Want to purchase new One; purple camera question - One (M7) Q&A, Help & Troubleshooting

I am looking into buying a new HTC One but, before selling my S4, I want to know if all One's are plagued by the Purple Hue camera issues?
Is there a way of checking this before buying?

b0gd4n said:
I am looking into buying a new HTC One but, before selling my S4, I want to know if all One's are plagued by the Purple Hue camera issues?
Is there a way of checking this before buying?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
not all One, I have an early model and did not experienced this issue at all. Check to buy a newer model (refer to s/n #). Newer models comes with Omni Vision or Sharp cameras that are supposed to be ok.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2209277
you might found more information in this thread

b0gd4n said:
I am looking into buying a new HTC One but, before selling my S4, I want to know if all One's are plagued by the Purple Hue camera issues?
Is there a way of checking this before buying?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
well, most of the older batch is
I have the Red One purchased in September. It was a victim. I believe this issue has been corrected in the newer batches

I have a blue one. Got it 3 weeks ago...cameras great.
Sent from my HTC One using XDA Premium HD app

Thanks for the info.

alray said:
not all One, I have an early model and did not experienced this issue at all. Check to buy a newer model (refer to s/n #). Newer models comes with Omni Vision or Sharp cameras that are supposed to be ok.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2209277
you might found more information in this thread
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
raghav kapur said:
well, most of the older batch is
I have the Red One purchased in September. It was a victim. I believe this issue has been corrected in the newer batches
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
around what time should the phone have been produced so it would have the new camera modules installed?

b0gd4n said:
around what time should the phone have been produced so it would have the new camera modules installed?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Around November-December

raghav kapur said:
Around November-December
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so if it before Nov I should not buy it then?
Is it guaranteed that all phones before Nov are plagued with the camera issues?

b0gd4n said:
so if it before Nov I should not buy it then?
Is it guaranteed that all phones before Nov are plagued with the camera issues?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, but there's quite a high chance on the pre-November phones.
Just FYI, I bought mine in October. It was pre-installed with 4.2.2. On the second day, the camera was PERFECT. I don't frequently use the camera, particularly in low light. But a month later, this issue was, well BAD. When I first noticed this issue, I already got the 4.3 update. I think the 4.3 update intensified this issue. I've only flashed 4.3 and 4.4 ROMs, so im not sure whether these updates aggrevated the problem. Currently, mine is in the service centre. Once its back, ill notify you with the improvements.

b0gd4n said:
so if it before Nov I should not buy it then?
Is it guaranteed that all phones before Nov are plagued with the camera issues?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just buy nov/dec, because the ones before have the purple tint with the ST Microelectronics module, the nov/dec are Sharp modules(the best by far) and then jan onwards they've been using omnivision modules without Optical image stabilisation and with comparatively poor low light performance.
Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk

n1234d said:
Just buy nov/dec, because the ones before have the purple tint with the ST Microelectronics module, the nov/dec are Sharp modules(the best by far) and then jan onwards they've been using omnivision modules without Optical image stabilisation and with comparatively poor low light performance.
Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Where does it say the omni sensor doesn't have OIS?
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk

n1234d said:
Just buy nov/dec, because the ones before have the purple tint with the ST Microelectronics module, the nov/dec are Sharp modules(the best by far) and then jan onwards they've been using omnivision modules without Optical image stabilisation and with comparatively poor low light performance.
Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
so the jan ones are actually worse than nov/dec?

gustav30 said:
Where does it say the omni sensor doesn't have OIS?
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://www.ovt.com/products/sensor.php?id=130
^ This is the sensor used. In the description it says Electronic Image Stabilization
b0gd4n said:
so the jan ones are actually worse than nov/dec?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm just saying that it's best if you get the Sharp module. ST WILL give you pink tint, later if not sooner, and Jan ones don't have OIS, which will hinder your ability to take super-quick, sharp shots while moving. You can make your choice. I'd go with Nov-Dec. Better go to a retail shop and see the serial no. Look for HT3B/HT3C (or any other alphabets like FA, SH etc before the same numbers) 3 indicates 2013, B=Nov, C=Dec (Hex)

n1234d said:
http://www.ovt.com/products/sensor.php?id=130
^ This is the sensor used. In the description it says Electronic Image Stabilization
I've had both sensors(just got an omni ov as I was plagued by purple tint), as far as stabilization is concerned, I honestly can't tell a difference between the original ST and the Omni. Using the Omni OV now, as far as taking pics and videos of my daughter who is constantly running around, there is no more shakiness present than before.
I haven't read the difference of the stabilization techniques, but for me the Omni is fine.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

gustav30 said:
n1234d said:
http://www.ovt.com/products/sensor.php?id=130
^ This is the sensor used. In the description it says Electronic Image Stabilization
I've had both sensors(just got an omni ov as I was plagued by purple tint), as far as stabilization is concerned, I honestly can't tell a difference between the original ST and the Omni. Using the Omni OV now, as far as taking pics and videos of my daughter who is constantly running around, there is no more shakiness present than before.
I haven't read the difference of the stabilization techniques, but for me the Omni is fine.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can I see your sensor data? Located in /sys/android_camera/sensor
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

n1234d said:
gustav30 said:
Can I see your sensor data? Located in /sys/android_camera/sensor
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Also, the Butterfly S, One mini, and Max, all uses the same sensors as the One, but I believe they don't didn't have any form of stabilization in those phones, so it leads me to believe the OIS is controlled not in the sensor itself. But I'm just guessing here. Attached is my sensor.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

