Database Develop

Best kernel for gingerbread MIUI?

I run Miui.us build 2.3.23 and it runs the shade.toxygene CyanogenMod kernel. Is there a better kernel I can get?
Sent from my Nexus One using Tapatalk

*le bump*
10char

i run qnd miui. nw wat benefit will i get by flashing a custom kernel over the stock kernel
Sent from my Nexus One using Tapatalk

Theshawty said:
*le bump*
10char
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Did you just bump a thread that's less then an for hours ago created
Sent from my Nexus One using XDA

good question i will wait with you since i am looking for a good kernel to use with MIUI

race55 said:
Did you just bump a thread that's less then an for hours ago created
Sent from my Nexus One using XDA
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, I did.
Kannibalism said:
good question i will wait with you since i am looking for a good kernel to use with MIUI
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's not that I'm not satisfied with the kernel I run, it's just that I'm certain there's some better one out there.
EDIT: What do you think of the kernel labeled Tiamat_N1-v4.1.0? From here: http://tiamat-dev.com/mahimahi/

the kernel you mentioned is what i am currently using as testing so far its working good with MIUI 2.3.23 and it offers up to 1.2GHZ overclocking which is not stable on my nexus at least

Kannibalism said:
the kernel you mentioned is what i am currently using as testing so far its working good with MIUI 2.3.23 and it offers up to 1.2GHZ overclocking which is not stable on my nexus at least
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Any overclock beyond 1113 Mhz is unstable.

Kannibalism said:
the kernel you mentioned is what i am currently using as testing so far its working good with MIUI 2.3.23 and it offers up to 1.2GHZ overclocking which is not stable on my nexus at least
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
sry for my noob question. but is the kernel jus for oc purpose or for overall performance(battery life,call audio quality,smoothness etc)?
cos i am happy with stock kernel. no issues at all
Sent from my Nexus One using Tapatalk

the stock kernel was good for me to it did not give me any trouble but i like to mess around with my devices the change log for the kernel can be found here
Code:
http://tiamat-dev.com/8x50-changes/
as you can see there are a few improvements to the kernel with each update

I have been having 3G mobile network issue with CM7 base ROM. On certain location, I cannot download and make or receive calls. my 3G icon arrows show upload activities but no download happening. My ISP name (Maxis Malaysia) showing as normal. I upgraded to CM7.2, tried Kang ROM, preshoot kernel and change new SIM card but doesn't help. Anyone has any ideas on this problem? ROM or Kernel issue? Thank you.
Sent from my Nexus One using XDA

Which do you find best out of pershoot's kernel, IntersectRaven's kernel or tiamat's GB kernel?

Theshawty said:
Which do you find best out of pershoot's kernel, IntersectRaven's kernel or tiamat's GB kernel?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
hv never flashed other kernels apart from stock since its good.
isnt wildmonk's kernel the preferred one for miui???
Sent from my Nexus One using Tapatalk

Wildmonks [Kernel] [2.6.38.8 (CM7)] HAVS/SVS + 1152MHz (09/17/11)
is the best I have seen so far, used it for months and often thought I was glad I did because it seemed more stable than stock !
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=693375

futiless said:
Wildmonks [Kernel] [2.6.38.8 (CM7)] HAVS/SVS + 1152MHz (09/17/11)
is the best I have seen so far, used it for months and often thought I was glad I did because it seemed more stable than stock !
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=693375
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
wat are the overall performance improvements wid wildmonk's than the stock? is the battery life good?
Sent from my Nexus One using Tapatalk

Kernel differences

I've looked it up but found nothing relevant. So...
What's the difference between the different kernels available for ace? For example, firekerneloc vs blackhawkoc or cf-root. Where can i find the info on whether they support swap partition an stuff like that?
Thnx

elmusafir said:
I've looked it up but found nothing relevant. So...
What's the difference between the different kernels available for ace? For example, firekerneloc vs blackhawkoc or cf-root. Where can i find the info on whether they support swap partition an stuff like that?
Thnx
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Fire kernel has support and has new sources. About the infos I think you can find it in feature list in the thread or just try it.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium

Latest kernels have support and upgraded sources. Cf-root is for stock roms. Firekernel is latest for cm versions
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app

abhibnl said:
Latest kernels have support and upgraded sources. Cf-root is for stock roms. Firekernel is latest for cm versions
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank for the clarification, I've been looking for a kernel that gives me BLN and works with a stock rom, but I'm a bit confused some roms come with a ton of features and I dont know if they will work for a normal rom (must of th ones I've read say it works for CMX or TWX etc but none mention stock roms)!

