I was playing Raging Thunder 2 last night and it made me want to ask this question or raise this issue to anyone that could have an effect on or shed light on. The graphics on raging thunder 2 as well as a few other games on the nexus are as good if not better than that on the psp. So why then are there only a few decent games with good graphics, and also why not a full psp well working emulator. It seems like the gaming community is growing yet nothing all that great is being produced(no offense, just a statement based on visual display opinion). Just want to get some feedback from people that can give it to me. Thanks.
First of all, let me kill your hopes of the psp emulator (sorry!). Emulators require in excess of 10x the processing power, which is a long ways off. Android is still working on getting all gameboy games to run without skipping frames (last I saw).
As far as the well-developed games go...you have to put a lot of effort into making a game with good graphics. You also need a market for the game to sell. There are a lot of psp games because you can sell them for $40 and get a large amount of people to buy them. Good luck selling pretty much anything for $40 on android. For most people, their phone is not a gaming platform.
That said, I must agree with you on the disappointment on available games. I can understand having poor graphics, but I feel that there should be more games with greater depth and gameplay available.
This is all of course just my opinion. I am sure there is more going on than I said.
Stone Builder 1.1 has been published on the Windows Phone 7 Marketplace. If you like puzzle games and fun, do check this one out. It is free and has 30 levels of fun and mind bending puzzle solving with heavy stone tumbling and pushing action. Feel like an ancient architect in Mayan or Egyptian times.
Become an ancient stone builder and construct transcendental structures that riddles modern archeologists. Think like an architect and act like an engineer to solve mind bending puzzles that challenged ancient stone builders.
Updates for v 1.4
- 5 more new bonus levels (36-40)
- Bug fixes
Updates for v 1.2
- 5 new bonus levels (31-35)
- Smoother gameplay in larger games (Undo buffer was slowing down movements)
- Blog & Solution videos made accessible within the game
Updates for v 1.1
- New and easier tap controls
- 3 difficulty levels
- New sound fx that make gameplay incredibly fun!
Game is updated every 2-3 weeks with new features and levels.
very good game, thanks
Great Game
This is a very well thought game that actually pushes people to think hard and fast while playing the game. Once you are engaged, you have no idea how time passes by
Thank you, nice game
Any difference between the 2 games on Marketplace: Stone Age & Stone Builder?
Finaly I managed to complete my first game for WP7
- Programming and Graphics done by me
- Music - Kevin MacLeod
GARGS:
Gargs – Challenging Tower defence !!!!
Play as Chixa's last hope and defend it from evil Gargs.
Test your defending skills featuring:
- 10 different Maps
- 9 different weapons
- upgradable weapons
- unique bosses
- unlockable weapons and awards
- mechanic, organic, air and shield units
- epic music by Kevin MacLeod
- free gameplay
Mighty defender, prepare yourself, Gargs are coming!!!
Marketplace:
FREE: http://www.windowsphone.com/en-us/apps/012d2409-55e0-4bd8-a770-da1dd2102f23
NO-ADS: http://www.windowsphone.com/en-us/apps/b7279f0b-1277-4315-8a91-6b4e6180ae72
Both version have same content.
Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/DigitalSwell
Video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vqLlagl8VUQ
PS. Enjoy the game
If you like this game - please leave a review.
I'm enjoying the game. Thanks for making it.
I have a thought though. I always love in these games that you can power up the weapons. i find it frustrating in yours that I don't seem to be able to max any of them out. The attacks are such that I need so many weapons to keep up. Or... if I build up something good (lv 4: 2 lazers, 10 guns, 1 turret) and get them to some good levels and am getting somewhere... then there's a flurry of planes that need some other weapon. Ugh!
Hi,
First of all thank you for your positive feedback. This is my first game ever and I am still learning.
It took me quite a while to create the game… especially graphics, since I am not a professional graphics artist and really can´t draw , so I created 3d models for everything you see in the game and then created spritemaps.
Sure they can be maxed, but you need better strategy
Some game tips:
1.) You need to check which weapon makes most damage to which type of units.
- machine/gatling tower does most damage to infantry.
- missile/rocket tower to vehicles,
- laser tower to shields
etc.. (just press the tower icon for more info)
2.) Also check how to place towers. Make sure to destroy shields with laser, put them before Gatling towers. Best strategy is to have laser tower first, then missile towers and at the end Gatling. After you unlock plasma or nuke tower, strategy may change
3.) Unlocok tower price drop... and other upgrades.