gustav30 said:
n1234d said:
View attachment 2609492
Also, the Butterfly S, One mini, and Max, all uses the same sensors as the One, but I believe they don't didn't have any form of stabilization in those phones, so it leads me to believe the OIS is controlled not in the sensor itself. But I'm just guessing here. Attached is my sensor.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you do one thing for me? Can you start the camera, then flip your phone over, and watch the camera carefully, while gently jerking your phone. Does the main round sensor inside move slightly for a few milliseconds (don't worry, it's noticeable) to accommodate this movement? If it does, then HTC is using a special OV4688, tailor made for their own needs, which is very unlikely. Otherwise, this is my conviction: do the One Mini, Max, Butterfly S have the pink tint problem? No. Did they ever have any problem? No. Does any of them have OIS? No. My conclusion is that all use the OV4688 sensor with EIS, and maybe you mightn't have noticed, because OIS helps capturing sharp images for those who don't have a steady hand, or when the camera is moving, not the subject, so speed of the subject wouldn't matter. Just in case, I'll go over to the One mini forum and ask someone to post their sensor data.
Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

n1234d said:
http://www.ovt.com/products/sensor.php?id=130
^ This is the sensor used. In the description it says Electronic Image Stabilization
I'm just saying that it's best if you get the Sharp module. ST WILL give you pink tint, later if not sooner, and Jan ones don't have OIS, which will hinder your ability to take super-quick, sharp shots while moving. You can make your choice. I'd go with Nov-Dec. Better go to a retail shop and see the serial no. Look for HT3B/HT3C (or any other alphabets like FA, SH etc before the same numbers) 3 indicates 2013, B=Nov, C=Dec (Hex)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
OK then, I will try and find a 3B/3C. Thanks!
PS: found a 3AZ, so 31st Oct. Would this be OK?

b0gd4n said:
OK then, I will try and find a 3A/3B. Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem please use the thanks button if I helped
Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk

n1234d said:
gustav30 said:
Can you do one thing for me? Can you start the camera, then flip your phone over, and watch the camera carefully, while gently jerking your phone. Does the main round sensor inside move slightly for a few milliseconds (don't worry, it's noticeable) to accommodate this movement? If it does, then HTC is using a special OV4688, tailor made for their own needs, which is very unlikely. Otherwise, this is my conviction: do the One Mini, Max, Butterfly S have the pink tint problem? No. Did they ever have any problem? No. Does any of them have OIS? No. My conclusion is that all use the OV4688 sensor with EIS, and maybe you mightn't have noticed, because OIS helps capturing sharp images for those who don't have a steady hand, or when the camera is moving, not the subject, so speed of the subject wouldn't matter. Just in case, I'll go over to the One mini forum and ask someone to post their sensor data.
Sent from my iPod touch using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Weird, I asked in the Max thread, and one reply was the ST sensor. The vd6869.
Here is the link:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=50762994
I think the tint problem at least for me was related to heat and improper shielding.
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse

