Related
Hi, guys!
Company LG released 2012 January 26 for the Russian firmware 20B based on the source code of 20o.
1) The kernel supports the swap.
2) There is a Google application Musik
3) GPS is working correctly, if you boot the phone, GPS has been disabled
4) Fixed problems connecting to Wi-Fi networks with more than 11 channels
at least, these changes appeared only in the firmware 20o, then with 99% probability of firmware 20b, at the moment is the latest.
http://csmg.lgmobile.com:9002/swdata/WEBSW/LGP990/ACISDW/V20B_00/V20B_00.kdz
Last-modified: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:04:40 GMT
PAIIITET said:
Hi, guys!
Company LG released 2012 January 26 for the Russian firmware 20B based on the source code of 20o.
1) The kernel supports the swap.
2) There is a Google application Musik
3) GPS is working correctly, if you boot the phone, GPS has been disabled
4) Fixed problems connecting to Wi-Fi networks with more than 11 channels
at least, these changes appeared only in the firmware 20o, then with 99% probability of firmware 20b, at the moment is the latest.
http://csmg.lgmobile.com:9002/swdata/WEBSW/LGP990/ACISDW/V20B_00/V20B_00.kdz
Last-modified: Thu, 26 Jan 2012 14:04:40 GMT
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If this is true, this will include the v20o baseband as well. Which can be extracted by flashing it with this tool, and look for the files in the temporary directory while flashing (AENEAS_FW.fls, psi.fls, R375_SIC.fls and slb.fls). How do you know it is based on v20o, since you are running it and can confirm the issues are not there? Or have you confirmed it some other way?
wapz said:
If this is true, this will include the v20o baseband as well. Which can be extracted by flashing it with this tool, and look for the files in the temporary directory while flashing (AENEAS_FW.fls, psi.fls, R375_SIC.fls and slb.fls). How do you know it is based on v20o, since you are running it and can confirm the issues are not there? Or have you confirmed it some other way?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have extracted the baseband files from the CIS v20b KDZ. They are different sized files from V20m baseband, but still show as baseband 1035.21_20110725
The build.prop says ro.build.date=Wed Jan 25 15:02:00 MSK 2012, so it looks like it is the most recent build to be released. I'll leave it to one of the experts to do all the deodexing etc...
Editied to put the RIL in the zip along with the fls files.
rmein said:
I have extracted the baseband files from the CIS v20b KDZ. They are different sized files from V20m baseband, but still show as baseband 1035.21_20110725
The build.prop says ro.build.date=Wed Jan 25 15:02:00 MSK 2012, so it looks like it is the most recent build to be released. I'll leave it to one of the experts to do all the deodexing etc...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, mate.
If you still have the ROM in your phone, can you please upload the RIL as well - if you don't mind?
rmein said:
I have extracted the baseband files from the CIS v20b KDZ. They are different sized files from V20m baseband, but still show as baseband 1035.21_20110725
The build.prop says ro.build.date=Wed Jan 25 15:02:00 MSK 2012, so it looks like it is the most recent build to be released. I'll leave it to one of the experts to do all the deodexing etc...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Now, if anybody could try and flash the bb, and see if you can get Fastdormancy complete with any of the v20o roms + ril out there it would mean I can finally leave my old v20m rom alone. Don't have time for this today
Divyan said:
Thanks, mate.
If you still have the ROM in your phone, can you please upload the RIL as well - if you don't mind?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I only flashed the BB not the whole ROM, but I did extract the /system image as well. I've put the RIL in the original post along with the fls files.
rmein said:
I only flashed the BB not the whole ROM, but I did extract the /system image as well. I've put the RIL in the original post along with the fls files.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you so much..
Will report back what happens if I flash them.
Divyan said:
Thank you so much..
Will report back what happens if I flash them.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The ROM isn't actually odexed in the first place, so I might actually try making a CWM zip out of it, or at least a few bits of it. Cooking up a whole ROM is still a bit beyond me
How did you extract the bb. Using the r&d tool
Sent from my LG-P925g using xda premium
rmein said:
The ROM isn't actually odexed in the first place, so I might actually try making a CWM zip out of it, or at least a few bits of it. Cooking up a whole ROM is still a bit beyond me
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
if you can provide it, i will deodex, root and share
Flashed BB and RIL. BB is as usual 1035.21_20110725 .
