for 4.3 yet.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank You for the informative reply.

Related

Compatible cifs.ko

Can some one compile or point me to a cifs.ko that is compatible with the incredible. The ones I can find do not seem to be. Thanks in advance.
Interesting
http://linux.die.net/man/8/mount.cifs Not that I can help but if anyone wanted a quick reference.
Alot of the roms for other phones have it but its not compatible with out kernel. Is there a guide how to compile kernels? I made a couple in linux that worked. long ago..
here ya go...what app are you using to browse CIFS shares? I haven't tested this module, but just compiled it now.
Forgive me as I haven't actually tried this, but here is the 10,000 foot view:
At a minimum, you will need a linux system, with a gcc-arm cross compiler set up. I believe the android-sdk provides one. The version used by current kernels is gcc-4.4.4.
Then you will need the sources of the kernel you are running. The hydra kernel git tree is here: http://github.com/ejhart/Hydra-kernels.git , and the stock kernel sources are here: http://member.america.htc.com/download/RomCode/Source_and_Binaries/incrediblec_cc1c2268.tar.bz2
The hydra git tree doesn't seem to have a a working .config included, but this isn't so important if you are only building and installing kernel modules. From there, you'll need to configure the kernel in cross compiler mode, add the modules you want, and you will need to make sure the version magic string is identical to the kernel you are using. From there run make, and once the compile is finished, find the .ko 's you want, and push them to the /system/modules folder where you can insmod them.
Edit: You can use the .config from /proc/config.gz, didn't see it in there before.
mattwood2000 said:
here ya go...what app are you using to browse CIFS shares? I haven't tested this module, but just compiled it now.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I got one from another user but thanks do you still want me to try it? I mounted my share in a directory on the SDCARD so i can browse it with any file manager. I think any app that scans the sd card will also scan my server with about 8TB so that is a minor issue.
kernel compile guide
A guide for compiling kernels can be found here :
http://code.google.com/p/android-serialport-api/wiki/Htc
I not a techie and a newbie at any android development.
Since the guide is more or less a a set of instructions with no theory.
Got it to run, but not sure what I was doing.
Any assistance in provide either cifs.ko for the HTC Aria w/ kernel version :
liberty-2.6.29-21f066a6 or instructions on how to compile the module would be greatly
appreciated.
BTW - there an app on the store for automating the CIFS mount (CIFSManager
Regards,
-d
veli69 said:
I got one from another user but thanks do you still want me to try it? I mounted my share in a directory on the SDCARD so i can browse it with any file manager. I think any app that scans the sd card will also scan my server with about 8TB so that is a minor issue.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Could you please post the cifs.ko file that you have that works. Thanks.
OOMatter said:
Could you please post the cifs.ko file that you have that works.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Note that the post you quote was from before the 2.2 OTA, and hence that cifs.ko would be incompatible with the current kernel.
elborak said:
Note that the post you quote was from before the 2.2 OTA, and hence that cifs.ko would be incompatible with the current kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for pointing that out. So does anyone have a compatible cifs.ko for the current DINC kernel?
OOMatter said:
Thanks for pointing that out. So does anyone have a compatible cifs.ko for the current DINC kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do. Check my blog. http://adrynalyne.us
Sent from my ADR6300 using XDA App
veli69 said:
Alot of the roms for other phones have it but its not compatible with out kernel. Is there a guide how to compile kernels? I made a couple in linux that worked. long ago..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://marakana.com/forums/android/examples/111.html
GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOGLE!!!!!!!!! YEAH!
Thats all fine and dandy except our source isn't on any git.
developer.htc.com
philips w732 vermagic '3.0.13 preempt mod_unload armv7' working cifs.ko and md4.ko modules
narod.ru/disk/63766749001.47b679339538b050028c3c7d87506dd2/md4.ko.html
narod.ru/disk/63743140001.693272f3661d5aac547ecc760f04db05/cifs.ko.html

Quick kernel question...

