Related
Hi,
This is a small CWM zip to add the [email protected] line to your existing boot and recovery partitions to fix the ram issue with the international unlocked bootloader. If the second mem is already there it does nothing.
The point of this is you can have a regular recovery flashed and fix the ram issue without wondering what tegra part you have, it preserves your serial number as well. More useful with stock boot images than custom ones that already have this done.
To use:
Flash with a CWM recovery supporting edify scripting. That means you have an unlocked recovery basically.The program inside the zip can be used on it's own to list the cmdlines already in your phone, or to set them to something else.
As cmdline, it lists, as setcmdline it sets the entire thing, as addcmdline it adds on to the end of the existing cmdline.Cheers!
Great! Looks like our bell friends are having good development as well.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App
NF, cheers bro I really appreciate the work from you.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App
So would i need to flash this once and then any ROM I install will have fixed RAM, or do I need to flash this after every installation?
IUH1991 said:
So would i need to flash this once and then any ROM I install will have fixed RAM, or do I need to flash this after every installation?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can just keep it handy on your sdcard and use when needed, it depends on the "rom" you flash, it may or may not have a ram fix solution built in.
Cheers!
J-Roc said:
NF, cheers bro I really appreciate the work from you.
Sent from my MB860 using XDA Premium App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're welcome.
Cheers!
NFHimself said:
You can just keep it handy on your sdcard and use when needed, it depends on the "rom" you flash, it may or may not have a ram fix solution built in.
Cheers!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It depends on the Kernel the Rom has within it, nothing else.
Furthermore, no offense. But this is kinda useless now. Did you not know we have unified Kernel's? If someone made a Rom without a unified kernel, they can basically shove that Rom.
I do not see a point in this at all. I guess maybe for testing old Roms.....
NFHimself said:
You can just keep it handy on your sdcard and use when needed, it depends on the "rom" you flash, it may or may not have a ram fix solution built in.
Cheers!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So solid man, keep up the good work!
nexxusty said:
It depends on the Kernel the Rom has within it, nothing else.
Furthermore, no offense. But this is kinda useless now. Did you not know we have unified Kernel's? If someone made a Rom without a unified kernel, they can basically shove that Rom.
I do not see a point in this at all. I guess maybe for testing old Roms.....
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi,
I addressed this already in the OP. It's more for use with stock kernels.
Can you compile the motorola kernel source (pick one) and get a binary exact match for the stock Bell kernel?
No offense to the guys working on kernel's here, but I am not really compelled by the added features/bug fixes, and am concerned more about stability, especially when the source seems to be ATT based. Which is fine if you are running an ATT framework "rom/theme" I guess, even better if you have an ATT phone.
Cheers!
NFHimself said:
Hi,
This is a small CWM zip to add the [email protected] line to your existing boot and recovery partitions to fix the ram issue with the international unlocked bootloader. If the second mem is already there it does nothing.
The point of this is you can have a regular recovery flashed and fix the ram issue without wondering what tegra part you have, it preserves your serial number as well. More useful with stock boot images than custom ones that already have this done.
To use:
Flash with a CWM recovery supporting edify scripting. That means you have an unlocked recovery basically.The program inside the zip can be used on it's own to list the cmdlines already in your phone, or to set them to something else.
As cmdline, it lists, as setcmdline it sets the entire thing, as addcmdline it adds on to the end of the existing cmdline.Cheers!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hi is this fix for when i flash IHOP and get ram problem it fix that or its universal for every kernel (Gb froyo ROMs etc) ?
so does this mean it is actually possible to download more ram??
xateeq said:
Hi is this fix for when i flash IHOP and get ram problem it fix that or its universal for every kernel (Gb froyo ROMs etc) ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, what you said.
Cheers!
geishroy said:
so does this mean it is actually possible to download more ram??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Uhm, what?
Cheers!
geishroy said:
so does this mean it is actually possible to download more ram??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Download more RAM? Umm...did you even read this before you posted it? or do you know absolutely nothing about what RAM is?
geishroy said:
so does this mean it is actually possible to download more ram??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So many people don't understand what Ram actually is *sigh*
You're not the first, I see it EVERYWHERE, google it up!
Thanks a lot, because i was having ram issue with eternity project kernel, and your patch solve it !
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
dnsdenis said:
Thanks a lot, because i was having ram issue with eternity project kernel, and your patch solve it !
Sent from my MB860 using XDA App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Glad it worked out!
Cheers!
System Ram lists 816 total, so I should be in the clear or should I apply it anyways? Is there not a gig of ram on this thing or is some gpu/frame buffer dedicated?
drolgnir said:
System Ram lists 816 total, so I should be in the clear or should I apply it anyways? Is there not a gig of ram on this thing or is some gpu/frame buffer dedicated?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You are in the clear.
