Related
Nightlies just started officially dropping the other day, so I'm curious what you guys have thought thus far.
Found here: http://get.cm/?device=quincyatt
I'm on a stock ICS build, so I think I have to flash a GB ROM and then flash CM from there. Which is fine; just curious
starkruzr said:
Nightlies just started officially dropping the other day, so I'm curious what you guys have thought thus far.
Found here: http://get.cm/?device=quincyatt
I'm on a stock ICS build, so I think I have to flash a GB ROM and then flash CM from there. Which is fine; just curious
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Going by cm based roms as of june, it's very stable, definitely stable enough for daily driver. Issues as of june, shorter battery, possible GPS issues, blue tooth a2dp stable connection.
I'd definitely give it a try and thanks for the heads up.
And yes, you need to flash from GB kernel with Root and cwm afaik.
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Its very stable rom I am currently using it
U should give it a try
Sent from my GT-N7000 using xda premium
Using PA based on CM9 from the time it came out. No problems at all. Amazing ROM!
Sent from my Galaxy Note running ParanoidAndroid v0.4 using XDA Premium xD
sujal said:
Using PA based on CM9 from the time it came out. No problems at all. Amazing ROM!
Sent from my Galaxy Note running ParanoidAndroid v0.4 using XDA Premium xD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1+ I concur, even though I didn't get on-board with paranoid android rom until version 04 was released but it is an EXCELLENT rom! Maybe the PA team should get together with Samsung on making this rom preinstalled software for the next generation of galaxy note.
Never gonna happen
Are the battery issues mitigated from what they were?
starkruzr said:
Are the battery issues mitigated from what they were?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
on my device (ymmv!), after the basic tweaks (disabling unnecessary apps, syncs etc.), the standby battery life was not worse than on stock GB or ICS. During normal usage, esp. while browsing on wifi it was much better - the estimated current consumption on CM9 was at ca. 500mA on new ICS 4.0.4 its closer to 750mA in the same conditions.
Hey guys, just out of curiosity, will we ever get Jellybean ported to the Captivate? If so how long does this process normally take?
Sorry I have no idea how these things work, not being impatient, just wondering.
Thanks
If you want it that bad, the TAJB port for I9000 works fine on our phone with the latest Devil Kernel
It's a slightly long process to get everything(SMS+phone) to work
1: clear dalvik, normal cache, and wipe data
2: flash TAJB .45
3: flash devil Kernel
4: search through thread and flash test modem for phone calls and SMS
5: place the audio_policy.conf from the nexus s port into the system/etc/ folder
Sent from my GT-I9000 using xda premium
There's another thread discussing Jelly Bean for Captivate. You might want to check that one. It doesn't have any firm timeframes for any of the ROMs to release a 4.1 version, but it does confirm that they're working on it.
Try this: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1775373, it works fine for me. Only things that do not work - Camera and Sound notifications. Otherwise, it is pretty awesome. :laugh:
Yeah ,JB on Cap but camera and youtube not work
fancy90 said:
Yeah ,JB on Cap but camera and youtube not work
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
umm.. there is a fix for the youtube in unofficial cm10 android 4.1 thread in the captivate android development thread...
irfarf said:
umm.. there is a fix for the youtube in unofficial cm10 android 4.1 thread in the captivate android development thread...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
oh , I install cm10 v2 is working good
Just flashed it using the directions posted.
Can't seem to get my Data to connect. Won't save any apn's I add to it to connect. The phone can locate the appropriate Network Operator (CAN Rogers Wireless Inc.), but data will not connect.Also, when I go to the Data Usage tab, it doesn't show a tab that lets you see Data na dWireless usage like it did in ICS.
Any ideas on how to fix?? JellyBean is wicked smooth for such an ealy release and I'd hate to revert back to CM9 (it was not cooperating with my cappy!)
I'm on jb, and everything seems to be working extremely well for such am early alpha release! Running the unofficial Cm10v2 with devil kernel
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda app-developers app
It's awesome!
