Related
Hey guys, im stuck on deciding whether i should root my note 4 or not. What's really bugging me is that i will trip knox and will it devalue the phone?
Any benefits of rooting it right now? vs nonroot
i've seen some threads of rooting problems with some apps and such and im not sure if i should wait or not. Im coming from a rooted s4 and i kinda miss being rooted. Come on guys post what you think here!
Belongs in the Q&A section
bipoler said:
Belongs in the Q&A section
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You're right im sorry guys
Any possbility of a mod moving it?
marcustdu said:
Hey guys, im stuck on deciding whether i should root my note 4 or not. What's really bugging me is that i will trip knox and will it devalue the phone?
Any benefits of rooting it right now? vs nonroot
i've seen some threads of rooting problems with some apps and such and im not sure if i should wait or not. Im coming from a rooted s4 and i kinda miss being rooted. Come on guys post what you think here!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Root if something you want needs it, otherwise there's not any need. Do you need tomatoes? I dunno.
marcustdu said:
Hey guys, im stuck on deciding whether i should root my note 4 or not. What's really bugging me is that i will trip knox and will it devalue the phone?
Any benefits of rooting it right now? vs nonroot
i've seen some threads of rooting problems with some apps and such and im not sure if i should wait or not. Im coming from a rooted s4 and i kinda miss being rooted. Come on guys post what you think here!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As stated above, root if you have the NEED to root. For me, I got plenty. Smoothness, debloating, batterylife, awesome rooted apps out there (I know..only three reasons.) For others, they need a specific app they need to run on their phones and it will need root.
If non of these are an issue to you, do not root. If you cannot think of a reason to root without having the benefit of root vs non root listed out to you, I will advice you do not root because that tells me you actually do not have the need to root. Make sense?
As far as knox is concern...I will say only trip if if you have no need to send it straight to Samsung while your phone is still functioning. I say this because they will send it right back to you. Now if your phone is fried, how will they check exactly if knox is tripped? The carriers do not care, tmobile do not care. Most of the workers think nova is a rooted app. Thats how much they know about root.
You go to a carrier, simply do not give them a reason to think you are rooted. People like to take a phone with custom roms and custom kernels on there...thats not smart. They boot your phone, a message at the top most left of the phone will tell them you are rooted. Always go to the store with stock ^.^
Hope that helps!
I have the Note 4. I root it about 2 weeks later after I got it. My reason: get ride of all the bloat junk that I dont need; now I can write to my SD card; unlimited hotspot; lean machine and good battery life. Its good to have su access.
mgbotoe said:
As stated above, root if you have the NEED to root. For me, I got plenty. Smoothness, debloating, batterylife, awesome rooted apps out there (I know..only three reasons.) For others, they need a specific app they need to run on their phones and it will need root.
If non of these are an issue to you, do not root. If you cannot think of a reason to root without having the benefit of root vs non root listed out to you, I will advice you do not root because that tells me you actually do not have the need to root. Make sense?
As far as knox is concern...I will say only trip if if you have no need to send it straight to Samsung while your phone is still functioning. I say this because they will send it right back to you. Now if your phone is fried, how will they check exactly if knox is tripped? The carriers do not care, tmobile do not care. Most of the workers think nova is a rooted app. Thats how much they know about root.
You go to a carrier, simply do not give them a reason to think you are rooted. People like to take a phone with custom roms and custom kernels on there...thats not smart. They boot your phone, a message at the top most left of the phone will tell them you are rooted. Always go to the store with stock ^.^
Hope that helps!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for your input, yes I do have things such as you listed for rooting! Merry Christmas!
chong67 said:
I have the Note 4. I root it about 2 weeks later after I got it. My reason: get ride of all the bloat junk that I dont need; now I can write to my SD card; unlimited hotspot; lean machine and good battery life. Its good to have su access.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the response! I think I know what I'm doing now [emoji14]
Merry Christmas!