It works, able to connect network. Can't say anything about call quality though. I copied the RIL using root explorer and restarted.
Both GETRIL and LG RIL Version identified it as unknown. Sent it to Trym Hansen so that he can include it in the next version.
PS. ROM right now is Flexbomb by Civato. The built in V 20 l/m RIL too works with this BB.
Divyan said:
Flashed BB and RIL.
It works, able to connect network. Can't say anything about call quality though. I copied the RIL using root explorer and restarted.
Both GETRIL and LG RIL Version identified it as unknown.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
please report me after a day is it working good on our vodafone/airtel/uninor w/o signal loss
Sent from my LG-P990 using Tapatalk
spica1234 said:
please report me after a day is it working good on our vodafone/airtel/uninor w/o signal loss
Sent from my LG-P990 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
YES SIR..!!! Ofcourse I will do..
Feeling quite pleased with myself, I just managed to take the KDZ from this and Hell_97's v20o CWM zip, and make a working CWM flashable version of the Russian v20b
There would still be so much work to do on it to make something I could release on here, it does make me appreciate the devs who spend so much time tweaking their ROMS for the community.
1st link from LG seems not working, google found these http://www.mediafire.com/?aa6836nms8c3iee, http://hotfile.com/dl/74810014/000c2ed/V20B_00.kdz.html as an alternative. But maybe It's not the same. We need a hash for the 1st one
[email protected] said:
1st link from LG seems not working, google found these http://www.mediafire.com/?aa6836nms8c3iee, http://hotfile.com/dl/74810014/000c2ed/V20B_00.kdz.html as an alternative. But maybe It's not the same. He need a hash for the 1st one
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Really? Strange.
I have downloaded this kdz file sometime back, not knowing what it is, from LG site. It is 215 MB
Both the links shows different file sizes. ( 134.32 and 125.9 respectively)
Divyan said:
Really? Strange.
I have downloaded this kdz file sometime back, not knowing what it is, from LG site. It is 215 MB
Both the links shows different file sizes. ( 134.32 and 125.9 respectively)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I downloaded it this afternoon, i can mirror
Maybe it's firms from other LG phones and have similar names, because I found also V20C, V20D and V20E_00 files. Let me strike the above post so noone makes a mistake and flash the above.
Seems this page has already the link you refer PAIIITET check if something is newer there.
Divyan said:
Flashed BB and RIL. BB is as usual 1035.21_20110725 .
It works, able to connect network. Can't say anything about call quality though. I copied the RIL using root explorer and restarted.
Both GETRIL and LG RIL Version identified it as unknown. Sent it to Trym Hansen so that he can include it in the next version.
PS. ROM right now is Flexbomb by Civato. The built in V 20 l/m RIL too works with this BB.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Hows the battery life, also tell me if it receives reception on vodafone
Sent from my Optimus 2X
Divyan said:
LG RIL Version identified it as unknown. Sent it to Trym Hansen so that he can include it in the next version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. My ADSL broke two days ago, so that's why there's not been any database updates. Will take at least two more days to get it fixed. (Writing this from a tethered O2x on EDGE :-()
I apologize for my bad English I am Italian and use google translate
I need a guide on how to compile Android from source
(the ParanoidAndroid for accuracy)
which linux distro to use?
which packages to install?
which commands to use?
I have a lot of time free
and a core i5 cpu
I think that to compile Android from source
but I need a guide
then I ask you developers, you can post a guide
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
write from my pc using win8 e programming a websites
bomdia said:
I apologize for my bad English I am Italian and use google translate
I need a guide on how to compile Android from source
(the ParanoidAndroid for accuracy)
which linux distro to use?
which packages to install?
which commands to use?
I have a lot of time free
and a core i5 cpu
I think that to compile Android from source
but I need a guide
then I ask you developers, you can post a guide
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
write from my pc using win8 e programming a websites
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, you need a lot of work to get a working build, as i currently compile CM9 for SXL.
Recommended distros: Ubuntu 12.04 Precise / Linux Mint 13 Maya with Cinnamon interface to have the best linux experience << The best linux distro i ever used
Packages: Well, you need to check the Paranoid site to download the repo for ICS or JB variant of source-code.
