Source: https://translate.google.com/transl...Samsung_GALAXY_Note_4.html&edit-text=&act=url
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Smaller Delta E is better in above figure.
Not to forget, Note 4 will have infinite contrast and much black levels compared to iPhone 6.
Comparable brightness characteristics: maximum brightness Samsung was 334 cd / m 2 , if we talk about white fill the entire screen. But if the area of the white filling is reduced to at least 50%, the brightness is clearly growing - already up to 370 cd / m 2 . As it turned out, this is not the limit! If we translate the screen to automatically adjust the brightness and smartphone will be exposed to bright light (eg the sun) - that the brightness can grow to an impressive 620 cd / m 2 . Add to that the excellent efficacy of anti-reflective coating and conditionally "infinite" contrast AMOLED zero black - and you get an amazing combination.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The average color temperature Note 4 close to the reference value of 6500K. Note 4 color balance in the "main" is set perfectly. Most eloquently confirmed by the mean value of the error Delta E value of 1.07 units.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The average color temperature iPhone 6 Plus - about 7400K. Color balance shows that the image has a light bluish tint. The average error of Delta E on the gray scale - 8.5 units. Deviations tint get higher than that of the screen Note 4.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Color gamut Note 4 in the "main" fully complies with sRGB, without any discounts and errors. Moreover, the intermediate color values lie practically on the reference values - the minimum error. Total score of 24 color patterns ColorChecker gives an average error of Delta E value of only 1.22 units.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Overall Score color iPhone 6 Plus 24 templates ColorChecker gives the average error in the Delta E value of 3.52 units. Factory setting of color adequate, though not without some flaws.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Galaxy Note 4, almost perfect:
iPhone 6 Plus, not so perfect!
Did I mentioned about contrast and black level yet? :victory:
Now for the last freaking time, AMOLED displays are not inaccurate!!
CLARiiON said:
Now for the last freaking time, AMOLED displays are not inaccurate!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
NO, not anymore. I like the max brightness level, that's a factor I will look at now after my disappointing screen brightness on my LG G3.
Another nail on the coffin
http://displaymate.com/iPhone6_ShootOut.htm
http://www.displaymate.com/Galaxy_Note4_ShootOut_1.htm
Dr. Raymond Soneira of DisplayMate conducted a test to see just how much Apple has improved its smartphone display since the iPhone 5 was released in 2012. According to Soneira's*iPhone 6 Display Technology Shootout, the iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus have the best LCD displays of any smartphone on the market.
Soneira praised the iPhone 6's display after his testing, but it wasn't enough to steal the title of "Best Overall Smartphone Display" from Samsung's Galaxy Note 4.
Soneira says the Galaxy Note 4 matches or breaks records in smartphone display performance in categories such as highest absolute color accuracy, highest screen resolution, and highest peak brightness, among other areas. Although Apple's new smartphones come with the best displays of their kind, Soneira believes the Galaxy Note 4's display is generally better.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
source
From article: http://displaymate.com/iPhone6_ShootOut.htm
We recently gave the Samsung Galaxy Note 4 our overall Best Smartphone Display award, and for the time being that continues for all of the reasons originally mentioned there. In particular, for implementing Color Management to provide multiple Color Gamuts, and then using the Color Management to provide the Highest Absolute Color Accuracy for Standard (sRGB/Rec.709) consumer content of any Smartphone or Tablet display that we have ever measured
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Related
So Tweakers have run their test and have discovered that the N5 has some of the most accurate colour of any phone ever!
http://translate.google.co.uk/trans...s-schermkwaliteit-scherp-en-dik-in-orde.html
(Page has been translated for you).
I agree after having it for two days. The display is amazing. I thought it was washed out since I was coming from the G2 and note 3. But after my eyes adjusting for the past 2 days it truly is awesome.
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
I was just comparing Note 3 vs N5 and thought the same thing. Little washed out, but almost refreshing to the eyes that it's not so over saturated.
Sent from my SM-N9005 using Tapatalk
Coming from a Nexus 4 I really love the screen and there is a noticeable difference between them! It's like it feels very easy on the eyes.
Yes, our poor eyes have been hurt by these over saturated amoled [email protected] for ages, it's time for a change. We need accurate colours on our screen. Apple devices are the best in terms of colour accuracy and it's good see android devices catching up. Actually, HTC One is regarded as having the best overall screen if you read Anandtech's review.