Cheers!
So, if I understand this correctly, when I flash this it will auto-fix any ROM, kernel or custom recovery that I install?
This guide is good? There are risks? If it's ok I start work: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1574332
Fedefriffo said:
This guide is good? There are risks? If it's ok I start work: http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1574332
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Best wishes !! :good:
Btw, this tool is great (http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1241005) for unpacking/repacking boot.img
Anyways, its all personal choice.
coolsandie said:
Best wishes !! :good:
Btw, this tool is great (http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1241005) for unpacking/repacking boot.img
Anyways, its all personal choice.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Using these does the same? (winzoz) :http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1494036
imho it's too much work for you only...I suggest you to look for some help...I'm afraid i'm not into this so i'm unhelpful...by the way, best wishes!!!
Asbusto said:
imho it's too much work for you only...I suggest you to look for some help...I'm afraid i'm not into this so i'm unhelpful...by the way, best wishes!!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have much free time (TT) but if someone wants to help is welcome
EDIT: Just one question, from which phone should I begin the port?
Fedefriffo said:
Using these does the same? (winzoz) :http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1494036
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, its the same.
coolsandie said:
Yes, its the same.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks
i can help
But before starting with Kernel v3, I'd suggest be comfortable with those commands and compile existing 2.6.35 kernels without modifications and later with modifications. In that way, you could get more in touch with Kernel development.
Maybe these guides will help for reference :
- http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1467149
- http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1748297
- http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1186409
Messi10 said:
i can help
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks .. For now I have to decide what to bring kernel.
Any advice?
I thought this: Here
Or this: Here
coolsandie said:
But before starting with Kernel v3, I'd suggest be comfortable with those commands and compile existing 2.6.35 kernels without modifications and later with modifications. In that way, you could get more in touch with Kernel development.
Maybe these guides will help for reference :
- http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1467149
- http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1748297
- http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1186409
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I think I'd better use a kernel already done ... I send a pm to mebitek
It's not worth it, you will have to forward-port a lot of things :/ Better take 2.6.xx.xx and backport stuff from msm3.0 kernel
TheWhisp said:
It's not worth it, you will have to forward-port a lot of things :/ Better take 2.6.xx.xx and backport stuff from msm3.0 kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Want to put the satisfaction of having the 3.0 kernel? XD I know it will be long but at least I tried
http://www.itworld.com/software/169503/new-linux-30-kernel-same-old-kernel
http://www.h-online.com/open/features/What-s-new-in-Linux-3-0-1279552.html
i suggest u din't waste your time building 3.0 kernel, i suggest u build CMW 6
Messi10 said:
http://www.itworld.com/software/169503/new-linux-30-kernel-same-old-kernel
http://www.h-online.com/open/features/What-s-new-in-Linux-3-0-1279552.html
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There are no changes from 2.6.40 to version 3, but from 2.6.35 to version 3 are
EDIT: For CWM 6:http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1788452
Fedefriffo said:
There are no changes from 2.6.40 to version 3, but from 2.6.35 to version 3 are
EDIT: For CWM 6:http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=1788452
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
for CWM 6 press Build Artifacts then all files in zip
Messi10 said:
for CWM 6 press Build Artifacts then all files in zip
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
And to make an installable zip?
I am faced with this screen
you need to flash recovery.img
only recovery.img?
i made a flashable zip
testing...
EDIT: is there any chance to brick because i don't want to brick my phone???
so im just starting this thread now so i have it ready wehen i finish out all the bugs. but this is a custom kernel for the d415. So the caf lsk kernel source was harder than e pecred because of lg mods. So I patched our stock kernel to 3.14 and I'm building off that
#added CPU GOVENORS (smartassv2 lulzactive interactivex)
#added SIO I/O scheduler
#tweaks for better speed and security
if you have anyother govenors or schedulers or feature suggestions let me know and ill try to make it happen
My source will be uploaded to my github later today and will be updated as much as possible. You can find that at github.com/demonslayer12349
I think batlin got USB OTG, if you could too it would be great.
Also a custom kernel for stock ROM is a good one. If that isn't already your idea.
@up
It was Mahdi On-The-Go feature, not OTG
Nice maybe you could explain. How you did it ?? On lg site are updated kernel sources for my d405 available !
Or did it actual not compile in your case ??
Greets......
judas1977 said:
@up
It was Mahdi On-The-Go feature, not OTG
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Sorry thought that because USB OTG means just that too on-the-go.
Disrupthor said:
Sorry thought that because USB OTG means just that too on-the-go.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
shoxxy said:
Nice maybe you could explain. How you did it ?? On lg site are updated kernel sources for my d405 available !