Commands: Lots of commands, there are tutorials online. Example >> here
After this, you will need the device tree for SXL, i have one that is deprecated (not updated for some time), it does not work the variant uploaded here, but i will upload it.
You will need the vendor files, i also have the files but as the build of CM9 don't work, i haven't upload them anywhere untill i can get an at least experimental build that boots
Link for android device tree for sxl by me here
There is a lot of work and there aren't any specific guides on how to do this, you need to join communities and be a pain on the ass for them untill you learn how to do this.
I hope this helps anyways
Lexmazter said:
Well, you need a lot of work to get a working build, as i currently compile CM9 for SXL.
Recommended distros: Ubuntu 12.04 Precise / Linux Mint 13 Maya with Cinnamon interface to have the best linux experience << The best linux distro i ever used
Packages: Well, you need to check the Paranoid site to download the repo for ICS or JB variant of source-code.
Commands: Lots of commands, there are tutorials online. Example >> here
After this, you will need the device tree for SXL, i have one that is deprecated (not updated for some time), it does not work the variant uploaded here, but i will upload it.
You will need the vendor files, i also have the files but as the build of CM9 don't work, i haven't upload them anywhere untill i can get an at least experimental build that boots
Link for android device tree for sxl by me here
There is a lot of work and there aren't any specific guides on how to do this, you need to join communities and be a pain on the ass for them untill you learn how to do this.
I hope this helps anyways
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
thanks a lot I think I start tomorrow I'm a little tired
Hi just so you know you won't be able to compile Paranoid Android for ICS from source as it was never released.
If you can get JB to work then you will not only be a hero but also be able to use Paranoid Android source
I have a problem I can not download the sources of the paranoid in any way
help (or build the sources normal Android?)
Did you follow a guide how to set up the environment in linux? Or Mac.. the way you can download sources is git clone and then the git link. There are many guides on doing that part. Also when I download source it times out in a 4 mb/s connection and I need to use a better connecyion
Sent from my HTC Sensation XL with Beats Audio X315e using xda premium
anders3408 said:
Did you follow a guide how to set up the environment in linux? Or Mac.. the way you can download sources is git clone and then the git link. There are many guides on doing that part. Also when I download source it times out in a 4 mb/s connection and I need to use a better connecyion
Sent from my HTC Sensation XL with Beats Audio X315e using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
aa ok but the guide I was reading did not say that it was necessary to clone each of the sources piece by piece, but he said to use a single link.
I have linux mint 14 with cinnamon (from the 13 consigliatami lextmazter I do not work)
both in Italy and in spite of my connection is approximately 16 mb / s (88% above the national average)
Post link to guide.
Sent from my HTC Sensation XL with Beats Audio X315e using xda premium
bomdia said:
aa ok but the guide I was reading did not say that it was necessary to clone each of the sources piece by piece, but he said to use a single link.
I have linux mint 14 with cinnamon (from the 13 consigliatami lextmazter I do not work)
both in Italy and in spite of my connection is approximately 16 mb / s (88% above the national average)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do not recommend Linux Mint 14 as it is new edition, based on new Ubuntu version 12.10 if i remember good, don't know for sure, that's why, on Ubuntu 12.04 building is supported, even though on some guides it is said that on 12.04 it is experimental, well, it was, now it should be stable.
Also, if you want to port things like Paranoid or PAC you should start with AOSP or CM9 or AOKP, to put it short, versions that have guides and source codes on their sites. In my opinion CM is the best thing to start with, that's why i started CM9, after that you can easily port every 4.0.4 AOSP based ROM.
The same thing applies to JB, if you can port or build AOSP or CM10, you can port every JB AOSP based ROM very easily following only a few basic steps, that's how things work in this hood
Off-topic: I was a little distracted from building/testing/devving because of the school affairs, but today i will resume my work on CM9, if things work well, i will have a bootable build this very evening.
same as lexmazter, sound correct. the hard part is build CM9 rom, rest is pretty easy.
Lexmazter, i am about to try take a ramdisk from cm9 primou and make changes in every lines and see if i can get it to work with runnymede. if it does we will have a working aosp bootimg. i have compiled a zimage from source and it works with wifi and bt and so on in sense rom, also zimage works with cm9 with wifi.
lexmazter, can you please take a bencmark test with antutu 3.0.1, the new one, and post screenshot of the score and wich rom you are in ? they have made the test much diffrend so score is diffrend in 3.0.1 than older , so i have nothing to compare it to
anders3408 said:
same as lexmazter, sound correct. the hard part is build CM9 rom, rest is pretty easy.