What file is the wifi kernel module for our legends?
Quanny2000 said:
What file is the wifi kernel module for our legends?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I expected it to be tiwlan_drv.ko, but I can't find it after compiling the kernel.
kugel. said:
I expected it to be tiwlan_drv.ko, but I can't find it after compiling the kernel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You may have to recompile the wifi module, and link it to the new kernel
HpX said:
You may have to recompile the wifi module, and link it to the new kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
figured out its definately tiwlan_drv.ko, but apparently sdio is linked to it, inwhich i had disabled in config, find out shortly if it fixes my broken wifi
No, that's not how it works. Modules sdio.ko and tiwlan_drv.ko are both from TI driver and not available in kernel source so they can not be compiled for your favorite kernel version. You will have to adapt and use the same kernel version as those two were compiled against...

Q: atrix fbcon

Has anyone got the fbcon framebuffer console to work on the Atrix ?
I have sucessfully compiled an atrix tegra kernel from source and booted on my 4.5.91 (2.3.4) Atrix.
I have 'sucessfully' set the frame buffer console and enabled fbcon via menu config.
These were compiled as builtin modules and built a zImage without any issues.
However, the new kernel fails to boot where the 'default .config' built kernel will boot.
I was hoping to get lucky and override the /dev/graphics/fb0 limitation on these devices. I need the framebuffer to run a framebuffer applictaion proir to starting up android after the kernel boots. I have the capability working on the nexus one just having trouble porting to the Atrix.
Does anyone know a simple kernel trick to fix the framebuffer?
Thanks in advance.
Maybe this will be of help
https://github.com/epsylon3/kernel-MB860/commit/17d7beda6baf7fdee731863ef0ae03785f30eb7b
turl1 said:
Maybe this will be of help
https://github.com/epsylon3/kernel-MB860/commit/17d7beda6baf7fdee731863ef0ae03785f30eb7b
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It sure was. Thank you very much for the shove in the right direction.
I grabbed that git tree and configured tegra_olympus_cm7_def_config and set that switch. So I can read the framebuffer but have yet to be able to display what I right. Thanks again.
SOLVED
turl1 said:
Maybe this will be of help
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks again turl1.
there was one more hitch where you actually have to swap buffers using an ioctl found in system/device/motorolo/olympus/recovery/graphics.c:
FBIOPUT_VSCREENINFO

