Related
Hello guys.
Sorry for opening new thread, and I hope that there doesn't already exist something like that.
I have one question, where can I follow when will Android 4.0 ICS come out for Samsung Galaxy Note N7000?
Thank you very much for help!
Best regards.
saMMuel'sky said:
Hello guys.
Sorry for opening new thread, and I hope that there doesn't already exist something like that.
I have one question, where can I follow when will Android 4.0 ICS come out for Samsung Galaxy Note N7000?
Thank you very much for help!
Best regards.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you are thinking about an official rom don't worry it will be all over internet.
But if you want now you can have a look on the Development section.
Yesterday if I'm not wrong they change the date for release official release for the Q2 2012.
saMMuel'sky said:
Hello guys.
Sorry for opening new thread, and I hope that there doesn't already exist something like that.
I have one question, where can I follow when will Android 4.0 ICS come out for Samsung Galaxy Note N7000?
Thank you very much for help!
Best regards.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's a sticky thread as well in the General forum for ICS-related things. I'm not sure if that's what you're looking for:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1490986
Sorry I forgot to say.
Yes, I'm looking for official release.
Also follow Sammobile here:
http://www.sammobile.com/firmware/?page=3&t=1&o=1&m=GT-N7000&r=1#regiona
Thanks guys for answers!
look in the delevopement section every day, when you see 10 posts with "REAL ICS NOW" you know its been released
Xerwulf said:
look in the delevopement section every day, when you see 10 posts with "REAL ICS NOW" you know its been released
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Haha, good idea!
Another thing you can do is follow the Swedish android community Swedroid. They will for sure write when ICS comes for the Note.
http://www.swedroid.se
Sent from my GT-N7000 using Tapatalk
So i know the closest phone to ours in terms of hardware, is the Galaxy W right?
And guess what? They got the CM9 port this week.
So i guess this could help some developers to port it to our phone?
*_*
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1576874
Here's the link btw
i thought it has been mention a lot of times although same specs but it is not possible to port as the mobo is all different
Yeah, I'm not thinking on getting their rom and trying to install it on my phone.
I meant get their base and develop something similar on our phone, using the same cpu/gpu drivers, wich i think are the main problem we have right now.
I'm no developer, but i don't think that this is impossible.
Their original developer is porting it as we speak, so maybe we should continue the talk here ?
If dev is porting... new thread will open
Hereby thread closed!
Go arco. He brought CM7 to my old phone (htc wildfire) so it is just a matter of time until we have CM9 for our S+.
kurniawan77 said:
If dev is porting... new thread will open
Hereby thread closed!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol? its not close
kellermanv said:
Their original developer is porting it as we speak, so maybe we should continue the talk here ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where did you heard this?
Sent from my GT-I9001 using non premium xda app :'(
The porter is arco, look on yarde's cm7 development thread, he is trying to help us. ^^
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=24611096&postcount=523
kellermanv said:
The porter is arco, look on yarde's cm7 development thread, he is trying to help us. ^^
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showpost.php?p=24611096&postcount=523
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, but they are focused on CM7 and the released version for the Galaxy W is the CM9.
That's why i think it's a important release
projeto56 said:
Yeah, but they are focused on CM7 and the released version for the Galaxy W is the CM9.
That's why i think it's a important release
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you read the thread arco68 is talking about ics -->cm9
He is porting his version of CM9 dude, what's so hard to understand ?
u guys sound like a bunch of kids debating about who is gonna build a space shuttle , this thread should be closed and deleted from dev section.
Just like a kindergarden^^
Please read this and click the link in my signature. Thanks.
djdana said:
Did you read the thread arco68 is talking about ics -->cm9
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So, they are developing both CM7 and CM9?
I tought it was just the CM7.
Well, anyway we have something to base ourselves to make a port now
wintel_mac said:
Just like a kindergarden^^
Please read this and click the link in my signature. Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
damn I loooled so hard on ur sig...1`st time I saw it I was like wtf I`m not a fkin n00b then I stepped in and surprise surprise ... I`ve found that somehow I was a n00b ROFL and now it`s just fkin one of the awesome clips i`ve evah seen and yes I`m totally on the wrong forum ))))))))) I`m out for some p0rn now ))))))))))))
wintel_mac said:
Just like a kindergarden^^
Please read this and click the link in my signature. Thanks.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe i'm a noob. I'm not a develorper, but does it mean i shouldn't make part of this forum?
First of all, i've registered here not to create stuff, but to show my apreciation for the work of people who do create it.
I've donated to estimulate the development of other projects on other devices, but aparently people of the 9001 section don't actually care about this kind of user ( aka noobs).
And when i try to point that other developers managed to get CM9 on a phone that is very similar to ours you react that way? Seriously, you didn't became more of a man when you answered like a dickhead.