TheSchatz said:
I'm on jb, and everything seems to be working extremely well for such am early alpha release! Running the unofficial Cm10v2 with devil kernel
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Same here, just installed it last night and it's smoother than any rom I've EVER used! That project butter google built for jb is crazy smooth
Funny thing guys, Project butter hasn't been incorporated into the kernels yet. The v-sync and timings have to be messed with. So if you think it's smooth now, wait until project butter is actually running
b-eock said:
Funny thing guys, Project butter hasn't been incorporated into the kernels yet. The v-sync and timings have to be messed with. So if you think it's smooth now, wait until project butter is actually running
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's ridiculous. I noticed an amazing jump in smoothness from the latest CM9 nightly to the V2 of the Jelly Bean ROM and if it's only gonna get better, I can't wait to see how fast it gets. Still very, very minor bugs that barely affect functionality at all, but man is it fast!
ya i noticed it was crazy smooth as well. but couldn't live w/o camera. so i went back to remics-ux. which is almost identically smooth imo. cant wait util we actually get project butter and a fully functional jb rom
Phlashaholic said:
ya i noticed it was crazy smooth as well. but couldn't live w/o camera. so i went back to remics-ux. which is almost identically smooth imo. cant wait util we actually get project butter and a fully functional jb rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Remics ICS is what I'm still running, this rom with Sephamore kernel is just incredibly responsive and smooth.
shariqm said:
Remics ICS is what I'm still running, this rom with Sephamore kernel is just incredibly responsive and smooth.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You ought to relook the JB ROMs. I'm using DerTeufel's, and haven't had any problems with any component in the last three releases.
cbalt and dave have stripped down versions of DerTeufel's port, and by all reports, they're worth of being your daily driver, too.
peteypoo said:
You ought to relook the JB ROMs. I'm using DerTeufel's, and haven't had any problems with any component in the last three releases.
cbalt and dave have stripped down versions of DerTeufel's port, and by all reports, they're worth of being your daily driver, too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I've been on cbalt's version like 4 I think since 28 July as daily with no problem camera working and even TV out
Sent from my SGH-I897 using xda premium
Hi,
I´am using PAC-man ROM, but there are few problems. Bluetooth and brightness.
But is is good ROM and I have a question.
It´s better Lacoste or PAC-man? Both using android 4.2.2 so I can´t decided.
Thx for your advice
lubabe said:
Hi,
I´am using PAC-man ROM, but there are few problems. Bluetooth and brightness.
But is is good ROM and I have a question.
It´s better Lacoste or PAC-man? Both using android 4.2.2 so I can´t decided.
Thx for your advice
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Lacoste does not have the bluetooth issue and is a quite stable ROM.. but with Lacoste you won't get the various UI modes which PACman offers; neither the AOKP customization options.. Further if you install v21 - it does not have bluetooth issue;
So you need to decide whether you want eye candies or fully functional ROM.. I am myself on PACman and since I do not use bluetooth much: I am fine the way it is.. have been using it since it was released..
srv.abhishek said:
Lacoste does not have the bluetooth issue and is a quite stable ROM.. but with Lacoste you won't get the various UI modes which PACman offers; neither the AOKP customization options.. Further if you install v21 - it does not have bluetooth issue;
So you need to decide whether you want eye candies or fully functional ROM.. I am myself on PACman and since I do not use bluetooth much: I am fine the way it is.. have been using it since it was released..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So you say PACman hmm... but this trouble... it´s annoying
lubabe said:
So you say PACman hmm... but this trouble... it´s annoying
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am saying that if you move to v21, then bluetooth issue is not there so far as I remember; if you encounter that, check the jellytime ROM page; there is a bluetooth fix.. it works on all the 4.1.2 and 4.2.2 ROMs except the latest version,22, of PACman
srv.abhishek said:
I am saying that if you move to v21, then bluetooth issue is not there so far as I remember; if you encounter that, check the jellytime ROM page; there is a bluetooth fix.. it works on all the 4.1.2 and 4.2.2 ROMs except the latest version,22, of PACman
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So I download Lacoste but it´s big difference between Lacoste and PACman. PAC is better but the bluetooth.. I need it. On the other side I want newest version
lubabe said:
So I download Lacoste but it´s big difference between Lacoste and PACman. PAC is better but the bluetooth.. I need it. On the other side I want newest version
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
now you are being greedy
so far as i understand, there is no major difference between v21 and v22.. in v22, latest PAC code has been synced.. users say battery life is better (i haven't observed much change though)..
other option is that you wait for blindndumb to release a new version with the fix
srv.abhishek said:
Lacoste does not have the bluetooth issue and is a quite stable ROM.. but with Lacoste you won't get the various UI modes which PACman offers; neither the AOKP customization options.. Further if you install v21 - it does not have bluetooth issue;
So you need to decide whether you want eye candies or fully functional ROM.. I am myself on PACman and since I do not use bluetooth much: I am fine the way it is.. have been using it since it was released..
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Switched to lacoste after using PacMan for a while and will stick to lacoste...prefer having a nice stable working ROM than a few tweaks that ill eventually get bored of.
And pretty happy with the lacoste experience.
