At the club, at the bar, or just in your mom's basement, nighttime is when you come out to play. Rate this thread to express how the LG Nexus 5X's camera performs when no or low light is present. A higher rating indicates that the camera sensor "sees" lots of light in dim conditions, and that the resulting photos have minimal noise. A higher rating also indicates that when the flash fires, the resulting photo is evenly-lit without any bright spots.
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Good but not great.
Rate this thread to express how the LG Nexus 5X's camera performs when no or low light is present.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can confirm, the camera performs terrible, when no light is present. The pictures are black with a lot of noise.
I hope they fix this in the next update.
In dim light situations the camera is good...
Few days ago I was at one place and lighting was about 30% out of 100 and 5X performed good, alghough photos had some noise, but they were not dark, which isn't bad.
Excellent for a phone, not much more to say.
How is this getting such bad rep and review compare to 6P when they both have exactly the same camera and take exactly the same quality pictures?
I couldn't disagree more with most of the people here. I have owned a G4, Note 5 MXPE and this camera ranks as follows in low light. 1-G4, 2-3 - Note 5 and 5X (about as even as it gets) MXPE-4
Are you guys kidding? The low light pictures are nothing short of amazing. And I own a 1.8 35mm (which is better, obviously, but comparable).
ppaasseeii said:
Are you guys kidding? The low light pictures are nothing short of amazing. And I own a 1.8 35mm (which is better, obviously, but comparable).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
.agree
ppaasseeii said:
Are you guys kidding? The low light pictures are nothing short of amazing. And I own a 1.8 35mm (which is better, obviously, but comparable).
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This. It's a $400 cell phone camera that compares well with $600+ device's cameras.
The sensor and lens are excellent for a phone. From about ISO 400, it resolves more detail than my Lumia 930, which uses a sensor which is only very slightly smaller but much higher resolution. It also has better dynamic range across the board. HDR+ is particularly impressive compared to the HDR modes on the other devices I've used. However, it really could have done with an image stabilizer to mitigate motion blur on longer exposures. I fairly consistently get less blur in low light with the Lumia and even my old G2, both of which have OIS.
Exceptional
Lowlight pictures are really amazing...
Nexus 5X+ Nova+Root
No issues here.
Low light condition front camera without HDR+ is like taking a picture to nothing but black. With HDR+ activated is really awesome what it can do. Obviously is not like having a flash on front camera but it gets much better.
On rear camera without flash and HDR+ is much the same result as the front camera. With flash photos are really good quality and smooth.
can you guys share photos taken on low light conditions?
cheeze.keyk said:
can you guys share photos taken on low light conditions?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Extreme gorgeous!
Related
I told my girlfriend I'd get her a camera for Christmas. I was planning on getting her a $1000 high end camera but we went to Vegas and she knows not to expect that. I'm down to getting her something in the $300 to $400 area. She currently has this huge 3 year old camera which makes her feel like a photographer. My old sony cybershot was better, it's to bad she lost it in Vegas. I know nothing about cameras and what to look for. Although, I know high zoom and megapixels aren't always the way to go. Can anyone give me good recommendations? It'll mostly be used for still shots. I know she really likes to play with settings on a camera but those tend to only come on the really expensive ones.
If possible can anyone recommend me a good entry level dslrs camera as well. I might be able to get some more money from here until then.
For point and shoots look at the Canon G series. (G11, G12) they have the settings and sensor of a dSLR but in a compact design and no interchangeable lenses. For cheaper dSLRs look at the Canon T2i (not the T3i, same thing, but swivel screen and more expensive).
Fuji S series are very good for the price.
There compacts in the design of SLR with all the A/P S/P M modes including the usual point and shoots & Optical Zoom 10 x can be found very cheap for the amount of options inc.
Panasonic Lumix cameras are always getting excellent reviews. I'm happy with mine.
How abt a coolpix
Sent from my GT-I5801 using XDA App
stylez said:
Fuji S series are very good for the price.
There compacts in the design of SLR with all the A/P S/P M modes including the usual point and shoots & Optical Zoom 10 x can be found very cheap for the amount of options inc.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Ive heard realy good reviews for them... Generally what you want is a bridge camera: someting between a compact and dslr but without interchangeable lens
Sent from my GT-S5570 using XDA App
I took this macro shot of a RC helicopter using a Lumix ZR3.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
get a nikon or cannon, panasonics are ok too
go for the lumix
TravisBean said:
I took this macro shot of a RC helicopter using a Lumix ZR3.
heli.jpg
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
That is not macro, but I like that heli. lol
As I said before, Canon G series are the best for their price vs. Quality vs. manual settings.
jaszek said:
That is not macro, but I like that heli. lol
As I said before, Canon G series are the best for their price vs. Quality vs. manual settings.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually it is. That battery connector is actually quite tiny, but the photo makes it seem much larger.