Sent from my Nexus 7 using xda app-developers app
AppReviewBros said:
Coming from a Nexus 4 I really love the screen and there is a noticeable difference between them! It's like it feels very easy on the eyes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea when I compared the screen on the N4 to my N5 I was like:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Like I suspected, contrast is worse than on the N4. To be honest, I'd trade some color accuracy for better contrast and/or better viewing angles. Especially on a mobile device where color accuracy is not critical.
Jockson said:
Like I suspected, contrast is worse than on the N4. To be honest, I'd trade some color accuracy for better contrast and/or better viewing angles. Especially on a mobile device where color accuracy is not critical.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Viewing angles are critical? 99.9% of the time I'm looking at it straight on. I'd rather have accurate color, thanks
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
666fff said:
So Tweakers have run their test and have discovered that the N5 has some of the most accurate colour of any phone ever!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Agreed, it's a massive improvement on the Nexus 4. Here's my measurement report using my iDisplay3 colorimeter & Chromapure
'Pre-Cal' = Nexus 4 (stock)
'Post-Cal' = Nexus 5 (stock)
Calibration report
very impressive, and is very similar to the one tested above. I could tweak the green down a bit - and dE2000 number (a standard measure of the error) over 3.0 needs to be tweaked.
The Nexus 4 was one of the poorest displays ever produced last year. Man that was horrible. Staring at the Nexus 5's screen is pretty noticeable difference.
Sent from my Nexus 5
http://www.phonearena.com/reviews/Google-Nexus-5-Review_id3479
Here's another review of the Nexus 5, look at the color comparison charts. You can add phones to the chart and check out their ratings, color accuracy compared to target colors, etc. I'm definitely going to look at this later tonight.
Also, I was just in the mall and a kiosk had a Nexus 5 on display. Naturally, I immediately gravitated to it and compared it to my Galaxy S4 Active. I set both phones on max brightness, and set my GS4A's screen mode to 'Movie', supposedly the most accurate and least saturated mode. The color accuracy of the Nexus 5 is better than my GS4A by a small but noticeable amount, but the whites seemed (by comparison) slightly more yellow and warmer. Is that what's known as a more natural white? My GS4A's whites tend to be colder and slightly more bluish by comparison.
I'm coming from a Galaxy Nexus which had such a grainy screen that it felt like I was looking at a newspaper almost. Whites were yellow & blacks were purple sometimes. That was a truly hideous screen. The Nexus 5 screen blows my mind in comparison(obviously). People say it's washed out, but I kind of like it when compared to the PLS display on my Note 10.1 which I actually really like as well.
[hfm] said:
Viewing angles are critical? 99.9% of the time I'm looking at it straight on. I'd rather have accurate color, thanks
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Software can fix color accuracy but it can't fix viewing angles.
The display is decent but I would have actually preferred a shrunken version of the screen on the nexus 7 2013. It has much better contrast and MUCH better view angles. I wouldn't have minded if the nexus 5 was 323 ppi if it had those characteristics. You can't see the pixels on the nexus 7 anyway.
---------- Post added at 12:48 PM ---------- Previous post was at 12:47 PM ----------
Jockson said:
Like I suspected, contrast is worse than on the N4. To be honest, I'd trade some color accuracy for better contrast and/or better viewing angles. Especially on a mobile device where color accuracy is not critical.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I agree. I wish they had gone with an IPS panel with an A/TW polarizer like the nexus 7 2013 has.
A/TW IPS vs regular IPS
Maybe it's just me but I really can't tell the difference between the screens aside the fact that the nexus 5 has better whites
I have used AMOLEDS and I actually returned to a note 2 cos the 3 was too expensive and I don't like the S4. All the screen talk made me buy a nexus 5 but honestly, I regret it.
I have kitkat features installed on my note 2...compare screens, aside the yellowish tint with amoleds, i really dont know what the fuss is about. Are your eyes that sensitive or mine isn;t just good ?
I'm still waiting for the colour comparison of this YouTuber. www.youtube.com/user/TheAngelofmusic1989
Her videos are incredibly detailed, no joke it goes for an hour. She made some good screen colour comparison for the s4 and HTC one I think.
Sent from my Nexus 7
Galaxy Note 4 Vs Galaxy S5
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Hey all
I thought it may be an idea to create a thread to compare Samsung's two current flagship devices, the Note 4 and S5. While we usually see these two flagships announced at the same time, this year we have best part of a six month gap. For me the S-Pen is a must, which is why I've stuck with the note series since the original. But how much of a deal breaker is this for others?