Anyway, i'm sorry for trying to help out the development of our device by bringing unharmful information.
C ya.
Your thread is in the wrong section. It should go into 9000 General section and the thread title should start with [9001]. That's the rules that were set up by XDA officials for us and our device. Not very handy but that's it.
This topic is not new and was discussed several times already in various other threads here. Ironically in the Cyanogenmod porting thread arco68, who ported CM9 for Galaxy W, has been around for two days and started to analyse out device. If you searched and read a bit, you would have found that. So this thread is a duplicate.
And thanks for the dickhead.
wintel_mac said:
Your thread is in the wrong section. It should go into 9000 General section and the thread title should start with [9001]. That's the rules that were set up by XDA officials for us and our device. Not very handy but that's it.
This topic is not new and was discussed several times already in various other threads here. Ironically in the Cyanogenmod porting thread arco68, who ported CM9 for Galaxy W, has been around for two days and started to analyse out device. If you searched and read a bit, you would have found that. So this thread is a duplicate.
And thanks for the dickhead.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Better than just calling me a noob right?
Why can't people answer this way to all users, no matter if they are developers or not?
Anyway just close/delete/purge/burn the damn thread
projeto56 said:
Maybe i'm a noob. I'm not a develorper, but does it mean i shouldn't make part of this forum?
First of all, i've registered here not to create stuff, but to show my apreciation for the work of people who do create it.
I've donated to estimulate the development of other projects on other devices, but aparently people of the 9001 section don't actually care about this kind of user ( aka noobs).
And when i try to point that other developers managed to get CM9 on a phone that is very similar to ours you react that way? Seriously, you didn't became more of a man when you answered like a dickhead.
Anyway, i'm sorry for trying to help out the development of our device by bringing unharmful information.
C ya.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can understand this reaction.
It's in my opinion the result of lacking our own general forum.
it's a shame that if i want to read topics in the general forum i have to use the search button to see i9001 topics.
When the Samsung Galaxy S Advance arrives does it get a subforum in the i9000 forum? if this is so this wil make things again more confusing.
And if there is a administrator then close this thread
But on topic there wil be a thread from arco68 ? about porting cm9.
squad your topic got closed and I don't want to spam your inbox. How could you delete your source? It can't be a too big file?
Verstuurd van mijn GT-S6500D met Tapatalk
It was quite disappointing ..
He was like "I don't have that phone anymore so I don't care anymore".
No I didn't mean to be like this, its just really disappointing ..
Posted via GT-S6500D using XDA Premium
engineerB_R said:
hi everybody, i am a newbie and I need 10 post
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
**** you dont spam just post useful stuff or get out
Verstuurd van mijn GT-S6500D met Tapatalk
^ Give some productive replies to threads, Instead of telling everyone you need 10 posts.
engineerB_R said:
hi everybody, i am a newbie and I need 10 post
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So, now that you have 10 posts, what you gonna do? Spam in dev? :/
engineerB_R said:
hi everybody, i am a newbie and I need 10 post
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
prezkfz007 said:
Even i need 10 posts!!
Sent from my GT-S5570 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Reported.
Ur useless posts will be deleted.
Hello,
I'm new to all these smartphone's tech but since I'm a Linux lover, who knows howto compile kernel with custom confing etc, I'd like to help with porting 4.1 Android to Galaxy Mini 2, but first I'll have to sort some things out....
Anyway, as I have seen so far, squadzone been working for some time with s6500 and he produced custom kernel for 2.3 android, which OC'd CPU from 800mhz to 1,1 Ghz....and I'm thinking, do we really need sources from squadzone? Perhaps we should start from scratch, firstly looking for some NFO at http: // source.android.com/source/building-kernels.html
Second, I'm aware lots of these "modds" are not being released under any kind of opensource. What I mean is, can we trust these modds? Having a botnet with smartphones would be an good idea.... but NVM.
If u guys wanna make some mods/porting/etc please try to make it opensource at the beginning of project. No putting hidden/unknown code.
BTW, what about maclaw? He have been working on galaxy mini afaik, he might have some experience in this field?
Just a thought
Cheers
varcon said:
Hello,
I'm new to all these smartphone's tech but since I'm a Linux lover, who knows howto compile kernel with custom confing etc, I'd like to help with porting 4.1 Android to Galaxy Mini 2, but first I'll have to sort some things out....
Anyway, as I have seen so far, squadzone been working for some time with s6500 and he produced custom kernel for 2.3 android, which OC'd CPU from 800mhz to 1,1 Ghz....and I'm thinking, do we really need sources from squadzone? Perhaps we should start from scratch, firstly looking for some NFO at http: // source.android.com/source/building-kernels.html
Second, I'm aware lots of these "modds" are not being released under any kind of opensource. What I mean is, can we trust these modds? Having a botnet with smartphones would be an good idea.... but NVM.