This way you do not really need to build a lots of towers
Thanks for playing
What do you get for a Gargs tower upgrade?
I'd like to know what kind of increases you get for upgrades to the different towers. For example, if I upgrade the fire tower, I can see how much the range increases, but what about the damage it can inflict? A laser is an expensive upgrade, for example, so should I work on that or go with upgrading a different tower? Most TD games seem to show you what you get for your upgrade cost. Thanks.
good game, still playing now
Oh Hai,
I've got a new game out there, Cyber Attack. It is a nice little variation on the old Missile Command type of games from back in the day.
Features:
-Upgradable guns
--Each with their own unique abilities
-Two game modes
-Online leaderboards
-Various enemies for you to kill
There is also already a patch in the pipes that improves the loading time and makes it more consistent visually. I hope you all enjoy this.
Logan Nowak
http://windowsphone.com/s?appid=701ca6c3-6dbd-4090-ad48-8ac74e0aca78
PS - Releasing this around the same time as Bullet Asylum is going to hurt
This is actually pretty fun. I still feels like it is missing something, though.
Hear me out for a few minutes guys.
Programmers now days are great...right? No... they really are not. Because programmers are making programs/games on extremely powerful machines (if you think about it) and have zero concept of "limits". A game for example, Titan Fall on PC is 50GB's. Why... for the love of all that is good, is this game 50GB's? Why? Because the programmers that made it suck. There are so many games that take up WAY too much space and take WAY too much power to run...
BUT
But this is NOT the programmers fault... They were not trained correctly. Hence my topic point.
Limitations Make you a Better Dev.
What is a limitation? It's something that limits you, like a gallon container can... only hold a gallon. Makes sense right? Well, let's move on the programming. Most programmers now days are making games/programs in what I like to refer to as "Creative Sandbox Mode". They don't really have limitations. They can almost do anything! But this is a problem... let's see an example to illustrate the reason why.
We will use the game "Kerbal Space Program" as our example for this topic. (Fantastic Game BTW) For those who have not seen/heard about it. It is a game where you build space rockets in, for the most part, a very well simulated Solar System. You start from a planet similar to earth. The only difference is the size of everything is scaled down. But just keep in your mind, "You build rockets to go to space".
Now, moving on...
When this game came out at first as early access. It was basically a sandbox, while you had no "God mode", you had access to all the rocket ship parts and they had zero costs. You could build anything, and people made all kinds of nonsense, went to the Mun (Game's name for the planet's moon) and beyond to other planets.
Sounds great right? It was... but then something changed a few years later.
Career and Science Sandbox were added. What is this? Well it's a mode with progression in mind, Career has you earning money through space missions and contracts, and Science Sandbox requires no money... but requires "science" points to acquire new parts.
You start out now...with very limited parts, and the things you are asked to do in the missions seem "impossible" at first.
"You mean I have to get to orbit with ONLY these parts? WHAT? THERE IS NO WAY!..."
Except...it was possible. Suddenly people, while under a great limitation, began to progress. They learned new and better ways and deigns to make more efficient rockets. You advance, and learn and become better. You progress, slowly unlocking more parts...but always being under this limitation wall, it forces you to grow and learn even more.
Now...end game. You've unlocked all the parts. You build the "best rocket" you can muster. Compare it to your "best rocket" while you played in Free Sandbox mode... It's a 1000x better. It can go much further on less fuel, it's less heavy, and it has far more research and science ability that ever before. Smaller rockets can now go beyond the moon and back, where as before, huge ones barely made it into orbit...
What does this mean? Now...with your super efficient skills, you can go EVEN further than ever before, you're able to truly maximize the potential of the parts given to you.
You've become efficient . You've become a better player.
But the KEY here for relation to my topic is... "truly maximized potential"
Now, let's get back to programming. Now that we have an understanding of what my point is. Back in the day, game developers had extreme limits. Hyper tiny storage sizes, extremely low amounts of ram and processing power. You couldn't just do whatever you wanted. The PC wouldn't even run.
Look at games like Super Mario Bros, a classic simple game... But, fast forward to later in the NES's lifespan, look at Megaman. The difference in total quality, and game play, it's a night and day difference. You go from a super basic, jump on enemies, beat the same boss over and over, running through basic one color levels... to a game that has a "level select" and unique and difference bosses, and... TONS of different enemies. You see levels with lots of animations and color! Holy crap! This is amazing! AND WHAT!? YOU GET WEAPONS THAT DO DIFFERENT THINGS!? *mind explodes*
See what happen? NES programmers got better over time, they learned to maximize what the NES could do despite its limits. Games that at the start of its' life that would have been thought impossible... were suddenly happening.