Hm.. Lacoste is slower.. but really, really slower. PACman is nr. 1
Please stop making these "Which ROM is better thread?" This is all opinion based. On top of that its very offensive to developers who put a lot of their time away to create ROMs. Please try out the ROMs yourself and look at what other people have to say about the ROM in the respective ROM threads.
First of all, a million thanks for developers who are still working on this great device!
I have been using unofficial CyanogenMod 10.1 for vivo by dla5244. Haven't looked for anything else for quite some time, but now I am thinking of changing it. Could someone suggest any other no-Sense ROM? I need -
- Better or similar battery life
- Faster application launch
- More stability (less bug)
- and JellyBean at least
Thanks in advance...
Try CM 10.2 by szezso recently updated check the last page.
Or try CM 10.1 again by szezso with latest kernel on last page.
And the best ROM is again by szezso which CM10.
I would say try all of these and choose according to your use. But my vote goes to CM10 by szezso.
And I have tried all the ROMS available for this device
Iqbal Ansari said:
Try CM 10.2 by szezso recently updated check the last page.
Or try CM 10.1 again by szezso with latest kernel on last page.
And the best ROM is again by szezso which CM10.
I would say try all of these and choose according to your use. But my vote goes to CM10 by szezso.
And I have tried all the ROMS available for this device
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks a lot, Iqbal. Unfortunately, the problem is I don't have enough time and patience to try out all ROMs along with apps I use.
Could you tell me which of them gave you the best battery life, and also with which kernel?
What improvement I can expect with me coming from unofficial CM10.1 by dla5244?
Also, which kernel do you recommend with CM10 szezso especially?
Thank you once again!
ddsam said:
Thanks a lot, Iqbal. Unfortunately, the problem is I don't have enough time and patience to try out all ROMs along with apps I use.
Could you tell me which of them gave you the best battery life, and also with which kernel?
What improvement I can expect with me coming from unofficial CM10.1 by dla5244?
Also, which kernel do you recommend with CM10 szezso especially?
Thank you once again!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I already said CM10 is best.
CM10 by szezso with his latest kernel link: http://d-h.st/n9T
It has best battery life among all the kernels. The kernel is for CM10.1 but will work with all CM versions.
I use [ROM][CM11][4.4.1][KOT49E]VivoKat[Source-built][PMEM][BETA #5][12/12/2013]
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2519414
egorlins said:
I use [ROM][CM11][4.4.1][KOT49E]VivoKat[Source-built][PMEM][BETA #5][12/12/2013]
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2519414
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Just a heads up, I would NOT recommend this if you need a lot of battery. the KitKat build by Szeszo is still in development and still a number of bugs to fix. Along with that, the battery isn't very good. If you want good battery, I would highly recommend CyanVivo10.1 by Szeszo. Its 4.2.2 (although I think you know this ) and its pretty much fixed. DO NOT flash the latest kernel. The latest kernel seems to have a slight issue with CPU wakelocks and, as a result, has a lot of battery drain. Perhaps Szeszo will fix it and release another version later.
072665995 said:
Just a heads up, I would NOT recommend this if you need a lot of battery. the KitKat build by Szeszo is still in development and still a number of bugs to fix. Along with that, the battery isn't very good. If you want good battery, I would highly recommend CyanVivo10.1 by Szeszo. Its 4.2.2 (although I think you know this ) and its pretty much fixed. DO NOT flash the latest kernel. The latest kernel seems to have a slight issue with CPU wakelocks and, as a result, has a lot of battery drain. Perhaps Szeszo will fix it and release another version later.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But the latest kernel is much better in terms of smoothness and performance
Sent from my Incredible S S710e using xda app-developers app
anonymousss said:
But the latest kernel is much better in terms of smoothness and performance
Sent from my Incredible S S710e using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
But no deepsleep ---> lots of battery drain
Also beta#6 for Vivokat, SMS is broken but Szeszo says he will fix it for Beta #7
072665995 said:
Just a heads up, I would NOT recommend this if you need a lot of battery. the KitKat build by Szeszo is still in development and still a number of bugs to fix. Along with that, the battery isn't very good. If you want good battery, I would highly recommend CyanVivo10.1 by Szeszo. Its 4.2.2 (although I think you know this ) and its pretty much fixed. DO NOT flash the latest kernel. The latest kernel seems to have a slight issue with CPU wakelocks and, as a result, has a lot of battery drain. Perhaps Szeszo will fix it and release another version later.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
couldn't agree more with this..
guys, suggest a stable build instead. Others might not be as adventurous as us who always eagerly to try out the latest release.