Im in the same boat, sorta. Ive always rooted. Everything i had, even the old windows phones. This is the longest ive lasted non rooted. Im getting the itch. My question, if i root, flash twrp, does it erase my data? Not a big deal really, but im on level 110 on ea sports king of the course. Would suck to start over.
Sent from my SM-N910T using XDA Free mobile app
donnyp1 said:
Im in the same boat, sorta. Ive always rooted. Everything i had, even the old windows phones. This is the longest ive lasted non rooted. Im getting the itch. My question, if i root, flash twrp, does it erase my data? Not a big deal really, but im on level 110 on ea sports king of the course. Would suck to start over.
Sent from my SM-N910T using XDA Free mobile app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Neither rooting nor flashing a recovery will wipe your data. Some phones ship with the unlockable bootloaders and the unlocking process wipes the data (for example, on Google Nexus devices). But the bootloaders on T-Mobile Samsung phones are unlocked by default, so flash away
chenxiaolong said:
Neither rooting nor flashing a recovery will wipe your data. Some phones ship with the unlockable bootloaders and the unlocking process wipes the data (for example, on Google Nexus devices). But the bootloaders on T-Mobile Samsung phones are unlocked by default, so flash away
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks dude, im on tmobile. Root then backup!
Sent from my SM-N910T using XDA Free mobile app
Its done. I voided it!
Sent from my SM-N910T using XDA Free mobile app
Rooted is the way to go! Only reason I haven't rooted yet is because I'm waiting for Android 5.0 to drop next month hopefully ! Then I will gladly root. Phone is much better when it is under your control.
ROLL THAT SHT, LIGHT THAT SHT. SMOKKKKE THAT SHT
Those of you who rooted the Note 4, can you confirm if root disables:
Private mode - Possible fix (old fix)
S-Health (maybe only if using Xposed) - Possible fix?
Screen Mirroring (wireless) - Possible fix?
Recording calls (?)
I would want to root mainly to gain access to the external SD card, possibility to enable/disable flight mode using profiles and wouldn't mind about OTA ora Knox 0x01.
But it's annoying to lose those functions for me.
Updated previous post with some links to possible fixes.
virtualdj said:
Those of you who rooted the Note 4, can you confirm if root disables:
Private mode - Possible fix?
S-Health (maybe only if using Xposed) - Possible fix?
Screen Mirroring (wireless) - Possible fix?
Recording calls (?)
I would want to root mainly to gain access to the external SD card, possibility to enable/disable flight mode using profiles and wouldn't mind about OTA ora Knox 0x01.
But it's annoying to lose those functions for me.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I rooted but on a custom ROM and I have zero issues with private mode or S-health. I guess the issue is when you're only rooted on stock ROM. But apparently there's walkarounds for those issues.
shook187 said:
I rooted but on a custom ROM and I have zero issues with private mode or S-health.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks, but actually I was interested on (possible) issues on stock ROM and, most importantly, if the walkarounds really work.
I have unlocked my Note 4 because I run a couple apps that need root access....but I dont change roms because I happen to like touchwiz..but since ive unlocked it I cant get the OTA update for lollipop give me some damn message about unauthorized modification of the system so use Keis..but then Keis doesnt indicate there is an update to be had. Does anyone know how I can go about getting the OTA update for the Note 4 installed? Do I have to do a factory reset and lose all my crap? cant I sideload the update? Anyway have any ideas?
Bastyon said:
I have unlocked my Note 4 because I run a couple apps that need root access....but I dont change roms because I happen to like touchwiz..but since ive unlocked it I cant get the OTA update for lollipop give me some damn message about unauthorized modification of the system so use Keis..but then Keis doesnt indicate there is an update to be had. Does anyone know how I can go about getting the OTA update for the Note 4 installed? Do I have to do a factory reset and lose all my crap? cant I sideload the update? Anyway have any ideas?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I know ur new so I will just start by saying the search feature is your friend. Also Google and you tube. They have a very helpful thread on here for new folk that she took time and a lot of effort to keep up with.