So let's fast forward to today... what do we have? For the most part... our computers today have near limitless abilities. Most computers have over a 1000GB's of storage, over 4GB's of ram (if not over 8GB), and processors that can do millions, if not nearly billions of calculations per second... Vs computers with 32KB's of Ram, 1 MB of storage, and a 10 mhz processor.
So we should be seeing games with extremely outrageous levels of ability and graphics right...? No... we don't. Well, we have a few. And I think the reason is older devs who were used to coding efficiently. They suddenly become god like. But new programmers? They don't understand limitations like older ones do... so they code poorly without knowing it. This is why you have games like Dark Souls 2, which on PC runs at 60fps at 1440p without the SLIGHTEST hint of issues. (Seriously, it's the smoothest PC game I've ever seen). But then games like Arkham Knight, just barely run at all. (if it even starts...) Also... the version of the Dark Souls 2 that contains all the DLC and improvements to the game (SotFs), weighs in at 23 GB's. Whoa... that's so much! ... Well, it's an extremely huge game, most playthroughs will last you at least 50 to 70 hours. There is so much to see in the game, and it's intense. And...then you have Titan Fall. A multiplayer game with a few maps, no singleplayer (at least when I played it), and it's 50GB's? What? Why? Even GTA 5 is 55GB's (ish) and it's an absolutely MASSIVE map, with detail unlike any seen before. And they crammed it into 50GB's? Wow. While Rockstar and From Software have had a few bad ones *cough* GTA IV and Dark Souls 1 on PC *cough*. They still proved in the end, they knew how to properly make a PC game.
Also, for an example of "getting a ton" from very little processing power. Look at the gameboy advance. It had a 16.78 MHz processor... yet look at the outrageous abilities it had. Look at the games, compare them to mobile "games" (Mobile games are trash). Could you honestly recreate The Legend of Zelda: A link to the past run with just 16mhz of power? If someone didn't tell you it was possible, you'd most likely say, "You cannot do that...". But you can, they did. This is highly efficient coding.
Another example is Roller Coaster Tycoon 1 and 2. If you've not played this game series, I advise you ALL to look it up. This game, released in 1999, was coded by one man. And in 1999 (where the average CPU was Pentium 3) this game let's you build Parks, like with roller coasters and rides. This game could have THOUSANDS of guests (People in your park, 1000 to 4000+) , all with different likes and needs (ride types, needs like food or the restroom), with dozens, if not 50 to 100+ rides going on at the same time... and it ran perfectly fine. In fact, when I played it, I never remember it ever slowing down or crashing, not once. Could you build an entire game with 100s of rides and 1000s+ of guests each with their own unique needs, and plus all the other things going on, on a Pentium 3? With ZERO lag and near instant startup?
This is just one of my issues with devs/programmers today. It's not just about games, or graphics in games mind you. It's about programs, applications, media, just everything. Devs today, learn in a near unlimited environment. They don't learn tricks, they don't learn workarounds, they don't learn how to truly maximize what they have because nothing forces them too.
Now, as a big note... I don't want to sit here and sound like I'm saying any devs are dumb, or don't work hard. I don't mean that at all, because it truly isn't their fault. Schools and such today don't teach with limitations, in computer science and in everything else (that's another topic).
They don't force you to make a massive game that fits in a CD (700MB) that runs well, they don't teach you how to truly optimize, they don't teach you how to overcome limitations because they don't challenge you with limitations.
Limitations, force you to get better. I ask that all new and aspiring devs now days, to try to limit yourself... because in the end... you'll become a far better programmer than you thought possible! You created an android app that runs fine on a snapdragon 810? Alright, how about you make that same app run just as well on a phone with a dual core processor and half a GB of ram from 2010. Start with limitations, you'll think... "This is not possible" , but image to yourself that it is the only way... you soon start finding tricks and learn how to overcome the limitations and create an app that works fantastically with very minimal power and resources. Then, with your new found efficiency skills, you'll see a whole new world of possibilities on more powerful chipsets. Just like in the space game, when you are forced to do more with less, you soon found yourself able to go much further than before when you did have more.
Limitation Forced Growth increases your efficiency. This can allow you to make night and day more powerful applications that run with far less power.
Discuss.