Related

That Awesome Moment When You First Turn On the Screen

Was blown away. Felt like just writing it. Whoa. What a screen. The colours, the clarity! Am disappointed that some app icons look meh, but that's the devs' problem really, hope they put some effort soon, like they did with Facebook Messenger.
I regularly deliver to lg head office and went in yesterday. I saw the g2 and nexus. Well impressed. If only the nexus has a 5.5 inch screen id buy it
Sent from my GT-N7105 using xda app-developers app
thedadio said:
I regularly deliver to lg head office and went in yesterday. I saw the g2 and nexus. Well impressed. If only the nexus has a 5.5 inch screen id buy it
Sent from my GT-N7105 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh I'd still go for it! just a .6.
This is kind of an understated spec on this phone, at least here. Some online reviews point out it's greatness. I for one think it is by far the nicest looking screen I've ever seen on a cell phone. It really makes amoled look bad. Really bad. Imo
Sent from my Nexus 7 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
jbdan said:
This is kind of an understated spec on this phone, at least here. Some online reviews point out it's greatness. I for one think it is by far the nicest looking screen I've ever seen on a cell phone. It really makes amoled look bad. Really bad. Imo
Sent from my Nexus 7 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Aside from the HTC one I completely agree.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Screen is great provided you got one without dead pixels!
Also been reading about the yellow tint but I've either not got it on mine or don't notice it.
jackpf said:
Screen is great provided you got one without dead pixels!
Also been reading about the yellow tint but I've either not got it on mine or don't notice it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dead pixels? Ugh, that must suck. Have you tried contacting Google?
The screen actually hurt my eyes initially lol. Trying to get used to it and no i don't wear glasses I got 20/15 vision. I guess I'm way too used to Amoled screens.
You ppl are over exaggerating the screen looks good but it is poorly calibrated. I cant wait for Paranoid Android to drop their rom with their display enhancements like they did with the nexus 4
chrisnk204 said:
You ppl are over exaggerating the screen looks good but it is poorly calibrated. I cant wait for Paranoid Android to drop their rom with their display enhancements like they did with the nexus 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Screen is beautiful especially with Franco kernel and Cataclysm rom but like i said my eyes have to adjust because it hurts using the screen. Too many years of AMOLED.
At first I thought you were being ironic.
The screen is not that good, it lacks contrast and has very bad viewing angles.
If viewed from an angle you'll see the white from retroillumination, the more the angle, the more the white and the loss of contrast.
You should put this side by side with a G2. That is a beautiful screen.
By the way, if you look closely under direct sunlight you'll see a pattern of thin lines, I suppose it's the digitizer. Does anyone know why it is visible in this phone while it isn't on others
chk27 said:
By the way, if you look closely under direct sunlight you'll see a pattern of thin lines, I suppose it's the digitizer. Does anyone know why it is visible in this phone while it isn't on others
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've actually seen that on a number of phones. The Optimus G comes to mind.
owendesira said:
Dead pixels? Ugh, that must suck. Have you tried contacting Google?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah I've got a replacement on the way. Annoying because I find my device perfect in every other way
chk27 said:
At first I thought you were being ironic.
The screen is not that good, it lacks contrast and has very bad viewing angles.
If viewed from an angle you'll see the white from retroillumination, the more the angle, the more the white and the loss of contrast.
You should put this side by side with a G2. That is a beautiful screen.
By the way, if you look closely under direct sunlight you'll see a pattern of thin lines, I suppose it's the digitizer. Does anyone know why it is visible in this phone while it isn't on others
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But, the G2 and N5 both have the same screen. Just the g2 is bigger.
G2: 5.2" IPS LCD 1920x1080 (424 ppi)
Nexus 5: 4.95" IPS LCD with Corning Gorilla Glass 3
1080×1920 (445 ppi)
I don't understand how there could be any difference in what are (apart from the diagonal size) exactly the same screens. :S
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
pardoned said:
But, the G2 and N5 both have the same screen. Just the g2 is bigger.
G2: 5.2" IPS LCD 1920x1080 (424 ppi)
Nexus 5: 4.95" IPS LCD with Corning Gorilla Glass 3
1080×1920 (445 ppi)
I don't understand how there could be any difference in what are (apart from the diagonal size) exactly the same screens. :S
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just because they have the same resolution and underlying technology (IPS LCD) doesn't mean that they're the same panel.
chrisnk204 said:
You ppl are over exaggerating the screen looks good but it is poorly calibrated. I cant wait for Paranoid Android to drop their rom with their display enhancements like they did with the nexus 4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No over exaggeration here. And you're wrong. It's very accurately color calibrated. So much so that there are a couple reviews on it reiterating this and the fact it is the most accurately color calibrated screens they've ever reviewed . If you are talking about contrast, that's another can of worms.....
Sent from my Nexus 7 using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
chk27 said:
At first I thought you were being ironic.
The screen is not that good, it lacks contrast and has very bad viewing angles.
If viewed from an angle you'll see the white from retroillumination, the more the angle, the more the white and the loss of contrast.
You should put this side by side with a G2. That is a beautiful screen.
By the way, if you look closely under direct sunlight you'll see a pattern of thin lines, I suppose it's the digitizer. Does anyone know why it is visible in this phone while it isn't on others
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Oh I had those on my N4, The lines can appear on some phones more than on others of the same model. Can be kinda annoying, I agree.
jackpf said:
Yeah I've got a replacement on the way. Annoying because I find my device perfect in every other way
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mhm, hope you get your replacement soon!
Lines or dots, all screens show it in sunlight and it is the digitizer. The screens are designed to be looked at straight on or to perform best for 99% of the time. If you want a screen that has over 450 cdm brightness, 4000:1 contrast ratio with .1 cdm black level, 180 degree viewing angles and any sort of energy consumption efficiency then you are welcome to pay $500+ just for the panel. Stop complaining!