Design
Next we have the exterior, its great to see Samsung finally embrace a metal finish. The note 3 had a metallic looking strip around the edge, while sure it looked good, the feel of it was always a disappointment. The note 4 fixes this by using the real deal around the exterior edge, giving much more of a premium feel. The S5 sticks with the same plastic fantastic approach, but is smaller and easier to handle due to its more rounded design. Although the use of metal gives the note 4 more of a high-end device look and feel, would anybody take the S5 due to its reduced size and weight?
Display
While we're on the subject of size, it brings us to the display. Both devices use the same SAMOLED technology, just the Note 4's being considerably larger. This is to be expected as they are aimed at different audiences.The Note 4’s 5.7-inch 2,560 x 1,440 pixel display gets you pixel density of 515ppi, compared to the S5's 5.1-inch 1080 x 1920 pixels screen bringing 432ppi. Anything over 350ppi will give a sharp display, and its still in debate if these massive resolutions are of any actual benefit to screens of this size. What would members thoughts be on this be?
Performace
So the nitty-gritty, which is faster? As we have different versions of both devices, we will stick to the Quad core versions as its the one we will see in the UK. Both use very similar Quad core chipsets, the Snapdragon 801 running at 2.5GHz in the S5 and a Snapdragon 805 at 2.7GHz in the Note 4, both are very snappy processors and will perform well, but its hardly a massive leap when we take the time period that's passed. The real difference is in GPU power, the Note 4 packs an Adreno 420 which is claimed to be around 40% faster than the S5's Adreno 330, of course the Note 4 has a lot more pixels to "push" so how this equates to real world performance is yet to be seen. On the face of it we have two very similar devices in way of performance, it may be down to if you like playing games etc. Looking forward to members thoughts on this:good:
Camera
Both devices come with 16 MP sensors, but we have a big difference, the S5 uses one made by Samsung featuring its ISOCELL technology, while the Note 4 uses a Sony IMX240 sensor. Quite why this has happened is a mystery, but we can only speculate that its down to production, possibly working on the S6's new camera?
While the Note 4's camera may be lagging somewhat behind the S5's due to the use of the more traditional camera technology, both are likely to perform well. One thing the S5 lacks is optical image stabilization, this should give the Note 4 an edge in low-light snaps. On the flip-side, the S5 has hybrid phase detection auto-focus, this is used in DSLR cameras and is quicker than the pure contrast detection auto-focus used in the Note 4.
Summary
Two high-end smartphones, both with their benefits. Please post why you would pick one over the other. Would the size and price of the Note 4 be a put-off and S5's reduced price but similar performance appeal?
This thread has been permitted by the moderation team, and is intend for sensible discussions comparing these two devices and their features. Any trolling or flaming will be reported to the moderation team and dealt with.
Are we sure the note 4's camera doesn't have phase detect AF as well?
Sent from my SM-G900H using Tapatalk
How well do you know your fifty shades of grey? Rate this thread to express how good the LG V20's display contrast is. A higher rating indicates that black is true black, rather than a very dark gray.
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Definitely not a Note 7, which sets the standard for true blacks. I'll bet this screen is easier on the battery.
douger1957 said:
Definitely not a Note 7, which sets the standard for true blacks. I'll bet this screen is easier on the battery.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm going to disagree. The Note7 is a standard for "true black" because it is actually true black. An LED/OLED/AMOLED/etc display accomplishes black by simply shutting off an LED pixel, thus creating a 100% TRUE black. (Also, LED being off is using 0 energy).
LCD's on the other hand require backlighting, thus anytime the screen is on, the entire thing is lit. This is why no LCD will ever accomplish a 100% true black. It's also the reason why LCD's tend to be more of a battery hog because all pixels, even black ones, require lighting which requires energy.
To see the difference, put an AMOLED and LCD screen phone beside each other in a dark room and do a google image search for 000000, click one of the results and view it full screen. The AMOLED phone will appear to be off and the LCD phone will still be giving off light.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
from phonearena.com
I don't know if everybody know this but the note 7 is irrelevant.
techrider6262 said:
I don't know if everybody know this but the note 7 is irrelevant.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
DING DING DING We have a winner!!!!