BAD ASS NOTE 4 & GEAR S
Bastyon said:
I have unlocked my Note 4 because I run a couple apps that need root access....but I dont change roms because I happen to like touchwiz..but since ive unlocked it I cant get the OTA update for lollipop give me some damn message about unauthorized modification of the system so use Keis..but then Keis doesnt indicate there is an update to be had. Does anyone know how I can go about getting the OTA update for the Note 4 installed? Do I have to do a factory reset and lose all my crap? cant I sideload the update? Anyway have any ideas?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
The update isn't in t-mobile hands yet it's still in "manufacturer development" we wont get it until t-mobile pimp smacks it with bloat and "tests- makes sure the bloat works"
Dvanzutphenkann said:
The update isn't in t-mobile hands yet it's still in "manufacturer development" we wont get it until t-mobile pimp smacks it with bloat and "tests- makes sure the bloat works"
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thanks for the info. Much appreciated.
BACARDILIMON said:
I know ur new so I will just start by saying the search feature is your friend. Also Google and you tube. They have a very helpful thread on here for new folk that she took time and a lot of effort to keep up with.
BAD ASS NOTE 4 & GEAR S
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Bacardi that was mighty decent of you. To bad you wasted a PERFECTLY GOOD OPPORTUNITY for a famous XDA cyber welcome wedgy... Smh what is this world coming to...
Hi all I'm confused I got a galaxy S5 on Wed with Lollipop already installed. I've read multiple posts and still have one question, "Can this phone be rooted?" I keep finding different answers. If not can I reload an older version of android that can be rooted, I need root for my anti-theft and Titanium Backup. Not to mention root is needed for removing Bloat(crap)ware that Samsung and AT&T install.
Thanks
Zb
ZKornecki said:
Hi all I'm confused I got a galaxy S5 on Wed with Lollipop already installed. I've read multiple posts and still have one question, "Can this phone be rooted?" I keep finding different answers. If not can I reload an older version of android that can be rooted, I need root for my anti-theft and Titanium Backup. Not to mention root is needed for removing Bloat(crap)ware that Samsung and AT&T install.
Thanks
Zb
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As this time, no, the G900A with the completely stock 5.x load can not be rooted.
Since the bootloader is locked, and they bumped one of the counters with the 5.x loader, you can not install a previous version. You're welcome to try but if it fails you will likely have an unrecoverable brick - unless the AT&T Store or Samsung Experience Store has the complete ODIN file to re-flash your device with.
Until someone determines a way of rooting the stock L load, you're stuck without.
Regards.
ZKornecki said:
Hi all I'm confused I got a galaxy S5 on Wed with Lollipop already installed. I've read multiple posts and still have one question, "Can this phone be rooted?" I keep finding different answers. If not can I reload an older version of android that can be rooted, I need root for my anti-theft and Titanium Backup. Not to mention root is needed for removing Bloat(crap)ware that Samsung and AT&T install.
Thanks
Zb
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Im in thesame boat as u. I have been told by a bunch of high ranking devs that it will come its just a matter of time. If u downgrade im almost positive u will end with a very expensive paper weight. Just relax it will come
somebody can check language on 5.0 ? can be enabled multilanguage with language enabler or more locale etc ?
C0derbear said:
As this time, no, the G900A with the completely stock 5.x load can not be rooted
...snip......Until someone determines a way of rooting the stock L load, you're stuck without.
Regards.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Thank you for the quick reply. I'll wait as I'm sure it's just a matter of time before someone cracks this version or a compatible ROM is published
I only root to get rid of bloatware. While lollipop seems to be handling the ram and battery usage better, it still makes me angry when I see one of those crap apps running that I can't uninstall.
One would think the FCC would make AT&T and others allow this stuff to be uninstalled when the consumer owns the phone.