Lexmazter, i am about to try take a ramdisk from cm9 primou and make changes in every lines and see if i can get it to work with runnymede. if it does we will have a working aosp bootimg. i have compiled a zimage from source and it works with wifi and bt and so on in sense rom, also zimage works with cm9 with wifi.
lexmazter, can you please take a bencmark test with antutu 3.0.1, the new one, and post screenshot of the score and wich rom you are in ? they have made the test much diffrend so score is diffrend in 3.0.1 than older , so i have nothing to compare it to
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
5941 no OC with LTX Kernel v0.7 and Sense 3.0 by fshami, also, i think i found the right ramdisk for now for CM9, it solved the dalvik-permissions, now i still need to boot the build, still trying to figure what is wrong here and why it hangs after Android is upgrading... >> Starting applications.
I can work more on my device now as i have a cheap second phone to use if for calls and sms.
so then I decided, when I start buildare the source of AOSP Android 4.2 jellybean I think it's easier for me to start.
I had to use because the new mint old man crashed always
bomdia said:
so then I decided, when I start buildare the source of AOSP Android 4.2 jellybean I think it's easier for me to start.
I had to use because the new mint old man crashed always
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As a recommandation, i would recommend building AOSP 4.0.4, it is easier to start and has more chances of working, after that, you have the experience and the headstart to work on 4.1 and only after that on 4.2.
Just start with baby-steps, it is easier and increases the chances of success.
Lexmazter said:
As a recommandation, i would recommend building AOSP 4.0.4, it is easier to start and has more chances of working, after that, you have the experience and the headstart to work on 4.1 and only after that on 4.2.
Just start with baby-steps, it is easier and increases the chances of success.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
ahh ok then I try to go with 4.1 if I can not then step 4.0.4
bomdia said:
ahh ok then I try to go with 4.1 if I can not then step 4.0.4
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well, i recommend this because i'm still building 4.0.4 and i haven't successfully booted a build, so that's why i say this, because if you get the 4.0.4, in short terms, all you need to change for 4.1 is the graphics driver, but for 4.2 i don't know for sure, too new for me and i'm still trying to get 4.0.4 to air
then my kernel is not so bad 5838 with sense 4.1 v. 1.5.1 and still missing some improvments
which ramdisk are you using, zimage from stock rom should get it to boot, but the ramdisk as you know need to be changed to cm9. when you compile from source it should also make a ramdisk that will fits the rom, i think it is best to check what the diffrence in the new ramdisk and the old one with VM errors and then fix them, perhaps it will boot then ? one specific compiled by you ? post a logcat in your cm9, had also some bootloop in my cm9 port but got it booting.
anders3408 said:
then my kernel is not so bad 5838 with sense 4.1 v. 1.5.1 and still missing some improvments
which ramdisk are you using, zimage from stock rom should get it to boot, but the ramdisk as you know need to be changed to cm9. when you compile from source it should also make a ramdisk that will fits the rom, i think it is best to check what the diffrence in the new ramdisk and the old one with VM errors and then fix them, perhaps it will boot then ? one specific compiled by you ? post a logcat in your cm9, had also some bootloop in my cm9 port but got it booting.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
just enter the irc channel, will talk more there, no need to spam the forum with this.
The boothanging is because of the audio, the ramdisk is good, i use the LTX v0.7 zImage and ramdisk from stock edited to fit the build.
Also, the ramdisk is not made with the build, maybe if you compile the kernel with the rom, and for this you need to put the kernel online and othe things, and because of proxy, i can't and won't do that. For more details, like i said, find me on the irc.
link here
you say that jelly beans to need a new kernel? because sifting through the Internet I found this: https://developer.qualcomm.com/mobile-development/mobile-technologies/gaming-graphics-optimization-adreno/tools-and-resources there are also drivers for jelly bean of adreno 2xx
bomdia said:
you say that jelly beans to need a new kernel? because sifting through the Internet I found this: https://developer.qualcomm.com/mobile-development/mobile-technologies/gaming-graphics-optimization-adreno/tools-and-resources there are also drivers for jelly bean of adreno 2xx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
yeah, those are the drivers
But they do not require a new kernel
Lexmazter said:
yeah, those are the drivers
But they do not require a new kernel
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
but I need or I do not need?