[Q] Camera Focus

I do have the camera update installed. I have tried other camera apps including Camera Zoom and Shot Control.
Is anyone else having ridiculous problems with focusing--usually in macro situations? It's very frustrating and, frankly, embarrassing that the camera focuses so poorly. I often have to move the focus reticle around multiple times, reframe my shot, or just give up on trying to capture a focus in most macro situations (such as when I want to grab focus on an object real close and have the background blur out). I had no problems with this on my Gnex.
I just bought my Moto X over the Thanksgiving holiday and didn't know what the camera was like before the camera update, but I couldn't imagine it being worse than what I'm experiencing with it right now.
Here are two example photos of a gnome sitting a respectable 4-6" away from my camera. I found that if I moved the focus reticle onto the blue sleeve, it captured focus very well. However, if I tried to focus on the face or just brought the camera up to the gnome in a "real life situation", it wouldn't focus even after multiple movements of the focus reticle.
Then put the focus on the blue arm part. Problem solved.
natezire71 said:
Then put the focus on the blue arm part. Problem solved.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lol.
Sendt fra min Nexus 7 med Tapatalk 4
I tested the camera outside of my room and it's fine. Thanks for the tip. Plus there is the new camera update.
mrsonsai said:
I tested the camera outside of my room and it's fine. Thanks for the tip. Plus there is the new camera update.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's the trick to get it to focus on close objects in other apps? I cannot get barcodes to scan in the Amazon app because they are out of focus when they are close enough to be big enough.
poorgrad said:
What's the trick to get it to focus on close objects in other apps? I cannot get barcodes to scan in the Amazon app because they are out of focus when they are close enough to be big enough.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
honestly I'm not sure. It just sort of seemed to work when I used it outside of my bedroom. Maybe try it in a different light?
Camera focus
I also tested the camera outside of my room and it's working fine.:good:
I've had a number of issues with focusing as well, especially in macro. You can try turning on the manual focus control and having it focus on your subject which seems to help in most cases. However I have had a number of times where the camera just won't focus at all unless I move it to another point and then back to the original photo. It hasn't happened a ton but I have had it happen enough to notice it.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
termleech said:
I've had a number of issues with focusing as well, especially in macro. You can try turning on the manual focus control and having it focus on your subject which seems to help in most cases. However I have had a number of times where the camera just won't focus at all unless I move it to another point and then back to the original photo. It hasn't happened a ton but I have had it happen enough to notice it.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk HD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have this same problem as well. I have a republic wireless one that didnt get the kit kat update yet, and i'm dying for the big camera update in the hopes that it will save me.
the only good thing about an iphone is the flawless camera. otherwise, my moto x just plain rules.
Decided to do a micro-focus comparison vs my S2, here's a sample of both focusing as close as they can on my computer monitor. The best image from each was selected:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
I'll let you guess which is which.
I know it's not apples-to-apples (this isn't the same type of problem) but the camera definitely has some serious issues.
mrsonsai said:
I do have the camera update installed. I have tried other camera apps including Camera Zoom and Shot Control.
Is anyone else having ridiculous problems with focusing--usually in macro situations? It's very frustrating and, frankly, embarrassing that the camera focuses so poorly. I often have to move the focus reticle around multiple times, reframe my shot, or just give up on trying to capture a focus in most macro situations (such as when I want to grab focus on an object real close and have the background blur out). I had no problems with this on my Gnex.
I just bought my Moto X over the Thanksgiving holiday and didn't know what the camera was like before the camera update, but I couldn't imagine it being worse than what I'm experiencing with it right now.
Here are two example photos of a gnome sitting a respectable 4-6" away from my camera. I found that if I moved the focus reticle onto the blue sleeve, it captured focus very well. However, if I tried to focus on the face or just brought the camera up to the gnome in a "real life situation", it wouldn't focus even after multiple movements of the focus reticle.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Download the app "Camera JB+" from the Play Store and all your problems are solved. I think it's 1.99.
Speaking of the horrible camera on this phone does anyone get bad flash glares in their photos while using flash?? I swear this phone would be perfect if it at least had a gs3 quality camera.
Auto focus uses contrast measurement between lines of the sample area. If the area you're trying to focus on has little contrast, especially in low light, it will have a difficult time trying to focus.
Eckyx said:
Decided to do a micro-focus comparison vs my S2, here's a sample of both focusing as close as they can on my computer monitor. The best image from each was selected:
I'll let you guess which is which.
I know it's not apples-to-apples (this isn't the same type of problem) but the camera definitely has some serious issues.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have an s2...And now a Moto x...not sure about you...But my x's camera blows my s2 away really.
Sent from my Moto X cell phone telephone.....
kj2112 said:
I have an s2...And now a Moto x...not sure about you...But my x's camera blows my s2 away really.
Sent from my Moto X cell phone telephone.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Check out this thread I posted a bit ago, did a comparison between the cameras side-by-side:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2550110
Eckyx said:
Check out this thread I posted a bit ago, did a comparison between the cameras side-by-side:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2550110
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's your phones....And your picture taking techniques.....right?
I'm using fv-5, not stock app....And again...my Moto x blows my s2 away. My wife agrees.
Does it compare to my cheap 150 dollar Sony camera's pictures....nope. And no phone will.
Sent from my Moto X cell phone telephone.....
---------- Post added at 03:06 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:03 PM ----------
Check the pictures thread to see what people have taken. Probably people who have spent time working on their technique with this phone....But some great pics in there.
Sent from my Moto X cell phone telephone.....
kj2112 said:
I have an s2...And now a Moto x...not sure about you...But my x's camera blows my s2 away really.
Sent from my Moto X cell phone telephone.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
kj2112 said:
That's your phones....And your picture taking techniques.....right?
I'm using fv-5, not stock app....And again...my Moto x blows my s2 away. My wife agrees.
Does it compare to my cheap 150 dollar Sony camera's pictures....nope. And no phone will.
Sent from my Moto X cell phone telephone.....
---------- Post added at 03:06 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:03 PM ----------
Check the pictures thread to see what people have taken. Probably people who have spent time working on their technique with this phone....But some great pics in there.
Sent from my Moto X cell phone telephone.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I'm using the latest update to the stock camera on the Moto X, and the stock camera app on the S2, both using stock settings. I retook pictures several times to prevent blurry shots. The Moto is definitely better indoors but outdoor performance is equal at best to the older module used in the S2. I'd be happy to purchase FV-5 and do a comparison using that if you'd like - what kind of technique am I supposed to have with a cellphone camera that has basically no controls or options? It's not like a DSLR - pretty much as point-and-shoot as you can get.
Eckyx said:
Yes, I'm using the latest update to the stock camera on the Moto X, and the stock camera app on the S2, both using stock settings. I retook pictures several times to prevent blurry shots. The Moto is definitely better indoors but outdoor performance is equal at best to the older module used in the S2. I'd be happy to purchase FV-5 and do a comparison using that if you'd like - what kind of technique am I supposed to have with a cellphone camera that has basically no controls or options? It's not like a DSLR - pretty much as point-and-shoot as you can get.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fv-5 let's you control everything...or just point and shoot too. Yes....it takes time to learn what to change and when....But it can do much more than stock. Someone who is into photography on a real camera....not a phone....would probably learn quick how to get the most out of our crappy phone cameras with fv-5.
Or a similar app....that's just the one I read about and bought.
Sent from my Moto X cell phone telephone.....