Macro basically means life size. So in that shot it would be macro if you placed the battery connector on the camera's sensor, that's how much space it would take up on a photo. SO basically if you have something that is half the sensor, it would cover half the sensor. That is of course when you are focused to achieve 1:1 ratio of zoom.
The macro setting on the point and shoot cameras is just a setting that enables you to focus closer, but there is nothing macro about that.
Kind of like this:
Lemon by Jaszek PL, on Flickr
I see many people are complaining about the image quality of the phone. From what I have personally seen I am amazed at the image quality which more than exceeded my expectations.
The following images are taken by myself, with some camera settings changed and manual shooting but no editing aside from cropping.
Most people are quick at talking absolute rubbish or simply have no idea how to use a camera or it's settings.
With some knowledge of photography and using manual settings, the Mi Mix is capable of amazing photos.
Please tell me what is so bad about these:
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
Same image cropped, look at the detail:
Another Angle:
Same image as above cropped:
Image of the metal links:
Sample Image Of Rose:
You are hairy my friend, but nice photo
lesscro said:
You are hairy my friend, but nice photo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
XD
kanej2006 said:
I see many people are complaining about the image quality of the phone. From what I have personally seen I am amazed at the image quality which more than exceeded my expectations.
The following images are taken by myself, with some camera settings changed and manual shooting but no editing aside from cropping.
Most people are quick at talking absolute rubbish or simply have no idea how to use a camera or it's settings.
With some knowledge of photography and using manual settings, the Mi Mix is capable of amazing photos.
Please tell me what is so bad about these:
.
.
.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Picture quality is excellent! Would you please share some of the settings and an idea of lighting. Thanks!
it's really not as bad as other says, but it's not really that good. The bokeh in the last picture for example is pretty poor. There is also a lot of colour noise which you can see.
My biggest problem with it is the colour isn't accurate, sometimes it oversaturates way too much.
Here's my small impression:
http://imgur.com/a/R7cIo
mscion said:
Picture quality is excellent! Would you please share some of the settings and an idea of lighting. Thanks!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks. Settings used:
Mode - Manual
Camera frame - 4:3
Picture Quality - High
Exposure Settings - Spot Metering
Contrast - Normal
Saturation - Normal
Sharpness - Higher
Iso - The lower the better due to noise. I usually use 100 or max 200. Any higher and noise levels will be too high.
Exposure - For beginners this is the tricky part. It all depends on available light. The higher the exposure the better, however, you need very good light for 500 or more. Otherwise in good to decent lighting you can use 60 or 100.
In really poor lighting you may have to go as low as 15 or 30 shutter speed. However, unless you have very calm hands you may get camera shake resulting in a slightly blurry image. It's hard to explain but practice various shutter speeds yourself in different lighting conditions to experience it for yourself.
Kildras said:
it's really not as bad as other says, but it's not really that good. The bokeh in the last picture for example is pretty poor. There is also a lot of colour noise which you can see.
My biggest problem with it is the colour isn't accurate, sometimes it oversaturates way too much.
Here's my small impression:
http://imgur.com/a/R7cIo
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I do agree the bokkeh can be a little fuzzy but then again most camera phones are. You cannot compare the bokkeh from a camera phone to a DSLR.
With regards to noise, I do agree that there is slight noise even at Iso 100 and 200. That said, most other camera phones have some image noise due to the small sensors...
Still, should you have decent lighting, the Mi Mix is capable at taking some good pictures as long as it's set up correctly and the photographer knows what he is doing, not just point and shoot.
With regards to low light, there is no existing phone that can take decent images. Difficult and sensor size is too small. All you can do is either to balance the phone, use self timer and drop the exposure to 1/8 or even 1/4th of a second to get a clean image.
There will be some image noise due to the available light /darkness but these are the limits for any camera phone, not only the Mi Mix.
Say "cheese", then rate this thread to express how photos taken with the Lenovo P2 come out. A higher rating indicates that photos offer rich color (without over-saturating), sharp detail (with all subjects in-focus), and appropriate exposure (with even lighting).
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
I wonder what sensor the phone is using. The EU version P2A42 is using the Sony IMX258. But the P2C72 (Chinese global version seems to be using the Sony Exmor RS)?