Featuring a new cpufreq interface, AbyssplugV2, intelliplug and a whole host of new additions that are not available in any other kernel for the x3.
Among them are updates only found in this kernel, saner defaults via config, better optimizations for the actual code and a rewritten version of devfreq.
It also have an updated baseband configuration and built in rather than to keep a module as it makes no sense to have a vital function as a module.
https://bitbucket.org/mourta/liquid_kernel_lge_p880-stable/
Kernel: http://www.mediafire.com/download/viy5a3dtaccd0gm/mourta-stable-08-23.zip
If there is a request for it i also have a ROM available based on grouper blobs, AD optimizations and a build around this kernel with a new dev tree.
For kernel install, it's anykernel, you can install it on any custom ROM, for stock and the lastest updates you will have to head over to Modaco and my original thread.
Note that this is a one time release, if you like it you'll have to head over to modaco to get updates.
it should be noted that the recommended settings is using intelliplug (you may need to use kernel tweaker or trickster mod for that if you're not running my ROM, and abyssplugv2, i also recommend ROW for a sheduler and Westwood for your congestion handling.
Note that you can now overclock to any frequency and it will feed the GPU chip with the needed volatage, this is great for cooking a roast beef but not for any practical use.
Quadrant scores are 8k and the last Antutu was at 16487, no overclocking but you won't reach that without using my ROM.
And with that... i'm done.
Thanks to the IODAK, Fransico, Adam77Root, Faux123 and others that provided code and/or input.
Oh, what I see here? The awesome kernel I'm testing with @ottomanhero and lucaarx and the great dev and friend @IcanhasLG coming back on xda? Let's rock hard&heavy, right now!
peppethustra said:
Oh, what I see here? The awesome kernel I'm testing with @ottomanhero and lucaarx and the great dev and friend @IcanhasLG coming back on xda? Let's rock hard&heavy, right now!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
We'll see how this goes.
Thankfully i am in touch with a mod that will keep this drama free,
And for anyone wondering, peppethustra is head of my testing crew, you get stable releases because of them.
It should be noted that i'm still going to prefer the forum that greeted me over the one that shunned me from the get go, updates here will be sporadic at best but on time on the other forum.
It's great to see your work on XDA.Now everyone can experience your awesome work
P.S. you can find neccessary links in my signature
Great work, running your kernel now.
But Iodak was not updated since long ago and its sources does not contain many great fixes from cm11 kernel.
Thats why Demetris relased Cyodak kernel in Android development section. It's Iodak brought up to date with latest cm 11 kernel .
It would great to see Muorta Kernel based on Cyodak instead of old Iodak. We would have your exclusive features with up to date cm11 kernel upgrades. But maybe you already upgraded iodak's source, let us know
FunkyRasta said:
Great work, running your kernel now.
But Iodak was not updated since long ago and its sources does not contain many great fixes from cm11 kernel.
Thats why Demetris relased Cyodak kernel in Android development section. It's Iodak brought up to date with latest cm 11 kernel .
It would great to see Muorta Kernel based on Cyodak instead of old Iodak. We would have your exclusive features with up to date cm11 kernel upgrades. But maybe you already upgraded iodak's source, let us know
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Obviously, the real necessary updated patches have been implemented yet ("continuation" means this, too), so it's not necessary nor in Mourta's plans to base it on cyodak (which really isn't the only way to find updated code for our device)
peppethustra said:
Obviously, the real necessary updated patches have been implemented yet ("continuation" means this, too), so it's not necessary nor in Mourta's plans to base it on cyodak (which really isn't the only way to find updated code for our device)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's what I wanted to know, as OP didn't explicitly stated it. Thanks
FunkyRasta said:
That's what I wanted to know, as OP didn't explicitly stated it. Thanks
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Outdated sources never are a good base for developing a fresh new kernel or ROM, if there is a new compatible code implementation ready to be merged into the code That's the first thing a good developer checks (and if you can, look at Mourta's bitbucket linked in the OP to view his commits, there will be all the principal news about new code implementations)
Tried this but I loose my modem every now and then and the screen won't wake sometimes.
baxtex said:
Tried this but I loose my modem every now and then and the screen won't wake sometimes.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Go to Modaco and find newer version (26/8/2014) . It will resolve problems like yours
Okay will do.