If u guys wanna make some mods/porting/etc please try to make it opensource at the beginning of project. No putting hidden/unknown code.
BTW, what about maclaw? He have been working on galaxy mini afaik, he might have some experience in this field?
Just a thought
Cheers
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I ask you to get involved in the DEV thread and help trybicki14 & TheWhisp in making CyanogenMod 10 - Jelly Bean. :good:
tip: We don't need OpenMax driver because we have armv7
teocelinscak said:
I ask you to get involved in the DEV thread and help trybicki14 & TheWhisp in making CyanogenMod 10 - Jelly Bean. :good:
tip: We don't need OpenMax driver because we have armv7
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hope it will be come true, jena with jelly
i fell disappointed with gingger stuck, no official update for upgrade to ics or jellybean.
U guys will be better off without maclaw.
Hi, i'm a new member of the forums but i have been cheking the youtube channel and also used the forum to root my device and also to install some custom roms in it.
I'm currently using CM 10.1.6 modded and it works perfectly and very smooth
so first of all thx to those guys http://forum.xda-developers.com/show....php?t=2212438
second, i would like to know if we, the cooper users are we going to have 4.4 on our devices anytime soon? i dont know if that is even possible; maybe the fact that we are already able to run 4.2.2 is big step. However; kitkat will be us a performance increase? is it gonna use less ram for exaple (the s5830 really lacks on that point)
thx
(I'm pretty suprised about all the anti spam security measures that this forum has, i have never seen something similar)
SinTonNiSon said:
Hi, i'm a new member of the forums but i have been cheking the youtube channel and also used the forum to root my device and also to install some custom roms in it.
I'm currently using CM 10.1.6 modded and it works perfectly and very smooth
so first of all thx to those guys http://forum.xda-developers.com/show....php?t=2212438
second, i would like to know if we, the cooper users are we going to have 4.4 on our devices anytime soon? i dont know if that is even possible; maybe the fact that we are already able to run 4.2.2 is big step. However; kitkat will be us a performance increase? is it gonna use less ram for exaple (the s5830 really lacks on that point)
thx
(I'm pretty suprised about all the anti spam security measures that this forum has, i have never seen something similar)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kikat should run on ace better than JB. Also maclaw is working for the same on our device so don't get surprised to see a new build soon
The Wolverine1800 said:
Kikat should run on ace better than JB. Also maclaw is working for the same on our device so don't get surprised to see a new build soon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that will be soooo cool man
The Wolverine1800 said:
Kikat should run on ace better than JB. Also maclaw is working for the same on our device so don't get surprised to see a new build soon
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
can you link the post where you read that? i would like to to be informed about that
SinTonNiSon said:
can you link the post where you read that? i would like to to be informed about that
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maclaw posted on his fb wall that there would a release soon. He later told that he was working on cm11
AFAIK, maclaw is planning to release a new kernel. Would be nice to see a CM11, though I am a little reserved regarding it
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Yesterday he confirmed that he is working on CM11 for Ace. We should just give MAclaw some time. I know, I hate him too
i have just seen his troll video about kitkat, seems close hehe
Best to discuss kitkat here. Keep it in one thread
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=47930831
Sent from my Sony Tablet S using xda app-developers app
jumper62 is right! aham, PLEASE DON'T OPEN NEW THREAD THAT ALREADY EXIST
NEW MEMBERS SHOULD READ RULES BEFORE POSTING NOTHING
We need to keep clean Gerenal Thread
To ask for questions use Q&A THREAD PLEASE!!
Thank you for understandig it
REPORTED
Mod Edit
Duplicate thread is duplicate.
Thread closed
malybru
Forum Moderator
hi there,
well, i have been using this phone almost for 2 years, and the only thing that i want to know is:
is there a rom based on android 4.2.2 jellybean for this device??
or any way to get jellybean work on this phone?
cuz i cant use some apps on ics.
hope anyone reply soon.:good:
There is a guy that is making a port of lineage os. its easy to search it :v
rodrigo151515151515151 said:
There is a guy that is making a port of lineage os. its easy to search it :v
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sigh. Don't reply anymore to this. I already moved on from this device.. and it has been 4 long years and also this device is deprecated and obsolete.
Answering old posts is useful
RyuukenZenkou said:
Sigh. Don't reply anymore to this. I already moved on from this device.. and it has been 4 long years and also this device is deprecated and obsolete.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Answering old questions is useful because if someone's else than OP needs an answer, you can leave it there. Anyway yes, this is a pretty obsolete device.