NiTrOwow said:
I wonder what sensor the phone is using. The EU version P2A42 is using the Sony IMX258. But the P2C72 (Chinese global version seems to be using the Sony Exmor RS)?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Do you have any reference for that info? I didn't see any hardware specs that confirm it.
https://www3.lenovo.com/in/en/smartphones/p-series/Vibe-Lenovo-P2/p/PPIPPIP2C72
it says only Sony camera, but not which one :-/
here http://www.livemint.com/Leisure/JGS...amera-proves-just-megapixels-dont-matter.html it says that it is Sony IMX258
Photos taken by P2 are awful. They have lots of noises even on the lowest ISO and they lack details. Camera is the biggest disadvantage of this smartfone. But I love it anyway because of battery and performance.
lp2yisdfu said:
Do you have any reference for that info? I didn't see any hardware specs that confirm it.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Strange on kimovil there was other info. The chinese version had a Sony Exmor.
https://www.kimovil.com/en/compare/lenovo-vibe-p2,lenovo-vibe-p2-32gb
Now both are 1:1 the same.. Hmm. But yeah anyways my old phone had a better camera. I was kinda disappointed, and also the software is terrible. It's full of bugs, I will root this sucker soon.
The rear camera is imx258 and the front camera is a ov5695.
Light trail mode...
Stock camera...
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
P2's low light camera performance can be noticeably improved!
If your P2 is rooted and you have enabled Camera2 Api, please try yourself a Snap Camera HDR app ( It's avaiable in a Play Store in both Trial and Pro version, you can also find pro version cracked, erm...let's say, in the Internet. )
I've found this guy's guide in the Redmi Note 4 thread: https://forum.xda-developers.com/redmi-note-4/themes/google-camerawith-hdr-mido-t3656196/post74676264#post74676264. My phone is running the unofficial LOS 14.1 and...it really makes a diffrence.
Photos are being made for over a second and then about 10 seconds takes processing them (you can made another photo in the meantime).
All of these photos were made without any tripod, sometimes I sat down or leaned against the lamppost/wall but nothing really crazy(maybe 30 photos). Some photos are maybe a bit out of focus after close-up (EDIT: After seeing photos in the laptop I think that photos without "tap to focus" tend to be a bit sharper) and some of them are a little overexpossed after touch-to-focus (They don't after pressing the camera button without tapping to focus before), anyway you can play with a metering area setting(I wasn't), but...see it for yourself.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/sets/72157690966808425/
The P2 didn't magically became the S8 or the flagship camera but in my opinion photos are acceptable now.
What do you think?
Chlastek said:
If your P2 is rooted and you have enabled Camera2 Api, please try yourself a Snap Camera HDR app ( It's avaiable in a Play Store in both Trial and Pro version, you can also find pro version cracked, erm...let's say, in the Internet. )
I've found this guy's guide in the Redmi Note 4 thread: https://forum.xda-developers.com/re...-hdr-mido-t3656196/post74676264#post74676264. My phone is running the unofficial LOS 14.1 and...it really makes a diffrence.
Photos are being made for over a second and then about 10 seconds takes processing them (you can made another photo in the meantime).
All of these photos were made without any tripod, sometimes I sat down or leaned against the lamppost/wall but nothing really crazy(maybe 30 photos). Some photos are maybe a bit out of focus after close-up (EDIT: After seeing photos in the laptop I think that photos without "tap to focus" tend to be a bit sharper) and some of them are a little overexpossed after touch-to-focus (They don't after pressing the camera button without tapping to focus before), anyway you can play with a metering area setting(I wasn't), but...see it for yourself.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/sets/72157690966808425/
The P2 didn't magically became the S8 or the flagship camera but in my opinion photos are acceptable now.
What do you think?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Have you tried the Google camera hdr app?
Yes, I have. HDR+ doesn't work.
At the club, at the bar, or just in your mom's basement, nighttime is when you come out to play. Rate this thread to express how the OnePlus 5T's camera performs when no or low light is present. A higher rating indicates that the camera sensor "sees" lots of light in dim conditions, and that the resulting photos have minimal noise. A higher rating also indicates that when the flash fires, the resulting photo is evenly-lit without any bright spots.