How's the deep sleep ?
Written from my Optimus 4X powered by Omni 4.4
LGaljo said:
Go to Modaco and find newer version (26/8/2014) . It will resolve problems like yours
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
this version, according to trickster mod, does not use deep sleep state and still screen won't wake up sometimes. so i dropped it for now.
greetings
peter
peter_altherr said:
this version, according to trickster mod, does not use deep sleep state and still screen won't wake up sometimes. so i dropped it for now.
greetings
peter
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you give more info about your ROM, kernel settings, setup etc. and provide a logcat if possible? That's a rare issue you're having there.I've used my phone for 20 hours now, (%3 battery left) and it slept for about 15 hours, same version.
I suggest you to try flashing the kernel twice.I had such problems with iodak kernel back in the time and flashing it twice had fixed the deep sleep issue.
ottomanhero said:
Can you give more info about your ROM, kernel settings, setup etc. and provide a logcat if possible? That's a rare issue you're having there.I've used my phone for 20 hours now, (%3 battery left) and it slept for about 15 hours, same version.
I suggest you to try flashing the kernel twice.I had such problems with iodak kernel back in the time and flashing it twice had fixed the deep sleep issue.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
+1
@peter_altherr And more important thing: have you at least wiped cache and dalvik before flashing the kernel? If yes, try wiping system partition too (no factory reset, you can leave /data partiton intact) then reflash ROM, gapps and kernel, and see how it goes..wait 3 or 4 minutes before trying to wake up device, after the first boot, and deep sleep would start without problems
I have tried the 26/8 version but that still gives me RIL problems, I get no signal whatsoever. I cannot grab a logcat as I need my phone to work right now but I'm Running latest beanstalk version.
baxtex said:
I have tried the 26/8 version but that still gives me RIL problems, I get no signal whatsoever. I cannot grab a logcat as I need my phone to work right now but I'm Running latest beanstalk version.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Wait for next version, great changes will come even about this issue
@peter_altherr you should unplug it from charger and try unplugged.
when charging cpu never reaching deepsleep.
@ whoever had freeze/sod problems with last kernel version: a new fixed release has been uploaded (it's a minor release: reverted GPU OC, which was causing the problem). Check official thread for the download link
my phone does not see SD card with 0902
and yes im 100% sure its kernel problem....recovery sees my sd, and so iodak kernel
Hi, Samsung has released kernel source for this device at opensource.samsung.com . So if someone wants to build TWRP or a custom ROM, go ahead.
Now, before someone says "Why don't you do it?", I'll tell that I don't own this device, I have another phone with same SOC and was looking at development status for other devices with same SOC.
Good luck, peeps.
May devs bless you with some good stuff.
Suraaj Vashisht said:
Hi, Samsung has released kernel source for this device at. So if someone wants to build TWRP or a custom ROM, go ahead.
Now, before someone says "Why don't you do it?", I'll tell that I don't own this device, I have another phone with same SOC and was looking at development status for other devices with same SOC.
Good luck, peeps.
May devs bless you with some good stuff.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
is it easy to bulid twrp now with this open source files?
I tried to build twrp several times, but it didn't work
hi all
for those impatient and dare to try, plus able to handle problems ON YOUR OWN as i cannot offer any help at this point:
anyone interested to test an updated version of BeastMode Kernel R154 by @freeza with the latest samsung firmware N960FXXU8FUD1?
please be noted that:
- this might be EXTREMELY DANGEROUS or could BRICK YOUR PHONE in a few seconds, and I am not responsible for bricked devices or any damages which may arise. so, you have been WARNED
- I have NOT TESTED on my n960f yet (just updated to TH4 from pie but not rooted yet for some reasons). SO THINK TWICE!!
- chances the phone may not boot up properly (boot loop or hang) due to the toolchains used to compile the kernel. I have encoutered this before with only one of the four or five gcc i had which booted up the phone successfully
ideal situation to minimize uncertainties:
- already on ud1
- data/cache partition is ext4 formatted (ideally NOT f2fs as supported by bm kernel)
- capable of diagnostic/identify the problems by examining the logcat/last_kmsg and the like would defintely a plus
to be continued...