[Q] Moto X camera question

Hi All,
I've got my Moto X and I really love it. I previously had a Nexus 5 which I liked, but doesn't have much character compared to the X. The only issue I've got is camera quality. It seems insanely poor (and the N5 wasn't exactly great). One thing I've been doing though is using Google's stock camera app rather than Moto's. Is that a mistake? Is there software optimisation in the Moto camera app which gives better results?
Any other tips and getting the best pics? It's not even just low light. I took a pic on a bright day and the picture was totally washed out (my friend took the same pic on his iphone and it was just another league). All pics just seem to have bad light metering and are very noisy. I've never had this in a phone camera before...
Thanks in advance...
tifosi256 said:
Hi All,
I've got my Moto X and I really love it. I previously had a Nexus 5 which I liked, but doesn't have much character compared to the X. The only issue I've got is camera quality. It seems insanely poor (and the N5 wasn't exactly great). One thing I've been doing though is using Google's stock camera app rather than Moto's. Is that a mistake? Is there software optimisation in the Moto camera app which gives better results?
Any other tips and getting the best pics? It's not even just low light. I took a pic on a bright day and the picture was totally washed out (my friend took the same pic on his iphone and it was just another league). All pics just seem to have bad light metering and are very noisy. I've never had this in a phone camera before...
Thanks in advance...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't have any answers but I'm hoping there are some fixes released soon, either by motonovo themselves or some industrious xda mods
I don't think any software mods are going to improve the camera much on our Moto X 2014's. Seems Motorola used an oldish camera sensor in this device. Some people are even saying this camera shouldn't have been used in a 2014 flagship. So we have 2 choices - Put up with it or get a phone with a better camera.
Diesel779 said:
I don't think any software mods are going to improve the camera much on our Moto X 2014's. Seems Motorola used an oldish camera sensor in this device. Some people are even saying this camera shouldn't have been used in a 2014 flagship. So we have 2 choices - Put up with it or get a phone with a better camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wow, that's really depressing to hear :crying:
I knew before buying that it wasn't the best camera, but it seems to be the worst I've had since the nexus 4. Seems Motorola like to clear inventory of old stock (see the moto 360 hardware)
tifosi256 said:
Wow, that's really depressing to hear :crying:
I knew before buying that it wasn't the best camera, but it seems to be the worst I've had since the nexus 4. Seems Motorola like to clear inventory of old stock (see the moto 360 hardware)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I expected more from a 13mp camera. I'm considering switching to a Nexus 6, but I really like my Moto X apart from the camera.
Diesel779 said:
I don't think any software mods are going to improve the camera much on our Moto X 2014's. Seems Motorola used an oldish camera sensor in this device. Some people are even saying this camera shouldn't have been used in a 2014 flagship. So we have 2 choices - Put up with it or get a phone with a better camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's the same sensor as the g3..
robstunner said:
It's the same sensor as the g3..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If that's the case, it must be the lens or software. The G3 has a very nice camera.
robstunner said:
It's the same sensor as the g3..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The Moto X 2014 is the same sensor as the G3? Are you sure? But, even if that is true, the G3 has OIS and laser auto focus and other improvements. But I'm pretty sure the G3 uses a slightly newer sensor. The pics on my G3 weren't bad, not great but ok. However, they were a LOT better than on my Moto X 2014, this camera is a joke.
:
---------- Post added at 03:20 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:16 PM ----------
tifosi256 said:
If that's the case, it must be the lens or software. The G3 has a very nice camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm almost certain they use different sensors, I could be wrong. The G3 has OIS and laser auto focus. The camera on the G3 is significantly better than the Moto X 2014, I've owned both. There seems to be a lot of people complaining about the camera o the Moto X, but no one doing the same for the G3. If they used the same cameras I wouldn't expect that to be the case.
---------- Post added at 03:22 PM ---------- Previous post was at 03:20 PM ----------
robstunner said:
It's the same sensor as the g3..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you got any links that state the Moto X 2014 uses the same camera as the G3? The G3 could just be better because of it's extra hardware i.e OIS and laser autofocus, but I'd still be interested in seeing a link stating these devices have the exact same camera.
Right in the middle there.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Yes this camera blows. I had a S5 then a Note Edge. I love this phone way more than either of those but omg this thing has a crap camera
Both camera's (g3/moto x) have the same Sony IMX135, only the g2/3 (both the same sensor) have OIS and apparently better software. Compared to the lg g2 the moto x sucks donkey balls.
It does help to use other camera apps.
robstunner said:
Right in the middle there.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just goes to show how much difference OIS and laser auto focus make, because the camera on the Moto X 2014 performs nowhere near as good as the G3. I'm just going to stick with this phone now until the HTC M9 is released. I loved my M8 but the camera and how tall and skinny it was led me to sell it. I'll definitely be switching to the M9 though if HTC use a better camera.
Diesel779 said:
Just goes to show how much difference OIS and laser auto focus make, because the camera on the Moto X 2014 performs nowhere near as good as the G3. I'm just going to stick with this phone now until the HTC M9 is released. I loved my M8 but the camera and how tall and skinny it was led me to sell it. I'll definitely be switching to the M9 though if HTC use a better camera.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
more like software and optics, but ya i agree. I think the m8 camera holds it's own against the moto x, especially in low light.
robstunner said:
more like software and optics, but ya i agree. I think the m8 camera holds it's own against the moto x, especially in low light.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm just looking at an M8, I think I'd be stupid to get another M8 now though with the M9 around the corner. OIS has to help with the G3 camera and that laser auto focus is good. My G3 just kept overheating though, and after a google search it seemed to be a pretty common problem so I got rid of it. I was considering the Nexus 6, but like I say - I think I'll just stick with the Moto X 2014 until the M9 is released.
Edit to add: With the huge difference in picture quality from the Moto X 2014 and the G3 its more than just software that's creating the difference.
Taken inside an olive garden.... I feel like my note 2 was twice as good.
Yeah, that's pretty typical of a Moto X shot indoors
Well, someone has suggested the camera app might make a difference so I'll use the moto one for a bit and see. The focussing seems OK, so the lack of laser focussing isn't doing this. It has to be optics or software.
When looking at this phone, I kept hearing how Moto had listened to users and improved since the first X, so I assumed that would mean it would be OK. But they either lied, or the old X had a horrifically bad camera
tifosi256 said:
Hi All,
I've got my Moto X and I really love it. I previously had a Nexus 5 which I liked, but doesn't have much character compared to the X. The only issue I've got is camera quality. It seems insanely poor (and the N5 wasn't exactly great). One thing I've been doing though is using Google's stock camera app rather than Moto's. Is that a mistake? Is there software optimisation in the Moto camera app which gives better results?
Any other tips and getting the best pics? It's not even just low light. I took a pic on a bright day and the picture was totally washed out (my friend took the same pic on his iphone and it was just another league). All pics just seem to have bad light metering and are very noisy. I've never had this in a phone camera before...
Thanks in advance...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What are you on about? I find the Moto x rear camera quite decent. The front camera is pathetic in low light conditions, can barely refresh the view finder once a second. But the rear camera is quite good to be honest. Here's a couple of samples I took with it.
manrock said:
What are you on about? I find the Moto x rear camera quite decent. The front camera is pathetic in low light conditions, can barely refresh the view finder once a second. But the rear camera is quite good to be honest. Here's a couple of samples I took with it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
These two shots were taken within seconds of each other. This is a horrible camera. I love this phone, but this honestly might be a deal breaker for me. Kinda hurts to say that because I fell in love with the device immediately. My only option is a Oneplus and I really don’t want to deal with their dumb ordering process.
TigerDNA said:
These two shots were taken within seconds of each other. This is a horrible camera. I love this phone, but this honestly might be a deal breaker for me. Kinda hurts to say that because I fell in love with the device immediately. My only option is a Oneplus and I really don’t want to deal with their dumb ordering process.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Maybe installing this will help.. This is a modded version of the stock camera app called Camera+. Loaded with advanced settings. Slide open the settings and click the ladybug icon to access them.
http://www.mediafire.com/download/wxa1xu00onp4mwv/MotCamera+_3.3.20.8.apk
Happy tinkering
manrock said:
Maybe installing this will help.. This is a modded version of the stock camera app called Camera+. Loaded with advanced settings. Slide open the settings and click the ladybug icon to access them.
http://www.mediafire.com/download/wxa1xu00onp4mwv/MotCamera+_3.3.20.8.apk
Happy tinkering
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, you've piqued my interest. Is this the thread you grabbed the link from?

