One simple question: Quad-core 1.2 GHz Cortex-A7 or intel atom Z2520 1,2ghz ??
Hi LenAsh,
one simple answer: YES!
Or in other words...since you posted your question in a device-specific forum (ASUS MeMO Pad 7 ) I /think/ you wants to
ask: "Does the ASUS MeMO Pad 7 have a Intel or Mediathek processor?"...or do you want to know:
"What is better: Mediathek or Intel?"
Or...
What to prefer is mostly based on the answer to the question: What do you want to do with it?
I wanted my ASUS MeMO Pad 7 ME176CX for two reason: Processing power (this is NOT necessarily graphics
or gaming power, it is more the ability for quick number crunching) and the ease of compiling code for
it (C) I choose the device with the Intel Atom Z3745 Quad Core (1.86 GHz peak), whihc runs x64 code natively,
so any PC based Linux distro could be run on it (I even heard of successful boots of Windows ).
Mediathek is relatively unknown.
I am no gamer in the pure sense of this word, so I cannot comment on this aspect of your question.
If you want a more specific answer please ask a more specific question.
Best regards,
tuxic
Related
I just confuse, android only could run in ARM CPU ? do android cun in intel CPU ?
If no, I think that is why Google said android is not suitable for PAD
No, there is code for at least an x86-version of Android too. So yes, it can run on Intel and AMD processors (not some of Intel's server-specific processors though). All current Android phones use ARM CPUs though.
The OMAP4470 has a separate GUI accelerator processor (CGPU) specifically to make compositing the GUI more efficient and faster than what the PowerVR GPU can do. I came across the OMAP4470 whitepaper and this primarily covers the benefits of the CGPU. They write specifically about high resolution (1920x1080) and the benefits of the CGPU in this case (our case!).
I've been trying to figure out if there is special setup necessary to use this CGPU, or if it is part of the PowerVR driver, or whatever the deal is. I really can not find much information about it or the setup of it! Maybe its operation is transparent like the Cortex M3 cores?
http://www.ti.com/pdfs/wtbu/swpy028.pdf
Maybe somebody here has a clue about it?
swaaye said:
The OMAP4470 has a separate GUI accelerator processor (CGPU) specifically to make compositing the GUI more efficient and faster than what the PowerVR GPU can do. I came across the OMAP4470 whitepaper and this primarily covers the benefits of the CGPU. They write specifically about high resolution (1920x1080) and the benefits of the CGPU in this case (our case!).
I've been trying to figure out if there is special setup necessary to use this CGPU, or if it is part of the PowerVR driver, or whatever the deal is. I really can not find much information about it or the setup of it! Maybe its operation is transparent like the Cortex M3 cores?
http://www.ti.com/pdfs/wtbu/swpy028.pdf
Maybe somebody here has a clue about it?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Is this mean nook HD+ can run smoother in launcher / web borwsing ?
Hi! I wonder if there's someone interested into porting Ubuntu Touch on this device
I know that in an apps point of view it's kinda pointless but i just want to see it's performances compared to Android's
I wanted to port it by myself but my PC is a piece of garbage...
The processor it's a Qualcomm Snapdragon 410 MSM8916 Cortex-A53 1.2GHz quad core
It's officially supported by Cyanogenmod
I hope there's someone out there that wants to start this "magical journey"
PS: sorry for my English.
Me to bro . i want also Ubuntu os on my laser
I hope some developer will reply on this thread
Just wondering if there will be support for AMD processors in the near future?
Has anyone had any success with an AMD CPU/APU?
moman2000 said:
Just wondering if there will be support for AMD processors in the near future?
Has anyone had any success with an AMD CPU/APU?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well...short answer....no.
It use Intel dev tools for android.
And amd does not build android devices unlike Intel.
They need to switch to virtualbox like other emulators.
But it will have slower video support.
To add to what @tailslol said, Android Studio (which is what Remix OS Player is based on) requires HAXM to run. AMD doesn't support HAXM. Sorry to be the bearer of bad news...
My question is about android studio's performance under different processors.
I tried to run the same version of the android studio on
1)intel pentium 3 4gb (windows 7 )and
2)intel core i5 7th gen 8gb (windows 10)
And surprisingly I found that the starting time in the pentium pc was faster than the i5 one!!
can anyone please explain the reason or possibly help me out with anything that I have been doing wrong in my i5 laptop?Is there any settings issue that is causing the i5 laptop to give android studio a slower studio?? What should I do to optimize the i5 laptop's android studio??
Check your RAM speed and Hard Drive speeds. They're likely have a large effect on the load time. Also, the processor variants in laptops are often low-power versions with only dual-cores and fairly low lock speed. the i5/i7 labels are just branding and don't actually give a great idea of the performance, especially on laptop processors.