Note 4 Note 7 no difference for this discussion same AMOLED panel.
the LGv20 has a nice screen. very nice screen in fact (I now have one) it is not REMOTELY as good as my note 4 screen.
way way way to high a color temp on the panel. its damned near blue. not remotely white. when I use low warming it helps a little but not much. you get used to it but you really really notice in large areas of white.
the blacks are ok but again. horrid if you are used to an oled panel. I hope LG puts an oled panel in the V30 since I know they have the tech (their oled televisions are drop dead sexy alas way way outside of anything remotely in my budget)
what helps is that it has the 1440p panel. this really is the ideal resolution for a 5.5 to 6 inch panel where 1080p is just lacking noticeably. you adjust to the high temperature you don't adjust to low resolution.
sadly so far the camera is crap at night. grrr. was hoping for better. have not really tested in in daytime yet though I expect it will be fine.
nerys71 said:
Note 4 Note 7 no difference for this discussion same AMOLED panel.
the LGv20 has a nice screen. very nice screen in fact (I now have one) it is not REMOTELY as good as my note 4 screen.
way way way to high a color temp on the panel. its damned near blue. not remotely white. when I use low warming it helps a little but not much. you get used to it but you really really notice in large areas of white.
the blacks are ok but again. horrid if you are used to an oled panel. I hope LG puts an oled panel in the V30 since I know they have the tech (their oled televisions are drop dead sexy alas way way outside of anything remotely in my budget)
what helps is that it has the 1440p panel. this really is the ideal resolution for a 5.5 to 6 inch panel where 1080p is just lacking noticeably. you adjust to the high temperature you don't adjust to low resolution.
sadly so far the camera is crap at night. grrr. was hoping for better. have not really tested in in daytime yet though I expect it will be fine.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
So turn down the blue. Nougat lets you.
Hmm.. Coming from a note 7... The 7 still has a better screen.. But increase brightness to 60 and up and it looks really great. Can't complain.
Yeah the blacks cant compare to my note 4 but at least the viewing angle is good enough. Dont notice any colour shift at any reasonable angle.
Sent from my LG-H990 using Tapatalk
Has anyone fiddled with the Color settings under Accessibility menu? I wonder if those would help.....anybody have success?
Zeromus2003 said:
Has anyone fiddled with the Color settings under Accessibility menu? I wonder if those would help.....anybody have success?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
There's already a thread all about it
It's not much of a thread tbh. I've just read it.
Amoled vs LCD. Note 4 vs V20. You win some you lose some. Having come from Amoled screens (Nexus 6, Note 4, etc) you get spoiled by blacks. However, the colors on the V20 are fantastic. I am a weekend pro photographer and can tell you I feel the V20 is way more natural than the over saturated colors of an Amoled screen. Also viewing angles on the V20 maintain colors while the Note 4 does not.
But back to black levels. This is good for an LCD screen and turning off the top display improves it a lot. The black level is good but it is a dark grey. But when you watch Netflix etc in the dark it is not bad at all. Not Amoled good but definitely not bad.
OK so having done some more watching with the lights totally off, I can say this is a disaster in terms of black levels. I watched 10 minutes of Lord Of The Rings and pretty much stopped.
Default setting - FHD.
I changed that to max setting.
Why Samsung decided not to use full screen potential in default settings? Can I expect bigger battery drain?
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
bat0nas said:
Default setting - FHD.
I changed that to max setting.
Why Samsung decided not to use full screen potential in default settings? Can I expect bigger battery drain?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, it will actually drain more. A good way to know how much you can save being on fhd. Set to max, then go to battery settings and choose any of the other two battery saver mode, next to each"setting" it should show how much time you save if those are toner off. It should show screen resolution, Bluetooth, background data, brightness, and more.
I use that only as a reference to see how much juice I can size based on the settings I have turned on.
Thanks.
Just did some comparison of different saving modes changing screen resolution and in my case FHD saves 7 minutes of battery time compared to WQHD.
So it doesn't make sense using lower resolution. It saves some battery but not that much to sacrifice the main part of the phone (the gorgeous screen).
bat0nas said:
Thanks.
Just did some comparison of different saving modes changing screen resolution and in my case FHD saves 7 minutes of battery time compared to WQHD.
So it doesn't make sense using lower resolution. It saves some battery but not that much to sacrifice the main part of the phone (the gorgeous screen).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well when you factor in screen brightness, that 7 minutes can jump to 45 minutes easily depending on if you're going outside and such. In my Note 8i used to run fhd with a 445dpi. Smooth and crisp and looked like wqhd as much as possible.