Or did it actual not compile in your case ??
Greets......
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
judas1977 said:
@up
It was Mahdi On-The-Go feature, not OTG
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
just an update fo4r you guys im still working on it but its being annoying with flashing it through recovery so i will get it working and released as soon as possible my new base is LSK 3.14 for msm from CAF
I tryed quarx actual kernel and it seems everything works on D405/n but for sure every new work is interesting Darian
greets
Hey cap, im a ceash test dummy and i will try ANYTHING at least once. Shoot me a beta to test if ou are so inclined. I just (aparently) unlocked thos boptloadee.
whodisname said:
Hey cap, im a ceash test dummy and i will try ANYTHING at least once. Shoot me a beta to test if ou are so inclined. I just (aparently) unlocked thos boptloadee.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Might take you up on that. Almost have a bets
demonslayer12349 said:
Might take you up on that. Almost have a bets
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I am willing to beta test as well.
! Im on stock and i dont really like that. Just let me know! Still ready to risk my device for the cause! I got a backup phone and everything (you know, justin case)!!!
sweet i almost have it ready.
C'mon bro, don't let it whoop ya!!! :beer:
Closed per OP request
Hi everyone,
Are there still any kernel developers present for our device?
It would be possible to have Xperia Sony SP 4.4.4 Kitkat, but we need to develop a kernel for that.
DeathZeroFx is also busy making it, but I was wondering if there are more people who are interested.
Deleunes254 said:
Hi everyone,
Are there still any kernel developers present for our device?
It would be possible to have Xperia Sony SP 4.4.4 Kitkat, but we need to develop a kernel for that.
DeathZeroFx is also busy making it, but I was wondering if there are more people who are interested.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We already have many people working behind the kernel building. Sad to say, its very difficult to port it as its closed source
Furrydaus said:
We already have many people working behind the kernel building. Sad to say, its very difficult to port it as its closed source
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hmmm...I hope you and other devs will succeed :s It would be awesome to have that kernel and thus a stock 4.4 rom
Deleunes254 said:
Hmmm...I hope you and other devs will succeed :s It would be awesome to have that kernel and thus a stock 4.4 rom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can ask the kernel developers. If i recall there was one that was trying to do what you're doing. Its In-progress. You should look for GamerR or smtgh
Deleunes254 said:
Hi everyone,
Are there still any kernel developers present for our device?
It would be possible to have Xperia Sony SP 4.4.4 Kitkat, but we need to develop a kernel for that.
DeathZeroFx is also busy making it, but I was wondering if there are more people who are interested.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Since we do have cm11(4.4.4) I don't understand what changes are needed as the base kernel would remain the same(3.4.y). Atmost it would need ramdisk changes. Drivers and blobs are @4.3 and since proprietary can't really change.
Furrydaus said:
We already have many people working behind the kernel building. Sad to say, its very difficult to port it as its closed source
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Kernel is open source what's this about porting the official 4.4 Xperia rom ?
Dark Passenger said:
Since we do have cm11(4.4.4) I don't understand what changes are needed as the base kernel would remain the same(3.4.y). Atmost it would need ramdisk changes. Drivers and blobs are @4.3 and since proprietary can't really change.
Kernel is open source what's this about porting the official 4.4 Xperia rom ?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Libs and stuff that im too lazy to care about XD
Furrydaus said:
You can ask the kernel developers. If i recall there was one that was trying to do what you're doing. Its In-progress. You should look for GamerR or smtgh
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for answering. I knew about the one of Gamer R but he seems to have abandonded the project, cause there hasn't been a post update for months...
You think it would be possible mr Furrydaus?
Deleunes254 said:
Thanks for answering. I knew about the one of Gamer R but he seems to have abandonded the project, cause there hasn't been a post update for months...
You think it would be possible mr Furrydaus?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its propably cos of all the lollipop hype and things. I think we will wait till Sony release their Lollipop Stock Firmware. Thatll be more exciting that the kitkat version
Furrydaus said:
Its propably cos of all the lollipop hype and things. I think we will wait till Sony release their Lollipop Stock Firmware. Thatll be more exciting that the kitkat version
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Allright! Thanks for keeping me up to date!
hi all
for those impatient and dare to try, plus able to handle problems ON YOUR OWN as i cannot offer any help at this point:
anyone interested to test an updated version of BeastMode Kernel R154 by @freeza with the latest samsung firmware N960FXXU8FUD1?
please be noted that:
- this might be EXTREMELY DANGEROUS or could BRICK YOUR PHONE in a few seconds, and I am not responsible for bricked devices or any damages which may arise. so, you have been WARNED
- I have NOT TESTED on my n960f yet (just updated to TH4 from pie but not rooted yet for some reasons). SO THINK TWICE!!
