as specified it should be 1280 x 720 pixels. screen shot taken by the phone is 838 x 471 pixels. chrome works at half of what specified 640 x 360 pixels. can someone explain what is going on? is there some kind of a setting at what resolution app / rom should work? is there a way to change it?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Real resolution is 1280x720
Depends on the application I think but how did you figure out that Chrome works on diffrent resolution?
mrjraider said:
Real resolution is 1280x720
Depends on the application I think but how did you figure out that Chrome works on diffrent resolution?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i'm developing web page with media queries, that's how. and its pretty obvious that its not 1280x720...
is there a way to change it? I've just installed firefox and its the same 640x360.
Seems weird.. But I think that the webpage/application is doing this?
mrjraider said:
Seems weird.. But I think that the webpage/application is doing this?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
now way it could be possible. to make web page with plane html / css change resolution of the screen...
Well (this may sound stupid!)
A decent small monitor has a resolution of 1280x720.. So when your device sent out the kind of webpage is wants it should not be the 1280x720 one since that one is for computers..
I believe our device requests a diffrent/other/smaller resolution?
@sunnydyz
only use
@media only screen and (max-width: 767px) {
and this @media only screen and (min-width: 480px) and (max-width: 767px) {
Dont use pixels sizes, use Percentage(%) for widths.
Because all phones are based in the same layout, if are MDPI HDPI XHPI.
U can test on firefox using ctrl+shif+m, and use 320x480
Sorry for my english
Rempty said:
Dont use pixels sizes, use Percentage(%) for widths.
Because all phones are based in the same layout, if are MDPI HDPI XHPI.
U can test on firefox using ctrl+shif+m, and use 320x480
Sorry for my english
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think you didn't understood what I was asking. I have a screen witch is capable of showing 720 x 1280 pixels. but the browser (chrome / firefox (from app store)) is operating/working with screen resolution of 360 x 640. I want that the browser take full advantages of what my phone is capable of! but thanks for that ctrl+shif+m in firefox, I didn't know it.
mrjraider said:
I believe our device requests a diffrent/other/smaller resolution?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I wish it wouldn't do that...
Like I said it may sound stupid, I have 0 knowledge about development etc.... :silly:
sunnydyz said:
I think you didn't understood what I was asking. I have a screen witch is capable of showing 720 x 1280 pixels. but the browser (chrome / firefox (from app store)) is operating/working with screen resolution of 360 x 640. I want that the browser take full advantages of what my phone is capable of! but thanks for that ctrl+shif+m in firefox, I didn't know it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
dont forget navigation bar size...48dpi
Related
Hello guys,
Youtube now has real Super HD Videos (4096p) !! Yes its true and if you are on a slow connection it will take hours to buffer even a single minute.
But you don't need to buffer as some screenshots have already been posted here - Check out Super HD video screenshots!
Here is a pic iam posting here from here.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Catch the full story here.
Update: Its 4096p videos not 4000p.
they still look horrible compared to a normal hd movie; they really should have increased the bitrate instead of resolution
They are improving as of late though. I like their leanback feature too. http://www.youtube.com/leanback
GbrilliantQ said:
They are improving as of late though. I like their leanback feature too. http://www.youtube.com/leanback
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah have youtube leanback feature is also awesome : http://www.techit.in/youtube-launched-leanback/
Not sure about having a 25' screen for the 4000p But, googles leanback feature is very cool
Nice ladies galaxys!!
next time you better invite me
It isn't 4000p. The resolution is 4096*2304 at 24fps. Therefore, it is 2304p.
Its like calling 1080p video 1920p.
black_math said:
It isn't 4000p. The resolution is 4096*2304 at 24fps. Therefore, it is 2304p.
Its like calling 1080p video 1920p.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
the logic doesn't apply to this resolution. youtube have come out with the resolution that is not yet properly defined. but it is progressive. if u make a good search, u'll find it's defined in 4096p and not taken the logic of height..
in fact, this resolution is completely different, its not wqhd, wfhd... no it's completely something else..
This resolution is called 4K (meaning you need 4 HDTV, each 1080p to watch this ). The area is 4 times larger as the sides are 2 times larger than full HD.
Personally I think it is BS. First of all you need expensive cameras like RED ONE to record videos. Second you need 4K display which are rare and also expensive. And most importantly the quality because of compression is not great.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Hi everyone,
Today I saw the preview video of Honeycomb, Android 3.0. I decided it would be a nice waste of time to re-create the wallpaper shown in the video. Check out the zip file for the result.