I use battery extender as kernel for stock rom and is working great.
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium

So, advantages?
abhibnl said:
Latest kernels have support and upgraded sources. Cf-root is for stock roms. Firekernel is latest for cm versions
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Okay; so I am on Battery Extender (1.4, I believe), using S'perience ROM (based on CM7), what advantages, if any, would FirekernelOC or BlackhawkOC give me in terms of performance or battery life?
Another thing: I've seen both FirekernelOC and BlackhawkOC being used in different versions of the same ROM (take Democracy, for instance), what is the difference between the two?
thnx
elmusafir

elmusafir said:
Okay; so I am on Battery Extender (1.4, I believe), using S'perience ROM (based on CM7), what advantages, if any, would FirekernelOC or BlackhawkOC give me in terms of performance or battery life?
Another thing: I've seen both FirekernelOC and BlackhawkOC being used in different versions of the same ROM (take Democracy, for instance), what is the difference between the two?
thnx
elmusafir
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Why do you use Battery Extender kernel on a CM7 based ROM?
Battery Extender is for Stock ROM

I've 2.3.6 Stock UBKPL ... I want to install the battery extender 1.5 ... also I want to activate the swap, but I don't know if using swap reduces performance of the battery ... ???
Enviado desde mi GT-S5830L usando Tapatalk 2

davidgmateo said:
I've 2.3.6 Stock UBKPL ... I want to install the battery extender 1.5 ... also I want to activate the swap, but I don't know if using swap reduces performance of the battery ... ???
Enviado desde mi GT-S5830L usando Tapatalk 2
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It reduces performance of SD Card.

KcLKcL said:
Why do you use Battery Extender kernel on a CM7 based ROM?
Battery Extender is for Stock ROM
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That's exactly my point. Where can I get all these differences? I just read lots of opinions about these kernels but can find no precise information about them. Where can read about them? Forums are a mess and the search function becomes almost useless when you try to refine search to kernel related posts.

S Perience ROM? Its a stock based ROM!
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium

ROMFlasherAce said:
S Perience ROM? Its a stock based ROM!
Sent from my GT-S5830 using xda premium
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes. It isn't cm based.
Tapatalk 2 @Samsung Galaxy Ace

Which kernel to choose??

Hey XDA.
I'm sitting here with my newly rooted LG phone. And now i want to install a custom kernel. The problem is, i dont know which to choose and what settings after install..
I have looked at iodak kernel because that is whst i found that is compatible with stock rom.
Anybody that can tell pro and cons of different kernels and what settings i should set i to for maximal battery life with 3g always on.
Thank you
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app

Cyanogenmod and werewolf kernel, since the last update of werewolf i think its the best kernel for gaming and has a great performance and battery life, also livecolors are available with ararargis Toolbox
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app

jonteftw1 said:
Cyanogenmod and werewolf kernel, since the last update of werewolf i think its the best kernel for gaming and has a great performance and battery life, also livecolors are available with ararargis Toolbox
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If there is no possibillity for kernel without custom rom, this is definently the way i go
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app

jonteftw1 said:
Cyanogenmod and werewolf kernel, since the last update of werewolf i think its the best kernel for gaming and has a great performance and battery life, also livecolors are available with ararargis Toolbox
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Does werewolf work with mokee rom?
Sent from my 4.2.2 PAC powered Xperia S via Tapatalk

Stock ROM + iodak gives performance similar to initial v10a ICS. Which is blazing fast
Sent from my smart frying pan (Tegra 3)