- chances the phone may not boot up properly (boot loop or hang) due to the toolchains used to compile the kernel. I have encoutered this before with only one of the four or five gcc i had which booted up the phone successfully
ideal situation to minimize uncertainties:
- already on ud1
- data/cache partition is ext4 formatted (ideally NOT f2fs as supported by bm kernel)
- capable of diagnostic/identify the problems by examining the logcat/last_kmsg and the like would defintely a plus
to be continued...
Hello, Is this gonna work on newer BL version? FUE5 version, also @CyderXDA would wanna try it, but he's on newer BL. We also have Exynos9810 Telegram Chat, there's N9/S9/S9+ users in there that maybe could test for you and stuff if you're interested
JC1126 said:
Hello, Is this gonna work on newer BL version? FUE5 version, also @CyderXDA would wanna try it, but he's on newer BL. We also have Exynos9810 Telegram Chat, there's N9/S9/S9+ users in there that maybe could test for you and stuff if you're interested
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hi
samsung has just posted a newer firmware N960FXXS8FUE5, probably hours ago, i am going to update it first. will let you guys know
thanks for your interests
ykkfive said:
hi
samsung has just posted a newer firmware N960FXXS8FUE5, probably hours ago, i am going to update it first. will let you guys know
thanks for your interests
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright Goodluck!
JC1126 said:
Alright Goodluck!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
update 20160616
updated to samsung ue5 sources
i have built 2 different versions, one with gcc 4.9 and the other with gcc 12. there will be only one version in the future (either gcc4 or 12). the reason i built 2 versions this time is in case one of the gcc used doesnt boot probably there's another one to try
differences between @freeza 's R154:
- kernel sources updated (N960F) without any fix or new feature
- not pre-rooted/pre-patched by magisk since the magisk version may differs from what u r using
- NOTE: other devices preiously supported are not recommeded yet, although you may try, i cant make any promise it will work since i didnt look at other devices sources
thinking if i should release it for testing now or wait until i have time to test it myself coz i don want to brick anyone's phone, including mine of coz
ykkfive said:
update 20160616
updated to samsung ue5 sources
i have built 2 different versions, one with gcc 4.9 and the other with gcc 12. there will be only one version in the future (either gcc4 or 12). the reason i built 2 versions this time is in case one of the gcc used doesnt boot probably there's another one to try
differences between @freeza 's R154:
- kernel sources updated without any fix or new feature
- not pre-rooted/pre-patched by magisk since the magisk version may differs from what u r using
- f2fs supported as R154 (cache/data)
thinking if i should release it for testing now or wait until i have time to test it myself coz i don want to brick anyone's phone, including mine of coz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Holy that's insane, you added f2fs that's exciting, wonder if it supports AOSP because most of n9 users use aosp, some use noblerom
JC1126 said:
Holy that's insane, you added f2fs that's exciting, wonder if it supports AOSP because most of n9 users use aosp, some use noblerom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i didnt add anything new, but i found in his fstab, f2fs is ready. i didnt examine the kernel sources yet. this it true for aosp etc also
so in case f2fs/aosp etc was supported in his R154, it should be, i believe...
sorry, but NO f2fs there in his kernel!!
ykkfive said:
i didnt add anything new, but i found in his fstab, f2fs is ready. i didnt examine the kernel sources yet. this it true for aosp etc also
so in case f2fs/aosp etc was supported in his R154, it should be, i believe...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that's cool, can't wait to try it out in lineage a11 lol
JC1126 said:
that's cool, can't wait to try it out in lineage a11 lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i just checked the output, there's no f2fs unfortunately but i can add it later after test
ykkfive said:
i just checked the output, there's no f2fs unfortunately
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that's still fine tbh, not much difference on ext4, good thing is it works on aosp, idk if it'll boot on oneui3.1 because it needs a permissive kernel to boot so yeah
JC1126 said:
that's still fine tbh, not much difference on ext4, good thing is it works on aosp, idk if it'll boot on oneui3.1 because it needs a permissive kernel to boot so yeah
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
tbf i have not built one with both sammy and aosp supported kernel, and i even don't know his kernel supports aosp
for the one ui 3.1 thing, u mean the ported one? i believe he's made it to run on existing kernel so it should be fine. of coz it needs to be tested first
ykkfive said:
tbf i have not built one with both sammy and aosp supported kernel, and i even don't know his kernel supports aosp
for the one ui 3.1 thing, u mean the ported one? i believe he's made it to run on existing kernel so it should be fine. of coz it needs to be tested first
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ohh alright then
update 20210618
the ue5 kernel works properly so far, tested on stock rom only due to unable to get a ue5 custom rom atm
will be released soon
thanks a lot
released, closed