very poor photos quality after a year?

I wasn't using camera much so I'm not even sure when did it start but now, after a year of use, the photos quality is very poor.
That's what I get on a clear sunny day -
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
The phone never was unlocked and always had a latest standard software.
Does anyone else get that and what can be done?
Thanks
Is the camera lens visibly blurry ?
madd0g said:
Is the camera lens visibly blurry ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No, it looks clean.
regcoll said:
No, it looks clean.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
did you zoom out in the 2nd photo? try also not to take pictures in front of the sun or a bright light, it can affect the picture quality as the light will fed up the sensor too much, which will result the 1st photo. you can adjust in by soft press the camera button. you'll notice that it will focus first and enhancing the view, then hard press it so it will take the picture. Try to post also some other samples from different views and angles. it's odd since Z3c has a good camera quality, you just have to utilized it
this is how the pictures always looked try to use manual mode you won't see big different bet u can make it a little bit better
Samples
Hi Guys!
I just want to share with you my photos captured using stock and a slim ROM
yoorie016 said:
try also not to take pictures in front of the sun or a bright light, it can affect the picture quality as the light will fed up the sensor too much, which will result the 1st photo. you can adjust in by soft press the camera button.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you suggesting it's normal? I don't think so... I expect better from this phone.
The problem is it's hard to measure the quality but it just doesn't look right.
Attached 2 photos I took just now, one with main camera and another with front camera.
The main camera result looks all fogy...
regcoll said:
Are you suggesting it's normal? I don't think so... I expect better from this phone.
The problem is it's hard to measure the quality but it just doesn't look right.
Attached 2 photos I took just now, one with main camera and another with front camera.
The main camera result looks all fogy...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi Bro,
What normal is when you point your camera directly on a bright light, which the sensor will fed up too much light and it will not handle too much light. That was happen on your 1st photo from the post.
But after seeing these pictures, i think you have a problem with your lens which is not so normal. Does this happens also when recording a video using the main camera? Here's mine that i shot just earlier using the main and back respectively.
yoorie016 said:
But after seeing these pictures, i think you have a problem with your lens which is not so normal.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, looks like that's the problem.
yoorie016 said:
What normal is when you point your camera directly on a bright light, which the sensor will fed up too much light and it will not handle too much light. That was happen on your 1st photo from the post.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, but in my case it's happens all the time, maybe the dust on the lens interferes with the light.
Anyway, I'll try to get Sony to fix it
regcoll said:
Yes, looks like that's the problem.
Yes, but in my case it's happens all the time, maybe the dust on the lens interferes with the light.
Anyway, I'll try to get Sony to fix it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have any phone case or plastic installed on your phone?
yoorie016 said:
Do you have any phone case or plastic installed on your phone?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
no
I have a feeling it's just dust...
looking at my photos for a year, it seems to be happening slowly
so much for dust resistance
but still - it's hard to measure so hard to say when and how it happened
That looks more like moisture then dust to me.
Have you ever had the phone opened? (replaced screen or back glass)
I wonder if opening the side ports, putting the phone in a sealed container with some silica gel packs, in a warm place might help?
My camera is so horrible too, only Google Camera make half-decent photos.
Let's hope official Marshmallow will do miracles, likely not.
I have the exact same problem. After some time the photos just look foggy. I hope this isn't a case of continuous dust piling up under the back glass and affecting the lense...
Hi, today I made some pictures under low light conditions with 4 cameras:
Money taken from the top of a glass, light and distance conditions equal, camera fully auto.
Iphone 5, Iphone 6, Z3C locked (lollipop), Z3C unlocked (marshmallow).
My own unlocked Z3C is the loser.
you have to relock the bl and restore your backup TA to get good images again in low light. or if you want to stay with unlocked BL, you have to use the drm fix
Hi @regcoll !!
At the end i was able to found out someone else with my exact same problem... have a Z3 Compact since May last year and it made outstanding pics a the begining... however it got blurrier and blurrier. Now even old Nexus4 is closer to it.
regcoll said:
Anyway, I'll try to get Sony to fix it
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you got some feedback from them? Here in Spain the costs sending, repairing and returning the phone to a Sony dealer might costs as much as new Z3C
result
I've contacted Sony about it and they agreed to repair it under warranty (even that the phone is 15 months old).
They've replaced the camera part.
The new camera feels a bit different so they either changed the camera for Z3 at some point or installed the camera from a newer phone.
It's working well now, the only downside I was left 3 weeks without a phone which was annoying as my spare one is too old.
Hi,
Was looking around for any answers on the same issue. So is mine, very hard to focus now and images are very "HAZY". I checked my back camera lens and noticed odd scratch marks. Apparently, its the lens not being of gorilla glass, or a film that's getting scratched off - I'm not sure. Still in the process of figuring it out.
regcoll said:
I've contacted Sony about it and they agreed to repair it under warranty (even that the phone is 15 months old).
They've replaced the camera part.
The new camera feels a bit different so they either changed the camera for Z3 at some point or installed the camera from a newer phone.
It's working well now, the only downside I was left 3 weeks without a phone which was annoying as my spare one is too old.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hello to all. I have the same problem with z3 compact.Photos are not focused well, foggy when maximize photo is more blurred.If take a pic of a book from 1 meter away, in the zooming can not read small letters. This problem started since Jan 17, as i take backup of all my photos in google. I gave the phone to a Sony certified center for the problem.They replaced everything familiar with the lens, also the display.The problem still occurs!!!!!