[KERNEL] Building additional modules for JB stock kernels

Some background info:
I'm the author of PPP Widget which is an app that enables mobile data connections on Android devices with USB host capabilities - even if they are WiFi-only.
It turned out that many Android devices have the drivers for 3G sticks already on board, included with the stock kernel. The one large exception are Samsung devices ...
I started to provide the missing drivers as modules (mostly "ppp_async" and "option" which depends on "usb_wwan"). That worked well for some Google devices and also for Samsung devices running ICS, using the source packages from
http://opensource.samsung.com/
In their JB kernels though, Samsung enabled the "MODVERSION" option. Furthermore, compiling the modules with the officially recommended toolchain resulted in a different "module_layout" checksum than in the modules provided in the firmware.
This prevents using any additonal modules on the devices. "insmod" refuses to load these modules.
The only explanation for this problem is that the custom device configuration provided in the source packages does not match the configuration of the device kernel.
This is the case for all GT-P31xx and GT-P51xx models as far as I can tell.
My take is that Samsung is required to provide the correct kernel configuration under the rules of the GPL. Maybe anyone else wants to contact Samsung on this behalf; I already did several times - still waiting for an answer ...
That's the reason why I build everyting from source including the GPU driver and lost exFAT support http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1859227 and the boot image result http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1855700 .
ketut.kumajaya said:
That's the reason why I build everyting from source including the GPU driver and lost exFAT support
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Unfortunately, replacing the kernel is no option for end users. The modules I provide are going into a folder on the sdcard, and can be "insmod'ed" from there with no problem - once their magic string and the "modversions" are matching the kernel on the device. The latter is the wall I'm hitting ...
JFDee said:
Unfortunately, replacing the kernel is no option for end users. The modules I provide are going into a folder on the sdcard, and can be "insmod'ed" from there with no problem - once their magic string and the "modversions" are matching the kernel on the device. The latter is the wall I'm hitting ...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanx alot for such a great development. ...
Adi™
Creator Of Sungsonic™HD
I have received a reply from Samsung. They have updated the JB open source package for GT-P3110, GT-P5110 and GT-N7100 (which previously included a config file from 3.0.15 for a kernel version of 3.0.31 !!).
Unfortunately, the modversions of the compiled kernel are still different and incompatible. I have replied with these finding.
Waiting again ...
BTW, the only recent kernel config consistent with the actual device kernel that I have found is for the GT-N8000 (3.0.31). So it is possible to provide a matching configuration.
JFDee said:
I have received a reply from Samsung. They have updated the JB open source package for GT-P3110, GT-P5110 and GT-N7100 (which previously included a config file from 3.0.15 for a kernel version of 3.0.31 !!).
Unfortunately, the modversions of the compiled kernel are still different and incompatible. I have replied with these finding.
Waiting again ...
BTW, the only recent kernel config consistent with the actual device kernel that I have found is for the GT-N8000 (3.0.31). So it is possible to provide a matching configuration.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If You will start to work with kernel I'm willing to beta test with my P5110. Only issue for me is that I need to know what 3G dongle to buy (well need it anyway so would prefer an advice from someone who know something about it). I'm living in Poland and Ireland (once here once there) so I can even test LTE modems (well donations here, myself can spend up to ~50€ on 3G one) because in Wroclaw, Poland I heard it's quite good, also I got H+/H on SGSII here. While in Ireland signal is not THAT strong due to fact most of places are quite remote (except Dublin, Galway etc). Hope I can help in either way
This is what I wrote to Samsung concerning the botched configuration file provided with the latest GT-P3110 kernel source:
Thank you for the source code update.