anonymousss said:
But the latest kernel is much better in terms of smoothness and performance
Sent from my Incredible S S710e using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Latest kernel can be used in any of those cm Roms. Same source is used for all kernels
Sent from my HTC One using XDA Premium 4 mobile app
anonymousss said:
But the latest kernel is much better in terms of smoothness and performance
Sent from my Incredible S S710e using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
In engineering it's called a trade-off, in this case performance for battery life. Granted that there are a few bugs which, once fixed, will improve the situation but for know I guess that's the compromise you have to make (and hope that the developer can fix the bugs soon )
072665995 said:
But no deepsleep ---> lots of battery drain
Also beta#6 for Vivokat, SMS is broken but Szeszo says he will fix it for Beta #7
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
in beta6 sms is broken, but after intalled update sms still work fine, but update is with some bugs, maybe only my ics have that problems, but when i dongradet from beta7 to beta6 and sms still works
Szezso's Vivokat 4.3.1
Sent from my Incredible S S710e using xda app-developers app
sujeetpatwa said:
Szezso's Vivokat 4.3.1
Sent from my Incredible S S710e using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're not making sense.
Vivokat is 4.4.2
and CyanVivo10.2 is running 10.3
Thanks for this thread, in terms of sense Roms what do you recommend?
I remember when I had this phone with sense3.5, nik 's Roms where the best. Then Android 4 came and after a while I gave the phone to my father. It is running arhd 6.0 but I find it a little sluggish. Any faster ROM that won't have bugs (since the phone is not mine I can't test them all) .
Just out of curiosity what version of Cm by Szezso Roms do you think it's the best,the one with 4.1.2, 4.2.2 or 4.3.1?I think 4.4.2 maybe with some problems right?
Sent from my HTC One using Tapatalk
Sense ROM's. ~ Try SVHD,
Szezso ROM ~ try CM10 (4.1)
Sent from my HTC Incredible S
I use Viper Vivo 2.5.3 Sense Rom and no sense Lacoste mod 4.2.2, it's clean, fast and stable.
Wysłane z mojego HTC Incredible S przy użyciu Tapatalka
Suggest a rom with best battery performance. I m currently using sense rom svhd n new battery (just two days old). N my battery backup is not that good as u can see it below
Sent from my HTC Incredible S using xda app-developers app
Hey guys
I am on xxugna8 and I am not sure if my phone can get any better. I came from i9000 on cm10.2 and now I am super happy with my new stock s3. How is your experience with the latest cm11 or cm10.2? Is it worth to flash? What would you recommend?
Thanks very much for your opinions.
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk
I'm also happy with my stock Rom but my phone is rooted I waiting for 4.4 stock Rom. In my opinion samsung Rom is quite good. Only 4.4 I will load in my phone
Wysłane z mojego GT-I9305 przy użyciu Tapatalka
stay on stock...on CM they fix one thing today buy break another....so until a fully working stable version is up - stock.
spiderman07 said:
stay on stock...on CM they fix one thing today buy break another....so until a fully working stable version is up - stock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, cm 10 has a stable on the s3. But you are probably right. Don't change a winning team, I guess…
Sent from my GT-I9300 using Tapatalk
i don't have an s3...i have an s3 4g....
Well it sounds like you're curious about cm. Why not give it a go?
I was the same, happy with my stock until I was slightly unhappy with it (about 6 months on....) then I started tweaking and now I'm on CM.
In my experience with my s3 which i've had just over a year and half, playing around with different roms . I prefer stock rom for its stability. CM or other modded custom roms may be faster, provide few extra features here and there, but there always seems to be tiny bugs here and there. Mostly problems with the camera. And for my own usage i think Stock Sammy rom is more than enough, and if you need extra features use xposed modules and most of the things you need will be there
Jerryxmas said:
In my experience with my s3 which i've had just over a year and half, playing around with different roms . I prefer stock rom for its stability. CM or other modded custom roms may be faster, provide few extra features here and there, but there always seems to be tiny bugs here and there. Mostly problems with the camera. And for my own usage i think Stock Sammy rom is more than enough, and if you need extra features use xposed modules and most of the things you need will be there
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Jerry, if that's the case, maybe look at stable or official releases...
They get updated possibly the same amount as stock roms if not more, and are stable.
That being said though, most people who don't stock want the latest version even if it's beta at times, which why some ROMs like CM have nightly, weekly, stable and official releases.
Hope that helps.
spiderman07 said:
stay on stock...on CM they fix one thing today buy break another....so until a fully working stable version is up - stock.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I disagree whit you. I'm updating almost every day and cm works very well.
Sent from my GT-I9305 using Tapatalk