Kingo root method
just watched a video on WWJOSHDU youtube page, about kingo rooting at&t devices any idea whether that includes the S5 with lollipop?
I found on my wife s5 which I had to unroot and return to stock for warranty when I got the replacement & upgraded to lollipop that in app settings you can disable all the bloat
Doubclub said:
just watched a video on WWJOSHDU youtube page, about kingo rooting at&t devices any idea whether that includes the S5 with lollipop?
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
No
Zoey2014 said:
I only root to get rid of bloatware. While lollipop seems to be handling the ram and battery usage better, it still makes me angry when I see one of those crap apps running that I can't uninstall.
One would think the FCC would make AT&T and others allow this stuff to be uninstalled when the consumer owns the phone.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
You can download PackageDisabler.apk and disable all bloatware. It also fixed the "Unauthorized Actions......." recurring prompt after the latest security update by disabling all KNOX related packages.
I have spent 2 days looking for info on this phone and can't find a thing. It is possible I have been looking in the wrong place but here is what I have. I purchased what was supposed to be a brand new g900a. While the phone is in new condition it has no att apps, no att logo on the back and no att boot logo. The phone also has many features missing from the att version like the ability to turn of lte, native call recording and additional controls in the quick access bar.
The bootloader shows official firmware and Knox has not been tripped but the baseband version shows the exact version of the fully bloated att version.
Is it possible I have come up with a g900a that came directly from the factory and never made it to att? If so is it possible the bootloader never got locked?
I have done a factory reset. I haven't dared try updating. I refuse to turn on wifi until I know more to avoid any possible att updates.
Anyone have any ideas on what I have? I have thought about trying to install some of the klte roms but I want a recovery image and more information before I try.
Just to add a bit more information the build number is "dongchao.a725"
I have found other references to dongchao stating they are fakes but I do not think that is the case here but it may not be a us release.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
This is what I did. http://forum.xda-developers.com/showthread.php?p=64251984
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G870A using Tapatalk
Edit: oops wrong thread
jpruett79 said:
I have spent 2 days looking for info on this phone and can't find a thing. It is possible I have been looking in the wrong place but here is what I have. I purchased what was supposed to be a brand new g900a. While the phone is in new condition it has no att apps, no att logo on the back and no att boot logo. The phone also has many features missing from the att version like the ability to turn of lte, native call recording and additional controls in the quick access bar.
The bootloader shows official firmware and Knox has not been tripped but the baseband version shows the exact version of the fully bloated att version.
Is it possible I have come up with a g900a that came directly from the factory and never made it to att? If so is it possible the bootloader never got locked?
I have done a factory reset. I haven't dared try updating. I refuse to turn on wifi until I know more to avoid any possible att updates.
Anyone have any ideas on what I have? I have thought about trying to install some of the klte roms but I want a recovery image and more information before I try.
Just to add a bit more information the build number is "dongchao.a725"
I have found other references to dongchao stating they are fakes but I do not think that is the case here but it may not be a us release.
Any help would be greatly appreciated.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Whatever model it says in Odin mode is the actual model.
Rakuu said:
Whatever model it says in Odin mode is the actual model.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Odin does show this
Product Name: SM-G900A
Current Binary: Samsung Official
System Status: Official
Reactivation lock(kk): Off
Knox Warranty Void: 0X0
Qualcomm SecureBoot: Enable (CSB)
RP SWREV: S1, T2, R1, A4, P1
Secure Download: Enable
Based on my limited knowledge it was what i expected to see.
I have since determined that it must be a refub. I didnt catch this till about an hour ago but the S/N: on the back does not match the S/N: under phone info. I dont know how since the IMEI match in both places.
I did try the phone info app and it said the phone is not a refub?
I do have the opportunity to get my money back but I love not having all the att bloat on my phone. Plus this phone has features enabled that are not normally available.