However, I have asked for the kernel configuration that matches exactly the kernel on the GT-P3110.
I have compiled the kernel from the provided update, but the module layout checksum does *not* match the one from the kernel running on my device.
On the device: module_layout 0xb5a27644
From source: module_layout 0x143474f1
I have used the recommended toolchain "CodeSourcery 2010q1" and the unchanged config file provided with the source ("android_espresso_omap4430_r04_user_defconfig").
Please be aware that you are obliged by the GPL to provide the correct config file for the binary kernel that you are distributing.
As a side note: the configuration provided with the kernel source for the GT-N8000 *does* match the kernel on the device, so there is no doubt that it is possible to get the configuration right.
Other Android vendors are just enabling the "embedded" config file in the kernel, so that the correct configuration is simply available on the device as "/proc/config.gz". This is so much less trouble. I suggest that you enable this option for Samsung kernels too.
Regards,
...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The GT-N8010 is also in the same situation you describe - config for 3.0.15 and jb stock kernel at 3.0.31, can't build working modules for stock.
davp, there seems to have been some activity at the Samsung open source center after my messages.
I suggest you make yourself heard as well. Use the "Inquiry" button next to the package download link in the table for your device.
To be able to add working modules to the device, the kernel configuration for the source has to be 100% compatible. It does not matter if any closed drivers are missing as we don't want to replace the kernel - but all those general debugging config options should be correct.
BTW, there is a history of similar issues:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1123643
The kernel source for the GT-P3110 has been updated once more, and this time they have fixed the configuration.
With the latest JB update we can actually build working modules for the current firmware.
I confirmed this to the Samsung people and reminded them of the other devices in need of this fix: GT-P3100, GT-P5100, GT-P5110, GT-N7100 and probably more (like the GT-N8010).
JFDee said:
The kernel source for the GT-P3110 has been updated once more, and this time they have fixed the configuration.
With the latest JB update we can actually build working modules for the current firmware.
I confirmed this to the Samsung people and reminded them of the other devices in need of this fix: GT-P3100, GT-P5100, GT-P5110, GT-N7100 and probably more (like the GT-N8010).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So for now we might get stock kernel which will support 3G modems via USB OTG? How about other kernels such as CM10.1?
I'm looking for good 3G dongle then Any advices?
Additional kernel modules for stock JB P31xx (tested) and P51xx (untested), contains:
- usb_wwan, ppp_async, and option module for PPP Widget
- dns_resolver, md4, and cifs module for cifs/samba filesystem support
- sunrpc, lockd, and nfs module for nfs filesystem support
Kernel config file attached.
FTDI Single Port Serial Driver added.
cifs.ko not working on P3100 JB 4.1.2 (stock rooted)
ketut.kumajaya said:
Additional kernel modules for stock JB P31xx (tested) and P51xx (untested), contains:
- usb_wwan, ppp_async, and option module for PPP Widget
- dns_resolver, md4, and cifs module for cifs/samba filesystem support
- sunrpc, lockd, and nfs module for nfs filesystem support
Kernel config file attached.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi ketut.kumajaya,
I'm trying to use cifs.ko but i get:
/system/lib/modules # insmod cifs.ko
insmod: can't insert 'cifs.ko': unknown symbol in module or invalid parameter
I have:
/system/lib/modules # uname -a
Linux localhost 3.0.31-1084989 #1 SMP PREEMPT Mon Mar 25 14:53:07 KST 2013 armv7l GNU/Linux
I tried other cirs.ko with same result.
Can you give me some clues of what can I do?
Thank you.
Try insmod in order:
insmod dns_resolver.ko
insmod md4.ko
insmod cifs.ko
If something goes wrong, see the kernel messages using dmesg.
ketut.kumajaya said:
Try insmod in order:
insmod dns_resolver.ko
insmod md4.ko
insmod cifs.ko
If something goes wrong, see the kernel messages using dmesg.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Great!!!
That's the solution.
In my Tab 10.1 4.0.4 I'm loading (different kernel and different modules, of course):
insmod cifs.ko
insmod md4.ko
insmod nls_utf8.ko
So I was not thinking I should use a different order.
Thank you.