Hello, Is this gonna work on newer BL version? FUE5 version, also @CyderXDA would wanna try it, but he's on newer BL. We also have Exynos9810 Telegram Chat, there's N9/S9/S9+ users in there that maybe could test for you and stuff if you're interested
JC1126 said:
Hello, Is this gonna work on newer BL version? FUE5 version, also @CyderXDA would wanna try it, but he's on newer BL. We also have Exynos9810 Telegram Chat, there's N9/S9/S9+ users in there that maybe could test for you and stuff if you're interested
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hi
samsung has just posted a newer firmware N960FXXS8FUE5, probably hours ago, i am going to update it first. will let you guys know
thanks for your interests
ykkfive said:
hi
samsung has just posted a newer firmware N960FXXS8FUE5, probably hours ago, i am going to update it first. will let you guys know
thanks for your interests
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Alright Goodluck!
JC1126 said:
Alright Goodluck!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
update 20160616
updated to samsung ue5 sources
i have built 2 different versions, one with gcc 4.9 and the other with gcc 12. there will be only one version in the future (either gcc4 or 12). the reason i built 2 versions this time is in case one of the gcc used doesnt boot probably there's another one to try
differences between @freeza 's R154:
- kernel sources updated (N960F) without any fix or new feature
- not pre-rooted/pre-patched by magisk since the magisk version may differs from what u r using
- NOTE: other devices preiously supported are not recommeded yet, although you may try, i cant make any promise it will work since i didnt look at other devices sources
thinking if i should release it for testing now or wait until i have time to test it myself coz i don want to brick anyone's phone, including mine of coz
ykkfive said:
update 20160616
updated to samsung ue5 sources
i have built 2 different versions, one with gcc 4.9 and the other with gcc 12. there will be only one version in the future (either gcc4 or 12). the reason i built 2 versions this time is in case one of the gcc used doesnt boot probably there's another one to try
differences between @freeza 's R154:
- kernel sources updated without any fix or new feature
- not pre-rooted/pre-patched by magisk since the magisk version may differs from what u r using
- f2fs supported as R154 (cache/data)
thinking if i should release it for testing now or wait until i have time to test it myself coz i don want to brick anyone's phone, including mine of coz
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Holy that's insane, you added f2fs that's exciting, wonder if it supports AOSP because most of n9 users use aosp, some use noblerom
JC1126 said:
Holy that's insane, you added f2fs that's exciting, wonder if it supports AOSP because most of n9 users use aosp, some use noblerom
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i didnt add anything new, but i found in his fstab, f2fs is ready. i didnt examine the kernel sources yet. this it true for aosp etc also
so in case f2fs/aosp etc was supported in his R154, it should be, i believe...
sorry, but NO f2fs there in his kernel!!
ykkfive said:
i didnt add anything new, but i found in his fstab, f2fs is ready. i didnt examine the kernel sources yet. this it true for aosp etc also
so in case f2fs/aosp etc was supported in his R154, it should be, i believe...
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that's cool, can't wait to try it out in lineage a11 lol
JC1126 said:
that's cool, can't wait to try it out in lineage a11 lol
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i just checked the output, there's no f2fs unfortunately but i can add it later after test
ykkfive said:
i just checked the output, there's no f2fs unfortunately
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
that's still fine tbh, not much difference on ext4, good thing is it works on aosp, idk if it'll boot on oneui3.1 because it needs a permissive kernel to boot so yeah
JC1126 said:
that's still fine tbh, not much difference on ext4, good thing is it works on aosp, idk if it'll boot on oneui3.1 because it needs a permissive kernel to boot so yeah
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
tbf i have not built one with both sammy and aosp supported kernel, and i even don't know his kernel supports aosp
for the one ui 3.1 thing, u mean the ported one? i believe he's made it to run on existing kernel so it should be fine. of coz it needs to be tested first
ykkfive said:
tbf i have not built one with both sammy and aosp supported kernel, and i even don't know his kernel supports aosp
for the one ui 3.1 thing, u mean the ported one? i believe he's made it to run on existing kernel so it should be fine. of coz it needs to be tested first
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ohh alright then
update 20210618
the ue5 kernel works properly so far, tested on stock rom only due to unable to get a ue5 custom rom atm
will be released soon
thanks a lot
released, closed