I guess my big question now is How safe and secure are the DONGCHAO builds from a privacy standpoint? I have been unable to confirm the bootloader status. The phone is not currently rooted.
jpruett79 said:
Odin does show this
Product Name: SM-G900A
Current Binary: Samsung Official
System Status: Official
Reactivation lock(kk): Off
Knox Warranty Void: 0X0
Qualcomm SecureBoot: Enable (CSB)
RP SWREV: S1, T2, R1, A4, P1
Secure Download: Enable
Based on my limited knowledge it was what i expected to see.
I have since determined that it must be a refub. I didnt catch this till about an hour ago but the S/N: on the back does not match the S/N: under phone info. I dont know how since the IMEI match in both places.
I did try the phone info app and it said the phone is not a refub?
I do have the opportunity to get my money back but I love not having all the att bloat on my phone. Plus this phone has features enabled that are not normally available.
I guess my big question now is How safe and secure are the DONGCHAO builds from a privacy standpoint? I have been unable to confirm the bootloader status. The phone is not currently rooted.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Can you post a screenshot of the about phone page from settings.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
Rakuu said:
Can you post a screenshot of the about phone page from settings.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
First of all THANK YOU for your help and input on this.
Is this the info you are after? I can provide more if needed.
jpruett79 said:
First of all THANK YOU for your help and input on this.
Is this the info you are after? I can provide more if needed.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Well you're on lollipop, so I think you're screwed for root or anything, that's the att firmware so I'd assume bootloader is locked also, I don't really know for sure so don't quote me on this , I personally say wait for a second opinion on this.
Rakuu said:
Well you're on lollipop, so I think you're screwed for root or anything, that's the att firmware so I'd assume bootloader is locked also, I don't really know for sure so don't quote me on this , I personally say wait for a second opinion on this.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
I figured root and the bootloader being unlocked are a long shot.
I think I could live without root considering this phone doesn't have much bloatware to remove. And I love the extra features that are not normally enabled.
What I can't figure out is how it has the att rom but no other trace of att. I am hoping to learn the difference in the build numbers as they relate to the baseband version.
The seller has sent me a return label to send it back but they will provide no information regarding the phone or its origins. I have a few more days to decide and ship it back.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SGH-I337 using Tapatalk
Here are some screenshots from phoneinfo. Hopefully they will help clear up this puzzle. I don't know why the build number in phone info would disagree with the number in the about setting but they do.
Phone info also shows I have root but SU and root checker seem to disagree.
I would be happy to share this Rom if we can figure out how to extract it. I really love the having a phone with no AT&T crap on it.
Edit:
Phone does appear to be rooted after all. After a reset SU is not installed. Before installing SU i checked root with two separate apps and both said i had root. Once installing SU i checked again and access was denied but SU was not promoting me for access. I changed the default access to allow and once again root checker showed root access.
There may be hope for this phone yet but i really want to get to the bottom of the DONGCHAO build if anyone can help.
jpruett79 said:
Here are some screenshots from phoneinfo. Hopefully they will help clear up this puzzle. I don't know why the build number in phone info would disagree with the number in the about setting but they do.
Phone info also shows I have root but SU and root checker seem to disagree.
I would be happy to share this Rom if we can figure out how to extract it. I really love the having a phone with no AT&T crap on it.
Edit:
Phone does appear to be rooted after all. After a reset SU is not installed. Before installing SU i checked root with two separate apps and both said i had root. Once installing SU i checked again and access was denied but SU was not promoting me for access. I changed the default access to allow and once again root checker showed root access.
There may be hope for this phone yet but i really want to get to the bottom of the DONGCHAO build if anyone can help.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
As for the dongchao deal I have no clue. You do have root though if its saying you do with no su manager installed or with the default access set to allow which is extremely interesting because you don't have the KK bootloader which is how it's usually done, so either the previous owner rooted it and updated the bootloader or you have a weird version, I do agree you should get a dump of it though. Like I said though, id wait for a second opinion first and in this case so it can be determined if what you have maybe opens an opportunity to get root while on lollipop.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
I'm working on trying to get a rom dump but i'm not sure how to do that without custom recovery. I have not tried to install that yet based on fear of loosing official status and making it harder to return the phone if need be. I have no issue giving up official status if i can figure out what i have because i will keep it.