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
received yesterday mine...
ok in good light, really good with the portrait mode.
in low light is really poor... i came from a Nexus 6P and is not the best, but the one on the 5T is worst.
better the 16mpx camera, if start to shoot with the 20mpx the quality is dropping a lot.
somethink is not working.
i'm trying the Google camera modded, but no touch to focus. is an improve but OP have to work a lot.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
XDA_RealLifeReview said:
At the club, at the bar, or just in your mom's basement, nighttime is when you come out to play. Rate this thread to express how the OnePlus 5T's camera performs when no or low light is present. A higher rating indicates that the camera sensor "sees" lots of light in dim conditions, and that the resulting photos have minimal noise. A higher rating also indicates that when the flash fires, the resulting photo is evenly-lit without any bright spots.
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I took these photos last night at my friend's bar. It was not very dark actually but the photos were not that good compare to an iPhone or Samsung.
I was expecting a bit more for the so called "low light" sensor. Guess something is not working well here.
ccshou said:
I took these photos last night at my friend's bar. It was not very dark actually but the photos were not that good compare to a iPhone or Samsung camera.
I was expecting a bit more for the so called "low light" sensor. Guess something is not working well here.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
These are not completely awful. Bokeh is effective.
The camera could soak up a bit more light in the shadows.
Were these all taken in auto mode?
Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
johninsf said:
These are not completely awful. Bokeh is effective.
The camera could soak up a bit more light in the shadows.
Were these all taken in auto mode?
Sent from my Pixel XL using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
These photos were taken in auto mode. They weren't that bad but they definitely have room for improvement. A little boost in exposure made those photos look much better without noticeable decrease in quality. Hope the devs will tweak the software in future updates to enhance low light performance
yeah low light is really bad and i doubt that it'll get better with the announced update. I'll return my phone this week
https://photos.app.goo.gl/kBbvjsPNbMGPw0HJ2
https://photos.app.goo.gl/Lp1lQ2vLzX9ToaDq2
https://photos.app.goo.gl/0CvF3wkuA4DAbKM52
The OP devs made a decision to use the low light camera when there really is hardly any light.. I guess they should let the 'low light camera' start to take pictures with a bit more light compared to how it's configured now.. But Im quite confident with all the feedback from the community they will fix these issues. And otherwise there will properly be a smart developer here on xda who manages to do something like that.
Just use Gcam, with google camera it's up there with the best to be honest.
What drink is that, with the Heineken in it??
BoostRoid said:
What drink is that, with the Heineken in it??
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
He called it Heineken Green Tea, but it's got passion fruit flavor. Would you like one?
Just took a picture in Auto mode to show low light perfs
Let me know what you think.
https://ibb.co/h9yNeb
Bart1981 said:
The OP devs made a decision to use the low light camera when there really is hardly any light.. I guess they should let the 'low light camera' start to take pictures with a bit more light compared to how it's configured now.. But Im quite confident with all the feedback from the community they will fix these issues. And otherwise there will properly be a smart developer here on xda who manages to do something like that.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I was thinking the exact same thing.
I'm using google camera with this settings (attached image) Thanks @dabrown101 .
Picture in low light are way better and more detailed. Very pleased with the result. Only problem is that HDR+ takes a while to process the image but that's worth it.
Gcam version post#1536:
https://forum.xda-developers.com/oneplus-5/themes/google-camera-hdr-t3655215/page154
Did you notice improvements with the new update?
Colday96 said:
Did you notice improvements with the new update?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yes it has improved with the update but gcam gives better details in low light .
pixel 2 xl is giving much better quality eventhough it has only one camera lens
delete me
justyourimage said:
That's becore more isn't alway better. Much like the P20 40+20mp sensor - there are limits you cannot easily overcome with "more".
Firstly optics (the camera lens and size unless you want to carry a brick) and secondly the software processing (picture compression, sharpening, white balance and the like).
The Pixel 2 XL has not only native HDR+ support, but also a better camera sensor, lens and more importantly OIS - this will enable it to take better pictures in many conditions - especially low light or with moving targets. The O+5 can come close with the ported GCam App with HDR+ - not sure about the O+5T, tough never going to beat it most likely.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Software processing is the only thing which is making the images look dull. I used Arnova's Google Camera pixel2mod and the difference is outstanding.....
the colours and everything is just super awesome. only the front camera doesn't work when you have enabled the screen flash enabled (didn't try panorama either) but the difference is amazing.
I have been using this phone for months now and im really disappointed with the overall camera performance both in low light n good light..I wish they fix this with update..I'm currently using Google pixel ported camera instead..the only time I use the stock camera is for selfies n videos..the auto mode is crap.. images look so soft compared to the gcam..
At the club, at the bar, or just in your mom's basement, nighttime is when you come out to play. Rate this thread to express how the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's camera performs when no or low light is present. A higher rating indicates that the camera sensor "sees" lots of light in dim conditions, and that the resulting photos have minimal noise. A higher rating also indicates that when the flash fires, the resulting photo is evenly-lit without any bright spots.