FiLMiC Pro

Has anyone tried using FiLMiC Pro with the Huawei P30 Pro to adjust for the oversaturation and lack of color accuracy on the main camera during video? Mine is still on order but I'm hoping the issue of red tint can be resolved with a 3rd party app.
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
Good question, I need to know that. And I want to know did Filmic Pro enable "raw videos" recording? Because in Mate 20 Pro is not possible.
I really need to know this. Thx a lot
Ran the compatibility test on mine:
https://photos.app.goo.gl/k8uss1hBRbJRDy1s7
You can just use the Leica 'smooth' color mode option on P30 Pro to get cinematic effects video & less saturation.
Less hassle & save time to edit later. At least for me, as i dont have the time to edit it lol.
Coincidentally, confirms my thoughts that the sony sensor in the P30 Pro isn't capturing at a full 960FPS for super slow, only at 240 and then interpolated to 960
NJ72 said:
Ran the compatibility test on mine:
https://photos.app.goo.gl/k8uss1hBRbJRDy1s7
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So this means P30 Pro can record in RAW?
---------- Post added at 09:54 AM ---------- Previous post was at 09:53 AM ----------
NJ72 said:
Coincidentally, confirms my thoughts that the sony sensor in the P30 Pro isn't capturing at a full 960FPS for super slow, only at 240 and then interpolated to 960
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im very sad because they can make very good slow motion. Even 1080p with 960fps.
isko01 said:
So this means P30 Pro can record in RAW? .
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have no idea, I've not got the Filmic Pro app, just installed the compatibility checker for people's info if they didn't already have the phone.
I have filmic Pro. Where do I specifically check if it's raw. It allows Hevc and log v2.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my VOG-L09 using Tapatalk
compunerd3 said:
I have filmic Pro. Where do I specifically check if it's raw. It allows Hevc and log v2.
View attachment 4741538
Sent from my VOG-L09 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't know either because I'm new to the app. Still waiting for my P30. How is the issue of oversaturation on your device? Can you try FiLMiC and see how the video looks if you take the saturation down about 25%?
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
compunerd3 said:
I have filmic Pro. Where do I specifically check if it's raw. It allows Hevc and log v2.
View attachment 4741538
Sent from my VOG-L09 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you check if it allows for log v2? Can you select the log curve and the image really changes in its appearance? I cannot do that on my device and I was reading rumors that the Kirin 980 somehow blocks the Log recording. Seems there is a similar problem in the Mate 20 Pro.
Maybe you could attach a screenshot from flat vs log v2 in your app?
Thanks already for the reply!
IliasK88S said:
Did you check if it allows for log v2? Can you select the log curve and the image really changes in its appearance? I cannot do that on my device and I was reading rumors that the Kirin 980 somehow blocks the Log recording. Seems there is a similar problem in the Mate 20 Pro.
Maybe you could attach a screenshot from flat vs log v2 in your app?
Thanks already for the reply!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can choose the Log V2 option but I can't see any difference in any of those curves no matter what I'm aiming at outside or inside. Seems it isn't working
Sent from my VOG-L09 using Tapatalk
EricMartinSoCal said:
I don't know either because I'm new to the app. Still waiting for my P30. How is the issue of oversaturation on your device? Can you try FiLMiC and see how the video looks if you take the saturation down about 25%?
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1: Huawei video with no change to settings (not pro mode)
https://photos.app.goo.gl/V3S8CzXRbgYHuu4k9
2: Filmic pro with 25% less saturation.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/KNN5KJpQhQy8ViDj9
Sent from my VOG-L09 using Tapatalk
compunerd3 said:
1: Huawei video with no change to settings (not pro mode)
https://photos.app.goo.gl/V3S8CzXRbgYHuu4k9
2: Filmic pro with 25% less saturation.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/KNN5KJpQhQy8ViDj9
Sent from my VOG-L09 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay. I think this is going to be the solution! Thank you. The main problem is red so the best way to see is people's skin tones, or something that is red. However it also affects all shades of red, which includes brown, and I can see a significant change in the bush in the video to a more natural shade. I have been dying to find someone using FiLMiC. This looks like an important improvement.
Once I have the phone next Wednesday, I will do some extensive testing and try to post the most color accurate settings. Thanks!
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
EricMartinSoCal said:
Okay. I think this is going to be the solution! Thank you. The main problem is red so the best way to see is people's skin tones, or something that is red. However it also affects all shades of red, which includes brown, and I can see a significant change in the bush in the video to a more natural shade. I have been dying to find someone using FiLMiC. This looks like an important improvement.