I have been thru kies and smart switch both show this as a Chinese build. They show OF2 (CHN) Unfortunately this is still vulnerable to stagefright and there are no available updates. I have checked the build for malicious software and all 5 apps i have tried give it a clean bill of health.
jpruett79 said:
I'm working on trying to get a rom dump but i'm not sure how to do that without custom recovery. I have not tried to install that yet based on fear of loosing official status and making it harder to return the phone if need be. I have no issue giving up official status if i can figure out what i have because i will keep it.
I have been thru kies and smart switch both show this as a Chinese build. They show OF2 (CHN) Unfortunately this is still vulnerable to stagefright and there are no available updates. I have checked the build for malicious software and all 5 apps i have tried give it a clean bill of health.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's possible someone modified the build.prop to make it look like the AT&T version through about device. It's really, really easy to do.
Sent from my SM-T520 using XDA Premium HD app
shakatu said:
It's possible someone modified the build.prop to make it look like the AT&T version through about device. It's really, really easy to do.
Sent from my SM-T520 using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If that's the case is it possible the bootloader may be unlocked. If so would it be worth trying to load another rom if I could find one for a g900a.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
shakatu said:
It's possible someone modified the build.prop to make it look like the AT&T version through about device. It's really, really easy to do.
Sent from my SM-T520 using XDA Premium HD app
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Modifying the build.prop doesn't change what it says in download mode, that will always say what the actual model number is.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
I didn't realize how far behind I was until I started looking into this phone. I may be way off base with this but if we assume this is a Chinese refurbished and I'm sure it is at this point. Wouldn't it still show a g900a in download mode but the software could be different. Could they have take their rom and changed the build.prop to look like the art version. That would explain why I have att numbers but no trace of anything AT&T.
If that's all the case should I consider it a blessing to have a debloated/rooted lollipop. Or should I run from it like the plague.
I'm trying to install twrp now and I'm having trouble getting twrp manager to download the image so the bootloader may still be locked. I may still try installing with Odin in the morning.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
the guy who unlocked the bootloader on Verizon's s5 variant has released a document detailing what I believe is the procedure. Could this open the door for ATT's variant to be unlocked?
https://twitter.com/firewaterdevs/status/713906161834192896
http://theroot.ninja/disclosures/SAMDUNK_1.0-03262016.pdf
sensei22 said:
the guy who unlocked the bootloader on Verizon's s5 variant has released a document detailing what I believe is the procedure. Could this open the door for ATT's variant to be unlocked?
https://twitter.com/firewaterdevs/status/713906161834192896
http://theroot.ninja/disclosures/SAMDUNK_1.0-03262016.pdf
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Possibly, based on what I read from it though it needs the string from the dev-edition device, they have that with the Verizon version so it's easy to get, we only have the one, so I think(speculation) it would be trivial at best to repeat this in our model since we don't even know what to set the CID to to make it reflect that of the 'dev edition', I don't think we're getting a towelroot from this at least[emoji14]
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
I'm going to take a guess that the Verizon and AT&T phones are both unlockable via the same method. I don't even know how to run Samdunk.. Phone or PC? (Can't be Phone if we have no root access :/)
this really seems promising, i still love my s5 and would like to have the bootloader unlocked at some point.
I wouldn't get your hopes up. That unlock requires root which means anyone on 5.0 or above already is SOL, even IF that method worked on AT&T.