Then, drop a comment if you have anything to add!
I have 3 phones atm - Note 20 Ultra, P30 Pro (global), and Xiaomi Mi Note 9S w/GCAM. I never imagined the N20U would be able to match the camera quality of Mi Note 9S w/ GCAM, however after taking some daytime and also low light photography, N20U takes the best pics out of all three of my phones. Even night mode. However, I don't like the all white balance, and even though you can change that in Pro Mode, when you take pictures in Auto Mode, I hate the color that all Samsung phones give out, and prefer iPhones and Huawei phone color temperatures / hues. Also, there were certain scenarios (although not many), where the P30 Pro or the Note 9S w/GCAM took better pics, but that's expected. N20U took better pics than both of the other phones 75-90% of the time, even night time photography
it's all subjective. You like it 75-90% of the time. It doesn't mean 75-90% of everyone else will like it 75-90% of the time. With camera modules basically being made all by Sony or Samsung, they all look the same. besides, I haven't known anyone to print their pics. it's being compressed or filtered onto VSCO or IG anyway does it really matter? Just take your picture and be happy with it. Unless you have a 99 dollar tracphone, it's the same quality...and even if you do have that $99 tracphone, your grandma can't tell what phone it was taken on when you post it on fb.
skoobz said:
... With camera modules basically being made all by Sony or Samsung, they all look the same ... Unless you have a 99 dollar tracphone, it's the same quality.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Software & image processing makes an immense difference - hence the constant desperation for broken GCam ports.
As a S20 Ultra owner - that phone has supposedly great hardware but has demonstrably awful image processing in a myriad of everyday situations (it's still way below par compared to its peers, after all the updates).
-----
On topic, the processing on the Note 20 Ultra is significantly better than my S20U in basically every scenario & camera mode I tried it in, including Low Light (my S20U's photos look like watercolor messes in comparison). The S20U only takes passable images with bright sunlight or sunlight-equivalent indoor lights. It fails miserably at processing images the dimmer the lighting gets, which I didn't find to be a problem on the S20U out-of-the-gate on Auto mode.
Can they bring the software updates to the S20U?
The Note 20 Ultra camera is identical to the S20 Ultra.
Low light on the S20 Ultra is better.
Clearly there needs to be an update for the Note 20 Ultra.
And like the S20 Ultra, it's impossible to take a picture of a document and have clear text across the frame.
Hopefully they go back to the drawing board for the S30 and choose a different sensor/lens combo.
The iPhone 12 camera is going to blow this one away as the 11 Pro is already better.
auto low light example that's lit by LEDs. Not bad.
{
"lightbox_close": "Close",
"lightbox_next": "Next",
"lightbox_previous": "Previous",
"lightbox_error": "The requested content cannot be loaded. Please try again later.",
"lightbox_start_slideshow": "Start slideshow",
"lightbox_stop_slideshow": "Stop slideshow",
"lightbox_full_screen": "Full screen",
"lightbox_thumbnails": "Thumbnails",
"lightbox_download": "Download",
"lightbox_share": "Share",
"lightbox_zoom": "Zoom",
"lightbox_new_window": "New window",
"lightbox_toggle_sidebar": "Toggle sidebar"
}
skoobz said:
it's all subjective. You like it 75-90% of the time. It doesn't mean 75-90% of everyone else will like it 75-90% of the time. With camera modules basically being made all by Sony or Samsung, they all look the same. besides, I haven't known anyone to print their pics. it's being compressed or filtered onto VSCO or IG anyway does it really matter? Just take your picture and be happy with it. Unless you have a 99 dollar tracphone, it's the same quality...and even if you do have that $99 tracphone, your grandma can't tell what phone it was taken on when you post it on fb.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Actually even with same cameras and sensors, you can have Vastly different output. Just look at Pixel phones, alot of other manufacturers use the same exact sensor however its the software engineering that makes pixel phones take great pics. You just sound like an argumentative person, I was just providing my personal experience, and never mentioned that other people's experience would be the same
ca12bon said:
Actually even with same cameras and sensors, you can have Vastly different output. Just look at Pixel phones, alot of other manufacturers use the same exact sensor however its the software engineering that makes pixel phones take great pics. You just sound like an argumentative person, I was just providing my personal experience, and never mentioned that other people's experience would be the same
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
cool story bro. fact remains, still looks the same when filters are applied and compressed when posted on social media.