Ben36 said:
Does werewolf work with mokee rom?
Sent from my 4.2.2 PAC powered Xperia S via Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It should do

Ben36 said:
Does werewolf work with mokee rom?
Sent from my 4.2.2 PAC powered Xperia S via Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
AFAIK, MoKee is based on CM, so yeah, it should

@non4 said:
Stock ROM + iodak gives performance similar to initial v10a ICS. Which is blazing fast
Sent from my smart frying pan (Tegra 3)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
i agree aswell :good:

iodak v6 if you have Stock ROM
Optimus Prime is you have a Cyanogen-mod based rom
Either way always do a full nandroid backup before trying any new kernel or ROM.
Good luck!

Why optimus prime over werewolf?
Sent from my 4.2.2 PAC powered Xperia S via Tapatalk

Ben36 said:
Why optimus prime over werewolf?
Sent from my 4.2.2 PAC powered Xperia S via Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Its all down to preference. Try all if you have too, its very quick to flash a kernel and no factory reset required (usually) I like iodak and werewolf, I would probably like optimus prime too if it supported stock rom
Sent from my smart frying pan (Tegra 3)

Which has best battery life for cm?
Sent from my 4.2.2 PAC powered Xperia S via Tapatalk

@non4 said:
Stock ROM + iodak gives performance similar to initial v10a ICS. Which is blazing fast
Sent from my smart frying pan (Tegra 3)
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm planning to use iodak kernel too,but how is the battery life for that?
LG Optimus 4X HD via XDA-Developers App

AzureV said:
I'm planning to use iodak kernel too,but how is the battery life for that?
LG Optimus 4X HD via XDA-Developers App
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bumppppp!

theofficialpimp said:
Bumppppp!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bumping a thread is not allowed dude
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app

GalaxyVolvoZ said:
Bumping a thread is not allowed dude
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Are you sure about that? Bumping is allowed once per 24 hr.
Phuck outta here.

Well im using optimus prime on stockrom and its great good baterry life and no problems at all for me
Sent from my LG-P880 using xda app-developers app

Both "Werewolf" and "Optimus Prime" are good kernels. But they are a bit different. I'm actually using Optimus Prime v2.7 for 2 reasons: it has WHEATLEY Processor Governor (which is quite fast and it doesn't drain battery really fast) and it uses a sort of Hybernation of the cellphone, when screen is turned off.
Werewolf is good tho, but it drains too much battery.
Anyway, i'm really disappoint about the wifi drivers, which seem to drain a lot of battery, when Wifi is enabled. The wlan_rx_wake wake locks wake up the device too many times, so the battery does not perform really well in any kind of kernel (custom, cm stock and LG stock). I have to disable it and use data traffic only, otherwise smartphone will shut down in few hours.

Speeding up performance?

Are their any mods or anything compatible with this device to help speed up performance?
I have seen some but I'm not sure about compatibility because I'm running Carbon ROM and I'm not sure if that affects compatibility.
Sent from my MB886 using Tapatalk

Create a nandroid backup and try pureperformanceX. I'm using that with Validus 13's KK rom and it is fast with great battery life. I also turn off all animation in Developer Options as well.
I've used PureperformanceX on my LG P930 and it works quite well.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2360985

Like stated I've turned off animation options and I use Lagfix (had to grab the apk from google) and I run that periodically and also DU Battery Saver has an "optimize" shortcut that ends background processes. I also underclocked my cpu to run at 1ghz instead of 1.5ghz seems to have helped me also.

audit13 said:
Create a nandroid backup and try pureperformanceX. I'm using that with Validus 13's KK rom and it is fast with great battery life. I also turn off all animation in Developer Options as well.
I've used PureperformanceX on my LG P930 and it works quite well.
http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?t=2360985
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Would Carbon ROM be CM?
Sent from my MB886 using Tapatalk

chococomaxim said:
Would Carbon ROM be CM?
Sent from my MB886 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes, it is based on CM.