[KERNEL] [KEXEC] Kernel EXECution for locked devices [N900V] [WIP]

THIS THREAD IS WIP & FOR DEVELOPERS ONLY !
Technical information with sources & binaries is in post #2. It includes kernel building, kexec-module, kexec-tools, hijack script, required patches & current problems with logs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What is kexec?​--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------​
kexec or kernel execution is a module/mechanism of the kernel that allows live/hot booting of a new/custom kernel "over" the currently running kernel. For more info, read the useful threads/links bellow.
kexec could be used to load a custom kernel into memory & yes, we'll then be able to install AOSP ROMs or in general run a custom kernel compatible with our device.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Updates:​--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------​
[09/01/2014]:​
kexec module has been successfully patched & loaded/inserted into both NC2 & NC4 stock kernels. Now, I'm working on compiling/loading a guest kernel & fixing possible problems/bugs.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
[08/31/2014]:​
Two versions of HLTEVZW KK kernel have been compiled from source: one uses the default configurations & the 2nd adds custom capabilities & kexec boot options. Moreover, kexec-tools & module have been cross-compiled. Now, I'm working on patches for kexec module & guest kernel (the hardest part).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
[08/01/2014]:​
I've successfully flashed a custom kernel on my device. This trips knox flag & isn't 100% related to kexec, but it has the same objective (loading custom kernel on the locked-bootloader devices). However, the bootloader makes security check & blocks the installed kernel with the "unauthorized software by VZW" warning. Then, I tried to patch the bootloader to remove this security check, but my device was HARD BRICKED. Now, I've created a General thread for how to recover from a HARD BRICK. This is promising info for testing bootloader exploits.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
​​
Status
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------​
Supported NC2 & NC4 kernels
Working kexec-tools
Loaded kexec module
WIP kexec/guest kernel​
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks to / Credits:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------​
@sextape - for the leaked NC2 firmware
@Hashcode - for his great work on kernel/recovery
...
Please PM me if I forgot to add proper credits for your work!​
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
​
XDA:DevDB Information
KEXEC, Kernel for the Verizon Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Contributors
hsbadr, CalcProgrammer1, ryanbg
Kernel Special Features:
Version Information
Status: Testing
Created 2014-07-11
Last Updated 2015-02-15
Technical Information
This post is reserved for technical information with sources & binaries. This includes kernel building, kexec-module, kexec-tools, hijack script, required patches & current problems.
Kernel Building:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------​
The first step for building working kexec-module & tools is to cross-compile the kernel from source with the correct configurations. I won't describe how to build a kernel from source, but you may find this thread very useful.
I've used two different sources for the NC4/NC2 HLTE_VZW KK kernels. The 1st one is a part of SM-N900V_NA_KK_Opensource.zip released by Samsung for N900V NC4 kernel while the 2nd is available on @Hashcode's Github profile with 3 branches: hltevzw-kk-nc2 branch is modified for N900V NC2 kernel + 15 commits for compiling kexec as a module & other kexec patches.
The instructions provided by Samsung to build the NC4 kernel are to update CROSS_COMPILE toolchain environment variable in the Makefile & build with the default configurations as follows:
Code:
export ARCH=arm
make VARIANT_DEFCONFIG=msm8974_sec_hlte_vzw_defconfig msm8974_sec_defconfig SELINUX_DEFCONFIG=selinux_defconfig
make
However, I've patched the sources & used menuconfig interface to customize kernel configurations as follows:
Code:
export ARCH=arm
make VARIANT_DEFCONFIG=msm8974_sec_hlte_vzw_defconfig msm8974_sec_defconfig SELINUX_DEFCONFIG=selinux_defconfig menuconfig
make
(menuconfig is added in the second line)
The default output is the kernel image (arch/arm/boot/zImage) & modules (drivers/*/*.ko). The kexec-module(s) will be built if you patched the sources & configured it as a module.
You may then use dtbTool to generate device tree dt.img & mkbootimg to pack the kernel in boot.img.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kexec Module:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------​
There're many different flavors of kexec-mod sources. @delewer in this thread uses a standalone kexec-mod source MOD'd for Sony Xperia Z1 to be cross-compiled against the precompiled kernel source while @Hashcode in his sources on Github patches the kernel source to cross-compile kexec-mod with the kernel. Some modules may or may not use/port the hardboot patches. The output for kexec module/drivers have different names (the standalone kexec-mod source generates kexec_load.ko & procfs_rw.ko while the kernel source patched by @Hashcode generates 3 modules: arm_kexec.ko, msm_kexec.ko & kexec.ko).
To test if the cross-compiled modules are loadable & have the correct kernel headers, use insmod in terminal emulator (or a safe point with terminal like Safestrap) to insert the module into the kernel (assuming you've kexec.ko in /system/lib/modules/):
Code:
insmod /system/lib/modules/kexec.ko
Then, use lsmod to list & show the status of loaded modules:
Code:
lsmod
Alternatively, you may check if system call of the kernel includes kexec functions using:
Code:
cat /proc/kallsyms | grep kexec
The kexec-modules I've compiled are loadable & have been successfully inserted into both NC4 & NC2 kernels.
I'm using my own sources for kexec-module based on others & I'll share the sources with binaries & modules after making some required tests.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kexec Tools:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------​