You cant root 5.1.1 on atnt because root modifys the system partition.You can still gain hardware access if theres an exploit you just cant modify the system partition(or the device wont turn on again after a full power-down) because it is checksumed on every boot. (and you cant remove this because it is in the kernel that is signature checked on every boot(and the user and system partitions aren't mounted yet so you cant run a hack to get around it))
This does not mess with the system partition so you could run a kernel exploit and this right after with out rooting.
For the cid use the tmobile s5 cid it is bootloader unlocked right from the store and has the same hardware(gsm modem).
Although my atnt device has 11 toshiba memory and all atnt devices might.
Guicrith said:
You cant root 5.1.1 on atnt because root modifys the system partition.You can still gain hardware access if theres an exploit you just cant modify the system partition(or the device wont turn on again after a full power-down) because it is checksumed on every boot. (and you cant remove this because it is in the kernel that is signature checked on every boot(and the user and system partitions aren't mounted yet so you cant run a hack to get around it))
This does not mess with the system partition so you could run a kernel exploit and this right after with out rooting.
For the cid use the tmobile s5 cid it is bootloader unlocked right from the store and has the same hardware(gsm modem).
Although my atnt device has 11 toshiba memory and all atnt devices might.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
My att s5 has 15 for the first 2 digits of the Cid.
Guicrith said:
You cant root 5.1.1 on atnt because root modifys the system partition.You can still gain hardware access if theres an exploit you just cant modify the system partition(or the device wont turn on again after a full power-down) because it is checksumed on every boot. (and you cant remove this because it is in the kernel that is signature checked on every boot(and the user and system partitions aren't mounted yet so you cant run a hack to get around it))
This does not mess with the system partition so you could run a kernel exploit and this right after with out rooting.
For the cid use the tmobile s5 cid it is bootloader unlocked right from the store and has the same hardware(gsm modem).
Although my atnt device has 11 toshiba memory and all atnt devices might.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Mine is 15, I may be willing to be the guinea pig for this as long as it's not a 100% brick. I'm not entirely sure about the tmo s5 simply having the same hardware will make it work, if something like that was the case why did Verizon folks have to wait for someone with the dev Verizon s5 to upload their aboot?
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
Anyone here willing to risk bricking their device with a 15 series chip pm me!
I saw on a thread maybe the Verizon s5 bootloader unlocking thread a post about copying your original boot chain to an SD card so incase you brick you can still boot the original boot chain off of your SD. Apparently your SD has to be class 10. Just more food for thought.
How do I check my cid? I'm tempted to test as I have the S7 now. But if this works, I may very well return the S7 due to locked bootloader.
TehPirate_ said:
How do I check my cid? I'm tempted to test as I have the S7 now. But if this works, I may very well return the S7 due to locked bootloader.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Brickbug emmc from play store. Still not clear if we can make it work, it should and can, but I think we're missing the att 'dev edition'(maybe factory has it with this?) aboot as just using the Verizon one doesn't seem to work.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
Rakuu said:
Brickbug emmc from play store. Still not clear if we can make it work, it should and can, but I think we're missing the att 'dev edition'(maybe factory has it with this?) aboot as just using the Verizon one doesn't seem to work.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Shame, mines Toshiba (11)
I just want to let everyone know that I've been involved with the thread over at Verizon and guinea pigged for us. I do have an active, however that shouldn't matter. At the moment, you can run both methods and it will appear to be successful, even changing the Cid, but it doesn't unlock the bootloader.
So for now, we're out of luck.
N4styN1ghtm4r3 said:
I just want to let everyone know that I've been involved with the thread over at Verizon and guinea pigged for us. I do have an active, however that shouldn't matter. At the moment, you can run both methods and it will appear to be successful, even changing the Cid, but it doesn't unlock the bootloader.
So for now, we're out of luck.
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Damn, I was hoping this would pan out as I have a CID that starts with 15. Checked yesterday when advised in the TMS5 3.0 thread. I got this s5 from Samsung insights so I was hoping that'd help but it's At&t branded with locked bootloader. Waiting patiently for an option to unlock bootloader as I don't plan to get a new phone anytime soon.