audit13 said:
Yes, it is based on CM.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks man it made a big difference in performance!
Sent from my MB886 using Tapatalk

chococomaxim said:
Thanks man it made a big difference in performance!
Sent from my MB886 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No problem. Which rom are you using? The new 4.4.2-based roms are pretty good too.

audit13 said:
No problem. Which rom are you using? The new 4.4.2-based roms are pretty good too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using the latest Carbon nightly. I'm waiting for the Carbon devs to update the nightlies 4.4.x. I like the stability of Carbon so I hope they can continue it with the kit Kat update
Edit: latest Carbon nightly is 4.3.1 if you're wondering
Sent from my MB886 using Tapatalk

Did you try enabling ART?
Works for me. PA Gapps is fully compatible with ART too.

jaweinre said:
Did you try enabling ART?
Works for me. PA Gapps is fully compatible with ART too.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I have no idea what ART is
Sent from my MB886 using Tapatalk

Has anyone gone from official cm11 to mokee 4.4.2?

If so, what are your opinions on the change/ differences in both?
I'm debating whether to change over or not
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Ben36 said:
If so, what are your opinions on the change/ differences in both?
I'm debating whether to change over or not
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yeah, I did! In comparison to CM11, Mokee 4.4.2 has a much better performance than CM11, which used to be a little laggy...
Mokee 4.4.2 has an RC status and is very stable.
Updates aren't released so often than CM's, but the updates are coming with bigger changes. CM11 updates are coming almost each day, but only with translation updates and some tiny fixes, which are causing no mentionable improvements. Mokee's battery life on screen is almost the same (just a little better), off screen very much better, because of Mokee's battery saving toggle, which is a great feature! Mokee also offers some cool UI features/animations.
In the end I can say that CM has always been a good rom for our 4X HD and I've always been satisfied with CM but version 11 is still in nightly state, very unstable and at the moment I recommend Mokee instead of CM11. Maybe I'm going to have a look at CM11 again when a Snapshot or an RC comes out.
(I don't say CM is bad, it's just full of bugs until now)
Hope I could help ya!
Sent from my Nexus 7 (2013) using xda app-developers app

Thanks! Do you use the stock kernel or iodak?
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

And what bugs we have on CM and don't on mokee since it is based on CM? Also mokee still have double press to wake up bug.Mokee is great rom but CM is too.For mute CM have better on-screen time and that is why I am using it.
Sent from my LG-P880 using Tapatalk

Ben36 said:
Thanks! Do you use the stock kernel or iodak?
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I'm using Iodak v9.5. Stock kernel is also good, but Iodak has a better performance.
Sent from my LG Optimus 4X HD
---------- Post added at 02:08 PM ---------- Previous post was at 02:01 PM ----------
dimi89 said:
And what bugs we have on CM and don't on mokee since it is based on CM? Also mokee still have double press to wake up bug.Mokee is great rom but CM is too.For mute CM have better on-screen time and that is why I am using it.
Sent from my LG-P880 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
E.g. Mokee doesn't have lags or Wifi connection problems. Double press to wake up bug is fixed.
Sent from my LG Optimus 4X HD

Does switching work without wiping data?
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk

Ben36 said:
Does switching work without wiping data?
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Not recommended

Ben36 said:
Does switching work without wiping data?
Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Most likely, CM11 based and Omni based require a wipe because, omni is awkward, check out my post in the beanstalk thread, I explained wiping and flashing etc.
SilentGTX said:
Not recommended
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Dude, was the question "is it recommended to wipe data?" ? No, so why give that answer xD
Of course it is not recommended, it is not recommended to void your warranty and risk bricking your phone by custom romming in the first place but you've come this far now
Take a backup, and if all else fails, just reflash kdz and start over.. Its fine, experiment, that's how to build experience, you learn what ROMs to wipe data, and which you can get away with...
All threads say "full wipe recommended" or similar, but no one ever listens xD
If dirty flash = bootloop, then clean flash, or choose a different rom, or use a backup method..
I encourage failure, then you build the experience of recovering a device, and then you are more confident knowing you have that back fall.
Thanks guys.