I've never seen a noticeable difference on my Note 8. Ran it for a week on mid level resolution, saw no difference in battery life so I turned it back up to the highest resolution. Each to their own, but I don't think the difference is enough either way. Run the one you are most comfortable looking at for icon and text size.
Anyone know why Samsung lowered the dpi compared to the n8?
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
Limeybastard said:
Anyone know why Samsung lowered the dpi compared to the n8?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
What's it set to on the 9?
Jammol said:
What's it set to on the 9?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm obviously getting senile in my old age. Was supposed to say PPI.
N9 is 516 , n8 is 521.
Was thinking they'd be increasing it for VR sakes?
Sent from my SM-N950U using Tapatalk
Note8 screen size 6,3 inch, note9 - 6,4 inch.
A bit bigger display, same resolution like old 1440p makes this insignificant difference
bat0nas said:
Default setting - FHD.
I changed that to max setting.
Why Samsung decided not to use full screen potential in default settings? Can I expect bigger battery drain?View attachment 4577833
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's done to prevent battery drain. Increasing it to full resolution won't make any noticeable difference in image quality. As far as battery drain it's really hard to say. The display will always be displaying the full 2960x1440. It really a matter of what uses more power: 1. Having the GPU render all the possible pixels or 2. Have the GPU render fewer pixels but have to upscale the image to the full 2960x1440. I'd be surprised if the difference was really that big. Although to squeeze as much battery life out as I could I'd probably set it to FHD just to squeeze out as much as I can. The full resolution is a waste anyways.
bat0nas said:
Default setting - FHD.
I changed that to max setting.
Why Samsung decided not to use full screen potential in default settings? Can I expect bigger battery drain?View attachment 4577833
Sent from my SM-N960F using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Must be new here cause samsung has been doing this since the galaxy s8. It suppost to save battery but really ot has been show almost no different what so ever. The ui and games are rendered at 1080+ i feel a little smoother if u look hard and the phone doesnt get has hot.
Hello,
I hope someone can help me.
I'm from germany and I bought a new note 9.
I own a 3 year old Huawei Mate 9 and the Mate 9 has a much brighter display as the new note 9 !!!!
I have ordered more note 9 and it's the same for everyone.
Energy saving is OFF... accu is set to Maximum Performance.
Why is that note9 darker than the three year old huawei ???
When I light up the note9 with a bright flashlight, the display becomes a little brighter again. But not brighter than the Mate 9.
can someone help me please?? (
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
steve197635 said:
Hello,
I hope someone can help me.
I'm from germany and I bought a new note 9.
I own a 3 year old Huawei Mate 9 and the Mate 9 has a much brighter display as the new note 9 !!!!
I have ordered more note 9 and it's the same for everyone.
Energy saving is OFF... accu is set to Maximum Performance.
Why is that note9 darker than the three year old huawei ???
When I light up the note9 with a bright flashlight, the display becomes a little brighter again. But not brighter than the Mate 9.
can someone help me please?? (
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
remove adaptive brightness?
to me anything over 40% seems way to bright anyways.
Yes it is on.
steve197635 said:
Yes it is on.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Turn off adaptive brightness
weren't i clear?
check Screen Mode in displays settings. if it is set to basic then it will be a yellowish or dim screen. set it to "Adaptive display".
Mate 9 use ips lcd right? So the display technology not the same. IPS need LED to backlight the screen hence its look brighter when on max brightness because it lit the whole screen. Note 9 using Amoled panel, every pixel capable of producing their own light. So the brightness intensity not the same. Plus i would not recommend using max brightness, it'll make screen burn in much faster on amoled panel.
nmlng said:
Mate 9 use ips lcd right? So the display technology not the same. IPS need LED to backlight the screen hence its look brighter when on max brightness because it lit the whole screen. Note 9 using Amoled panel, every pixel capable of producing their own light. So the brightness intensity not the same. Plus i would not recommend using max brightness, it'll make screen burn in much faster on amoled panel.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This, you cannot compare LCD with OLED like that, OLED is superior for a number of reasons but peak brightness is not one of them.
Displaymate test
Samsung managed to get the Note 9's full-screen peak display brightness to 710 nits,
I can tell you the Note 8 has a slightly brighter/whiter display than my Note 9. The Note 7 the same (I still have my Note 7). Side by side, same settings, the Note 9 display is not as bright or white as either of those two phones. It's not a huge deal, barely noticeable really, but side by side you can definitely tell the N9 is not quite as bright or white. And before anyone asks or suggests, of course the settings on all 3 were the same.