~TMS5-3.0-TMBUILD on G900A with Blue Ice Theme
joshua14 said:
Damn, I was hoping this would pan out as I have a CID that starts with 15. Checked yesterday when advised in the TMS5 3.0 thread. I got this s5 from Samsung insights so I was hoping that'd help but it's At&t branded with locked bootloader. Waiting patiently for an option to unlock bootloader as I don't plan to get a new phone anytime soon.
~TMS5-3.0-TMBUILD on G900A with Blue Ice Theme
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
If you're comfortable doing this kind of stuff, then you can try without risking anything. Nobody with an original s5 has tried it, only me, but again, mine is an active. That may or may not be the reason it didn't work for me, but if somebody with an original s5 wants to try, that would give us a definitive answer.
I did both methods and everything went fine, with no errors. It simply didn't unlock. So feel free to give it a shot, you'll just have to restore your old Cid if it fails, which is no big deal. The only thing I'd give a heads up on, is both methods erase your SD card, so use a spare SD card or back up your files from it somewhere else.
Good luck if you try!!
N4styN1ghtm4r3 said:
If you're comfortable doing this kind of stuff, then you can try without risking anything. Nobody with an original s5 has tried it, only me, but again, mine is an active. That may or may not be the reason it didn't work for me, but if somebody with an original s5 wants to try, that would give us a definitive answer.
I did both methods and everything went fine, with no errors. It simply didn't unlock. So feel free to give it a shot, you'll just have to restore your old Cid if it fails, which is no big deal. The only thing I'd give a heads up on, is both methods erase your SD card, so use a spare SD card or back up your files from it somewhere else.
Good luck if you try!!
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
This will be something to try for the weekend. I have backups for both SS and FF so as long as I don't risk full bricking then I'm game. I have a few spare sd cards too. I never took any OTA updates, the first one that tried getting pushed on me while still within the 6 month insights program I rooted with TowelRoot and froze with TB. Other than that I didn't do much else until more recently to go to Muniz_ri 5.0 keeproot and then to TMS5-3.0-TMBUILD. I was hoping of convincing At&t to unlock the bootloader along with the sim unlock since they don't have any rights to this phone. I still have my Next plan s5 thru them so I can toy with this one, just don't want to end up completely bricking either. I have 2 S3 that I put full custom CM builds on for the kids to play with, just turned off root. Lol
~TMS5-3.0-TMBUILD on G900A with Blue Ice Theme
joshua14 said:
This will be something to try for the weekend. I have backups for both SS and FF so as long as I don't risk full bricking then I'm game. I have a few spare sd cards too. I never took any OTA updates, the first one that tried getting pushed on me while still within the 6 month insights program I rooted with TowelRoot and froze with TB. Other than that I didn't do much else until more recently to go to Muniz_ri 5.0 keeproot and then to TMS5-3.0-TMBUILD. I was hoping of convincing At&t to unlock the bootloader along with the sim unlock since they don't have any rights to this phone. I still have my Next plan s5 thru them so I can toy with this one, just don't want to end up completely bricking either. I have 2 S3 that I put full custom CM builds on for the kids to play with, just turned off root. Lol
~TMS5-3.0-TMBUILD on G900A with Blue Ice Theme
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
Yea like I said, as long as you follow the steps closely, there isn't a chance of bricking, it just won't unlock. Let us know when you give it a shot!
Still don't work as of yet...maybe never. The main thread on this is here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/ver...locking-galaxys-s5-bootloader-t3337909/page77
samccfl99 said:
Still don't work as of yet...maybe never. The main thread on this is here:
http://forum.xda-developers.com/ver...locking-galaxys-s5-bootloader-t3337909/page77
Click to expand...
Click to collapse
It's likely to be never unless we get the proper CID, which as about a needle in a haystack to guess as the bootloader key.
Sent from my SAMSUNG-SM-G900A using Tapatalk