The .zip contains the following files:
wallpaper1920x1080.jpg
wallpaper1920x1080_text.jpg
wallpaper480x800.jpg
wallpaper800x480.jpg
wallpaper960x800.jpg
Thanks man the version without text looks great. Just what I was looking for.
I think the blue is actually better than the real one. Reminds me of G-Police
Nice! Thanks
Wow, I can't believe I actually found this through Google hahaha. Many many thanks!
Thanks muchly for this!
Awesome!
First off...thank you very much!!! Ive been searching everywhere to find this. Second, if i may, request on of these be made for a 1240 x 1240 resolution. That seems to be the best fit for my G Tablet which is what i am dying to put this on! Thank you again very much for your work!!
CivilDroid said:
First off...thank you very much!!! Ive been searching everywhere to find this. Second, if i may, request on of these be made for a 1240 x 1240 resolution. That seems to be the best fit for my G Tablet which is what i am dying to put this on! Thank you again very much for your work!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi there,
Thanks for the enthusiasm, the making of the wallpaper did take a lot of time
Because 1240 x 1240 sounds like a weird resolution to me, I did a little search on the G Tablet you're using. Do you perhaps mean 1024 x 1024?
Second: however the wallpaper started as a vector drawing, it isn't anymore. So upscaling wouldn't be very different than when you upscale it in your own picture-editing software (e.g. Photoshop).
Enjoy the wallpaper!
Ah, yes you are correct on the resolution. And thanks again for the info!
Colud you do Bee wallpaper in 1080p ?
MrNameless said:
Colud you do Bee wallpaper in 1080p ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm not familiar with Bee wallpaper. Do you have a sample?
HJ200 said:
I'm not familiar with Bee wallpaper. Do you have a sample?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You found it here http://www.megaupload.com/?d=QTKEGF6G
Or here:
-----
Sent from my CDMA Hero. I got some hot Froyo-on-Hero action here!
Thank you for your share.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=931101
HoneyComb Android 2.4 WP Pack v1.0
abumhmmd1 said:
HoneyComb Android 2.4 WP Pack v1.0
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
1080p full HD ?
MrNameless said:
Colud you do Bee wallpaper in 1080p ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=931101 ?
Thanks alot for these
Looks Good！thanks！
What is the screen resolution of the HD+ ? I've read in reviews that it's 1920x1280, but I see in our hardware spec on the root level that it's 1920x1200
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
curiousmike said:
What is the screen resolution of the HD+ ? I've read in reviews that it's 1920x1280, but I see in our hardware spec on the root level that it's 1920x1200
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It is native 1280. But since the navigation bar is usually always there, I think they advertise it has 1200 available. And I don't know what hardware spec on the root level means.
Sent from my Nook HD+ Running CM10 on SD
leapinlar said:
It is native 1280. But since the navigation bar is usually always there, I think they advertise it has 1200 available. And I don't know what hardware spec on the root level means.
Sent from my Nook HD+ Running CM10 on SD
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As for the navigation bar always being there, that could be considered an issue on landscape mode.
In portrait mode, those extra 80 pixels can be really handy for reading.
"root level" - The root forum for Nook HD+; essentially, what I'm showing in the screen capture.
curiousmike said:
As for the navigation bar always being there, that could be considered an issue on landscape mode.
In portrait mode, those extra 80 pixels can be really handy for reading.
"root level" - The root forum for Nook HD+; essentially, what I'm showing in the screen capture.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I still don't know what you mean. What root forum for the HD+?
And as far as hiding the nav bar, it can be done. See my linked post here.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=36143250
Sent from my BNTV400 using Tapatalk
leapinlar said:
I still don't know what you mean. What root forum for the HD+?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He means this page:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2034
At the top of the page it shows stats for the HD+.
lkmiller said:
He means this page:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/forumdisplay.php?f=2034
At the top of the page it shows stats for the HD+.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. That page only shows if you are using the XDA 2013 beta format in your browser, which I hate. I use XDA 2010 for it's simpler format.
And the authors of that page are just wrong. It is 1280.