I'm using the latest version of kexec-tools from here (currently, kexec-tools-2.0.8.tar.gz) cross-compiled for arm with custom configurations. Three binaries are generated including kexec (directly boot into a new kernel) & kdump (display kernel trace data). For more info, check the manpage of each binary & kexec/kexec-tools manuals/guides.
To test your kexec-tools cross-compiled binaries for arm,
Code:
kexec --help
assuming that they're in your PATH (e.g., /system/xbin) with executable permissions (e.g., 755).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hijack Script:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
will be updated soon...​
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Required Patches:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
will be updated soon...​
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Current Problems/Logs:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
will be updated soon...​
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
jr_718 said:
Sent from my SM-G900V using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My eyes about popped out the side of my head when I saw this! It says your in testing have you had any luck at all? Thank you thank you thank you BTW!
amebiasis said:
My eyes about popped out the side of my head when I saw this! It says your in testing have you had any luck at all? Thank you thank you thank you BTW!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've tested several binaries for the same kernel version, but none works for now. I'll compile from source & see. However, please keep this this thread for devs discussions only until we release working kexec & guest kernel.
Trying to keep the n3 alive before the n4 arrives? Lol seriously though congrats and thank you. Hope you and the devs here the best of luck. We, the re owners, appreciate all you have done already for us.
bmwh0r3 said:
Trying to keep the n3 alive before the n4 arrives? Lol seriously though congrats and thank you. Hope you and the devs here the best of luck. We, the re owners, appreciate all you have done already for us.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Note 4 is useless until it gets root & custom ROMs. For me, it'll be better ONLY IF we can break its security & unlock bootloader!
What about surge & ryanbg and e.v.a. I been following them and they both have a good idea on how things work well I think they are good for the job
Just a thought I had when unlocking my spare RAZR hd, but the kernels on the Razr and my note 3 are 3.4.97 and 3.4.0. Is the exploit part of the kernel or is there a reason I'm a user and not a Dev? If it is, motopacalypse.apk is what unlocked my RAZR. I'm just trying to learn so please don't think I'm a moron. I just don't know the coding aspect of android at all.
Have you got an irc or hangout open for discussion?
Thanks for your efforts! !
tpike said:
Have you got an irc or hangout open for discussion?
Thanks for your efforts! !
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There is #Galaxy-Note-3 on Freenode but it's really quiet in there most of the time.
Many forum lurkers like me have been anxiously waiting for this breakthrough! Don't give up! I also believe in donating to hardworking devs like you guys! Good luck...
I was an owner of a Motorola Defy and the day that it got KEXEC I was so exited.. so good luck for you guys! Nothing is impossible. :victory:
Feche said:
I was an owner of a Motorola Defy and the day that it got KEXEC I was so exited.. so good luck for you guys! Nothing is impossible. :victory:
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Who was devs on kexec on defy?
ironfisted said:
Who was devs on kexec on defy?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not sure
I've been working on kexec for a little while now with limited success. My biggest problem is the getting the 4 byte CRCs for the kernel symbols used by the kexec module. Same with a few other projects I'm working on. They compiled the NC2 kernel with MOD VERSION and CRC. I've compiled it from source, but there's so much work to be done my head is spinning.
ryanbg said:
I've been working on kexec for a little while now with limited success. My biggest problem is the getting the 4 byte CRCs for the kernel symbols used by the kexec module. Same with a few other projects I'm working on. They compiled the NC2 kernel with MOD VERSION and CRC. I've compiled it from source, but there's so much work to be done my head is spinning.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Good luck! Lots of us are waiting for this!
ryanbg said:
I've been working on kexec for a little while now with limited success. My biggest problem is the getting the 4 byte CRCs for the kernel symbols used by the kexec module. Same with a few other projects I'm working on. They compiled the NC2 kernel with MOD VERSION and CRC. I've compiled it from source, but there's so much work to be done my head is spinning.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Keep it up man, I understand the hard work involved in doing something like this, but it will definitely pay of in the end!!! Thank you for your hard work and dedication, you got a lot of people counting on you
Sent from my BajaRom "L" Themed Note 3
ryanbg said:
I've been working on kexec for a little while now with limited success. My biggest problem is the getting the 4 byte CRCs for the kernel symbols used by the kexec module. Same with a few other projects I'm working on. They compiled the NC2 kernel with MOD VERSION and CRC. I've compiled it from source, but there's so much work to be done my head is spinning.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I see. Let me know if you'd like to contribute to this thread. I'll update it soon with more details about the required patches & the preliminary results of my tests ––after releasing a new version of JasmineROM.
ryanbg said:
I've been working on kexec for a little while now with limited success. My biggest problem is the getting the 4 byte CRCs for the kernel symbols used by the kexec module. Same with a few other projects I'm working on. They compiled the NC2 kernel with MOD VERSION and CRC. I've compiled it from source, but there's so much work to be done my head is spinning.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was told by a defy dev that we would have better luck contacting hp touch pad kernel devs. I guess their kernel is more like ours I guess. Idk. I never tried contacting dev from their yet

Categories

Resources