Once I have the phone next Wednesday, I will do some extensive testing and try to post the most color accurate settings. Thanks!
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My pleasure, I don't know a lot about filmic so if there's more you want me to take I can.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/nYZTBoGDeDi8Sug26
This is also filmic but not with any saturation reduced
Sent from my VOG-L09 using Tapatalk
compunerd3 said:
My pleasure, I don't know a lot about filmic so if there's more you want me to take I can.
https://photos.app.goo.gl/nYZTBoGDeDi8Sug26
This is also filmic but not with any saturation reduced
Sent from my VOG-L09 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You'll see in the screen shots in my link (taken from a review video) that the stock color palate is completely out of whack. Look at the biker's face for example or the color of the sky or the red on the building in the second pic.
http://imgur.com/a/DJ5YfFD
My information is that the latest updates addressed some of this. I think FiLMiC will actually solve it once I have a test pattern and can dial it all in to a color accurate setting. It's mostly people, brick buildings and anything that has red, like a stop sign, tail lights on a car, stop lights etc. I will get a few test patterns and spend a day getting everything accurate . I'll send you the settings and you can put them in as a pre-set so you'll never need to adjust. While most people don't want to spend the money to have the full featured app, for those of us that do it might completely save an otherwise great device!
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
EricMartinSoCal said:
You'll see in the screen shots in my link (taken from a review video) that the stock color palate is completely out of whack. Look at the biker's face for example or the color of the sky or the red on the building in the second pic.
http://imgur.com/a/DJ5YfFD
My information is that the latest updates addressed some of this. I think FiLMiC will actually solve it once I have a test pattern and can dial it all in to a color accurate setting. It's mostly people, brick buildings and anything that has red, like a stop sign, tail lights on a car, stop lights etc. I will get a few test patterns and spend a day getting everything accurate . I'll send you the settings and you can put them in as a pre-set so you'll never need to adjust. While most people don't want to spend the money to have the full featured app, for those of us that do it might completely save an otherwise great device!
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hellboy spotted in the first picture Anyway, which firmware are you on? Never seen the red tint being this bad on mine though. Lastly, does the video stutter when horizontal panning whilst using Filmic Pro ?
I didn't notice too much red on my stock camera either
Sent from my VOG-L09 using Tapatalk
compunerd3 said:
I didn't notice too much red on my stock camera either
Sent from my VOG-L09 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's possible that the latest updates fixed a lot of the saturation issue. That's great info. I see you have the VOG-L09 which is what I have coming as well. I don't have my phone yet, but the red issue may be a result of early software. It's mostly found in the review videos which were all shot in Paris at the launch. I do however think the FilMiC Pro video you posted seems a more realistic color palate than the stock one you posted so everything points to positive results. I've got a whole thread on the red tint and stutter on video going here in the "guides" section.
To answer the question asked before this, I don't think FiLMiC will help with the horizontal stutter? Unless @compunerd3 sees something improved in this area?
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
EricMartinSoCal said:
It's possible that the latest updates fixed a lot of the saturation issue. That's great info. I see you have the VOG-L09 which is what I have coming as well. I don't have my phone yet, but the red issue may be a result of early software. It's mostly found in the review videos which were all shot in Paris at the launch. I do however think the FilMiC Pro video you posted seems a more realistic color palate than the stock one you posted so everything points to positive results. I've got a whole thread on the red tint and stutter on video going here in the "guides" section.
To answer the question asked before this, I don't think FiLMiC will help with the horizontal stutter? Unless @compunerd3 sees something improved in this area?
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I don't notice a stutter in horizontal panning in either stock camera or Filmic pro. I'll try some proper footage later on or tomorrow to compare and upload but first hand I don't notice it.
Sent from my VOG-L09 using Tapatalk
compunerd3 said:
I don't notice a stutter in horizontal panning in either stock camera or Filmic pro. I'll try some proper footage later on or tomorrow to compare and upload but first hand I don't notice it.
Sent from my VOG-L09 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I can live with it... but here is an example. Again, it's on pre-release software.
https://youtu.be/GjUKdPabp0U
Sent from my SM-G975U1 using Tapatalk

Categories

Resources