Sent from my Nook HD+ Running CM10 on SD
leapinlar said:
And the authors of that page are just wrong. It is 1280.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yup, there was some mention about its unusual 3:2 aspect ratio in reviews. Which means 1920x1280. Someone was probably "correcting" what they thought was a conflation of the more usual 1920x1080 and 1920x1200 resolutions.
so what do you guys do for wallpapers?
any 1920x1280 or 1920x1200 image? or soemthing else, since the screens slide horizontally and rotate and stuff.
MrPresident said:
so what do you guys do for wallpapers?
any 1920x1280 or 1920x1200 image? or soemthing else, since the screens slide horizontally and rotate and stuff.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You actually need something even bigger so your launcher screens can shift. There are some on the device too.
My friend, @Xicor Yagami , showed me the leaked photos of the Nexus 7 2nd version a few hours ago and like him, I also liked the wallpaper very much.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Although I do not know whether its a Simple Wallpaper or a Live Wallpaper, I decided to make a simple one and kind of cloned the wallpaper.
I made it in several sizes. So you can download the one matching your device the closest.
1920x1280 px
720x1280 px
720x320 px
640x480 px
240x320 px
Enjoy!
Here's the Photoshop template in case anyone wants to play around with this, make any other sizes, work on this more or whatever you wish, you can do with this.
Download here.
cool idea!
@EatHeat these are fantastic although I expect the shadows on the left and right in the original screenshot are because of the fact the android launcher applies a shadow to the wallpaper rather than a shadow being part of the wallpaper image itself... If that makes any sense whatsoever :silly: anyway I'm just nitpicking, thanks for these
sorry for cutting in like that, just want to share my versions
HTCDreamOn said:
@EatHeat these are fantastic although I expect the shadows on the left and right in the original screenshot are because of the fact the android launcher applies a shadow to the wallpaper rather than a shadow being part of the wallpaper image itself... If that makes any sense whatsoever :silly: anyway I'm just nitpicking, thanks for these
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That thought completely escaped me. Thanks for pointing it out. I will upload the shadowless wallpaper after school today as well as the psd file so anyone can play with it.
yackovsky said:
sorry for cutting in like that, just want to share my versions
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
They look cool.
And I don't mind anyone sharing their versions here. After all, we are all making this from our point of view.
They a re all look good! But can somebody make a version in 720x1280 resolution for my 4x?
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda premium
IceTeaDestroyer said:
They a re all look good! But can somebody make a version in 720x1280 resolution for my 4x?
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Added to OP.
Also uploaded the psd file. Check 2nd post.
Hi. I had a question about the "493dpi" versions of some ROMs I've seen. Basically, what's to gain by using a 493 dpi ROM? I read one of the nexus phones has native 493, but the system sets it to 560 or so. Why would they do that? Is something similar going on with the xt1254? Basically if someone could give me a cliff notes version of what the heck this is about, if appreciate it. Thanks!
elderlypunk said:
Hi. I had a question about the "493dpi" versions of some ROMs I've seen. Basically, what's to gain by using a 493 dpi ROM? I read one of the nexus phones has native 493, but the system sets it to 560 or so. Why would they do that? Is something similar going on with the xt1254? Basically if someone could give me a cliff notes version of what the heck this is about, if appreciate it. Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think it's supposed to save battery at the cost of image quality. I'm not sure about that though. Why someone would want to do anything to mess up the Turbo's beautiful screen is beyond me, but to each their own.
Right? Granted I had some crummy phones in the past, but this display is something else! Anyways, I figured it has to have something to do with "pretty" vs. performance (what doesn't?), but I am operating from a position of ignorance.
elderlypunk said:
Hi. I had a question about the "493dpi" versions of some ROMs I've seen. Basically, what's to gain by using a 493 dpi ROM? I read one of the nexus phones has native 493, but the system sets it to 560 or so. Why would they do that? Is something similar going on with the xt1254? Basically if someone could give me a cliff notes version of what the heck this is about, if appreciate it. Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We actually have 640 dpi for the Quark (Moto Turbo, Droid Turbo, Moto Maxx). Dots Per Inch, which is software based.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
We have 565 ppi (Pixel Per Inch)-- which shows Steve Jobs LIED when he said the human eye couldn't see more than 300 ppi. But then he had an iPhone to sell which had a little more than 300 ppi. Funny how that works. Most of the media never called him on it except for Wired magazine who interviewed an optical research scientist who said Jobs was full of crap (but he said it in a scientific way). Proof is our phones.
You can change the DPI but not the PPI (baked into the hardware). But it will break some apps. I've done it before on other phones, but I wouldn't do it any more.